Clinical application of an institutional fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) program for brain metastases delivered with MRIdianⓇ BrainTx™

Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated SRS (FSRS) are well established strategies for patients with limited brain metastases. A broad spectrum of modern dedicated platforms are currently available for delivering intracranial SRS/FSRS; however, SRS/FSRS delivered using traditional CT-based platforms relies on the need for diagnostic MR images to be coregistered to planning CT scans for target volume delineation. Additionally, the on-board image guidance on traditional platforms yields limited inter-fraction and intra-fraction real-time visualization of the tumor at the time of treatment delivery. MR Linacs are capable of obtaining treatment planning MR and on-table MR sequences to enable visualization of the targets and organs-at-risk and may subsequently help identify anatomical changes prior to treatment that may invoke the need for on table treatment adaptation. Recently, an MR-guided intracranial package (MRIdian A3i BrainTxTM) was released for intracranial treatment with the ability to perform high-resolution MR sequences using a dedicated brain coil and cranial immobilization system. The objective of this report is to provide, through the experience of our first patient treated, a comprehensive overview of the clinical application of our institutional program for FSRS adaptive delivery using MRIdian's A3i BrainTx system-highlights include reviewing the imaging sequence selection, workflow demonstration, and details in its delivery feasibility in clinical practice, and dosimetric outcomes.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Magnetic Resonance Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Ultracentral Lung Tumors

Radiotherapy for ultracentral lung tumors represents a treatment challenge, considering the high rates of high-grade treatment-related toxicities with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or hypofractionated schedules. Accelerated hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) emerged as a potential game-changer for tumors in these challenging locations, in close proximity to central organs at risk, such as the trachea, proximal bronchial tree, and esophagus. In this series, 13 consecutive patients, predominantly male (n = 9), with a median age of 71 (range (R): 46-85), underwent 195 MRgART fractions (all 60 Gy in 15 fractions) to metastatic (n = 12) or primary ultra-central lung tumors (n = 1). The median gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were 20.72 cc (R: 0.54-121.65 cc) and 61.53 cc (R: 3.87-211.81 cc), respectively. The median beam-on time per fraction was 14 min. Adapted treatment plans were generated for all fractions, and indications included GTV/PTV undercoverage, OARs exceeding tolerance doses, or both indications in 46%, 18%, and 36% of fractions, respectively. Eight patients received concurrent systemic therapies, including immunotherapy (four), chemotherapy (two), and targeted therapy (two). The crude in-field loco-regional control rate was 92.3%. No CTCAE grade 3+ toxicities were observed. Our results offer promising insights, suggesting that MRgART has the potential to mitigate toxicities, enhance treatment precision, and improve overall patient care in the context of ultracentral lung tumors.

Ablative 5-Fraction CT vs. MR-Guided Pancreatic SBRT: Evaluation of Interfraction Anatomic Changes on Dosimetric Constraints

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

CT-guided SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is usually non-ablative (BED < 100 Gy10) to minimize grade 3+ toxicity risks given the concern of interfraction anatomic changes (IACs) in GI anatomy and imaging quality associated with kV-CBCT. Emerging data demonstrate that MR guidance facilitates 5-fraction (fx) dose escalation due to superior soft tissue contrast, continuous intrafraction imaging, automatic beam gating, and on-table adaptive replanning capability. Treatment outcomes for ablative 5-fx CT- vs. MR-guided SBRT are not well characterized, nor are differences in predicted GI OAR doses when accounting for IACs.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Weevaluated 40 plans (20 CT, 20 MR) for 20 LAPC patients (pts) previously treated in breath hold (BH) on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Prescribed dose was 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective) in 5 fx using a simultaneous integrated boost technique. CT plans were retrospectively created using 2-3 VMAT arcs with the same prescription dose, target volumes (assuming BH), and constraints (prioritizing OARs over target coverage) as the MR IMRT plans (∼20-40 fields). CT planners were blinded to MR plans. We compared predicted GI OAR dose of CT vs. MR plans across each of the 5 fx for all 20 patients to evaluate the dosimetric impact of IACs by coregistering CT plans to the anatomy of the day based on 0.35T MR scans acquired for GI OAR segmentation and treatment delivery.

RESULTS

MedianV100% of the GTV, CTV, PTV50, and PTV33 across the original CT vs. MR plans were 97.5% vs. 91.3% (p = 0.017), 99.9% vs. 98.2% (p<0.01), 86.2% vs. 79.3% (p = 0.39), and 97.2% vs. 93.0% (p<0.01), respectively. GI OAR constraints were met for all original CT/MR plans although it was predicted that 1+ GI OAR constraint would be violated (most commonly duodenum) for 88/100 CT vs. 85/100 MR fractions. Across the 88 violated CT fractions, the median predicted GI OAR doses were duodenum V35: 3.3 cc (range: 0.16-18.0cc), duodenum V40: 1.2 cc (range: 0.01-11.9cc), small bowel V35: 1.2 cc (range: 0.4-10.9cc), small bowel V40: 0.2 cc (range: 0.04-7.0cc), stomach V35: 1.5 cc (range: 0.52-6.8cc), stomach V40: 0.3 cc (range: 0.05-2.8cc). GI OAR doses across the 85 violated MR fractions were similar. Median fxs per pt with 1+ predicted GI OAR violation was 5 (range: 1-5) for both CT and MR plans.

CONCLUSION

This isthe first evaluation of IAC effects on predicted GI OAR dose for 5-fx CT- vs. MR-guided SBRT. Although VMAT arcs facilitated higher target coverage in the initial CT plans, GI OAR constraint violations were observed in 85-88% of CT/MR plans. Although on-table adaptive replanning is routine on MR-guided Linacs it is not commonly available on CT-guided Linacs. As such, ablative 5-fx SBRT delivered with CT guidance is expected to result in significant toxicity due to exceeding GI OAR constraints for most delivered fractions.

Treatment of glioblastoma using MRIdian® A3i BrainTx™: Imaging and treatment workflow demonstration

For patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the current standard-of-care includes maximal safe resection, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, with tumor treating fields. Traditionally, diagnostic imaging is performed pre- and post-resection, without additional dedicated longitudinal imaging to evaluate tumor volumes or other treatment-related changes. However, the recent introduction of MR-guided radiotherapy using the ViewRay MRIdian A3i system includes a dedicated BrainTx package to facilitate the treatment of intracranial tumors and provides daily MR images. We present the first reported case of a glioblastoma imaged and treated using this workflow. In this case, a 67-year-old woman underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after gross total resection of a left frontal glioblastoma. The radiotherapy treatment plan consisted of a traditional two-phase design (46 Gy followed by a sequential boost to a total dose of 60 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction). The treatment planning process, institutional workflow, treatment imaging, treatment timelines, and target volume changes visualized during treatment are presented. This case example using our institutional A3i system workflow successfully allows for imaging and treatment of primary brain tumors and has the potential for margin reduction, detection of early disease progression, or to detect the need for dose adaptation due to interfraction tumor volume changes.

Initial clinical experience with magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in pediatric patients: Lessons learned from a single institution with proton therapy

Purpose/Objectives

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is increasingly used in a variety of adult cancers. To date, published experience regarding the use of MRgRT in pediatric patients is limited to two case reports. We report on the use of MRgRT for pediatric patients at our institution during a four-year period and describe important considerations in the selection and application of this technology in children.

Materials/Methods

All patients treated with MRgRT since inception at our institution between 4/2018 and 4/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We also evaluated all pediatric patients treated at our institution during the same period who received either imaging or treatment using our magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR Linac). We summarize four clinical cases where MRgRT was selected for treatment in our clinic, including disease outcomes and toxicities and describe our experience using the MR Linac for imaging before and during treatment for image fusion and tumor assessments.

Results

Between 4/2018 and 4/2022, 535 patients received MRgRT at our center, including 405 (75.7%) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). During this period, 347 distinct radiotherapy courses were delivered to pediatric patients, including 217 (62.5%) with proton therapy. Four pediatric patients received MRgRT. One received SABR for lung metastasis with daily adaptive replanning and a second was treated for liver metastasis using a non-adaptive workflow. Two patients received fractionated MRgRT for an ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and neuroblastoma. No Grade 2 or higher toxicities were observed or reported during MRgRT or subsequent follow-up. Twelve patients underwent MR imaging without contrast during treatment for brain tumors to assess for tumor/cystic changes. Two patients treated with other modalities underwent MR simulation for target volume delineation and organ at risk sparing due to anatomic changes during treatment or unexpected delays in obtaining diagnostic MR appointments.

Conclusions

In four pediatric patients treated with MRgRT, treatment was well tolerated with no severe acute effects. At our center, most pediatric patients are treated with proton therapy, but the cases selected for MRgRT demonstrated significant organ at risk sparing compared to alternative modalities. In particular, MRgRT may provide advantages for thoracic/abdominal/pelvic targets using gated delivery and adaptive replanning, but selected patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy may also benefit MRgRT through superior organ at risk sparing.

Submandibular gland transfer for the prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia in oropharyngeal cancer: Dosimetric impact in the intensity modulated radiotherapy era

BACKGROUND

Submandibular gland (SMG) transfer decreased radiation-associated xerostomia in the 2/3-dimensional radiotherapy era. We evaluated the dosimetric implications of SMG transfer on modern intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans.

METHODS

Eighteen oropharynx cancer patients underwent SMG transfer followed by IMRT; reoptimized plans using the baseline SMG location were generated. Mean salivary gland, oral cavity, and larynx doses were compared between clinical plans and reoptimized plans.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in mean SMG dose (27.53 Gy vs. 29.61 Gy) or total salivary gland dose (26.12 Gy vs. 26.41 Gy) was observed with or without SMG transfer (all p > 0.05). Mean oral cavity and larynx doses were not statistically different. Neither tumor site, target volume crossing midline, stage, nor salivary gland volumes were associated with mean doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary gland doses were similar with or without SMG transfer. IMRT likely decreases the benefit of SMG transfer on the risk of radiation-associated xerostomia.