WSES classification and guidelines for liver trauma

Evolution in liver trauma management: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Liver trauma is common and can be treated non-operatively, through radiological embolisation, or surgically. Non-operative management (NOM) is preferred when possible, but specific criteria remain unclear. This retrospective study at a level I trauma centre assessed the evolution and outcomes of liver injury management over more than 20 years.

METHODS

Data from January 1996 to June 2020 were analysed for liver trauma cases. Variables were evaluated, including the type of injury, diagnostic modalities, liver injury grade, transfer from other hospitals, treatment type, and length of hospital stay. Outcomes were assessed using soft (hospitalisation time and intensive care unit stay) and hard (mortality) endpoints.

RESULTS

In total 406 patients were analysed, of which 375 (92.4%) had a blunt and 31 (7.6%) a penetrating liver trauma. Approximately one-third (31.2%) were hemodynamically unstable, although 78.8% had low-grade liver lesions. The initial treatment was non-operative in 72.9% of the patients (68.5% conservative, 4.4% interventional radiology). Blunt trauma was treated by surgery in 23.2% of the patients, while 74.2% in case of penetrating trauma. Overall mortality was 11.1% including death caused by associated lesions. The 24-h mortality was 5.7%. Indication for surgical treatment was determined by hemodynamic instability, high grade liver lesion, penetrating trauma, and associated lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the role of surgery in liver trauma management has strongly diminished over recent decades, hemodynamically unstable patients, high-grade lesions, penetrating trauma, and severe associated lesions are the main indications for surgery. In other situations, NOM by full conservative therapy or radiological embolisation seems effective.

Role of laparoscopic surgery in managing hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients: a single level I trauma center, propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopy in the treatment and diagnosis of penetrating thoraco-abdominal injury has been established. However, there is no clear consensus on the role of laparoscopy in blunt injury due to numerous reasons, such as concerns of missed injury and technical problems in treating various abdominal organs. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of laparoscopy and evaluate its safety in managing blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.

METHODS

The medical records and Korean Trauma Data Base (KTDB) of patients who underwent abdominal surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 at a single level I center were collected. Patients were classified into a laparoscopy group and a laparotomy group. The laparoscopy groups were matched 1:1 with the laparotomy group by using propensity score matching (PSM). Patient demographics, injured organ and its grade, operative procedure, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 128 patients were included. There was no significant imbalance in demographics between the two groups except sex. Injured organ and its grade showed no significant differences between the two groups except for the incidence of omentum. Small bowel and mesenteric repair were performed most often in both groups. Splenectomy, pancreatic surgery, duodenectomy, and liver resection were performed exclusively in the laparotomy group. Severe postoperative complication rate (3% vs. 20%: p = 0.004), length of stay in ICU (3.3 ± 3.2 days vs. 4.6 ± 3.7; p = 0.046), and operation time (93.9 ± 47.7 min vs. 112.8 ± 57.7; p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. The conversion rate was about 16%. There was no missed injury.

CONCLUSIONS

In hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients who sustained penetrating or blunt injury, laparoscopy is feasible and safe as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in selected cohort of abdominal trauma.

Specialized educational program for high-grade liver injury management: a three-dimensional printed model approach

PURPOSE

The study aims to present a specialized educational program using a 3D printed model for managing Grade IV and V liver injuries. Hepatic packing, a common technique, may not always achieve sufficient hemostasis in these cases, warranting alternative solutions such as mesh liver wrapping. However, mastering this procedure is challenging due to limited teaching resources and the need for repeated practice.

METHODS

A computer-based model was created from an abdominal CT scan to produce a real-sized injured liver model using thermoplastic elastomer TPU-95. Trainees received systematic instruction from an instructor, allowing them to perform the procedure under supervision and independently.

RESULTS

Eight surgical residents at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center participated in the program, with the majority successfully completing the procedure under supervision. Furthermore, trainees demonstrated reduced procedure times when performing independently, indicating improved proficiency.

CONCLUSION

This educational approach offers a simple and repeatable method for continuous training in managing high-grade liver injuries, holding potential for enhanced patient outcomes.

Selective nonoperative versus operative management of liver gunshot injuries: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Experience accumulated over the last decades suggests nonoperative management (NOM) of civilian gunshot liver injuries can be safely applied in selected cases. This study aims to compare the outcomes of selective NOM versus operative management (OM) of patients sustaining gunshot wounds (GSW) to the liver.

METHODS

A registry-based retrospective cohort analysis was performed for the period of 2008 to 2016 in a Brazilian trauma referral. Patients aged 16-80 years sustaining civilian GSW to right-sided abdominal quadrants and liver injury were included. Baseline data, vital signs, grade of liver injury, associated injuries, injury severity scores, blood transfusion requirements, liver- and non-liver-related complications, length-of-stay (LOS), and mortality were retrieved from individual registries.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 37 underwent NOM and 17 underwent OM. The median age was 25 years and all were male. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding patients' demographics, injury scores, grade of liver injury and associated lesions. NOM patients tended to sustain higher-grade injuries (86.5% vs 64.7%; p = 0.08), and failure of conservative management was recorded in two (5.4%) cases. The rate of complications was 48% with no between-group statistically significant difference. Blood transfusion requirements were significantly higher in the OM group (58.8% vs 21.6%; p = 0.012). The median LOS was seven days. No deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Patients with liver GSW who are haemodynamically stable and without peritonitis are candidates for NOM. In this study, NOM was safe and effective even in high-grade injuries.

Delayed versus early hepatic resection among patients with severe traumatic liver injuries undergoing damage control laparotomy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the effect of time to hepatic resection on the outcomes of patients with high-grade liver injuries who underwent damage control laparotomy (DCL).

METHODS

This is a 4-year (2017-2020) analysis of the ACS-TQIP. Adult trauma patients with severe liver injuries (AAST-OIS grade ​≥ ​III) who underwent DCL and hepatic resection were included. We excluded patients with early mortality (<24 ​h). Patients were stratified into those who received hepatic resection within the initial operation (Early) and take-back operation (Delayed).

RESULTS

Of 914 patients identified, 29% had a delayed hepatic resection. On multivariable regression analyses, although delayed resection was not associated with mortality (aOR:1.060,95%CI[0.57-1.97],p ​= ​0.854), it was associated with higher complications (aOR:1.842,95%CI[1.38-2.46],p ​< ​0.001), and longer hospital (β: +0.129, 95%CI[0.04-0.22],p ​= ​0.005) and ICU (β:+0.198,95%CI[0.14-0.25],p ​< ​0.001) LOS, compared to the early resection.

CONCLUSION

Delayed hepatic resection was associated with higher adjusted odds of major complications and longer hospital and ICU LOS, however, no difference in mortality, compared to early resection.

Construction and validation of a novel and severe hepatic injury model in swine focuses on research and training. Observational study

Some hepatic wound models have been developed in pigs with the aim of reproducing liver injury; however, the wound shape, severity, and outcome differ among them. The novel injury profile employed in this study differed from that used elsewhere for standardized, repeatable, reproducible, incising-penetrating, vascular, and severe injury in swine. It is made with a cutting object that penetrates deep into the hepatic parenchyma, always affecting the two suprahepatic veins at the point where they merge into the common trunk. The primary outcome was reproducibility and replicability of the surgical method. The secondary outcome was the analysis of some variables (blood loss, survival, and flow) to validate the model. •This novel method of liver injury provides a liver injury with the following characteristics: standardized, incise-penetrated, deep, bloody, and severe.•This model can be used for research (trauma, hepato-bilio-pancreatic, pharmaceutical) and training (damage control surgery).•Method name: Incising-Penetrating, Vascular and Severe Liver Injury Model in Swine.

Transarterial interventions in civilian gunshot wound injury: experience from a level-1 trauma center

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of trans-arterial vascular interventions in treatment of civilian gunshot wounds (GSW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a level-1 trauma center to include 46 consecutive adults admitted due to GSW related hemorrhage and treated with endovascular interventions from July 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and procedural metrics were retrieved. Primary outcomes of interest include technical success and in-hospital mortality. Factors of mortality were assessed using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were brought to the endovascular suite directly (endovascular group) from the trauma bay and 25 patients after treatment in the operating room (OR group). The OR group had higher hemodynamic instability (48.0% vs 19.0%, p = 0.040), lower hemoglobin (12.9 vs 10.1, p = 0.001) and platelet counts (235.2 vs 155.1, p = 0.003), and worse Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score (4.1 vs 10.2, p < 0.0001) at the time of initial presentation. Technical success was achieved in all 40 cases in which targeted embolization was attempted (100%). Empiric embolization was performed in 6/46 (13.0%) patients based on computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) and operative findings. Stent-grafts were placed in 3 patients for subclavian artery injuries. Availability of pre-intervention CTA was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time (19.8 ± 12.1 vs 30.7 ± 18.6 min, p = 0.030). A total of 41 patients were discharged in stable condition (89.1%). Hollow organ injury was associated with mortality (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular embolization and stenting were effective in managing hemorrhage due to GSW in a carefully selected population. Hollow organ injury was a statistically significant predictor of mortality. Pre-intervention CTA enabled targeted, shorter and equally effective procedures.

Endovascular embolization of persistent liver injuries not responding to conservative management: a narrative review

Trauma remains a significant healthcare burden, causing over five million yearly fatalities. Notably, the liver is a frequently injured solid organ in abdominal trauma, especially in patients under 40 years. It becomes even more critical given that uncontrolled hemorrhage linked to liver trauma can have mortality rates ranging from 10% to 50%. Liver injuries, mainly resulting from blunt trauma such as motor vehicle accidents, are traditionally classified using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading scale. However, recent developments have introduced the World Society of Emergency Surgery classification, which considers the patient's physiological status. The diagnostic approach often involves multiphase computed tomography (CT). Still, newer methods like split-bolus single-pass CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) aim to reduce radiation exposure. Concerning management, nonoperative strategies have emerged as the gold standard, especially for hemodynamically stable patients. Incorporating angiography with embolization has also been beneficial, with success rates reported between 80% and 97%. However, it is essential to identify the specific source of bleeding for effective embolization. Given the severity of liver trauma and its potential complications, innovations in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been pivotal. While CT remains a primary diagnostic tool, methods like CEUS offer safer alternatives. Moreover, nonoperative management, especially when combined with angiography and embolization, has demonstrated notable success. Still, the healthcare community must remain vigilant to complications and continuously seek improvements in trauma care.

Nonoperative management with angioembolization for blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature on associated outcomes of angioembolization in blunt abdominal solid organ traumas.

METHODS

The databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were explored until 24 September 2021. All studies with data on the efficacy or safety of angioembolization in patients suffering from hemodynamically unstable blunt abdominal solid organ trauma were included. The primary outcomes were clinical success rate and mortality. Pooled event rates were calculated using a double arcsine transformation to stabilize the variance of the original proportion.

RESULTS

In total, 13 reports of 12 studies were included in the systematic review. According to the current meta-analysis, the angioembolization for blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients had a high clinical success rate [0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.99)] and low mortality [0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.07)]. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the various injured solid organs for either of these parameters. In addition, the technique-associated adverse events were seldom and tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

For blunt abdominal solid organ trauma in hemodynamically unstable patients, this review shows that angioembolization exhibited a high clinical success rate, low mortality, and tolerable technique-related adverse events. Furthermore, the top possible indication for angioembolization in hemodynamically unstable patients is an individual who responds to rapid fluid resuscitation. However, high-quality and large-scale trials are needed to confirm these results and determine the selection criteria for appropriate patients in this setting.

Management of Adult Blunt Renal Injury: A 10-Year Retrospective Review at a Single Institution

Purpose: Renal injury occurs in up to 5% of trauma cases and the kidney is the third most wounded abdominal organ. The study objective was to analyze clinical characteristics of patients with blunt renal trauma and review the treatment of high-grade blunt renal injuries.Methods: The medical charts of trauma patients who visited Haeundae Paik Hospital between March 2010 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, injury patterns, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were analyzed.Results: A total of 68 patients with renal trauma were included in this study. The most common renal injury was Grade III (<i>n</i> = 27, 39.7%). Falling was the predominant mechanism of injury (<i>n</i> = 33, 48.5%), and 23.5% (<i>n</i> = 16) of patients sustained isolated renal trauma. Organ damage related to kidney injury included chest injury (57.4%, <i>n</i> = 39) and abdominal or pelvic content injury (48.5%, <i>n</i> = 33). The overall mortality rate was 2.9% (<i>n</i> = 2). There were 45 cases of high-grade renal trauma (AAST Kidney injury scale Grade Ш-V). There was no statistical difference in the outcomes of high-grade (<i>n</i> = 44, 97.8%) and low-grade (<i>n</i> = 23, 100%) renal trauma patients who received nonoperative treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.511). Variables did not differ significantly, except for the injury severity score which was statistically significantly different between low-grade and high-grade renal trauma patients (<i>p</i> = 0.001).Conclusion: Most patients with traumatic renal injury, even those with high-grade injury, can be managed by nonoperative treatment, and have a good prognosis.

Laparoscopic Approach to Severe Liver Injury in a Patient With Blunt Abdominal Trauma

With laparoscopic surgery becoming more popular in surgical practice, laparoscopic approaches in trauma patients have increased. Non-operative management is the standard treatment algorithm in patients with blunt abdominal trauma who are hemodynamically stable and have sustained a liver injury. However, laparoscopy is a safe and feasible method for exploration, irrigation, and treatment if a surgical intervention is needed in this group. In this study, we aimed to present a case of liver injury in blunt abdominal trauma and its management laparoscopically. A 22-year-old male was admitted to the Marmara University Hospital's Emergency Unit of a tertiary center following a truck accident. The patient was hemodynamically stable at admission. CT scan showed a grade IV liver laceration with hemoperitoneum. The patient was transferred to the observation room. After three hours, the patient's hemoglobin value decreased from 14.6 g/dl to 8.4 g/dl, and the mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 60 mmHg. The patient's heart rate increased to 125, and peritonitis was evident on the abdominal examination. Emergent laparoscopy was performed on the patient. Grade IV liver laceration with no active bleeding was observed. After peritoneal irrigation, surgery was terminated. With the developments in minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic approaches were used more frequently in trauma patients. In the referral and experienced centers, laparoscopy could be an appropriate way to avoid unnecessary laparotomies.

Predictors of need for endovascular intervention in hepatic trauma

PURPOSE

Non-operative management of hepatic trauma with adjunctive hepatic arterial embolization (HAE) is widely accepted. Despite careful patient selection utilizing CTA, a substantial proportion of angiograms are negative for arterial injury and no HAE is performed. This study aims to determine which CT imaging findings and clinical factors are associated with the presence of active extravasation on subsequent angiography in patients with hepatic trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of 243 adults who presented with abdominal trauma and underwent abdominal CTA followed by conventional angiography were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 49 had hepatic injuries on CTA. Hepatic injuries were graded using the American association for the surgery of trauma (AAST) CT classification, and CT images were assessed for active contrast extravasation, arterial pseudoaneurysm, sentinel clot, hemoperitoneum, laceration in-volving more than 2 segments, and laceration involving specific anatomic landmarks (porta hepatis, hepatic veins, and gallbladder fossa). Medical records were reviewed for pre- and post-angiography blood pressures, hemoglobin levels, and transfusion requirements. Angiographic images and reports were reviewed for hepatic arterial injury and performance of HAE.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, AAST hepatic injury grade was significantly associated with increased odds of HAE (Odds ratio: 2.5, 95% CI 1.1, 7.1, p = 0.049). Univariate analyses demonstrated no significant association between CT liver injury grade, CT characteristics of liver injury, or pre-angiographic clinical data with need for HAE.

CONCLUSION

In patients with hepatic trauma, prediction of need for HAE based on CT findings alone is challenging; such patients require consideration of both clinical factors and imaging findings.

Pediatric trauma and emergency surgery: an international cross-sectional survey among WSES members

BACKGROUND

In contrast to adults, the situation for pediatric trauma care from an international point of view and the global management of severely injured children remain rather unclear. The current study investigates structural management of pediatric trauma in centers of different trauma levels as well as experiences with pediatric trauma management around the world.

METHODS

A web-survey had been distributed to the global mailing list of the World Society of Emergency Surgery from 10/2021-03/2022, investigating characteristics of respondents and affiliated hospitals, case-load of pediatric trauma patients, capacities and infrastructure for critical care in children, trauma team composition, clinical work-up and individual experiences with pediatric trauma management in response to patients´ age. The collaboration group was subdivided regarding sizes of affiliated hospitals to allow comparisons concerning hospital volumes. Comparable results were conducted to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 133 participants from 34 countries, i.e. 5 continents responded to the survey. They were most commonly affiliated with larger hospitals (> 500 beds in 72.9%) and with level I or II trauma centers (82.0%), respectively. 74.4% of hospitals offer unrestricted pediatric medical care, but only 63.2% and 42.9% of the participants had sufficient experiences with trauma care in children ≤ 10 and ≤ 5 years of age (p = 0.0014). This situation is aggravated in participants from smaller hospitals (p < 0.01). With regard to hospital size (≤ 500 versus > 500 in-hospital beds), larger hospitals were more likely affiliated with advanced trauma centers, more elaborated pediatric intensive care infrastructure (p < 0.0001), treated children at all ages more frequently (p = 0.0938) and have higher case-loads of severely injured children < 12 years of age (p = 0.0009). Therefore, the majority of larger hospitals reserve either pediatric surgery departments or board-certified pediatric surgeons (p < 0.0001) and in-hospital trauma management is conducted more multi-disciplinarily. However, the majority of respondents does not feel prepared for treatment of severe pediatric trauma and call for special educational and practical training courses (overall: 80.2% and 64.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-professional management of pediatric trauma and individual experiences with severely injured children depend on volumes, level of trauma centers and infrastructure of the hospital. However, respondents from hospitals at all levels of trauma care complain about an alarming lack of knowledge on pediatric trauma management.

Primary angioembolization in liver trauma: major hepatic necrosis as a severe complication of a minimally invasive treatment-a narrative review

The liver is the second most commonly solid organ injured in blunt abdominal trauma. Liver injuries are classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Injury Scale. The choice of Non-Operative Management is based on generalized clinical patients’ conditions combined with the evidence on CT scan imaging. To date, there are no consensus guidelines on appropriate patient selection criteria for those who would benefit from angiography and angioembolization. Major hepatic necrosis is a clinical condition of extended liver damage and is the most common complication after angioembolization. Large amounts of necrotic liver require therapy, but it is unclear if the better technique is debridements supplemented by percutaneous drainage procedures or definitive resection. A systematic review of the literature was performed with a computerized search in a database such as Medline for published papers on the use of angioembolization in trauma patients with hepatic injuries and on the most common complication, the major hepatic necrosis. The systematic review was conducted according to the recommendations of the 2020 updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 3643 patients were included in the study, suffering liver trauma and 1703 (47%) were treated with Non-Operative Management; angioembolization was performed 10% of cases with a variable rate between 2 and 20%. Patients developed different complications. Hepatic necrosis accounted for 16% ranging from 0 to 42%. 74% of patients underwent operative management with a mortality rate of 11%. High-grade liver injuries pose significant challenges to surgeons who care for trauma patients. Many patients can be successfully managed nonoperatively. In hemodynamically stable patients with arterial blush, without other lesions requiring immediate surgery, selective and super-selective AE of the hepatic artery branches is an effective technique. However, these therapies are not without complications and major hepatic necrosis is the most common complication in high-grade injures. Level III, Systematic review

Relationship between in‐hospital mortality and abdominal angiography among patients with blunt liver injuries: a propensity score‐matching from a nationwide trauma registry of Japan

Aim

To assess relationships between abdominal angiography and outcomes in adults with blunt liver injuries.

Methods

A retrospective observational study carried out from January 2004 to December 2018. Adult blunt‐trauma patients with AAST grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ were analyzed with in‐hospital mortality as the primary outcome using propensity‐score‐(PS) matching to seek associations with abdominal angiography findings.

Results

A total of 1,821 patients were included, of which 854 had available abdominal angiography data (AA+) and 967 did not (AA−). From these, 562 patients were selected from each group by propensity score matching. In‐hospital mortality was found to be lower in the AA+ than in the AA− group (15.1% [87/562] versus 25.4% [143/562]; odds ratio 0.544, 95% confidence interval 0.398–0.739).

Conclusion

Abdominal angiography is shown to be of benefit for adult patients with blunt liver injury in terms of their lower in‐hospital mortality.

A novel inflatable device for perihepatic packing and hepatic hemorrhage control: A proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled bleeding is the primary cause of death in complex liver trauma and perihepatic packing is regularly utilized for hemorrhage control. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a novel inflatable device (the airbag) for perihepatic packing using a validated liver injury damage control model in swine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The image of the human liver was digitally isolated within an abdominal computerized tomography scan to produce a silicone model of the liver to mold the airbag. Two medical grade polyurethane sheets were thermal bonded to the configuration of the liver avoiding compression of the hepatic pedicle, hepatic veins, and the suprahepatic vena cava after inflation. Yorkshire pigs (n = 22) underwent controlled hemorrhagic shock (35% of the total blood volume), hypothermia, and fluid resuscitation to reproduce the indications for damage control surgery (coagulopathy, hypothermia, and acidosis) prior to a liver injury. A 3 × 10 cm rectangular segment of the left middle lobe of the liver was removed to create the injury. Subsequently, the animals were randomized into 4 groups for liver damage control (240 min), Sponge Pack (n = 6), Pressurized Airbag (n = 6), Vacuum Airbag (n = 6), and Uncontrolled (n = 4). Animals were monitored throughout the experiment and blood samples obtained.

RESULTS

Perihepatic packing with the pressurized airbag led to significantly higher mean arterial pressure during the liver damage control phase compared to sponge pack and vacuum airbag 52 mmHg (SD 2.3), 44.9 mmHg (SD 2.1), and 32 mmHg (SD 2.3), respectively (p < 0.0001), ejection fraction was also higher in that group. Hepatic hemorrhage was significantly lower in the pressurized airbag group compared to sponge pack, vacuum airbag, and uncontrolled groups; respectively 225 ml (SD 160), 611 ml (SD 123), 991 ml (SD 385), 1162 ml (SD 137) (p < 0001). Rebleeding after perihepatic packing removal was also significantly lower in the pressurized airbag group; respectively 32 ml (SD 47), 630 ml (SD 185), 513 ml (SD 303), (p = 0.0004). Intra-abdominal pressure remained similar to baseline, 1.9 mmHg (SD 1), (p = 0.297). Histopathology showed less necrosis at the border of the liver injury site with the pressurized airbag.

CONCLUSION

The pressurized airbag was significantly more effective at controlling hepatic hemorrhage and improving hemodynamics than the traditional sponge pack technique. Rebleeding after perihepatic packing removal was negligible with the pressurized airbag and it did not provoke hepatic injury.

Burden and Transmission Risks of Viral Hepatitis in Southern Ethiopia: Evidence Needed for Prevention and Control Measures

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are significant causes of liver-associated morbidity and mortality for millions of people globally. Ethiopia is one of the viral hepatitis-endemic countries with no national strategy for surveillance and limited data. As such, this study aimed to investigated the extent and associated risk factors of HBV and HCV among community members in southern Ethiopia.

METHODS

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2020 to August 2020. A structured questionnaire was used to collect behavioral and sociodemographic data. Serum samples were collected and assayed for seromarkers of HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs) and HCV (anti-HCV) using ELISAs. In HBsAg-positive samples, HBV DNA was further quantified using RT-PCR. Data were entered into EpiData 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS 21.0. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were employed.

RESULTS

The study included 693 participants. Seromarkers for HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs were found to be 9.5%, 1.4%, 31.1%, and 14.3%, respectively. In 66 HBsAg positives, 57 (86.4%) had quantifiable HBV DNA. Prevalence of current HBV infection (HBsAg+, anti-HBc+, anti-HBs-) and lifetime exposure (positive for either HBsAg or anti-HBc) to HBV were 8.7% and 31.9%, respectively, and 63.1% of participants were vulnerable or had no evidence of prior HBV infection (HBsAg-, anti-HBc-, anti-HBs-). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, multiple sexual contacts, family history of hepatitis infection, alcohol consumption, and khat chewing were significantly associated with HBV. The seroprevalence of HBV was relatively high in this study area.

CONCLUSION

This study showed high prevalence of HBV infection, but low prevalence of HCV. This indicates that HBV is a major health problem in this community. Population-based surveillance, care, and treatment, as well as behavioral change and education programs, should be enhanced to minimize risk exposure.

Simulation, In Vitro, and In Vivo Cytotoxicity Assessments of Methotrexate-Loaded pH-Responsive Nanocarriers

In this study, pH-responsive niosomal methotrexate (MTX) modified with ergosterol was prepared for potential anticancer application. The prepared formulation had a size of 176.7 ± 3.4 nm, zeta potential of −31.5 ± 2.6 mV, EE% of 76.9 ± 2.5%, and a pH-responsive behavior in two different pHs (5.4 and 7.4). In-silico evaluations showed that MTX intended to make a strong hydrogen bond with Span 60 compartments involving N2 and O4 atoms in glutamic acid and N7 atom in pteridine ring moieties, respectively. The cytotoxic effects of free and pH-MTX/Nio were assessed against MCF7 and HUVECs. Compared with free MTX, we found significantly lower IC50s when MCF7 cells were treated with niosomal MTX (84.03 vs. 9.464 µg/mL after 48 h, respectively). Moreover, lower cell killing activity was observed for this formulation in normal cells. The pH-MTX/Nio exhibited a set of morphological changes in MCF7 cells observed during cell death. In-vivo results demonstrated that intraperitoneal administration of free MTX (2 mg/kg) after six weeks caused a significant increase in serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, and serum malondialdehyde (MDA) levels of rats compared to the normal control rats. Treatment with 2 and 4 mg/kg doses of pH-MTX/Nio significantly increased serum BUN, serum creatinine, and serum lipid peroxidation. Still, the safety profile of such formulations in healthy cells/tissues should be further investigated.

Added value of deep learning-based liver parenchymal CT volumetry for predicting major arterial injury after blunt hepatic trauma: a decision tree analysis

PURPOSE

In patients presenting with blunt hepatic injury (BHI), the utility of CT for triage to hepatic angiography remains uncertain since simple binary assessment of contrast extravasation (CE) as being present or absent has only modest accuracy for major arterial injury on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) liver injury grading is coarse and subjective, with limited diagnostic utility in this setting. Volumetric measurements of hepatic injury burden could improve prediction. We hypothesized that in a cohort of patients that underwent catheter-directed hepatic angiography following admission trauma CT, a deep learning quantitative visualization method that calculates % liver parenchymal disruption (the LPD index, or LPDI) would add value to CE assessment for prediction of major hepatic arterial injury (MHAI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients with BHI between 1/1/2008 and 5/1/2017 from two institutions that underwent admission trauma CT prior to hepatic angiography (n = 73). Presence (n = 41) or absence (n = 32) of MHAI (pseudoaneurysm, AVF, or active contrast extravasation on DSA) served as the outcome. Voxelwise measurements of liver laceration were derived using an existing multiscale deep learning algorithm trained on manually labeled data using cross-validation with a 75-25% split in four unseen folds. Liver volume was derived using a pre-trained whole liver segmentation algorithm. LPDI was automatically calculated for each patient by determining the percentage of liver involved by laceration. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed using a combination of automated LPDI measurements and either manually segmented CE volumes, or CE as a binary sign. Performance metrics for the decision rules were compared for significant differences with binary CE alone (the current standard of care for predicting MHAI), and the AAST grade.

RESULTS

36% of patients (n = 26) had contrast extravasation on CT. Median [Q1-Q3] automated LPDI was 4.0% [1.0-12.1%]. 41/73 (56%) of patients had MHAI. A decision tree based on auto-LPDI and volumetric CE measurements (CEvol) had the highest accuracy (0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.91) with significant improvement over binary CE assessment (0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.79; p = 0.01). AAST grades at different cut-offs performed poorly for predicting MHAI, with accuracies ranging from 0.44-0.63. Decision tree analysis suggests an auto-LPDI cut-off of ≥ 12% for minimizing false negative CT exams when CE is absent or diminutive.

CONCLUSION

Current CT imaging paradigms are coarse, subjective, and limited for predicting which BHIs are most likely to benefit from AE. LPDI, automated using deep learning methods, may improve objective personalized triage of BHI patients to angiography at the point of care.

Embolization versus Surgery for Stabilized Patients with Solid Organ Injury

PURPOSE

To compare embolization with laparotomy for the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with solid organ injury who responded to initial resuscitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from a Japanese nationwide trauma registry were analyzed. Included were hemodynamically unstable patients (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and blood transfusion within the first 24 hours) whose initial computed tomography assessment confirmed the presence of solid organ injuries (liver and/or spleen). A total of 224 patients were included (median age: 53 years, interquartile range: 32-69; 73.3% male; liver injury = 131 [58%] and spleen injury = 98 [44%]; median organ injury scale: 3, interquartile range: 3-4; median injury severity score: 19, interquartile range: 16-25). Patients who underwent embolization were compared with those who underwent laparotomy. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The data were evaluated using a propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

Laparotomy and embolization were performed in 133 (59.1%) and 91 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Of those, 111 (84%) and 84 (92%) patients achieved in-hospital survival after laparotomy and embolization, respectively. No significant difference in in-hospital survival (P = .053) was noted. The propensity score matching model did not reveal a significant difference in in-hospital survival (P = .276).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was observed between embolization and laparotomy in terms of in-hospital survival among unstable patients who responded to initial resuscitation with solid organ injury.

Traumatic damage to the liver capsule: an unusual cause of small bowel obstruction

A 61-year-old man presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. Three months prior to presentation, he had sustained blunt trauma to his right side while cycling, but had not sought medical attention. On admission, a CT scan showed small bowel obstruction (SBO) and he underwent an emergency open laparotomy. Intraoperatively, a subcapsular liver haematoma was identified, with incarcerated, necrotic small bowel within the liver capsule. The patient underwent deroofing of the haematoma with an omental patch and a small bowel resection with primary anastomosis. We believe this is the first reported case of SBO secondary to small bowel herniation into the liver capsule following trauma.

Application of Damage Control Tactics and Transpapillary Biliary Decompression for Organ-Preserving Surgical Management of Liver Injury in Combat Patient

The combat penetrating gunshot injury is frequently associated with damage to the liver. Bile leak and external biliary fistula (EBF) are common complications. Biliary decompression is commonly applied for the management of EBF. Also, little is known about the features of combat trauma and its management in ongoing hybrid warfare in East Ukraine. A 23-year-old male was diagnosed with thoracoabdominal penetrating gunshot wound (GSW) by a high-energy multiple metal projectile. Damage control tactics were applied at all four levels of military medical care. Biliary decompression was achieved by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and the placement of biliary stents. Occlusion of the stent was treated by stent replacement, and scheduled ERCP was performed. Partial EBF was diagnosed from the main wound defect of the liver and closed without surgical interventions on the 34th day after the injury. A combination of operative and nonoperative techniques for the management of the combat GSW to the liver is effective along with the application of damage control tactics. A scheduled ERCP application is an effective approach for the management of EBF, and liver resection could be avoided. A successful biliary decompression was achieved by the transpapillary intervention with the installation of stents. Stent occlusion could be diagnosed in the early post-traumatic period, which is effectively managed by scheduled ERCP as well as stent replacement with a large diameter as close as possible to the place of bile leak.

Bioinformatic and biochemical studies of formononetin against liver injure

Formononetin is a promising bioactive phytoestrogen with evident pharmacological properties. However, the potential hepatoprotective benefit is evidenced limitedly in experiments. This study was designed to investigate the hepatoprotective mechanism and benefit of formononetin against liver injury via network pharmacology combined with biochemical determination. The computational data from network pharmacology identified the crucial genes of formononetin against liver injury, listed as TNF-α, NFκB-p65, TLR3, RELA, TRAF6, IKBKG, IKBKB, TNFRSF1A. And the anti-liver injury of formononetin were mainly involved in suppression of inflammatory pathways, including TNF signaling pathway, NF-κB signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. In animal investigation, formononetin-dosed mice showed reduced body weight loss and hepatomegaly, meliorated liver function, suppressed hepatotoxicity and inflammatory reaction. Furthermore, the down-regulated expressions of TNF-α, NFκB-p65, TLR3 mRNAs and proteins in the livers of formononetin-dosed mice were detected accordingly. Therefore, we concluded that computational findings based on network pharmacology reveal the pharmacological targets, biological processes, and molecular mechanisms of formononetin against liver injury before some of findings were partially certified in vivo. Overall, formononetin may be a potential active component to prevent or treat liver injury.

Recommended Essential Equipment for Basic Life Support and Advanced Life Support Ground Ambulances 2020: A Joint Position Statement

In continued support of establishing and maintaining a foundation for standards of care, our organizations remain committed to periodic review and revision of this position statement. This latest revision was created based on a structured review of the National Model EMS Clinical Guidelines Version 2.2 in order to identify the equipment items necessary to deliver the care defined by those guidelines. In addition, in order to ensure congruity with national definitions of provider scope of practice, the list is differentiated into BLS and ALS levels of service utilizing the National Scope of Practice-defined levels of Emergency Medical Responder (EMR) and Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) as BLS, and Advanced EMT (AEMT) and Paramedic as ALS. Equipment items listed within each category were cross-checked against recommended scopes of practice for each level in order to ensure they were appropriately dichotomized to BLS or ALS levels of care. Some items may be considered optional at the local level as determined by agency-defined scope of practice and applicable clinical guidelines. In addition to the items included in this position statement our organizations agree that all EMS service programs should carry equipment and supplies in quantities as determined by the medical director and appropriate to the agency's level of care and available certified EMS personnel and as established in the agency's approved protocols.

Accident-related hepatic trauma in a medical clinical center in eastern China: a cross-sectional study

Background

The treatment of hepatic injury can be complex. Medical clinical centers are often the first line hospitals for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic trauma in China. The aim of the study is to summarize the experience in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic trauma in one medical clinical center in China.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with hepatic trauma admitted between January 2002 and December 2019 at the Xishan People’s Hospital of Wuxi. The outcomes were cure rate and death within 14 days post-discharge.

Results

Among the 318 patients with hepatic trauma, 146 patients underwent surgical treatment, and 172 received conservative treatment; three patients were transferred to other hospitals for further treatment; 283 patients were cured, and 35 died. Severe hepatic trauma occurred in 74 patients, with a mortality rate of 31.1% and accounting for 65.7% of total mortality. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading ≥ III (OR = 3.51, 95%CI: 1.32–9.37, P = 0.012) and multiple organ injury (OR = 7.51, 95%CI: 2.51–22.46, P < 0.001) were independently associated with death. Among patients with AAST grading ≥ III, surgery was an independent protective factor for death (OR = 0.08, 95%CI: 0.01–0.45, P = 0.004). Among patients with ASST ≥ III and who underwent surgery, age (OR = 5.29, 95%CI: 1.37–20.33, P = 0.015) and peri-hepatic packing (PHP) (OR = 5.54, 95%CI: 1.43–21.487, P = 0.013) were independently associated with death.

Conclusions

AAST grading ≥ III and multiple organ injury were independently associated with death. Among patients with AAST grading ≥ III, surgery was an independent protective factor for death. Among patients with ASST ≥ III and who underwent surgery, age and PHP were independently associated with death.

Definitive Repair of Injuries to the Liver During Initial Trauma Laparotomy

INTRODUCTION

Numerous surgical approaches and hemostatic techniques are used and have been described when operating on the traumatized liver. Despite a substantial decline in operative liver trauma, there still remains a debate on the optimal surgical approach, and goals, during the initial trauma laparotomy. Hepatic resection during the first operation, including the damage control settings, is advocated and practiced in only a select few institutions and remains highly controversial. Here, we describe our success with hepatic resection, repair, and/or hepatic vascular repair, during the trauma laparotomy with our emphasis on the collaboration between the trauma and hepatobiliary surgical teams.

CASE SERIES

From 207 patients with liver injuries during the study period, 7 patients had definitive liver resection or repair during the initial trauma laparotomy. One had hepatic tissue repair, 1 had hepatic vein repair, and 5 had liver resections. All the operations involved a hepatobiliary surgeon together with the trauma team. There were no fatalities in the liver operation group, no sepsis, or need for emergent angiography because of hemorrhage. Four patients needed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stenting because of biliary leak. Three patients were discharged home and 4 to rehabilitation.

DISCUSSION

Hepatic resection, and/or definitive hepatic repair, may be safe and beneficial to the patients during the initial operation even in a damage control setting when the patients' overall condition allows. We emphasize the benefit of collaboration with experienced and trained liver surgery, especially in lower volume trauma centers. ERCP is commonly needed for postoperative biliary leak and should be readily utilized.

Blunt liver trauma: effectiveness and evolution of non-operative management (NOM) in 145 consecutive cases

In recent decades, haemodynamically stable patients with traumatic liver injuries have been managed conservatively. The primary aim of this study is to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of the authors' approach to blunt hepatic trauma according to the degree of injury. The secondary aim is to analyse the changes in the decision-making process for blunt liver trauma management over the last 10 years. A total of 145 patients with blunt liver trauma managed by one trauma team were included in the study. Causes, sites and grades of injury, clinical conditions, ultrasonography and CT results, associated injuries, laboratory data, types of treatment (surgical or non-operative management/NOM), blood transfusions, complications, and lengths of hospitalization were recorded and analysed. A total of 85.5% of patients had extrahepatic injuries. The most frequently involved liver segments were VII (50.3%), VI (48.3%) and V (40.7%). The most common injury was grade III OIS (40.6%). Fifty-nine patients (40.7%) were treated surgically, with complications in 23.7% of patients, whereas 86 patients (59.3%) underwent NOM, with a complication rate of only 10.5%. The evolution over the last 10 years showed an overall increase in the NOM rate. This clinical experience confirmed that NOM was the most appropriate therapeutic choice for blunt liver trauma even in high-grade injuries and resulted in a 100% effectiveness rate with a 0% rate of conversion to surgical treatment. The relevant increase in the use of NOM did not influence the effectiveness or safety levels over the last 10 years; this was certainly related to the increasing experience of the team and the meticulous selection and monitoring of patients.

Evolution of non-operative management of liver trauma

The management of complex liver injury has changed during the last 30 years. Operative management has evolved into a non-operative management (NOM) approach, with surgery reserved for those who present in extremis or become hemodynamically unstable despite resuscitation. This NOM approach has been associated with improved survival rates in severe liver injury and has been the mainstay of treatment for the last 20 years. Patients that fail NOM and require emergency surgery are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Better patient selection may have an impact not only on the rate of failure of NOM, but the mortality rate associated with it. The aim of this article is to review the evidence that helped shape the evolution of liver injury management during the last 30 years.

Inter-hospital variation in surgical intensity for trauma admissions: A multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for injury care are increasingly moving away from surgical management towards less invasive procedures but there is a knowledge gap on how these recommendations are influencing practice. We aimed to assess inter-hospital variation in surgical intensity for injury admissions and evaluate the correlation between hospital surgical intensity and mortality/complications.

METHODS

We included adults admitted for major trauma between 2006 and 2016 in a Canadian provincial trauma system. Analyses were stratified for orthopaedic (n = 16 887), neurological (n = 12 888) and torso injuries (n = 9816). Surgical intensity was quantified with the number of surgical procedures <72 hours. Inter-hospital variation was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We assessed the correlation between the risk-adjusted mean number of surgical procedures and risk-adjusted incidence of mortality and complications using Pearson correlation coefficients (r).

RESULTS

Moderate inter-hospital variation was observed for orthopaedic surgery (ICC = 14.0%) whereas variation was low for torso surgery (ICC = 2.7%) and neurosurgery (ICC = 0.8%). Surgical intensity was negatively correlated with hospital mortality for torso injury (r = -.32, P = .02) and neurotrauma (r = -.65, P = .08). A strong positive correlation was observed with hospital complications for orthopaedic injuries (r = .36, P = .006) whereas the opposite was observed for neurotrauma (r = -.71, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results should be interpreted with caution as they may be a result of residual confounding. However, they may suggest that there are opportunities for quality improvement in surgical care for injury admissions, particularly for orthopaedic injuries. Moving forward, we should aim to prospectively evaluate adherence to guidelines on non-operative management and their impact on mortality and morbidity.

[Penetrating abdominal trauma]

The management of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma has significantly changed in recent years. While exploratory laparotomy was the gold standard in Germany in all patients up to the 1970s, selective nonoperative management (SNOM) is increasingly being discussed in hemodynamically stable patients without pathological findings in computed tomography (CT) scan or extended focussed assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST). A standard algorithm taking a balance between invasiveness, patient safety and the use of resources into account has still to be implemented in Germany. The presented algorithm includes an immediate laparotomy in hemodynamically unstable patients as damage control surgery followed by a second look procedure after 48 h. Hemodynamically stable patients should primarily undergo diagnostic laparoscopy and be treated by early total care surgery, depending on the clinical and diagnostic imaging findings. Patients without clinical symptoms or pathological findings in imaging studies should be treated according to SNOM with close clinical controls.

Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries

Objectives

Non-operative management (NOM) is increasingly utilised in blunt abdominal trauma. The 1994 American Association of Surgery of Trauma grading (1994-AAST) is applied for clinical decision-making in many institutions. Recently, classifications incorporating contrast extravasation such as the CT severity index (CTSI) and 2018 update of the liver and spleen AAST were proposed to predict outcome and guide treatment, but validation is pending.

Methods

CT images of patients admitted 2000–2016 with blunt splenic and hepatic injury were systematically re-evaluated for 1994/2018-AAST and CTSI grading. Diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for prediction of in-hospital mortality. Correlation with treatment strategy was assessed by Cramer V statistics.

Results

Seven hundred and three patients were analysed, 271 with splenic, 352 with hepatic and 80 with hepatosplenic injury. Primary NOM was applied in 83% of patients; mortality was 4.8%. Comparing prediction of mortality in mild and severe splenic injuries, the CTSI (3.1% vs. 10.3%; diagnostic accuracy = 75.4%; DOR = 3.66; p = 0.006) and 1994-AAST (3.3% vs. 10.5%; diagnostic accuracy = 77.9%; DOR = 3.45; p = 0.010) were more accurate compared with the 2018-AAST (3.4% vs. 8%; diagnostic accuracy = 68.2%; DOR = 2.50; p = 0.059). In hepatic injuries, the CTSI was superior to both AAST classifications in terms of diagnostic accuracy (88.7% vs. 77.1% and 77.3%, respectively). CTSI and 2018-AAST correlated better with the need for surgery in severe vs. mild hepatic (Cramer V = 0.464 and 0.498) and splenic injuries (Cramer V = 0.273 and 0.293) compared with 1994-AAST (Cramer V = 0.389 and 0.255; all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The 2018-AAST and CTSI are superior to the 1994-AAST in correlation with operative treatment in splenic and hepatic trauma. The CTSI outperforms the 2018-AAST in mortality prediction.

Key Points

• Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma is increasingly applied and correct patient stratification is crucial.

• CT-based scoring systems are used to assess injury severity and guide clinical decision-making, whereby the 1994 version of the American Association of Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) is currently most commonly utilised.

• Including contrast media extravasation in CT-based grading improves management and outcome prediction. While the 2018-AAST classification and the CT-severity-index (CTSI) better correlate with need for surgery compared to the 1994-AAST, the CTSI is superior in outcome-prediction to the 2018-AAST.

Early surgical management of severe liver trauma with vascular complication can lead to early discharge

Intrahepatic arterio-portal fistulas are rare complications of blunt hepatic trauma. We describe a case of a 35-year-old male sustaining blunt abdominal trauma resulting in a grade IV liver injury complicated by arterio-portal fistula, portal venous pseudoaneurysm and concomitant bile duct injury. Although arterial embolisation is the mainstay of treatment for arterio-portal fistula, we describe a rationale for early involvement of a hepatobiliary surgeon for multidisciplinary management. Hepatic resection for acute hepatic trauma can, in selected cases, promptly manage all elements of portal triad injury, and in this particular case facilitated early uncomplicated discharge.

Clinical Approach to and Work-up of Bleeding Patients

A bleeding patient is a common consult for interventional radiologists. Prompt triage, preprocedural evaluation specific to the site of hemorrhage, and knowledge of resuscitative strategies allow for a potentially life-saving procedure to be appropriately and safely performed. Having a firm understanding of the clinical work-up and management of a bleeding patient has never been more important. In this article, a discussion of the clinical approach and work-up of a bleeding patient for whom interventional radiology is consulted is followed by a discussion of etiology-specific preprocedural work-up.

Contemporary Management of Hepatic Trauma: What IRs Need to Know

Trauma remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States in patients younger than 45 years. Blunt trauma is most commonly a result of high-speed motor vehicular collisions or high-level fall. The liver and spleen are the most commonly injured organs, with the liver being the most commonly injured organ in adults and the spleen being the most affected in pediatric blunt trauma. Liver injuries incur a high level of morbidity and mortality mostly secondary to hemorrhage. Over the past 20 years, angiographic intervention has become a mainstay of treatment of hepatic trauma. As there is an increasing need for the interventional radiologists to embolize active hemorrhage in the setting of blunt and penetrating hepatic trauma, this article aims to review the current level of evidence and contemporary management of hepatic trauma from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Embolization techniques and associated outcome and complications are also reviewed.

Blood flow of the venous system during resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Noninvasive evaluation using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a viable resuscitation approach for a subdiaphragmatic injury that can regulate arterial blood flow. On the other hand, the evaluation of venous or portal venous blood flow during REBOA remains insufficient because invasive cannulation or exposure of the vessel may affect the blood flow, and Doppler echography is highly operator-dependent. However, phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging has enabled accurate evaluation and noninvasive measurement. This study aimed to investigate the change of venous and portal venous blood flow during REBOA in a porcine model.

METHODS

Seven pigs were anesthetized, and a REBOA catheter was placed. The blood flows of the inferior vena cava (IVC), hepatic vein (HV), portal vein (PV), and superior vena cava (SVC) were measured using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging, in both the balloon deflated (no-REBOA) and fully balloon inflated (REBOA) states. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure, cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance index were measured.

RESULTS

The blood flows of the suprahepatic, infrahepatic, and distal IVC, HV, and PV in the no-REBOA state were 1.40 ± 0.36 L·min, 0.94 ± 0.16 L·min, 0.50 ± 0.19 L·min, 0.060 ± 0.018 L·min, and 0.32 ± 0.091 L·min, respectively. The blood flow of each section in the REBOA condition was significantly decreased at 0.41 ± 0.078 (33% of baseline), 0.15 ± 0.13 (15%), 0.043 ± 0.034 (9%), 0.029 ± 0.017 (37%), and 0.070 ± 0.034 L·min (21%), respectively. The blood flow of the SVC increased significantly in the REBOA condition (1.4 ± 0.63 L·min vs. 0.53 ± 0.14 L·min [257%]). Mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance index were significantly increased after REBOA inflation.

CONCLUSION

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta decreased blood flows of the IVC, HV, and PV and increased blood flow of the SVC. This result could be explained by the collateral flow from the lower body to the SVC. A better understanding of the effect of REBOA on the venous and portal venous systems may help control liver injury.

Surgical treatment for severe liver injuries: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The liver is one of the most frequently injured organs in abdominal trauma. The advancements in diagnosis and interventional therapy shifted the management of liver trauma towards a non-operative management (NOM). Nevertheless, in severe liver injuries (LI), surgical treatment often involving liver resection (LR) and rarely liver transplantation (LT) remains the main option. The present paper analyses a single center experience in a referral HPB center on a series of patients with high-grade liver trauma.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with severe LI, that benefitted from NOM (6 pts), LRs (38 pts), and LT (1 pt) performed in our center between June 2000 and June 2019, were included in a combined prospective and retrospective study. The median age of the patients was 29 years (median 33, range 10-76), and the male/female ratio of 33/12. Almost all cases had blunt trauma, except 2 with stab wound (4.4%).

RESULTS

LIs classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) system were 13.3% (grade III), 44.2% (grade IV), and 42.2% (grade V); none were grade I, II or VI. The rate of major LR was 56.4% (22 LRs). The median operative time was 200 minutes (mean 236; range 150-420). The median blood loss was 750 ml (mean 940; range 500-6500). Overall and major complication rates were 100% (45 pts) and 33.3% (15 pts), respectively. Overall mortality rate was 15.6% (7 pts).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe liver trauma, often involving complex liver resections, should be managed in a referral HPB center, thus obtaining the best results in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Multidetector CT Findings of Solid Organ Injury Based on 2018 Updated American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scaling System

2018년에 새롭게 개정된 장기 손상척도는 이전 미국외상수술협회의 응급수술분류체계와 유사한 형식을 가지며, 고형장기 손상의 등급을 지정하는 기준을 영상(imaging), 수술(operative), 병리(pathologic) 세 가지 세트로 나누어 분류하였다. 2018년 개정에서 가장 중요한 변화는 거짓동맥류와 동정맥 누공을 포함한 혈관 손상의 다중검출CT (multidetector CT; 이하 MDCT) 소견을 정의하여 장기 손상척도에 통합한 것이다. 이전 장기 손상척도와 동일하게 세 가지 기준 중에 가장 높은 등급이 최종 등급이 된다. 또한 한 장기 내에 여러 개의 1등급 또는 2등급 소견이 있으면, 다발성 손상에 대해 3등급의 부여가 가능하다. 본 임상화보에서는 2018년 개정된 미국외상수술협회 장기 손상척도의 MDCT 소견을 소개하고자 한다.

Traumatic Kidney Injury: An Observational Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Renal injuries account for 8-10% of abdominal trauma. We aimed to describe the incidence, presentation, and management of traumatic kidney injury in our institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with traumatic kidney injury at a level 1 trauma center between January 2014 and December 2017.

RESULTS

During a period of 3 years, a total of 152 patients with blunt renal trauma were admitted to a level 1 trauma center; 91% of these were males, with a mean age of 32.8 ± 13.7 years. Motor vehicle crashes accounted for 68% of cases, followed by fall from height (23%). Seventy-one percent of patients had associated chest injuries, 38% had pelvis injuries, and 32% had head injury. Associated abdominal injuries included the liver (35%) and spleen (26%). The mean abdominal abbreviated injury scale was 2.8 ± 1.0; and for those with severe renal injury, it was 3.9 ± 0.9. The mean injury severity score was 24.9 ± 13.7 (31.8 ± 14.2 with renal vs. 21.9 ± 12.9 without renal injury, p = 0.004). Most of the patients were treated conservatively (93%), including severe renal injuries (grades IV and V), and 7% had surgical exploration, mainly those with severe injuries (grades IV and V). The mortality rate was 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade renal injuries in hemodynamically stable patients can be managed conservatively. A multidisciplinary approach coordinated by trauma, urology, and radiology services facilitates the care of these patients in our trauma center.

Kidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines

Renal and urogenital injuries occur in approximately 10-20% of abdominal trauma in adults and children. Optimal management should take into consideration the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries. The management of urogenital trauma aims to restore homeostasis and normal physiology especially in pediatric patients where non-operative management is considered the gold standard. As with all traumatic conditions, the management of urogenital trauma should be multidisciplinary including urologists, interventional radiologists, and trauma surgeons, as well as emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney and urogenital trauma management guidelines.