Greater rate of cephalic screw mobilisation following proximal femoral nailing in hip fractures with a tip-apex distance (TAD) and a calcar referenced TAD greater than 25 mm

Trochanteric fractures: Tip-Apex distance, Calcar Tip-Apex distance, and Chang criteria-a multiple variable analysis

Failure of osteosynthesis is a common complication of the nailing of trochanteric fractures which typically occurs through form of cut-out. Tip-Apex distance (TAD), Calcar Tip-Apex distance (CalTAD), and Chang criteria are validated variables to predict failure of cephalomedullary nailing. This is a retrospective study which analyzes treatment of trochanteric fractures from 2018 to 2020 (n = 296) evaluating postoperative radiographs and factors of mechanical failure. Our objective was to assess correlation among these variables and their influence on mechanical failure, either individually or creating a new score. Our results support the CalTAD and Chang's criteria as valid predictors of mechanical failure. Furthermore, they empathize the importance of fracture reduction and proper placement of cervical screw. To our knowledge, this is the first study performing multivariate analysis including these 3 variables.

Total hip arthroplasty following the failure of intertrochanteric nailing: First implant or salvage surgery?

BACKGROUND

Proximal femur fractures, including both intracapsular (femoral neck fractures) and extracapsular fractures (intertrochanteric femoral fractures, IFFs), affect around 1.5 million people per year worldwide. Mechanical failures of intertrochanteric nailing in IFFs could be managed with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

AIM

To describe the surgical complexity and the procedure-related complication rates in patients with trochanteric nailing failure and treated with THA.

METHODS

Patients referred to our level I trauma center between April 2012 and July 2018 with failed cephalomedullary nailing following trochanteric fractures were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent a salvage surgical procedure, i.e., cephalomedullary nail removal and conversion to THA. The same surgical and anesthesiology team performed the surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-ups for at least 24 mo. Complications and re-operations were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria (male: 29; female: 45; mean age: 73.8-years-old; range: 65-89) and were included in the current study. The average operative time was 117 min (76-192 min). The average blood loss was 585 mL (430-1720 mL). Among the 74 patients, 43 (58.1%) required transfusion of three or more blood units. Two patients died within the 4th d after surgery because of pulmonary embolism, and 1 patient died 9 mo after surgery due to ischemic myocardial infarction. The complication rate in the 71 patients who completed the minimum 24-mo follow-up was 22.5%. In 3 cases out of 71 (4.2%) periprosthetic acetabular fracture was observed during the follow-up. One of these periacetabular fractures occurred intraoperatively. An intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture was observed in 5 patients out of 71 (7.0%). Four of these patients needed a re-operation to fix the fracture with plates and cerclages; in one of these patients, femoral stem revision was also necessary. In 4 patients out of 71 (5.6%), an early THA dislocation was observed, whereas in 1 case (1.4%) a late THA dislocation was observed. Three patients out of 71 (4.2%) developed a periprosthetic joint infection during the study follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that salvage options for IFF fixation failure are complex procedures with a relevant intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.

A new scoring system for predicting cut-out risk in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine all the potential risk factors defined in the literature for cut-out after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in managing intertrochanteric fractures and (2) make a reliable prediction about the likelihood of cut-out by developing a quantitative scoring system.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty patients who were operated on for an intertrochanteric femur fracture were included in the study. The patients were evaluated retrospectively. Radiological parameters known to affect cut-out, including tip apex distance (TAD), calcarreferenced TAD (CalTAD), and reduction quality, were also used to evaluate the patients. Additionally, the classification of the fracture according to the cortical thickness index for osteoporosis, the Charlson comorbidity index for additional comorbidities, and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Für Osteosynthesefragen classification were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cut-out rate among all patients was 7.2%. Cut-out risk could be predicted by gender, TAD, CalTAD, and reduction quality. Female gender, TAD > 29.45, CalTAD > 31.75, and acceptable or poor reduction quality significantly increased the cut-out risk. Based on the chi-square analysis, it was determined that there was a significant relationship between the cut-out risk and the variables of TAD, CalTAD, reduction quality, gender, and fracture type (P=.000, P=.000, P=.000, P=.008, P=.016, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed a strong correlation between the newly developed scoring system and the risk of cut-out. The risk of cut-out increased 8.1 times in individuals with a score of more than 2 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Female gender, TAD > 29.45, CalTAD > 31.75, and acceptable or poor reduction quality are the parameters found to be significant in determining the cut-out risk. With the newly developed scoring system, risks can be calculated for all situations that may occur according to the scores obtained by the patients. The cut-out risk increases significantly in patients with a score above 2 points.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Diagnostic Study.

Cephalomedullary nailing for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures 31A3 (AO/OTA)

INTRODUCTION

Reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures are classified by the Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA]/[AO] as 31A3, and account for up to one-third of all hip fractures, and 2-23% of all trochanteric fractures. The treatment of choice of those fractures is intramedullary nailing as it decreases soft tissue damage and permits early weight bearing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients surgically treated for 31A3 fractures from October 2018 to January 2022 in a high-volume regional referral centre. All the patients had been treated with intramedullary nailing.

RESULTS

The selected group included 11 males (16%) and 59 females (84%), with a mean age of 83.6 years (range 61 to 96 years). A Trigen Intertan Nail was the most frequent choice of intramedullary nailing in 33 patients (47%), an Elos Long nail was chosen in 19 cases (27%), while a ZNN nail was used in 18 patients (26%). The mean time between admission and surgery was 2.5 days, with a mean Hb value of 10.5 g/dl reported preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with an Intertan nail reported the lowest TAD, CALTAD, and TALCALTAD mean radiographic values, and the lowest rate of Hb loss and blood transfusions.

Medium-Term Outcomes of a Forward-Striking Technique to Reduce Fracture Gaps during Long Cephalomedullary Nailing in Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures

INTRODUCTION

A residual fracture gap after intramedullary nailing is a known risk factor for delayed union and non-union. This study aimed to report the outcomes of a forward-striking technique to reduce fracture gaps during long cephalomedullary nailing in subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with SFFs treated in a single institution between February 2013 and October 2018. A total of 58 patients treated via long cephalomedullary nailing with a forward-striking technique were included. The width of the fracture gap, location of the cephalic screw, tip-apex distance (TAD), and time to bone union were evaluated using intraoperative and postoperative radiographs. Complication rates, including fixation failure, non-union, implant breakage, and infection, were assessed. The mean follow-up duration was 4 (range, 2‒8) years.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients (mean age, 67.9 years), 38 (65.5%) were female. Thirty-two cases (55.2%) were classified as atypical femoral fractures. The mean fracture gap reduced from 5.1 mm to 1.6 mm by forward striking (P<0.001). The reduced fracture gap was significantly greater in atypical SFFs (mean, 4.9 mm vs. 1.7 mm; P<0.001). The lag screw was located in the center-center or center-inferior zones of the femoral head in 54 patients (93.1%). The mean TAD was 14.2 mm and was under 25 mm in 55 patients (94.8%). Bone union was achieved in all cases without reoperation at a mean of 5.4 months. One incident of lag screw breakage was noted at 5 months, but bone union was achieved at 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The forward-striking technique with a long cephalomedullary nail demonstrated a 100% bone union rate in a consecutive series of 58 SFFs. This technique is effective in reducing the fracture gap as well as placing the cephalic screw into the optimal position. The forward-striking technique was particularly effective in reducing atypical SFFs with a transverse or short oblique configuration.

Proximal Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: A Few Things to Know, and Some to Forget

Hip fractures are a leading cause of hospitalisation in elderly patients, representing an increasing socioeconomic problem arising from demographic changes, considering the increased number of elderly people in our countries. Adequate peri-operative treatment is essential to decrease mortality rates and avoid complications. Modern management should involve a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, early surgery, pain treatment, balanced fluid therapy, and prevention of delirium, to improve patients' functional and clinical outcomes. The operative treatment for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures is intramedullary nail or sliding/dynamic hip screw (DHS) on the basis of the morphology of the fracture. In the case of neck fractures, total hip replacement (THR) or hemiarthroplasty are recommended. However, several topics remain debated, such as the optimum thromboprophylaxis to reduce venous thromboembolism or the use of bone cement. Postoperatively, patients can benefit from early mobilisation and geriatric multidisciplinary care. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, a prolonged time to operation with a subsequent increased complication rate have burdened frail and elderly patients with hip fractures. Future studies are needed with the aim to investigate better strategies to improve nutrition, postoperative mobility, to clarify the role of home-based rehabilitation, and to identify the ideal analgesic treatment and adequate tools in case of patients with cognitive impairment.

Association between Immediate Postoperative Radiographic Findings and Failed Internal Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Failed internal fixations for trochanteric fractures have a strong negative impact owing to increased postoperative mortality and high medical costs. However, evidence on the prognostic value of postoperative radiographic findings for failed internal fixations is limited. We aimed to clarify the association between comprehensive immediate postoperative radiographic findings and failed internal fixation using relative and absolute risk measures. We followed the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane handbook. We searched specific databases in November 2021. The outcomes of interest were failed internal fixation and cut-out. We pooled the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a random-effects model and calculated the number needed to harm for each outcome. Thirty-six studies involving 8938 patients were included. The certainty of evidence in the association between postoperative radiographic findings and failed internal fixation or cut-out was mainly low or very low except for the association between intramedullary malreduction on the anteromedial cortex and failed internal fixation. Moderate certainty of evidence supported that intramedullary malreduction on the anteromedial cortex was associated with failed internal fixation. Most postoperative radiographic findings on immediate postoperative radiographs for trochanteric fractures were uncertain as prognostic factors for failed internal fixations.

The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation

Background

The location of cephalic fixator tip with different eccentric distance (ED) should have different risks of cutout. This study aims to evaluate the cephalic fixator tip position by measuring ED of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail (SCMN) fixation and analyze the correlation between the cutout and the ED.

Methods

Firstly, we assumed all the femoral head was a regular sphere and standardized the radius of the femoral head (R_FD) as “3” no matter how big the R_FD was for complete match of the Cleveland zone system and convenient identification of artificial intelligence. Secondly, we measured the ED of the cephalic fixator tip by calculating the distances from the cephalic fixator tip to the geometric central axis of the femoral neck and head on both AP view and lateral view radiographs. Thirdly, we evaluated all the ED of the cephalic fixator tip in the eligible 123 geriatric ITF patients and analyzed the correlation between the cutout and the ED.

Results

The ED in cutout group (1.25 ± 0.43) is much bigger than that in non-cutout group (0.64 ± 0.34) with significant difference (OR = 50.01, 95% CI 8.42–297.19, p < 0.001). The probability of cutout increased with ED increasing, especially when “ED ≥ 1.” The best cutoff value of ED for predicting cutout was “1.022” (“1.022” was just a little bit more than 1/3 times of R_FD because “R_FD = 3,” sensitivity = 73.3%, specificity = 86.1%, and AUC = 0.867, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

ED is suitable for evaluation of the cephalic fixator tip position for predicting cutout in geriatric ITF patients with SCMN fixation, and ED can potentially be used as artificial intelligence application during surgery. The smaller the ED, the lower the cutout rate. For avoiding cutout, the ED of the cephalic fixator tip should be less than one-third times of the radius of the femoral head.

Short cephalomedullary nail toggle: a closer examination

OBJECTIVES

In patients with wide femoral canals, an undersized short nail may not provide adequate stability, leading to toggling of the nail around the distal interlocking screw and subsequent loss of reduction. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with nail toggle and to examine whether increased nail toggle is associated with increased varus collapse.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 and level 3 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-one patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with short cephalomedullary nails (CMN) from October 2013 to December 2017.

INTERVENTION

Short CMN.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Nail toggle and varus collapse were measured on intraoperative and final follow-up radiographs. Risk factors for nail toggle including demographics, fracture classification, quality of reduction, Dorr type, nail/canal diameter ratio, lag screw engaging the lateral cortex, and tip-apex distance (TAD) were recorded.

RESULTS

On multivariate regression analysis, shorter TAD (P = .005) and smaller nail/canal ratio (P < .001) were associated with increased nail toggle. Seven patients (10%) sustained nail toggle >4 degrees. They had a smaller nail/canal ratio (0.54 vs 0.74, P < .001), more commonly Dorr C (57% vs 14%, P = .025), lower incidence of lag screw engaging the lateral cortex (29% vs 73%, P = .026), shorter TAD (13.4 mm vs 18.5 mm, P = .042), and greater varus collapse (6.2 degrees vs 1.3 degrees, P < .001) compared to patients with nail toggle < 4 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower percentage nail fill of the canal and shorter TAD are risk factors for increased nail toggle in short CMNs. Increased nail toggle is associated with increased varus collapse.Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Early prediction of implant failures in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with single-screw cephalomedullary nailing fixation

OBJECTIVE

The implant failures of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) after single-screw cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) were multifactorially associated with various related factors. However, a comprehensive scoring system for the early prediction of implant failures is still lacking. Thus, this study aims to establish a quantification scoring system (QSS) and verify whether the QSS is reliable for predicting implant failures in geriatric ITF patients.

METHODS

We established the QSS of geriatric ITF with single-screw cephalomedullary nailing within three days after surgery. The QSS included eight points totally at eight parameters, including bone quality, fracture type, reduction quality, and internal fixation placement. Then we retrospectively analyzed seventy-seven ITF (seventy-six patients) with surgical treatment between October 2016 and July 2020 in our hospital to verify whether the QSS scoring is suitable for predicting implant failures in ITF patients.

RESULTS

Implant failures were in fifteen fractures (fifteen patients), including six cases of cut-out, eight of pending cut-out, and one of cut-through. There were three cases with 2 points in QSS, three with 3 points, five with 4 points, four with 5 points in these fifteen fractures. No fractures were with 1 point in QSS, and no implant failures when scoring over 5 points in QSS. Except for QSS scoring, no significant difference was in the collected data by binary logistic regression analysis. QSS scoring was significantly associated with implant failures (Adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 7.312; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.561 to 20.871; p < 0.001). In the analysis of Spearman's correlation, there was a strong correlation between QSS scoring and the occurrences of implant failures (RQSS = -0.964, p < 0.001). The ROC result indicated that QSS was reliable in predicting implant failures at the cut-off of 5 points (AUC (the area under the curve) = 0.944; 95% CI, 0.866 to 0.983; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The QSS is a useful early prediction of implant failures in geriatric ITF with cephalomedullary nailing fixation. QSS scoring more than 5 points can effectively reduce the risk of implant failures.

Zimmer Natural Nail and ELOS nails in pertrochanteric fractures

BACKGROUND

Pertrochanteric fractures of the femur in the elderly are very common. As the average age of the population increases, the incidence of such fractures also raises, resulting in high healthcare costs. The type of surgical devices employed for their surgical management influences these costs.

METHODS

A comparative clinical study was conducted on patients operated by one single surgeon between December 2018 and November 2020 in a high-volume regional referral centre. All patients who received a Zimmer Natural Nail (ZNN) or ELOS devices were included.

RESULTS

In 119 (66.48%) of the 179 fractures, a ZNN nail was used. Post-operatively, the TAD (tip-to-apex distance) was measured at an average value of 17.05 (4.42-41.85) mm and the CalTAD (calcar-referenced TAD) at an average of 20.76 (10.82-43.63) mm. The mean hospitalization time was 10.19 (4-22) days. In the other 60 trochanteric fractures, an ELOS nail was used. Post-operative imaging indicated a TAD of 19.65 (5.08-31.4) mm and a CalTAD of 22.86 mm (12.66-33.77). The average time of the operation was 45.82 (20-110) min. The average period of hospitalization was 10.45 (5-24) days.

CONCLUSION

Both devices give similar results in terms of short-term post-operative outcome and hospitalization. The price difference between the devices does not translate in different short-term results on the operated patients.

Screw-blade fixation systems for implant anchorage in the femoral head: Horizontal blade orientation provides superior stability

OBJECTIVES

Despite continual improvement in the methods and devices used for treatment of proximal femoral fractures, unacceptably high failure rates remain. Novel screw-blade implant systems, combining a lag screw with a blade - the latter adding rotational stability to the femoral head - offer improvement of osseous purchase, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically the head element (HE) anchorage of two screw-blade implant systems differing in blade orientation in the femoral head - vertical versus horizontal.

METHODS

Twenty paired human cadaveric femoral heads were assigned to four groups (n = 10), implanted with either Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor HE (RoSA-HE, vertical blade orientation) or Gamma3 Rotation Control Lag Screw (Gamma-RC, horizontal blade orientation) in center or off-center position, and biomechanically tested until failure under progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2 Hz.

RESULTS

Cycles to failure and failure load were significantly higher for Gamma-RC versus RoSA-HE in center position and not significantly different between them in off-center position, p = 0.03 and p = 0.22, respectively. In center position, the progression of both rotation around implant axis and varus deformation over time demonstrated superiority of the implant with horizontal versus vertical blade orientation. Compared with center positioning, off-center implant placement led to a significant decrease in stiffness, cycles to failure and failure load for Gamma-RC, but not for RoSA-HE, p < 0.01 and p = 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Horizontal blade orientation of screw-blade implant systems demonstrates better anchorage in the femoral head versus vertical blade orientation in center position. As the stability of the implant system with horizontal blade orientation drops sharply in off-center position, central insertion is its placement of choice.

Medial Calcar Comminution and Intramedullary Nail Failure in Unstable Geriatric Trochanteric Hip Fractures

Background and Objectives: An increasing global burden of geriatric hip fractures is anticipated. The appropriate treatment for fractures is of ongoing interest and becoming more relevant with an aging population and finite health resources. Trochanteric fractures constitute approximately half of all hip fractures with the medial calcar critical to fracture stability. In the management of unstable trochanteric fractures, it is assumed that intramedullary nails and longer implants will lead to less failure. However, the lack of power, inclusion of older generation femoral nails, and a variable definition of stability complicate interpretation of the literature. Materials and Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2017, a retrospective analysis of operatively treated geriatric trochanteric hip fracture patients were examined at a Level 1 Trauma Centre. The treatment was with a long and short version of one type of trochanteric nail. Unstable trochanteric fractures with medial calcar comminution were examined (AO31A2.3, 2.3 & 3.3). The length of the medial calcar loss, nail length, demographics, fracture morphology, and relevant technical factors were examined in univariate and multivariate analysis using competing risk regression analysis. The primary outcome was failure of fixation with post-operative death the competing event and powered to previously reported failure rates. Results: Unstable patterns with medial calcar comminution loss constituted 617 (56%) of operatively treated trochanteric fractures. Failure occurred in 16 (2.6%) at a median post-operative time of 111 days (40-413). In univariate and multivariate analysis, only younger age was a significant predictor of failure (years; SHR: 0.91, CI 95%: 0.86-0.96, p < 0.001). Nail length, medial calcar loss, varus reduction, and other technical factors did not influence nail failure. Conclusions: In a cohort of unstable geriatric trochanteric hip fractures with medial calcar insufficiency, only younger patient age was predictive of nail failure. Neither the length of the medial calcar fragment or nail was predictive of failure.

Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis

Background

A meta-analysis to access the pros and cons of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures including available evidence extracted from literature.

Methods

According to the Cochrane systemic analysis method, randomized control trials (RCTs) and retrospective comparative observational studies which were related to the comparison of PFNA and InterTAN nail in the treatment of the elderly with intertrochanteric fractures were retrieved. Data were independently extracted from the included studies by two reviewers and analyzed using RevMan 5.3, and the quality of the studies was assessed.

Results

Two RCTs and seven observational studies were recruited, which consisted of 681 patients with PFNA and 651 patients with InterTAN nail. The meta-analyses showed no significant differences between the two approaches on Harris Hip Score, operation time, blood loss, time to union, mean hospital stay, union problems, intraoperative complications, hematoma, infection, and other complications in both RCTs and observational studies. In terms of other outcomes, for the RCTs, results showed that there were shorter tip–apex distance and reduced pain at thigh or hip in InterTAN nail than in PFNA; however, InterTAN nail was not superior to PFNA in cutout, reoperation, and femoral shaft fracture; for observational studies, the risk of the screw migration (RR = 5.13, 95%CI [1.33,19.75], P = 0.02), cutout (RR = 3.26, 95%CI [1.64,6.47], P = 0.0008), the varus collapse of the femoral head (RR = 7.19, 95%CI [2.18,23.76], P = 0.001), femoral shaft fracture (RR = 5.73, 95%CI [2.24,14.65], P = 0.0003) treated by InterTAN nail were significantly decreased, compared with those by PFNA; however, no significant differences were observed in the aspects of tip–apex distance and pain at thigh or hip between these two groups.

Conclusion

Analysis of a large number of relevant clinical indicators available shows that InterTAN nail has better clinical manifestation than PFNA in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02031-8.

Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices

Introduction

Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and complications of patients affected by PFs treated with two intramedullary proximal femoral nails.

Materials

We enrolled 323 subjects with PFs, classified according to AO/OTA system as 31.A1 (pertrochanteric simple) and 31.A2 (pertrochanteric multifragmentary). Patients were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis devices: group A, Elos-Intrauma® nail (155 cases) and group B, Gamma 3-Stryker® nail (168 cases). Pre-operatively, the baseline characteristics of each patient (gender, age, weight and BMI) were collected. Intraoperative blood loss, subjective pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), esthetic satisfaction, functional scores of the hip by Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were noted. The post-operative degree of fracture reduction was assessed. Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Results

The study group was composed of 106 male and 217 female with an average age of 85.4 (range, 65–90, standard deviation (SD) 5.95) years. No statistical differences about sex and age distribution were noted between the two groups. Group A reported lower intraoperative blood loss, 45 ml vs 51 ml, respectively (p < 0.001). There was not any statistical difference about operative time. Group A had a better reduction of fracture (p = 0.0347). The greatest difference was detectable comparing subgroups 31.A2 (p = 0.032). There were no statistical differences about complication frequency and the overall rate was 25% (80 cases). Finally, there was no difference in terms of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC score between the two groups on each follow-up. Patients of group A showed a higher subjective satisfaction index at 1 post-operative year, 7.42 (SD 1.19) vs 6.45 (SD 1.35) of group B (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Elos® nail is a reliable device on a short-term follow-up and represents an alternative choice to the Gamma 3® nail, a well-known and appreciated system for over 25 years.

Outcome of intramedullary nailing treatment for intertrochanteric femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

The OTA/AO type 31 A3 intertrochanteric fracture has a transverse or reverse oblique fracture at the lesser trochanteric level, which accentuates the varus compressive stress in the region of the fracture and the implant. Intramedullary fixation using different types of nails is commonly preferred. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intertrochanteric femoral fractures with intramedullary nail treatment in regard to surgical procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From one level 1 trauma center, 216 consecutive adult intertrochanteric femoral fractures (OTA/AO type 31 A3) were retrospectively identified with intramedullary nail fixation from 2004 through 2013. Of these, 193 patients (58.5% female) met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 70 years (range 19-96 years).

RESULTS

Cephalomedullary nails were utilized in 176 and reconstruction nails in 17 patients. After the index procedure, 86% healed uneventfully. Nonunion development was observed in 6% and 5% had an unscheduled reoperation due to implant or fixation failure. Active smoking was reported in 16.6%. Current smokers had an increased nonunion risk compared to those who do not currently smoke (15.6% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.016). The femoral neck angle averaged 128.0° ± 5°. Fixation failure occurred in 11.1% of patients with a neck-shaft-angle < 125° compared to 2.6% (4/155) of patients with a neck-shaft angle ≥125° (p = 0.021). Patients treated with a reconstruction nail required a second surgical intervention in 23.5%, which was no different compared to 25.0% in the cephalomedullary group (p = 0.893). In the cephalomedullary group, 4.5% developed a nonunion compared to 23.5% in the reconstruction group (p = 0.002). Painful hardware led to hardware removal in 8.8%. All of them were treated with a cephalomedullary device (p = 0.180). During the last office visit, two-thirds of the patients reported no or only mild pain but most patients had reduced hip range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing is a reliable surgical technique when performed with adequate reduction. Varus reduction with a neck-shaft angle < 125° resulted in an increase in fixation failures. Patient and implant factors affected nonunion formation. Smoking increased nonunion formation. Utilization of a cephalomedullary device reduced the nonunion rate, but had higher rates of painful prominent hardware compared to reconstruction nailing.

Migration of the Lag Screw after Intramedullary Treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 Pertrochanteric Fractures Does Not Result in Higher Incidence of Cut-Outs, Regardless of Which Implant Was Used: A Comparison of Gamma Nail with and without U-Blade (RC) Lag Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

The best intramedullary nail for the treatment of unstable AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 fractures remains uncertain. A total of 237 patients (45 male, 192 female) were eligible for the assessment with an average age of 81.9 ± 10.5 years and a minimum follow-up of six months. We assessed the cut-out rate, the TAD and calTAD (Tip Apex distance) of three different implants. An overall cut-out rate of 2.5% (n = 6) was observed. The cut-out rate was 1.2% (n = 1) in the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA) group, 3.7% (n = 3) in the Gamma Nail group and 2.9% (n = 2) in the Gamma3^® with a U-Blade (RC) lag-screw group. The TAD and calTAD differed between the cut-out and non-cut group-20.0 mm vs. 18.5 mm and 13.1 mm vs. 15.3 mm, respectively. A significantly higher TAD of 32.5 mm could be seen in the cut-out after PFNA (p < 0.0001). The only significant change in follow-up using Parker's ratio was observed in the PFNA group (p < 0.0001). The rate of patients requiring surgery after complications was 8.4% (n = 20) without any significant difference between the three groups. The PFNA blade showed significant migration within the femoral head, however the cut-out rate remained the smallest compared to Gamma3 with or without additional U-Blade (RC) lag screw.