Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: the experience of a single center

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

 Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed via three different techniques, conventional, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB), or off-pump CABG (OPCAB), data are limited to compare ONBHCAB with OPCAB.

METHODS

 We retrospectively investigated the postoperative cardiac biomarkers, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (cTnI), and early and late outcomes in 806 patients undergoing isolated ONBHCAB or OPCAB between February 2008 and September 2022. To eliminate the bias between different groups, propensity score matching was conducted to validate the findings.

RESULTS

 After matching, the number of each study group totaled 270 patients. In both complete and matched cohorts, early outcomes, including morbidities and mortalities, were similar. However, cTnI and CK-MB levels were significantly higher after ONBHCAB than after OPCAB with median peak cTnI of 9.85 versus 4.60 ng/mL and median peak CK-MB of 48.45 versus 17.10 ng/mL in the matched cohort, which were quite low, below the threshold for values defining perioperative myocardial infarction. At follow-up of 73 ± 45 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were similar between the ONBHCAB and OPCAB patients (86 vs. 87% at 5 years and 64 vs. 68% at 10 years, respectively, in the matched cohort).

CONCLUSION

 ONBHCAB may be a comparable alternative to OPCAB with similar early and late outcomes, despite higher elevation of postoperative cardiac biomarkers. ONBHCAB provides more efficient hemodynamic support, providing a better surgical visual field, than OPCAB while reducing the risk of incomplete revascularization.

Comparative efficacy on outcomes of C-CABG, OPCAB, and ONBEAT in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IMPORTANCE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard for the treatment of multivessel and left main coronary heart disease. However, the current evidence about the optimal surgical revascularization strategy is inconsistent and is not sufficient to allow for definite conclusions. Thus, this topic needs to be extensively discussed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB), conventional on-pump CABG (C-CABG), and on-pump beating heart (ONBEAT) CABG via an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published in English before 1 December 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Published trials that included patients who received OPCAB, C-CABG, and ONBEAT CABG were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently screened the search results, assessed the full texts to identify eligible studies and the risk of bias of the included studies, and extracted data. All processes followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative mortality in patients who underwent C-CABG, OPCAB, or ONBEAT CABG. The secondary outcomes were postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal impairment in the three groups. The time point for analysis of outcomes was all time periods during the postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 39 385 patients (83 496.2 person-years) in 65 studies who fulfilled the prespecified criteria were included. In the network meta-analysis, OPCAB was associated with an increase of 12% in the risk of all-cause mortality when compared with C-CABG [odds ratio (OR): 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.21], a reduction of 49% in the risk of myocardial infarction when compared with ONBEAT (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.99), a reduction of 16% in the risk of stroke when compared with C-CABG (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99) and a similar risk of renal impairment when compared with C-CABG and ONBEAT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

OPCAB was associated with higher all-cause mortality but lower postoperative stroke compared with C-CABG. OPCAB was associated with a lower postoperative myocardial infarction than that of ONBEAT. Early mortality was comparable among OPCAB, ONBEAT, and C-CABG.

The outcomes of three different techniques of coronary artery bypass grafting: On-pump arrested heart, on-pump beating heart, and off-pump

OBJECTIVE

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or on-pump arrested heart CABG (ONCAB) is a standard and simple technique. However, adverse effects can occur due to the use of aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass. Performing off-pump CABG (OPCAB) aims to avoid these adverse effects but may result in incomplete revascularization. On-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB) combines the benefits of both ONCAB and OPCAB. This study focuses on comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of different CABG techniques.

METHOD

Retrospective observational cohort included 2,028 patients who underwent ONCAB, OPCAB, and ONBHCAB. The short-term outcomes including postoperative ischemic injury, hemodynamic functions, and adverse events were compared. The long-term outcomes were overall survival and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Propensity score matching ensured comparability among the three patient groups.

RESULTS

After matching, there were no differences in baseline characteristics. Regarding ischemic injury, OPCAB showed the lowest peak cardiac enzyme levels (all p≤0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the change of hemodynamic function (cardiac index) between the three groups (p = 0.158). Ten-year survival for OPCAB, ONBHCAB, and ONCAB were 80.5%, 75.9%, and 73.7%, respectively. OPCAB was associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk and MACE when compared to others (Mortality HR = 0.33, p = 0.001, MACE HR = 0.52, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

OPCAB implementation resulted in a lower occurrence of postoperative ischemic injury than ONCAB and ONBHCAB. No differences in postoperative hemodynamic function in all three techniques were observed. OPCAB respectively were preferable techniques beneficial for long-term outcomes.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes in patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction: inverse probability weighted study

Objective

In this study we aimed to compare on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes in patients presented with low left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) as a high-risk group of patients.

Methods

In this registry-based study from 2014 and 2016, all patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF less than 35%) were included and followed until 2020. The median follow-up period was 47.83 [38.41, 55.19] months. Off pump CABG (OPCABG) was compared with on-pump CABG (ONCABG) in terms of mid-term non-fatal cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality. Propensity score method (with inverse probability weighting technique) was used to compare these two groups.

Results

From 14,237 patients who underwent isolated CABG, 2055 patients with EF ≤ 35% were included; 1705 in ONCABG and 350 patients in OPCABG groups. Although OPCABG was associated with lower risk of 30-days mortality (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.021; Confidence Interval [CI] 95% [0.01, 0.05], P < 0.001); there was no significant difference between OPCABG and ONCABG in term of mid-term mortality and non-fatal CVEs ((Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.822; 95%CI [0.605, 1.112], p = 0.208) and (HR: 1.246; 95%CI [0.805, 1.929], p = 0.324), respectively). Patients with more than three traditional coronary artery disease risk factors, had more favorable outcomes (in terms of mid-term mortality) if underwent OPCABG (HR: 0.420; 95%CI [0.178, 0.992], p = 0.048).

Conclusion

OPCABG was associated with lower risk of 30-days mortality; however, mid-term outcomes were comparable in both OPCABG and ONCABG techniques.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02895-0.

In-hospital mortality of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Iranian population

Background

Historically, coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with a higher mortality rate in patients with severe heart failure. This study aimed to assess the in-hospital mortality of CABG in patients with severe heart failure in Iranian patients and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective descriptive study enrolled patients with severe heart failure who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery from 2015 to 2020 in Madani Hospital, affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

Results

A total of 865 consecutive patients with a mean age of 60.65 ± 10.00 were enrolled in the study. Of all participants, 175 were female (20.4%), and 684 were male. The overall mortality rate was 9.5%. In the univariate analysis, predictors of ICU mortality were age, female sex, DM, and renal failure (P value < 0.05). None of the factors studied was an independent predictor of ICU mortality in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This study established that although coronary artery bypass surgery is reported to have low mortality and postoperative morbidity in patients with severe heart failure, there are still centers that face higher mortality rates in these patients. Improving these patients' outcomes would be possible through identifying the associated risk factors and pre-and postoperative management.

On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison

Objective

On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB.

Methods

From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function.

Results

The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions

OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in low ejection fraction: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the number of patients with reduced ejection fraction secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) increases, coronary artery bypass grafting is being used with increasing frequency. In this review, we summarize the different operative considerations in this vulnerable patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preoperative optimization with mechanical circulatory support devices, especially in the setting of hemodynamic instability, can reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. The advantage of advanced techniques, such as off-pump CABG and multiple arterial grafting remains unclear. Concomitant procedures, such as ablation for atrial fibrillation remain important considerations that should be tailored to the individual patients risk profile.

SUMMARY

Despite improvements in perioperative care of patients undergoing CABG, patients with a reduced ejection fraction remain at elevated risk of major morbidity and mortality. Preoperative optimization and careful selection of intraoperative techniques can lead to improved outcomes.

On-Pump Beating Heart versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Short-Term Follow-up Outcomes of a Single Center

Background and Aim: Novel surgical approaches are gaining attention in an attempt to overcome possible adverse events following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This single-center study aimed to evaluate and compare the early postoperative outcomes of on-pump beating-heart (OPBH-CABG) versus off-pump CABG surgery in similar risk groups with a total number of 1–2 grafts.

Methods: The records of a total of 229 patients who underwent non-emergency, primary, isolated, either OPBH-CABG (n = 32) or off-pump CABG (n = 197) surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Reported outcome measures included baseline data, the number of coronary artery grafts, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, time of extubation from mechanical ventilation, duration of stay in the coronary ICU and hospital, as well as early postoperative complications, in-hospital and early postoperative mortality.

Results: The groups were identical with regards to age and BMI. The patients in the off-pump group received a higher number of grafts (1.84 ± 0.36 vs. 1.18 ± 0.39, p <0.0001). The OPBH-CABG group had a higher Euroscore II score (2.514 ± 1.68 vs. 1.706 ± 1.93, p = 0.021). The time to extubation after the surgery, postoperative length of ICU stay, and total length of hospital stay were similar between the groups (p = 0.2228; p = 0.098; p = 0.717, respectively). The incidence of arrythmia and atrial fibrillation was higher in the on-pump group (12.5% vs. 2.53%, p <0.05). One patient in the on-pump, and four patients in the off-pump groups deceased due to postoperative complications.

Conclusions: OPBH-CABG surgery is comparable to off-pump CABG in terms of early postoperative outcomes. In patients who underwent OPBH-CABG, the risk of arrythmia and atrial fibrillation should be of concern and solved with optimal strategies.

On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Operative technique for surgical myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients remains an argument of debate. On-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with cardioplegic arrest and off-pump CABG have intrinsic limitations. The hybrid approach of on-pump beating-heart CABG (OPBHC) has been proposed over the years with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis intends to summarize the contemporary literature.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through major electronic databases. The systematic review provided a total of 279 articles, of those 17 studies were included in the present study.

RESULTS

Compared with on-pump CABG, OPBHC patients showed a preoperative higher risk profile but had reduced early mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.97) and reduced postoperative stroke (RR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.91). Also, interesting trends towards reduced postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use (RR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.31-1.01) and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.22-1.07) were observed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were similar between OPBHC and off-pump CABG, but limited data are available. The risk of incomplete revascularization in OPBHC is lower than off-pump CABG (RR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.87) but higher than conventional on-pump CABG (RR, 1.71, 95% CI, 1.23-2.39).

CONCLUSION

OPBHC is an effective technique to perform surgical revascularization in high-risk patients as preventing haemodynamic deterioration and guaranteeing adequate end-organ perfusion. OPBHC represents an alternative technique to on-pump and off-pump CABG, in those cases in which complications deriving from cardioplegic arrest or manipulation of the heart are more likely. For these reasons, OPBHC might be useful in patients with recent myocardial infarction or with left ventricular dysfunction.

Impacts of Skeletonized Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Risk of Deep Sternal Wound Infection

This single-center study aimed to evaluate the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) following skeletonized bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) harvest in a Chinese cohort. Using propensity score matching, this study also provided a present-day assessment of the impacts of skeletonized BIMA grafting versus skeletonized single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting on early outcomes.From January 2014 to December 2017, 2403 eligible patients were entered into either a BIMA group (n = 368) or a SIMA group (n = 2035). The incidence of DSWI was recorded. Analysis of early outcomes was further performed for propensity score-matched (1:1) cohorts.The BIMA group received a similar incidence of DSWI as did the SIMA group (1.6% versus 0.9%, P = 0.247). No significant differences between subgroup diabetic-BIMA, subgroup nondiabetic-BIMA, subgroup diabetic-SIMA, and subgroup nondiabetic-SIMA were found regarding the incidence of DSWI (2.0%, 1.4%, 1.0%, and 0.7%, respectively; P > 0.05 between groups). After matching, treatment type (skeletonized BIMA grafting versus skeletonized SIMA grafting) was not an independent risk factor for postoperative DSWI (OR = 1.309, 95% CI 0.897-2.714, P = 0.704) or predictors of other early outcomes. Additionally, the two matched groups shared similar early outcomes (including postoperative DSWI), regardless of whether or not the merger with diabetes (all P > 0.05).Skeletonized BIMA harvest as compared with skeletonized SIMA harvest was not associated with an increased risk of DSWI, regardless of whether or not the merger with diabetes. Patients with skeletonized BIMA grafting received similar surgical mortality and major postoperative morbidity as did matched patients with skeletonized SIMA grafting.

Simultaneous endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm and coronary artery bypass grafting in an octogenarian: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is commonly associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in elderly patients. When severe CAD requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with an impending AAA in a high-risk patient, the options for the suitable timing of CABG and AAA repair strategy (one-stage or two-stage) are still being debated.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

An 87-year-old man with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a giant abdominal aortic aneurysm was transferred to our centre. Coronary angiography revealed triple-vessel coronary disease, and computed tomography confirmed a giant infrarenal fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm 9 cm in maximal diameter. We simultaneously performed endovascular aneurysm repair prior to on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the 15th postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Combined endovascular aneurysm repair and on-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting in a one-stage operation is a promising strategy to improve therapeutic efficiency in octogenarians. More studies are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of one-stage and two-stage operations to treat concomitant coronary artery disease and aortovascular pathology in the high-risk octogenarian patients.

Long-Term Patency Rate of Radial Artery Conduits in Chinese Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Consensus has yet to emerge among experts as to whether the radial artery (RA) conduit was superior to the saphenous vein (SV) graft for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in terms of long-term patency. This study aimed to evaluate long-term patency of the RA conduit compared to the SV conduit for off-pump CABG, and to screen the independent predictors of long-term RA graft failure.Patients < 80 years of age with graftable triple-vessel disease undergoing non-emergent, primary, isolated off-pump CABG, using both the RA and the SV conduits, were reviewed. Graft patency, all-cause mortality and repeat revascularization were followed-up. The independent predictors of long-term RA graft failure were identified.A total of 296 out of 320 eligible patients (42 females, 61.3 ± 9.9 years old) received follow-up with an observed period of 93.4 ± 16.5 months. All-cause mortality was 14.5%, and repeat revascularization was conducted on 6 RA grafts and 9 SV grafts. Superior patency of the RA grafts compared to the SV grafts was observed (84.4% versus 78.5%, P = 0.035). Independent predictors of long-term RA graft failure included proximal stenosis of target right coronaries < 90% (OR = 2.35, 95%CI 1.41-5.82) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.66, 95%CI 1.17-4.26).The RA graft had a superior long-term patency than the SV graft. Long-term patency of the RA graft may be poor in diabetics or in the case of proximal stenosis of target right coronary <90%. (Trial registration: ChiCTR-OCH-1200212).

Moderate Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

The benefits of concomitant mitral valve procedure (MVP) for treating moderate chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have not been clearly established. This study aimed to determine the incidence of moderate or more residual mitral regurgitation (MR) following CABG plus MVP for moderate chronic IMR, and to evaluate the impacts of concomitant MVP vs. CABG alone on clinical outcomes based on propensity-matched data.All eligible patients were entered into either the MVP group (CABG plus MVP, n = 184) or CABG group (CABG alone, n = 162). Moderate or more residual MR rate was investigated, and in-hospital and follow-up outcomes between the groups were compared after matching.Moderate or more residual MR rate was 11.4% at 1 year and 22.9% at 2 years after CABG plus MVP, respectively. Patients in the MVP group as compared with the CABG group had significantly lower moderate or more residual MR rates at various postoperative time points (all P < 0.001). Grouping was not an independent risk factor for in-hospital adverse events in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Also, grouping was a significant variable related to moderate or more residual MR rate and NYHA class III-IV at the latest follow-up in Cox regression analysis (HR = 0.391, 95% CI 0.114-0.628; HR = 0.419, 95% CI 0.233-0.819, respectively).Concomitant MVP as compared with CABG alone for treating moderate chronic IMR was associated with a reduction in moderate or more residual MR rate and an improvement in NYHA functional status, with no increase in in-hospital adverse events or follow-up death.

Impacts of incomplete revascularization following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on clinical outcomes of patients with triple-vessel lesions: insights from a single-center study of propensity-matched data

Background

Although complete revascularization (CR) has been a goal of surgical revascularization, comorbidities and anatomical variables often conspire against a successful surgical CR. Currently, incomplete revascularization (IR) has been also considered as an acceptable strategy of surgical revascularization in some categories of patients. In the past decade, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) became one of the mainstream procedures of CABG due to its low incidence of perioperative complications. However, the magnitude of the impacts of off-pump IR on clinical outcomes of patients with triple-vessel disease remained unclear.

Methods

Eligible patients who received isolated off-pump CABG with left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in our institute from January 2011 to December 2013 were entered into an IR group or a CR group. The incidence of off-pump IR was investigated. In-hospital and follow-up outcomes were also evaluated by adjusting baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (1:1).

Results

A total of 1,349 patients (268 in the IR group and 1,081 in the CR group) were analyzed. The off-pump IR rate was 19.9%. Using matching propensity scores, 234 pairs were successfully established in a 1:1 manner. The two matched groups had similar surgical mortality and major postoperative morbidity. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that IR was not an independent predictor of cardiac death at follow-up (HR =1.215; 95% CI, 0.883-2.164; P=0.371). The two matched groups received a similar cumulative survival freedom from repeat revascularization in Kaplan-Meier curves (χ²=2.120, log-rank P=0.145).

Conclusions

CR can be achieved in the majority of off-pump CABG cases. Compared with off-pump CR, off-pump IR with the LIMA grafting to the LAD was associated with acceptable clinical outcomes.

Early and Medium Outcomes of On-Pump Beating-Heart versus Off-Pump CABG in Patients with Moderate Left Ventricular Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart (OPBH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and off-pump CABG (OPCABG) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 40%.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of ischemic heart disease patients with LVEF between 30% and 40% who underwent surgical revascularization from January 2013 to December 2017. Patients were divided into OPBH group (n=44) and OPCABG group (n=68), according to the surgical method. Clinical material with early and medium outcomes were investigated and compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar baseline. Two OPBH patients and 3 OPCABG patients died in the hospital, which had no statistical significance (P>0.05). OPBH patients received a greater number of grafts (3.74±0.84) and presented more improved LVEF (45.92±7.11%) than OPCABG patients (3.36±0.80) and (42.81±9.29%), respectively, which had statistical significance (P<0.05). An increased amount of drainage during the first 12 hours was found in the OPBH group (P<0.05). Reoperation for bleeding, duration of mechanic ventilation, and other early outcomes had no statistical significance between the two groups. During the medium-time follow-up, OPBH patients showed significantly lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival time (P=0.049) than OPCABG patients.

CONCLUSION

The OPBH technique was a safe and an acceptable alternative for surgical revascularization in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction which provided better mid-term MACE-free survival compared with OPCABG.

Off-pump onlay-patch grafting using the left internal mammary artery for a diffusely diseased left anterior descending artery: in-hospital and mid-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate the in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of the off-pump onlay-patch grafting procedure using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) for a diffusely diseased left anterior descending artery (LAD) and to identify the risk factors for postoperative LIMA graft failure in a single-center retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients (52 males, 65.7±9.0 years) undergoing LAD arteriotomy with or without concomitant endarterectomy, followed by reconstruction using LIMA onlay-patch at the time of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at our institute from January 2014 to December 2016 were reviewed. The operative mortality, major postoperative morbidity, follow-up all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events at follow-up, and postoperative LIMA graft patency were analyzed. The risk factors for postoperative LIMA graft failure on the basis of baseline and surgical characteristics were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen (28.6%) patients underwent concomitant open LAD endarterectomy. The operative mortality rate was 1.6%. Major postoperative morbidity included perioperative myocardial infarction (3.2%), low cardiac output (1.6%), and reoperation for bleeding (1.6%). During the follow-up period of 24.2±9.5 months, all-cause mortality was 1.7% and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 6.8%. No repeat revascularization was recorded. In total, 88.1% of LIMA grafts showed FitzGibbon grade A patency determined by noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography during follow-up. In addition, concomitant LAD endarterectomy and intraoperative LIMA graft flow were found to be independent risk factors for mid-term LIMA graft failure by multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio=2.681, 95% confidence interval: 1.314-9.856, P=0.007 and odds ratio=0.932, 95% confidence interval: 0.791-0.976, P=0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Revascularization of a diffusely diseased LAD using the off-pump LIMA onlay-patch technique results in encouraging clinical outcomes with favorable angiographic results. Concomitant LAD endarterectomy and intraoperative LIMA graft flow are associated with the risk of postoperative LIMA graft failure.

Sequential Saphenous Vein Coronary Bypass Grafting

The enormous majority of previous reports focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of sequential saphenous vein (SV) coronary bypass grafting; however, no reports to date have revealed concern regarding the impacts of the number of distal anastomoses of sequential SV grafting on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impacts of three versus two distal anastomoses per single SV conduit on SV graft patency after off-pump CABG, and to determine the independent risk factors for sequential SV graft failure.From January 2011 to December 2014, 1320 eligible patients were assigned to either a triple group (three distal anastomoses of sequential SV grafting, n = 758) or a double group (two distal anastomoses of sequential SV grafting, n = 562). The primary endpoint was over a 2-year follow-up SV graft failure after off-pump CABG.The triple and double group received a similar total patency rate of sequential SV conduits (86.5% versus 87.1%, P = 0.757). The number of distal anastomoses of sequential SV grafting (three versus two) was not a predictive factor for the follow-up graft failure of sequential SV conduits (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66-2.29, P = 0.137). Moreover, the two groups received a similar follow-up survival freedom from repeat revascularization (χ² = 1.881, log-rank P = 0.170).Three versus two distal anastomoses per single SV conduit received a similar SV graft patency. The number of distal anastomoses of sequential SV grafting was not an independent risk factor for graft failure.

Sequential Grafting of in Situ Skeletonized Left Internal Mammary Artery to the Left Coronary System

Sequential grafting may be an effective way to maximize the benefits of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) conduit. Despite increasing clinical application, the strategy of sequential LIMA grafting has not been proven its superiority. This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of sequential grafting of in situ skeletonized LIMA to the left coronary system.According to the use of sequential or separate LIMA grafting, 1505 eligible patients were assigned to a sequential group (n = 230) and a control group (n = 1275). According to sequential LIMA graft configurations, patients with sequential LIMA grafting were divided into a DOM subgroup (n = 113) and a DLAD subgroup (n = 117). The clinical outcomes and LIMA graft patency were investigated and compared.Sequential LIMA grafting compared with separate LIMA grafting was not an independent predictor either of in-hospital adverse events or follow-up survival free from repeat revascularization during the follow-up period of 32.4 ± 8.5 months. Sequential LIMA grafting had similar LIMA graft patency with separate LIMA grafting (99.5% of 1st sequential sites and 97.7% of 2nd sites versus 98.2% of LIMA-LAD grafts) at 32.3 ± 8.5 months after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Additionally, the two subgroups received similar mid-term clinical outcomes and graft patency of LIMA segments.Sequential grafting of in situ skeletonized LIMA to the left coronary system resulted in excellent clinical outcomes and graft patency. The two sequential LIMA graft configurations received similar clinical outcomes and graft patency.