CK20 versus AMACR and p53 immunostains in evaluation of Urothelial Carcinoma in Situ and Reactive Atypia

Loss of MTAP Expression by Immunohistochemistry Is a Surrogate Marker for Homozygous 9p21.3 Deletion in Urothelial Carcinoma

Homozygous deletion of the chromosomal region 9p21.3 is common in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and leads to loss of several genes, including CDKN2A and MTAP, resulting in loss of MTAP protein expression. Here, we aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of MTAP immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate marker for homozygous 9p21.3 deletion (9p21 homozygous deletion [HD]) in UC. MTAP status was determined by IHC on 27 UC tissue specimens with known 9p21.3 status as defined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in matched cytological specimens, by IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization on a tissue microarray (TMA) containing 359 UC at different stages, and by IHC on 729 consecutive UC from routine practice. Moreover, we analyzed a longitudinal series of matched specimens from 38 patients with MTAP-negative recurrent UC. MTAP loss by IHC was found in all 17 patients with 9p21 HD and in 2/8 cases without 9p21 HD. In the TMA, MTAP loss was more common in metastases (53%) than in muscle-invasive (33%) and non-muscle-invasive UC (29%) (P = .03). In the consecutive series, 164/729 (22%) cases showed loss of MTAP expression. In 41 of these 164 cases (25%), loss of MTAP expression was heterogenous. We also discovered loss of MTAP expression in flat urothelium adjacent to MTAP-negative low-grade UC, suggesting true flat low-grade neoplasia that could not be diagnosed by morphology alone. Longitudinal analysis of recurrences showed persistent negative MTAP status over time in 37/38 (97%) patients. MTAP IHC can serve as a surrogate marker for 9p21 HD in UC and as a diagnostic tool to differentiate reactive urothelium from urothelial neoplasia. It also provides a unique opportunity to study clinicopathological associations and the heterogeneity of 9p21 HD across the whole spectrum of UC manifestations.

Diagnostic Challenges during Inflammation and Cancer: Current Biomarkers and Future Perspectives in Navigating through the Minefield of Reactive versus Dysplastic and Cancerous Lesions in the Digestive System

In the setting of pronounced inflammation, changes in the epithelium may overlap with neoplasia, often rendering it impossible to establish a diagnosis with certainty in daily clinical practice. Here, we discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms driving tissue response during persistent inflammatory signaling along with the potential association with cancer in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, extrahepatic bile ducts, and liver. We highlight the histopathological challenges encountered in the diagnosis of chronic inflammation in routine practice and pinpoint tissue-based biomarkers that could complement morphology to differentiate reactive from dysplastic or cancerous lesions. We refer to the advantages and limitations of existing biomarkers employing immunohistochemistry and point to promising new markers, including the generation of novel antibodies targeting mutant proteins, miRNAs, and array assays. Advancements in experimental models, including mouse and 3D models, have improved our understanding of tissue response. The integration of digital pathology along with artificial intelligence may also complement routine visual inspections. Navigating through tissue responses in various chronic inflammatory contexts will help us develop novel and reliable biomarkers that will improve diagnostic decisions and ultimately patient treatment.

The Application and Pitfalls of Immunohistochemical Markers in Challenging Diagnosis of Genitourinary Pathology

CONTEXT.—

The morphologic features of different entities in genitourinary pathology overlap, presenting a diagnostic challenge, especially when diagnostic materials are limited. Immunohistochemical markers are valuable when morphologic features alone are insufficient for definitive diagnosis. The World Health Organization classification of urinary and male genital tumors has been updated for 2022. An updated review of immunohistochemical markers for newly classified genitourinary neoplasms and their differential diagnosis is needed.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of genitourinary lesions in the kidney, bladder, prostate, and testis. We particularly emphasized difficult differential diagnosis and pitfalls in immunohistochemistry application and interpretation. New markers and new entities in the 2022 World Health Organization classifications of genitourinary tumors are reviewed. Recommended staining panels for commonly encountered difficult differential diagnoses and potential pitfalls are discussed.

DATA SOURCES.—

Review of current literature and our own experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of problematic lesions of the genitourinary tract. However, the immunostains must be carefully interpreted in the context of morphologic findings with a thorough knowledge of pitfalls and limitations.

Expression of Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, a Cancer/Testis Antigen, in Carcinoma In Situ of the Urinary Tract

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary tract comprises 1-3% of all urothelial malignancies and is often a precursor to muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to examine the expression profiles of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), a cancer/testis antigen, and assess its diagnostic and therapeutic applications in CIS, given that its expression in UC has been minimally studied and has not yet been analyzed in CIS. We selected consecutive patients with CIS who underwent biopsy and/or transurethral tumor resection at the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital. Immunohistochemical staining for PRAME and p53 was performed. Overall, 53 patients with CIS (6 females and 47 males) were included. Notably, PRAME expression was observed in 23 of the 53 patients (43.4%), whereas it was absent in the non-neoplastic urothelial epithelium. Furthermore, no correlation was found between PRAME expression and aberrant p53 expression. Therefore, PRAME expression may serve as a useful marker for CIS of the urinary tract. Furthermore, PRAME may be a candidate for the novel therapeutic target for standard treatment-refractory CIS patients.

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of mixed (Low and high-grade) papillary urothelial carcinoma comparison with low and high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma

The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (2022 WHO/ISUP) classification categorizes noninvasive carcinomas based on the highest grade observed in a pathology sample. According to this classification, a lesion is classified as mixed-grade (MG) if the highest-grade component comprises less than 5% high-grade (HG) carcinoma [14]. This study included 160 cases of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (LGUC) and 160 cases of HG papillary urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), selected randomly. In addition, 160 consecutive and unselected cases of MG papillary urothelial carcinoma (MGUC) were obtained from all bladder transurethral resection specimens diagnosed with papillary urothelial carcinoma between January 2007 and January 2021. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that histologic grade, invasion of the lamina propria, and the presence of carcinoma in situ at presentation were independent prognostic parameters regarding recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.059-1.956, p = 0.02; and HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.159-2.684, p = 0.008, respectively). Histologic grade was the only independent prognostic parameter of disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < 0.001). Comparisons between non-muscle invasive (NMI) MGUC and NMI LGUC, as well as between NMI MGUC and NMI HGUC, revealed statistically significant differences in terms of DSS (HR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.024-0.252, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.023-2.460, p = 0.039, respectively). Our study findings demonstrate statistically significant differences regarding DSS between NMI MGUC and NMI HGUC, as well as between NMI MGUC and NMI LGUC. Therefore, we suggested that considering the presence of less than 5% MGUC as a separate category may be appropriate. However, it is important to validate our results in larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods to establish the clinical significance of MGUC and provide guidance for patient management.

Diagnostic Roles of Immunohistochemical Markers CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53 in Urothelial Carcinoma In Situ

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic roles of various immunohistochemical (IHC) markers in urothelial carcinoma in situ (uCIS) through a meta-analysis and review of diagnostic test accuracy. Materials and Methods: The IHC markers CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53 were evaluated in the present study. We analyzed the expression rates of the IHC markers and compared their diagnostic accuracies. Results: The estimated expression rates were 0.803 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.726-0.862), 0.142 (95% CI: 0.033-0.449), 0.824 (95% CI: 0.720-0.895), and 0.600 (95% CI: 0.510-0.683) for CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53, respectively. In the comparison between uCIS and reactive/normal urothelium, the expression of CK20, AMACR, and p53 in uCIS was significantly higher than in reactive/normal urothelium. CD44 showed significantly lower expression in uCIS than in the reactive/normal urothelium. Among the markers, AMACR had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio. The AUC on SROC was the highest for CK20. Conclusions: In conclusion, IHC markers, such as CK20, CD44, AMACR, and p53, can be useful in differentiating uCIS from reactive/normal urothelium.

Update on Flat and Papillary Urothelial Lesions: Genitourinary Pathology Society Consensus Recommendations

The reporting recommendations on "flat and papillary urothelial neoplasia," published in 2 position articles by the Genitourinary Pathology Society in July 2021, was a collective contribution of 38 multidisciplinary experts aiming to clarify nomenclature, classification of flat and papillary urothelial neoplasia and controversial issues. In this review, we discuss some of these recommendations including nomenclature, practical approaches, and their importance for clinical practice.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of CK20, CD44, Ki67 and p53 as immunohistochemical markers in bladder carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Urothelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ (CIS) are related to recurrence and progression of urothelial carcinoma. Differentiating CIS and dysplasia from reactive atypia is often difficult based only on histological features. The integration of histological findings with immunohistochemistry is used in routine practice to make a diagnosis of CIS and, for this purpose, the immunohistochemical markers CK20, CD44, Ki67 and p53 are used to supplement histology. In this work, we aimed to assess CK20, CD44, Ki67 and p53 as immunohistochemical markers in patients with CIS through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching electronic databases for English-language studies published from January 2010 to April 2021. Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated the CK20, CD44, Ki67 and p53 expression in CIS.

RESULTS

In total, 15 references were suitable for quantitative review. The overall rate of CK20, CD44, Ki67 and p53 expression in CIS was 43%, 31%, 44%, 38%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the 2014 International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus that histological assessment remains the gold standard to diagnose urothelial CIS and suggests that a very close correlation between morphological, immunohistochemical and clinical data is essential to provide the best management for patients with bladder carcinoma.

p53 null phenotype is a "positive result" in urothelial carcinoma in situ

The concept of a "p53 null phenotype" (complete loss of staining) is well-recognized in the gynecologic pathology literature, implicitly reflecting that this staining pattern represents a TP53 mutation. However, in the genitourinary pathology literature, a p53 null phenotype has only been addressed regarding the prognosis of invasive urothelial carcinoma, and not as a diagnostic biomarker for urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS). Herein, 25 cases of urothelial carcinoma in situ [diagnoses made on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections] showing null pattern p53 staining were retrieved from 22 different patients (16 males and 6 females, age range 52-85 years; average 69.6 years), most commonly showing large cell pleomorphic pattern morphology. One representative tissue block per case was selected for next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). All 21 cases (100%) passing quality control for NGS showed at least 1 TP53 mutation (majority nonsense or frameshift mutations), including 3 cases with 2 mutations and 3 cases with 3 mutations. Three patients with multiple available samples harbored 1 or more shared TP53 mutations at 2 different time points, indicating clonality of the temporally distinct lesions. Additionally, 2 patients had an additional unique TP53 mutation at a later time point, suggesting intratumoral heterogeneity and/or temporal clonal evolution. While urothelial CIS remains an H&E diagnosis in most cases, a p53 immunostain may be useful in a subset of challenging cases. This study demonstrates that a p53 null phenotype represents an aberrant result in urothelial CIS with supportive molecular analysis showing a previously unknown level of complexity for TP53 mutations among these noninvasive lesions. Adequate recognition of the p53 null phenotype as a "biologically supportive result", similar to strong and diffuse staining with p53, is important and may warrant a formal consensus statement for recommended p53 reporting (i.e., "wild type" versus "aberrant or mutant").

The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

The aim of this review is to analyze and describe the current landscape of bladder cancer diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers. We researched the literature from 2016 to November 2021 to find the most promising new molecules and divided them into seven different subgroups based on their function and location in the cell. Although cystoscopy and cytology are still the gold standard for diagnosis and surveillance when it comes to bladder cancer (BCa), their cost is quite a burden for national health systems worldwide. Currently, the research is focused on finding a biomarker that has high negative predictive value (NPV) and can exclude with a certainty the presence of the tumor, considering missing it could be disastrous for the patient. Every subgroup has its own advantages and disadvantages; for example, protein biomarkers cost less than genomic ones, but on the other hand, they seem to be less precise. We tried to simplify this complicated topic as much as possible in order to make it comprehensible to doctors and urologists that are not as familiar with it, as well as encourage them to actively participate in ongoing research.

The Genitourinary Pathology Society Update on Classification and Grading of Flat and Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia With New Reporting Recommendations and Approach to Lesions With Mixed and Early Patterns of Neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in bladder neoplasia with a focus on issues relevant to the practicing surgical pathologist for the understanding and effective reporting of bladder cancer, emphasizing particularly on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The work is presented in 2 manuscripts. Here, in the first, we revisit the nomenclature and classification system used for grading flat and papillary urothelial lesions centering on clinical relevance, and on dilemmas related to application in routine reporting. As patients of noninvasive bladder cancer frequently undergo cystoscopy and biopsy in their typically prolonged clinical course and for surveillance of disease, we discuss morphologies presented in these scenarios which may not have readily applicable diagnostic terms in the WHO classification. The topic of inverted patterns in urothelial neoplasia, particularly when prominent or exclusive, and beyond inverted papilloma has not been addressed formally in the WHO classification. Herein we provide a through review and suggest guidelines for when and how to report such lesions. In promulgating these GUPS recommendations, we aim to provide clarity on the clinical application of these not so uncommon diagnostically challenging situations encountered in routine practice, while also importantly advocating consistent terminology which would inform future work.

Urothelial carcinoma in situ: diagnostic update

Based on the current WHO 2016 classification, the spectrum of flat urothelial lesions with atypia includes reactive urothelial atypia, urothelial atypia of unknown significance, urothelial dysplasia, and urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS). Classification along this continuous spectrum of atypia can be one of the most challenging areas in all genitourinary pathology. This review will focus on the diagnosis of urothelial CIS in routine clinical practice, emphasising histological criteria, histological spectrum (i.e., 'variant' types), adjunctive immunohistochemistry, intraoperative evaluation, and distinction from its morphological mimics.