1
|
Torloni MR, Campos LF, Coullaut A, Hartmann K, Opiyo N, Bohren M, Bonet M, Betrán AP. Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14054. [PMID: 38877659 PMCID: PMC11178515 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance and appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process to ensure that both technical experts and women had a voice in defining the research gaps and needs to increase or reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal birth (AVB) in settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable or underused. METHODS We describe the methods and outcomes of online workshops led by WHO to obtain women representatives' perspectives about AVB research gaps and needs. RESULTS After technical experts created a list of research questions based on various evidence syntheses, WHO organised four online workshops with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. Women rated the importance and priority of the research questions proposed by the technical experts, improving and broadening some of them, added new questions, and voiced their main concerns and views about AVB. Women helped to put the research questions into context in their communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions that influence practices and affect women's experience during labour and childbirth, underscored less salient consequences of AVB, and highlighted the main concerns of women about research on AVB. The consolidated vision of technical experts and women's representatives resulted in a technical brief published by WHO. The technical brief is expected to stimulate global research and action closely aligned with women's priorities. CONCLUSIONS We describe a successful experience of engaging women, mostly from LMICs, in the identification of research gaps and needs to reintroduce AVB use. This process contributed to better aligning research questions with women's views, concerns, and priorities. Given the scarcity of reports about engaging women from LMICs to optimise research, this successful experience can serve as an inspiration for future work. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Women representatives were involved at every stage of the workshops described in full in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Torloni
- Evidence Based Health Care Post-graduate Program, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Newton Opiyo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Meghan Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, School of Population and Global Health, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mercedes Bonet
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana P Betrán
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Althabe F, Altieri E, Arulkumaran S, Ashraf F, Bailey P, Bonet M, Bucagu M, Clark E, Changizi N, Churchill R, Dominico S, Downe S, Draycott T, Faye A, Feeley C, Geelhoed D, Gherissi A, Gholbzouri K, Grupta G, Hailegebriel TD, Hanson C, Hartmann K, Hassan L, Hofmeyr GJ, Jayathilaka AC, Kabore C, Kidula N, Kingdon C, Kuzmenko O, Lumbiganon P, Mola GDL, Moran A, de Muncio B, Nolens B, Opiyo N, Pattinson RC, Romero M, van Roosmalen J, Siaulys MM, Camelo JS, Smith J, Sobel HL, Sobhy S, Sosa C, Souza JP, ten Hoope-Bender P, Thangaratinam S, Varallo J, Wright A, Yates A, Oladapo OO. A research agenda to improve incidence and outcomes of assisted vaginal birth. Bull World Health Organ 2023; 101:723-729. [PMID: 37961052 PMCID: PMC10630731 DOI: 10.2471/blt.23.290140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Access to emergency obstetric care, including assisted vaginal birth and caesarean birth, is crucial for improving maternal and childbirth outcomes. However, although the proportion of births by caesarean section has increased during the last few decades, the use of assisted vaginal birth has declined. This is particularly the case in low- and middle-income countries, despite an assisted vaginal birth often being less risky than caesarean birth. We therefore conducted a three-step process to identify a research agenda necessary to increase the use of, or reintroduce, assisted vaginal birth: after conducting an evidence synthesis, which informed a consultation with technical experts who proposed an initial research agenda, we sought and incorporated the views of women's representatives of this agenda. This process has allowed us to identify a comprehensive research agenda, with topics categorized as: (i) the need to understand women's perceptions of assisted vaginal birth, and provide appropriate and reliable information; (ii) the importance of training health-care providers in clinical skills but also in respectful care, effective communication, shared decision-making and informed consent; and (iii) the barriers to and facilitators of implementation and sustainability. From women's feedback, we learned of the urgent need to recognize labour, childbirth and postpartum experiences as inherently physiological and dignified human processes, in which interventions should only be implemented if necessary. The promotion and/or reintroduction of assisted vaginal birth in low-resource settings requires governments, policy-makers and hospital administrators to support skilled health-care providers who can, in turn, respectfully support women in labour and childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Pilar Betrán
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Regina Torloni
- EBH Postgraduate Programme, Department of Medicine, Sao Paulo Federal University-UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Elena Altieri
- Behavioural Insights Unit, Department of Communications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
- St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Fatema Ashraf
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Patricia Bailey
- Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, FHI360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Mercedes Bonet
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maurice Bucagu
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emma Clark
- Maternal Child Health and Nutrition, USAID Bureau for Global Health, Arlington, United States
| | - Nasrin Changizi
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Robyn Churchill
- Maternal Child Health and Nutrition, USAID Bureau for Global Health, Arlington, United States
| | | | - Soo Downe
- Department of Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Draycott
- The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Arfang Faye
- Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Unit, Ministry of Health, Gambia
| | - Claire Feeley
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | - Atf Gherissi
- High School for Health Science and Techniques, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | - Gagan Grupta
- United Nations Children's Fund, New York, United States
| | | | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katharina Hartmann
- Mother Hood e.V. - Federal Parents' Initiative for the Protection of Mother and Child during Pregnancy, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lubna Hassan
- Women's Health Intervention and Development Initiative, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - George Justus Hofmeyr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | | | - Charles Kabore
- Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Nancy Kidula
- WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Carol Kingdon
- Research in Childbirth and Health Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Oleg Kuzmenko
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- EBH Postgraduate Programme, Department of Medicine, Sao Paulo Federal University-UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pisake Lumbiganon
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Glen DL Mola
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Behavioural Insights Unit, Department of Communications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Allisyn Moran
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bremen de Muncio
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Barbara Nolens
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Newton Opiyo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Robert C Pattinson
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, FHI360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Mariana Romero
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jos van Roosmalen
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Maternal Child Health and Nutrition, USAID Bureau for Global Health, Arlington, United States
| | - Monica M Siaulys
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jose Simon Camelo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Thamini Uhai (Value Life), United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Jeffrey Smith
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Howard L Sobel
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- The Chilterns, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Soha Sobhy
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Unit, Ministry of Health, Gambia
| | - Claudio Sosa
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Joao Paulo Souza
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Tete, Mozambique
| | - Petra ten Hoope-Bender
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- High School for Health Science and Techniques, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - John Varallo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- United Nations Children's Fund, New York, United States
| | - Alison Wright
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Yates
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
- Mother Hood e.V. - Federal Parents' Initiative for the Protection of Mother and Child during Pregnancy, Bonn, Germany
| | - Olufemi O Oladapo
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderson R, Zaman SB, Jimmy AN, Read JM, Limmer M. Strengthening quality in sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health systems in low- and middle-income countries through midwives and facility mentoring: an integrative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:712. [PMID: 37798690 PMCID: PMC10552246 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06027-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an urgent global call for health systems to strengthen access to quality sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health, particularly for the most vulnerable. Professional midwives with enabling environments are identified as an important solution. However, a multitude of barriers prevent midwives from fully realizing their potential. Effective interventions to address known barriers and enable midwives and quality sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health are less well known. This review intends to evaluate the literature on (1) introducing midwives in low- and middle-income countries, and (2) on mentoring as a facilitator to enable midwives and those in midwifery roles to improve sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health service quality within health systems. METHODS An integrative systematic literature review was conducted, guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome framework. Articles were reviewed for quality and relevance using the Gough weight-of-evidence framework and themes were identified. A master table categorized articles by Gough score, methodology, country of focus, topic areas, themes, classification of midwives, and mentorship model. The World Health Organization health systems building block framework was applied for data extraction and analysis. RESULTS Fifty-three articles were included: 13 were rated as high, 36 as medium, and four as low according to the Gough criteria. Studies that focused on midwives primarily highlighted human resources, governance, and service delivery while those focused on mentoring were more likely to highlight quality services, lifesaving commodities, and health information systems. Midwives whose pre-service education met global standards were found to have more efficacy. The most effective mentoring packages were comprehensive, integrated into existing systems, and involved managers. CONCLUSIONS Effectively changing sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health systems is complex. Globally standard midwives and a comprehensive mentoring package show effectiveness in improving service quality and utilization. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022367657).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rondi Anderson
- The Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
| | - Sojib Bin Zaman
- Department of Health Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Abdun Naqib Jimmy
- Environmental Science Department, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jonathan M Read
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Mark Limmer
- The Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nuampa S, Ratinthorn A, Lumbiganon P, Rungreangkulkij S, Rujiraprasert N, Buaboon N, Jampathong N, Dumont A, Hanson C, de Loenzien M, Bohren MA, Betrán AP. "Because it eases my Childbirth Plan": a qualitative study on factors contributing to preferences for caesarean section in Thailand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:280. [PMID: 37095449 PMCID: PMC10124050 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05576-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although caesarean section (CS) rates have increased rapidly in Thailand, the upward trend is not supported by significant maternal or perinatal health benefits. The appropriate use of CS through QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers (QUALI-DEC project) aims to design and implement a strategy to optimize the use of CS through non-clinical interventions. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing women's and health professionals' preferences for CS delivery in Thailand. METHODS We conducted a formative qualitative study by using semi-structured in-depth interviews with pregnant and postpartum women, and healthcare staff. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from eight hospitals across four regions of Thailand. Content analysis was used to develop the main themes. RESULTS There were 78 participants, including 27 pregnant and 25 postpartum women, 8 administrators, 13 obstetricians, and 5 interns. We identified three main themes and seven sub-themes of women and healthcare providers' perceptions on CS: (1) avoiding the negative experiences from vaginal birth (the pain of labor and childbirth, uncertainty during the labor period); (2) CS is a safer mode of birth (guarantees the baby's safety, a protective shield for doctors); and (3) CS facilitates time management (baby's destiny at an auspicious time, family's management, manage my work/time). CONCLUSIONS Women mentioned negative experiences and beliefs about vaginal delivery, labor pain, and uncertain delivery outcomes as important factors influencing CS preferences. On the other hand, CS is safer for babies and facilitates multiple tasks in women's lives. From health professionals' perspectives, CS is the easier and safer method for patients and them. Interventions to reduce unnecessary CS, including QUALI-DEC, should be designed and implemented, taking into consideration the perceptions of both women and healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasitara Nuampa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ameporn Ratinthorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Pisake Lumbiganon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Somporn Rungreangkulkij
- Centre for Research and Training on Gender and Women's Health, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Nilubon Rujiraprasert
- Centre for Research and Training on Gender and Women's Health, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Natthapat Buaboon
- Department of Family of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, Thammasat University, Prathumthani, Thailand
| | | | - Alexandre Dumont
- Université Paris Cité, IRD, Inserm, F-75006, Paris, Ceped, France
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Ana Pilar Betrán
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torloni MR, Opiyo N, Altieri E, Sobhy S, Thangaratinam S, Nolens B, Geelhoed D, Betran AP. Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070640. [PMID: 36787978 PMCID: PMC9930566 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise the evidence from studies that implemented interventions to increase/reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal births (AVB). DESIGN Systematic review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included experimental, semi-experimental and observational studies that reported any intervention to reintroduce/increase AVB use. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane, WHO Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO.int/ictrp through September 2021. RISK OF BIAS For trials, we used the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care tool; for other designs we used Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Due to heterogeneity in interventions, we did not conduct meta-analyses. We present data descriptively, grouping studies according to settings: high-income countries (HICs) or low/middle-income countries (LMICs). We classified direction of intervention effects as (a) statistically significant increase or decrease, (b) no statistically significant change or (c) statistical significance not reported in primary study. We provide qualitative syntheses of the main barriers and enablers for success of the intervention. RESULTS We included 16 studies (10 from LMICs), mostly of low or moderate methodological quality, which described interventions with various components (eg, didactic sessions, simulation, hands-on training, guidelines, audit/feedback). All HICs studies described isolated initiatives to increase AVB use; 9/10 LMIC studies tested initiatives to increase AVB use as part of larger multicomponent interventions to improve maternal/perinatal healthcare. No study assessed women's views or designed interventions using behavioural theories. Overall, interventions were less successful in LMICs than in HICs. Increase in AVB use was not associated with significant increase in adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes. The main barriers to the successful implementation of the initiatives were related to staff and hospital environment. CONCLUSIONS There is insufficient evidence to indicate which intervention, or combination of interventions, is more effective to safely increase AVB use. More research is needed, especially in LMICs, including studies that design interventions taking into account theories of behaviour change. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020215224.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Regina Torloni
- Department of Medicine, Evidence Based Healthcare Post-Graduate Program, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Newton Opiyo
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elena Altieri
- Behavioral Insights Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Soha Sobhy
- Women's Health Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barbara Nolens
- Department of Obstetrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederike Geelhoed
- Provincial Directorate of Health, Tete Provincial Hospital, Cidade de Tete, Mozambique
| | - Ana Pilar Betran
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|