1
|
Proctor EK, Toker E, Tabak R, McKay VR, Hooley C, Evanoff B. Market viability: a neglected concept in implementation science. Implement Sci 2021; 16:98. [PMID: 34801036 PMCID: PMC8605560 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01168-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This debate paper asserts that implementation science needs to incorporate a key concept from entrepreneurship—market demand—and demonstrates how assessing an innovation’s potential market viability might advance the pace and success of innovation adoption and sustainment. We describe key concepts, language distinctions, and questions that entrepreneurs pose to implementation scientists—many of which implementation scientists appear ill-equipped to answer. The paper concludes with recommendations about how concepts from entrepreneurship, notably market viability assessment, can enhance the translation of research discoveries into real-world adoption, sustained use, and population health benefits. The paper further proposes activities that can advance implementation science’s capacity to draw from the field of entrepreneurship, along with the data foundations required to assess and cultivate market demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enola K Proctor
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
| | - Emre Toker
- Washington University Medical School in St. Louis and the University of Arizona, 1110 E. Campus Drive, P.O. Box 210033, Tucson, AZ, USA, 85721-0033
| | - Rachel Tabak
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Virginia R McKay
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Cole Hooley
- School of Social Work, Brigham Young University, 2166 JFSB, Provo, UT, 84602, USA
| | - Bradley Evanoff
- Division of General Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park KU, Birken S, Garvin J, Carson W, Paskett E. Practical Guide to Implementation Science for Surgical Oncologists: Case Study of Breast Cancer Short Stay Program. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:699-705. [PMID: 34297237 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10479-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long lags exist in adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions into real-world clinical practice based on oncology clinical trial results. Implementation science (IS) is a distinct field of health services research that aims to understand the barriers related to adoption of evidence-based guidelines and research in clinical practice. METHODS Use of IS study design, methods, and outcomes can be elusive to surgical oncologists despite the tremendous need for the application of IS to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap. This report describes key components of high-quality IS. RESULTS Herein, we illustrate how IS can be used in surgical oncology practice. Examples from implementation of the breast cancer Short Stay Program (SSP) in Netherlands is used to illustrate IS methods. Specific funding and training opportunities in implementation science are described in detail. CONCLUSION Use of IS in surgical oncology can help improve the uptake of evidence based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Un Park
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. .,The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Sarah Birken
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ling VB, Levi EE, Harrington AR, Zite NB, Rivas SD, Dalton VK, Smith R, Moniz MH. The cost of improving care: a multisite economic analysis of hospital resource use for implementing recommended postpartum contraception programmes. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 30:658-667. [PMID: 32878968 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The costs of quality improvement efforts in real-world settings are often unquantified. Better understanding could guide appropriate resource utilisation and drive efficiency. Immediate postpartum contraceptive care (ie, placement of an intrauterine device or contraceptive implant during hospitalisation for childbirth) represents an excellent case study for examining costs, because recommended services are largely unavailable and adoption requires significant effort. We therefore evaluated the cost of implementing immediate postpartum contraceptive services at four academic centres and one private hospital in USA. METHODS In this mixed-methods cost analysis, implementation activities were retrospectively identified using standardised data collection. Activities were categorised as preimplementation activities (infrastructure building, tool creation and stakeholder engagement) or execution activities (workforce training and process refinement). Costs were assigned based on national median salaries for the roles of individuals involved. Cross-case comparison and rapid qualitative analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were used to identify factors driving cost variation observed across sites. RESULTS On average, implementation activities required 204 hours (range 119-368), with this time costing $14 433.94 (range $9955.61-$23 690.49), and involving 9 (range 7-11) key team members per site. Preimplementation activities required more resources than execution activities (preimplementation: average 173 hours, $11 573.25; execution: average 31 hours, $2860.67). Sites that used lower-cost employees (eg, shifting tasks from a physician to a project manager) observed lower costs per hour for implementation activities. Implementation activities and costs were associated with local contextual factors, including stakeholder acceptance, integration of employees and infrastructure readiness for the change effort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide the first estimates of health system costs for adopting recommended contraceptive care in maternity units in USA. More broadly, our findings suggest that the budget impact of improvement efforts may vary widely depending on local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian B Ling
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erika E Levi
- Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Yeshiva University Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Amy R Harrington
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Nikki B Zite
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Tennessee Knoxville Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Saul D Rivas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, Texas, USA
| | - Vanessa K Dalton
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Roger Smith
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle H Moniz
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soi C, Babigumira JB, Chilundo B, Muchanga V, Matsinhe L, Gimbel S, Augusto O, Sherr K. Implementation strategy and cost of Mozambique's HPV vaccine demonstration project. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1406. [PMID: 31664976 PMCID: PMC6819423 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7793-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost is an important determinant of health program implementation. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the implementation strategy of Mozambique's school-based HPV vaccine demonstration project. We sought to estimate the total costs for the program, cost per fully immunized girl (FIG), and compute projections for the total cost of implementing a similar national level vaccination program. METHODS We collected primary data through document review, participatory observation, and key informant interviews at all levels of the national health system and Ministry of Education. We used a combination of micro-costing methods-identification and measurement of resource quantities and valuation by application of unit costs, and gross costing-for consideration of resource bundles as they apply to the number of vaccinated girls. We extrapolated the cost per FIG to the HPV-vaccine-eligible population of Mozambique, to demonstrate the projected total annual cost for two scenarios of a similarly executed HPV vaccine program. RESULTS The total cost of the Mozambique HPV vaccine demonstration project was $523,602. The mean cost per FIG was $72 (Credibility Intervals (CI): $62 - $83) in year one, $38 (CI: $37 - $40) in year two, and $54 CI: $49 - $61) for years one and two. The mean cost per FIG with the third HPV vaccine dose excluded from consideration was $60 (CI: $50 - $72) in year one, $38 (CI: $31 - $46) in year two, and $48 (CI: $42 - $55) for years one and two. The mean cost per FIG when only one HPV vaccine dose is considered was $30 (CI: $27 - $33)) in year one, $19 (CI: $15-$23) in year two, and $24 (CI: $22-$27) for both years. The projected annual cost of a two-and one-dose vaccine program targeting all 10-year-old girls in the country was $18.2 m (CI: $15.9 m - $20.7 m) and $9 m (CI: $8 m - $10 m) respectively. CONCLUSION National adaptation and scale-up of Mozambique's school-based HPV vaccine strategy may result in substantial costs depending on dosing. For sustainability, stakeholders will need to negotiate vaccine price and achieve higher efficiency in startup activities and demand creation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Soi
- Department of Global Health, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Health Alliance International, 1107 NE 45TH St #350, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
| | - Joseph B. Babigumira
- Department of Global Health, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Baltazar Chilundo
- Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Salvador Allende no. 702, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Vasco Muchanga
- Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Salvador Allende no. 702, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Luisa Matsinhe
- Health Alliance International, Rua Caetano Viegas no. 67, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Sarah Gimbel
- Department of Global Health, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Health Alliance International, 1107 NE 45TH St #350, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
- Department of Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Magnuson Health Sciences Building, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Orvalho Augusto
- Department of Global Health, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Salvador Allende no. 702, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Kenneth Sherr
- Department of Global Health, Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Health Alliance International, 1107 NE 45TH St #350, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
SUáREZ-Obando F, GóMEZ-Restrepo C, BOGOTá SERGMARCD. Implementation science: from evidence to practice. ACTA MEDICA COLOMBIANA : AMC : ORGANO DE LA ASOCIACION COLUMBIANA DE MEDICINA INTERNA 2018; 43:207-216. [PMID: 31285636 PMCID: PMC6614059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The wide range of scientific evidence supporting various clinical interventions is not sufficient for these interventions to be used in practice. For this reason, Evidence-Based Medicine must take the step towards Evidence-Based Practice, through implementation processes that allow deploying and contextualizing the health interventions supported by evidence. For this purpose, the Science of implementation has been developed, which investigates the factors that influence the effective and complete use of scientific innovations in practice, trying to maximize the benefits of health interventions. This science is defined as the study of methods that promote the systematic incorporation of research findings in the clinical routine, with the aim of improving the quality and effectiveness of health services and interventions. The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of Implementation Science in relation to clinical epidemiology and establish the reasons by which there is an urgent need for its development. In addition, it has the purpose of explaining why the need to accelerate the effective application of Evidence-Based Medicine and define the main models that define the scope of work of this science, including: the particularities of implementation studies, their differences with the classic studies of clinical epidemiology, the implementation and evaluation models, as well as the definition of expected outcomes in an implementation study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando SUáREZ-Obando
- Instituto de Genética Humana. Doctorado de Epidemiología Clínica, Departamento de Epidemiología y Bioestadística. Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
| | - Carlos GóMEZ-Restrepo
- Doctorado de Epidemiología Clínica, Departamento de Epidemiología y Bioestadística, Facultad de Medicina. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
| | - SERGíO MARíO Castro-DíAZ BOGOTá
- Doctorado de Epidemiología Clínica, Departamento de Epidemiología y Bioesta-dística, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá,D.C. (Colombia)
| |
Collapse
|