How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients' satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty

Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal sagittal alignment of the femoral prosthesis is critical to the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy, the efficacy of default femoral alignment versus individualized alignment remains under scrutiny. This study aimed to compare the differences in prosthetic alignment, anatomical restoration, and clinical outcomes between individualized femoral sagittal alignment and default sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted TKA.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised controlled trial, 113 patients (120 knees) underwent robotic-assisted TKA were divided into two groups: 61 with individualized femoral flexion (individualized alignment group) and 59 with default 3-5° flexion (default alignment group). The individualized alignment was based on the distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA), defined as the angle between the mechanical and distal anatomical axes of the femur. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Despite similar postoperative femoral flexion angles between groups (P = 0.748), the individualized alignment group exhibited significantly lower incidences of femoral prosthesis extension and higher rates of optimal 0-3° prosthesis flexion (9.8% vs. 27.1%, P = 0.014,78.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.008, respectively). The individualized alignment group also demonstrated more favourable changes in sagittal anatomy, with higher maintenance of postoperative anterior femoral offset within 1 mm (54.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.026) and posterior condylar offset within 1 mm and 2 mm (44.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.031,73.8% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.010, respectively). Although slight improvement in the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) at three months was observed (P = 0.045), it did not reach a minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

Individualized tailoring of femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances prosthetic alignment and anatomical restoration, suggesting potential improvements in postoperative outcomes.

Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures

BACKGROUND

Tibial plateau fractures, which are intra-articular injuries of the knee joint, are often difficult to treat and have a high complication rate, including early-onset osteoarthritis. The most common treatment for complex tibial plateau fractures is surgical fixation. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons often use bone defect fillers to address bone defects caused by the injury. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method of fixation and on whether bone defect fillers are necessary.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different surgical interventions and bone defect fillers for treating tibial plateau fractures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries up to March 2023. We also searched conference proceedings and the grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing surgical interventions for treating tibial plateau fractures and different types of filler for bone defects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened search results, selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcomes (and the specific measures we considered most relevant) were generic quality of life (general health score in the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)), patient-reported lower limb function (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score), and adverse events (frequency of unplanned reoperation). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 trials in the review, with a total of 948 adult participants. Nine trials compared different types of fixation, and six trials evaluated different types of bone graft substitutes. All 15 trials were small and at high risk of bias. We considered most available evidence to be of very low certainty, meaning we have very little confidence in the results. Only limited pooling was possible. One trial compared circular fixation combined with insertion of percutaneous screws (hybrid fixation) versus standard open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 82 people with open or closed Schatzker types V or VI tibial plateau fractures. At 24 months' follow-up, hybrid fixation compared with ORIF may have little or no effect on SF-36 general health score (MD 6 points higher, 95% CI 7.7 points lower to 19.7 points higher; 66 participants), patient-reported lower limb function according to the HSS score (MD 7 points higher, 95% CI 2.4 points lower to 16.4 points higher; 66 participants), or frequency of unplanned reoperation (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.32; 83 fractures (82 participants)). However, the evidence for all three outcomes is very uncertain. Three trials (with 242 participants) compared single-plating ORIF versus double-plating ORIF. There may be little to know difference in patient-reported lower limb function (HSS score) at 24 months' follow-up in people who undergo single-plating ORIF compared with those who undergo double-plating ORIF (MD 0.2 points higher, 95% CI 2.12 points lower to 2.52 points higher; 1 study, 84 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. There were no data for quality of life or unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up. Six trials (including 368 participants) compared bone substitute versus autologous bone graft (autograft) for managing bone defects. No trials reported SF-36 general health score, HSS score, or frequency of unplanned reoperation at 24 months' follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to ascertain the best method of fixation or the best method of addressing bone defects during surgery in people with tibial plateau fractures. Further well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Local Infiltration Analgesia Is Superior to Regional Nerve Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Less Falls, Better Mobility, and Same-Day Discharge

Background: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. Results: A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group (p < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU (p < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate (p = 0.029), fewer falls (p = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge (p < 0.001) than RNB. Conclusions: In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.

Capability After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Strongly Associated With Preoperative Symptoms of Depression

BACKGROUND

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to improve the level of capability (ability to perform valued life activities) associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, some evidence suggests a substantial proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes after this procedure. We sought to better understand the association between mental health, specifically symptoms of depression, with postoperative outcomes. Symptoms of depression are shown to be common among orthopaedic populations in general and can be briefly and conveniently evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in a less burdensome manner compared with longer mental health surveys. This study assesses the association between preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-2) and levels of capability at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 114 patients with knee OA across five clinics in California and Texas scheduled for TKA. Participants completed a preoperative PHQ-2 and Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) survey at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. We analyzed these data using bivariate and multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Preoperative PHQ-2 scores were significantly associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. Latino/Hispanic race was also associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks. The association between preoperative depressive symptoms and level of capability after TKA were more pronounced at 6 months compared with 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative symptoms of depression are strongly associated with reduced capability after TKA and can be screened for using the PHQ-2-a brief tool that can be feasibly incorporated into clinical workflows. User-friendly assessment of depressive symptoms can assist orthopaedic surgeons in identifying and addressing mental health at the outset during the management of knee OA.

Arthroscopic Debridement of Mild and Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis Results in Clinical Improvement at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I and II (mild) and III (moderate) knee osteoarthritis (OA) at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

A systematic review of primary literature was performed in concordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies regarding arthroscopic debridement/chondroplasty for management of knee OA at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Studies were included if they included KL grades I to III or dichotomized clinical outcomes by KL grade. The primary outcome was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the final follow-up. Bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score.

RESULTS

Eight studies including a total of 773 patients met inclusion criteria (range of patients in each study, 31-214). Mean age of patients ranged from 35.5 to 64 years, with most studies having a mean patient age of 55 to 65 years. Mean follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 10 years. Seven of the 8 (87.5%) studies reported good to excellent PROMs at a minimum 1- to 4-year follow-up after arthroscopic debridement. Improvements in PROMs were superior in patients with less severe knee OA (KL I-II) in comparison to KL III in most studies. Conversion to arthroplasty ranged from 7.6% to 50% in KL III patients compared with 0% to 4.5% in KL I-II patients after arthroscopic debridement. Two of the 3 studies with at least a 4-year clinical follow-up reported that clinical improvements diminished with time (improvements no longer significant in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score). The lone randomized controlled trial was the only investigation that did not find a benefit of arthroscopic debridement over quality nonoperative care. MINORS scores ranged from 6 to 10 (mean, 8.0) for the 5 nonrandomized studies without controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic debridement for the management of mild to moderate knee OA is effective at short-term follow-up in patients who have exhausted conservative care. There is limited evidence demonstrating the durability of improvement following arthroscopic debridement after 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

High survivorship rate and good clinical outcomes after high tibial osteotomy in patients with radiological advanced medial knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The role of valgus producing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) is still controversial. The aim of the current systematic review was to assess survivorship and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of high tibial osteotomy in patients with radiological advanced medial knee OA.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE database was performed in July 2023 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify studies investigating the survivorship rate and PROMs of valgus-producing high tibial osteotomy in patients with advanced knee OA at x-ray assessment in the medial compartment at minimum-two-years follow up. Advanced radiological OA was defined as Kellgren Lawrence (K-L) ≥ 3 or Ahlbäch ≥ 2. Survivorship was defined as percentage of patients free of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at follow-up. Clinical interpretation of provided PROMs were performed according to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) target values reported in literature. Survivorship data and PROMs scores were extracted, and studies were stratified based on selected study features. The quality of included studies was assessed with modified Coleman score.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies, totalling 1296 knees with a mean age between 46.9 and 67 years old, were included. Average survivorship was of 74.6% (range 60 - 98.1%) at 10-years follow up. The subjective scoring systems showed good results according to MCID and PASS, and postoperative improvements were partially maintained until final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

HTO is worth considering as treatment choice even in patients affected by radiological advanced medial knee osteoarthritis. Long term survivorship and good patient reported clinical outcomes could be expected in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; systematic review of level III-IV studies.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves implant position and early functional recovery for the knee with severe varus/valgus deformity

PURPOSE

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA) facilitates precise bone resection and lower limb alignment, yet accuracy and functional recovery for severe varus/valgus deformity is not well-documented. The aim of study was to investigate whether r-TKA improves implant alignment in the coronal and sagittal view and early functional recovery compared to conventional TKA(c-TKA).

METHODS

This comparative study included 86 patients with symptomatic knee arthritis who underwent primary TKA at our institution between 1st May and 31th November 2021. Radiological parameters evaluated included hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), femoral varus-valgus angle (FVVA), tibial varus-valgus angle (TVVA), posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), posterior condylar offset ratio, and Insall-Salvati index. Operative time, stay length, and complications were reviewed from patient records. The hospital for special surgery (HSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and knee joint motion range were evaluated at the six-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The c-TKA and r-TKA groups had no significant differences in HKAA (179.73 ± 3.76°, range: 172.10-188.90° vs. 180.53 ± 2.91°, range: 173.30-188.32°, p = 0.277), FVVA (96.13 ± 2.61°, range: 90.27-101.52° vs. 96.38 ± 2.23°, range: 90.98-100.95°, p = 0.636), and TVVA (88.74 ± 2.03°, range: 83.75-92.74° vs. 89.43 ± 1.83°, range: 85.32-94.15°, p = 1.000). Outlier of mechanical alignment incidence (> 3°) was significantly lower in r-TKA compared with c-TKA, 17.50% (7/40) vs. 41.30% (19/46), (p = 0.017). PTSA of r-TKA remained significantly lower than c-TKA (p = 0.009) in mild-deformity patients. For severe varus/valgus deformity, r-TKA had a significantly lesser HKAA-outlier incidence (p = 0.025), PTSA-outlier incidence (p = 0.019), and lower PTSA (p < 0.001) compared with c-TKA. The r-TKA functional outcome was better than c-TKA regarding HSS (93.12 ± 1.97, range: 90-95, 95%CI:92.11-94.13 vs. 91.33 ± 2.50, range: 85-95, 95%CI:90.20-92.69, p = 0.036), and VAS (0.24 ± 0.44, range:0-1 vs. 0.72 ± 0.75, range:0-2, p = 0.026), knee joint flexion (118.53° ± 8.06, range: 105-130°, 95%CI:114.39-122.67° vs. 112.22 ± 8.09°, range: 100-130°, 95%CI:108.20-116.24° ,p = 0.027) for severe varus/valgus deformity.

CONCLUSION

r-TKA improved lower-limb coronal alignment, sagittal implant position, and early functional recovery for patients with severe varus/valgus deformity of the knee. r-TKA did not confer substantial advantages over c-TKA in both radiological and clinical outcomes for the mild varus/valgus deformity.

Patella scores are similar both with gap balancing and measured resection after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized single-centre study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare femoral component rotation (FCR) values when adjusted with 'gap balancing' (GB) and 'measured resection' (MR) techniques following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study hypothesis was that the GB technique would be better on FCR than MR in TKA.

METHODS

From a total of 93 unilateral TKAs performed between August 2019 and November 2020, the FCR values were adjusted by GB in 46 cases and MR in 47. Post-TKA magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied for FCR assessment. Orthoroentgenograms and lateral knee radiographs were taken to determine the mechanical axis and posterior condylar offset (PCO) ratio, respectively. Both groups were compared radiologically. The Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patella scores were calculated and compared between the groups preoperatively and at the end of 6 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups in respect of the demographic data. The mean HSS patella score was 86.4 ± 4.1 in the GB group and 84.6 ± 3.8 in the MR group in the 2nd year (p = 0.047). A higher degree of external rotation in the FC was determined in the GB group [2.2° (1.7°-4.3°)] compared to the MR group [1.7° (0.8°-3.0°)] (p = 0.009). The postoperative increase in PCO ratio was higher in the GB group (p = 0.005). All other variables were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that at the end of the 2nd year, the HSS patella scores were better, FCs were more externally rotated and PCO ratios were higher in TKAs using the GB technique. However, taking into account that the difference between the 2nd year HSS patella scores was too small to be considered clinically significant, it was shown that both the GB and MR techniques can be used for FCR in clinical practice without any hesitation.

Excessive femoral torsion is not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability if TKA is functionally aligned and the patella denervated

PURPOSE

Recent data suggest that individual morphologic factors should be respected to restore preoperative patellofemoral alignment and thus reduce the likelihood of anterior knee pain. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of excessive femoral torsion (FT) on clinical outcome of TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA and complete preoperative radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were included. 51 patients showed increased FT of > 20° and were matched for age/sex to 51 controls (FT < 20°). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight matched pairs were compared after a 2 year follow-up clinically (Kujala and patellofemoral score for TKA) and radiographically (FT, frontal leg axis, TT-TG, patellar thickness, patellar tilt, and lateral displacement of patella). Functional alignment of TKA was performed (hybrid-technique). All patellae were denervated but no patella was resurfaced.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between clinical scores two years after surgery between patients with normal and excessive FT (n.s.). Kujala score was 64.3 ± 16.7 versus 64.8 ± 14.4 (n.s.), and patellofemoral score for TKA was 74.3 ± 21 versus 78.5 ± 20.7 (n.s.) for increased FT group and control group, respectively. There was no correlation between preoperative FT and clinical scores. Other radiographic parameters were similar between both groups. No correlations between clinical outcomes and preoperative/postoperative frontal leg axis or total leg axis correction were found (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

If the leg axis deformity is corrected to a roughly neutral alignment during cemented TKA, including patellar denervation, then excessive FT was not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study, level II.

Comparison of Survival Rate between Posterior-Stabilized and Constrained Condylar Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Analysis

Background

Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is a technically demanding procedure for failed primary TKA. Posterior-stabilized (PS) and constrained condylar knee (CCK) articulations are commonly used for RTKA, but comparison of these articulations in RTKA is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare survival rates and clinical outcomes of RTKAs using PS articulation and CCK articulation.

Methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 86 RTKAs (PS, n = 41; CCK, n = 45) with a mean follow-up of 9.15 ± 2.79 years. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society Score, and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-hazard progression model.

Results

Clinical outcomes were improved in both groups without significant difference. Twelve patients had orthopedic complications (4 in PS group and 8 in CCK group). Eight of them underwent re-RTKA (3 in PS group and 5 in CCK group). The articulation design did not influence the failure. The estimated 10-year survival rate was 92.7% in the PS group and 88.2% in the CCK group with no significant difference (p = 0.60). Also in septic failure, there was no significant difference in survival rate (92.7% in PS group and 92.5% in CCK group, p = 0.87). The hazard ratio in the PS group was not significantly different (p = 0.607).

Conclusions

In RTKA, both PS and CCK showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.2 years. Implant articulation did not affect the outcomes when properly indicated.

There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used to assess the impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on patients. However, mere statistical comparison of PROMs is not sufficient to assess the value of TKA to the patient, especially given the risk profile of arthroplasty. Evaluation of treatment effect sizes is important to support the use of an intervention; this is often quantified with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). MCIDs are unique to specific PROMs, as they vary by calculation methodology and study population. Therefore, a systematic review of calculated MCID values, their respective ranges, and assessment of their applications is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in TKA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review of MCID calculations and reporting in primary TKA, we asked: (1) What are the most frequently reported PROM MCIDs and their reported ranges in TKA? (2) What proportion of studies report distribution- versus anchor-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which these MCID values are derived for anchor-based values? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR) compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception through March 2022 for TKA articles reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent reviewers screened articles for eligibility, including any article that calculated new MCID values for PROMs after primary TKA, and extracted these data for analysis. Overall, 576 articles were identified, 38 of which were included in the final analysis. These studies had a total of 710,128 patients with a median age of 67.7 years and median BMI of 30.9 kg/m 2 . Women made up more than 50% of patients in most studies, and the median follow-up period was 17 months (range 0.25 to 72 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the Jadad criteria for one randomized controlled trial (3 of 5 ideal global score) and the modified Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (mean 17.2 ± 1.8) and noncomparative studies (mean 9.6 ± 1.3). There were 49 unique PROMs for which 233 MCIDs were reported. Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test given non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were the most frequently reported MCID value, comprising 9% (22 of 233) and 9% (22 of 233), respectively. The composite Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the next most frequently reported (9% [21 of 233]), followed by the WOMAC composite score (6% [13 of 233]). The median anchor-based values for WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were 23 (IQR 16 to 33) and 25 (IQR 14 to 31), while the median distribution-based values were 11 (IQR 10.8 to 11) and 22 (IQR 17 to 23), respectively. The median anchor-based MCID value for the OKS was 6 (IQR 4 to 7), while the distribution-based value was 7 (IQR 5 to 10). Thirty-nine percent (15 of 38) used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 32% (12 of 38) used a distribution-based technique. Twenty-nine percent of studies (11 of 38) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing patient satisfaction, pain relief, or quality of life along a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (40% [16 of 40]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (25% [10 of 40]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, all articles used a measure of study population variance in their derivation of the MCID, with the most common method reported as one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (45% [14 of 31]). Most reported median MCID values (15 of 19) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05) apart from the WOMAC Function component score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Activities of Daily Living subscores.

CONCLUSION

Despite variability of MCIDs for each PROM, there is consistency in the methodology by which MCID values have been derived in published studies. Additionally, there is a consensus about MCID values regardless of calculation method across most of the PROMs we evaluated.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given their importance to treatment selection and patient safety, authors and journals should report MCID values with greater consistency. We recommend using a 7-point increase as the MCID for the OKS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculation, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using a 10-point to 15-point increase for the MCID of composite WOMAC, as the median value was 12 (IQR 10 to 17) with no difference between calculation methods. We recommend use of median reported values for WOMAC function and pain subscores: 21 (IQR 15 to 33) and 23 (IQR 13 to 29), respectively.

Outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted lateral tibial plateau fixation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and summarize the current literature on outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted tibial plateau fixation (AATPF) when applied for only lateral tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of nine databases was conducted: ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library via Wiley, Embase and MEDLINE via Ovid, Global Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, and Web of Science Core Collection. The study was performed in concordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible for inclusions included Schatzker I-III lateral tibial plateau fractures with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Data extraction was performed by two authors independently using a predesigned form.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies, 7 prospective and 10 retrospective, including 565 patients (age 15-82 years old) treated with AATPF were included in this review with follow-up ranging from 6 to 138 months. All 10 studies that used categorical functional outcomes demonstrated excellent/very good or good outcomes in > 90% of patients. When compared to patients managed with the traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), patients treated with AATPF had statistically significantly better range of motion mean difference [5.21° (95% CI - 2.50 to 12.92, p < 0.0001)], lower blood loss [66.19 mL (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.54-99.84 mL, p < 0.0001)], shorter hospital stay [- 1.41 days (95% CI - 3.39 to 0.58 days, p < 0.0001)], better Hospital Special Surgery score [11.31 (95% CI 6.49-16.12, p < 0.0001)], and higher Rasmussen radiographic score [1.26 (95% CI - 0.72 to 3.23, p < 0.0001)].

CONCLUSION

AATPF is a promising treatment of lateral tibial plateau fractures with some advantages over the traditional ORIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.