Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for high-risk central pulmonary metastases

The First Reported Case of Treating the Ultra-Central Thorax With Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the central and ultra-central thorax is associated with infrequent but potentially serious adverse events. Adaptive SBRT, which provides more precise treatment planning and inter-fraction motion management, may allow the delivery of ablative doses to ultra-central tumors with effective local control and improved toxicity profiles. Herein, we describe the first reported case of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) in the treatment of ultra-central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a prospective clinical trial (NCT05785845). An 80-year-old man with radiographically diagnosed early-stage NSCLC presented for definitive management of an enlarging ultra-central lung nodule. He was prescribed 55 Gy in five fractions with CT-STAR. A simulation was performed using four-dimensional CT, and patients were planned for treatment at end-exhale breath-hold. Treatment plans were generated using a strict isotoxicity approach, which prioritized organ at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. During treatment, daily CBCTs were acquired and used to generate adapted contours and treatment plans based on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day, all while the patient was on the treatment table. The initial and adapted plans were compared using dose-volume histograms, and the superior plan was selected for treatment. The adapted plan was deemed superior and used for treatment in three out of five fractions. The adapted plan provided improved target coverage in two fractions and resolved an OAR hard constraint violation in one fraction. We report the successful treatment of a patient with ultra-central NSCLC utilizing CT-STAR. This case report builds on previously published in silico data to support the viability and dosimetric advantages of CT-STAR in the ablative treatment of this challenging tumor location. Further data are needed to confirm the toxicity and efficacy of this technique.

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Magnetic Resonance Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Ultracentral Lung Tumors

Radiotherapy for ultracentral lung tumors represents a treatment challenge, considering the high rates of high-grade treatment-related toxicities with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or hypofractionated schedules. Accelerated hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) emerged as a potential game-changer for tumors in these challenging locations, in close proximity to central organs at risk, such as the trachea, proximal bronchial tree, and esophagus. In this series, 13 consecutive patients, predominantly male (n = 9), with a median age of 71 (range (R): 46-85), underwent 195 MRgART fractions (all 60 Gy in 15 fractions) to metastatic (n = 12) or primary ultra-central lung tumors (n = 1). The median gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were 20.72 cc (R: 0.54-121.65 cc) and 61.53 cc (R: 3.87-211.81 cc), respectively. The median beam-on time per fraction was 14 min. Adapted treatment plans were generated for all fractions, and indications included GTV/PTV undercoverage, OARs exceeding tolerance doses, or both indications in 46%, 18%, and 36% of fractions, respectively. Eight patients received concurrent systemic therapies, including immunotherapy (four), chemotherapy (two), and targeted therapy (two). The crude in-field loco-regional control rate was 92.3%. No CTCAE grade 3+ toxicities were observed. Our results offer promising insights, suggesting that MRgART has the potential to mitigate toxicities, enhance treatment precision, and improve overall patient care in the context of ultracentral lung tumors.

Widening the therapeutic window for central and ultra-central thoracic oligometastatic disease with stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Central/ultra-central thoracic tumors are challenging to treat with stereotactic radiotherapy due potential high-grade toxicity. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic window through motion control with breath-hold gating and real-time MR-imaging as well as the option for daily online adaptive replanning to account for changes in target and/or organ-at-risk (OAR) location.

MATERIALS/METHODS

26 central (19 ultra-central) thoracic oligoprogressive/oligometastatic tumors treated with isotoxic (OAR constraints-driven) 5-fraction SMART (median 50 Gy, range 35-60) between 10/2019-10/2022 were reviewed. Central tumor was defined as tumor within or touching 2 cm around proximal tracheobronchial tree (PBT) or adjacent to mediastinal/pericardial pleura. Ultra-central was defined as tumor abutting the PBT, esophagus, or great vessel. Hard OAR constraints observed were ≤ 0.03 cc for PBT V40, great vessel V52.5, and esophagus V35. Local failure was defined as tumor progression/recurrence within the planning target volume.

RESULTS

Tumor abutted the PBT in 31 %, esophagus in 31 %, great vessel in 65 %, and heart in 42 % of cases. 96 % of fractions were treated with reoptimized plan, necessary to meet OAR constraints (80 %) and/or target coverage (20 %). Median follow-up was 19 months (27 months among surviving patients). Local control (LC) was 96 % at 1-year and 90 % at 2-years (total 2/26 local failure). 23 % had G2 acute toxicities (esophagitis, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) and one (4 %) had G3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no G4-5 acute toxicities. There was no symptomatic pneumonitis and no G2 + late toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Isotoxic 5-fraction SMART resulted in high rates of LC and minimal toxicity. This approach may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk oligoprogressive/oligometastatic thoracic tumors.

Ten fraction hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for the management of ultracentral lung tumors: a retrospective analysis of dosimetry, outcomes, and toxicity

BACKGROUND

The management of ultracentral thoracic tumors with ablative dose of radiotherapy remains challenging given proximity to critical central structures. We report patient outcomes, toxicity, and dosimetry for ultracentrally located tumors with hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (hfSBRT).

METHODS

Seventy-eight individuals (50 initial radiotherapy, 28 re-irradiation) undergoing 10 fraction hfSBRT for ultracentrally located thoracic tumors treated between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were calculated. Incidence and grade of treatment related toxicity were evaluated. Dosimetric analysis of treatment plans and critical adjacent OARs was performed.

RESULTS

At a median follow up time of 13 months, 1- and 3-year OS, PFS, and LC were 89%/63%, 37%/18%, and 84%/65%, respectively. Median dose was 65 Gy (BED10 = 107.25 Gy). Median primary bronchial tree maximum dose (Dmax) was 60 Gy (V50 = 0.96 cc). Median esophageal Dmax was 38 Gy (V40 = 0 cc). Median great vessel Dmax was 68 Gy (V50 = 3.53 cc). The most common ≥ grade 2 adverse event was pneumonitis, in 15 individuals (20%). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 9 individuals (12%): three cases of grade 3 pneumonitis (two re-irradiation, one initial radiotherapy), one grade 3 esophageal stricture following re-irradiation, two grade 3 endobronchial obstructions both following initial radiotherapy, and three grade 5 hemoptysis events (two re-irradiation, one initial radiotherapy). One hemoptysis event was categorized as "possibly" related to treatment, while the remaining two events were categorized as "unlikely" related to treatment in patients with clear evidence of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

hfSBRT to ultracentral lung tumors delivered over 10 fractions is a safe and effective treatment option, with acceptable rates of toxicity and good rates of tumor control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRB registration number 12573.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Oligo-metastases: Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines

PURPOSE

A systematic review of treatment characteristics, outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases served as the basis for development of this International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed of retrospective series with ≥50 patients/lung metastases, prospective trials with ≥25 patients/lung metastases, analyses of specific high-risk situations, and all randomized trials published between 2012 and July 2022 in the MEDLINE or Embase database using the key words "lung oligometastases", "lung metastases", "pulmonary metastases", "pulmonary oligometastases", "stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)" and "stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT)". Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled outcomes estimates.

RESULTS

Of the 1884 articles screened, 35 analyses (27 retrospective-, 5 prospective, and 3 randomized trials) reporting on treatment of >3600 patients and >4650 metastases were included. The median local control was 90 % (Range: 57-100 %) at 1 year and 79 % (R: 70-96 %) at 5 years. Acute toxicity ≥3 was reported for 0.5 % and late toxicity ≥3 for 1.8 % of patients. A total of 21 practice recommendations covering the areas of staging & patient selection (n = 10), SBRT treatment (n = 10), and follow-up (n = 1) were developed, with agreements rates of 100 %, except for recommendation 13 (83 %).

CONCLUSION

SBRT represents an effective definitive local treatment modality combining high local control rates with low risk of radiation-induced toxicities.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location pose unique safety considerations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current safety and efficacy data and provide practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE databases of patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Studies reporting local control (LC) and/or toxicity were included. Studies with <5 treated lesions, non-English language, re-irradiation, nodal tumors, or mixed outcomes in which ultra-central tumors could not be discerned were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting relevant endpoints. Meta-regression was conducted to determine the effect of various covariates on the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

602 unique studies were identified of which 27 (one prospective observational, the remainder retrospective) were included, representing 1183 treated targets. All studies defined ultra-central as the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). The most common dose fractionations were 50 Gy/5, 60 Gy/8, and 60 Gy/12 fractions. The pooled 1- and 2-year LC estimates were 92 % and 89 %, respectively. Meta-regression identified biological effective dose (BED10) as a significant predictor of 1-year LC. A total of 109 grade 3-4 toxicity events, with a pooled incidence of 6 %, were reported, most commonly pneumonitis. There were 73 treatment related deaths, with a pooled incidence of 4 %, with the most common being hemoptysis. Anticoagulation, interstitial lung disease, endobronchial tumor, and concomitant targeted therapies were observed risk factors for fatal toxicity events.

CONCLUSION

SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors results in acceptable rates of local control, albeit with risks of severe toxicity. Caution should be taken for appropriate patient selection, consideration of concomitant therapies, and radiotherapy plan design.

Approaches to the Management of Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

High rates of recurrence and distant metastasis are a foremost challenge in the management of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), occurring in approximately 40% of all ACC patients. Despite the morbidity and mortality resulting from recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease, there are no FDA-approved systemic agents for these patients. In this review, we summarize pertinent ACC pathophysiology and its implications for different systemic treatment regimens in R/M ACC. We review the evidence for the most widely used systemic agents - cytotoxic chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting VEGFR - in addition to immune checkpoint inhibitors and non-TKI biologic agents. Exciting emerging targets for R/M ACC, including inhibitors of Notch signaling, stemness, PRMT5, and Axl, are also discussed. Lastly, we review local therapies for small-volume lung disease in patients with oligometastatic ACC, specifically pulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Future development of targeted molecular agents which exploit the underlying biology of this disease may yield novel therapeutic options to improve clinical outcomes in patients with R/M ACC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases

Although systemic therapy is standard management for patients with metastatic disease, several recent reports have indicated that an addition of local therapies including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) could improve survival. The lung is the most common site of distant metastasis from many solid tumors, and the strategy of SBRT, such as dose-fraction schedules, timing, etc., would be different depending on the type of primary tumor, location, and patterns of OMD. This review describes the role of SBRT with curative-intent for patients with pulmonary OMD for each of these variables. First, differences according to the type of primary tumor, for which many studies suggest that SBRT-mediated local control (LC) for patients with pulmonary OMD from colorectal cancer (CRC) is less successful than for those from non-CRC tumors. In addition, higher dose-fraction schedules seemed to correlate with higher LC; hence, different SBRT treatment strategies may be needed for patients with pulmonary OMD from CRC relative to other tumors. Second, differences according to location, where the safety of SBRT for peripheral pulmonary tumors has been relatively well established, but safety for central pulmonary tumors including pulmonary OMD is still considered controversial. To determine the optimal dose-fraction schedules, further data from prospective studies are still needed. Third, differences according to the patterns of OMD, the number of metastases and the timing of SBRT whereby 1–5 lesions in most patients and patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD are considered good candidates for SBRT. We conclude that there are still several problems in defining suitable indications for local therapy including SBRT, and that further prospective studies are required to resolve these issues.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases

30-60% of cancer patients develop lung metastases, mostly from primary tumors in the colon-rectum, lung, head and neck area, breast and kidney. Nowadays, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is considered the ideal modality for treating pulmonary metastases. When lung metastases are suspected, complete disease staging includes a total body computed tomography (CT ) and/or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET -CT ) scan. PET -CT has higher specificity and sensitivity than a CT scan when investigating mediastinal lymph nodes, diagnosing a solitary lung lesion and detecting distant metastases. For treatment planning, a multi-detector planning CT scan of the entire chest is usually performed, with or without intravenous contrast media or esophageal lumen opacification, especially when central lesions have to be irradiated. Respiratory management is recommended in lung SRT, taking the breath cycle into account in planning and delivery. For contouring, co-registration and/or matching planning CT and diagnostic images (as provided by contrast enhanced CT or PET-CT ) are useful, particularly for central tumors. Doses and fractionation schedules are heterogeneous, ranging from 33 to 60 Gy in 3-6 fractions. Independently of fractionation schedule, a BED10 > 100 Gy is recommended for high local control rates. Single fraction SRT (ranges 15-30 Gy) is occasionally administered, particularly for small lesions. SRT provides tumor control rates of up to 91% at 3 years, with limited toxicities. The present overview focuses on technical and clinical aspects related to treatment planning, dose constraints, outcome and toxicity of SRT for lung metastases.

Lobar Gross Endobronchial Disease Predicts for Overall Survival and Grade 5 Pulmonary Toxicity in Medically Inoperable Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered standard of care for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Central tumor location is a known risk factor for severe SBRT related toxicity. Bronchoscopy allows for visualization of the central airways prior to treatment. Five fraction SBRT approaches have been advocated to mitigate treatment induced toxicity. In this report, we examine the mature clinical outcomes of a diverse cohort of ES-NSCLC patients with both peripheral and central tumors treated with a conservative 5 fraction SBRT approach and evaluate the role of lobar gross endobronchial disease (LGED) in predicting overall survival and treatment-related death.

METHODS

Medically inoperable biopsy-proven, lymph node-negative ES-NSCLC patients were treated with SBRT. Bronchoscopy was completed prior to treatment in all centrally located cases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival was stratified based on clinical stage, histology, tumor location and LGED. Toxicities were scored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0.

RESULTS

From December 2010 to December 2015, 50 consecutive patients were treated uniformly with a 50 Gy in 5 fraction SBRT approach (tumor BED10 ≥ 100 Gy) and followed for a minimum of 5 years or until death. At a median follow up of 42 months for all patients, 3-year OS was 50%. Three-year OS did not statistically differ between stage I and stage II disease (51% vs. 47%; p=0.86), adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (50% vs. 45%; p=0.68), or peripheral and central tumors (56% vs. 45%; p=0.46). Five central tumors were found to have LGED, and 3-year OS for this cohort was quite poor at 20%. Cox regression analysis identified LGED as a predictor of OS while controlling for age, stage and location (OR:4.536, p-value=0.038). Despite the relatively low dose delivered, treatment likely contributed to the death of 4 patients with central tumors. Lobar gross endobronchial disease was an independent predictor for grade 5 pulmonary toxicity (n=4, p=0.007). Specifically, 3 of the 5 patients with LGED developed fatal radiation-induced bronchial stricture. Three-year LC, RC, DMFS and DFS results for the group were similar to contemporary studies at 90%, 90%, 82% and 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

Central location of ES-NSCLC is a well-established predictor for severe SBRT-related toxicity. Here we identify LGED as a significant predictor of poor overall survival and grade 5 pulmonary toxicity. The relatively high rates of severe treatment-related toxicity seen in patients with central ES-NSCLC may be due in part to LGED. Underlying LGED may cause irreparable damage to the lobar airway, unmitigated by SBRT treatment thus increasing the risk of severe treatment-related toxicity. These findings should be verified in larger data sets. Future prospective central ES-NSCLC clinical trials should require staging bronchoscopy to identify LGED and further assess its clinical significance.

Medical consequences of radiation exposure of the bronchi-what can we learn from high-dose precision radiation therapy?

The bronchial tolerance to high doses of radiation is not fully understood. However, in the event of a radiological accident with unintended exposure of the central airways to high doses of radiation it would be important to be able to anticipate the clinical consequences given the magnitude of the absorbed dose to different parts of the bronchial tree. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a radiation treatment technique involving a few large fractions of photon external-beam radiation delivered to a well-defined target in the body. Despite generally favourable results, with high local tumour control and low-toxicity profile, its utility for tumours located close to central thoracic structures has been questioned, considering reports of severe toxic symptoms such as haemoptysis (bleedings from the airways), bronchial necrosis, bronchial stenosis, fistulas and pneumonitis. In conjunction with patient- and tumour-related risk factors, recent studies have analysed the absorbed radiation dose to different thoracic structures of normal tissue to better understand their tolerance to these high doses per fraction. Although the specific mechanisms behind the toxicity are still partly unknown, dose to the proximal bronchial tree has been shown to correlate with high-grade radiation side effects. Still, there is no clear consensus on the tolerance dose of the different bronchial structures. Recent data indicate that a too high dose to a main bronchus may result in more severe clinical side effects as compared to a smaller sized bronchus. This review analyses the current knowledge on the clinical consequences of bronchial exposure to high dose hypofractionated radiation delivered with the SBRT technique, and the tolerance doses of the bronchi. It presents the current literature regarding types of high-grade clinical side effects, data on dose response and comments on other risk factors for high-grade toxic effects.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Lung Oligometastatic Disease: A Five-Year Systematic Review

For several years, oligometastatic disease has represented an intermediate state between localized disease accessible to local treatment and multimetastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. The lung represents one of the most common metastatic locations. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) appears to be the treatment of choice for these patients. There are few data defining the place of radiotherapy and reporting outcome after SBRT in lung metastases. This 5-year review aimed to determine areas of SBRT usefulness and methods for the management of pulmonary metastasis in oligometastatic patients. A search for articles on PubMed allowed selection of the most relevant studies. Eighteen articles were selected according to pre-established criteria for this purpose. The analysis concludes that SBRT is an effective and safe treatment in selected patients when the disease remains localized from one to three organs.

Current Evidence for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Lung Metastases

Lung metastases are the second most common malignant neoplasms of the lung. It is estimated that 20–54% of cancer patients have lung metastases at some point during their disease course, and at least 50% of cancer-related deaths occur at this stage. Lung metastases are widely accepted to be oligometastatic when five lesions or less occur separately in up to three organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive, safe, and effective treatment for metastatic lung disease in carefully selected patients. There is no current consensus on the ideal dose and fractionation for SBRT in lung metastases, and it is the subject of study in ongoing clinical trials, which examines different locations in the lung (central and peripheral). This review discusses current indications, fractionations, challenges, and technical requirements for lung SBRT.

Late Toxicity and Long-Term Local Control in Patients With Ultra-Central Lung Tumours Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy With Homogenous Dose Prescription

AIMS

To report late toxicity and long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with SABR for ultra-central tumours between May 2008 and April 2016. Ultra-central location was defined as tumour (GTV) abutting or involving trachea, main or lobar bronchi. Respiratory motion management and static-field dynamic-IMRT were used, with dose prescribed homogeneously (maximum <120%). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-five per cent of patients had inoperable primary non-small cell lung cancer and 35% had lung oligometastases. The median age was 72 (range 34-85) years. The median gross tumour volume and planning target volume (PTV) were 19.6 (range 1.7-203.3) cm³ and 57.4 (range 7.7-426.6) cm³, respectively. The most commonly used dose fractionation was 60 Gy in eight fractions (n = 51, 87.8%). Median BED₁₀ for D98%PTV and D2%PTV were 102.6 Gy and 115.06 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26.5 (range 3.2-100.5) months, fatal haemoptysis occurred in five patients (8.7%), of which two were directly attributable to SABR. A statistically significant difference was identified between median BED₃ for 4 cm³ of airway, for patients who developed haemoptysis versus those who did not (147.4 versus 47.2 Gy, P = 0.005). At the last known follow-up, 50 patients (87.7%) were without local recurrence. Freedom from local progression at 2 and 4 years was 92 and 79.8%, respectively. The median overall survival was 34.3 (95% confidence interval 6.1-61.6) months. Overall survival at 2 and 4 years was 55.1 and 41.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with high-risk ultra-central lung tumours, IMRT-based SABR with homogenous dose prescription achieves high local control, similar to that reported for peripheral tumours. Although fatal haemoptysis occurred in 8.7% of patients, a direct causality with SABR was evident in only 3%. Larger studies are warranted to ascertain factors associated with outcomes, especially toxicity, and identify patients who would probably benefit from this treatment.

The HILUS-Trial-a Prospective Nordic Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Ultracentral Lung Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy of thoracic tumors close to the central airways implies risk of severe toxicity. We report a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial for tumors located less than or equal to 1 cm from the proximal bronchial tree with primary end point of local control and secondary end point of toxicity.

METHODS

Stereotactic body radiation therapy with 7 Gy × 8 was prescribed to the 67% isodose encompassing the planning target volume. The patients were stratified to group A (tumors ≤ 1 cm from the main bronchi and trachea) or group B (all other tumors). Risk factors for treatment-related death were tested in univariate analysis, and a logistic regression model was developed for fatal bronchopulmonary bleeding versus dose to the main bronchi and trachea.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (group A/group B, n = 39/26) were evaluated. The median distance between the tumor and the proximal bronchial tree was 0 mm (0-10 mm). The 2-year local control was 83%. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 22 patients, including 10 cases of treatment-related death (bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, n = 8; pneumonitis, n = 1; fistula, n = 1). Dose to the combined structure main bronchi and trachea and tumor distance to the main bronchi were important risk factors. Dose modeling revealed minimum dose to the "hottest" 0.2 cc to the structure main bronchi and trachea as the strongest predictor for lethal bronchopulmonary hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the presented data, 7 Gy × 8, prescribed to the planning target volume-encompassing isodose, should not be used for tumors located within 1 cm from the main bronchi and trachea. Group B-type tumors may be considered for the treatment on the basis of an individual risk-benefit assessment and a maximum dose to the main bronchi and trachea in the order of 70 to 80 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions).

Dosimetric evaluation of SBRT treatment plans of non-central lung tumours: clinical experience

Objectives:

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women in North America. Surgery is usually the primary treatment option for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, for patients who may not be suitable candidates for surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an alternative method of treatment. SBRT has proven to be an effective technique for treating NSCLC patients by focally administering high radiation dose to the tumour with acceptable risk of toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. The goal of this comprehensive retrospective dosimetric study is to compare the dosimetric parameters between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung SBRT treatment plans for two prescription doses.

Methods:

We retrospectively analysed and compared lung SBRT treatment plans of 263 patients treated with either a 3DCRT non-coplanar or with 2–3 VMAT arcs technique at 48 Gy in 4 fractions (48 Gy/4) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (50 Gy/5) prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV), typically encompassing the 80% isodose volume. All patients were treated on either a Varian 21EX or TrueBeam linear accelerator using 6-MV or 10-MV photon beams.

Results:

The mean PTV V95% and V100% for treatment plans at 48 Gy/4 are 99·4 ± 0·6% and 96·0 ± 1·0%, respectively, for 3DCRT and 99·7 ± 0·4% and 96·4 ± 3·4%, respectively, for VMAT. The corresponding mean PTV V95% and V100% at 50 Gy/5 are 99·0 ± 1·4% and 95·5 ± 2·5% for 3DCRT and 99·5 ± 0·8% and 96·1 ± 1·6% for VMAT. The CIRI and HI5/95 for the PTV at 48 Gy/4 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The corresponding CIRI and HI5/95 at 50 Gy/5 are 1·1 ± 0·1 and 1·3 ± 0·1 for 3DCRT and 1·0 ± 0·1 and 1·2 ± 0·0 for VMAT. The mean R50% and D2cm at 48 Gy/4 are 5·0 ± 0·8 and 61·2 ± 7·0% for 3DCRT and 4·9 ± 0·8 and 57·8 ± 7·9% for VMAT. The corresponding R50% and D2cm at 50 Gy/5 are 4·7 ± 0·5 and 65·5 ± 9·4% for 3DCRT and 4·7 ± 0·7 and 60·0 ± 7·2% for VMAT.

Conclusion:

The use of 3DCRT or VMAT technique for lung SBRT is an efficient and reliable method for achieving dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off and minimising doses to the organs at risk. The VMAT technique resulted in improved dose conformity, rapid dose fall-off from the PTV compared to 3DCRT, although the magnitude may not be clinically significant.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Ultracentral Lung Tumors Using a Risk-optimized Fractionation Scheme

BACKGROUND

Delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to ultracentral lung tumors remains a major challenge, with potentially excessive SBRT-related toxicity. This study investigates a risk-optimized approach to ultracentral SBRT in an elderly and comorbid patient cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analysis encompassed 129 patients (mean age: 70 ± 11 years, median Charlson comorbidity index: 4 [range, 3-5]) following risk-adapted SBRT to central or ultracentral primary and secondary lung tumors between 2012 and 2019 (78 central, 51 ultracentral). Ultracentral tumors were defined by planning target volume overlap with the proximal bronchial tree. Whereas ultracentral tumors were treated with a risk-optimized fractionation scheme of 50 Gy in 10 fractions, central tumors received higher-fractionated 60 Gy in 8 fractions. Outcome parameters and toxicity for ultracentral and central tumors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analyses.

RESULTS

Local failure rate was not significantly increased in ultracentral tumors compared with central tumors (2-year local failure rate ultracentral, 26.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2%-44.2%; central, 14.6%; 95% CI, 6.6%-25.5%; P = .17). Overall survival was similar in both groups (2-year overall survival central, 55.4%; 95% CI, 44.5%-68.9%; ultracentral, 54.9%; 95% CI, 40.8%-73.9%; P = .6). Toxicity was moderate, with toxicity ≥ grade 3 rates of 15.3% (95% CI, 5.9%-28.9%) for ultracentral and 7.3% (95% CI, 2.7%-15.0%) for central tumors after 2 years (P = .27). No grade 4 toxicity and only 1 potential grade 5 toxicity were observed in the ultracentral cohort.

CONCLUSION

Risk-optimized SBRT to ultracentral lung tumors is a reasonably effective and safe treatment alternative in frail patients.

Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial in Ultra-Central lung tumors, a subset of central lung tumors characterized by proximity to critical mediastinal structures. This is of interest in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients, who can yield survival benefit from local treatments. The aim of our study is to assess the determinants of efficacy and toxicity in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and dosimetric parameters were reviewed in a cohort of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central tumors. Local control rate (LC) and toxicity were assessed. Statistical Analysis was carried out to assess the impact of those predictors on local recurrence and adverse events.

RESULTS

One-hundred-nine consecutive patients were included. A median Biologic Effective Dose (BED) of 105 (75-132) Gy10 was prescribed. At a median follow-up of 17 (range 3-78) months, 2-year LC was 87%. Improved LC was correlated to Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) covered by 95% of the prescription dose (V95% PTV) > 85% (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.0017) and to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) < 90 cm³ (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.0021). Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicity incidence was 20% and 5%, respectively. Patients experiencing acute and late toxicities received significantly higher dose to 1 cm³ (D1cm³) of esophagus and lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy (V5Gy) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013), and higher dose to 0.1 cm³ (D0.1cm³) of heart (p = 0.036), respectively.

CONCLUSION

V95% PTV > 85% and GTV < 90 cm³ are independent predictors of LC. Dose to esophagus, lung and heart should be carefully assessed to minimize treatment-related toxicities.

Ultra-central Thoracic Re-irradiation Using 10-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Tumors: Preliminary Toxicity and Efficacy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We report our clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors with ultra-central (UC) location treated with hypofractionated 10-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (hSBRT) in the context of thoracic re-irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted from 2009 to 2017 on 20 patients with recurrent NSCLC from previous thoracic radiation treatment who underwent hSBRT to 21 total UC located recurrent tumors. The planning target volumes (PTVs) that overlapped with previous treatment fields (within the 50% isodose line) were included in this analysis with endpoints of overall survival, tumor control, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 17.8 months. The median total dose of hSBRT and total biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) were 65 Gy and 107.25 Gy, respectively. The median time from previous treatment was 14.6 months. The 1-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 68%, 35%, and 83%, respectively. The median time to local progression was 13.3 months. The most common toxicity was grade 2 or above pneumonitis (35%). One patient, whose tumor was abutting the esophagus, experienced grade 3 esophagitis. Two (10%) patients died from "unlikely" treatment-related hemorrhage from local tumor progression at 10 and 24 months after hSBRT. Bronchoscopic evaluation of 1 patient suggested endobronchial tumor progression, and clear radiographic evidence of treated hilar tumor progression was documented in the second patient's case.

CONCLUSION

Despite having a high-risk population with recurrent ultra-central NSCLC tumors in the setting of re-irradiation, our results demonstrate that ablative doses of hSBRT may serve as a feasible option for these challenging cases and concur with current reported literature.

Dose-response relationship of stereotactic body radiotherapy for ultracentral tumor and comparison of efficacy with central tumor: a meta-analysis

Background

Ultracentral (UC) tumors, a subset of central lung tumors defined as those that abut the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), have been contraindicated for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The present meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of SBRT for UC and central tumors, and dose-response for local control (LC) of UC tumors.

Methods

Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to March, 2020, to identify studies regarding SBRT for UC and/or central tumors. The primary endpoints were LC and overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints were grade ≥3 and 5 complications.

Results

Fourteen studies including 892 patients were included. In the UC and central tumor groups, the 1-year OS rates were 82.2% and 85.4% (P=0.556), respectively, and the 2-year OS rates were 66.4% and 71.9% (P=0.522), respectively. The 1- and 2-year LC rates in the UC and central tumor groups were 93.9% and 97.8% (P=0.023) and 90.4% and 93.7% (P=0.459), respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 complication rates in the UC and central tumor groups were 9.0% and 4.4% (P=0.06), while the corresponding grade 5 complication rates were 5.7% and 2.1% (P=0.087). The dose-response for LC was shown in the meta-regression (P<0.0001), and 1-year LC rates were significantly different (94.4% vs. 59.3%, P<0.001) with very low heterogeneities in both subgroups, with threshold of 85 Gy10. Of the 28 fatalities, 12 (42.8%) were caused by hemorrhage or bronchial stenosis, and another 12 (42.8%) by pneumonia or respiratory failure.

Conclusions

The oncologic outcomes of patients with UC and central tumors were comparable post-SBRT. A dose of at least ≥85 Gy10 is recommended for SBRT of UC tumors. Causes of complications should be further studied as UC tumors are more prone to serious toxicities.

Low-dose hilar and mediastinal stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of outcomes in patients receiving one or multiple courses of treatment

Background

This study reports the outcomes of a single institutional experience treating non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving the pulmonary hilum with low‐dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The authors also present a series of repeat hilar SBRT.

Methods

Inclusion criteria required treatment with SBRT for NSCLC involving regional lymph nodes of the: (i) hilum, (ii) mediastinum, (iii) aortopulmonary window (station 5), or (iv) mainstem bronchus. At least one clinical follow‐up with imaging was required, unless the patient had a prior documented death from cancer.

Results

A total of 32 patients with 44 treatments were included, and 37 treatments targeted the hilum directly, with seven concerning the mediastinum, AP window, or mainstem bronchus. Median dose was 28 Gy in four fractions with once‐weekly fractionation. At a median clinical follow‐up of 23 months, local control was 64%. Median overall survival was 24 months, and median progression‐free survival was 15 months. A total of 48% of treatments resulted in complete radiographic response on last imaging follow‐up, and no cases of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. For repeat SBRT (after prior hilar SBRT), local control was 92%. Median overall survival was 20 months, and median progression‐free survival was 19 months. Complete radiographic response was noted after 58% of treatments, with 0 instances of progressive response and no reported side effects.

Conclusions

Low‐dose hilar SBRT was efficacious and well‐tolerated, with impressive overall survival and no grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Repeat treatments with SBRT were feasible and effective, demonstrating overall survival, local control, and toxicity comparable to primary treatments.

Key points

Pulmonary function in stereotactic body radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for primary and metastatic lung lesions

AIMS

This retrospective study reports outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT) for lung lesions. It promotes a dose escalation program.

METHODS

Histological and/or radiological findings and/or case histories identified 41 primary and 15 metastatic lesions. Thirty patients received 40 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 72 Gy_10Gy) and 26 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED 100Gy_10Gy). Primary end point was lung toxicity. Secondary end points were respiratory function, local control and local progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity developed in 18/56 patients and late toxicity in 8/54. Median FEV-1 variations versus baseline were - 0.5% (range - 16 to + 43%) at 6 months and - 4.00% (range - 42 to + 18%) at 24 months. Median DLCO variations versus baseline were - 1% (range - 38 to + 36%) at 6 months and - 12.2% (range - 48 to + 11%) at 24 months. At 6 months, a significant positive correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and KPS (p = 0.047). At 24 months, a significant negative correlation emerged between FEV-1 change and the ipsilateral lung V5 (p = 0.006). A low baseline DLCO correlated with more marked DLCO worsening at 6 months (p = 0.012). At 24 months, DLCO worsening correlated significantly with the median contralateral lung dose (p = 0.003). At the last checkup, 23 patients were in complete remission, 16 were in partial remission, 5 had stable disease, and 7 were in relapse. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 5-56).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with lung disease, SBRT, as delivered by HT, was well tolerated and provided good local control.

Radiation-Induced Secondary Cancer Risk Assessment in Patients With Lung Cancer After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using the CyberKnife M6 System With Lung-Optimized Treatment

Background

To evaluate the lifetime secondary cancer risk (SCR) of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the CyberKnife (CK) M6 system with a lung-optimized treatment (LOT) module for lung cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 11 lung cancer patients curatively treated with SBRT using the CK M6 robotic radiosurgery system. The planning treatment volume (PTV) and common organs at risk (OARs) for SCR analysis included the spinal cord, total lung, and healthy normal lung tissue (total lung volume - PTV). Schneider’s full model was used to calculate SCR according to the concept of organ equivalent dose (OED).

Results

CK-LOT-SBRT delivers precisely targeted radiation doses to lung cancers and achieves good PTV coverage and conformal dose distribution, thus posing limited SCR to surrounding tissues. The three OARs had similar risk equivalent dose (RED) values among four different models. However, for the PTV, differences in RED values were observed among the models. The cumulative excess absolute risk (EAR) value for the normal lung, spinal cord, and PTV was 70.47 (per 10,000 person-years). Schneider’s Lnt model seemed to overestimate the EAR/lifetime attributable risk (LAR).

Conclusion

For lung cancer patients treated with CK-LOT optimized with the Monte Carlo algorithm, the SCR might be lower. Younger patients had a greater SCR, although the dose–response relationship seemed be non-linear for the investigated organs, especially with respect to the PTV. Despite the etiological association, the SCR after CK-LOT-SBRT for carcinoma and sarcoma, is low, but not equal to zero. Further research is required to understand and to show the lung SBRT SCR comparisons and differences across different modalities with motion management strategies.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Lung Oligometastases in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in ultra-central (UC) lung tumors, defined in the presence of planning target volume (PTV) overlap or direct tumor abutment to the central bronchial tree or esophagus, may be correlated to a higher incidence of severe adverse events. Outcome and toxicity in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving SBRT for UC tumors were evaluated. Methods: Oligometastatic NSCLC patients treated with SBRT for UC were retrospectively reviewed. Local control (LC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Incidence and grade of toxicity were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of clinical and treatment-related variables on outcome and toxicity occurrence. Results: Seventy-two patients were treated to a median biologically effective dose (BED) of 105 (75–132) Gy¹⁰. Two-year LC, DMFS, PFS, and OS were 83%, 46%, 43%, and 49%. BED>75 Gy¹⁰ was correlated to superior LC (p = 0.02), PFS (p = 0.036), and OS (p < 0.001). Grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 7%, including one fatal esophagitis. No variables were correlated to DMFS or to occurrence of overall and grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusions: SBRT using dose-intensive schedules improves outcome in NSCLC patients. Overall toxicity is acceptable, although rare but potentially fatal toxicities may occur.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for moderately central and ultra-central oligometastatic disease: Initial outcomes

BACKGROUND

Delivery of SBRT to central thoracic tumours within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), and especially ultra-central tumours which directly abut the PBT, has been controversial due to concerns about high risk of toxicity and treatment-related death when delivering high doses close to critical mediastinal structures. We present dosimetric and clinical outcomes from a group of oligometastatic patients treated with a risk-adapted SBRT approach.

METHODS

Between September 2015 and October 2018, 27 patients with 28 central thoracic oligometastases (6 moderately central, 22 ultra-central) were treated with 60 Gy in 8 fractions under online CBCT guidance. PTV dose was compromised where necessary to meet mandatory OAR constraints. Patients were followed up for toxicity and disease status.

RESULTS

Mandatory OAR constraints were met in all cases; this required PTV coverage compromise in 23 cases, with V100% reduced to <70% in 11 cases. No acute or late toxicities of Grade ≥ 3 were reported. One and 2 year in-field control rates were 95.2% and 85.7% respectively, progression-free survival rates were 42.8% and 23.4% respectively, and overall survival rates were 82.7% and 69.5% respectively. No significant differences were seen in control or survival rates by extent of PTV underdosage or between moderately and ultra-central cases.

CONCLUSION

It appears that compromising PTV coverage to meet OAR constraints allows safe and effective delivery of SBRT to moderately and ultra-central tumours, with low toxicity rates and high in-field control rates. This treatment can be delivered on standard linear accelerators with widely available imaging technology.

Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy in 8 fractions when prioritizing organs at risk for central and ultracentral lung tumors

BACKGROUND

For stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to central (C) and ultracentral (UC) lung tumors, our provincial practice has been to prioritize organs at risk (OARs) constraints by compromising target volume coverage if needed. The objectives are to report the treatment's efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all provincial patients who underwent SBRT at 60Gy in 8 fractions to C and UC lung tumors, from 2013 to 2017.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight lesions were treated, 57 (58.2%) C and 41 (41.8%) UC. The median follow-up was 22.9 months (range 2.5-64.8 months). The 1- and 3-year local control (LC) was 97.8 and 84.5% respectively, with no differences between C and UC groups (p = 0.662). Fifty-three (54.1%) cases had optimal dose coverage (V60Gy ITV&PTV > 95%), 29 (29.6%) had compromised PTV coverage (V60Gy ITV > 95%/PTV < 95%), and 16 (16.3%) had both compromised ITV and PTV coverage (V60Gy ITV&PTV < 95%). No significant difference in LC was detected at 2 years between the 3 groups (95.6, 91.8 and 90.9%, p = 0.717). There were 3 episodes of grade 3 toxicity in the C group (2 dyspnea, 1 pneumonitis) and 2 in the UC group (1 dyspnea, 1 hemoptysis). There were no gr4/5 toxicities. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, ITV size was found to be a predictor for LC (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT at 60Gy in 8 fractions achieves high rates of LC with low risks of significant toxicities, even if target volume coverage is reduced to meet OARs constraints.

Radiotherapy in the control of bleeding from primary and secondary lung tumours

This literature review clarifies the role of radiotherapy in the management of low-volume haemoptysis. Embase and Medline were interrogated, and PRISMA guidelines were then used to select relevant articles. Seventy-eight articles were considered relevant and manually reviewed. The evidence suggests that external beam radiotherapy is more effective than endobronchial brachytherapy at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. There is no evidence to recommend a combination of the two techniques. Different doses and fractionations appear equally effective, with a potential survival advantage of higher dose regimens for fitter patients. Palliative radiotherapy is effective at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. External beam radiotherapy is the first-line treatment, with endobronchial brachytherapy recommended following external beam radiotherapy failure. Choice of dose and fractionation should take into account the patient's performance status.

Surgery or radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer? An intention-to-treat analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer, with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) a lower morbidity alternative for patients with limited physiological reserve. Comparisons of outcomes between these treatment options are limited by competing comorbidities and differences in pre-treatment pathological information. This study aims to address these issues by assessing both overall and cancer-specific survival for presumed stage I lung cancer on an intention-to-treat basis.

METHODS

This retrospective intention-to-treat analysis identified all patients treated for presumed stage I lung cancer within a single large UK centre. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and combined cancer and treatment-related survival were assessed with adjustment for confounding variables using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks analyses.

RESULTS

468 patients (including 316 surgery and 99 SABR) were included in the study population. Compared with surgery, SABR was associated with inferior overall survival on multivariable Cox modelling (SABR HR 1.84 (95% CI 1.32-2.57)), but there was no difference in cancer-specific survival (SABR HR 1.47 (95% CI 0.80-2.69)) or combined cancer and treatment-related survival (SABR HR 1.27 (95% CI 0.74-2.17)). Combined cancer and treatment-related death was no different between SABR and surgery on Fine-Gray competing risks multivariable modelling (subdistribution hazard 1.03 (95% CI 0.59-1.81)). Non-cancer-related death was significantly higher in SABR than surgery (subdistribution hazard 2.16 (95% CI 1.41-3.32)).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, no difference in cancer-specific survival was observed between SABR and surgery. Further work is needed to define predictors of outcome and help inform treatment decisions.

Outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced stage ultra-central non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented a high incidence of toxicity in patients with ultra-central non-small cell lung cancer (UC-NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, these studies mainly focused on early stage patients and included small sample populations. We reviewed the outcomes and toxicity of SBRT in patients with advanced stage UC-NSCLC treated at our institution.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with advanced UC-NSCLC treated with SBRT using a regular regimen of 35 Gy administered in five fractions between December 2014 and August 2017 were reviewed. UC was defined as tumors abutting or overlapping the trachea or the proximal bronchial tree. We included locally advanced patients who were unfit or unwilling to receive conventional chemoradiotherapy and patients with metastatic or postoperative recurrent disease. Clinical outcomes, dosimetric parameters, and SBRT toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years (range: 35-82), and the median tumor diameter was 6.8 cm (range: 2.1-12.4). The overall median follow-up duration was 17 months (25.5 months for surviving patients). The median local control was 17 months for stage III patients and 11 months for stage IV or recurrent patients. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 9.8% of patients: G3 radiation pneumonitis (5.9%) and possible treatment-related death (3.9%).

CONCLUSION

SBRT with a moderate dose in 4-6 fractions is effective and tolerable for patients with advanced stage UC-NSCLC. However, caution should be taken considering possible treatment-related death. Further studies are warranted.

Safety and Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumors is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review to summarize existing data and identify trends in treatment-related toxicity and local control following SABR in patients with ultra-central lung lesions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases. The databases were queried from dates of inception until September 27, 2018. Studies in the English language that reported treatment-related toxicity and local control outcomes post-SABR for patients with ultra-central lung lesions were included. Guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences, studies focused on re-irradiation, and studies with fewer than five patients were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 446 studies were identified, with 10 meeting all criteria for inclusion. The total sample size from the identified studies was 250 ultra-central lung patients and all studies were retrospective in design. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation ranged from 30 to 60 Gy in 3 to 12 fractions, with biologically effective doses (BED₁₀) ranging from 48 to 138 Gy₁₀ (median, 78-103 Gy₁₀). Median treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity was 10% (range, 0-50%). Median treatment-related mortality was 5% (range, 0-22%), most commonly from pulmonary hemorrhage (55%). High-risk indicators for SABR-related mortality included gross endobronchial disease, maximum dose to the proximal bronchial tree greater than or equal to 180 Gy₃ (BED₃, corresponding to 45 Gy in 5 fractions or 55 Gy in 8 fractions), peri-SABR bevacizumab use, and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Median 1-year local control rate was 96% (range, 63%-100%) and 2-year local control rate was 92% (range, 57%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR for ultra-central lung lesions appears feasible but there is a potential for severe toxicity in patients receiving high doses to the proximal bronchial tree, those with endobronchial disease, and those receiving bevacizumab or anticoagulants around the time of SABR. Prospective studies are required to establish the optimal doses, volumes, and normal tissue tolerances for SABR in this patient population.

Cyberknife® stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: evaluation of local control at 24 months

Background

CyberKnife^® stereotactic radiotherapy allows for minimally invasive treatment with satisfactory results in patients with inoperable primary or metastatic lung cancer. The objective of this study was to identify factors influencing the probability of local control.

Methods

Ninety-five patients (100 lung tumors) treated between January and December 2013 at our department by SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) using CyberKnife^® were included in the study. There were 71 stage T1 or T2 primary tumors and 29 secondary tumors. The tracking methods were as follow: fiducial markers with Synchrony^® in 50 cases (gold seeds in 35, coils in 15 cases), spine with 4D-CT and Xsight^® Spine in 43 cases, and direct viewing by Xsight^® Lung in 7 cases. The methods were allocated according to the characteristics of each target.

Results

With a median follow-up of 24 months, the probability of local control at 24 months was 88%. The probability of local control differed according to the size of the target (92% for tumors ≤35 mm and 54% for tumors >35 mm: P=0.013) and according to the distance of the fiducial markers in relation to the target (95% when <50 mm and 69% when ≥50 mm: P=0.011).

Conclusions

The best results were obtained with small lesions. With Synchrony^®, the distance of the target relative to the fiducial markers should be less than 50 mm. Gold seeds are recommended, although coils may be used instead of gold seeds. The number of fiducial markers did not have a significant impact on the probability of local control. With an appropriate tracking method, stereotactic radiotherapy is an efficient treatment for stage I lung cancer and lung oligometastases.

The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for central versus ultracentral lung tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent studies have postulated that patients undergoing lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ultracentral tumors have higher toxicity and mortality rates than those with central tumors. Our aim was to compare the outcomes after lung SBRT for central versus ultracentral tumors in our own series.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumors treated with SBRT from 1 September 2009 to 30 June 2015. Patients were included if they were treated with five-fraction SBRT to central or ultracentral tumors. Central tumors were defined as tumors where the closest point was within 2 cm of (but not abutting) the proximal bronchial tree, or within 2 cm of (whether abutting or not) mediastinal structures. Ultracentral tumors were defined as tumors abutting the proximal bronchial tree. The 2-year overall survival (OS), 2-year local failure (LF), and 2-year grade ≥3 toxicity rates were compared between patients with central and ultracentral tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 2-year OS between the two groups, with 2-year OS 57.7% for central tumors, and 50.4% for ultracentral tumors (p = 0.10). There were no significant differences in 2-year LF between the two groups, with 2-year LF 3.4% for central tumors and 4.3% for ultracentral tumors (p = 0.92). There were no significant differences in 2-year grade ≥3 toxicity rate for the two groups, with 3.5% with central tumors and 8.7% with ultracentral tumors (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in OS, LF, or grade ≥3 toxicity between patients with central and ultracentral lung tumors. Although these results indicate that SBRT for ultracentral tumors may be safe, caution should be applied in selecting and treating these patients until the completion of large prospective trials.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for ultra-central lung tumors: prioritize target coverage or organs at risk?

Background

Lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is associated with low morbidity, however there is an increased risk of treatment-related toxicity in tumors directly abutting or invading the proximal bronchial tree, termed ‘ultra-central’ tumors. As there is no consensus regarding the optimal radiotherapy treatment regimen for these tumors, we performed a modeling study to evaluate the trade-offs between predicted toxicity and local control for commonly used high-precision dose-fractionation regimens.

Methods

Ten patients with ultra-central lung tumors were identified from our institutional database. New plans were generated for 3 different hypofractionated schemes: 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 60 Gy in 8 fractions and 60 Gy in 15 fractions. For each regimen, one plan was created that prioritized planning target volume (PTV) coverage, potentially at the expense of organ at risk (OAR) tolerance, and a second that compromised PTV coverage to respect OAR dose constraints. Published radiobiological models were employed to evaluate competing treatment plans based on estimates for local control and the likelihood for toxicity to OAR.

Results

The risk of esophageal or pulmonary toxicity was low (< 5%) in all scenarios. When PTV coverage was prioritized, tumor control probabilities were 92.9% for 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 92.4% for 60 Gy in 8 fractions, and 52.0% for 60 Gy in 15 fractions; however the estimated risk of grade ≥ 4 toxicity to the proximal bronchial tree was 68%, 44% and 2% respectively. When dose to OAR was prioritized, the risk of major pulmonary toxicity was reduced to < 1% in all schemes, but this compromise reduced tumor control probability to 60.3% for 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 65.7% for 60 Gy in 8 fractions and 47.8% for 60 Gy in 15 fractions.

Conclusions

The tradeoff between local control and central airway toxicity are considerable in the use of 3 commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens for ultra-central lung cancer. The results of this planning study predict that the best balance may be achieved with 60 Gy in 8 fractions compromising PTV coverage as required to maintain acceptable doses to OAR. A prospective phase I trial (SUNSET) is planned to further evaluate this challenging clinical scenario.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1001-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fiducial marker placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy via convex probe endobronchial ultrasound: a case series and review of literature

Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are valuable tools in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of thoracic malignancies. With widespread clinical adoption, novel uses of CP-EBUS beyond mediastinal diagnosis and staging continue to be discovered. SBRT is an attractive treatment strategy in early-stage lung cancer and oligo-metastatic disease of the chest when a surgical approach is either not feasible or desirable. Accurate application of SBRT is aided by the placement of radio-opaque fiducial markers (FM) to compensate for respiratory cycle movements. We describe eight patients with central thoracic lesions, either known or suspected to be malignant, who underwent EBUS bronchoscopy with lesion sampling and successful intralesional placement of modified FM via our technique, review the existing literature on this topic, and discuss the nuances of coding and billing aspects of FM placement.

Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modeling of Pulmonary Toxicity After Stereotactic and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Central Lung Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical pulmonary and radiographic bronchial toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy and hypofractionated radiation therapy for central lung tumors, and perform normal tissue complication probability modeling and multivariable analyses to identify predictors for toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A pooled analysis was performed of patients with a central lung tumor treated using ≤12 fractions at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. Airways were manually contoured on planning computed tomography scans, and doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction with an α/β ratio of 3. Grade ≥3 (≥G3) clinical pulmonary toxicity was evaluated by 2 or more physicians. Radiographic toxicity was defined as a stenosis or an occlusion with or without atelectasis using follow-up computed tomography scans. Logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 585 bronchial structures were studied in 195 patients who were mainly treated using 5 or 8 fractions (60%). Median patient survival was 27.9 months (95% confidence interval 22.3-33.6 months). Clinical ≥G3 toxicity was observed in 24 patients (12%) and radiographic bronchial toxicity in 55 patients (28%), both mainly manifesting ≤12 months after treatment. All analyzed dosimetric parameters correlated with clinical and lobar bronchial radiographic toxicity, with V_130Gy,EQD having the highest odds ratio. Normal tissue complication probability modeling showed a volume dependency for the development of both clinical and radiographic toxicity. On multivariate analyses, significant predictors for ≥G3 toxicity were a planning target volume overlapping the trachea or main stem bronchus (P = .005), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .034), and the total V_130Gy,EQD (P = .012). Radiographic bronchial toxicity did not significantly correlate with clinical toxicity (P = .663).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified patient and dosimetric factors associated with clinical and radiographic toxicity after high-dose radiation therapy for central lung tumors. Additional data from prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

High Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy is a Safe and Feasible Treatment for Central Lung Cancer

Background

There have been few reports about high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The aim of this study was to examine retrospectively the safety and efficacy of high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer.

Patients and methods

Patients treated by proton beam therapy for central lung cancer located less than 2 cm from the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or lobe bronchus were included in this study. All patients received 80 Gy of relative biological dose effectiveness (RBE) in 25 fractions with proton beam therapy over 5 weeks between January 2009 and February 2015. The toxicities were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.

Results

Twenty patients, including 14 clinically inoperable patients (70%), received proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The median patient age was 75 years (range: 63–90 years), the median follow up time was 27.5 months (range: 12–72 months), and the median tumor diameter was 39.5 mm (range: 24–81 mm). All patients were followed for at least 20 months or until death. The 2-year overall survival rate was 73.8% (100% in operable patients, and 62.5% in inoperable patients), and the 2-year local control rate was 78.5%. There was no Grade 3 or higher toxicities, including bronchial stricture, obstruction, and fistula.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that a high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer was safe and feasible.

Radiobiological parameters of liver and lung metastases derived from tumor control data of 3719 metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The radiobiological parameters for liver and lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are poorly defined. This project aimed at estimating these parameters from published tumor control probability (TCP) data, and separately for metastases with colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-CRC histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 62 studies with 89 different treatment prescriptions for a total of 3719 metastases were analyzed in a Bayesian framework using four different radiobiological models: The LQ, mLQ, LQ-L and the regrowth model which accounts for tumor regrowth after SBRT.

RESULTS

Depending on the particular model, α/β ratios in the range 13-23Gy for pulmonary metastases and 16-28Gy for hepatic metastases were estimated. For CRC metastases the estimated α/β ratio was 43.1±4.7Gy compared to 21.6±7.8Gy for non-CRC metastases. Typical isocenter dose prescriptions of 3×12Gy, 3×14.5Gy and 3×17Gy applied within 5days were predicted sufficient to control 90% of lung, liver and CRC metastases after 1yr, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

α/β ratios for liver and lung metastases are higher than the usually assumed 10Gy. Differences between CRC and non-CRC histology were found. Future studies confirming these findings in individual patient data are needed.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Lung Metastases: Where is the Evidence and What are We Doing With It?

This review provides an overview of the use of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for pulmonary metastases. The local control rates after SABR are generally >90%. Whether this also translates into a significant improvement in overall survival is the subject of ongoing studies. New exciting opportunities including the integration of SABR with targeted and immune therapies as well as some competing treatment strategies are discussed.