1
|
Kumar N, Hui SJ, Lee R, Athia S, Rothenfluh DA, Tan JH. Implant and construct decision-making in metastatic spine tumour surgery: a review of current concepts with a decision-making algorithm. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:1899-1910. [PMID: 38289374 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07987-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative Review. OBJECTIVE Metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS) is an important treatment modality of metastatic spinal disease (MSD). Increase in MSTS has been due to improvements in our oncological treatment, as patients have increased longevity and even those with poorer comorbidities are now being considered for surgery. However, there is currently no guideline on how MSTS surgeons should select the appropriate levels to instrument, and which type of implants should be utilised. METHODS The current literature on MSTS was reviewed to study implant and construct decision making factors, with a view to write this narrative review. All studies that were related to instrumentation in MSTS were included. RESULTS A total of 58 studies were included in this review. We discuss novel decision-making models that should be taken into account when planning for surgery in patients undergoing MSTS. These factors include the quality of bone for instrumentation, the extent of the construct required for MSTS patients, the use of cement augmentation and the choice of implant. Various studies have advocated for the use of these modalities and demonstrated better outcomes in MSTS patients when used appropriately. CONCLUSION We have established a new instrumentation algorithm that should be taken into consideration for patients undergoing MSTS. It serves as an important guide for surgeons treating MSTS, with the continuous evolvement of our treatment capacity in MSD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
| | - Si Jian Hui
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Renick Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Sahil Athia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Dominique A Rothenfluh
- Centre for Spinal Surgery, CHUV University Hospital Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jiong Hao Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Centre, National University Health System, Level 11, 1E Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henry M, Templeton A, Smith R. A low-cost phantom design for evaluating spine SABR calculations in the presence of prosthetic vertebral stabilization. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024:10.1007/s13246-024-01412-1. [PMID: 38573488 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01412-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Dose-perturbation characteristics are important to consider during the calculation of radiation therapy protocols for patients who are going to receive high doses that would reach the tolerance limits of the spinal cord [1]. Several studies have investigated dose perturbations introduced by metal implants in close proximity to spine SABR treatments [2-7]. However, there is a lack of work assessing this effect using the RayStation TPS [8]. We present an initial design for a low-cost phantom to evaluate spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the presence of prosthetic vertebral stabilization. The phantom is modular, allowing the prosthetic at the centre of the phantom to be removed by exchanging the central block. It also includes space to insert ion chamber and film. The agreement of the RayStation TPS (v8.0B) collapsed cone convolution (CCC) calculation and measurement was determined for phantom versions with and without prosthetic. There was little to no change in the agreement between the measured and calculated dose when introducing metallic hardware. This suggests that our Raystation-based SABR planning approach for patients with spinal hardware meets clinical expectations. Departments without access to anthropomorphic phantoms may find this design useful but should test their phantom design in typical clinical settings to ensure it is robust to real world situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Henry
- Genesis Care - Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
| | | | - Ruth Smith
- Te Whatu Ora - Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rijs Z, Kawsar KA, Saha P, van de Sande M, Lui D. Evaluation of computed tomography artefacts of carbon-fiber and titanium implants in patients with spinal oligometastatic disease undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6700. [PMID: 38509154 PMCID: PMC10954645 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52498-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated artefacts on computed tomography (CT) images using Hounsfield units (HU) in patients with spinal oligometastatic disease who received carbon-fiber (CF; n = 11) or titanium (n = 11) spine implants and underwent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Pre- and postoperative HU were measured at the vertebral body, pedicle, and spinal cord at three different levels: the lower instrumented vertebra, the level of metastatic spinal cord compression, and an uninvolved level. Areas measured at each level were delicately matched pre- and postoperatively. Significant differences in HU were observed at the vertebral body, the pedicle, and the spinal cord at the lowest instrumented vertebra level for both CF and titanium (average increase 1.54-fold and 5.11-fold respectively). At the metastatic spinal cord compression level, a trend towards a higher HU-increase was observed in titanium compared with CF treated patients (average increase 2.51-fold and 1.43-fold respectively). The relatively high postoperative HU-increase after insertion of titanium implants indicated CT artefacts, while the relatively low HU-increase of CF implants was not associated with artefacts. Less CT artefacts could facilitate an easier contouring phase in radiotherapy planning. In addition, we propose a CT artefact grading system based on postoperative HU-increase. This system could serve as a valuable tool in future research to assess if less CT artefacts lead to time savings during radiotherapy treatment planning and, potentially, to better tumoricidal effects and less adverse effects if particle therapy would be administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeger Rijs
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Priyanshu Saha
- Department of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michiel van de Sande
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Darren Lui
- Department of Orthopedic and Spinal Surgery, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yedekci Y, Elmalı A, Demirkiran G, Ozyigit G, Yazici G. Transit dosimetry of stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments with electronic portal dosimetry device in patient with spinal implant. Phys Eng Sci Med 2022; 45:1103-1109. [PMID: 36074299 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01177-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the use of the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) as an in vivo dosimeter has become widespread. However, reports of EPID for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applications is scarce. There is no data on this topic especially when there are high-density materials in the radiation field. In this study, we aimed to investigate the dose distributions of SBRT treatment plans in patients with spinal implants by transit EPID dosimetry. Implants were inserted in phantoms that mimic the vertebrae, and VMAT plans were created on the phantoms to deliver 16 Gy radiation doses to the target in 1 fraction. Transit EPID measurements were performed for each irradiation. The results were compared with the treatment planning system using the gamma analysis method. According to the gamma analysis results, while the non-implant model met the acceptance criteria with a rate of 95.4%, the implanted models did not pass the test with results between the rates of 70% to 73%. In addition, while the dose difference in the isocenter was 1.3% for the non-implanted model, this difference was observed to be between 7 and 8% in the implanted models. Our study revealed that EPID can be used as transit dosimetry for the VMAT-SBRT applications. However, unacceptable dose differences were obtained by transit EPID dosimetry in the VMAT-SBRT applications of patients with an implant. In the treatment of such patients, alternative treatment methods should be preferred in which the interaction of the implants with radiation can be prevented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Yedekci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Aysenur Elmalı
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Demirkiran
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gözde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porras JL, Pennington Z, Hung B, Hersh A, Schilling A, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Radiotherapy and Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Spine Tumors: A Narrative Review. World Neurosurg 2021; 151:147-154. [PMID: 34023467 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Spine tumors encompass a wide range of diseases with a commensurately broad spectrum of available treatments, ranging from radiation for spinal metastases to highly invasive en bloc resection for primary vertebral column malignancies. This high variability in treatment approaches stems both from variability in the goals of surgery (e.g., oncologic cure vs. symptom palliation) and from the significant advancements in surgical technologies that have been made over the past 2 decades. Among these advancements are improvements in surgical technique, namely minimally invasive approaches, increased availability of focused radiation modalities (e.g., proton therapy and linear accelerator devices), and new surgical technologies, such as carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone rods. In addition, several groups have described nonsurgical interventions, such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for spinal instability secondary to pathologic fracture, and lesion ablation with spinal laser interstitial thermoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or cryoablation. We provide an overview of the latest technological advancements in spinal oncology and their potential usefulness for modern spinal oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L Porras
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bethany Hung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew Hersh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew Schilling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dumas JL, Dal R, Zefkili S, Robilliard M, Losa S, Birba I, Vu-Bezin J, Beddok A, Calugaru V, Dutertre G, De Marzi L. Addressing the dosimetric impact of bone cement and vertebroplasty in stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2021; 85:42-49. [PMID: 33965740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bone cement used for vertebroplasty can affect the accuracy on the dose calculation of the radiation therapy treatment. In addition the CT values of high density objects themselves can be misrepresented in kVCT images. The aim of our study is then to propose a streamlined approach for estimating the real density of cement implants used in stereotactic body radiation therapy. METHODS Several samples of cement were manufactured and irradiated in order to investigate the impact of their composition on the radiation dose. The validity of the CT conversion method for a range of photon energies was investigated, for the studied samples and on six patients. Calculations and measurements were carried out with various overridden densities and dose prediction algorithms (AXB with dose-to-medium reporting or AAA) in order to find the effective density override. RESULTS Relative dose differences of several percent were found between the dose measured and calculated downstream of the implant using an ion chamber and TPS or EPID dosimetry. If the correct density is assigned to the implant, calculations can provide clinically acceptable accuracy (gamma criteria of 3%/2 mm). The use of MV imaging significantly favors the attribution of a correct equivalent density to the implants compared to the use of kVCT images. CONCLUSION The porosity and relative density of the various studied implants vary significantly. Bone cement density estimations can be characterized using MV imaging or planar in vivo dosimetry, which could help determining whether errors in dose calculations are due to incorrect densities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Luc Dumas
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France.
| | - Romaric Dal
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Magalie Robilliard
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Sandra Losa
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Imène Birba
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Jérémi Vu-Bezin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Beddok
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France
| | | | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris, France; Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
An Overview of Decision Making in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors. Indian J Orthop 2021; 55:799-814. [PMID: 34194637 PMCID: PMC8192670 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00368-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal metastases are the most commonly encountered spinal tumors. With increasing life expectancy and better systemic treatment options, the incidence of patients seeking treatment for spinal metastasis is rising. Radical resections and conventional low-dose radiotherapy have given way to modern 'separation' surgeries and stereotactic body radiotherapy which entails lesser morbidity and improved local control. This article provides an overview of the decision making and currently available treatment options for metastatic spinal tumors. METHODS A MEDLINE literature search was made for studies in English language reporting on human subjects, describing results of various treatment options that are a part of multidisciplinary management of metastatic spinal tumors. The highest-quality evidence available in the literature was reviewed. DISCUSSION Treatment of patients with metastatic spinal tumors is largely palliative, with radiotherapy and selective surgery being the mainstays of management. Multidisciplinary management that incorporates factors like patient performance status, expected survival and systemic burden of disease and employs well-validated decision-making frameworks for guiding treatment holds the key to an effective palliative treatment strategy. Effective pain management, achieving local control, adequate neurological decompression in the setting of epidural cord compression and surgical stabilization for mechanical stabilization are the main goals of treatment. CONCLUSION The management of metastatic spinal tumors has been rapidly evolving; currently, limited decompression and stabilization followed by postoperative SBRT for local tumor control are associated with less morbidity and may be referred to as the current standard of care in these patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, McCarthy EF, Ahmed AK, Pittman PD, Lubelski D, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021; 21:500-517. [PMID: 33589095 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Chordoma is a notochord-derived primary tumor of the skull base and vertebral column known to affect 0.08 to 0.5 per 100,000 persons worldwide. Patients commonly present with mechanical, midline pain with or without radicular features secondary to nerve root compression. Management of these lesions has classically revolved around oncologic resection, defined by en bloc resection of the lesion with negative margins as this was found to significantly improve both local control and overall survival. With advancement in radiation modalities, namely the increased availability of focused photon therapy and proton beam radiation, high-dose (>50 Gy) neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy is also becoming a standard of care. At present chemotherapy does not appear to have a role, but ongoing investigations into the ontogeny and molecular pathophysiology of chordoma promise to identify therapeutic targets that may further alter this paradigm. In this narrative review we describe the epidemiology, histopathology, diagnosis, and treatment of chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Edward F McCarthy
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - A Karim Ahmed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Patricia D Pittman
- Department of Neuropathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Meyer 5-185A, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chua CYX, Liu HC, Di Trani N, Susnjar A, Ho J, Scorrano G, Rhudy J, Sizovs A, Lolli G, Hernandez N, Nucci MC, Cicalo R, Ferrari M, Grattoni A. Carbon fiber reinforced polymers for implantable medical devices. Biomaterials 2021; 271:120719. [PMID: 33652266 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Carbon fibers reinforced polymers (CFRPs) are prolifically finding applications in the medical field, moving beyond the aerospace and automotive industries. Owing to its high strength-to-weight ratio, lightness and radiolucency, CFRP-based materials are emerging to replace traditional metal-based medical implants. Numerous types of polymers matrices can be incorporated with carbon fiber using various manufacturing methods, creating composites with distinct properties. Thus, prior to biomedical application, comprehensive evaluation of material properties, biocompatibility and safety are of paramount importance. In this study, we systematically evaluated a series of novel CFRPs, aiming at analyzing biocompatibility for future development into medical implants or implantable drug delivery systems. These CFRPs were produced either via Carbon Fiber-Sheet Molding Compound or Fused Deposition Modelling-based additive manufacturing. Unlike conventional methods, both fabrication processes afford high production rates in a time-and cost-effective manner. Importantly, they offer rapid prototyping and customization in view of personalized medical devices. Here, we investigate the physicochemical and surface properties, material mutagenicity or cytotoxicity of 20 CFRPs, inclusive of 2 surface finishes, as well as acute and sub-chronic toxicity in mice and rabbits, respectively. We demonstrate that despite moderate in vitro physicochemical and surface changes over time, most of the CFRPs were non-mutagenic and non-cytotoxic, as well as biocompatible in small animal models. Future work will entail extensive material assessment in the context of orthopedic applications such as evaluating potential for osseointegration, and a chronic toxicity study in a larger animal model, pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrine Ying Xuan Chua
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hsuan-Chen Liu
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Nicola Di Trani
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS), Shijingshan, 19 Yuquan Road, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Antonia Susnjar
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeremy Ho
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Giovanni Scorrano
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Department of Material Science and Nanoengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Jessica Rhudy
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Antons Sizovs
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Graziano Lolli
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, 10129, Italy
| | - Nathanael Hernandez
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Maria Concetta Nucci
- Division of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Roberto Cicalo
- D-Verge Srl, Sant'Agata Bolognese, Emilia-Romagna, 40019, Italy
| | - Mauro Ferrari
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Alessandro Grattoni
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sturdza A, Viswanathan AN, Erickson B, Yashar C, Bruggeman A, Feddock J, Klopp A, Beriwal S, Gaffney D, Han K, Kamrava M. American Brachytherapy Society working group report on the patterns of care and a literature review of reirradiation for gynecologic cancers. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:127-138. [PMID: 31917178 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrences of previously irradiated gynecological malignancies are uncommon. Standardized management of these cases is not well established. We aim to provide an in-depth literature review and present current practice patterns among an international group of experienced practitioners in the reirradiation setting of gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS An extensive literature search was performed and 35 articles were selected based on preset criteria. A 20-question online survey of 10 experts regarding their retreatment practices was also conducted. RESULTS The reviewed publications include a diverse group of patients, multiple treatment techniques, a range of total doses, local control, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Overall, local control ranged from 44% to 88% over 1-5 years with OS in the range of 39.5-82% at 2-5 years. Late G3-4 toxicity varied very broadly from 0% to 42.9%, with most papers reporting serious toxicities greater than 15%. The most common reirradiation technique utilized was brachytherapy. Some low-dose-rate data suggest improved outcomes with doses >50 Gy. The high-dose-rate data are more varied with some studies suggesting improved local control with doses >40 Gy. In general, a longer time interval between the first and second course of radiation as well as recurrences <2-4 cm tend to have improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation with brachytherapy results in relatively reasonable local control and toxicities for women with recurrent gynecologic cancers. The appropriate dose for each case needs to be individualized given the heterogeneity of cases. Multidisciplinary management is critical to develop individualized plans and to clearly communicate potential side effects and expected treatment outcomes. TAKE HOME MESSAGE Reirradiation with brachytherapy is an acceptable effective organ preserving approach for recurrent gynecologic cancers with a reasonable local control and toxicity profile. Each case requires multidisciplinary management to develop an individualized approach. Monitoring for potential long-term toxicities is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria.
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - Catheryn Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego
| | - Andrew Bruggeman
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego
| | | | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman cancer center
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Delgado-López PD, Roldán-Delgado H, Corrales-García EM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and minimally invasive surgery in the management of spinal metastases: a change in the paradigm. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2019; 31:119-131. [PMID: 31668627 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucir.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The main goal of treatment in spinal metastatic patients is local control of the disease, pain relief and the maintenance of ambulation. Traditionally, wide surgical resection of the tumour followed by adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy has been recommended. Currently, single-fraction or hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) yields a one-year local control rate of over 95% with minimum morbidity, even for tumours previously considered radioresistant. In addition, by posterolateral and circumferential decompression and stabilisation of the spinal cord, it is feasible to create a 2 to 3 mm epidural margin between the dura mater and the tumour (separation surgery), enough to deliver safe and ablative doses of SBRT to the vertebrae. As these patients tend to be frail, such interventions should ideally be minimally invasive, thereby reducing surgical aggressiveness and helping to minimise the delay of any systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Héctor Roldán-Delgado
- Servicio de Neurocirugía, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Akdeniz Y, Yegingil I, Yegingil Z. Effects of metal implants and a metal artifact reduction tool on calculation accuracy of AAA and Acuros XB algorithms in small fields. Med Phys 2019; 46:5326-5335. [PMID: 31508819 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, the dosimetric accuracy of analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation algorithms (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was investigated for small radiation fields incident on phantoms of various metals that include stainless steel grade 316L (SS316L) and titanium alloy grade 5 (Ti5) implants. In addition, the effects of using metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) were evaluated. METHODS The evaluations of AAA and AXB were performed by comparing the crossline profiles calculated by AAA and AXB with GafChromicTM EBT3 film measurements at the phantom-implant interfaces and in close vicinity of implant materials for small field sizes (1 × 1 cm2 , 2 × 2 cm2 , 3 × 3 cm2 , and 4 × 4 cm2 ) of a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam. O-MAR corrected and uncorrected (UC) computed tomography (CT) images were used for dose calculations. The values of average and standard deviations (SD) of Hounsfield unit (HU) for selected regions of each case were evaluated. The differences in average dose percentages in defined regions were calculated to quantify the relative dosimetric changes between doses calculated on UC and O-MAR corrected CT images. RESULTS Compared to UC images, the values of SD were reduced, and the average HU became closer to its reference value in the O-MAR images. There was some discrepancy in average dose percentage differences between calculations using UC and O-MAR images at 1 cm above the SS316L implant (average dose percentage differences were AXB/UC = 5.9% and AXB/O-MAR = -1.2%; AAA/UC = 2.2%, and AAA/O-MAR = -0.8%). Neither AAA nor AXB algorithms predict increase in dose at upper phantom-implant interface (4.9%, 9.9%. 13.5%, and 13.8% for the fields from 1 × 1 cm2 to 4 × 4 cm2 , respectively). At the side of the SS316L implant (where dark streak artifacts exist), dose difference averages were estimated as - 1.1% and 22.3% when AXB/O-MAR and AXB/UC calculations are compared with EBT3 measurements, respectively. Dose predictions at 1 cm below the SS316L implant were underestimated by AXB/O-MAR (average -0.5%) and AXB/UC (average 2.0%). CONCLUSIONS The O-MAR tool was shown to have a favorable dosimetric effect or no effect on the calculations in the upper proximity of the implant materials. The dose differences between EBT3 film measurements and calculations at upper phantom-implant interfaces were smaller when they were calculated using O-MAR images. However, the dose differences increased when O-MAR corrected images were used for AAA calculations at lower phantom-implant interfaces. Use of O-MAR enabled closer agreement for the AXB algorithm, especially in the dark streak artifact regions. The O-MAR algorithm should be used when the dose is calculated with the AXB algorithm in cases of patients with the metal implants. The estimations using AAA and AXB algorithms, in phantom setups, with Ti5 implant material were found to be closer to the EBT3 film measurements, when compared with the same estimations using SS316L implant material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yucel Akdeniz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem Adana Hospital, Seyhan, Adana, 01130, Turkey
| | - Ilhami Yegingil
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Zehra Yegingil
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Cukurova University, Saricam, Adana, 01330, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hoang AT, Jong WL, Ung NM. Addressing the dose perturbation of metallic implant in spinal Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
14
|
Barzilai O, Boriani S, Fisher CG, Sahgal A, Verlaan JJ, Gokaslan ZL, Lazary A, Bettegowda C, Rhines LD, Laufer I. Essential Concepts for the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease: What the Surgeon Should Know and Practice. Global Spine J 2019; 9:98S-107S. [PMID: 31157152 PMCID: PMC6512191 DOI: 10.1177/2192568219830323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Literature review. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the recent advances in spinal oncology, emphasizing the key role of the surgeon in the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic tumors. METHODS Literature review. RESULTS Therapeutic advances led to longer survival times among cancer patients, placing significant emphasis on durable local control, optimization of quality of life, and daily function for patients with spinal metastatic tumors. Recent integration of modern diagnostic tools, precision oncologic treatment, and widespread use of new technologies has transformed the treatment of spinal metastases. Currently, multidisciplinary spinal oncology teams include spinal surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, pain and rehabilitation specialists, and interventional radiologists. Consistent use of common language facilitates communication, definition of treatment indications and outcomes, alongside comparative clinical research. The main parameters used to characterize patients with spinal metastases include functional status and health-related quality of life, the spinal instability neoplastic score, the epidural spinal cord compression scale, tumor histology, and genomic profile. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiotherapy revolutionized spinal oncology through delivery of durable local tumor control regardless of tumor histology. Currently, the major surgical indications include mechanical instability and high-grade spinal cord compression, when applicable, with surgery providing notable improvement in the quality of life and functional status for appropriately selected patients. Surgical trends include less invasive surgery with emphasis on durable local control and spinal stabilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Barzilai
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Charles G. Fisher
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ziya L. Gokaslan
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
- The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Aron Lazary
- National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Ilya Laufer
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laufer I, Bilsky MH. Advances in the treatment of metastatic spine tumors: the future is not what it used to be. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30:299-307. [PMID: 30835704 DOI: 10.3171/2018.11.spine18709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
An improved understanding of tumor biology, the ability to target tumor drivers, and the ability to harness the immune system have dramatically improved the expected survival of patients diagnosed with cancer. However, many patients continue to develop spine metastases that require local treatment with radiotherapy and surgery. Fortunately, the evolution of radiation delivery and operative techniques permits durable tumor control with a decreased risk of treatment-related toxicity and a greater emphasis on restoration of quality of life and daily function. Stereotactic body radiotherapy allows delivery of ablative radiation doses to the majority of spine tumors, reducing the need for surgery. Among patients who still require surgery for decompression of the spinal cord or spinal column stabilization, minimal access approaches and targeted tumor excision and ablation techniques minimize the surgical risk and facilitate postoperative recovery. Growing interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists and clinicians will further elucidate the synergistic possibilities among systemic, radiation, and surgical interventions for patients with spinal tumors and will bring many closer to curative therapies.
Collapse
|
16
|
Versteeg AL, Hes J, van der Velden JM, Eppinga W, Kasperts N, Verkooijen HM, van Vulpen M, Oner FC, Seravalli E, Verlaan JJ. Sparing the surgical area with stereotactic body radiotherapy for combined treatment of spinal metastases: a treatment planning study. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:251-256. [PMID: 30513233 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1539240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Decreasing the radiation dose in the surgical area is important to lower the risk of wound complications when surgery and radiotherapy are combined for the treatment of spinal metastases. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the surgical area for spinal metastases between single fraction external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and single fraction SBRT with active sparing (SBRT-AS) of the posterior surgical area. METHODS Radiotherapy treatment plans for EBRT, SBRT and SBRT-AS of the posterior surgical area were created for 13 patients with spinal metastases. A single fraction of 8Gy was prescribed to the spinal metastasis in the EBRT plan. For the SBRT treatment plans, a single fraction of 18Gy was prescribed to the metastasis and 8Gy to the rest of the vertebral body. For the SBRT plan with active sparing the dose in the designated surgical area was minimized without compromising the dose to the organs at risk. RESULTS The median dose in the surgical area was 2.6Gy (1.6-5.3Gy) in the SBRT plan with active sparing of the surgical area compared to a median dose of 3.7Gy (1.6-6.3Gy) in the SBRT plan without sparing and 6.5Gy (3.5-9.1Gy) in the EBRT plans (p < .001). The radiation doses to the spinal metastases and organs at risk were not significantly different between the SBRT plan with and without sparing the surgical area. CONCLUSIONS The radiation dose to the surgical area is significantly decreased with the use of SBRT compared to EBRT. Active sparing of the surgical area further decreased the mean radiation dose in the surgical area without compromising the dose to the spinal metastasis and the organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. L. Versteeg
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. Hes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. M. van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W. Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N. Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F. C. Oner
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E. Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. J. Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|