Comparative study of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance measured in two ways and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance in patients with patellofemoral instability

Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Has Better Diagnostic Reliability Than Tubercle-Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distance For Predicting Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is now routinely utilized to help determine whether a realignment procedure is necessary for patients with patellar instability. The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance has been explored as an alternative measurement. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of TT-TG and TT-PCL; to explore whether there is a relationship between the TT-PCL and the TT-TG distance; to determine whether there is a relationship between the TT-TG and TT-PCL distances and knee rotation; and to compare the abilities of the TT-PCL distance and the TT-TG distance with predicted patellar instability.

METHOD

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to September 2021 to identify clinical studies comparing TT-TG and TT-PCL distances to patellar instability. Data on patient baseline characteristics, TT-TG and TT-PCL distances, inter-observer reliability, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were recorded. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment form recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

RESULT

Twenty studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 2330 knees from 2260 patients. The current study showed that TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar observer reliability. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-TG ranged from 0.807 to 0.98 and 0.553 to 0.99, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of TT-PCL ranged from 0.553 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.981, respectively. Six studies compared the AUC for predicting patellar instability and showed that TT-TG had better predictive performance than TT-PCL. Three studies reported a correlation between TT-TG and knee rotation, but no such relationship was found for TT-PCL. Eight studies reported a weak or moderate correlation between TT-TG and TT-PCL.

CONCLUSION

TT-TG and TT-PCL have similar inter- and intra-rater reliability (as measured by ICC), but TT-TG has greater discriminatory power to predict patellar instability than TT-PCL (as measured by AUC values and odds ratio). However, considering trochlear dysplasia and individual variations, future studies need to find more accurate and individualized methods to predict patellar instability.

Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance versus tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance for predicting patellar instability: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance versus tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, and to determine cutoff values of these measurements for pathological diagnosis in the context of patellar instability.

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to October 5, 2022 for literature outlining comparisons between TT-TG and TT-PCL in patellar instability patients. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity, as well as odds ratios, cutoff values for pathological diagnosis and correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies in order to perform a quality assessment of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 2839 patients (2922 knees) were included in this review. Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.98 and 0.55 to 0.99 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. Intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.99 and 0.88 to 0.98 for TT-TG and TT-PCL, respectively. AUC measuring diagnostic accuracy of patellar instability for TT-TG ranged from 0.80 to 0.84 and 0.58 to 0.76 for TT-PCL. Five studies found TT-TG to have more discriminatory power than TT-PCL at distinguishing patients with patellar instability from patients who do not. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 21 to 85% and 62 to 100%, respectively, for TT-TG. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 30 to 76% and 46 to 86%, respectively, for TT-PCL. Odds ratio values ranged from 1.06 to 14.02 for TT-TG and 0.98 to 6.47 for TT-PCL. Proposed cutoff TT-TG and TT-PCL values for predicting patellar instability ranged from 15.0 to 21.4 mm and 19.8 to 28.0 mm, respectively. Eight studies reported significant positive correlations between TT-TG and TT-PCL.

CONCLUSION

TT-TG resulted in overall similar reliability, sensitivity and specificity as TT-PCL; however, TT-TG has better diagnostic accuracy than TT-PCL in the context of patellar instability as per AUC and odds ratio values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients with patellar dislocation were not equivalent but could be interchangeable

PURPOSE

To compare the values and the relationship of tibial tubercle lateralization measurements between computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Sixty patients with patellar dislocation who underwent both CT and MRI of the same knee joint from November 2021 to February 2022 were included in our study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to evaluate the reliability of tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA), and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance measurements. The values of CT and MRI measurements using the same bony landmarks were compared for the difference. Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to assess the correlation between CT and MRI measurements. Finally, the estimated values obtained from the regression equation were compared with the actual values obtained from the radiological measurement to evaluate the accuracy of the equations.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with patellar dislocation who underwent both CT and MRI of the same knee joint were included in this study. The included measurements showed excellent agreement with ICCs > 0.9. TT-TG distance measured on CT (19.5 ± 5.1 mm) had a mean of 7.1 mm higher than that on MRI (12.4 ± 4.7 mm) (P < 0.001). The mean value of TT-RA distance was 22.5 ± 3.7 mm on CT and 16.7 ± 4.9 mm on MRI (P < 0.001), showing a mean difference of 5.8 mm. The values of TT-TG distance measured by CT and MRI were significantly correlated (R = 0.5, P < 0.001). The values of TT-RA distance between these two modalities showed a better correlation than that of TT-TG distance (R = 0.6, P < 0.001). The interchange values of TT-TG distance and TT-RA distance between CT and MRI can be obtained using regression equations (TT-TG distance: y = 0.6x + 12.3; TT-RA distance: y = 0.5x + 14.4).

CONCLUSION

The values of tibial tubercle lateralization measured by MRI may be underestimated compared with those measured by CT. Although the values measured on CT and MRI are not equivalent, the value in the other modality can be estimated. Therefore, an additional CT scan for tibial tubercle lateralization evaluation may not be necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Assessment of the reliability and validity of imaging measurements for patellofemoral instability: an updated systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on the reliability and validity of all radiological measures used to assess patients presenting with patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

A search of the CINHAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases and the Cochrane library was conducted. All studies assessing the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of radiological measures of the patellofemoral joints of patients with patellofemoral instability from 2010 onwards were considered for inclusion. Discrimination validity, inter- and intra-observer reliability, and the sensitivity and specificity of specific imaging measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three studies met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. We identified eight radiological measures in four categories with good reliability and validity: the tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance, specific measures of patellar height (Blackburne-Peel index, Caton-Deschamps index and Insall-Salvati ratios), three measures of trochlear dysplasia (sulcus angle, trochlear depth, and lateral trochlear inclination), and the tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance. No included studies examined the reliability and validity of patellofemoral instability ultrasound measures.

CONCLUSION

Our updated review demonstrated good inter- and intra-observer reliability and discrimination validity for the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, specific patellar height, and trochlear dysplasia measures on MRI. The tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament distance, an indirect measure of rotational asymmetry, was a valid and reliable measure on MRI. Due to a lack of assessments across more than one study, there are a variety of proposed measures with insufficient evidence to determine their validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle-Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

The tibial tubercle (TT)–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance has low reproducibility in patients with a dysplastic trochlea, whereas the clinical value of the TT–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance remains controversial.

Purposes:

To establish a method to assess the position of the TT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the TT–Roman arch (TT-RA) distance, compare this method with the TT-TG and TT-PCL distance, and provide the pathological threshold value of the TT-RA distance in patients with patellar dislocation.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

The TT-RA distance, TT-TG distance, and TT-PCL distance were measured on MRI scans in 70 patients with a history of patellar dislocation and 70 healthy individuals. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of each measurement parameter were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity and the interrelationship of the 3 measurement parameters were investigated using Pearson correlation and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The pathological threshold values of these measurements were calculated according to the data of healthy individuals. Finally, logistic regression analysis was performed using these values.

Results:

Patients with patellar dislocation had a greater TT-RA distance compared with healthy individuals (18.05 ± 4.16 vs 13.86 ± 2.90 mm; P < .001). The TT-RA distance had a stronger diagnostic capacity, with an area under the curve of 0.802 compared with 0.625 for TT-PCL distance. Excellent reproducibility was seen for TT-RA distance measurement at any degree of trochlear dysplasia (all intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] >0.90). The inter- and intraobserver ICCs of the TT-TG distance measurements were extremely low for Dejour type D dysplasia (ICC, 0.509 and 0.616, respectively). The pathological TT-RA distance threshold was calculated as 19.5 mm. Logistic regression showed that patients with a TT-RA distance >19.5 mm were 11.7 times more likely to sustain patellar dislocation than were those with TT-RA distance less than this value.

Conclusion:

The TT-RA distance was a more reliable parameter with which to evaluate TT position than was TT-TG distance in patients with trochlear dysplasia. The TT-PCL distance was the least reliable among the 3 parameters studied.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patellofemoral Morphometry Reveals Age and Gender Variations in the Knees of Children and Adolescents

Background: The morphology and alignment of the patellofemoral joint are crucial risk factors for patellar instability, and the incidence of acute primary patellar dislocation is the highest in women in their second decade of life. The purpose of the study was to analyze age and gender variations of the patellofemoral joint using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 852 patients aged between 4 and 18 years with a history of knee MRI examinations were screened for eligibility and 663 patients (470 males, 193 females) were included. Patients were divided into groups according to age and sex. The age group was divided into five groups (Group 1, 4–6 years; Group 2, 7–9 years; Group 3, 10–12 years; Group 4, 13–15 years; and Group 5, 16–18 years). Three orthopaedic surgeons measured MRI parameters reflecting the patellofemoral morphology (sulcus angle, lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear facet symmetry, and femoral depth) and alignment (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance, percent sulcus location, and percent tibia tuberosity location). Results: Parameters including tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance, sulcus angle, percent tibial tuberosity location, trochlear facet symmetry, and femoral depth showed significant differences between the age groups (p < 0.05). The sulcus angle decreased fin Group 2, and the femoral depth showed an increasing trend with aging in male patients. However, the sulcus angle in females decreased first and then increased in Group 3 as the inflection point. The femoral depth showed an opposite pattern. Conclusions: Patellofemoral morphometry showed age and gender variation. Notably, the sulcus angle and femoral depth were significantly different between males and females and changed according to the development. These findings may reflect the sex difference and peak incidence of the patellar instability risk. Understanding the morphological changes and differences of the patellofemoral joint may facilitate the diagnosis of patellofemoral pathologies.

Morphological study of the vastus medialis oblique in recurrent patellar dislocation based on magnetic resonance images

Background

To investigate the morphological parameters of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) muscle and delineate its importance in the maintenance of patellofemoral joint stability.

Methods

The magnetic resonance imaging data of seventy-five knees (fifty-four patients) with recurrent lateral patella dislocation (LPD) and seventy-five knees (seventy patients) without recurrent LPD were retrospectively analysed. Five morphological parameters related to the VMO (elevation in the sagittal plane and coronal plane, craniocaudal extent, muscle-fibre angulation, cross-sectional area ratio) and two patella tilt parameters (patella tilt angle, bisect offset ratio) were measured in MR images. The independent-samples t test or chi-square test was used for statistical comparisons.

Results

The mean ages of the patients in the recurrent LPD group and control group were 22.1 ± 9.9 years and 24.0 ± 6.5 years, respectively. Eighteen out of seventy-five (24%) patients MRI showed VMO injuries. Compared with the control group, the patients with recurrent LPD showed significantly higher sagittal VMO elevation (10.4 ± 2.3 mm vs. 4.1 ± 1.9 mm), coronal VMO elevation (15.9 ± 5.7 mm vs. 3.9 ± 3.7 mm), muscle-fibre angulation (35.4 ± 8.0° vs. 27.9 ± 6.3°), patella tilt angle (25.9 ± 10.7° vs. 9.1 ± 5.2°), and bisect offset ratio values (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.1) and significantly lower craniocaudal extent (13.7 ± 5.3 mm vs. 16.7 ± 5.1 mm) and cross-sectional area ratio values (0.05 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02).

Conclusions

The results showed that abnormalities in the VMO and patella tilt were clearly present in recurrent LPD patients compared with normal people.