Association of pre-treatment lymphocyte-monocyte ratio with survival outcome in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Given the role of systematic inflammation in cancer progression, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) from peripheral blood has been suggested as a biomarker to assess the extent of inflammation in several solid malignancies. However, the role of LMR as a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer was unclear in several meta-analyses, and there is a paucity of literature including patients in North America. We performed an observational cohort study to evaluate the association of LMR with survival outcomes in North American patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective database was queried for patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation from June 2007 to April 2021 at the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The association of LMR with OS and CSS was examined using nonlinear Cox proportional hazard model using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze OS and CSS. Pre-radiation LMR was then stratified into high and low based on its median value. Propensity scored matching was used to reduce the selection bias.

RESULTS

A total of 476 patients met our criteria. Median follow up was 45.3 months (interquartile range 22.8-74.0). The nonlinear Cox regression model showed that low LMR was associated with worse OS and CSS in a continuous fashion without plateau for both OS and CSS. On Cox MVA, higher LMR as a continuous variable was associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0,90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.99, p = 0.03) and CSS (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95, p = 0.009). The median value of LMR was 3.8. After propensity score matching, a total of 186 pairs were matched. Lower LMR than 3.8 remained to be associated with worse OS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.26, p = 0.009) and CSS (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08-2.63, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Low LMR, both as a continuous variable and dichotomized variable, was associated with worse OS and CSS. Further studies would be warranted to evaluate the role of such prognostic marker to tailor interventions.

Association of Body Mass Index With Outcomes Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy

Importance

Combined modality therapy, such as chemoradiotherapy, often results in significant morbidity among patients with head and neck cancer. Although the role of body mass index (BMI) varies based on cancer subtypes, its association with treatment response, tumor recurrence, and survival outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer remains unclear.

Objective

To evaluate the role of BMI in treatment response, tumor recurrence, and survival outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, observational, single-institution cohort study conducted at a comprehensive cancer center included 445 patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy from January 1, 2005, to January 31, 2021.

Exposure

Normal vs overweight or obese BMI.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Metabolic response after chemoradiotherapy, locoregional failure (LRF), distant failure (DF), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), with Bonferroni correction used to adjust for multiple comparisons and P < .025 being considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 445 patients (373 men [83.8%]; median age, 61 years [IQR, 55-66 years]; 107 [24.0%] with normal BMI, 179 [40.2%] with overweight BMI, and 159 [35.7%] with obese BMI) were included for analysis. Median follow-up was 48.1 months (IQR, 24.7-74.9 months). On Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis, only overweight BMI was associated with improved OS (5-year OS, 71.5% vs 58.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.91]; P = .02) and PFS (5-year PFS, 68.3% vs 50.8%; AHR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.34-0.75]; P < .001). On logistic multivariable analysis, overweight BMI (91.6% vs 73.8%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.93]; P < .001) and obese BMI (90.6% vs 73.8%; AOR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.96]; P = .005) were associated with complete metabolic response on follow-up positron emission tomography-computed tomography after treatments. On Fine-Gray multivariable analysis, overweight BMI was associated with reduction in LRF (5-year LRF, 7.0% vs 25.9%; AHR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.71]; P = .01), but not DF (5-year DF, 17.4% vs 21.5%; AHR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.47-1.77]; P = .79). Obese BMI was not associated with LRF (5-year LRF, 10.4% vs 25.9%; AHR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.29-1.37]; P = .24) or DF (5-year DF, 15.0% vs 21.5%; AHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.35-1.38]; P = .30).

Conclusion

In this cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer, when compared with normal BMI, overweight BMI was an independent factor favorably associated with complete response after treatments, OS, PFS, and LRF. Further investigations are warranted to improve understanding on the role of BMI among patients with head and neck cancer.

Association of Pack-Years of Cigarette Smoking With Survival and Tumor Progression Among Patients Treated With Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer

IMPORTANCE

After 10 pack-years of smoking was initially established as a threshold for risk stratification, subsequent clinical trials incorporated it to identify candidates for treatment deintensification. However, several recent studies were unable to validate this threshold externally, and the threshold for smoking exposure remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the threshold of pack-years of smoking associated with survival and tumor recurrence among patients with head and neck cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-institution, cohort study included patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiation from January 2005 to April 2021. Data were analyzed from January to April 2022.

EXPOSURES

Heavy vs light smoking using 22 pack-years as a threshold based on maximizing log-rank test statistic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure (LRF), and distant failure (DF).

RESULTS

A total of 518 patients (427 male [82.4%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [55-66] years) were included. Median (IQR) follow-up was 44.1 (22.3-72.8) months. A nonlinear Cox regression model using restricted cubic splines showed continuous worsening of OS and PFS outcomes as pack-years of smoking increased. The threshold of pack-years to estimate OS and PFS was 22. Cox multivariable analysis (MVA) showed that more than 22 pack-years was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.22; P = .01) and PFS (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.89; P = .048). On Fine-Gray MVA, heavy smokers were associated with DF (aHR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02-2.88; P = .04), but not LRF (aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.61-1.87; P = .82). When 10 pack-years of smoking were used as a threshold, there was no association for OS (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.83-1.81; P = .30), PFS (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.78-1.57; P = .56), LRF (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.64-2.21; P = .58), and DF (aHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.82-2.56; P = .20). Current smoking was associated with worse OS and PFS only among human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumors (OS: aHR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.26-6.29; P = .01; PFS: aHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.22-5.14; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients treated with definitive chemoradiation, 22 pack-years of smoking was associated with survival and distant metastasis outcomes. Current smoking status was associated with adverse outcomes only among patients with HPV-associated head and neck cancer.

Defining the optimal threshold and prognostic utility of pre-treatment hemoglobin level as a biomarker for survival outcomes in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to define the optimal threshold for anemia in North American head and neck cancer patients and evaluate its role as a prognostic biomarker.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution database was queried for patients with head and neck cancer who underwent chemoradiation from January 2005 to April 2021. An optimal threshold of hemoglobin (Hgb) level was defined based on maximum log-rank test statistic. Cox multivariable analysis (MVA), Kaplan-Meier, and propensity score matching were performed to evaluate treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were identified. Threshold for Hgb was determined to be 11.4 for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Low Hgb was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53-3.80, p < 0.001) and PFS (aHR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.30-3.11, p = 0.002). Similar findings were observed among 39 matched pairs for OS (5-year OS 22.3 % vs 49.0 %; HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.23-4.03, p = 0.008) and PFS (5-year PFS 24.3 % vs 39.1 %; HR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.02-3.12, p = 0.04). Among those with HPV-negative tumors, low Hgb was associated with worse OS (aHR 13.90, 95 % CI 4.66-41.44, p < 0.001) and PFS (aHR 5.24, 95 % CI 2.09-13.18, p < 0.001). However, among those with HPV-positive tumors, low Hgb was not associated with both OS (aHR 1.75, 95 % CI 0.60-5.09, p = 0.31) and PFS (aHR 1.13, 95 % CI 0.41-3.14, p = 0.82).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Low Hgb below 11.4 was an independent adverse prognostic factor for worse survival. It was also prognostic among patients with HPV-negative tumors, but not for HPV-positive tumors.

Evaluation of Optimal Threshold of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Its Association With Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Given the role of inflammation in cancer progression, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) from peripheral blood has been suggested as a readout of systemic inflammation and a prognostic marker in several solid malignant neoplasms. However, optimal threshold for NLR in US patients with head and neck cancer remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the optimal NLR threshold as a potential prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution. Participants included 496 patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer who underwent chemoradiation from April 2007 to March 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from September to December 2021.

EXPOSURES

High vs low NLR.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients (411 male patients [82.9%]; 432 White patients [87.1%]; 64 patients with other race or ethnicity [12.9%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [55-67] years) were identified. Median (IQR) follow-up was 44.4 (22.8-74.0) months. Thresholds of NLR for both OS and CSS were 5.71. High NLR above 5.71 was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.26-3.09; P = .003) and CSS (aHR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.38-3.95; P = .002). On logistic multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to have high NLR if they had higher T and N staging (T3-4: aOR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.92-9.16; P < .001; N2: aOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.04-9.17; P = .049; N3: aOR, 11.21; 95% CI, 2.84-46.97; P < .001), but less likely if they had a good performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status 90-100: aOR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59; P < .001). Among 331 patients (66.7%) with available human papillomavirus (HPV) data, high NLR was not associated with OS (HPV-negative: aHR, 2.46; 95% CI, 0.96-6.31; P = .06; HPV-positive: aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.38-3.56; P = .78) and CSS (HPV-negative: aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 0.81-7.99; P = .11; HPV-positive: aHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.44-4.76; P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

High NLR was associated with worse survival. Patients with substantial disease burden and poor performance status were more likely to have high NLR. These findings suggest that further studies would be warranted to investigate the role of such prognostic marker to identify patients at risk to tailor interventions.

Less is more: Postoperative pain management using restrictive opioid protocols in all surgical services in a comprehensive cancer center

103

Background: Opioids are routinely given for postoperative pain management with limited evidence on the amount needed to be dispensed. Prescribed opioids increase the risk of chronic use, abuse, and diversion, which contribute to the opioid epidemic. We sought to demonstrate that postsurgical acute pain can be effectively managed across different surgical specialties with a markedly reduced number of opioids. Methods: A prospective case-control study of restrictive opioid prescription protocol (ROPP) was implemented in all surgical services from February 2019 through July 2019 at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center for all patients undergoing a surgery for which opioids would be routinely prescribed at discharge (n = 2,015). Data from surgeries performed by the same services from August 2018 through January 2019 were used for comparison (n = 2,051). At discharge, patients did not routinely receive opioids unless they had a maximally invasive procedure or if they required multiple doses of opioids during hospitalization (maximum 3-day supply). Compliance with the protocol was tracked by pharmacists daily. Patient demographics and surgical details were collected. State-run opioid prescription database was used to determine the number of opioids prescribed to all surgical patients within a 120-day surgical window. Validated patient satisfaction surveys were used at postoperative visits to assess patient experience. Results: After implementation of the ROPP, 45% less opioids were prescribed after surgery for all participating patients (323,674 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) vs 179,458 MME, p < 0.001). The majority of services complied with the ROPP in more than 95% of cases. There was no difference in postsurgical pain intensity between cohorts. Patients in the ROPP cohort had less refill requests compared to the control group (20.9% vs 17.9%, p value = 0.016). Surveys were completed by 338 patients in the control group (16.5%) and 360 in the ROPP group (17.9%). There was no significant difference in patient reported satisfaction with postoperative pain control or on the impact of pain on daily activities between the cohorts. Conclusions: Implementation of a ROPP by multiple surgical services at a tertiary cancer center was feasible and resulted in substantial decrease in the number of opioids prescribed while not compromising patient experience. Patients did not require more prescription refills despite being provided no opioids or a limited supply. This study provides evidence to support reducing the number of opioids routinely prescribed after surgery.[Table: see text]

Evaluation of radiation treatment volumes for unknown primaries of the head and neck in the era of FDG PET

Objectives

Positron-emission tomography (PET) has improved identification of the primary tumor as well as occult nodal burden in cancer of the head and neck. Nevertheless, there are still patients where the primary tumor cannot be located. In these situations, the standard of care is comprehensive head and neck radiation therapy however it is unclear whether this is necessary. This study examines the effects of radiation treatment volume on outcomes among using data from two cancer centers in unknown primary carcinoma of the head and neck.

Methods

Patients received unilateral (n = 34), or bilateral radiation (n = 28). Patient factors such as age, gender, smoking history, and patterns of failure were compared using Mann Whitney U and Chi Square. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) trends were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Effect of treatment volume on survival was examined using multivariate cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the frequency of local (p = 0.32), regional (p = 0.50), or distant (p = 0.76) failures between unilateral and bilateral radiation therapy. By Kaplan-Meier estimates, OS (3-year OS bilateral = 71.67%, unilateral = 77.90%, p = 0.50) and DFS (3-year DFS bilateral = 77.92%, unilateral = 69.43%, p = 0.63) were similar between the two treatment approaches. Lastly, multivariate analysis did not demonstrate any significant differences in outcome by treatment volumes (OS: HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.81, p = 0.51; DFS: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.24, 1.93, p = 0.47).

Conclusions

Unilateral radiation therapy compared with bilateral produced similar survival.

Small form factor, flexible, dual-modality handheld probe for smartphone-based, point-of-care oral and oropharyngeal cancer screening

Oral cancer is a growing health issue in low- and middle-income countries due to betel quid, tobacco, and alcohol use and in younger populations of middle- and high-income communities due to the prevalence of human papillomavirus. The described point-of-care, smartphone-based intraoral probe enables autofluorescence imaging and polarized white light imaging in a compact geometry through the use of a USB-connected camera module. The small size and flexible imaging head improves on previous intraoral probe designs and allows imaging the cheek pockets, tonsils, and base of tongue, the areas of greatest risk for both causes of oral cancer. Cloud-based remote specialist and convolutional neural network clinical diagnosis allow for both remote community and home use. The device is characterized and preliminary field-testing data are shared.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the mesentery: a clinical dilemma

Although rare, extra-pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are becoming increasingly recognized. While surgical resection is currently an effective and accepted treatment for IMTs, the optimal management of unresectable or residual IMTs remains a clinical dilemma. We present the case of an incompletely resected IMT treated successfully with anti-inflammatory therapy alone, and describe the rationale for this approach.

Analysis of binding interactions of pepsin inhibitor-3 to mammalian and malarial aspartic proteases

The nematode Ascaris suum primarily infects pigs, but also causes disease in humans. As part of its survival mechanism in the intestinal tract of the host, the worm produces a number of protease inhibitors, including pepsin inhibitor-3 (PI3), a 17 kDa protein. Recombinant PI3 expressed in E. coli has previously been shown to be a competitive inhibitor of a subgroup of aspartic proteinases: pepsin, gastricsin and cathepsin E. The previously determined crystal structure of the complex of PI3 with porcine pepsin (p. pepsin) showed that there are two regions of contact between PI3 and the enzyme. The first three N-terminal residues (QFL) bind into the prime side of the active site cleft and a polyproline helix (139-143) in the C-terminal domain of PI3 packs against residues 289-295 that form a loop in p. pepsin. Mutational analysis of both inhibitor regions was conducted to assess their contributions to the binding affinity for p. pepsin, human pepsin (h. pepsin) and several malarial aspartic proteases, the plasmepsins. Overall, the polyproline mutations have a limited influence on the Ki values for all the enzymes tested, with the values for p. pepsin remaining in the low-nanomolar range. The largest effect was seen with a Q1L mutant, with a 200-fold decrease in Ki for plasmepsin 2 from Plasmodium falciparum (PfPM2). Thermodynamic measurements of the binding of PI3 to p. pepsin and PfPM2 showed that inhibition of the enzymes is an entropy-driven reaction. Further analysis of the Q1L mutant showed that the increase in binding affinity to PfPM2 was due to improvements in both entropy and enthalpy.

National serologic survey of measles immunity among persons 6 years of age or older, 1988-1994

CONTEXT

Measles incidence in the United States is at a record low, and indigenous transmission has been interrupted in each year since 1996, suggesting that measles is no longer endemic. A national estimate of measles immunity and an understanding of predictors of measles susceptibility are essential for assuring sustained elimination of endemic disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patterns of immunity and to determine predictors of susceptibility to measles.

DESIGN/SETTING

Sera and data on participants from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994) (NHANES III) were examined. NHANES III was a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States.

POPULATION

20,100 persons 6 years of age or older were tested for measles-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody by an enzyme immunoassay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Participants with serum positive for measles antibody were considered protected or immune to measles disease.

RESULTS

Prevalence of measles immunity was 93%. Nearly all persons (99%) born in the prevaccine era (before 1957) were immune. Immunity declined among persons born in the vaccine era (after 1956) to 81% among those born in 1967-1976, and increased again to 89% among those born in 1977-1988. Among persons born in the vaccine era, independent predictors of measles susceptibility varied by birth cohort and included birth in the United States, residence in a noncrowded household, residence in a nonmetropolitan area, and, among males, non-Hispanic white and Mexican American race/ethnicity. Among adults 17 years of age or older, additional predictors of susceptibility included living at or above the poverty line and not currently being married.

CONCLUSIONS

Population immunity among persons 6 years of age or older is very high; however, as many as 15 million persons across the United States may lack humoral immunity. While it is unclear that the susceptible population can support continuous, indigenous transmission of measles, providers should follow current recommendations to evaluate the measles susceptibility of patients born in the vaccine era and vaccinate eligible patients.

Timing and effectiveness of requirements for a second dose of measles vaccine

OBJECTIVE

Previous measles elimination goals have failed in the United States despite high coverage of schoolchildren with a single dose of measles vaccine. Since 1989 advisory groups have recommended that schoolchildren receive a second dose of measles vaccine as part of a revised strategy to eliminate measles from the US. States have responded by phasing in requirements for a second dose of measles vaccine at school entry for various age groups at primary school entrance, secondary school entrance or both. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of the requirements for a second dose of measles vaccine and to determine whether a primary or secondary school entrance requirement was more effective in lowering measles incidence.

METHODS

Using national surveillance data we examined the influence of state requirements for the second dose of measles vaccine on measles incidence from 1993 through 1995.

RESULTS

Overall measles incidence was lower in states that had a requirement for a second dose of measles vaccine at either primary school entrance [relative risk (RR) = 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.49] or secondary school entrance (RR = 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.50), compared with states without a second dose requirement. Incidence was lowest in states that required a second dose of measles vaccine at both primary and secondary school entrance (RR = 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that a requirement for a second dose of measles vaccine at either primary or secondary school entrance is effective in lowering measles incidence, with a greater reduction occurring in states where the second dose is required for both age groups.

AIDS knowledge gaps: results from the first decade of the epidemic and implications for future public information efforts

Throughout the first decade of AIDS, certain populations have been disproportionately affected by its spread, particularly men, blacks, Hispanics, and the young. Just as there are population differences in the spread of the disease, there are differences in knowledge about the disease as well. This article applies the knowledge gap framework to examine the nature and magnitude of gaps in knowledge among different populations. The analysis shows that persons of low education lag behind other groups in true-transmission knowledge (i.e., knowledge about ways in which HIV/AIDS actually is transmitted) and false-transmission knowledge (i.e., misconceptions about how the disease is spread).