Randomized clinical trial of the effect of the onset time of skin-to-skin contact at birth, immediate compared to early, on the duration of breastfeeding in full term newborns

Sociodemographic determinants associated with breastfeeding in term infants with low birth weight in Latin American countries

BACKGROUND

A progressive decrease in exclusive breastfeeding (BF) is observed in Latin America and the Caribbean compared with global results. The possibility of being breastfed and continuing BF for > 6 months is lower in low birth weight than in healthy-weight infants.

AIM

To identify factors associated with BF maintenance and promotion, with particular attention to low- and middle-income countries, by studying geographic, socioeconomic, and individual or neonatal health factors.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in 2018 using the conceptual model of social determinants of health published by the Commission on Equity and Health Inequalities in the United States. The extracted data with common characteristics were synthesized and categorized into two main themes: (1) Sociodemographic factors and proximal determinants involved in the initiation and maintenance of BF in low-birth-weight term infants in Latin America; and (2) individual characteristics related to the self-efficacy capacity for BF maintenance and adherence in low-birth-weight term infants.

RESULTS

This study identified maternal age, educational level, maternal economic capacity, social stratum, exposure to BF substitutes, access to BF information, and quality of health services as mediators for maintaining BF.

CONCLUSION

Individual self-efficacy factors that enable BF adherence in at-risk populations should be analyzed for better health outcomes.

Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding After Planned Cesarean Birth Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Benefits of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mother and newborn are widely documented, including improved breastfeeding outcomes. While promoting immediate SSC is standard practice for vaginal birth, it happens less often after cesarean birth. It is not known how changes in hospital practices and staffing shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic have influenced the practice of SSC in the operating room (OR). This study aims to identify the relationship between SSC after cesarean birth and breastfeeding and compare SSC before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single institution. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 244 subjects who had scheduled cesarean births during 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was newborn feeding at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were time to initiate breastfeeding, newborn feeding at 4-8-weeks postpartum, and location of SSC initiation in 2019 versus 2020. Results: SSC within 3 days of birth was significantly associated with feeding type on discharge and/or 4-8 weeks postpartum. More subjects intending to exclusively breastfeed met this intention at discharge with SSC in the OR. Newborns who had SSC in the OR had significantly earlier initiation of breastfeeding. There was an increase in SSC in the OR between 2019 (27%) and 2020 (39%). Conclusion: SSC in the OR was associated with improved short-term breastfeeding outcomes in our study. If immediate SSC is not possible, SSC within 3 days of birth may have breastfeeding benefits. The increase in SSC in the OR during the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that SSC practices can be implemented, despite challenging circumstances.

The Role of Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding in the First Hour Post Delivery in Reducing Excessive Weight Loss

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An excessive weight loss (EWL) of >10% after birth is associated with serious health outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine factors that can reduce weight loss in full-term, exclusively breastfed infants after birth.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational, single-center study. We included 642 healthy, full-term, exclusively breastfed neonates born in 2019 in a baby-friendly hospital, and their healthy mothers. The exclusion criteria were as follows: supplementation with formula, multiple pregnancies, and neonates or mothers with health issues.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of neonatal weight loss after 24 h of life was 5.13%, and that after 48 h was 6.34%. Neonates delivered via a caesarean section lost more weight after 24 and 48 h of life than those delivered via vaginal delivery (p < 0.01). There is a noticeable pattern that neonates tend to lose more weight if they do not get skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and breastfeeding within the first hour after birth (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates born via a CS tend to lose more weight after 24 and 48 h of life. Immediate SSC and breastfeeding in the first hour after delivery may decrease the excessive weight loss.

90 versus 60 min of early skin-to-skin contact on exclusive breastfeeding rate in healthy infants' ≥35 weeks: A randomised controlled trial

AIM

To compare the effect of 90 versus 60 min of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) among vaginally born healthy infants ≥35 weeks of gestation on their exclusive breastfeeding rates and breastfeeding behaviour.

METHODS

This parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial enrolled healthy term and late preterm infants born vaginally. Infants in the intervention group received early SSC for 90 min compared to 60 min in the control group. The primary outcome was the proportion of infants on exclusive breastfeeding at 60 ± 12 h.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-eight mother-infant dyads were randomised (99 in each group). The infants in the 90-min SSC group were more likely to be exclusively breastfed at 60 ± 12 h as compared to the 60-min SSC group (RR, 95% CI-1.44, [1.15-1.79], p < 0.01). The modified infant breastfeeding assessment tool score at 60 ± 12 h was significantly higher in the 90-min SSC group (median [IQR]-9, [8, 10] versus 8 [7, 10], p = 0.03]. The proportion of infants on exclusive breastfeeding at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age was also significantly higher in the 90-min SSC group (RR, 95% CI-1.39 [1.11-1.74], 1.36 [1.08-1.07], and 1.38 [1.08-1.75], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Increasing the duration of early SSC showed a dose-response benefit on exclusive breastfeeding rates and breastfeeding behaviour.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2018/09/015632, registered on 06/09/2018.

Effects of Exclusive Breastfeeding Promotion Interventions on Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Interventions promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) may benefit infant health outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of interventions promoting EBF on health outcomes in infants and children under 7 years of age.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were randomized or cluster-randomized controlled trials aiming to increase EBF that reported effects on offspring growth, morbidity, and/or mortality up to age 7 years. The primary outcome was infant/child growth. Secondary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality and EBF rates. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (40 papers) were identified. No effect on infant/child growth was observed. EBF promotion interventions significantly improved EBF rates up to 6 months (n = 25; OR 3.15; 95% CI: 2.36, 4.19) and significantly reduced the odds of respiratory illness at 0-3 months by 59% (n = 2; OR 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.84) but not at later time-points. A borderline significant effect was observed for diarrhea (n = 12; OR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00). Effects on hospitalizations or mortality were not significant.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

EBF promotion interventions improve EBF rates and might yield modest reductions in infant morbidity without affecting infant/child growth. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions and examine potential benefits on other health outcomes.

Implementing the Role of Neonatal Assessment Nurse to Improve Skin-to-Skin Care and Breastfeeding Exclusivity

OBJECTIVE

To improve rates of exclusive breastfeeding during the postpartum hospital stay by implementing a new role of dedicated neonatal assessment nurse (NAN), whose primary function was neonatal care beginning immediately after birth.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project with plan-do-study-act using evidence-based guidelines for implementing the NAN role.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

Labor and delivery department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in the southeastern United States; breastfeeding exclusivity rates at this hospital were in the range of 50%.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered nurses employed in the labor-delivery-recovery unit, mother-baby unit, and NICU.

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

The NAN role was implemented to promote immediate skin-to-skin care (SSC) for stable newborns after vaginal and cesarean birth. Each NAN's competency was evaluated at the beginning and end of the education session through a pretest/posttest, and a skills validation was used to affirm their readiness for the new role. The outcome measure was breastfeeding exclusivity at the time of discharge from the hospital. SSC initiation and duration immediately after birth were the process measures.

RESULTS

Twenty-five bedside registered nurses participated in this quality improvement project. There was a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores (p < .001), indicating a knowledge increase. All nurses met the skills validation criteria. The rate of SSC immediately after vaginal birth increased from 49% to 82% and after cesarean birth from 33% to 63%. Breastfeeding exclusivity rate at the time of discharge from the hospital increased from 50% to 86%.

CONCLUSION

The NAN role provided transitional care at the bedside without the separation of mothers and newborns. This was an innovative role, without the need to hire new staff, that provided evidence-based care, resulting in improved SSC and exclusivity of breastfeeding before discharge.

Análisis de Costo Efectividad del Contacto Piel a Piel al Nacimiento, Temprano vs Inmediato, en la Morbilidad Neonatal de Recién Nacidos de Bajo Riesgo

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immediate skin-to-skin contact compared with early skin-to-skin contact in the prevalent neonatal morbidity of the low-risk newborn in Colombia.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. The perspective of the third payer (health system) was used, and the time horizon was the first month of life. Low-risk term infants were included at birth. The cost estimate was obtained from an expert consensus and a retrospective cohort of neonates hospitalized in a neonatal unit. The effectiveness of the interventions was obtained from a clinical trial and was defined as an avoided case of hospitalization. A decision tree was built, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of the effects and costs were performed.

RESULTS

Early skin-to-skin contact was a dominated intervention. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, early skin-to-skin contact was not an option to choose in any scenario and it was dominated in 68% of the simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that early skin-to-skin contact is a dominated intervention. From an economic perspective, immediate skin-to-skin contact is a desired intervention for the prevention of prevalent diseases of the low-risk newborn at birth.

Comparison of the Effects of Different Skin-to-Skin Contact Onset Times on Breastfeeding Behavior

Objective: Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mother and child improves the rates of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in the neonatal period. This study evaluated the effects of two SSC onset times on breastfeeding behavior in the neonatal period. Materials and Methods: A multicenter clinical trial was conducted, with random allocation of participants to two different SSC onset times: immediate (at birth) and early (at 60 minutes of life). Low-risk neonates at birth were included. The researchers responsible for analyzing the data were blinded. The outcomes evaluated were early breastfeeding; EBF in the hospital, in the first week of life, and in the first month; and breastfeeding effectiveness in the neonatal period. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of the onset of SSC on breastfeeding indicators. The relative risk (RR) was reported as an effect measure. Results: A total of 297 neonates were included (immediate SSC, n = 148; and early SSC, n = 149). No differences were found in early breastfeeding (93.6% versus 90.6%; RR 1.6, 95% confidence interval 0.07-3.82), breastfeeding effectiveness, or EBF in the neonatal period. There was an earlier initiation of breastfeeding in the immediate SSC group (22 versus 27 minutes, p < 0.001). Conclusions: No differences in breastfeeding indicators in the neonatal period were observed between groups with different onset times of SSC (immediate versus early) in the neonatal sensitive period among low-risk neonates at birth. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02687685.