Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study

Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Objective

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of three different fixation methods in treating femoral neck fractures in young patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 young patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent surgical treatment. Among them, 16, 12, and 7 patients underwent fixation with three cannulated compression screws (3CS), the femoral neck system (FNS), and the compound compression system (CCS), respectively. Data, including fracture classification, injury-to-surgery time, surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy instances, fracture healing time, complications, and Harris score at the final follow-up, were collected and analyzed to compare clinical outcomes among the three fixation methods.

Results

All patients were followed for at least 6 months, exhibiting no significant differences in age, gender, injury side, fracture type, or injury-to-operation time among the three groups (P > 0.05). The FNS and CCS groups exhibited shorter operation durations and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy instances compared to the 3CS group (P < 0.01). Despite the minimally invasive nature of 3CS, the FNS and CCS groups experienced higher intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01). During follow-up, only one patient with 3CS fixation developed nonunion. Additionally, patients treated with 3CS demonstrated a higher incidence of femoral head necrosis and severe femoral neck shortening than the FNS and CCS groups. Excluding patients with combined nonunion, no significant difference in mean fracture healing time was observed among the three groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the FNS and CCS groups showed higher Harris scores (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both FNS and CCS are effective internal fixation systems for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients, yielding more satisfactory clinical functional outcomes than 3CS. Comparatively, the CCS system presents a higher risk of iatrogenic rotation of the proximal fracture segment. Therefore, we advocate the insertion of two to three 2.5 mm Kirschner wires from the upper edge of the femoral neck along the axial direction before CCS lag screw insertion to resist iatrogenic rotational stress.

Preliminary clinical and radiological evaluation of osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS) for subcapital fractures of the femur

Addressing subcapital fractures of the femur poses a substantial clinical challenge, complicated by the diverse range of available osteosynthesis materials. This study is dedicated to a comprehensive analysis of the clinical and radiological implications linked with the implementation of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) in osteosynthesis procedures. A descriptive study was conducted involving patients who underwent osteosynthesis for subcapital fractures of the femur utilizing the FNS during the period from 2019 to 2022. The investigation encompassed various facets, including the classification of fractures according to the Garden and Pauwells classifications, criteria for achieving precise reduction based on the Garden criteria and Tip Apex Distance (TAD). At the one-year follow-up, factors such as fracture consolidation, loss of reduction, fracture collapse, complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated utilizing the Harris Hip Score (HHS) scale. The study cohort included a total of 26 patients, among whom 22 exhibited non-displaced subcapital femur fractures categorized as Garden I and II. Successful reduction was accomplished in 23 cases, in which 24 cases (92.3%) displayed a TAD measurement below 25 mm. According to the HHS, patients achieved an average score of 90.9 (ranging from 63 to 100) following the surgical intervention, with predominantly "excellent" and "good" outcomes. The outcomes derived from our investigation corroborate the viability of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) as a reliable option for osteosynthesis in femoral neck fractures. The results obtained are comparable to those achieved with other available implants, as highlighted by previous studies.

Comparison of femoral neck shortening after femoral neck system and cannulated cancellous screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of femoral neck shortening between the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) for displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 225 patients aged 18-65 years with displaced femoral neck fracture were divided into two groups according to internal fixation: 135 patients in the FNS group and 90 patients in the CCS group. The length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, quality of reduction, extent of femoral neck shortening, incidence of femoral neck shortening, femoral neck shortening at each follow-up visit, Harris hip score (HHS), reoperation, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 28.2 (26.0, 31.2) months in the FNS group and 30.2 (26.3, 34.7) months in the CCS group. The follow-up time, age, sex distribution, body mass index (BMI), mechanism of injury, injured side, length of hospital stay, time from injury to surgery, and fracture classification were similar between the groups. Duration of surgery was longer in the FNS group (65.0 (55.0, 87.0) min versus 55.0 (50.0, 65.0) min, P<0.001); intraoperative blood loss was greater in the FNS group (50.0 (20.0, 60.0) ml versus 20.0 (10.0, 35.0) ml, P<0.001). Femoral neck shortening was 2.4 (1.0, 4.5) mm in the FNS group versus 0.6 (0.0, 2.6) mm in the CCS group at 1 month postoperatively (P<0.001); 3.7 (1.8, 6.4) mm in the FNS group versus 1.2 (0.6, 3.8) mm in the CCS group at 3 months (P<0.001); 4.1(2.4, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.3 (1.1, 4.4) mm in the CCS group at 6 months (P<0.001); 4.2 (2.6, 7.7) mm in the FNS group versus 2.6 (1.3, 4.6) mm in the CCS group at 12 months (P<0.001); and 4.5 (2.8, 8.0) mm in the FNS group versus 2.8 (1.5, 4.8) mm in the CCS group at 18 months (P<0.001). The two groups showed no significant differences in HHS, reoperation, and reduction quality.

CONCLUSION

Compared to CCS, FNS is deficient in preventing femoral neck shortening. Future research should focus on improving FNS in terms of preventing femoral neck shortening.

Biomechanical changes in the proximal femur before and after removal of femoral neck system

BACKGROUND

As an innovative internal fixation system, FNS (femoral neck system) is increasingly being utilized by surgeons for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. At present, there have been numerous finite element analysis experiments studying the immediate stability of FNS and CSS in treating femoral neck fractures. However, there is scarce mechanical analysis available regarding the effects post internal fixation removal. This study aimed to investigate the alterations in mechanical parameters of the proximal femur before and after the removal of FNS (femoral neck system), and to assess potential distinctions in indicators following the extraction of CSS (Cannulated Screws).

METHODS

A proximal femur model was reconstructed using finite element numerical techniques. The models for CSS and FNS were formulated utilizing characteristics and parametric definitions. The internal fixation was combined with a normal proximal femur model to simulate the healing state after fracture surgery. Within the framework of static analysis, consistent stress burdens were applied across the entirety of the models. The total deformation and equivalent stress of the proximal femur were recorded before and after the removal of internal fixation.

RESULTS

Under the standing condition, the total deformation of the model before and after removing CSS was 0.99 mm and 1.10 mm, respectively, indicating an increase of 12%. The total deformation of the model before and after removing FNS was 0.65 mm and 0.76 mm, respectively, indicating an increase of 17%. The equivalent stress for CSS and FNS were 55.21 MPa and 250.67 MPa, respectively. The average equivalent stress on the cross-section of the femoral neck before and after removal of CSS was 7.76 MPa and 6.11 MPa, respectively. The average equivalent stress on the cross-section of the femoral neck before and after removal of FNS was 9.89 MPa and 8.79 MPa, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The retention of internal fixation may contribute to improved stability of the proximal femur. However, there still existed risks of stress concentration in internal fixation and stress shielding in the proximal femur. Compared to CSS, the removal of FNS results in larger bone tunnels and insufficient model stability. Further clinical interventions are recommended to address this issue.

Pre-sliding technique to improve femoral neck system against the shortening: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of using pre-sliding technique to prevent postoperative shortening of displaced femoral neck fracture fixed with femoral neck system (FNS).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 110 cases of displaced femoral neck fracture treated with femoral neck system from September 2019 to November 2022 in our center, which were divided into 56 cases in the pre-sliding group and 54 cases in the traditional group. The baseline data such as gender, age, side, mechanism of injury, fracture type, operation time, intraoperative bleeding were recorded and compared between the two groups, and the quality of fracture reduction, shortening distance, Tip Apex Distance (TAD), union time, Harris score of the hip were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The TAD value of the pre-sliding group was smaller than that of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The shortening distance in both groups on postoperative day 1 was smaller in the pre-sliding group than in the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07), and the shortening distance was smaller than in the traditional group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Of the 110 cases, 34 (30.9%) had moderate or severe shortening, of which 24 (44.4%) were in the traditional group and 10 (17.9%) in the pre-sliding group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001), and the Harris score at 1 year, which was higher in the pre-sliding group than in the traditional group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison of baseline data such as gender, age, side, mechanism of injury, fracture type, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and quality of reduction between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and no statistically significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (P = 0.113).

CONCLUSION

The use of the pre-sliding technique of displaced femoral neck fracture fixed with FNS reduces the incidence of moderate and severe shortening, improves the postoperative TAD value, and improves the hip function scores, with a satisfactory midterm efficacy.

Pre-sliding of the femoral neck system to prevent postoperative shortening of femoral neck fractures

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pre-sliding of the femoral neck system (FNS) in the prevention of postoperative femoral neck shortening in femoral neck fractures.

Method

This study was designed to retrospectively analyze data from 109 patients with femoral neck fractures who were admitted to a Level I trauma center between April 2020 and June 2022. Of these patients, 90 were followed up for more than 12 months. The study included 52 males and 38 females, with 35 cases of Garden I and II fractures and 55 cases of Garden III and IV fractures. The Harris Hip Score at 12 months postoperatively were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups based on their surgical records and postoperative radiography: the Pre-sliding group and the No-pre-sliding group. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of pre-sliding in preventing femoral neck shortening, fracture healing time, degree of postoperative shortening, complications, and Harris Hip Score, and to make a comparison between the two groups.

Results

All 90 patients were followed up for over one year after surgery. A statistically significant difference was observed in the preoperative Garden classification (P < 0.05). At 1 year after the operation, the shortening distance was 6.5 ± 6.4 mm in the No-pre-sliding group and 3.9 ± 3.4 mm in the Pre-sliding group. The Harris Hip Score were 88.7 (79.8, 93.5) in the No-pre-sliding group and 94.8 (87.7, 96.9) in the Pre-sliding group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Shortening was concentrated at 3 months postoperatively and reached a stable state within 6 months, with less persistent shortening occurring after 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative baseline data.

Conclusion

Pre-sliding of the FNS prevents postoperative shortening of the femoral neck and improves hip function as measured by the Harris Hip Score.

High-energy Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients

Femoral neck fractures in physiologically young patients typically occur from high-energy axial loading forces through the thigh with the hip in an abducted position. These fractures have a high rate of associated head, chest, abdominal, and musculoskeletal injuries. High-energy hip fractures differ from traditional geriatric hip fractures regarding incidence, mechanism, management algorithms, and complications. After adequate resuscitation, goals of treatment include anatomic reduction and stable fixation while maintaining vascularity of the femoral head, which can be achieved through a variety of different techniques. Prompt recognition and treatment of these fractures is crucial to achieve a successful outcome because these injuries are often associated with complications such as osteonecrosis, fixation failure, and nonunion.

Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and Cannulated Screw Fixation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study

Background

Femoral neck fractures need to be treated in their early stages with accurate reduction and stable fixation to reduce complications. The authors compared the early radiologic outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated with the recently introduced Femoral Neck System (FNS, Depuy-Synthes) with conventional cannulated screws (CS) in a multicenter design. Furthermore, the factors associated with early failure after FNS were analyzed.

Methods

The FNS group included 40 patients treated between June 2019 and January 2020, and the CS group included 65 patients treated between January 2015 and May 2019. The operation was performed in 3 university hospitals. Patient demographics, fracture classification, postoperative reduction quality, sliding distance of FNS or CS, union and time to union, and complication rates were examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed on candidate factors for early failure of the FNS group.

Results

The FNS group had a 90% union rate and a mean time to union of 4.4 months, while the CS group had similar results with an 83.1% union rate and a mean time to union of 5.1 months. In the subgroup analysis of Pauwels type III fractures, the union rates were 75.0% and 58.8% in the FNS and CS groups, respectively, and the time to union was significantly shorter in the FNS group with 4.8 months compared to 6.8 months in the CS group. Early failure rate within 6 months of FNS fixation was observed to be 10%, which included 3 reduction failures and 1 excessive sliding with a broken implant. Risk factors for early failure after FNS were identified as displaced fractures (Garden classification type III or IV), poor reduction quality, longer tip-apex distance, greater sliding distance, and 1-hole implants, of which sliding distance was the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In femoral neck fractures, FNS and CS did not show significant differences for short-term radiologic results. FNS resulted in shorter operative time than cannulated screw fixation and favorable outcomes in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. The FNS could be considered a reliable and safe alternative to CS when treating femoral neck fractures.

Revision ratio after Femoral Neck System implantation for hip fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort analysis

The aim of the study is to determine the revision ratio after implantation of the femoral neck system (FNS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. A retrospective single center cohort analysis with a total of 71 patients who underwent the implantation of the FNS between December 2019 and December 2021, was performed. 31 males and 40 females were included. There was no exclusion based on BMI, ASA score, Garden classification or Pauwels classification. Primary outcome was the revision rate after FNS implantation. Secondary outcomes comprise the reason for revision surgery as well as the time toward revision surgery and the 30-day mortality. The revision ratio was 11 out of 71 patients (15.5%) with an average time to revision surgery of 10 months. Most common reason for revision was avascular necrosis (AVN) in 45.5%. Other reasons for revision surgery were implant failure due to a secondary fall on to the hip with the FNS implant in place, cut-out, cut-through and malunion in respectively 27.3%, 9%, 9% and 9% of the revision patients. The one- hole plate was used in 72% of the patients. Mean follow-up was 18.07 months (range 6-30 months). Full weight bearing instruction was given to 85.9% of the patients. Partial weight bearing in 14.1% of the patients. In conclusion, the FNS has similar revision ratio when used for femoral neck fractures compared to cannulated screw fixation in literature. The predominant reason for revision is AVN and implant failure with no difference between the use of the one- or-two-hole plate in this study.

Limitations and Complications in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures with the Femoral Neck System: A Case Report

Introduction

The femoral neck system (FNS) represents an emerging fixation system designed for the management of femoral neck fractures. This innovative system combines the mechanical benefits of compression and anti-rotation properties in internal fixation. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated the superior axial and rotational stability of the FNS implant when compared to traditional cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw. Despite these promising mechanical advantages, there is currently a limited body of literature addressing the factors contributing to FNS failure. A thorough assessment of the safety and outcomes associated with this novel implant is essential.

Case Report

In this context, we present three cases wherein FNS failure occurred, aiming to elucidate the potential causes behind these failures, and had to undergo either an implant removal or bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Conclusion

While considering the femoral neck system as the implant of choice, we should consider the age, injury to surgery time, and the location of the fracture line. However, we cannot conclusively ascertain whether age contributes independently to the risk of failure.

Bio-mechanical effects of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

As a novel internal fixation for femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has some advantages for young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures without clear biomechanical effects and mechanisms. Thus, the objection of the study is to realize the biomechanical effects and mechanism of FNS cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures compared to cannulated screws which are commonly used for femoral neck fractures by finite element analysis.

METHODS

Firstly, the model of young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, femoral neck system (FNS), and three cannulated screws (CS) arranged in an inverted triangle were established, and the internal fixations were set up to fix young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Under 2100 N load, the finite element was performed, and the deformation, peak von Mises stress (VMS), and contact at fracture segments were recorded to analyze the biomechanical effects and mechanism of FNS and three-CS fixing young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

RESULTS

Compared to three-CS, the deformation of the whole model, internal fixation, and fracture segments after FNS fixation were lower, and the peak VMS of the whole model and the internal fixation after FNS were higher with lower peak VMS of the distal femur and the fracture segments. With a sticking contact status, the contact pressure at fracture segments after FNS fixation was lower than that of three-CS.

CONCLUSIONS

FNS can provide better mechanical effects for young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, which may be the mechanical mechanism of the clinical effects of FNS on femoral neck fracture. Although there is high stress on FNS, it is still an effective and safe internal fixation for young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Femoral neck system versus multiple cannulated screws for the fixation of Pauwels classification type II femoral neck fractures in older female patients with low bone mass

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures in older adult patients are a major concern and often necessitate surgical intervention. This study compared the clinical outcomes of 2 surgical techniques: the femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated compression screws (CCSs).

METHODS

A total of 40 female patients (mean age 73.50 ± 11.55 years) with femoral neck fractures of Pauwels classification type II and receiving surgical fixation between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled. The patients were categorized into an FNS group (n = 12) or a CCS group (n = 28), and surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences in demographic characteristics were discovered. The mean surgical duration for all patients was 52.88 ± 22.19 min, with no significant difference between the groups. However, the FNS group experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.002) and longer hospital stay (P = 0.023) than did the CCS group. The incidence of osteonecrosis was higher in the CCS group, whereas the incidence of nonunion or malunion was higher in the FNS group. The surgical method did not appear to be a significant risk factor. The main risk factor for revision surgery was longer duration until the first adverse event (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

The FNS does not appear to provide superior surgical outcomes compared with CCSs in older adult women with Pauwels classification type II femoral neck fractures. A longer duration between surgical fixation and the first adverse event before stabilization of the fracture site may be a risk factor for revision surgery.

[Early effectiveness of Ti-Robot assisted femoral neck system for minimally invasive treatment of elderly Garden type Ⅱ and Ⅲ femoral neck fractures]

Objective

To investigate the early effectiveness of the Ti-Robot assisted femoral neck system (FNS) in the treatment of elderly Garden type Ⅱ and Ⅲ femoral neck fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 41 elderly patients with Garden type Ⅱ and Ⅲ femoral neck fractures who were admitted between December 2019 and August 2022 and met the selection criteria. Among them, 21 cases were treated with Ti-Robot assisted FNS internal fixation (study group), and 20 cases were treated solely with FNS internal fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in baseline data, including gender, age, side, cause of injury, time from injury to surgery, fracture Garden classification, and fracture line classification, between the two groups ( P>0.05). Surgical effectiveness was evaluated based on parameters such as operation time (including incision time and total operation time), reduction level, number of dominant pin insertions, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, incision length, whether to extend the incision, need for assisted reduction, postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 1 day, and Harris hip score at last follow-up.

Results

The study group showed significantly shorter incision time, fewer dominant pin insertions, fewer instances of extended incisions, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and smaller incisions than the control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in total operation time, reduction level, and assisted reduction frequency between the two groups ( P>0.05). Both groups achieved primary wound healing postoperatively, with no complications such as incision leakage or skin infection. All patients were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 14.6 months. Fractures healed in both groups, with no significant difference in healing time ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). The study group showed significantly better VAS score at 1 day after operation and Harris hip score at last follow-up when compared to the control group ( P<0.05). No complication such as internal fixation failure, fracture displacement, or hip joint varus occurred in both groups during the follow-up. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred in 1 patient of the control group, while no was observed in the study group, and the difference in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head between the two groups was not significant ( P=0.488).

Conclusion

Compared to sole FNS internal fixation treatment, Ti-Robot assisted FNS internal fixation for elderly Garden typeⅡ and Ⅲ femoral neck fractures can reduce incision time, achieve minimally invasive and accurate nail implantation, and decrease intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, leading to improved postoperative hip joint function recovery.

Factors associated with early failure of the femoral neck system (FNS) in patients with femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck system (FNS) is a new type of internal fixation system which has been widely used for treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs).Compared with other internal fixation methods, FNS is minimally invasive and stable, and often achieves satisfactory short-term efficacy.Early failure of FNS (EFFNS) is not uncommon, however, there are few literatures and reports on factors associated with EFFNS.This study aimed to survey the prevalence and risk factors of EFFNS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 62 patients with FNFs and underwent FNS fixation between 2019 and 2021. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, radiographic features and treatment process were described. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the different influencing factors.

RESULTS

Out of the 62 FNFs patients, 10 patients (16.1%) developed EFFNS, including 6 cases of severe femoral neck shortening, 2 cases of screw-out, 1 case of avascular necrosis of the femoral head and 1 case of nonunion. In the failure group, all patients were younger than 65 years old, which was significantly higher than 59.6% in the healing group (P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in sex(P = 0.490), BMI (P = 0.709), injured side (P = 0.312), injury mechanism (P = 0.617), reduction method(P = 0.570),femoral neck-shaft angle(P = 0.545), Pauwels classification (P = 0.564) and Garden classification (P = 0.195). Moreover, we not found that Garden classification (P = 0.464) and age (P = 0.128) were statistically significant risk factors for EFFNS at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this study, sex, BMI, injury side, injury mechanism, reduction method, Pauwels angle, femoral neck-shift angle, Pauwels classification and Garden classification were excluded as EFFNS risk factors. Moreover, our study demonstrated that age and Garden classification were not significant risk factors at multivariate analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100051360. Registered on 21 September, 2021. https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .

A Novel Navigation Device for Precise Percutaneous Placement of the Guidewire in Femoral Neck Fracture Cannulated Screw Fixation Surgery

The accuracy of screw placement is a key factor for the stability of the cannulated screws used in the fixation of femoral neck fractures. In this study we designed a navigation device for ensuring the screw reaches the ideal position for optimal fixation. From March 2019 to September 2020, 66 patients with femoral neck fracture were enrolled and divided into 2 groups, one group was treated using the traditional free-hand cannulated screw fixation and the other using the new navigation device with assisted fixation. The effectiveness of the 2 methods was compared based on surgery duration, intraoperative bleeding, number of fluoroscopic examination and guidewire insertion attempts, screw parallelism, and effective fixation area. Fracture healing, complications and hip joint function were assessed after operation. The new navigation device reduced the duration of surgery without causing additional intraoperative bleeding, and significantly reduced number of fluoroscopy examination and guidewire insertion attempts (4.00±1.58 vs. 6.09±1.94 with traditional surgery). The accuracy of screw implantation was improved, as demonstrated by increased screw parallelism (0.71±0.57° vs. 1.66 ±1.01° with traditional surgery) and higher effective fixed area (64.88±10.52 vs. 58.61±9.19 mm2 with traditional surgery). In the postoperative follow-up, except for one case of femoral head necrosis and one case of bone nonunion in the traditional surgical group, the other patients showed fracture healing. There was no significant difference in hip joint function between the 2 groups. The new navigation device enables rapid and accurate guidewire positioning for cannulated screw fixation through simple operation procedures, resulting in good prospect for clinical transformation.

In vitro biomechanical analysis of a locking self-compression screw model applied to Pauwels III and comminuted femoral neck fractures

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) affect the young adult population and are intimately related to high-energy trauma. Despite innovations in osteosynthesis materials, the rate of complications remains at 10%-59% in Pauwels type III (PIII) fractures. The authors thus propose a fixation model with a novel self-compression screw, comparing it to a sliding hip screw plate associated with a derotation screw in the fixation of a PIII fracture with posterior inferior comminution. The finite element method (FEM) was used in this comparison along with a virtual femur model with structural characteristics similar to those of a healthy young human bone. We formed 4 groups: Group 1 (GC), intact bone; Group 2 (SHS+S), sliding hip screw plate with derotation screw; Group 3 (XS), X-pin + SS (self-compression model with superior positioning screw); Group 4 (XI), X-pin + IS (self-compression model with inferior positioning screw). A 700 N monotonic load was applied to the apex of the femur head towards the ground so that stress was mainly focused on the fracture site and osteosynthesis. Analyses included total displacement and maximum principal stress and were performed for all groups. Fracture displacement, rotation, and von Mises were assessed only in groups that underwent osteosynthesis. Total displacement values in groups with self-compression screws (XS and XI) were closer to those for healthy femurs, with a 38.5% reduction when comparing the XS group with the SHS+S group. Fracture displacement and rotation values presented reductions of over 60% when comparing the XS and XI groups with the SHS+S group. Equivalent Von Mises stress values were similar between XS and XI and presented a reduction of approximately 5.25% when compared with the SHS+S group. Our FEM analyses demonstrated that the self-compression screw model has potential biomechanical advantages over the SHS+S model.

Open reduction and internal fixation of irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture with femoral Neck System: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Most displaced femoral neck fractures can achieve satisfactory anatomical reduction by closed reduction, but there are still some that cannot reset satisfactorily after closed reduction, and open reduction are required. Such fractures that cannot be repositioned successfully by closed reduction are called irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures in this study. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of direct anterior incision with the Femoral Neck System in the treatment of irreducible displaced femoral fractures.

METHODS

A total of 16 young and middle-aged patients with irreducible displaced femoral neck fractures involving Garden type III and IV were treated using Femoral Neck System fixation by open reduction through Direct Anterior Approach between January 2020 to September 2021. Functional outcomes and postoperative complications were assessed during follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Hip Harris score. The postoperative reduction was evaluated by the Garden Index. Observe postoperative complications.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up time of 21.1(12-30) months, and according to radiological results, all patients achieved fracture healing, with a mean healing time of 4.25 months. All 16 patients received grade Garden I and II reductions, and there was no significant difference in the anteroposterior Garden reduction index between the first day after surgery (166.13 ± 5.61) and the 12th month after surgery(164.94 ± 4.49) (P>0.05) and no significant difference in lateral Garden index between the first day after surgery(171.06 ± 4.46) and the 12th month after surgery(169.38 ± 3.98) (P<0.05). According to the Hip Harris score scale, 13 patients received excellent and 3 patients received good. The postoperative Hip Harris Score(17.19 ± 4.8) was significantly higher than the preoperative score(92.19 ± 3.4), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No or mild femoral neck shortness occurred in 12 (75%) patients, moderate shortening occurred in 3 (18.75%) patients, and severe shortening occurred in 1 (6.25%) patient. None of the patients experienced femoral head necrosis, fracture nonunion, or incision infection. One patient developed deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Direct Anterior Approach combined with Femoral Neck System is an excellent treatment for irreducible displaced femoral neck fracture and achieved good functional outcomes and anatomical reduction with low complications.

Restoration of Hip Geometry after Femoral Neck Fracture: A Comparison of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) and the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)

BACKGROUND

The femoral neck system (FNS) was introduced as a minimally invasive fixation device for managing femoral neck fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To compare radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of femoral neck fracture patients following FNS compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS) implantation combined with an anti-rotational screw.

METHODS

Patients who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively included. We measured leg length, femoral offset, and centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle in plain radiographs. Scar length, Harris Hip Score, short-form health survey 36-item score (SF-36), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were assessed during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

We included 43 patients (22 females) with a median age of 66 (IQR 57, 75). In both groups, leg length differences between the injured and the contralateral side increased, and femoral offset and CCD angle differences were maintained over time. FNS patients had shorter scars and reported fewer emotional problems and more energy. There were no differences between groups regarding the remaining SF-36 sub-scores, Harris Hip Score, and NRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The FNS allows for a comparable leg length, femoral offset, and CCD angle reconstruction while achieving similarly high functional and global health scores to the DHS.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution and inverted triangular distribution in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution in comparison with the 'gold standard' of inverting three cannulated screws with triangular distribution, in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A total of 106 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated at the Department of Orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital) from October 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups A and B. Group A consisted of 51 patients with a mean age of 73.3±6.8 years; and group B consisted of 55 patients with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years. Group A was treated with closed reduction + inverted triangular distribution of three cannulated screws, while group B was treated with closed reduction + parallel distribution of three cannulated screws, and the general surgical conditions, including fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and functional recovery scale (FRS) score of hip joint function were assessed in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.8 months. Compared with group A, group B had significant advantages in operation time, number of times intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed, number of intraoperative guide wire adjustments, and proportion of postoperative referrals to the intensive care unit (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and FRS score of hip joint function between groups A and B (P>0.05). For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, distributing three cannulated screws in parallel after closed reduction achieved similar clinical efficacy to 'gold standard' inverted triangular distribution, and had obvious advantages in operation time, with significantly reduced surgical difficulty. This procedure is therefore deemed worthy of promotion and clinical application in the primary hospitals of China.

Safe range of femoral neck system insertion and the risk of perforation

BACKGROUND

Internal fixation of the femoral neck carries a risk of perforation due to the presence of the isthmus of the femoral neck. At present, there are few studies on the safe and risk zones of the femoral neck system (FNS) implantation. This study aimed to recommend the safe range of injection of FNS in the lateral wall of the proximal femur, parallel to the axis of the femoral neck, during FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture (FNF).

METHODS

Femoral computed tomography (CT) data of 80 patients (male: 40; female: 40) who met the inclusion criteria were collected. Mimics 21.0 software was used to complete the modeling. 3-Matic 13.0 software was used to establish the axis of the femoral neck and its vertical plane, perform the cutting of the femoral neck, and project it on the vertical plane of the femoral neck axis. After matching a rectangle for each projection map, all sample sizes (80 cases) were standardized and superimposed to obtain gradient maps of the safe zone (SZ) and dangerous zone (RZ), thereby securing edge key points and safe FNS insertion range.

RESULTS

In the 80 samples, the mean diameter of the smallest femoral neck section was 33.87 ± 2.32 mm for men and 29.36 ± 1.92 mm for women. All 80 femoral necks had safe and risky areas. The SZ/S × 100% was 77.59 (± 2.22%), and the RS/S × 100% was 22.39% (± 2.22%). The risk area was composed of four parts: (1), (2), (3), and (4), respectively, corresponding to 3.45 ± 1.74%, 5.51 ± 2.63%, 6.22 ± 1.41%, and 7.22 ± 1.39%. Four marginal key points, perforation risk, and safe ranges (SR) of FNS were analyzed on the lateral wall of the femoral neck.

CONCLUSIONS

The SR of FNS placement was recommended by digital simulation. In addition, Regions (3) and (4) posed a higher risk of penetrating the cortex. Using the gradient map of RZ for preoperative evaluation is recommended to avoid iatrogenic perforation.

Femoral neck system and cannulated compression screws in the treatment of non-anatomical reduction Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

High shear force is a major factor detrimental to the healing of vertical femoral neck fractures. In addition to firm fixation, reduction quality is crucial for postoperative stability. The present study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of the newly invented femoral neck system and three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws treatments for non-anatomical reduction of Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A total of 18 non-anatomical reduction Pauwels type-III femoral neck fracture finite element models were fabricated and fixed using three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws or the femoral neck system. A 1950-N force was applied to the femoral head to simulate the physiological load during a single-leg stance. Parameters of the maximum total deformation, the interfragmentary gap, and the maximum von Mises stress of the implants and the proximal femur were analyzed.

FINDINGS

The results of the maximum total deformation, interfragmentary gap, and maximum von Mises stress of the implants in the negative-negative buttress model fixed by the femoral neck system were the largest among all groups (3.58 mm, 0.252 mm, and 729.68 MPa, respectively). In contrast, the anatomical-anatomical reduction model fixed by three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws demonstrated the minimum total deformation, interfragmentary gap, and minimum von Mises stress of implants (1.107 mm, 0.09 mm, and 189.83 MPa, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Anatomical reduction or positive buttress in femoral neck fractures should be recommended during fracture reduction. The femoral neck system showed weaker biomechanical stability than three inverted-triangle cannulated compression screws in treating Pauwels type-III femoral neck fractures.

Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative safety and efficacy of cannulated compression screw (CCS) and femoral neck system (FNS) in treating patients with femoral neck fractures and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for FNS in treating femoral neck fractures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to collect outcomes related to femoral neck fractures treated with FNS and CCS, including time to fracture healing, incidence of non-union, incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, incidence of failure of internal fixation, rate of femoral neck shortening, Harris hip score, Barthel index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, and complications. A meta-analysis was performed using RevManv5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata v14.0 software.

Results

This analysis included 21 studies involving 1,347 patients. The results showed that FNS was superior to CCS in terms of fracture healing time [mean difference (MD) = -0.75, 95% CI = (-1.04, -0.46), P < 0.05], incidence of bone non-union [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head [OR = 0.49, 95% CI = (0.28, 0.86), P = 0.01], incidence of internal fixation failure [OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.52), P < 0.05], rate of femoral neck shortening [OR = 0.38, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.54), P > 0.05], Harris hip score [MD = 3.31, 95% CI = (1.99, 4.63), P < 0.001], Barthel index [MD =  4.31, 95% CI = (3.02, 5.61), P < 0.05], intraoperative bleeding [MD = 14.72, 95% CI = (8.52, 20.92), P < 0.05], fluoroscopy frequency [OR = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.29, 0.98), P = 0.04], and complications [OR = 0.31, 95% CI = (0.22, 0.45), P < 0.05]. The difference between FNS and CCS in operative time was not statistically significant [MD = -2.41, 95% CI = (-6.88, 2.05), P = 0.29].

Conclusion

FNS treatment of femoral neck fracture can shorten the fracture healing time; reduce the incidence and translucent rate of bone non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and internal fixation failure; reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications; and improve hip joint function and activity. We are confident in the findings that FNS, an effective and safe procedure for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures, is superior to CCS.

Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures in the elderly population are common and the number of patients is rising. For young and geriatric patients with undisplaced fractures osteosynthesis is the primary type of treatment. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) is around for many years and proved its value especially in displaced fractures. Since 2018 the femoral neck system (FNS) is available as an alternative showing promising biomechanical results. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical results of the FNS and compare it to the DHS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients older than 18 years with Garden I-IV fractures that were treated with osteosynthesis in a level 1 trauma center were included in the study. Between January 2015 and March 2021, all patients treated with FNS (1-hole plate, DePuy-Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) or DHS (2-hole plate, DePuy-Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) for proximal femur fractures were included in the study. Closed reduction was achieved using a traction table. All operations were carried out by experienced orthopedic trauma surgeons. Primary outcome measures were rate of implant failure (cut out) and surgical complications (hematoma, infection). Secondary outcome measures were Hb-difference, length of hospital stay and mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 221 patients were included in the study. 113 were treated with FNS, 108 with DHS. Mean age was 69 ± 14 years. There were 17.2% Garden I, 47.5% Garden II, 26.7% Garden III and 8.6% Garden IV fractures. No difference between the groups for age, body mass index (BMI), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), time to surgery, Pauwels and Garden classification, rate of optimal blade position or tip apex distance was found. FNS showed lower pre- to postoperative Hb-difference (1.4 ± 1.1 g/l vs. 2.1 ± 1.4 g/l; p < 0.05), shorter operating time (36.3 ± 11.6 min vs. 54.7 ± 17.4 min; p < 0.05) and hospital stay (8.8 ± 4.3 d vs. 11.2 ± 6.8 d; p < 0.05). Surgical complications (FNS 13.3% vs. DHS 18.4%, p > 0.05), rate of cut out (FNS 12.4% vs. DHS 10.2%, p > 0.05) and mortality (FNS 3.5%; DHS 0.9%; p > 0.05) showed no difference between the groups. Logistic regression showed that poor blade position was the only significant predictor for cut out and increased the risk by factor 7. Implant related infection (n = 3) and hematoma/seroma (n = 6) that needed revision was only seen in DHS group.

CONCLUSION

FNS proved to be as reliable as DHS in all patients with hip fractures. Not the type of implant but blade positioning is still key to prevent implant failure. Still due to minimal invasive approach implant related infections and postoperative hematomas might have been prevented using the FNS.

Incidence and factors influencing neck shortening after screw fixation of femoral neck fractures with the femoral neck system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of postoperative femoral neck shortening in patients with femoral neck fractures fixed with femoral neck system screws (FNS) and to explore the factors influencing femoral neck shortening.

METHOD

To retrospectively analyze the data of 113 patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to the Second Hospital of Fuzhou City, affiliated with Xiamen University, between December 2019 and January 2022. Of these, 87 patients were followed up for more than 12 months, 49 men and 38 women: 36 cases of Garden I and II fractures and 51 cases of Garden III and IV fractures, to record the patient's hip Harris score at 12 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into femoral neck shortening group and femoral neck no shortening group according to their regular postoperative follow-up radiographic measurements. To count the incidence of femoral neck shortening, a comparison of postoperative complication rates and hip Harris scores between the two groups was made. Statistical comparison of the two groups and a multifactorial logistic regression analysis were also performed to analyze the factors affecting femoral neck shortening.

RESULTS

All 87 patients were followed up for more than 12 months after surgery. In 34 of these cases, neck shortening occurred, and the incidence rate was 39.1%. 15 cases of severe shortening, incidence of 17.2%; fracture healing 84 cases, fracture healing rate of 96.5%. The hip Harris score was 83.99 (81.95, 89.20) in the neck shortening group at 12 months postoperatively, 90.87 (87.95, 94.80) for the group without neck shortening; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). 32 cases of fracture healing in the neck shortening group at 12 months after surgery, fracture healing rate of 94.1%; 52 cases healed without neck shortening group, fracture healing rate of 98.1%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.337). High incidence of neck shortening after FNS fixation of femoral neck fractures, cortical comminution of the severed end, fracture fractionation and quality of reduction were significantly correlated with neck shortening.

CONCLUSION

High incidence of postoperative neck shortening after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with the femoral neck system, the cortical comminution, the type of fracture, and the quality of fracture reduction are the influencing factors; femoral neck shortening can affect postoperative hip function, but does not affect fracture healing.

Comparison of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, some studies on the efficacy of the femoral neck system (FNS) in treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) have been published. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to clarify the efficacy and safety of FNS versus cannulated screws (CS) for the treatment of FNFs.

METHOD

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing FNS and CS fixations in FNFs. Intraoperative indicators, postoperative clinical indicators, postoperative complications, and postoperative scores were compared between the implants.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included in the study, involving 448 FNFs patients. The results showed that patients in FNS group were significantly lower than the CS group in the number of X-ray exposures (WMD = -10.16; 95% CI, -11.44 to -8.88; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), fracture healing time (WMD = -1.54; 95% CI, -2.38 to -0.70; P < 0.001; I² = 92%), length of femoral neck shortening (WMD = -2.01; 95% CI, -3.11 to -0.91; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), femoral head necrosis (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.83; P = 0.02; I² = 0%), implant failure/cutout (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.82; P = 0.02; I² = 0%), and Visual Analog Scale Score (WMD = -1.27; 95% CI, -2.51 to -0.04; P = 0.04; I² = 91%). And the Harris Score was significantly higher in the FNS group than in the CS group (WMD = 4.15; 95% CI, 1.00 to 7.30; P = 0.01; I² = 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, FNS shows better clinical efficacy and safety in treating FNFs compared to CS. However, due to the limited quality and number of included studies and the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis; large samples and multicenter RCTs are needed to confirm this conclusion in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021283646.

Comparison of femoral neck system and three cannulated cancellous screws in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures: clinical observation and finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical and clinical results of two surgical methods for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures: Femoral neck system (FNS) and traditional three cannulated cancellous screws (CCS).

METHODS

First, we developed three different vertical femoral neck fracture models for the finite element analysis, with angles of 55°, 65°, and 75°, respectively. Two experimental groups were set up: the FNS group and the CCS group. Each fracture group was tested under axial loads of 2100 N to measure the femur's displacement, Von Mises stress (VMS), and its internal fixation components. Secondly, we retrospectively included the cases of vertical femoral neck fractures with FNS and CCS in our hospital from May 2019 to May 2021. In this study, we compared the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, operative time, hospital stay, fracture healing time, Hemoglobin loss, Harris score of hip joint function, and postoperative complications among patients undergoing hip joint replacement.

RESULTS

In terms of finite element analysis, FNS has better anti-displacement stability than CCS at 55°and 65°, while FNS is greater than CCS in Von Mises stress. Clinically, we followed up on 87 patients for an average of 12 months. FNS was superior to traditional CCS in fracture healing time, operation time, fluoroscopy duration, fracture healing time, and Harris hip function score.

CONCLUSION

FNS is superior to traditional CCS in biomechanical and clinical aspects of treating vertical femoral neck fractures. There is potential for FNS to become a new treatment option for vertical femoral neck fractures.

Femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients: femoral neck system versus cannulated cancellous screw

BACKGROUND

The fractures of femoral neck account for 50% among hip fractures with around 3%-10% occurring in younger population of below 65 years. The newly introduced FNS as management approach appears to be a potential alternative to the traditional CCS. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and outcome of the femoral neck system (FNS) and the cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adult below 65 years of age.

METHODS

Data of 114 patients between 18-65 years, admitted in our department for femoral neck fracture from January 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively studied and ranged into two groups based on the surgical methods: FNS group (56 patients) and CCS group (58 patients). The variables of interest including demographic and clinical variables (age, gender, fracture mechanism, injury side and classification), perioperative parameters(operation time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length and hospitalization time), postoperative outcomes and complications (fracture healing time, nonunion rate, femoral neck avascular necrosis, aseptic screw loosening and the Harris Hip Score), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All 114 patients presented satisfactory reduction and were followed-up for a period of 12 to 36 months (mean 27 ± 2.07 months); there were no significant differences between both groups in terms of age, gender, fracture classification, side of injury, mechanism of injury, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the hospital length of stay. However, the fracture healing time between FNS group and CCS group was statistically significant (p < 0.05), respectively 2.86 ± 0.77 and 5.10 ± 0.81 months. The significant differences were also found in terms of numbers of fluoroscopies 8.34 ± 1.38 Vs 17.72 ± 2.19, the HHS 87.80 ± 1.92 Vs 84.28 ± 2.24, postoperative complications 8 (14.28%) Vs 26 (44.82) respectively in FNS and CCS group.

CONCLUSION

FNS presented satisfactory outcomes had significantly lower complications rate, therefore, can be one of the alternatives for internal implantation devices in treatment of femoral neck fracture in non-geriatric population.

Efficacy of the femoral neck system in femoral neck fracture treatment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains around the available choices for the internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. The femoral neck system (FNS) was developed in 2018 and has been widely applied since then as it can provide rigid fixation stability with less damage to the bone mass around the fracture. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of traditional internal fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of the FNS in comparison with that of cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral fractures through systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) were searched from the earliest publication date to December 31, 2021. Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/) was used to check the results and further analyze the related articles. Controlled trials were included if the FNS was applied for the femoral neck fracture in adults and if it was compared with CCS for the achievement of internal fixation. The measurement outcomes included the required operation time, observed patient’s blood loss, extent of fracture healing, patient’s Harris Hip score (HHS) at the last follow-up, and records of any complications (such as failure of internal fixation, femoral neck shortness, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and delayed union or nonunion).

RESULTS

Ten retrospective controlled studies (involving 711 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with CCS, use of the FNS could not decrease the operation time [standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98 to 0.22, P = 0.21, I² = 93%), but it could increase the intraoperative blood loss (SMD: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.15 to 1.03, P = 0.009, I² = 81%). The pooled results also showed that compared with CCS, the FNS could better promote fracture healing (SMD: -0.97, 95%CI: -1.65 to -0.30, P = 0.005, I² = 91%), improve the HHS at the last follow-up (SMD: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.21, P = 0.0009, I² = 84%), and reduce the chances of developing femoral neck shortness (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.61, P = 0.001, I² = 0%) and delayed union or nonunion (OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.73, P = 0.001; I² = 0%) in adult patients with femoral neck fractures. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the FNS and CCS in terms of failure of internal fixation (OR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.23 to 1.06, P = 0.07, I² = 0%) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (OR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.20 to 1.10, P = 0.08, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with CCS, the FNS could decrease the chances of developing femoral neck shortness and delayed union or nonunion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Simultaneously, it could accelerate fracture healing and improve the HHS in these patients.

Comparison of Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Cancellous Screws for the Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A femoral neck fracture is a very common injury in the elderly. However, its incidence is low among young adults, usually presenting as an emergency. In young adults, implant choice is one of the important factors. This systematic review aims to analyze the femoral neck system (FNS) versus cannulated cancellous (CC) screw for the fixation of femoral neck fractures in young adults through well-defined objectives. A comprehensive search from the electronic database (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) was conducted from the beginning till February 18, 2022. The data regarding study type, authors, year of publication, country, union time, Harris hip score, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, neck shortening, and hospital stay were extracted from the selected articles and analyzed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. For continuous data, e.g., healing time, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, Harris hip score, neck shortening, and hospital stay, the mean difference (MD), either weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was recorded. A p-value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used for the risk of bias assessment. Six retrospective cohort studies including 427 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. There was significantly less healing time (WMD= -1.10, 95% CI: -1.73 to -0.47), shorter operation duration (WMD=7.70, 95% CI: -0.06 to 15.46), and better Harris hip score (WMD=4.79, 95% CI: 2.12-7.46) in the FNS than CC screw fixation method. However, intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CC screw system (WMD=21.27, 95% CI: 8.20-34.35). There was no significant difference between the two approaches in-hospital stay duration and femoral neck shortening. This can be concluded that FNS is better than CC screw fixation for treating neck of femur fractures in adults on the outcome basis of union time, less operation time, and better Harris hip score (HHS) with significant heterogeneity.

Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of interlocking hip screw in Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures: A comparison with inverted triangle cannulated screws

Purpose: To compare biomechanical and clinical properties of the novel internal fixation Interlocking Hip Screw (IHS) and conventional inverted triangle cannulated screws (ITCS) for treatment of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures. Methods: Twenty synthetic femurs were osteotomized to simulate 70° Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures and randomly divided into two groups: Group IHS and Group ITCS. Specimens were loaded in quasi-static ramped and cyclical compression testing in 25° adduction to analyze for axial stiffness, failure load, and interfragmentary displacement. 21 matched patients with Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fracture who received closed reduction and internal fixation from January 2020 to January 2021 in both Group IHS and Group ITCS. Demographic data, time to surgery, operating duration, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris Hip Score (HHS), the score of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis, and femoral neck shortening were compared. Results: All specimens in the two groups survived in the axial and cyclical compression test. The axial stiffness was significantly higher for Group IHS (277.80 ± 26.58 N/mm) versus Group ITCS (205.33 ± 10.46 N/mm), p < 0.05. The maximum failure loading in Group IHS performed significantly higher than in Group ITCS (1,400.48 ± 71.60 N versus 996.76 ± 49.73 N, p < 0.05). The interfragmentary displacement of the cyclic loading test for Groups IHS and Group ITCS was 1.15 ± 0.11 mm and 1.89 ± 0.14 mm, respectively, p < 0.05. No significant difference was found in terms of demographic data, time to surgery, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and the occurrence of nonunion and avascular necrosis between groups. Shorter operating duration and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopic views were noticed using IHS compare to ITCS, p < 0.05. The HHS was 72.14 ± 5.76 and 86.62 ± 5.01 in Group IHS, and was 67.29 ± 5.27 and 81.76 ± 5.13 in Group ITCS at 3-month and 6-month follow-up, respectively, p < 0.05. The magnitude of femoral neck shortening was significantly lower in Group IHS compared to Group ITCS (4.80 ± 1.03 mm versus 5.56 ± 1.21 mm, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that IHS provided better biomechanical and clinical performance due to its unique biological and biomechanical mechanisms, compared with ITCS. Thus, IHS is a feasible alternative to ITCS for the fixation of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fractures.

Femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Femoral neck fracture treatment in young adults remains controversial. Cannulated screws (CS) and femoral neck system (FNS) are well-accepted methods for femoral neck fracture treatment; however, these methods are associated with complications. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relative safety and effectiveness of CS and FNS for treating young patients with femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

We searched the following sources for studies that compared CS and FNS fixation: Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine disc, and Chinese Science and Technology Journals. The outcomes were surgical and prognostic results and complications.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included eight studies. The pooled results revealed that the two fixation methods were similar in terms of the operation time, length of hospital stay, healing time, intraoperative blood loss, non-union, femoral head necrosis, and internal fixation cut-out. Compared with CS fixation, FNS fixation required fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies and had better Harris Hip Score, earlier weight-bearing, lower number of total complications, lesser femoral neck shortening, and lesser extent of nail retreat.

CONCLUSION

FNS fixation outperforms CS fixation in terms of intraoperative fluoroscopies, Harris Hip Score, and morbidity in young patients with femoral neck fractures. Clinicians should consider FNS as a first choice in treating femoral neck fracture in young adults, except where this approach is contraindicated.

Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Background

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the femoral neck system (FNS) with cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) in treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in controlled clinical trials.

Methods

Eligible scientific articles published prior to September 2021 were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Springer, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases. The statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1.

Results

Seven retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in perioperative blood loss, the postoperative Harris score, healing time, fluoroscopy frequency, total complications, femoral head necrosis, femoral neck shortening and screw cutout. No significant differences were found regarding operation time, length of hospital stay or nonunion between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with CCSs, the FNS showed better clinical efficacy and fewer complications in treating FNFs. Due to the limited quality and data of the currently available evidence, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

Finite element analysis of femoral neck system in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture

The optimal treatment strategy for femoral neck fractures remained controversial, especially the Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture of young patients was a challenge. Femoral neck system (FNS) was a newly developed internal fixation for treating femoral neck fracture and this study aimed to compare the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages between FNS and 3 cannulated configuration screws (CCS) with or without an additional medial buttress plate (MBP). In this study, Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture model with an angle of 70° was constructed and 3 different fixation models, FNS, CCS + MBP, CCS alone, were developed. A vertical force of 2100N was applied on the femoral head, then the maximum von Mises stress of whole model, distal femur, femoral head, and internal fixation was recorded, as well as the stress distribution of whole model, proximal fracture section, and internal fixation of the 3 models. Moreover, the maximum displacement of the whole model, distal femur, femoral head, internal fixation, and the relative displacement of the proximal and distal portion was also compared. The maximum von Mises stress value was 318.302 MPa in FNS, 485.226 MPa in CCS + 1/3 plate, and 425.889 MPa in CCS. The FNS showed lowest maximum von Mises stress values in distal part, femoral head, and internal implant. All fixation configurations were observed stress concentrated at the posteroinferior area of cross-section of femoral head and at the fracture section area of implant; however, FNS had more uniform stress distribution. For displacement, the maximum displacement value was 8.5446 mm in FNS, 8.2863 mm in CCS + 1/3 plate, and 8.3590 mm in CCS. However, FNS had higher maximum displacement in femoral head and internal implant, but lower maximum displacement in the distal part of fracture model. The FNS represented a significantly higher relative displacement between the femoral head and distal femur when compared with the other 2 fixation configurations. The newly developed FNS could achieve the dual effect of angular stability and sliding compression for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, which provided superior biomechanical stability than CCS alone and CCS with additional MBP.

Femoral neck system reduces surgical time and complications in adults with femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) in adults are conventionally managed with surgical options. This paper is aimed to assess the safety, and functional outcomes of the novel Femoral neck system (FNS) for FNF treatment in adult population.

METHODS

An organized quest of four literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed on March 1, 2022 using the term "femoral neck system". Fixed or random-effect meta-analysis was used to analyse the outcome measures after selecting relevant studies and assessing their quality. Heterogeneity was considered when calculating pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence ranges.

RESULTS

On comparing FNS with cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) or other methods, in a total of 762 patients (351 FNS and 411 CCS) in the 11 comparative studies considered for meta-analysis, blood loss was pointedly higher overall in the FNS group, mean difference 115.77 ml; 95% CI 3.11 ml, 28.42 ml; test of overall effect: z = 1.68, p = 0.09); with considerable heterogeneity. However, in the FNS group the operative time was substantially lower (Mean difference -7.91 min; 95% CI -15.01, -0.80; test of overall effect: z = 2.18, p = 0.03, with marked heterogeneity). Moreover, complications such as infections, non-union, osteonecrosis, implant cut-out were significantly lower in the FNS group with a Mantel Haenszel Odds ratio of 0.20 (95% CI 0.12, 0.34: Z = 6.01, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Keeping in mind the heterogenicity of the studies, -management of adult patients with FNF with FNS can provide results comparable to traditional fixation methods with significantly lower rate of complications.

Neck of femur fractures treated with the femoral neck system: outcomes of one hundred and two patients and literature review

Introduction

The recently developed femoral neck system (FNS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF), comprises theoretical biomechanical advantages compared to other implants. The aim of this study was to validate the safety and to report outcomes of patients treated with the FNS.

Method

A retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated by FNS with a minimum of three months of follow-up. Details analysed from three medical centres were operative duration, estimated blood loss, initial hospitalisation duration, fixation quality as well as complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had revision surgery were compared to all other patients to identify risk factors for failure. In addition, a literature review was performed to analyse data on FNS clinical implementation and patient’s outcomes. The two data sets were combined and analysed.

Results

One-hundred and two patients were included in this study cohort with an average follow-up of seven months (range 3–27). Ten papers were included in the literature review, reporting data on 278 patients. Overall, 380 patients were analysed. Average age was 62.6 years, 52% of the fractures were classified as Gardens 1–2. Overall, the revision rate was 9.2% (14 patients diagnosed with cut-out of implant, 10 with AVN, 8 with non-union and 8 with hardware removal). For the 102 patients in the cohort risk factors for reoperation included patients age, surgeon seniority and inadequate placement of the implant.

Conclusion

This study shows that FNS is a safe treatment option for FNF. Intra-operative parameters and failure rates are comparable to previously reported rates for this implant and other frequently used implants.

Comparing Perioperative Outcome Measures of the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Femoral Neck System

Background and Objective: Various fixation devices and surgical techniques are available for the management of proximal femur fractures. Recently, the femoral neck system (FNS) was introduced, and was promoted on the basis of less invasiveness, shorter operating time, and less fluoroscopy time compared to previous systems. The aim of this study was to compare two systems for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNF), namely the dynamic hip screw (DHS) with an anti-rotation screw (ARS) and an FNS. The outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), dose−area product (DAP), length of stay (LOS), perioperative changes in haemoglobin concentrations, and transfusion rate. Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-centre study was conducted. Patients treated for FNF between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2021 were included, provided that they had undergone closed reduction and internal fixation. We measured the centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) and the Pauwels angle preoperatively and one week postoperatively. Results: In total, 31 patients (16 females), with a mean age of 62.81 ± 15.05 years, were included. Fracture complexity assessed by the Pauwels and Garden classification did not differ between groups preoperatively. Nonetheless, the ORT (54 ± 26.1 min vs. 91.68 ± 23.96 min, p < 0.01) and DAP (721 ± 270.6 cGycm² vs. 1604 ± 1178 cGycm², p = 0.03) were significantly lower in the FNS group. The pre- and postoperative CCD and Pauwels angles did not differ statistically between groups. Perioperative haemoglobin concentration changes (−1.77 ± 1.19 g/dl vs. −1.74 ± 1.37 g/dl) and LOS (8 ± 5.27 days vs. 7.35 ± 3.43 days) were not statistically different. Conclusions: In this cohort, the ORT and DAP were almost halved in the patient group treated with FNS. This may confer a reduction in secondary risks related to surgery.