Whole brain radiation therapy plus focal boost may be a suitable strategy for brain metastases in SCLC patients: a multi-center study

Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost in lung cancer brain metastases and utility of the Hopkins verbal learning test for testing cognitive impairment in Chinese patients: a prospective phase II study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT-SIB) treating brain metastases (BM) and utility of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) (Chinese version) in Chinese lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Lung cancer patients with BM undergone HA-WBRT-SIB at our center were enrolled. Brain magnetic resonance imaging, The HVLT total learning score, and side effects were evaluated before radiotherapy and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy. This study analyzed the overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, and changes in HVLT-R immediate recall scores.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled between Jan 2016 and Jan 2020. The median follow-up time was 14.2 months. The median survival, progression-free survival, and intracranial progression-free survival of all patients were 14.8 months, 6.7 months and 14.8 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that male sex and newly diagnosed stage IV disease were associated with poor overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. HVLT-R scores at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy were 21.94 ± 2.99, 20.88 ± 3.12, 20.03 ± 3.14, and 19.78 ± 2.98, respectively. The HVLT-R scores at 6 months after radiotherapy decreased by approximately 9.8% compared with those at baseline. No grade 3 toxicities occurred in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

HA-WBRT-SIB is of efficiency and cognitive-conserving in treating Chinese lung cancer BM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in 24th Feb, 2024. The ClinicalTrials.gov ID is NCT06289023.

Serplulimab monotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a case report

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with limited treatment options, especially for extensive-stage (ES) patients. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with ES-SCLC and asymptomatic brain metastasis who opted for immune monotherapy with serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). After four cycles, the patient achieved a confirmed partial response and a progression-free survival of over 1 year. Moreover, we observed a consistent decline in tumor biomarkers, and brain MRI indicated reduced metastatic activity. Remarkably, the patient tolerated the treatment well, with only mild diarrhea. This case highlights serplulimab's potential as a first-line treatment in select ES-SCLC patients, emphasizing the importance of further research on immunotherapy predictive biomarkers.

Efficacy of First-Line Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Different Brain Metastases Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with differing brain metastasis statuses.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search in public databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, to identify randomized controlled trials involving ES-SCLC patients, with or without brain metastases, who underwent first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measure was overall survival (OS).

Results

Our analysis incorporated seven high-quality randomized controlled trials, encompassing 398 patients with brain metastases and 3,533 without. Among patients without brain metastases, the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy led to significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 - 0.84, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67 - 0.88, P < 0.001) in comparison to chemotherapy alone. Conversely, for patients with brain metastases, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy did not result in a significant improvement in PFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.66 - 1.61, P = 0.887) or OS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.31, P = 0.776) when compared to chemotherapy alone.

Conclusions

In ES-SCLC patients without brain metastases, first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy demonstrated improved PFS and OS in contrast to chemotherapy alone. However, patients with brain metastases did not experience similar benefits.

Propensity score-matched analysis comparing hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous integrated boost with hippocampus‑avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy alone for multiple brain metastases-a retrospective study in multiple institutions

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for multiple brain metastases has been recently controversially discussed.This study was aimed to explore the feasibility of Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy plus a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB) in patients with multiple brain metastases and assess tumor control in comparison with Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) alone for brain metastases.

METHODS

In this study, 63 patients with multiple brain metastases (≥ 4 metastases) had undergone HA-WBRT + SIB between January 2016 and December 2020 in the observation group:HA-WBRT (30 Gy in 12 fractions, the maximum dose of the hippocampus ≤ 14 Gy) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (48 Gy in 12 fractions) for brain metastases.Overall Survival (OS), Median survival,intracranial control (IC = control within the entire brain), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and adverse events were compared with the control group (a HA-WBRT retrospective cohort) by propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score matching,there were 56 patients in each group (the observation group, the control group). OS, median survival and iPFS were significantly longer in the observation group (18.4 vs. 10.9 months, P<0.001), (13.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001), (13.9 vs.7.8 months, P<0.001). In comparison of 1-year-IC rates, the observation group also demonstrated higher than the control group (51.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002), respectively. Seven hippocampal metastases were found in the control group (4/56,7.1%) and the observation group (3/56,5.4%) after HA-WBRT. The death rate of intracranial progression were 23.2% in the observation group and 37.5% in the control group.All adverse events were not significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HA-WBRT + SIB resulted in better OS,median survival, IC, iPFS, an acceptable risk of radiation response, and a potential way of declining neurocognitive adverse events, which may be a better treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Twenty-Month Regression Following Concurrent Conventional Whole-Brain Irradiation and Chemoimmunotherapy for ≥3.8 cm Cerebellar Metastasis From Small Cell Lung Cancer

Standard whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for large brain metastases (BMs) from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has limited efficacy and durability, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for symptomatic posterior fossa BMs >3 cm with satellite lesions is challenging. Herein, we describe the case of a 73-year-old female presenting with treatment-naïve SCLC and 15 symptomatic multiple BMs, including a ≥3.8-cm cerebellar mass (≥17.7 cm3) and two adjacent lesions; otherwise, the SCLC was confined to the thorax. The patient was initially treated concurrently with conventional WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) without boost and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Atezolizumab was excluded during irradiation. Five months after WBRT, the large cerebellar lesion had remarkably regressed, and the smaller lesions (≤17 mm) showed complete responses (CRs) without local progression at 20 months. However, six and 16 months after WBRT, the thoracic lesions had progressed, and although amrubicin was administered, four new BMs, including pons involvement, had developed, respectively. Despite the CRs of the four BMs following SRS (49.6 Gy in eight fractions) and the sustained regression of the thoracic lesions, meningeal dissemination and multiple new BMs were evident 3.5 months post-SRS. The small remnant of the large BM and/or newly developed BMs abutting the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space could have led to CSF dissemination, the presumed cause of the patient's death. Taken together, concurrent chemo-WBRT and subsequent CIT can provide excellent and durable tumor responses for SCLC BMs, but may not be fully sufficient for BMs ≥3.8 cm. Therefore, in cases with large lesions, focal dose escalation of the large lesions, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and dose de-escalation in the macroscopically unaffected brain region may prevent or attenuate CSF dissemination, new BM development, and adverse effects and thus should be considered.

Parotid metastases from primary lung cancer: Case series and systematic review of the features

Most parotid metastases have been reported to come from the head and neck; however, cases metastasized from the lung are extremely rare. Missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses occurred quite a few times. Thus, accurately identifying the clinical features of parotid metastasis of lung cancer is important. However, current studies about this issue are mostly case reports, and little is known about the detailed and systematic aspects. We reported three cases of parotid metastases from lung cancer and then systematically searched similar cases through “Pub-Med” and “Web of Science”. Finally, twenty-three patients were included in the study. Eighty-three percent of which were males, and 19 patients were over 50 years old. In all cases with smoking history mentioned, 93% were smokers. The predominant pathological type was small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 13 patients, 56%). Seventeen combined with other site metastasis, while more than half of which were brain metastases. The survival time ranged from 3months-17years, and as for SCLCs, it was only 3months-40months. It can be concluded that clinical features, such as sex, age, smoking history, pathological types, and metastasis patterns, could provide valuable evidence for diagnosis. The lung seems to be the most common primary site of parotid metastases except for head and neck tumors. The two circumstances, SCLC coexisting with Warthin’s tumor and parotid small cell carcinoma with lung metastasis, should be differentiated from parotid metastasis of lung cancer with caution For cases presented as SCLC, more aggressive strategies, such as chemotherapy with immunotherapy and maintenance therapy, may be more suitable. Due to the greater tendency of brain metastasis in such diseases, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or prophylactic cranial irradiation should be applied to corresponding patients in time. Additionally, lung cancer parotid metastases may be a marker of poor prognosis.

A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus.

RESULTS

Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%-82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15-45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0-15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4-16.5 months; 3 years, 5%-14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1-18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%-18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6-8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0-14.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC.

Treatment and Prevention of Brain Metastases in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis will develop in 50% of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients throughout disease course. Development of CNS metastasis poses a particular treatment dilemma due to the accompanied cognitive changes, poor permeability of the blood-brain barrier to systemic therapy and relatively advanced state of disease. Survival of patients with untreated SCLC brain metastases is generally <3 months with whole brain radiotherapy used as first-line management in most SCLC patients. To prevent development of CNS metastasis prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended in limited stage disease, after response to chemotherapy and radiation, while PCI may be considered in extensive stage disease after favorable response to upfront treatment. Neurocognitive toxicity with whole brain radiotherapy and PCI is a concern and remains difficult to predict. The mechanism of toxicity is likely multifactorial, but a potential mechanism of injury to the hippocampus has led to hippocampal sparing radiation techniques. Treatment of established non-small cell lung cancer CNS metastases has increasingly focused on using stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) and it is tempting to extrapolate these results to SCLC. In this review, we explore the evidence surrounding the prediction, prevention, detection, and treatment of CNS metastases in SCLC. We further review whether existing evidence supports extrapolating less toxic treatments to SCLC patients with CNS metastases and discuss trials that may shed more light on this question.

Optimizing Whole Brain Radiotherapy Treatment and Dose for Patients With Brain Metastases From Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) compared to whole brain radiotherapy plus local radiation boost (WBRT + boost), and further identify whether higher biologically effective dose (BED) of WBRT + boost translates into a survival benefit in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).

Methods

SCLC patients with BM from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of prognostic factors for OS were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The cutoff value of BED was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Among the 180 eligible patients, 82 received WBRT + boost and 98 received WBRT. Both OS and iPFS in the WBRT + boost group were significantly superior to those in the WBRT group (median OS: 20 vs. 14 months, p = 0.011; median iPFS: 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.003). At a cutoff value of 58.35 Gy in the WBRT + boost group, 52 for the high-BED (>58.35 Gy) group, 30 for the low-BED (≤58.35 Gy) group. High BED was significantly associated with improved OS and iPFS compared with low BED in the WBRT + boost group (median OS: 23 vs. 17 months, p = 0.002; median iPFS: 17 vs. 10 months, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Compared with WBRT alone, WBRT + boost improved OS and iPFS in SCLC patients with BM. High BED (>58.35 Gy) for WBRT + boost may be a reasonable consideration for SCLC patients with BM.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer without prior whole-brain radiotherapy: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Assess upfront Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) effectiveness for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases (BM). Where possible, a comparison with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was performed.

METHODS

Following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and proceedings of annual meetings between inception and July 01, 2020.

RESULTS

Nine observational studies with 1638 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.1-9.5 months, I2 = 0%). OS rate at 12 months was 39% (95% CI 31-44%, I2 = 0%). The relative risk between SRS and WBRT for the OS at 12 months was 1.33 (95% CI 1.13-1.51, P = 0.0001). The projected OS for 6, 12, 18- and 24-months comparing SRS with WBRT was 67% vs. 57%, 39% vs. 29%, 22% vs. 15% and 15% vs 9%, favoring SRS (P < 0.001). The LC rate at 12 months was 93% (95% CI 91-94%, I2 = 0%). The distant brain failure rate (DBFR) at 12 months was 41% (95% CI 33-48%, I2 = 52%, P = 0.08). The SRS or WBRT as salvage treatment after upfront SRS was 32% and 19%, respectively. The freedom from neurologic death at 12 months was 87% (95% CI 84-89%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the pooling of a large sample of retrospective studies our meta-analysis suggests that for high selected SCLC patients with limited BM upfront SRS produces favorable lesion control and survival outcomes. These findings support the design of randomized clinical trial to confirm the role of SRS in this clinical scenario.