1
|
Luo X, Huang X, Luo J, Xiao J, Wang K, Qu Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wu R, Wang J, Zhang J, Xu G, Gao L, Liu S, Wang X, He X, Luo D, Yi J. Induction TPF followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer: a preliminary analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1235. [PMID: 36447152 PMCID: PMC9706919 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10306-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment choice for locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT is superior to CCRT alone to treat locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients (n = 142) were randomized to receive two cycles of paclitaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) IC followed by CCRT or CCRT alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included the larynx-preservation rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and toxicities. RESULTS Ultimately, 113 of the 142 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 45.6 months (interquartile range 26.8-57.8 months), the 3-year OS was 53.1% in the IC + CCRT group compared with 54.8% in the CCRT group (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 0.573-1.761; P = 0.988). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS, DMFS, and the larynx-preservation rate between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was much higher in the IC+ CCRT group than in the CCRT group (54.7% vs. 10%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adding induction TPF to CCRT did not improve survival and the larynx-preservation rate in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer, but caused a higher incidence of acute hematological toxicities. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03558035. Date of first registration, 15/06/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Luo
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Kai Wang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Yuan Qu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Ye Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Runye Wu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Guozhen Xu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Li Gao
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Shaoyan Liu
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Xiaolei Wang
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Xiaohui He
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Dehong Luo
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China
| | - Junlin Yi
- grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 China ,grid.506261.60000 0001 0706 7839National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Langfang, 065001 China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haussmann J, Budach W, Nestle-Krämling C, Wollandt S, Tamaskovics B, Corradini S, Bölke E, Krug D, Fehm T, Ruckhäberle E, Audretsch W, Jazmati D, Matuschek C. Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14164031. [PMID: 36011025 PMCID: PMC9406575 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This retrospective analysis reports on the treatment outcomes of women diagnosed with high-risk breast cancer treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy before the surgical removal of the tumor. It is well established that the lack of visible tumor cells in the pathological tumors analysis by the time of surgery (known as pathological complete response, pCR) is a factor that improves survival without the tumor reappearing in the body. However, it is unknown whether that is only true when giving systemic therapy or when pCR is achieved with the help of radiotherapy. We collected patient information and survival times to analyze the outcome in our patient group. We found that women with a pCR treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy can expect favorable long-term survival. This was true across different types of breast cancer and chemotherapy substances. Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed. Results: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41–0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Carolin Nestle-Krämling
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Dusseldorf, 40217 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Sylvia Wollandt
- Department of Senology, Sana-Kliniken Duesseldorf-Gerresheim, 40625 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Balint Tamaskovics
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), 80366 Munich, Germany
| | - Edwin Bölke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-0211-81-17990
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhäberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Werner Audretsch
- Department of Senology and Breast Surgery, Breast Center at Marien Hospital Cancer Center, 40479 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Danny Jazmati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nguyen ML, Hsieh ML, Henson C, Krempl G. Neoadjuvant QUAD shot for downstaging or temporizing locally advanced oral cavity cancer prior to definitive surgery. Oral Oncol 2022; 133:106029. [PMID: 35870330 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The mainstay of oral cavity cancer treatment is surgery, often with adjuvant therapies. However, patients often present with locally advanced disease and downstaging would render surgery more feasible. We evaluated hypofractionated radiation therapy (QUAD Shot) prior to definitive surgery for head and neck cancers, with a goal of downstaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with primary head and neck malignancy, predominantly locally advanced oral cavity cancers, received QUAD Shot radiation therapy from June 2016 to July 2021. External beam radiation therapy was delivered to the primary lesion in four fractions over two days, two fractions/day at least six hours apart with total dose ranging from 1400 cGy to 1500 cGy. Twelve patients proceeded to definitive surgery. RESULTS Of the twelve patients receiving surgery, one had complete response to radiation therapy with no pathological disease seen at surgery. Four patients had a partial response, defined as downstaging on final pathology. Five patients showed no response, and two had progressive disease defined as upstaging on final pathology. Seven patients had radiographic primary tumor shrinkage ≥ 0.5 cm following Quad Shot. The Quad Shot was tolerated well with no reported adverse effects. CONCLUSION Discrepancies between clinical- and pathological-staging are common and expected. However, ∼40 % of our patients experienced downstaging following QUAD Shot. Thus, neoadjuvant radiation therapy may be viable for temporizing tumor growth while awaiting surgery, or for downstaging and thus facilitating more technically feasible and less morbid surgery for locally advanced head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- My-Lien Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Meng-Lun Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Christina Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Greg Krempl
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo X, Huang X, Liu S, Wang X, Luo J, Xiao J, Wang K, Qu Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhang J, Xu G, Gao L, Wu R, Yi J. Response-Adapted Treatment Following Radiotherapy in Patients With Resectable Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e220165. [PMID: 35191967 PMCID: PMC8864511 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Laryngeal preservation strategies for resectable locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma (LAHPC) have been explored. However, the optimal strategy remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate a response-adapted strategy based on an early response to radiotherapy (RT) in patients with resectable LAHPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted from May 2009 to October 2019 with a median (IQR) follow-up period of 66.5 (44.7-97.0) months. The study was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center and included 423 patients pathologically confirmed stage III and IVB LAHPC. A total of 250 patients with previous cancer history, synchronous primary cancer, stage I or II, or with unresectable hypopharyngeal carcinoma were excluded. EXPOSURES Patients who reached 80% or greater tumor regression when evaluated endoscopically and by imaging methods at 50 Gy received definitive RT or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and those with less than 80% regression underwent surgery 4 to 6 weeks after RT. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Five-year overall survival and survival with a functional larynx. RESULTS Overall, 423 patients were included in the study (median [IQR] age, 55 [50-63] years; 408 [96.5%] men and 15 [3.5%] women). The response-adapted and primary surgery groups had significantly better survival than the primary RT group (52.7% and 54.4% vs 27.7%, respectively; P < .001). The response-adapted and primary surgery groups had similar 5-year overall survival of 52.7% vs 54.4%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.39; P = .89). The response-adapted group had better 5-year survival with functional larynx than the primary surgery group (40.6% vs 33.9%; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84, P = .001). Surgery complications did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Among patients in the response-adapted group who required total laryngectomy (n = 186) as indicated by pretreatment evaluation, the 5-year cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival with functional larynx was 39.8%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, the response-adapted strategy based on an early RT response facilitated better treatment tailoring, maximum tumor control, and higher laryngeal preservation compared with primary surgery and primary RT strategies. This approach could provide a feasible laryngeal preservation strategy in patients with LAHPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shaoyan Liu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolei Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guozhen Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Masarwy R, Kampel L, Horowitz G, Gutfeld O, Muhanna N. Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Resectable Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:871-878. [PMID: 34473219 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.2191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The emerging approach of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for solid cancers has set the ground for the integration of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into the neoadjuvant setting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment. Objective To assess the reported efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC. Data Sources and Study Selection Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for published and ongoing cohort studies and randomized clinical trials that evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC. The search results generated studies from 2015 to July 2021. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two investigators (R.M. and L.K.) independently identified and extracted articles for potential inclusion. Random and fixed models were used to achieve pooled odds ratios. All results are presented with 95% CIs. Data quality was assessed by means of the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were reported efficacy, evaluated by major pathological response and pathological complete response in the primary tumors and lymph nodes separately, and safety, assessed by preoperative grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events and surgical delay rate. Results A total of 344 patients from 10 studies were included. In 8 studies, neoadjuvant immunotherapy only was administered, and the other 2 studies combined immunotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The overall major pathological response rate in the primary tumor sites from studies reporting on neoadjuvant immunotherapy only was 9.7% (95% CI, 3.1%-18.9%) and the pathological complete response rate was 2.9% (95% CI, 0%-9.5%). Preoperative grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported at a rate of 8.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-23.2%) and surgical delay at a rate of 0% (95% CI, 0%-0.9%). There was a favorable association of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with all outcome measures. The subgroup analyses did not find one specific anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent to be superior to another, and the favorable association was demonstrated by either immunotherapy alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for resectable HNSCC was well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages implied by histopathological response. Long-term outcomes are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Razan Masarwy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Liyona Kampel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gilad Horowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Orit Gutfeld
- Institute of Radiation Therapy, Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nidal Muhanna
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|