1
|
Buchele C, Renkamp CK, Regnery S, Behnisch R, Rippke C, Schlüter F, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J, Alber M, Klüter S. Intrafraction organ movement in adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy of abdominal lesions - dosimetric impact and how to detect its extent in advance. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:80. [PMID: 38918828 PMCID: PMC11202341 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02466-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) allows daily adaptation of treatment plans to compensate for positional changes of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). However, current adaptation times are relatively long and organ movement occurring during the adaptation process might offset the benefit gained by adaptation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of these intrafractional changes. Additionally, a method to predict the extent of organ movement before the first treatment was evaluated in order to have the possibility to compensate for them, for example by adding additional margins to OARs. MATERIALS & METHODS Twenty patients receiving adaptive MRgRT for treatment of abdominal lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired at the start of adaptation and immediately before irradiation were used to calculate adapted and pre-irradiation dose in OARs directly next to the planning target volume. The extent of organ movement was determined on MR images acquired during simulation sessions and adaptive treatments, and their agreement was evaluated. Correlation between the magnitude of organ movement during simulation and the duration of simulation session was analyzed in order to assess whether organ movement might be relevant even if the adaptation process could be accelerated in the future. RESULTS A significant increase in dose constraint violations was observed from adapted (6.9%) to pre-irradiation (30.2%) dose distributions. Overall, OAR dose increased significantly by 4.3% due to intrafractional organ movement. Median changes in organ position of 7.5 mm (range 1.5-10.5 mm) were detected within a median time of 17.1 min (range 1.6-28.7 min). Good agreement was found between the range of organ movement during simulation and adaptation (66.8%), especially if simulation sessions were longer and multiple MR images were acquired. No correlation was determined between duration of simulation sessions and magnitude of organ movement. CONCLUSION Intrafractional organ movement can impact dose distributions and lead to violations of OAR tolerance doses, which impairs the benefit of daily on-table plan adaptation. By application of simulation images, the extent of intrafractional organ movement can be predicted, which possibly allows to compensate for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rouven Behnisch
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borderías-Villarroel E, Barragán-Montero A, Sterpin E. Time is NTCP: Should we maximize patient throughput or perform online adaptation on proton therapy systems? Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110389. [PMID: 38885906 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to conventional radiotherapy (XT), proton therapy (PT) may improve normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). However, PT typically requires higher adaptation rates due to an increased sensitivity to anatomical changes. Systematic online adaptation may address this issue, but it requires additional replanning time, decreasing patient throughput. Therefore, less patients would benefit in such case from PT for a given machine capacity, with results in worse NTCP. AIM To investigate the trade-off between PT patient throughput and NTCP gain as a function of the time needed for adaptation. METHODS A retrospective database of 14 lung patients with two repeated 4DCTs was used to compare NTCP values between XT and PT for NTCP2ym (2-year mortality), NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis. Four scenarios were considered for PT: no adaptation using clinical robustness parameters (4D robust optimization, 3 % range error and PTV-equivalent setup errors); systematic online adaptation with clinical robustness parameters; setup errors reduced to 4 mm and to 2 mm. Dose was accumulated on the planning CT. The number of patients treated with PT depended on the extra time needed for adaptation, assuming an 8-hours capacity (assuming 14 patients a day; thus minimum 34.2 min per treatment session if there is no or instantaneous adaptation). RESULTS Baseline NTCP gains (PT against XT without adaptation) equaled 6.9 %, 6.1 %, and 7.7 % for NTCP2ym, NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis, respectively. Using instantaneous online adaptation and setup errors of 2 mm, the overall gains were then 10.7 %, 13.6 % and 12.4 %. Taking into account loss of capacity, 13.7 min was the maximum extra-time allowed to complete adaptation and maintain an advantage on all three metrics for the 2-mm setup error scenario. CONCLUSION This study highlights the critical importance of keeping short online adaptation times when using systems with limited capacity like PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Borderías-Villarroel
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Barragán-Montero
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Sterpin
- UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of external radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hering S, Nieto A, Marschner S, Hofmaier J, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, da Silva Mendes V, Landry G, Niyazi M, Manapov F, Belka C, Corradini S, Eze C. The role of online MR-guided multi-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in lung tumours. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100736. [PMID: 38433949 PMCID: PMC10909605 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the dosimetry benefits, changes in pulmonary function, and clinical outcome of online adaptive MR-guided SBRT. Methods From 11/2020-07/2022, 45 consecutive patients with 59 lesions underwent multi-fraction SBRT (3-8 fractions) at our institution. Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-proven NSCLC or lung cancer/metastases diagnosed via clinical imaging. Endpoints were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). We evaluated PTV/GTV dose coverage, organs at risk exposure, and changes in pulmonary function (PF). Acute toxicity was classified per the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results The median PTV was 14.4 cm3 (range: 3.4 - 96.5 cm3). In total 195/215 (91%) plans were reoptimised. In the reoptimised vs. predicted plans, PTV coverage by the prescribed dose increased in 94.6% of all fractions with a median increase in PTV VPD of 5.6% (range: -1.8 - 44.6%, p < 0.001), increasing the number of fractions with PTV VPD ≥ 95% from 33% to 98%. The PTV D95% and D98% (BED10) increased in 93% and 95% of all fractions with a median increase of 7.7% (p < 0.001) and 10.6% (p < 0.001). The PTV D95% (BED10) increased by a mean of 9.6 Gy (SD: 10.3 Gy, p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 21.4 months (95% CI: 12.3-27.0 months), 1- and 2-year LC rates were 94.8% (95% CI: 87.6 - 100.0%) and 91.1% (95% CI: 81.3 - 100%); 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85.6% (95% CI: 75.0 - 96.3%) and 67.1 % (95% CI: 50.3 - 83.8%). One grade ≥ 3 toxicity and no significant reduction in short-term PF parameters were recorded. Conclusions Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT is an effective, safe and generally well tolerated treatment option for lung tumours achieving encouraging local control rates with significantly improved target volume coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nieto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shouman MA, Fuchs F, Walter F, Corradini S, Westphalen CB, Vornhülz M, Beyer G, Andrade D, Belka C, Niyazi M, Rogowski P. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer - A systematic review of prospective data. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100738. [PMID: 38370495 PMCID: PMC10873666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the current prospective evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in various clinical contexts for pancreatic cancer including its use as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), salvage therapy for isolated local recurrence (ILR), adjuvant therapy after radical resection, and as a palliative treatment. Special attention is given to the application of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the Medline database via PubMed was conducted focusing on prospective studies published within the past decade. Data were extracted concerning study characteristics, outcome measures, toxicity profiles, SBRT dosage and fractionation regimens, as well as additional systemic therapies. Results and conclusion 31 studies with in total 1,571 patients were included in this review encompassing 14 studies for LAPC, 9 for neoadjuvant treatment, 2 for adjuvant treatment, 2 for ILR, with an additional 4 studies evaluating MRgRT. In LAPC, SBRT demonstrates encouraging results, characterized by favorable local control rates. Several studies even report conversion to resectable disease with substantial resection rates reaching 39%. The adoption of MRgRT may provide a solution to the challenge to deliver ablative doses while minimizing severe toxicities. In BRPC, select prospective studies combining preoperative ablative-dose SBRT with modern induction systemic therapies have achieved remarkable resection rates of up to 80%. MRgRT also holds potential in this context. Adjuvant SBRT does not appear to confer relevant advantages over chemotherapy. While prospective data for SBRT in ILR and for palliative pain relief are limited, they corroborate positive findings from retrospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A Shouman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Frederik Fuchs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlies Vornhülz
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Beyer
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorian Andrade
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiong Y, Rabe M, Rippke C, Kawula M, Nierer L, Klüter S, Belka C, Niyazi M, Hörner-Rieber J, Corradini S, Landry G, Kurz C. Impact of daily plan adaptation on accumulated doses in ultra-hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100562. [PMID: 38463219 PMCID: PMC10924058 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Ultra-hypofractionated online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is promising for prostate cancer. However, the impact of online adaptation on target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing at the level of accumulated dose has not yet been reported. Using deformable image registration (DIR)-based accumulation, we compared the delivered adapted dose with the simulated non-adapted dose. Materials and methods Twenty-three prostate cancer patients treated at two clinics with 0.35 T magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) following the same treatment protocol (5 × 7.5 Gy with urethral sparing and daily adaptation) were included. The fraction MR images were deformably registered to the planning MR image. Both non-adapted and adapted fraction doses were accumulated with the corresponding vector fields. Two DIR approaches were implemented. PTV* (planning target volume minus urethra+2mm) D95%, CTV* (clinical target volume minus urethra) D98%, and OARs (urethra+2mm, bladder, and rectum) D0.2cc, were evaluated. Statistical significance was inferred from a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Results Normalized to the baseline, the accumulated PTV* D95% increased significantly by 2.7 % ([1.5, 4.3]%) through adaptation, and the CTV* D98% by 1.2 % ([0.1, 1.7]%). For the OARs after adaptation, accumulated bladder D0.2cc decreased by 0.4 % ([-1.2, 0.4]%), urethra+2mmD0.2cc by 0.8 % ([-1.6, -0.1]%), while rectum D0.2cc increased by 2.6 % ([1.2, 4.9]%). For all patients, rectum D0.2cc was still below the clinical constraint. Results of both DIR approaches differed on average by less than 0.2 %. Conclusions Online adaptation in MRgRT improved target coverage and OARs sparing at the level of accumulated dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqing Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, a Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Young T, Lee M, Johnston M, Nguyen T, Ko R, Arumugam S. Assessment of interfraction dose variation in pancreas SBRT using daily simulation MR images. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1619-1627. [PMID: 37747645 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01324-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic Cancer is associated with poor treatment outcomes compared to other cancers. High local control rates have been achieved by using hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat pancreatic cancer. Challenges in delivering SBRT include close proximity of several organs at risk (OARs) and target volume inter and intra fraction positional variations. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy has shown potential for online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer, with superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of target and OAR volumes for different treatment approaches for pancreatic cancer, and to assess the suitability of utilizing a treatment-day MRI for treatment planning purposes. Ten healthy volunteers were scanned on a Siemens Skyra 3 T MRI scanner over two sessions (approximately 3 h apart), per day over 5 days to simulate an SBRT daily simulation scan for treatment planning. A pretreatment scan was also done to simulate patient setup and treatment. A 4D MRI scan was taken at each session for internal target volume (ITV) generation and assessment. For each volunteer a treatment plan was generated in the Raystation treatment planning system (TPS) following departmental protocols on the day one, first session dataset (D1S1), with bulk density overrides applied to enable dose calculation. This treatment plan was propagated through other imaging sessions, and the dose calculated. An additional treatment plan was generated on each first session of each day (S1) to simulate a daily replan process, with this plan propagated to the second session of the day. These accumulated mock treatment doses were assessed against the original treatment plan through DVH comparison of the PTV and OAR volumes. The generated ITV showed large variations when compared to both the first session ITV and daily ITV, with an average magnitude of 22.44% ± 13.28% and 25.83% ± 37.48% respectively. The PTV D95 was reduced by approximately 23.3% for both plan comparisons considered. Surrounding OARs had large variations in dose, with the small bowel V30 increasing by 128.87% when compared to the D1S1 plan, and 43.11% when compared to each daily S1 plan. Daily online adaptive radiotherapy is required for accurate dose delivery for pancreas cancer in the absence of additional motion management and tumour tracking techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Young
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.
- Ingham Institute, Sydney, Australia.
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Mark Lee
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Theresa Nguyen
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Ko
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sankar Arumugam
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute, Sydney, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rabe M, Paganelli C, Schmitz H, Meschini G, Riboldi M, Hofmaier J, Nierer-Kohlhase L, Dinkel J, Reiner M, Parodi K, Belka C, Landry G, Kurz C, Kamp F. Continuous time-resolved estimated synthetic 4D-CTs for dose reconstruction of lung tumor treatments at a 0.35 T MR-linac. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:235008. [PMID: 37669669 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf6f0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To experimentally validate a method to create continuous time-resolved estimated synthetic 4D-computed tomography datasets (tresCTs) based on orthogonal cine MRI data for lung cancer treatments at a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided linear accelerator (MR-linac).Approach.A breathing porcine lung phantom was scanned at a CT scanner and 0.35 T MR-linac. Orthogonal cine MRI series (sagittal/coronal orientation) at 7.3 Hz, intersecting tumor-mimicking gelatin nodules, were deformably registered to mid-exhale 3D-CT and 3D-MRI datasets. The time-resolved deformation vector fields were extrapolated to 3D and applied to a reference synthetic 3D-CT image (sCTref), while accounting for breathing phase-dependent lung density variations, to create 82 s long tresCTs at 3.65 Hz. Ten tresCTs were created for ten tracked nodules with different motion patterns in two lungs. For each dataset, a treatment plan was created on the mid-exhale phase of a measured ground truth (GT) respiratory-correlated 4D-CT dataset with the tracked nodule as gross tumor volume (GTV). Each plan was recalculated on the GT 4D-CT, randomly sampled tresCT, and static sCTrefimages. Dose distributions for corresponding breathing phases were compared in gamma (2%/2 mm) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameter analyses.Main results.The mean gamma pass rate between all tresCT and GT 4D-CT dose distributions was 98.6%. The mean absolute relative deviations of the tresCT with respect to GT DVH parameters were 1.9%, 1.0%, and 1.4% for the GTVD98%,D50%, andD2%, respectively, 1.0% for the remaining nodulesD50%, and 1.5% for the lungV20Gy. The gamma pass rate for the tresCTs was significantly larger (p< 0.01), and the GTVD50%deviations with respect to the GT were significantly smaller (p< 0.01) than for the sCTref.Significance.The results suggest that tresCTs could be valuable for time-resolved reconstruction and intrafractional accumulation of the dose to the GTV for lung cancer patients treated at MR-linacs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Henning Schmitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giorgia Meschini
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching (Munich), Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Nierer-Kohlhase
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching (Munich), Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chiang CH, Chao TY, Huang MY. Adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with intra‑fractional motion using the MRIdian system: A case report. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:487. [PMID: 37818131 PMCID: PMC10561135 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.14074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, when combined with radiotherapy, serves as an optional treatment for patients with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer and is usually performed in conjunction with complete mesocolic excision. The substantial movement of surrounding organs in cases of sigmoid colon cancer frequently leads to toxicity in normal tissues. The present report details the case of a 76-year-old man diagnosed with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer. Initially, treatment using the Tomotherapy Hi-Art system was selected; however, during image guidance from the first to the sixth fractions, the tumor location underwent a marked change, exceeding the range of the planning target volume. Efforts to recapture the image were unsuccessful, leading to a decision to transition the patient to the MRIdian system for daily treatment with online adaptive radiotherapy. The positional variations in the tumor were evident in each treatment using the MRIdian system, with mean shifts of 2.58 cm in the right-left direction, 1.24 cm in the cranial-caudal direction and 0.40 cm in the anterior-posterior direction. The mean time from the entry of the patient to treatment completion was 41 min. Adaptive treatment plans were performed for all 19 fractions, with two treatments repeated due to the tumor moving out of tracking range. Following irradiation using the MRIdian system, the gross tumor volume decreased by 62%. Notably, the patient experienced no side effects during treatment. A CT scan conducted 3 months after radiotherapy revealed a marked reduction in the tumor size, consistent with a partial response, leading to the scheduling of surgery. Following surgery, a CT scan after 6 months revealed no local recurrence in the surgical bed region. The findings in the present case support the feasibility of implementing an adaptive treatment plan using the MRIdian system for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer in the context of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Han Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Tzu-Yuan Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ming-Yii Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan, R.O.C
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan, R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Song Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhao M, Guan F, Li Z, Yue J. Case Report: MR-LINAC-guided adaptive radiotherapy for gastric cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1159197. [PMID: 37746250 PMCID: PMC10514477 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1159197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The stomach is one of the most deformable organs. Its shape can be easily affected by breathing movements, and daily diet, and it also varies when the body position is different. The susceptibility of stomach has made it challenging to treat gastric cancer using the conventional image-guided radiotherapy, i.e., the techniques based on kilovoltage X-ray imaging. The magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is usually implemented using a hybrid system MR-LINAC. It is feasible to implement adaptive radiotherapy using MR-LINAC for deformable organs such as stomach. In this case report, we present our clinical experience to treat a gastric cancer patient using MR-LINAC. Case description The patient is a 58-year-old male who started having black stools with no apparent cause a year ago. Gastroscopy result showed pancreatic cancer, pathology: adenocarcinoma on gastric cancer biopsy, adenocarcinoma on gastric body minor curvature biopsy. The patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma, cTxN+M1, stage IV, HER-2 positive). The patient was treated in 25 fractions with radiotherapy using MR-LINAC with online adaptive treatment plans daily. The target area in daily MR images varied considerably when compared with the target area on the CT simulation images. During the course of treatment, there have even been instances where the planned target area where the patient received radiotherapy did not cover the lesion of the day. Conclusion Online adaptive MRgRT can be a meaningful innovation for treating malignancies in the upper abdomen. The results in the current study are promising and are indicative for further optimizing online adaptive MRgRT in patients with inoperable tumors of the upper abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajun Song
- Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Huadong Wang
- Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Mengyu Zhao
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Fada Guan
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Zhenjiang Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jinbo Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith D, Knight K, Sim J, Lim Joon D, Foroudi F, Khoo V. A planning-based feasibility study of MR-Linac treatment for anal cancer radiation therapy. Med Dosim 2023; 48:267-272. [PMID: 37507334 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The hybrid magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanner and radiation therapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes for anal cancer (AC) patients with improved soft tissue visualization and daily plan adaption but has planning and delivery limitations due to the incorporation of MRI. We aimed to identify if Elekta Unity MR-Linac-based radiation therapy is feasible for anal cancer. Ten prospectively enrolled AC patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy were replanned for MR-Linac treatment using departmental planning criteria. For comparison, and to reduce interobserver variability, volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy (VMAT) plans were also created for each patient by the same single senior radiation therapist. Plans were compared using departmental dosimetric plan criteria, as well as conformity and homogeneity indices, monitor units (MUs) and measured plan delivery (beam-on) time. Results were deemed clinically acceptable. Target and organ at risk (OAR) doses were comparable between MR-Linac plans and VMAT plans, although PTV45Gy D98% coverage was compromised in 3 of 10 MR-Linac plans due to caudocranial length exceeding the limits of the MR-Linac. MR-Linac plans had lower MUs, median of 689.1 vs 849.65 (p = 0.002), but took over twice as long to deliver, 529.5s vs 224s (p = <0.0001) as VMAT plans. MR-Linac planning and treatment of AC is feasible for a subset of patients. The current physical limitations of the Elekta Unity system mean patients with large caudocranial elective PTV45Gy target volumes may not be covered dosimetrically to the required clinical standard. Longer image verification and treatment delivery times of the MR-Linac also mean patient selection and intrafractional IGRT are likely to be integral to ensuring high quality clinical outcomes in this rare cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Kellie Knight
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Jenny Sim
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peng H, Zhang J, Xu N, Zhou Y, Tan H, Ren T. Fan beam CT-guided online adaptive external radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer: a dosimetric evaluation. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:588. [PMID: 37365516 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11089-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To discuss the dosimetric advantages and reliability of the accurate delivery of online adaptive radiotherapy(online ART) for uterine cervical cancer(UCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Six UCC patients were enrolled in this study. 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) reached 100% of the prescription dose (50.4 Gy/28fractions/6weeks) was required. The patients were scanned with uRT-Linac 506c KV-FBCT then the target volume (TV) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated by doctors. The dosimeters designed and obtained a routine plan (Plan0). KV-FBCT was used for image guidance before subsequent fractional treatment. The online ART was processed after registration, which acquired a virtual nonadaptive radiotherapy plan (VPlan) and an adaptive plan (APlan). VPlan was the direct calculation of Plan0 on the fractional image, while APlan required adaptive optimization and calculation. In vivo dose monitoring and three-dimensional dose reconstruction were required during the implementation of APlan. RESULTS The inter-fractional volumes of the bladder and rectum changed greatly among the treatments. These changes influenced the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and the position deviation of GTVp and PTV and positively affected the prescription dose coverage of TV. GTVp decreased gradually along with dose accumulation. The Dmax, D98, D95, D50, and D2 of APlan were superior to those of VPlan in target dose distribution. APlan had good conformal index, homogeneity index and target coverage. The rectum V40 and Dmax, bladder V40, the small bowel V40 and Dmax of APlan were better than that of VPlan. The APlan's fractional mean γ passing rate was significantly higher than the international standard and the mean γ passing rate of all cases after the three-dimensional reconstruction was higher than 97.0%. CONCLUSION Online ART in external radiotherapy of UCC significantly improved the dose distribution and can become an ideal technology to achieve individualized precise radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haibo Peng
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
- Key Clinical Specialty of Sichuan Province (Oncology Department), The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
- Clinical Medical School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
- Key Clinical Specialty of Sichuan Province (Oncology Department), The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
- Clinical Medical School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
| | - Ningyue Xu
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
| | - Yangang Zhou
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
| | - Huigang Tan
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China
| | - Tao Ren
- Oncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China.
- Key Clinical Specialty of Sichuan Province (Oncology Department), The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China.
- Clinical Medical School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, 610500, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mireștean CC, Iancu RI, Iancu DPT. Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) and Delta (Δ) Radiomics-An Urgent Alliance for the Front Line of the War against Head and Neck Cancers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2045. [PMID: 37370940 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of a biomarker that is response predictive could offer a solution for the stratification of the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNC) in the context of high recurrence rates, especially those associated with loco-regional failure. Delta (Δ) radiomics, a concept based on the variation of parameters extracted from medical imaging using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, demonstrates its potential as a predictive biomarker of treatment response in HNC. The concept of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), including computer tomography simulation (CT) and position control imaging with cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT), now offers new perspectives for radiomics applied in radiotherapy. The use of Δ features of texture, shape, and size, both from the primary tumor and from the tumor-involved lymph nodes, demonstrates the best predictive accuracy. If, in the case of treatment response, promising Δ radiomics results could be obtained, even after 24 h from the start of treatment, for radiation-induced xerostomia, the evaluation of Δ radiomics in the middle of treatment could be recommended. The fused models (clinical and Δ radiomics) seem to offer benefits, both in comparison to the clinical model and to the radiomic model. The selection of patients who benefit from induction chemotherapy is underestimated in Δ radiomic studies and may be an unexplored territory with major potential. The advantage offered by "in house" simulation CT and CBCT favors the rapid implementation of Δ radiomics studies in radiotherapy departments. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT Δ radiomics could guide the new concepts of dose escalation on radio-resistant sub-volumes based on radiobiological criteria, but also guide the "next level" of HNC adaptive radiotherapy (ART).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camil Ciprian Mireștean
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
- Department of Surgery, Railways Clinical Hospital Iasi, 700506 Iași, Romania
| | - Roxana Irina Iancu
- Oral Pathology Department, "Gr. T. Popa" Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, "St. Spiridon" Emergency Universitary Hospital, 700111 Iași, Romania
| | - Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu
- Oncology and Radiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iași, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weykamp F, Hoegen P, Regnery S, Katsigiannopulos E, Renkamp CK, Lang K, König L, Sandrini E, Meixner E, Rippke C, Buchele C, Liermann J, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Long-Term Clinical Results of MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2786. [PMID: 37345123 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Magnetic-resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for ablative, non-invasive treatment of liver metastases. However, long-term clinical outcome data are missing. (2) Methods: Patients received MR-guided SBRT with a MRIdian Linac between January 2019 and October 2021 and were part of an ongoing prospective observational registry. Local hepatic control (LHC), distant hepatic control (DHC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was documented according to CTCAE (v.5.0). (3) Results: Forty patients were treated for a total of 54 liver metastases (56% with online plan adaptation). Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy in five fractions equal to a biologically effective dose (BED) (alpha/beta = 10 Gy) of 100 Gy. At 1 and 2 years, LHC was 98% and 75%, DHC was 34% and 15%, PFS was 21% and 5% and OS was 83% and 57%. Two-year LHC was higher in case of BED > 100 Gy (100% vs. 57%; log-rank p = 0.04). Acute grade 1 and 2 toxicity (mostly nausea) occurred in 26% and 7% of the patients, with no grade ≥ 3 event. (4) Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of MR-guided liver SBRT. Long-term local control was promising and underscores the aim of achieving >100 Gy BED. Nonetheless, distant tumor control remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Side, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klaar R, Rabe M, Gaass T, Schneider MJ, Benlala I, Eze C, Corradini S, Belka C, Landry G, Kurz C, Dinkel J. Ventilation and perfusion MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac: feasibility and reproducibility study. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:58. [PMID: 37013541 PMCID: PMC10069152 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02244-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid devices that combine radiation therapy and MR-imaging have been introduced in the clinical routine for the treatment of lung cancer. This opened up not only possibilities in terms of accurate tumor tracking, dose delivery and adapted treatment planning, but also functional lung imaging. The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of Non-uniform Fourier Decomposition (NuFD) MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac as a potential treatment response assessment tool, and propose two signal normalization strategies for enhancing the reproducibility of the results. METHODS Ten healthy volunteers (median age 28 ± 8 years, five female, five male) were repeatedly scanned at a 0.35 T MR-Linac using an optimized 2D+t balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence for two coronal slice positions. Image series were acquired in normal free breathing with breaks inside and outside the scanner as well as deep and shallow breathing. Ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps were generated for each image series using NuFD. For intra-volunteer ventilation map reproducibility, a normalization factor was defined based on the linear correlation of the ventilation signal and diaphragm position of each scan as well as the diaphragm motion amplitude of a reference scan. This allowed for the correction of signal dependency on the diaphragm motion amplitude, which varies with breathing patterns. The second strategy, which can be used for ventilation and perfusion, eliminates the dependency on the signal amplitude by normalizing the ventilation/perfusion maps with the average ventilation/perfusion signal within a selected region-of-interest (ROI). The position and size dependency of this ROI was analyzed. To evaluate the performance of both approaches, the normalized ventilation/perfusion-weighted maps were compared and the deviation of the mean ventilation/perfusion signal from the reference was calculated for each scan. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to test whether the normalization methods can significantly improve the reproducibility of the ventilation/perfusion maps. RESULTS The ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps generated with the NuFD algorithm demonstrated a mostly homogenous distribution of signal intensity as expected for healthy volunteers regardless of the breathing maneuver and slice position. Evaluation of the ROI's size and position dependency showed small differences in the performance. Applying both normalization strategies improved the reproducibility of the ventilation by reducing the median deviation of all scans to 9.1%, 5.7% and 8.6% for the diaphragm-based, the best and worst performing ROI-based normalization, respectively, compared to 29.5% for the non-normalized scans. The significance of this improvement was confirmed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text]. A comparison of the techniques against each other revealed a significant difference in the performance between best ROI-based normalization and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]) and between best ROI-based normalization and scaling factor ([Formula: see text]), but not between scaling factor and worst ROI ([Formula: see text]). Using the ROI-based approach for the perfusion-maps, the uncorrected deviation of 10.2% was reduced to 5.3%, which was shown to be significant ([Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS Using NuFD for non-contrast enhanced functional lung MRI at a 0.35 T MR-Linac is feasible and produces plausible ventilation- and perfusion-weighted maps for volunteers without history of chronic pulmonary diseases utilizing different breathing patterns. The reproducibility of the results in repeated scans significantly benefits from the introduction of the two normalization strategies, making NuFD a potential candidate for fast and robust early treatment response assessment of lung cancer patients during MR-guided radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabea Klaar
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Gaass
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz J. Schneider
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Antaros Medical AB, BioVenture Hub, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Ilyes Benlala
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- Univ. Bordeaux, Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France
- CHU Bordeaux, Service d’Imagerie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire, Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Service d’Exploration Fonctionnelle Respiratoire, Unité de Pneumologie Pédiatrique, CIC 1401, F-33600 Pessac, France
- INSERM, U1045, Centre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julien Dinkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen F, Cheng YK, Chiang CH, Lu TY, Huang CJ. Simultaneous treatment of two lung cancer lesions with stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32626. [PMID: 36637933 PMCID: PMC9839273 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Lung cancer is 1 of the most prevalent cancers globally. Definitive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is suggested for those who are unfit for or refuse surgical intervention. Here we present a patient with 2 lung cancer lesions who received SABR simultaneously with magnetic resonance Linear accelerator (Linac)-magnetic resonance (MR). PATIENT CONCERNS A 46-years-old man had history of left lower lung cancer post lobectomy in 2018. Two recurrent tumors were found 2 years following, then became enlarged 4 months later. DIAGNOSES The recurrent tumors were found by computed tomography. INTERVENTIONS SABR was indicated due to inoperability and small size. Simulation was done both by computed tomography and MR scan with ViewRay MRIdian Linac, with the prescription dose being 50 gray in 4 fractions performed every other day within 2 weeks. The 2 lesions were irradiated at the same time with a single isocenter with mean treatment time was 78 minutes. OUTCOMES No acute side effect was noted. Follow-up chest computed tomography scan 14 months after SABR showed mild consolidation and pneumonitis over the upper irradiated site favoring radiation-related reasons, while pneumonitis was resolved over the lower irradiated site. Positron emission tomography showed no definite evidence of FDG-avid recurrence. The patient has survived over 18 months following SABR and more than 4 years from the first diagnosis of lung cancer without significant adverse effects. LESSONS Simultaneous SABR for multiple lung lesions is quite challenging because tumor motion by breathing can increase the risk of missing the target. With help by MR-Linac, simultaneous SABR to multiple lung lesions can be performed safely with efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Kai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Han Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Ying Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Jen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- * Correspondence: Chih-Jen Huang, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chuter RW, Brewster F, Retout L, Cree A, Aktürk N, Hales R, Benson R, Hoskin P, McWilliam A. Feasibility of using a dual isocentre technique for treating cervical cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:025017. [PMID: 36549006 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acae18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Patients treated for cervical cancer exhibit large inter and intra-fraction anatomical changes. The Unity MR-Linac (MRL) can image these patients with MR prior to and during treatment which enables daily plan adaptation. However, the MRL has a limited treatment field in the sup/inf direction of 22 cm which can restrict the treatment of patients who require longer treatment fields. Here we explore potential adaptive workflows in combination with a dual isocentre approach, to widen the range of cervix patients that can benefit from this treatment.Approach.Ten cervical cancer patients were retrospectively planned with a dual isocentre technique to deliver 45 Gy in 25 fractions. 5 node-negative and 5 node-positive patients were planned using the EMBRACE II protocol. A 2 cm overlap region between the two isocentres was positioned entirely in the nodal region. A treatment workflow was simulated to account for inter-fraction anatomical change. Isocentre shifts of 3 and 6 mm were applied to investigate the effect of intra-fraction motion.Main results.Dual isocentre adapted plans ensured significantly better coverage than non-adapted (recalculated) plans with a larger benefit seen for the node-negative cases. The difference to the reference plan for the V4275 cGy to the ITV was -0.8 cGy and -8.2 cGy for the adapted and recalculated plans respectively. Movements superiorly did not affect the coverage of the ITV by more than 1%, but shifting it inferiorly caused the ITV coverage on the plan to reduce by ∼2.4% per mm.Significance.A dual isocentre technique for cervical cancer treatments and adaptive workflows have been demonstrated to recover the required plan quality for inter-fraction changes. This illustrates the feasibility of a dual isocentre technique for the MRL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Chuter
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Frank Brewster
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Retout
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Anthea Cree
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Nesrin Aktürk
- İzmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Radiation Oncology Clinic, Karabağlar, İzmir, TR, Turkey
| | - Rosie Hales
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Benson
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Michalet M, Bettaïeb O, Khalfi S, Ghorbel A, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Aillères N, Draghici R, De Méric De Bellefon M, Charissoux M, Boisselier P, Demontoy S, Marguerit A, Cabaillé M, Cantaloube M, Keskes A, Bouhafa T, Farcy-Jacquet MP, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Adrenal Gland Metastases: First Clinical Results. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010291. [PMID: 36615093 PMCID: PMC9821305 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic MR-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an interesting treatment option for adrenal gland metastases (AGM). We reviewed data from 12 consecutive patients treated with MRgRT for an AGM in our center between 14 November 2019 and 17 August 2021. Endpoints were tolerance assessment, the impact of adaptive treatment on target volume coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing, local control (LC), and overall survival (OS). The majority of patients were oligometastatic (58.3%), with 6 right AGM, 5 left AGM and 1 left and right AGM. The prescribed dose was 35 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions. The median PTV V95% on the initial plan was 95.74%. The median V95% of the PTVoptimized (PTVopt) on the initial plan was 95.26%. Thirty-eight (69%) fractions were adapted. The PTV coverage was significantly improved for adapted plans compared to predicted plans (median PTV V95% increased from 89.85% to 91.17%, p = 0.0478). The plan adaptation also significantly reduced Dmax for the stomach and small intestine. The treatment was well tolerated with no grade > 2 toxicities. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, the 1−year LC and OS rate were 100% and 91.7%. Six patients (50%) presented a metastatic progression, and one patient (8.3%) died of metastatic evolution during the follow-up. Adaptation of the treatment plan improved the overall dosimetric quality of MRI-guided radiotherapy. A longer follow-up is required to assess late toxicities and clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Michalet
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Ons Bettaïeb
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Samia Khalfi
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Asma Ghorbel
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Debuire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Norbert Aillères
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Roxana Draghici
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Mailys De Méric De Bellefon
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Charissoux
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Boisselier
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvain Demontoy
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Alexis Marguerit
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Morgane Cabaillé
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Cantaloube
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Aïcha Keskes
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Touria Bouhafa
- CHU Hassan II, Radiotherapy and Brachyterapy, 30050 Fez, Morocco
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy-Jacquet
- Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, CHU Carémeau, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bordeau K, Michalet M, Keskes A, Valdenaire S, Debuire P, Cantaloube M, Cabaillé M, Portales F, Draghici R, Ychou M, Assenat E, Mazard T, Samalin E, Gauthier L, Colombo PE, Carrere S, Souche FR, Aillères N, Fenoglietto P, Azria D, Riou O. Stereotactic MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Tumors: Updated Results of the Montpellier Prospective Registry Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010007. [PMID: 36612004 PMCID: PMC9817834 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive RadioTherapy (SMART) is a novel process to treat pancreatic tumors. We present an update of the data from our prospective registry of SMART for pancreatic tumors. Materials and methods: After the establishment of the SMART indication in a multidisciplinary board, we included all patients treated for pancreatic tumors. Primary endpoints were acute and late toxicities. Secondary endpoints were survival outcomes (local control, overall survival, distant metastasis free survival) and dosimetric advantages of adaptive process on targets volumes and OAR. Results: We included seventy consecutive patients in our cohort between October 2019 and April 2022. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 5 consecutive fractions. No severe acute SMART related toxicity was noted. Acute and late Grade ≤ 2 gastro intestinal were low. Daily adaptation significantly improved PTV and GTV coverage as well as OAR sparing. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months since SMART completion, the median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS were 20.9 months, 86.7% (95% CI: (75−93%), and 68.6% (95% CI: (53−80%), respectively, from SMART completion. Local control at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were, respectively, 96.8 % (95% CI: 88−99%), 86.5 (95% CI: 68−95%), and 80.7% (95% CI: 59−92%). There was no grade > 2 late toxicities. Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers (LAPC) and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers (BRPC) patients (52 patients) had a median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS from SMART completion of 15.2 months, 84.4% (95% CI: (70−92%)), and 60.5% (95% CI: (42−75%)), respectively. The median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from initiation of induction chemotherapy were 22.3 months, 91% (95% CI: (78−97%)), and 45.8% (95% CI: (27−63%)), respectively. Twenty patients underwent surgical resection (38.7 % of patients with initially LAPC) with negative margins (R0). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of SMART for pancreatic tumors. The treatment was well tolerated with only low-grade toxicities. Long-term OS and LC rates were achieved. SMART achieved high secondary resection rates in LAPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Bordeau
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Morgan Michalet
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Aïcha Keskes
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Valdenaire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Debuire
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Cantaloube
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Morgane Cabaillé
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Roxana Draghici
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Assenat
- Medical Oncology Department, CHU St. Eloi, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Ludovic Gauthier
- Biometrics Unit, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- Digestive Surgery Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Sebastien Carrere
- Digestive Surgery Department, ICM, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Norbert Aillères
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pascal Fenoglietto
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - David Azria
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Riou
- Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University Federation of Radiation Oncology of Mediterranean Occitanie, University Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, 34298 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Weykamp F, Katsigiannopulos E, Piskorski L, Regnery S, Hoegen P, Ristau J, Renkamp CK, Liermann J, Forster T, Lang K, König L, Rippke C, Buchele C, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246041. [PMID: 36551527 PMCID: PMC9775484 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: To assess dosimetry benefits of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) of liver metastases. (2) Methods: This is a subgroup analysis of an ongoing prospective registry including patients with liver metastases. Patients were treated at the MRIdian Linac between February 2020 and April 2022. The baseline plan was recalculated based on the updated anatomy of the day to generate the predicted plan. This predicted plan could then be re-optimized to create an adapted plan. (3) Results: Twenty-three patients received 30 SMART treatment series of in total 36 liver metastases. Most common primary tumors were colorectal- and pancreatic carcinoma (26.1% respectively). Most frequent fractionation scheme (46.6%) was 50 Gy in five fractions. The adapted plan was significantly superior compared to the predicted plan in regard to planning-target-volume (PTV) coverage, PTV overdosing, and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints violations (91.5 vs. 38.0%, 6 vs. 19% and 0.6 vs. 10.0%; each p < 0.001). Plan adaptation significantly increased median BEDD95 by 3.2 Gy (p < 0.001). Mean total duration of SMART was 72.4 min. (4) Conclusions: SMART offers individualized ablative irradiation of liver metastases tailored to the daily anatomy with significant superior tumor coverage and improved sparing of OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Efthimios Katsigiannopulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Piskorski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evolution of Radiation Therapy in Pancreas Cancer Management toward MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185380. [PMID: 36143027 PMCID: PMC9500969 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreas cancer has a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment and is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. At diagnosis, most patients have either metastatic or locally advanced disease. In this article, we review the evolution of treatments in locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) and discuss the various radiation therapy fractionation schemes. Furthermore, we examine the data supporting dose escalation and the delivery of ablative biologically effective doses in the setting of LAPC. Finally, we review the role of MRI-guided radiation therapy in escalating dose while sparing organs at risk in the era of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Michalet M, Riou O, Azria D, Decoene C, Crop F. News in magnetic resonance imaging use for radiation oncology. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:784-788. [PMID: 36031496 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to give a summary of the progress of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy. MRI is an important imaging modality for treatment planning in radiotherapy. However, the registration step with the simulation scanner can be a source of errors, motivating the implementation of all-MRI simulation methods and new accelerators coupled with on-board MRI. First, practical MRI imaging for radiotherapy is detailed, but also the importance of a coherent imaging workflow incorporating all imaging modalities. Second, future evolutions and research domains such as quantitative imaging biomarkers, MRI-only pseudo computed tomography and radiomics are discussed. Finally, the application of MRI during radiotherapy treatment is reviewed: the use of MR-linear accelerators. MRI is increasingly integrated into radiotherapy. Advances in diagnostic imaging can thus benefit radiotherapy, but specific radiotherapy constraints lead to additional challenges and require close collaboration between radiologists, radiation oncologists, technologists and physicists. The integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in the radiotherapy process will result in mutual benefit for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy. MRI-guided radiotherapy has already been used for several years in clinical routine. Abdominopelvic neoplasias (pancreas, liver, prostate) are the preferred locations for treatment because of their favourable contrast in MRI, their movement during irradiation and their proximity to organs at risk of radiation exposure, making the tracking and daily adaptation of the plan essential. MRI has emerged as an increasingly necessary imaging modality for radiotherapy planning. Inclusion of patients in clinical trials evaluating new MRI-guided radiotherapy techniques and associated quantitative imaging biomarkers will be necessary to assess the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Michalet
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France.
| | - O Riou
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - D Azria
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, Fédération universitaire d'oncologie-radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée (Forom), Inserm U1194 IRCM, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - C Decoene
- Medical physics, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - F Crop
- Medical physics, centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue Frédéric-Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nenoff L, Buti G, Bobić M, Lalonde A, Nesteruk KP, Winey B, Sharp GC, Sudhyadhom A, Paganetti H. Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163926. [PMID: 36010919 PMCID: PMC9406068 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, adaptive strategies require time- and resource-intensive manual structure corrections. This study compares different strategies: optimization without manual structure correction, adaptation with physician-drawn structures, and no adaptation. Strategies were compared for 16 patients with pancreas, liver, and head and neck (HN) cancer with 1-5 repeated images during treatment: 'reference adaptation', with structures drawn by a physician; 'single-DIR adaptation', using a single set of deformably propagated structures; 'multi-DIR adaptation', using robust planning with multiple deformed structure sets; 'conservative adaptation', using the intersection and union of all deformed structures; 'probabilistic adaptation', using the probability of a voxel belonging to the structure in the optimization weight; and 'no adaptation'. Plans were evaluated using reference structures and compared using a scoring system. The reference adaptation with physician-drawn structures performed best, and no adaptation performed the worst. For pancreas and liver patients, adaptation with a single DIR improved the plan quality over no adaptation. For HN patients, integrating structure uncertainties brought an additional benefit. If resources for manual structure corrections would prevent online adaptation, manual correction could be replaced by a fast 'plausibility check', and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. Including structure uncertainties in the optimization has the potential to make online adaptation more automatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Gregory Buti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mislav Bobić
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arthur Lalonde
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Konrad P. Nesteruk
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian Winey
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gregory Charles Sharp
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|