Factor VIII replacement prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A transitioning to adults: a systematic literature review

A post hoc analysis of PROTECT VIII kids assessing long-term efficacy and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol in adolescents with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The safety and efficacy of the extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) product damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027, Jivi®) has been demonstrated in the PROTECT VIII Kids study (NCT01775618), where male previously-treated patients (PTPs) aged <12 years old with severe haemophilia A and ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) were treated prophylactically. The PROTECT VIII Kids extension study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of damoctocog alfa pegol in the same population.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term impact of damoctocog alfa pegol in a post hoc subgroup analysis of adolescent patients in the PROTECT VIII Kids study and its extension from 12th birthday onwards.

METHODS

The current analysis included PTPs aged ≥12 years old, who remained in the extension for ≥6 months following their 12th birthday. The observation period was defined as the time from 12th birthday to the end of the extension period; all data from this birthday were included whether in the main study or extension phase. The main efficacy variable was annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and the main safety variable was the frequency of inhibitor development.

RESULTS

This subgroup analysis comprised 25 patients. Median observation time after 12th birthday was 3.2 years. Median total/joint/spontaneous ABRs in the observation period were 1.7/0.7/0.3, respectively. Safety findings were consistent with those reported for the overall study population; no confirmed FVIII inhibitors or anti-drug antibodies were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Damoctocog alfa pegol is efficacious with a favourable safety profile in adolescents with haemophilia A, supporting its long-term use in children and adolescents.

Current Status and Challenges in Delivering Comprehensive Care for Patients with Hemophilia

The importance of comprehensive care as a treatment strategy for patients with hemophilia is recognized worldwide. Comprehensive care entails addressing full spectrum of medical and psychological aspects impacting both patients and their families. The primary objective of comprehensive care for individuals with hemophilia is to enable them to lead their daily lives just as anyone else would. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to have a positive and collaborative approach across various healthcare disciplines. This extends beyond clinical specialists, encompassing pediatricians, hematologists, orthopedic surgeons, dental and oral surgeons, gynecologists, nurses, physical therapists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals from diverse fields. This review article discusses the current status and challenges associated with comprehensive care for patients with hemophilia. We categorize these challenges as follows: hemophilic arthritis, rehabilitation, oral care, transitioning from pediatric to adult care, addressing carrier issues, and providing psychological care. There is still substantial work to be undertaken in addressing these hurdles and advancing the quality of comprehensive care for hemophilia patients.

Barriers to prophylactic treatment among patients with haemophilia A in Shandong Province, China: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Haemophilia A is a rare, hereditary haemorrhagic disease that manifests as induced spontaneous bleeding and leads to disability or premature death in severe cases. Prophylactic treatment is optimal for patients to prevent uncontrolled bleeding and reduce the severity of the injury. However, little is known about the use of prophylactic treatment among patients with haemophilia A in China, especially barriers that predispose them to low or non-adherence. In this study, we explore the barriers to the prophylactic treatment of patients with haemophilia A.

METHOD

We used personal interviews and focus groups to collect the data and analysed the data through thematic analysis. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit our participants. We continued recruiting participants until data saturation was reached from the thematic analysis. Ultimately, we obtained 37 participants, among whom 19 participated in personal interviews and 18 participated in focus groups (i.e., 3 focus groups with 6 participants each).

RESULTS

Three themes and nine subthemes were identified from the thematic analysis. Nine subthemes (i.e., perceived barriers) emerged from the analysis, which were further clustered into three themes: (1) poor primary health care, (2) inadequate financial support, and (3) a lack of patient-centred care.

CONCLUSION

The findings presented in this descriptive qualitative study offer a unique view of Chinese patients with haemophilia A and their barriers to prophylactic treatment. Our findings not only provide an in-depth understanding of barriers to prophylactic treatment encountered by Chinese patients with haemophilia A but also address the urgent need to strengthen primary care, provide adequate financial support, and establish patient-centred care for these suffering patients.

Quantifying Benefit-Risk Trade-Offs Toward Prophylactic Treatment Among Adult Patients With Hemophilia A in China: Discrete Choice Experiment Study

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A is a chronic condition that requires meticulous treatment and management. Patient preferences for prophylactic treatment can substantially influence adherence, outcomes, and quality of life, yet these preferences remain underexplored, particularly in China.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the preferences for prophylactic treatment among Chinese adult patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors, considering clinical effectiveness, side effects, dosing mode, and dosing frequency.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit patient preferences for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia. The study was conducted across 7 provinces in China with socioeconomic and geographical diversity. Subgroup analysis was performed according to education level, geographic location, and treatment type, alongside the exploration of benefit-risk trade-offs.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients completed the discrete choice experiment questionnaire, and we included 102 responses for analysis based on predetermined exclusion criteria. The study found that patients prioritized reducing annual bleeding times and avoiding the risk of developing inhibitors over treatment process attributes. Subgroup analysis revealed that lower-educated patients and those from rural areas attached more importance to the dosing mode, likely due to barriers to self-administration. Patients demonstrated a clear understanding of benefit-risk trade-offs, exhibiting a willingness to accept an increased risk of developing inhibitors for improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into the preferences of patients with hemophilia A for prophylactic treatment in China. Understanding these preferences can enhance shared decision-making between patients and clinicians, fostering personalized prophylactic treatment plans that may optimize adherence and improve clinical outcomes.

Quality of life, self-reported outcomes and impact of education among people with moderate and severe hemophilia A: An integrated perspective from a Latin American country

Collecting and interpreting self-reported outcomes among people with hemophilia A supports the understanding of the burden of the disease and its treatment to improve holistic care. However, in Colombia, this information is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the knowledge, perception and burden of hemophilia A from the patients' perspective. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the context of a hemophilia educational bootcamp held from November 29th to December 1st, 2019, in Medellin, Colombia. The bootcamp was organized by a hemophilia patient association responsible for contacting and inviting patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). Information on patients' health beliefs, treatment experiences, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was obtained through focus groups, individual interviews and the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire. A total of 25 moderate or severe PwHA were enrolled in this study and completed the PROBE questionnaire. Acute pain was the most frequently reported symptom, with 88% of the patients reporting the use of pain medication. Difficulty with activities of daily living was reported by 48%. Furthermore, 52% reported having more than 2 spontaneous bleeding events in the last year. Treatment was administered at home for 72% of patients, with regular prophylaxis as the most common treatment regimen. In terms of overall HRQoL, the median EQ-5D VAS score was 80 (IQR: 50-100). PwHA in Colombia still suffer from disease complications related to bleeding events, pain and disability that affect their HRQoL, which highlights the need to develop patient-centered initiatives to improve the wellness of this population.

Most subjectively affected joints in patients with haemophilia - what has changed after 20 years in Germany?

BACKGROUND

In patients with haemophilia (PwH), most frequently affected joints are the ankle, knee and elbow. Due to improved factor therapy in the last decades, these previous findings have to be verified in Germany.

AIM

The aim of this study is to detect the most affected joint, evaluate the significance of the source of pain and determine the point prevalence of back pain in Germany today.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, data of n = 300 patients with severe moderate and mild haemophilia were evaluated regarding the most affected joint, the most common source of pain, and the point prevalence of back pain. An anamnesis questionnaire and the German Pain Questionnaire were used for this assessment.

RESULTS

The most affected joint in German PwH is still the ankle (41%), followed by the knee (27%) and the elbow (11%). The most common source of pain is also the ankle joint (32%). Back pain was also identified as one of the most common sources of pain, which is comparable to the elbow (elbow:15%; back:13%). The point prevalence in PwH for back pain was significantly higher compared to the general German population (P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that the ankle is still the most affected joint and the most common source of pain in Germany. These results also showed the relevance of back pain as a pain source. The evaluations also demonstrated the high point prevalence of back pain in PwH. Future therapies should also focus on the spine because joint changes affect posture.

Medication Adherence for Haemophilia Patients: Outcome of Prophylaxis Treatment Intervention

There have been various Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) set up worldwide with innovative blood factor stewardship programs. Pharmacists have been an extended part of stewardship programs providing daily rounds with haematologists, treatment plan modifications, and dosage adjustment recommendations. The Haemophilia Treatment Centres in Malaysia contain the Haemophilia Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (HMTAC), which recruits adolescent and adult populations. There have not been any adherence studies conducted on pharmacist-steered HMTAC since initiation. The current research generates baseline data to produce treatment plans and intervention measures needed for therapy optimisation in the Malaysian population. This study also explores the relationship between medication adherence, bleeding rate, and comorbidity. This cross-sectional study involved retrospective and prospective data collection using the Validated Haemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale–Prophylaxis (VERITAS-Pro) in Ampang Hospital. The retrospective data collection included reviewing patients’ medical records, bleeding diaries, and VERITAS-Pro questionnaires pre-enrolment to HMTAC. Meanwhile, the prospective data collection was the VERITAS-Pro questionnaire administration post a minimum of three months after enrolment. The inclusion criteria were patients with severe haemophilia A and B with ages ≥18 years with self-administered prophylactic regimens for a minimum period of three months. There were six (5.8%) nonadherent participants, and 97 (94.2%) adhered to the preventive treatment. The subscale dosing and remembering and the total score of the VERITAS-Pro post-HMTAC showed a significant association with ABR. There was a significant mean reduction in the post-HMTAC compared to the pre-HMTAC score for the total score and subscales timing, remembering, skipping, and communicating. There was a significant association between the post-HMTAC adherence status and ABR. It can be concluded that the HMTAC service pioneered by the pharmacists in the National Referral Centre of Haematology is efficient in significantly improving the VERITAS-Pro scoring and then translating it into a high medication adherence rate. This study also highlights a significant correlation between post-HMTAC scores on their adherence with ABR and comorbidities.