Survival of patients with rare diseases: a population-based study in Tuscany (Italy)

Risk Factors for Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Hospitalized Children

BACKGROUND

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infants and young children. Starting in December 2010, RSV monoclonal antibody (RSV mAb) was endorsed by Taiwan National Health Insurance and given to children with prematurity and/or congenital heart diseases, which are considered high-risk factors for severe RSV diseases. Investigating other important contributing risk factors is warranted.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study at National Taiwan University Hospital to determine the rate of severe outcomes among children hospitalized due to RSV infection from 2008 to 2018. Adjusted for age, sex and birth cohorts born before and after RSV mAb endorsement, we identified risk factors for severe RSV infection, defined as the requirement of invasive ventilator support.

RESULTS

There were 1985 admissions due to RSV infections. Among them, 66 patients (3.3%) had severe RSV infection. The proportion of severe RSV infections decreased significantly after RSV mAb endorsement. Multivariable analysis revealed that age <1.5 months and cardiovascular and congenital/genetic diseases were high-risk underlying conditions. In addition, bacterial coinfections, elevated creatinine levels and initial abnormal chest radiograph findings posed warning signs for severe RSV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Children younger than 1.5 months of age with cardiovascular or congenital/genetic diseases were predisposed to severe RSV infection and might benefit from RSV mAb prophylaxis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Whole-Genome vs Whole-Exome Sequencing Among Children With Suspected Genetic Disorders

Importance

The diagnosis of rare diseases and other genetic conditions can be daunting due to vague or poorly defined clinical features that are not recognized even by experienced clinicians. Next-generation sequencing technologies, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES), have greatly enhanced the diagnosis of genetic diseases by expanding the ability to sequence a large part of the genome, rendering a cost-effectiveness comparison between them necessary.

Objective

To assess the cost-effectiveness of WGS compared with WES and conventional testing in children with suspected genetic disorders.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this economic evaluation, a bayesian Markov model was implemented from January 1 to June 30, 2023. The model was developed using data from a cohort of 870 pediatric patients with suspected genetic disorders who were enrolled and underwent testing in the Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. The robustness of the model was assessed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and value of information analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall costs, number of definitive diagnoses, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per diagnosis were measured. The cost-effectiveness analyses involved 4 comparisons: first-tier WGS with standard of care; first-tier WGS with first-tier WES; first-tier WGS with second-tier WES; and first-tier WGS with second-tier WGS.

Results

The ages of the 870 participants ranged from 0 to 18 years (539 [62%] girls). The results of the analysis suggested that adopting WGS as a first-tier strategy would be cost-effective compared with all other explored options. For all threshold levels above €29 800 (US $32 408) per diagnosis that were tested up to €50 000 (US $54 375) per diagnosis, first-line WGS vs second-line WES strategy (ie, 54.6%) had the highest probability of being cost-effective, followed by first-line vs second-line WGS (ie, 54.3%), first-line WGS vs the standard of care alternative (ie, 53.2%), and first-line WGS vs first-line WES (ie, 51.1%). Based on sensitivity analyses, these estimates remained robust to assumptions and parameter uncertainty.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this economic evaluation encourage the development of policy changes at various levels (ie, macro, meso, and micro) of international health systems to ensure an efficient adoption of WGS in clinical practice and its equitable access.

[Rare diseases in anesthesia : Knowledge mining and core points of perioperative anesthesiological care]

Due to refined and new diagnostic possibilities and improved medical care, in the future anesthesiologists will be more frequently confronted with patients suffering from rare diseases. As the physicians providing perioperative care often have little or no experience with the diseases of such patients, the access to high-quality specific literature is essential. In this respect they must be able to assess and classify the quality of the information which is predominantly available online, especially as when evidence-based knowledge is available, it is only available to a very limited extent. Patients with rare diseases mostly present with recurring problem constellations. A systematic assignment to the most important problem areas (airway, circulation, metabolism, etc.) as well as a structured and interdisciplinary approach are decisive for a successful perioperative treatment of these patients. Due to low prevalence, lack of personal experience and lack of evidence-based data, anesthesia in patients with SE is an absolute challenge, especially in time-critical situations.

Estimating mortality in rare diseases using a population-based registry, 2002 through 2019

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases (RD) are a heterogeneous group of diseases, sharing aspects of complexity. Prognosis is variable, even in individuals with the same disease. Real-world data on RD as a whole are scarce. The aim of this study is to provide data on mortality and survival for a substantial group of RD deriving from a population-based registry, which covers the Veneto region in Italy (4.9 million inhabitants).

RESULTS

During the study period, 3367 deaths occurred, mainly in males (53.9%), elderly patients (63.5%) and patients with diseases having a reported prevalence of 1-9/100000 (65.6%). When standardizing by age, the mortality ratio was higher in RD patients than in the general population, SMR = 1.93 (95% CI 1.84-2.11), with an observed gender difference, 2.01 (95% CI 1.88-2.29) in females and 1.86 (95% CI 1.73-2.10) in males. The lowest survival rates are experienced by patients with rare neurologic diseases, rare skin diseases and rare systemic or rheumatologic diseases, 58%, 68% and 81%, respectively, after a 15-year observation period. It should be noted that only 18% of patients diagnosed with motor neuron diseases were alive after 15 years from diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite progress in diagnosis, treatment and care in recent years, RD patients globally have higher mortality rates and reduced survival compared to the general population, with specific variations according to gender, age and disease group.

Rare diseases: why is a rapid referral to an expert center so important?

BACKGROUND

Patients with rare diseases usually go through years of diagnostic odysseys. The large number of rare diseases and the associated lack of expertise pose a major challenge to physicians. There are few physicians dealing with patients with rare diseases and they usually work in a limited number of specialized centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of an expert center.

METHODS

The diagnostic pathway of 78 patients of the outpatient clinic for rare inflammatory systemic diseases with renal involvement was analyzed retrospectively. For this purpose, each examination day was documented with the corresponding examinations performed from the onset of initial symptoms. Three time points were considered: The time when patients first visited a physician with symptoms, the time when patients consulted an expert, and the time when they received the correct diagnosis. In addition, it was documented whether the diagnosis could be made without the expert, or only with the help of the expert. The examinations that confirmed the diagnosis were also documented for each patient.

RESULTS

A correct diagnosis was made without the help of the expert in only 21% of cases. Each patient visited an average of 6 physicians before consulting the expert. Targeted diagnostics enabled the expert to make the correct diagnosis with an average of seven visits, or one inpatient stay. However, referral to the expert took an average of 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The data show that rapid and targeted diagnostics were possible in the expert center due to the available expertise and the interdisciplinary exchange. Early diagnosis is of great importance for many patients, as an early and correct therapy can be decisive for the course of the disease.

Real-world use of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in rare disease (RD) patients: A population-based registry study

Background: Despite calls for the use of real-world data, the rare diseases (RD) treatment landscape suffers from a scarcity of data referred to orphan medicinal products (OMP) use at the population level.

Objectives: We aim to describe the characteristics and patterns of utilization of OMP in a sizable group of RD patients globally monitored by an area-based rare diseases registry located in the Veneto region, Italy, during a 3-year period (1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021).

Methods: A list of OMP (n = 60) was assembled for study purposes, according to extensive criteria with regard to the status of orphan designation and of national reimbursement decisions.

Results: OMP prescriptions involved 1,010 patients, corresponding to the 2.3% of all the patients monitored by the RD registry. Nearly one out of five (22.8%) was a pediatric patient at the time of the first prescription. OMP use interested a limited proportion (17.5%) of diseases approaching the rarity threshold, having a prevalence of less than five per 10,000, while individuals affected by these more common rare conditions represented 49% of all the patients receiving an OMP prescription. A clustering effect of OMP use was observed in selected groups of diseases, mainly, neurological, hematological, and hereditary metabolic ones. Medication plans including an OMP show in the 45.9% of the cases a high level of complexity, both in terms of nature and number of co-prescribed treatments. Off-label use interested 15.3% (n = 155) of all the RD patients with at least an OMP prescription during the study period.

Conclusion: Data collected in a real-world setting through population-based registries globally monitoring RD patients, including related medication plans, have the potential to identify which diseases, and thus patients, have less benefit from the advent of OMP so far. Furthermore, in the rapidly evolving RD therapeutic landscape, they can help understand which therapeutic areas are most in need of investment to address existing unmet care needs.

Caracterización y factores asociados a la mortalidad debida a enfermedades huérfanas en Chile, 2002-2017

Introducción.

Las enfermedades huérfanas se caracterizan por su baja prevalencia, comúnmente son de evolución crónica, debilitantes y potencialmente mortales.

Objetivo.

Determinar las características y los factores asociados a la mortalidad por enfermedades huérfanas en Chile, entre 2002 y 2017.

Materiales y métodos.

Es un estudio transversal y analítico a partir de datos secundarios oficiales del Departamento de Estadística e Información en Salud (DEIS) del Ministerio de Salud de Chile. Se calcularon las tasas de mortalidad específica, y las ajustadas por sexo y edad. Se efectuó un análisis de normalidad mediante la prueba de Kolmogórov-Smirnov. Se aplicaron la prueba de ji al cuadrado de independencia para las asociaciones y el análisis de regresión logística multivariada para determinar la probabilidad de muerte.

Resultados.

Durante el periodo de estudio, 10.718 defunciones se atribuyeron a enfermedades huérfanas; 53,2 % ocurrieron en mujeres. La tasa media anual de mortalidad fue de 3,9 por 100.000 habitantes: 4,1 en mujeres y 3,8 en hombres. Las principales causas de muerte, en mujeres, fueron enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, anencefalia, hepatitis autoinmunitaria y, en hombres, enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob, distrofia muscular y anencefalia. Las mujeres tienen 1,75 más veces la posibilidad de fallecer por este grupo de enfermedades en comparación con los hombres (OR ajustado=1,75; IC_95% 1,69-1,82). La mayor probabilidad de morir se presentó en los menores de 0 a 4 años (OR ajustado=15,30; IC_95% 14,10-19,20).

Conclusión.

En Chile, las mujeres constituyeron el grupo de población de mayor riesgo de morir por enfermedades huérfanas durante los años 2002 y 2017.

Criteria to define rare diseases and orphan drugs: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Rare diseases (RDs) are often chronic and progressive life-threatening medical conditions that affect a low percentage of the population compared with other diseases. These conditions can be treated with medications known as orphan drugs (ODs). Unfortunately, there is no universal definition of RDs or ODs. This systematic review (SR) will identify the quantitative and qualitative criteria and the underlying rationale used internationally to define RDs and ODs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol follows the conventions for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (2015 guidelines). A SR will be conducted, including a search of the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, GreyLit and OpenGrey. Eligible publications will be selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Extracted data will be analysed using thematic and content analyses of qualitative descriptors, whereas quantitative data will be analysed descriptively and reported in the form of frequencies and percentages.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is required since this SR focuses on the secondary analysis of data retrieved from the scientific literature. The outcomes of this SR will be published as part of a PhD thesis, presented at conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021252701.

Healthcare Burden of Rare Diseases: A Population-Based Study in Tuscany (Italy)

Patients with rare diseases (RDs) need tailored, continuous, and multidisciplinary hospital care. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyse the healthcare burden of RD patients using a multi-database approach, by linking the data of the Rare Diseases Registry of Tuscany with the regional hospital discharge database. The study population included 21,354 patients diagnosed with a RD between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017. The healthcare burden was evaluated for all the RDs during 2009–2018 period. The hospitalisation rate (per 1000) decreased over the years, ranging from 606.9 in 2009 (95% CI: 589.2–625.0) to 443.0 in 2018 (95% CI: 433.2–453.0). A decrease in the average length of stay (LOS) was observed in the earlier years, followed by an increase up to a steady trend (8.3 days in 2018). The patients with RDs of metabolism and the genitourinary system showed the highest hospitalisation rate (903.3 and 644.0 per 1000, respectively). The patients with rare immune system disorders and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue showed the highest LOS (9.7 and 9.5 days, respectively). The methodological approach presented in this population-based study makes it possible to estimate the healthcare burden of RDs, which is crucial in the decision-making and planning aimed at improving patient care.

How to optimize the perioperative care of patients with orphan diseases: what the anesthesiologist needs to know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite a very low individual prevalence, rare or orphan diseases are estimated to collectively affect as much as 6-8% of the general population. These diseases provide a challenge to anesthetic delivery because of the lack of evidence to guide optimal management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The expansion of information technology has made facts about individual orphan diseases easier to find. Several reputable websites, hosted variously by anesthetic societies, rare disease organizations, and government agencies, provide information about rare diseases and anesthetic management.

SUMMARY

Improved access to resources of knowledge may allow for more informed anesthetic management of orphan diseases. The combination of a thorough review of existing knowledge about individual diseases and a structured anesthetic assessment may assist in the delivery of well tolerated anesthetic care of rare conditions.