1
|
Krantz LB, Stanko-Lopp D, Kuntz M, Wilcox HC. A Guide for Schools on Student-Directed Suicide Prevention Programs Eligible for Implementation under the STANDUP Act, a Rapid Review and Evidence Synthesis. Arch Suicide Res 2024; 28:737-759. [PMID: 37593936 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2247033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
This review evaluates the strength of evidence for school-based mental health and suicide prevention programs that meet the legal eligibility criteria of the Suicide Training and Awareness Nationally Delivered for Universal Prevention Act of 2021 (STANDUP Act). Included studies were aggregated by program and a program's overall body of evidence was evaluated using the LEGEND system. Requirements for implementation were also documented. We identified 29 studies, which, when aggregated, encompassed 12 unique programs that meet the statute's evidence-based criteria. All four outcomes described in the statute were measured, with help-seeking being the most commonly measured. Two programs were assigned a high level of evidence in decreasing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The findings serve as a resource for school officials in identifying evidence-based mental health and suicide prevention programs and understanding the resources needed for implementation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Manchanda T, Stein A, Fazel M. Investigating the Role of Friendship Interventions on the Mental Health Outcomes of Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Range and a Systematic Review of Effectiveness. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2160. [PMID: 36767526 PMCID: PMC9915149 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Friendships are crucial in adolescent development. This paper presents a scoping review, followed by a systematic review, to assess friendship interventions and their impacts on the mental health outcomes of adolescents aged 12-24 years. Studies were included if they incorporated a friend or authentic social group in an intervention dedicated to improving mental health outcomes and well-being. Twenty-four studies were included in the scoping review, and eighteen in the systematic review. Data from 12,815 adolescents were analysed; three prominent themes emerged. The most common theme was promoting mental health literacy, followed by supporting help-seeking, and friendship-building/combating isolation. Most evaluations focused on the individual who had received the intervention, rather than their wider friends who would have been potential contacts and experienced any altered interactions. Of the studies focusing on friendship-building, all had positive short-term outcomes but inconclusive long-term effects. Two studies recruited friends from an individual's authentic social group. While opportunities for improving mental health literacy and help-seeking emerged as key themes, the role of friends in mental health interventions has only been included in a small number of studies. Given that friends are a key point of contact for many adolescents, a better understanding of their domains of influence, particularly on mental health, will potentially enhance interventions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ludowyk N, Trail K, Morecroft R. A community-led suicide prevention initiative for young people in regional and rural Australia: the Live4Life model. AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/00050067.2022.2158063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katherine Trail
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shand F, Torok M. Schools are important for preventing suicide, but more needs to be done. Med J Aust 2022; 216:516-517. [DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Shand
- Black Dog Institute University of New South Wales Sydney NSW
| | - Michelle Torok
- Black Dog Institute University of New South Wales Sydney NSW
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Long JC, Ruane C, Ellis LA, Lake R, Le Roux A, Testa L, Shand F, Torok M, Zurynski Y. Networks to strengthen community social capital for suicide prevention in regional Australia: the LifeSpan suicide prevention initiative. Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:10. [PMID: 35130951 PMCID: PMC8822835 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00524-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Mental health services are fragmented in Australia leading to a priority being placed on whole-of-community approaches and integration. We describe the LifeSpan suicide prevention intervention developed by the Black Dog Institute that draws upon nine evidence-based community-wide strategies. We examined the suicide prevention Collaborative group at each site. We evaluated how the social capital of the community and service providers changed, and how the brokerage roles of the Collaborative affected integration of effort. Methods This was a two phase, explanatory mixed methods study. Participants were LifeSpan Coordinators, The Collaborative and working group members at four LifeSpan sites in New South Wales (three metropolitan/regional, one regional/rural). Quantitative social network data was collected through an online survey and analysed using Gephi software. Qualitative data through focus groups and interviews with Lifespan Coordinators and community stakeholders. Results The social network survey was administered in three sites and was completed by 83 people. Data gave quantitative evidence of increased engagement across key stakeholders in each region who had not previously been working together. Nominations of other collaborators showed this network extended beyond the formal structures of The Collaborative. LifeSpan Coordinators were empirically identified as key players in the networks. Qualitative data was collected from 53 individuals (18 interviews and five focus groups) from across all sites. Participants identified benefits of this collaborative approach including greater capacity to run activities, better communication between groups, identification of “who’s who” locally, improvement in the integration of priorities, services and activities, and personal support for previously isolated members. LifeSpan Coordinators were key to the smooth running of The Collaborative. This may represent a risk to sustainability if they left. The collaboration model that suited metropolitan sites was difficult to sustain in rural sites, but gains were seen in better coordinated postvention efforts. Conclusion LifeSpan Coordinators were noted to be exceptional people who magnified the benefits of collaboration. Geographic proximity was a potent driver of social capital. Initial engagement with local stakeholders was seen as essential but time-consuming work in the implementation phase. Coordinators reported this important work was not always acknowledged as part of their formal role. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-022-00524-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Colum Ruane
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Louise A Ellis
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.,NHMRC Partnership Centre in Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lake
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Anneke Le Roux
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Luke Testa
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Fiona Shand
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michelle Torok
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yvonne Zurynski
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|