1
|
Thwaites DI, Prokopovich DA, Garrett RF, Haworth A, Rosenfeld A, Ahern V. The rationale for a carbon ion radiation therapy facility in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71 Suppl 2:59-76. [PMID: 38061984 PMCID: PMC11011608 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Australia has taken a collaborative nationally networked approach to achieve particle therapy capability. This supports the under-construction proton therapy facility in Adelaide, other potential proton centres and an under-evaluation proposal for a hybrid carbon ion and proton centre in western Sydney. A wide-ranging overview is presented of the rationale for carbon ion radiation therapy, applying observations to the case for an Australian facility and to the clinical and research potential from such a national centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Institute of Medical ResearchSt James's Hospital and University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | | - Richard F. Garrett
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology OrganisationLucas HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of WollongongSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruangchan S, Palmans H, Knäusl B, Georg D, Clausen M. Dose calculation accuracy in particle therapy: Comparing carbon ions with protons. Med Phys 2021; 48:7333-7345. [PMID: 34482555 PMCID: PMC9291072 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This work presents the validation of an analytical pencil beam dose calculation algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for carbon ions by measurements of dose distributions in heterogeneous phantom geometries. Additionally, a comparison study of carbon ions versus protons is performed considering current best solutions in commercial TPS. Methods All treatment plans were optimized and calculated using the RayStation TPS (RaySearch, Sweden). The dose distributions calculated with the TPS were compared with measurements using a 24‐pinpoint ionization chamber array (T31015, PTW, Germany). Tissue‐like inhomogeneities (bone, lung, and soft tissue) were embedded in water, while a target volume of 4 x 4 x 4 cm3 was defined at two different depths behind the heterogeneities. In total, 10 different test cases, with and without range shifter as well as different air gaps, were investigated. Dose distributions inside as well as behind the target volume were evaluated. Results Inside the target volume, the mean dose difference between calculations and measurements, averaged over all test cases, was 1.6% for carbon ions. This compares well to the final agreement of 1.5% obtained in water at the commissioning stage of the TPS for carbon ions and is also within the clinically acceptable interval of 3%. The mean dose difference and maximal dose difference obtained outside the target area were 1.8% and 13.4%, respectively. The agreement of dose distributions for carbon ions in the target volumes was comparable or better to that between Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations and measurements for protons. Percentage dose differences of more than 10% were present outside the target area behind bone–lung structures, where the carbon ion calculations systematically over predicted the dose. MC dose calculations for protons were superior to carbon ion beams outside the target volumes. Conclusion The pencil beam dose calculations for carbon ions in RayStation were found to be in good agreement with dosimetric measurements in heterogeneous geometries for points of interest located within the target. Large local discrepancies behind the target may contribute to incorrect dose predictions for organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirinya Ruangchan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Hugo Palmans
- Division of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.,Medical Radiation Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Monika Clausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Q, Howard ME, Tu X, Zhu Q, Denbeigh JM, Remmes NB, Herman MG, Beltran CJ, Yuan J, Greipp PT, Boughey JC, Wang L, Johnson N, Goetz MP, Sarkaria JN, Lou Z, Mutter RW. Inhibition of ATM Induces Hypersensitivity to Proton Irradiation by Upregulating Toxic End Joining. Cancer Res 2021; 81:3333-3346. [PMID: 33597272 PMCID: PMC8260463 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-2960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Proton Bragg peak irradiation has a higher ionizing density than conventional photon irradiation or the entrance of the proton beam profile. Whether targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) could enhance vulnerability to the distinct pattern of damage induced by proton Bragg peak irradiation is currently unknown. Here, we performed genetic or pharmacologic manipulation of key DDR elements and evaluated DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, and tumor control in cell lines and xenografts treated with the same physical dose across a radiotherapy linear energy transfer spectrum. Radiotherapy consisted of 6 MV photons and the entrance beam or Bragg peak of a 76.8 MeV spot scanning proton beam. More complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by Bragg peak proton irradiation preferentially underwent resection and engaged homologous recombination (HR) machinery. Unexpectedly, the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, AZD0156, but not an inhibitor of ATM and Rad3-related, rendered cells hypersensitive to more densely ionizing proton Bragg peak irradiation. ATM inhibition blocked resection and shunted more DSBs to processing by toxic ligation through nonhomologous end-joining, whereas loss of DNA ligation via XRCC4 or Lig4 knockdown rescued resection and abolished the enhanced Bragg peak cell killing. Proton Bragg peak monotherapy selectively sensitized cell lines and tumor xenografts with inherent HR defects, and the repair defect induced by ATM inhibitor coadministration showed enhanced efficacy in HR-proficient models. In summary, inherent defects in HR or administration of an ATM inhibitor in HR-proficient tumors selectively enhances the relative biological effectiveness of proton Bragg peak irradiation. SIGNIFICANCE: Coadministration of an ATM inhibitor rewires DNA repair machinery to render cancer cells uniquely hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by the proton Bragg peak, which is characterized by higher density ionization.See related commentary by Nickoloff, p. 3156.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Xinyi Tu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Qian Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jian Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Patricia T Greipp
- Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Neil Johnson
- Molecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Zhenkun Lou
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toppi M, Baroni G, Battistoni G, Bisogni MG, Cerello P, Ciocca M, De Maria P, De Simoni M, Donetti M, Dong Y, Embriaco A, Ferrero V, Fiorina E, Fischetti M, Franciosini G, Kraan AC, Luongo C, Malekzadeh E, Magi M, Mancini-Terracciano C, Marafini M, Mattei I, Mazzoni E, Mirabelli R, Mirandola A, Morrocchi M, Muraro S, Patera V, Pennazio F, Schiavi A, Sciubba A, Solfaroli-Camillocci E, Sportelli G, Tampellini S, Traini G, Valle SM, Vischioni B, Vitolo V, Sarti A. Monitoring Carbon Ion Beams Transverse Position Detecting Charged Secondary Fragments: Results From Patient Treatment Performed at CNAO. Front Oncol 2021; 11:601784. [PMID: 34178614 PMCID: PMC8222779 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.601784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy in which deep seated tumours are treated using 12C ions (Carbon Ions RadioTherapy or CIRT) exploits the high conformity in the dose release, the high relative biological effectiveness and low oxygen enhancement ratio of such projectiles. The advantages of CIRT are driving a rapid increase in the number of centres that are trying to implement such technique. To fully profit from the ballistic precision achievable in delivering the dose to the target volume an online range verification system would be needed, but currently missing. The 12C ions beams range could only be monitored by looking at the secondary radiation emitted by the primary beam interaction with the patient tissues and no technical solution capable of the needed precision has been adopted in the clinical centres yet. The detection of charged secondary fragments, mainly protons, emitted by the patient is a promising approach, and is currently being explored in clinical trials at CNAO. Charged particles are easy to detect and can be back-tracked to the emission point with high efficiency in an almost background-free environment. These fragments are the product of projectiles fragmentation, and are hence mainly produced along the beam path inside the patient. This experimental signature can be used to monitor the beam position in the plane orthogonal to its flight direction, providing an online feedback to the beam transverse position monitor chambers used in the clinical centres. This information could be used to cross-check, validate and calibrate, whenever needed, the information provided by the ion chambers already implemented in most clinical centres as beam control detectors. In this paper we study the feasibility of such strategy in the clinical routine, analysing the data collected during the clinical trial performed at the CNAO facility on patients treated using 12C ions and monitored using the Dose Profiler (DP) detector developed within the INSIDE project. On the basis of the data collected monitoring three patients, the technique potential and limitations will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Toppi
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Maria Giuseppina Bisogni
- Dipartimento di Fisica "E. Fermi", Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.,INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Mario Ciocca
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
| | - Patrizia De Maria
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Fisica Medica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Micol De Simoni
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Donetti
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
| | - Yunsheng Dong
- INFN Section of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Elisa Fiorina
- INFN Sezione di Torino, Turin, Italy.,CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Fischetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Carmela Luongo
- INFN Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Marco Magi
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Mancini-Terracciano
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Marafini
- INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Riccardo Mirabelli
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Morrocchi
- Dipartimento di Fisica "E. Fermi", Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.,INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Patera
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Schiavi
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Adalberto Sciubba
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Solfaroli-Camillocci
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Fisica Medica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Sportelli
- Dipartimento di Fisica "E. Fermi", Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.,INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Tampellini
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Traini
- INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Viviana Vitolo
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessio Sarti
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.,INFN Section of Rome 1, Rome, Italy.,CREF - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche E.Fermi, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iannalfi A, D'Ippolito E, Riva G, Molinelli S, Gandini S, Viselner G, Fiore MR, Vischioni B, Vitolo V, Bonora M, Ronchi S, Petrucci R, Barcellini A, Mirandola A, Russo S, Vai A, Mastella E, Magro G, Maestri D, Ciocca M, Preda L, Valvo F, Orecchia R. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy in skull base chordomas: a prospective study based on a dual particle and a patient-customized treatment strategy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1348-1358. [PMID: 32193546 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate results in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile and to better identify factors influencing clinical outcome of skull base chordoma treated with proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). METHODS We prospectively collected and analyzed data of 135 patients treated between November 2011 and December 2018. Total prescription dose in the PT group (70 patients) and CIRT group (65 patients) was 74 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) delivered in 37 fractions and 70.4 Gy(RBE) delivered in 16 fractions, respectively (CIRT in unfavorable patients). LC and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, to identify prognostic factors on clinical outcomes. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 6-87) months, 14 (21%) and 8 (11%) local failures were observed in CIRT and PT group, respectively. Five-year LC rate was 71% in CIRT cohort and 84% in PT cohort. The estimated 5-year OS rate in the CIRT and PT group was 82% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV), optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and dose coverage are independent prognostic factors of local failure risk. High rate toxicity grade ≥3 was reported in 11% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Particle radiotherapy is an effective treatment for skull base chordoma with acceptable late toxicity. GTV, optic pathways, and/or brainstem compression and target coverage were independent prognostic factors for LC. KEY POINTS • Proton and carbon ion therapy are effective and safe in skull base chordoma.• Prognostic factors are GTV, organs at risk compression, and dose coverage.• Dual particle therapy and customized strategy was adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Rachele Petrucci
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Maestri
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Delinder KW, Khan R, Gräfe JL. Neutron activation of gadolinium for ion therapy: a Monte Carlo study of charged particle beams. Sci Rep 2020; 10:13417. [PMID: 32770174 PMCID: PMC7414875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70429-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the photon production from thermal neutron capture in a gadolinium (Gd) infused tumor as a result of secondary neutrons from particle therapy. Gadolinium contrast agents used in MRI are distributed within the tumor volume and can act as neutron capture agents. As a result of particle therapy, secondary neutrons are produced and absorbed by Gd in the tumor providing potential enhanced localized dose in addition to a signature photon spectrum that can be used to produce an image of the Gd enriched tumor. To investigate this imaging application, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed for 10 different particles using a 5-10 cm spread out-Bragg peak (SOBP) centered on an 8 cm3, 3 mg/g Gd infused tumor. For a proton beam, 1.9 × 106 neutron captures per RBE weighted Gray Equivalent dose (GyE) occurred within the Gd tumor region. Antiprotons ([Formula: see text]), negative pions (- π), and helium (He) ion beams resulted in 10, 17 and 1.3 times larger Gd neutron captures per GyE than protons, respectively. Therefore, the characteristic photon based spectroscopic imaging and secondary Gd dose enhancement could be viable and likely beneficial for these three particles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt W Van Delinder
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
| | - Rao Khan
- Medical Physics Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - James L Gräfe
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St., Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, and the available treatment options are limited. This article reviews the recent preclinical and clinical investigations that seek to expand the repertoire of effective medical and radiotherapy options for GBM. RECENT FINDINGS Recent phase III trials evaluating checkpoint inhibition did not result in significant survival benefit. Select vaccine strategies have yielded promising results in early phase clinical studies and warrant further validation. Various targeted therapies are being explored but have yet to see breakthrough results. In addition, novel radiotherapy approaches are in development to maximize safe dose delivery. A multitude of preclinical and clinical studies in GBM explore promising immunotherapies, targeted agents, and novel radiation modalities. Recent phase III trial failures have once more highlighted the profound tumor heterogeneity and diverse resistance mechanisms of glioblastoma. This calls for the development of biomarker-driven and personalized treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa K Liu
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, 240 E. 38th Street, 19th floor, New York, NY, 10019, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvia C Kurz
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, 240 E. 38th Street, 19th floor, New York, NY, 10019, USA. .,Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goossens ME, Van den Bulcke M, Gevaert T, Meheus L, Verellen D, Cosset JM, Storme G. Is there any benefit to particles over photon radiotherapy? Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:982. [PMID: 32010206 PMCID: PMC6974365 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle, essentially, proton radiotherapy (RT) could provide some benefits over photon RT, especially in reducing the side effects of RT. We performed a systematic review to identify the performed randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and ongoing RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. So far, there are no results available from phase 3 RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. Furthermore, the results on side effects comparing proton and carbon ion beam RT with photon RT do vary. The introduction of new techniques in photon RT, such as image-guided RT (IGRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body RT (SBRT) was already effective in reducing side effects. At present, the lack of evidence limits the indications for proton and carbon ion beam RTs and makes the particle RT still experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria E Goossens
- Cancer Centre, Sciensano (Scientific Institute of Public Health), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Van den Bulcke
- Cancer Centre, Sciensano (Scientific Institute of Public Health), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| | - Lydie Meheus
- The Anticancer Fund, Reliable Cancer Therapies, Strombeek-Bever, 1853, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
- Iridium Kankernetwerk Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| | - Jean-Marc Cosset
- Centre de Radiothérapie Charlebourg, Groupe Amethyst, 65, Avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France
| | - Guy Storme
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|