Single-port VATS combined with non-indwelling drain in ERAS: a retrospective study

[Enhanced recovery after lung resection in high-risk patients]

OBJECTIVE

To study the possibilities of the ERAS program and immediate results in high-risk patients undergoing lung resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospective study included 76 high-risk patients. All patients required lobar resection for various lung diseases. The risk of postoperative complications and mortality was stratified using the Thoracoscore and Thoracic Revised Cardiac Risk Index systems, as well as the American Society of Anesthesiologists Outcome Prediction Scale. At all perioperative stages, we assessed the possibilities for accelerated recovery and postoperative complications using the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality System.

RESULTS

Patients were characterized by multiple comorbidities requiring long-term and individual preoperative correction. This prevented adherence to a single protocol at the outpatient stage. We intraoperatively observed severe adhesive process up to complete obliteration of pleural cavity that complicated the use of minimally invasive technologies. Lung tissue was characterized by emphysematous lesions and reduced elasticity that caused prolonged air release and formation of residual cavities. These features required two pleural drains in 42 (52.3%) cases that increased hospital-stay. Multimodal analgesia and early activation with rehabilitation were optimal elements of ERAS. Various postoperative abnormalities developed in 31 (40.8%) patients, mortality rate was 7.9% (n=6). Minor and serious complications prevailed (21 (27.6%) cases). Their correction was effective and not accompanied by fatal outcomes. Critical complications occurred in 10 (13.1%) patients and caused fatal outcomes in 6 (7.9%) cases.

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocol among high-risk patients in thoracic surgery is possible in the form of separate elements included in perioperative support.

[Application and Research Progress of Video Double-lumen Tube in Thoracic Surgery]

The rapid development and promotion of minimally invasive thoracic surgery represented by video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery has gradually replaced traditional thoracic surgery technique as the primary choice for the treatment of pulmonary nodules, including early lung cancer. With the clinical application of double-lumen bronchial catheters, the realization of one-lung ventilation technology not only provides a solid anesthesia foundation for the popularization of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, but also provides a guarantee for the rapid and smooth implementation of the operation. However, compared with single-lumen bronchial catheters, the diameter of the double-lumen bronchial catheter is thicker, and the tube body is hard and difficult to shape, which brings inconvenience to anesthesia intubation. The bronchial structure is different, and the incidence of dislocation during anesthesia intubation is also high. With the gradual clinical use of video double-lumen tube (VDLT), it has become a hot spot in thoracic surgery in recent years. This article reviews the application and research progress of VDLT in thoracic surgery.
.

Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways

The introduction of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has led to a considerable paradigm shift towards evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care. Such pathways are now widely implemented in a variety of surgical specialties, with largely positive results. In this narrative review, we summarize the principles, components and implementation of ERPs, focusing on recent developments in the field. We also discuss ‘special cases’ in ERPs, including: surgery in frail patients; emergency procedures; and patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19).