Initial joint stability affects the outcome after conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocations: a retrospective study

Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW).

RESULTS

Early mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Acute elbow dislocation: a critical appraisal of the literature

Background

The purpose of this study was to perform a narrative review of acute elbow dislocation (AED). There are certain aspects of the management of AED that are controversial, including type and length of immobilization, indications for surgery, type of surgery, and new evidence available.

Material and methods

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies regarding AED. Preference was given to studies according to their level of evidence. Studies regarding the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment, including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and conversion to stabilization or revision surgery were included.

Results

We found only 1 level I study and 3 level II randomized clinical trials. The rest consisted of level III-V evidence. Conservative care continues to be the standard of care for stable AEDs. Shorter immobilization periods are favored when possible. A consensus definition of an unstable elbow still needs to be improved. Unstable simple elbow dislocation may benefit from surgical intervention with different techniques showing similar outcomes. Advances in surgical procedures and suture designs, including tapes, and ligament augmentation, need to prove their role in managing acute elbow instability.

Conclusion

There is a need for higher quality studies after the reduction of an AED, including discerning the outcome of specific patterns of injury and particular groups of patients like high-level athletes or people with preoperative laxity. Comparison between different surgical techniques is warranted, including arthroscopic techniques and types of ligament augmentation to promote early motion and reduce postoperative stiffness.

An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Non-operative Posterolateral Elbow Dislocations

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study is to analyze the outcomes of traumatic posterolateral elbow dislocations using patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). We hypothesized that physical function (PF) and upper extremity (UE) scores in PROMIS will significantly improve over six months of follow-up and correlate with a positive change in the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS).

METHODS

This is a seven-year retrospective study of 165 consecutive adult patients with traumatic posterolateral elbow dislocations. Demographic information, PROMIS PF, PROMIS UE, PROMIS pain interference (PI), PROMIS depression, and PASS were recorded over six months of follow-up.

RESULTS

At the time of injury, mean PROMIS scores were PF 41.24 (SD 11.16), UE 34.27 (SD 11.87), PI 60.44 (SD 8.07), and depression 49.82 (SD 10.42). At six months, the mean PROMIS scores were PF 39.71 (SD 9.71), UE 33.95 (SD 9.09), PI 57.35 (SD 8.59), and depression 51.43 (SD 10.62). The overall six-month changes in PROMIS scores were PF -1.53, UE -0.32, PI -3.09, and depression +1.61. At the 6-month follow-up, 41.7% responded positively on the PASS, which correlated only with PROMIS PI.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who improved from negative to positive response on PASS, the PROMIS PF, UE, and depression scores did not significantly improve. Only PROMIS PI correlated with PASS at the six-month follow-up; PROMIS PI significantly improved among simple posterolateral elbow dislocation patients at both short-term and long-term follow-up points. PROMIS PF, UE, and depression did not significantly differ between time of injury and short-term and long-term follow-up points.

Elbow Kinematics and Function Following Treatment with Open Arthrolysis and Hinged External Fixator

OBJECTIVE

Open arthrolysis (OA) combined with hinged external fixator (HEF) is a promising surgical option for patients with elbow stiffness. This study aimed to investigate elbow kinematics and function following a combined treatment with OA and HEF in elbow stiffness cases.

METHODS

Patients treated with OA with or without HEF due to elbow stiffness were recruited between August 2017 and July 2019. Elbow flexion-extension motion and function (Mayo elbow performance scores, MEPS) were recorded and compared between patients with and without HEF during a 1-year follow-up period. Additionally, those with HEF were assessed by dual fluoroscopy at week 6 postoperatively. Flexion-extension and varus-valgus motions, as well as ligament insertion distances of the anterior medial collateral ligament (AMCL) and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), were compared between the surgical and intact sides.

RESULTS

This study included 42 patients, of which 12 with HEF demonstrated a similar flexion-extension angle and range of motion (ROM) and MEPS as the other patients. In patients with HEF, the surgical elbows showed limitations in flexion-extension (maximal flexion, 120.5° ± 5.3° vs 140.4° ± 6.8°; maximal extension, 13.1° ± 6.0° vs 6.4° ± 3.0°; ROM, 107.4° ± 9.9° vs 134.0° ± 6.8°; all Ps < 0.01) compared with the contralateral sides. During elbow flexion, a gradual valgus-to-varus transition of the ulna, increase in the AMCL insertion distance, and steady change in the LUCL insertion distance were observed, with no significant differences between the bilateral sides.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with OA and HEF demonstrated similar elbow flexion-extension motion and function to those treated with OA alone. Although the use of HEF could not restore an intact flexion-extension ROM and might result in some minor but not significant changes in kinematics, it contributed to clinical outcomes comparable to that of the treatment with OA alone.

High return to sport rate and good patient-reported outcomes in recreational athletes following simple elbow dislocations

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes and return to sport metrics in recreational athletes who suffered simple elbow dislocations and were treated operatively or nonoperatively.

METHODS

The study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were recreational athletes and had experienced a simple elbow dislocation, with at least 2 years having passed since the injury. Patient-reported outcomes including Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Subjective Elbow Value (SEV), Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Return to sport metrics were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (21 females, mean age 43.8 years [95% CI, 39.1-48.5]) who were recreational athletes before their injury completed follow-up at mean 7.6 years (95% CI, 6.7-8.5). There were 29 patients (65.9%) who were treated operatively. Mean MEPS was 93.3 (95% CI, 90.2-96.4), mean SEV was 94.9 (95% CI, 91.9-97.9) and mean OES was 43.3 (95% CI, 41.3-45.4). A total of 36 (81.8%) patients returned to their pre-injury sport. Mean time to return to sport was 21.7 (95% CI, 16.8-26.5) weeks. There was a significant difference in OES (P = .019) and SEV (P = .030) that favored the nonoperative group; however, no significant differences for MEPS, VAS, satisfaction, arc of motion and return to sport were present between groups. A total of five (11.4%) complications were observed and one (2.3%) required revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Good outcomes and a high return to sport rate can be expected in recreational athletes following operative and nonoperative treatment of simple elbow dislocations. However, as many as one-in-five patients may not return to pre-injury sport.

The inter-individual anatomical variation of the trochlear notch as a predisposition for simple elbow dislocation

PURPOSE

Besides the multi-layered capsule-ligamentous complex of the elbow joint the high bony congruence in the ulnohumeral joint contributes to elbow stability. Therefore, we assume that specific anatomical configurations of the trochlear notch predispose to dislocation. In case of ligamentous elbow dislocation both conservative and surgical treatment is possible without a clear treatment algorithm. Findings of constitutional bony configurations could help deciding for the best treatment option.

METHODS

In this retrospective matched-pair analysis we compared MRI imaging from patients sustaining a primary traumatic elbow dislocation (instability group) with patients suffering from chronic lateral epicondylitis (control group), treated between 2009 and 2019. Two independent observers measured different anatomical landmarks of the trochlear notch in a multiplanar reconstructed standardized sagittal trochlear plane (SSTP). Primarily, opening angle and relative depth of the trochlear notch were determined. After adjustment to the proximal ulnar rim in the SSTP, coronoid and olecranon angle, the articular angle as well as the ratio of the tip heights of the trochlear notch were measured.

RESULTS

We compared 34 patients in the instability group (age 48 ± 14 years, f/m 19/15) with 34 patients in the control group (age 47 ± 16 years, f/m 19/15). Instability group showed a significantly larger opening angle (94.1° ± 6.9° vs. 88.5° ± 6.9°, p = 0.0002), olecranon angle (60.9° ± 5.3° vs. 56.1° ± 5.1°, p < 0.0001) and articular angle (24.7° ± 6.4° vs. 22.3° ± 5.8°, p = 0.02) compared to the control group. Measuring the height from the coronoid (ch) and olecranon (oh) tip also revealed a significantly larger tip ratio (tr = ch/oh) in the instability group (2.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.5, p < 0.0001). The relative depth (61.0% ± 8.3% vs. 62.7% ± 6.0%, p = 0.21) of the trochlear notch as well as the coronoid angle (32.8° ± 4.5° vs. 31.7° ± 5.2°, p = 0.30) showed no significant difference in the instability group compared to the control group. The interrater reliability of all measurements was between 0.83 and 0.94.

CONCLUSION

MRI of patients with elbow dislocation show that there seems to be a bony anatomical predisposition. According to the results, it seems reasonable to include predisposing bony factors in the decision-making process when surgical stabilization and conservative treatment is possible. Further biomechanical studies should prove these assumptions to generate critical bony values helping surgeons with decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Simple traumatic elbow dislocations; benefit from early functional rehabilitation: A systematic review with meta-analysis including PRISMA criteria

INTRODUCTION

Elbow dislocation is the second most frequent joint dislocation after shoulder dislocation. They have a high relevance because they can result in subsequent damage and limitations in range of motion. The treatment options are controversially discussed.The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review the literature and analyze the evidence of early functional rehabilitation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed via Ovid Medline, whereby 1645 publications were identified and evaluated in a stepwise approach. Of these publications 29 met the inclusion criteria of the authors and described simple elbow dislocations in 5765 patients.Data from the studies and subgroups included were initially categorized descriptively in conservative and surgical primary therapies, in immobilizing (immobilization lasting 2 weeks or longer) and free-functional follow-up treatments, and those data were then extracted from each subgroup in absolutes. We then pooled these numbers into descriptive statistics to ensure their comparability. We determined the success rates from the numbers of excellent and good results of the specific used outcome scores.

RESULTS

The effect estimate of the conservative therapy's success rate was 84% and for surgical treatment 80% (P < .0001). The difference between the immobilizing treatment (78% success rate) and early-function therapy (83% success rate) was significant (P = .002).In a subgroup analysis the success rate of conservative and immobilizing therapy was 79%, of conservative and early-functional therapy 91%, of surgical and immobilizing groups' was 77% and of the surgical and early-functional therapies was 93%. The difference among the 4 treatment options was significant (P < .0001), as were differences between the 2 conservative groups (P < .0001) and between the 2 surgical groups (P = .044).

DISCUSSION

Conservative therapy is the dominant therapy. Regardless of the primary therapy chosen in simple elbow dislocations: early functional follow-up care seems to be superior to immobilizing therapy with a duration more than 2 weeks.

Lateral Elbow Laxity Is Affected by the Integrity of the Radial Band of the Lateral Collateral Ligament Complex: A Cadaveric Model With Sequential Releases and Varus Stress Simulating Everyday Activities

BACKGROUND

An elongation of the radial lateral collateral complex (R-LCL) can provoke symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow leading to lateral elbow pain. Biomechanical models investigating the effects of elongation and partial or complete lesions of the R-LCL on lateral elbow stability are lacking.

PURPOSE

To evaluate how partial and complete R-LCL release affects radiocapitellar joint stability in a setting of controlled varus load and progressive soft tissue release.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were obtained and mounted on a custom-made support to control elbow flexion and extension and to allow for controlled varus loading. Stress tests were performed on all intact specimens under gravity load alone, a 0.5-kg load applied to the hand, and a 1-kg load applied to the hand. After load application, anteroposterior radiographs were obtained. The following release sequence was applied to all specimens: release of the anterior half of the common extensor origin, pie crusting of the R-LCL, and R-LCL release. After each release, stress tests and radiographs were performed. The varus joint angulation of the elbow (α) was measured by 2 examiners as the main outcome parameter.

RESULTS

Significant changes in α from the initial condition occurred after each release, and a significant effect of varus load on α was documented for all release steps. A significant effect of the releases on α could be documented for all identical varus load conditions. A linear regression model was generated to describe the effect of varus load on α.

CONCLUSION

Varus loads simulating everyday activities produce changes in the varus joint angulation of the elbow already in the intact specimen, which are linearly dependent on the applied moment and persist after release of the lateral stabilizing structures. With progressive load, a pie crusting of the R-LCL is the minimal procedure able to provoke a significant change in the varus joint angulation, and a complete R-LCL release produces additional increase in the varus joint angulation in all testing conditions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings confirm the role of the R-LCL as static lateral stabilizer, supporting a pathological model based on its insufficiency and culminating with a symptomatic minor instability of the lateral elbow.

Does sonography allow an objective and reproducible distinction between stable, hypermobile, and unstable elbow joints?

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of residual or chronic elbow instability is often challenging. Sonography allows a dynamic examination of the elbow joint without any radiation exposure. The purpose of this prospective single-center study was to investigate the application of sonography for the evaluation of ligamentous instabilities of the elbow joint. Therefore, asymptomatic (stable) and acute dislocated (unstable) elbows were examined by sonography.

METHODS

A total of 72 elbows in 36 participants (23 women and 13 men; mean age, 40 ± 17 years [range, 18-82 years]) were examined. Group 1 (G1 [normal]) included 40 unaffected, asymptomatic elbow joints; 28 elbows belonged to 14 voluntary participants (bilateral), whereas 12 asymptomatic elbows belonged to patients who had an acute elbow dislocation (contralateral elbow). Group 2 (G2 [hypermobile]) included 20 hypermobile elbow joints in 10 participants (bilateral), and group 3 (G3 [unstable]) included 12 acute unstable elbow joints without bony lesions. Radiographic assessment included sonography of both elbow joints with standardized measurements of the neutral and stressed radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral distances (calculated as Δ values). Two investigators independently performed all measurements. Additionally, plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging of the affected elbow joints were obtained in G3.

RESULTS

On the radial side, the mean radiocapitellar Δ was statistically higher in G3 (2.2 ± 1.6 mm) than in G1 (0.5 ± 0.4 mm, P < .01) or G2 (0.8 ± 0.6 mm, P < .01). G3 also showed an increased ulnohumeral Δ (2.7 ± 0.7 mm) compared with G1 (1.0 ± 0.7 mm, P < .01) or G2 (0.9 ± 0.3 mm, P < .01). No significant differences in the mean radiocapitellar Δ (P = .06) and ulnohumeral Δ (P = .26) were found between G1 and G2. Within G3, Δ was significantly higher at the affected elbow joint than at the contralateral, unaffected elbow joint (P = .04 for the radial side and P = .04 for the ulnar side). The inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.82 for the radial side and 0.74 for the ulnar side. Patients with collateral ligament injuries, diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging, showed higher Δ values than those with intact collateral ligaments, although no significant difference was found.

CONCLUSION

Sonography of the elbow joint is a valuable imaging tool for the assessment of ligamentous instability. Nevertheless, a distinction between healthy and hypermobile elbow joints is not possible, and therefore, obtaining a complete clinical history and examination is vital. We further recommend comparing the affected elbow joint with the contralateral side to access intraindividual differences.

Hidden instability in posttraumatic stiff elbows

BACKGROUND

Hidden instability could be one of the reasons for reoccurring stiffness after arthrolysis in posttraumatic elbows. Associated instability in stiff posttraumatic elbows is clinically hard to detect. Surgical treatment for instability and stiffness in the same surgical setting is challenging and has not been evaluated as of yet.

HYPOTHESIS

The primary hypothesis assumes (1) the existence of a posttraumatic "stiff and unstable elbow" and (2) that coexisting instability can be detected by arthroscopic instability testing. The secondary objective was to report the midterm results after arthrolysis and ligament stabilization in the stiff and unstable elbow.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2015, 55 patients received arthroscopic arthrolysis of the elbow due to posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution. The arthroscopic instability was categorized into three grades with a switching stick: grade I (= stable), grade II (mild instability) and grade III (grossly instable). In cases of persisting instability (grade II-III), a ligament stabilization procedure was performed and all patients were followed up clinically at a minimum of 12 months. Besides ROM and clinical joint stability, PROs (patient reported outcomes) were assessed with the PREE-score (patient-rated elbow evaluation) and the Oxford-Elbow-score (OES). Furthermore, the MEPS (Mayo-elbow-performance-score) was assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 55 cases presenting for arthrolysis, coexisting elbow instability was detected during arthroscopic instability testing in 22 cases (40%). All 22 patients received additional ligament stabilization. At final follow-up 62.7 ± 35.7 months postoperatively, 20 patients (12 men; 8 women) with a mean age of 42 ± 16.8 were available. PREE, OES and MEPS were 19.8 ± 25.3, 37.5 ± 9.8 and 80 ± 14.5, respectively. ROM improved significantly from 95° ± 29° to 110° ± 24° postoperatively (p = 0.045). Five patients required revision arthrolysis within the follow-up period (20%). One patient demonstrated persisting instability (5%).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative instability diagnostics during arthroscopic arthrolysis helps detect persisting posttraumatic instability and may provide a solid indication for a concurrent ligament stabilization procedure. This study is the first to present the postoperative results after arthrolysis with stabilization of the posttraumatic, stiff and unstable elbow. However, the results are heterogenic with 25% requiring revision arthrolysis. Therefore, the stiff but unstable elbow remains a complex clinical presentation in need of further investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

MRI in acute simple elbow dislocations: correlation of preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings of collateral ligaments and associated soft tissue injuries

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was the evaluation of correspondence among collateral ligaments and other soft tissue injuries detected by MRI and by intraoperative findings in a consecutive series of patients treated for simple elbow dislocation.

METHODS

After clinical and MRI examination, 16 out of 59 consecutive patients with moderate or severe instability after simple elbow dislocation were addressed to surgical treatment. There were 14 men and 2 women. The mean age was 39.6 years (range 16-69 years).

RESULTS

MRI showed full-thickness lesion of MCL in 9/16 patients (53.3%) and partial lesion in 6/16 patients (40%), and in 1 case, the MCL was considered intact. On the lateral side, MRI showed complete injury of LCL in 7/16 patients (46.6%) and partial injury in 7/16 patients (40%). No lesions of LCL were observed in 2 patients (13.4%). MCL was surgically explored in all the patients. We observed 10/16 full-thickness lesions (62.5%) and 6/16 partial lesions (37.5%). LCL was surgically explored in 11/16 patients. We observed 6/11 full-thickness lesions (54.6%) and 5/11 partial lesions (45.4%). In 3 cases, associated soft tissue injuries were detected. The rate of concordance between MRI and surgical findings was 87.5% (14/16 cases) on the medial side and 90.9% (10/11 cases) on the lateral side.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that MRI is a reliable and useful tool to investigate collateral ligaments and soft tissue injuries around the elbow and to plan the most adequate surgical treatment.

Reliability of dynamic fluoroscopy for medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection

Background

The aim of this study was to examine whether dynamic fluoroscopy is reliable for assessment of medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection and different stages of medial collateral ligament (MCL) dissection in a cadaveric elbow model.

Materials and methods

Six intact elbow specimens were measured for joint angulation while applying valgus stress in four examination conditions (Examiner 1, Examiner 2, 1 Nm, 2 Nm) in four different elbow positions (fully pronated or supinated at 0° of elbow extension and 30° of elbow flexion). The elbow specimens were examined for valgus stress in three stages: (1) intact, (2) after radial head resection, and (3) after subsequent dissection of the complete MCL. Anteroposterior radiographs of the elbow were made at each stage to determine joint angulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

Results

In intact elbows, mean joint angulation ranged from 2.2° ± 2.0 (1 Nm) to 5.2° ± 2.3 (Examiner 1). Radial head resection did not increase joint angulation during valgus stress, regardless of joint position and examination condition (Examiner 1: 5.5°; Examiner 2: 5.0°; 1 Nm: 2.6°, 2 Nm: 3.9°). Additional dissection of the MCL led to significantly higher joint angulation during measurements with the standardized torques (1 Nm: 12.4°; 2 Nm: 23.3°). Very good to excellent ICCs for joint angulation between Examiner 1 and Examiner 2 (0.861 to 0.959) were found.

Conclusion

Dynamic fluoroscopy is a reliable diagnostic tool for determining medial elbow stability in the presence of radial head resection and different stages of MCL dissection.

Multi-centre retrospective study of the long-term outcome following suspected traumatic elbow luxation in 32 cats

OBJECTIVES

To describe reduction techniques and clinical outcome in a series of traumatic elbow luxations in cats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of unilateral elbow luxations treated at five specialist referral centres. Data included signalment, aetiology, concurrent injuries, luxation direction, time to reduction, primary reduction technique, surgical procedure and complications. Cases were excluded if reduction technique was unknown. Telephone owner questionnaire follow-up was completed using a Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index.

RESULTS

Thirty-two cats were included. Lateral luxations were most common (n = 21). Time (hours) until attempted initial closed reduction was <24 (n = 12), 24-48 (n = 13), >48 (n = 3) or unrecorded (n = 4). Luxation was treated by closed reduction alone (n = 7) or by surgery (n = 25); 14 of 25 cases underwent primary surgical reduction and 11 of 25 were secondary procedures following failure of closed reduction. Transcondylar bone tunnels and circumferential suture (n = 19) was the most commonly used surgical technique. Catastrophic (n = 1), major (n = 11) and minor complications (n = 5) were recorded; reluxation occurred more frequently after closed reduction (n = 8) than after open reduction with fixation (n = 0). Feline Musculoskeletal Pain Index data were available for 12 cats; outcome was good-excellent in all 12, with a median function score of 64.5/68 (range: 55-68) and a median pain score of 0/15 (range: 0-5). Outcome was not associated with reduction technique.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Elbow reluxation occurred in 61% of cats following primary closed reduction but did not occur in any open reduction cases. Reluxation rate increased with duration from injury. Most cats had good-excellent owner-assessed outcome, regardless of reduction technique.

Severe traumatic valgus instability of the elbow: pathoanatomy and outcomes of primary operation

Background

The objective of the study was to depict the pathoanatomy of traumatic valgus instability of the elbow and to report clinical outcomes of primary operation.

Methods

Thirty-one patients presented with traumatic valgus instability of the elbow without dislocation. Thirty-one patients underwent surgical intervention of radial head fractures (28 open reduction and internal fixation and 3 radial head resection) and anatomical repair of the anterior bundle of medial collateral ligament (AMCL) with suture anchors. Twenty patients with disruption of the flexor-pronator tendon (FPT) and 14 patients with tears of the anterior capsule had primary repair of the FPT and anterior capsule simultaneously. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), modified hospital for special surgery assessment scale (HSS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

The median follow-up was 37.3 months (range, 15–53 months). Radial head fractures and complete avulsion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) from its humeral footprint were confirmed in all patients intraoperatively. Intraoperative findings indicated disruption of the FPT in 20 patients and tears of the anterior capsule in 14 patients. Twenty-nine of 31 patients returned to previous activity and work levels within 6 months after surgery. The MEPS, modified HSS, and DASH score were 94 ± 4, 91 ± 5, and 8 ± 2 at the latest follow-up.

Conclusions

Radial head fractures with avulsion of the MCL can lead to severe valgus instability of the elbow. Primary operation to repair these disrupted structures, especially repair of the AMCL, can effectively restore valgus stability.

Anterior elbow dislocation without fracture in an adult: a rare injury pattern

Anterior elbow dislocation without periarticular fracture (simple dislocation) is an extremely rare injury and is usually caused by distraction or torsional forces. It is important to look for associated ligamentous and musculotendinous injuries in this pattern. We report an elderly patient who sustained simple anterior dislocation of the elbow and in whom successful closed reduction could be achieved. Reduction by closed method is possible if we know the exact mechanism of elbow injury. Despite the presence of medial collateral ligament injury, he was managed non-operatively and had full functional recovery. Checking for joint stability and collateral ligaments after reduction and getting additional radiological investigations help in better treatment planning. Early protected active mobilisation should be initiated to achieve better functional results.

Primary Ligament Repair for Acute Elbow Dislocation

The elbow is the second most common site for joint dislocation after the shoulder. Elbow dislocations are classified according to the direction of dislocation, with most (80%) being posterolateral. A spectrum of soft-tissue injury may also be present, depending on the direction of dislocation and the energy applied. Most dislocations of the elbow can be treated nonoperatively, but recurrent instability and/or stiffness occur in up to 10% and 40% of patients, respectively. The aim of early surgical stabilization is to prevent these long-term complications. To avoid overtreatment, magnetic resonance imaging is used to identify patients at a greater risk of complications by determining the grade of soft-tissue injury. Those with grade-3 or 4 injuries are managed with fluoroscopic examination under anesthesia. (1) The patient is positioned supine. Fluoroscopic examination is performed with the elbow in full extension and in 30° of flexion. Varus stress is applied with the forearm in pronation. If >10° of joint opening is found, open surgical repair of the lateral ligament complex and common extensor origin is performed. (2) A 5-cm incision is made using a direct lateral approach centered on the lateral epicondyle. The tough lateral fascia may be intact and should be incised in line with the anconeus interval. (3) A rent in the common extensor origin may be found, which can be used for the approach; otherwise, proceed with a Kocher approach to identify the sleeve avulsion of the lateral ligament complex from the humerus. (4) A number-2 synthetic braided suture is used to whip-stitch the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, which is repaired to the lateral epicondyle with use of a bone anchor. The trailing suture ends from the anchor are used to repair the common extensor tendon origin with use of a Mayo needle. (5) With the forearm in supination to externally rotate the humerus and lock the shoulder, valgus instability is assessed with the elbow in full extension and in 30° of flexion. If the medial joint line opens >10°, repair the medial structures in the same manner as the lateral ligament complex through an incision posterior to the medial epicondyle while protecting the ulnar nerve. (6) The patient is referred to physiotherapy for immediate hourly overhead exercises. This approach should prevent complications of recurrent instability or stiffness, as early results have been encouraging with no complications recorded.

Functional outcomes and complications of open elbow dislocations

Background

The current study investigated the clinical outcome of open elbow dislocations, focusing on the influence of associated soft tissue and bone injury.

Patients and methods

From October 2008 to August 2015, 230 patients with elbow dislocations were treated at the study center. Our retrospective study comprised 21 cases of open elbow dislocations. The mean age of patients was 49 years (20–83 years); there were six (29%) female and 15 (71%) male patients. The range of motion (ROM) of the injured and uninjured elbow was measured, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Mayo Wrist Score (MWS), and Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. Complications and revision surgeries were recorded. The influence of the severity of soft tissue injury (I°/II° open vs. III° open) and type of dislocation (simple vs. complex) was evaluated.

Results

After a 57-month follow-up (range, 24–98 months), the mean DASH score was 20 ± 15, the MEPS was 82 ± 11, and the MWS was 74 ± 22. The ROM of the injured elbow was significantly decreased compared with the uninjured one (arc of ulnohumeral motion: 104° vs. 137°; p = 0.001). Patients with I°/II° open elbow dislocations had a better clinical outcome according to the MEPS (86 ± 11 vs. 76 ± 9; p = 0.045) and a comparable outcome according to the DASH score (19 ± 18 vs. 21 ± 9; p = 0.238). In all, 11 patients (52%) had postoperative complications and 11 patients underwent at least one revision surgery. Complex elbow dislocations had significantly more complications and revision surgeries than simple dislocations (77% vs. 13%; p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Favorable clinical outcomes can be achieved after treatment of open elbow dislocations. These injuries are prone to neurovascular damage and complex dislocations are linked to high rates of complications and revision surgeries.

[Acute and chronic instability of the elbow joint]

Elbow dislocations are frequent and present with a broad spectrum of subsequent ligamentous and soft tissue injuries. Beside clinical examination, fluoroscopy, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can specify the extent of the injuries and provide a foundation for decision-making between conservative and operative treatment. This article highlights the basic underlying biomechanics and anatomy, discusses the trauma mechanisms and presents clinical and imaging diagnostic procedures. Treatment algorithms for conservative and surgical treatment are presented in detail. In addition to acute instability, chronic instability of the elbow has recently been recognized as the cause of a large variety of symptoms, often resulting in significant functional impairment. The most commonly used techniques for reconstruction of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments and the rehabilitation protocols are described in detail.

Determination of Elbow Laxity in a Sequential Soft-Tissue Injury Model: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to analyze, under fluoroscopy, joint angulation of uninjured elbows and elbows with distinct induced collateral ligament injury.

METHODS

Twelve elbow specimens were tested for varus and valgus joint angulation using 4 different examination methods (application of both varus and valgus stress by each of 2 examiners [Examiner 1 and Examiner 2] and application of 1 and 2 Nm of torque using a calibrated electric force scale) in 4 elbow positions (in full extension with 90° of supination and 90° of pronation, and in 30° of flexion with 90° of supination and 90° of pronation). Six elbow specimens were examined under varus stress at each of 5 sequential stages: (1) intact, (2) transection of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), (3) complete transection of the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC), (4) transection of the anterior aspect of the capsule (AC), and (5) transection of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). An additional 6 elbow specimens were examined under valgus stress at 5 sequential stages: (1) intact, (2) transection of the anteromedial collateral ligament (AML), (3) complete transection of the MCL, (4) transection of the AC, and (5) transection of the LCLC. Examinations under fluoroscopy were made to measure the joint angulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Testing of the intact elbow specimen by both examiners showed a joint angulation of <5°. Transection of the LUCL led to a varus joint angulation of 4.3° to 7.0°, and transection of the AML resulted in a valgus joint angulation of 4.9° to 8.8°. Complete dissection of the respective collateral ligament complex resulted in a joint angulation of 7.9° to 13.4° (LCLC) and 9.1° to 12.3° (MCL), and additional transection of the AC led to a joint angulation of >20° in some positions in both the medial and the lateral series. Under varus stress, elbow dislocations occurred only after dissection of the LCLC+AC (26% of the examinations) and additional dissection of the MCL (59%). Under valgus stress, elbow dislocations occurred only after dissection of the MCL+AC (30%) and additional dissection of the LCLC (47%). Very good to excellent ICCs were found among Examiners 1 and 2 and the tests done with the standardized torques at stages 1 through 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic fluoroscopy makes it possible to distinguish among different stages of collateral ligament injury of the elbow and therefore might be helpful for guiding treatment of simple elbow dislocations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Assessment of collateral ligament injury with varus and valgus stress testing under fluoroscopy is an easily available method and is often used as the imaging modality of choice to determine the degree of elbow laxity. The technique and results described in this study should form the basis for additional clinical studies.

Unstable simple elbow dislocations: medium-term results after non-surgical and surgical treatment

PURPOSE

Determination of the appropriate treatment of unstable simple elbow dislocations is difficult and a topic of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome and complications after surgery and conservative treatment, with special focus on post-traumatic joint laxity.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 118 consecutive patients with simple elbow dislocations underwent stability testing by fluoroscopy after joint reduction and were assigned to groups 1 (slight), 2 (moderate) or 3 (gross) depending on post-traumatic joint laxity. All patients of group 1 underwent conservative treatment, and of group 3 primary ligament repair. In patients with moderate elbow laxity, the treatment was decided individually. All patients underwent a similar functional rehabilitation programme during treatment. Clinical outcome was determined after an average of 3.4 ± 1.5 years using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and treatment-associated complications and revisions were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (41.5 %) were assigned to group 1, 41 patients (34.7 %) to group 2 and 28 patients (23.7 %) to group 3. In group 2, 22 patients underwent ligament repair, while 19 patients were treated conservatively. On average, an excellent MEPS was achieved in group 1 after conservative treatment (MEPS 95.8 ± 9.0), similar to results after ligament repair of grossly unstable elbows in group 3 (91.6 ± 11.7). Interestingly, in group 2 conservative treatment was associated with a slightly lower MEPS (90.0 vs. 95.7), and significantly fewer patients achieved an excellent MEPS (81.8 vs. 52.6 %, p = 0.045). Similarly, conservative treatment in group 2 was associated with a fivefold to sixfold risk of complications (p = 0.032) and revision surgery (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the notion that patients with slight elbow laxity can be treated non-operatively, while primary surgical treatment should be performed in patients with moderate and gross laxity to avoid post-traumatic sequelae and decrease revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Simple elbow dislocation

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated major joint in adults. Good long-term outcomes have been reported after non-operative management; however, a small proportion (<10%) of patients have a poor outcome and some do require surgical intervention. A review of the anatomy, pathoanatomy, management and outcomes of simple elbow dislocations is presented. Emphasis is placed on emerging concepts regarding the soft tissue injury, the stabilising structures that are injured, the sequence and mechanism of injury and the relationship to elbow stability. The benefits of nonsurgical and surgical management are discussed and a treatment algorithm based on the pathoanatomy is proposed.

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of ligamentous injuries on conventional MRI after simple elbow dislocation

Background

The primary objective of this study was to assess the interobserver and intraobserver agreement on ligamentous injuries on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute simple elbow dislocation. The secondary objectives were to determine the interobserver agreement on the assessment of joint congruity, joint effusion, loose bodies and chondral lesions on conventional MRI.

Methods

Conventional MRIs (1.5 Tesla, elbow specific surface coil) of 30 patients (40.7 years; range 14–72) with simple elbow dislocations were evaluated by four blinded examiners. An analysis of the interobserver agreement of all raters and for several subgroups (radiologists, orthopaedics, experienced, non-experienced) was performed. The examiners assessed the integrity (intact, partial tear, complete tear) of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), extensor and flexor tendons, as well as the presence of joint congruity, joint effusion, loose bodies and chondral lesions. Agreement strength, correlation and proportion of exact agreement were determined for interobserver agreement, and intraobserver agreement analyses.

Results

Interobserver agreement of all examiners was fair to moderate for collateral ligaments (LCL: 0.441, MCL: 0.275). Exact agreement of all raters was found in 33.3% for the LCL and in 26.7% for the MCL. The both experienced examiners showed highest agreement strength for the LCL (0.619) and the radiologists showed highest agreement strength for the MCL (0.627), the proportion of exact agreement was 60.0% in both categories. A high proportion of exact agreement regarding joint congruity (90%), joint effusion (100%), loose bodies (96.7%) and chondral lesion (80%) was found among the radiologists. The evaluation of the intraobserver agreement revealed slight to substantial agreement (0.227 to 0.718) for the collateral ligaments.

Conclusions

This study shows difficulties in the evaluation of ligaments by conventional MRI technique as demonstrated by a weak inter- and intraobserver agreement. This should be the basis to develop new MRI quality standards with special focus on coronal oblique reconstructions to improve the evaluation of ligament injuries after simple elbow dislocations.