The role of saline irrigation prior to wound closure in the reduction of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effect of Subcutaneous Saline Irrigation on Wound Complications After Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Subcutaneous (SC) saline irrigation was reported as a feasible and cost-effective procedure to prevent cesarean section (CS) surgical site complications. We aim to investigate the efficacy of SC saline irrigation to prevent CS surgical site complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 2024. Pooled outcomes included wound complications (superficial surgical site infections (SSI), hematoma, seroma, and wound separation) and operative time. We used RevMan v.5.4. (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Five RCTs with 4,025 patients were included. Four studies had a low overall risk of bias and only one trial with some concerns about selection bias. There was no difference between SC saline irrigation and no irrigation regarding the incidence of superficial SSI (five RCTs, RR: 0.72 with 95% CI [0.47, 1.10], P = 0.13), seroma (four RCTs, RR: 0.73 with 95% CI [0.32, 1.65], P = 0.45), wound separation (four RCTs, RR: 0.66 with 95% CI [0.36, 1.24], P = 0.2), and operative time (four RCTs, MD: -1.26 with 95% CI [-5.14, 2.62], P = 0.52). However, SC saline irrigation significantly decreased the incidence of hematoma (three RCTs, RR: 0.54 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.65], P = 0.00001). SC saline irrigation of the surgical site after CS was not effective in preventing the incidence of superficial SSI, seroma, or wound separation, while only preventing the incidence of hematoma.

The Use of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia Is Increasing and Has Low Complication Rates

Purpose

To analyze the annual use of hip arthroscopy (HA) and Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of hip dysplasia (HD), as well as postoperative outcomes, including ipsilateral reoperations.

Methods

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, codes were used to query the PearlDiver Mariner database from January 2010 through January 2022 to identify patients aged 10 to 59 years who had a presenting diagnosis of HD and subsequently underwent (1) HA; (2) PAO; or (3) combined HA and PAO (HA-PAO, defined as PAO on the same day or within 28 days after HA). We analyzed annual rates for each treatment, as well as rates of postoperative emergency visits, readmissions, and 5-year ipsilateral secondary operations (determined via Kaplan-Meier analysis).

Results

There were 32,068 patients who underwent surgical treatment of HD. For HA, PAO, and HA-PAO, there were 29,700, 2,083, and 285 patients, respectively. All operations had the greatest percent-increase from 2015 to 2016. HA and HA-PAO peaked in 2021, whereas PAO peaked in 2019. For HA, PAO, and HA-PAO, most cases were performed in female patients and patients aged 30 to 49 years, 10 to 19 years, and 10 to 29 years, respectively. The 5-year incidence of ipsilateral secondary operations, which include revision HA, PAO, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty, was 9.2% (95% confidence interval 8.6%-9.8%) in the HA group and 6.5% (95% confidence interval 4.1%-8.8%) in the PAO group. Combining HA with PAO resulted in so few secondary operations that Kaplan-Meier analysis was infeasible. The PAO cohort had the greatest 30-day emergency visit and 90-day readmission rates, with infection as the most common cause for readmission.

Conclusions

HA is more frequently performed than PAO for hip dysplasia. HA-PAO is increasing at the greatest rate, demonstrating fewer complications and reoperations.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Histopathological and histomorphometric investigation of the effects of different irrigation solutions on Achilles tendon healing in rats

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the effect of irrigation fluids containing povidone-iodine (PVP-I), rifampicin (RF), and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) used during surgery on healing on a rat Achilles tendon model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats (range, 300 to 400 g) were used in the experiment carried out between November 2022 and December 2022. The rats were divided into PVP-I, RF, CHG, and control groups, with seven rats in each group. Following the tenotomy and repair of the right Achilles tendon, the surgical site was irrigated using PVP-I, RF, CHG, or normal saline (the control group) for 2 min. All rats were sacrificed on the 21st postoperative day. The samples were evaluated histomorphometrically using the scoring system modified by Svensson, Soslowsky, and Cook and histopathologically using the Bonar and Movin classifications.

RESULTS

The RF group gave better results in all three scoring systems compared to the control, PVP-I, and CHG groups (p=0.008, p=0.002, and p=0.006, respectively). Cellularity, rounding, and tenocyte morphology showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group (p=0.004). While the distribution of ground substance glycosaminoglycans showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group, there was no significant difference among the other groups (p=0.22).

CONCLUSION

Irrigation solutions containing PVP-I, RF, or CHG show no negative effect on Achilles tendon healing. Moreover, the findings suggest that RF irrigation can accelerate the healing process.

Breakthrough treatments for accelerated wound healing

Skin injuries across the body continue to disrupt everyday life for millions of patients and result in prolonged hospital stays, infection, and death. Advances in wound healing devices have improved clinical practice but have mainly focused on treating macroscale healing versus underlying microscale pathophysiology. Consensus is lacking on optimal treatment strategies using a spectrum of wound healing products, which has motivated the design of new therapies. We summarize advances in the development of novel drug, biologic products, and biomaterial therapies for wound healing for marketed therapies and those in clinical trials. We also share perspectives for successful and accelerated translation of novel integrated therapies for wound healing.

Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update

The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

Surgical site infection prevention in abdominal surgery: is intraoperative wound irrigation with antiseptics effective? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infection (SSI) after laparotomy still represents the most frequent postoperative complicationin abdominal surgery. The effectiveness of reducing SSI rates by intra-operative irrigation of the incisional wound with antiseptic solutions or saline has been much debated, and recommendations on its use are divergent. Therefore, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, focusing specifically on procedures by laparotomy and considering recent evidence only.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. On 1 July 2022, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE were searched for the following predefined terms: (Surgical site infection) AND ((irrigation) OR (wound irrigation) OR (lavage)) AND ((abdominal surgery) OR (laparotomy). The search was limited to peer-revied publications, dating after 1 January 2000 in English or German language. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included for reference screening. Case reports, case series, non-systematic reviews and studies without follow-up information were excluded. The primary outcome is the rate of postoperative SSI after abdominal surgery by laparotomy. Meta-analysis is pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool, and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Completion of the analysis and publication is planned in March 2023.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not necessary for this study, as no new data will be collected. The results of the final study will be published in a peer-reviewed open-access journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022321458.

EFFECT OF IRRIGATION FLUID COMPOSITION ON HEMOSTASIS IN MOUSE BLEEDING MODELS

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Intraoperative irrigation, usually with normal saline (NS), aids in bleeding identification and management. We investigated the effect of different irrigation fluids, with additives, on hemostasis using two bleeding models. Methods: C57BL/6 J mice were subjected to a tail bleed model or uncontrolled abdominal hemorrhage via liver laceration followed by abdominal cavity irrigation. We compared NS, lactated Ringer's (LR), and PlasmaLyte. We examined NS and LR at different temperatures. Normal saline or LR with calcium (Ca 2+ ) or tranexamic acid (TXA) was studied. Results: Compared with room temperature (RT), increasing the temperature of the irrigation fluid to 37°C and 42°C reduced tail vein bleeding times substantially in both NS and LR (all P < 0.001), with no significant differences between the two fluids. At RT, LR, but not PlasmaLyte, substantially reduced bleeding times in comparison to NS ( P < 0.0001). Liver injury blood loss was lower with LR ( P < 0.01). Normal saline supplemented with 2.7 mEq/L of Ca 2+ decreased bleeding time and blood loss volume ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) to similar levels as LR. Normal saline with 150 mg/mL of TXA markedly reduced bleeding time ( P < 0.0001), and NS with 62.5 mg/mL TXA decreased blood loss ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whereas Ca 2+ - and TXA-supplemented NS reduced bleeding, LR remained superior to all irrigation fluid compositions. As LR contains Ca 2+ , and Ca 2+ -supplemented NS mirrored LR in response, Ca 2+ presence in the irrigation fluid seems key to improving solution's hemostatic ability. Because warming the fluids normalized the choice of agents, the data also suggest that Ca 2+ -containing fluids such as LR may be more suitable for hemostasis when used at RT.

Wound Irrigation Using Wet Gauze May Reduce Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of wet gauze and conventional irrigation after laparoscopic appendectomy to determine whether wet gauze irrigation can help reduce surgical site infection (SSI).

Methods

A total of 308 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were included in this study between December 2018 and May 2020. Of these, 132 (42.9%) received gauze irrigation (group 1), and 176 patients (57.1%) received conventional irrigation (group 2). Pre-operative outcomes and complications, including SSI, were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for baseline differences and selection bias.

Results

After 1:1 PSM, 92 well-matched patients in each group were evaluated. Regarding perioperative outcomes between groups 1 and 2, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grades III, IV, and V), operative time, and readmission rate did not differ between the groups. Superficial/deep SSIs were observed more frequently in group 2 (8/92 cases) than in group 1 (1/92 cases; p = 0.017). The organ/space SSIs rate was not significantly different between the two groups (1/92 group 1 and 0/92 group 2, p = 0.316). However, post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in group 2 (2.8 ± 1.3 days) than in group 1 (1.6 ± 1.2 days; p < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, wound irrigation using wet gauze was an independent protective factor for superficial or deep SSI (p = 0.044).

Conclusions

Wound irrigation using wet gauze after fascia closure has a significant beneficial effect on reducing post-operative superficial/deep SSI following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Wound irrigation for preventing surgical site infections

Wound irrigation (i.e. washing out a wound before wound closure) aims to reduce the microbial burden by removing tissue debris, metabolic waste, and tissue exudate from the surgical field before site closure. Although it is a popular procedure in every day surgical practice, the lack of procedure standardization, leads to studies with high heterogeneity and often controversial results. Thus, there are studies that advocate its use, while others discourage its implementation in clinical practice to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. The present article reviews the current literature on wound irrigation for preventing surgical site infections. Several irrigants are presented. Chlorexidine is generally considered to be less effective than povidone-iodine, while antibiotics are not that common nowadays, as they require prolonged exposure with the target to act. Hydrogen peroxide has several potential complications, which eliminate its use. Any differences in the incidence of surgical site infections between different irrigants, especially between antibacterial and non-bacterial ones, should be viewed sceptically. More randomized controlled studies are needed to provide better quality of evidence regarding the irrigants' effectiveness and safety.