1
|
Kang Z. Using dose volume histogram (DVH) predictions to improve the plan quality of helical tomotherapy (HT). Med Dosim 2024:S0958-3947(24)00026-8. [PMID: 38890058 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether the RapidPlan (RP) model configured by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) could be used to assist in the optimization of HT plans and improve their quality. An RP model was trained using 100 clinically accepted VMAT plans of NPC patients. The predicted dose constraints of the VMAT trained RP model were used to reoptimize 25 consecutive clinically accepted HT plans (HT_clinical) and perform new VMAT plans based on the same computed topography (CT). The dosimetric quality of the reoptimized HT plans (HT_reoptimized), HT_clinical, and VMAT group were compared. The minimum dose encompassing 2% target (D2%), the minimum dose encompassing 98% target (D98%), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) were similar for most targets between the HT_clinical and HT_reoptimized plans, although certain targets in the HT_reoptimized plans had higher D2% and HI and lower D98%. The HT_reoptimized plans outperformed the HT_clinical plans in the Dmax and D1cc of the spinal cord, V40Gy of the left temporal lobe, Dmean and V30Gy of the oral cavity, Dmean of the larynx and thyroid, and the differences were statistically significant. HT plans had higher CI and HI than VMAT plans. HT plans outperformed VMAT plans in the Dmax of the spinal cord and lenses, V30Gy of the oral cavity and parotids, and V40Gy of the temporal lobes, but underperformed in the Dmax and D1cc of the brainstem, D1cc of the spinal cord and Dmean of the oral cavity. The VMAT-based RP model can be used to assist in the planning of HT plans and improve the dosimetry quality of HT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, No.55, Zhen Hai Road, Siming District, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China; Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, No.55, Zhen Hai Road, Siming District, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China; Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guberina M, Guberina N, Hoffmann C, Gogishvili A, Freisleben F, Herz A, Hlouschek J, Gauler T, Lang S, Stähr K, Höing B, Pöttgen C, Indenkämpen F, Santiago A, Khouya A, Mattheis S, Stuschke M. Prospects for online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:4. [PMID: 38191400 PMCID: PMC10775598 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02390-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry. METHODS The study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUDCTV) and organs-at-risk (EUDOAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation. RESULTS Altogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUDCTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUDCTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6-99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8-88.7%). While the EUDCTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUDOAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - C Hoffmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - A Gogishvili
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - F Freisleben
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - A Herz
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - J Hlouschek
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - T Gauler
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - S Lang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - K Stähr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - B Höing
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - C Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - F Indenkämpen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - A Santiago
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - A Khouya
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - S Mattheis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williamson A, Houston P, Paterson J, Chalmers AJ, McLoone P, Fullerton N, Foo SY, James A, Nowicki S. Dosimetric comparison of hippocampal-sparing technologies in patients with low-grade glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae131. [PMID: 39220244 PMCID: PMC11364934 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) plays an integral role in the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG). Late toxicity from RT can cause progressive neurocognitive dysfunction. Radiation-induced damage to the hippocampus (HCP) plays a considerable role in memory decline. Advancements in photon planning software have resulted in the development of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) and HyperArc technologies which may improve HCP sparing while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) target coverage. Methods Three planning methods for hippocampal sparing (HS) were compared, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without HS (VMAT_noHS), VMAT with HS (VMAT_HS), MCO with HS (MCO_HS), and HyperArc with HS (HyperArc_HS). Results Twenty-five patients were identified. The contralateral HCP was spared in 16 patients and bilateral HCP in 9 patients with superiorly located tumors. All 3 HS planning techniques showed significant reductions in dose to the spared HCP in contralateral cases but only VMAT_HS and MCO_HS achieved this in bilateral cases (P < .008). Only MCO_HS was superior to VMAT_HS in lowering the dose to both contralateral HCP and bilateral HCP in all measured metrics (P < .008). PTV and OAR (organ at risk) dose constraints were achieved for all plans. Conclusions This retrospective dosimetric study demonstrated the feasibility of HS for low-grade glioma. All 3 HS planning techniques achieved significant dose reductions to the spared contralateral hippocampus, but only MCO_HS and VMAT_HS achieved this in bilateral cases. MCO was superior to other planning techniques for sparing both bilateral and contralateral hippocampi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Williamson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Houston
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Paterson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Philip McLoone
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Natasha Fullerton
- Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurosciences, QEUH, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sin Yee Foo
- Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurosciences, QEUH, Glasgow, UK
| | - Allan James
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Stefan Nowicki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fanou AM, Patatoukas G, Chalkia M, Kollaros N, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Kouloulias V, Platoni K. Implementation, Dosimetric Assessment, and Treatment Validation of Knowledge-Based Planning (KBP) Models in VMAT Head and Neck Radiation Oncology. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11030762. [PMID: 36979740 PMCID: PMC10045933 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge-based treatment planning (KBP) models in terms of their dosimetry and deliverability and to investigate their clinical benefits. Three H&N KBP models were built utilizing RapidPlan™, based on the dose prescription, which is given according to the planning target volume (PTV). The training set for each model consisted of 43 clinically acceptable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. Model quality was assessed and compared to the delivered treatment plans using the homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), structure dose difference (PTV, organ at risk—OAR), monitor units, MU factor, and complexity index. Model deliverability was assessed through a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) gamma index-based analysis. The dosimetric assessment showed better OAR sparing for the RapidPlan™ plans and for the low- and high-risk PTV, and the HI, and CI were comparable between the clinical and RapidPlan™ plans, while for the intermediate-risk PTV, CI was better for clinical plans. The 2D gamma passing rates for RapidPlan™ plans were similar or better than the clinical ones using the 3%/3 mm gamma-index criterion. Monitor units, the MU factors, and complexity indices were found to be comparable between RapidPlan™ and the clinical plans. Knowledge-based treatment plans can be safely adapted into clinical routines, providing improved plan quality in a time efficient way while minimizing user variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Fanou
- Medical Physics Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: (A.-M.F.); (K.P.)
| | - Georgios Patatoukas
- Medical Physics Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Marina Chalkia
- Medical Physics Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kollaros
- Medical Physics Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Andromachi Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Platoni
- Medical Physics Unit, Second Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, 12462 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: (A.-M.F.); (K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma SJ, Yu H, Yu B, Waldman O, Khan M, Chatterjee U, Santhosh S, Gill J, Iovoli AJ, Farrugia M, Shevorykin A, Carl E, Wooten K, Gupta V, McSpadden R, Kuriakose MA, Markiewicz MR, Al-Afif A, Hicks WL, Platek ME, Seshadri M, Sheffer C, Warren GW, Singh AK. Association of Pack-Years of Cigarette Smoking With Survival and Tumor Progression Among Patients Treated With Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2245818. [PMID: 36480200 PMCID: PMC9856262 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE After 10 pack-years of smoking was initially established as a threshold for risk stratification, subsequent clinical trials incorporated it to identify candidates for treatment deintensification. However, several recent studies were unable to validate this threshold externally, and the threshold for smoking exposure remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To estimate the threshold of pack-years of smoking associated with survival and tumor recurrence among patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-institution, cohort study included patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiation from January 2005 to April 2021. Data were analyzed from January to April 2022. EXPOSURES Heavy vs light smoking using 22 pack-years as a threshold based on maximizing log-rank test statistic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure (LRF), and distant failure (DF). RESULTS A total of 518 patients (427 male [82.4%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [55-66] years) were included. Median (IQR) follow-up was 44.1 (22.3-72.8) months. A nonlinear Cox regression model using restricted cubic splines showed continuous worsening of OS and PFS outcomes as pack-years of smoking increased. The threshold of pack-years to estimate OS and PFS was 22. Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) showed that more than 22 pack-years was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.22; P = .01) and PFS (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.89; P = .048). On Fine-Gray MVA, heavy smokers were associated with DF (aHR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02-2.88; P = .04), but not LRF (aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.61-1.87; P = .82). When 10 pack-years of smoking were used as a threshold, there was no association for OS (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83-1.81; P = .30), PFS (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.78-1.57; P = .56), LRF (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.64-2.21; P = .58), and DF (aHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.82-2.56; P = .20). Current smoking was associated with worse OS and PFS only among human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumors (OS: aHR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.26-6.29; P = .01; PFS: aHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.22-5.14; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients treated with definitive chemoradiation, 22 pack-years of smoking was associated with survival and distant metastasis outcomes. Current smoking status was associated with adverse outcomes only among patients with HPV-associated head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Han Yu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Brian Yu
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Olivia Waldman
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Michael Khan
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Udit Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sharon Santhosh
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Jasmin Gill
- University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Austin J. Iovoli
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mark Farrugia
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Alina Shevorykin
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Ellen Carl
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Kimberly Wooten
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Ryan McSpadden
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Moni A. Kuriakose
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael R. Markiewicz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo
| | - Ayham Al-Afif
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Wesley L. Hicks
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mary E. Platek
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, D’Youville University, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mukund Seshadri
- Department of Oral Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Christine Sheffer
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Graham W. Warren
- Hollings Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|