Minimal residual disease- and graft-vs.-host disease-guided multiple consolidation chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion prevent second acute leukemia relapse after allotransplant

Haploidentical transplants with a G-CSF/ATG-based protocol: Experience from China

Haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) has made great advances in recent decades. The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)- and antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based protocol, which is known as the Beijing Protocol, represents one of the current T-cell repletion strategies in haplo-SCT. The key elements of the Beijing Protocol for graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis include G-CSF inducing T-cell tolerance and altering graft cell components, as well as ATG administration exerting an immunoregulatory effect for intensive prophylaxis. This review will summarize the GvHD incidence, the underlying novel mechanism for GvHD prophylaxis, how to optimize GvHD prophylaxis, and the recent advances of the Beijing Protocol, mainly focusing on the issues of GvHD.

Comparison of outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation in first and second complete remission

There was no consensus on whether prognostic advantages existed when transplant conducted at first complete remission (CR1) stage than at second complete remission (CR2) stage for patients with AML who received haploidentical hematological stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). In 768 consecutive AML patients who received haplo-HSCT from January 2014 to December 2017, a 1:2 ratio matched-pair analysis was performed, 69 patients who in CR2 group and 138 CR1 patients were enrolled. Hematopoietic recovery, graft versus host disease (GVHD), relapse, transplant related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in two groups, and further evaluated in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups. The cumulative incidences of 30-day myeloid recovery and 90-day platelet recovery were comparable in CR1 and CR2 groups. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD were not significantly different. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 3-year and 5-year in these two groups were 12.4% versus 11.6% (P = 0.880) and 12.4% versus 17.5% (P = 0.322). The cumulative incidences of TRM at 3-year and 5-year were both 10.9% versus 23.2% (P = 0.019). The probability of DFS at 3-year and 5-year were 76.7% versus 65.2% (P = 0.029) and 76.7% versus 59.3% (P = 0.009). The probability of OS at 3-year and 5-year were 81.8% versus 68.1% (P = 0.026) and 76.7% versus 59.3% (P = 0.026). In the intermediate-risk group, TRM was lower in CR1 group, DFS and OS of CR1 group were superior to CR2 group. In conclusion, haplo-HSCT at CR1 stage was of better prognosis for intermediate-risk AML patients than at CR2 stage.

A Prognostic Model Based on Clinical Biomarkers for Heart Failure in Adult Patients Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Heart failure (HF) is an uncommon but serious cardiovascular complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Unfortunately, knowledge about early mortality prognostic factors in patients with HF after allo-HSCT is limited, and an easy-to-use prognostic model is not available. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical-biomarker prognostic model capable of predicting HF mortality following allo-HSCT that uses a combination of variables readily available in clinical practice. To investigate this issue, we conducted a retrospective analysis at our center with 154 HF patients who underwent allo-HSCT between 2008 and 2021. The patients were separated according to the time of transplantation, with 100 patients composing the derivation cohort and the other 54 patients composing the external validation cohort. We first calculated the univariable association for each variable with 2-month mortality in the derivation cohort. We then included the variables with a P value <.1 in univariate analysis as candidate predictors in the multivariate analysis using a backward stepwise logistic regression model. Variables remaining in the final model were identified as independent prognostic factors. To predict the prognosis of HF, a scoring system was established, and scores were assigned to the prognostic factors based on the regression coefficient. Finally, 4 strongly significant independent prognostic factors for 2-month mortality from HF were identified using multivariable logistic regression methods with stepwise variable selection: pulmonary infection (P = .005), grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (severe aGVHD; P = .033), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >426 U/L (P = .049), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) >1799 pg/mL (P = .026). A risk grading model termed the BLIPS score (for BNP, LDH, cardiac troponin I, pulmonary infection, and severe aGVHD) was constructed according to the regression coefficients. The validated internal C-statistic was .870 (95% confidence interval [CI], .798 to .942), and the external C-statistic was .882 (95% CI, .791-.973). According to the calibration plots, the model-predicted probability correlated well with the actual observed frequencies. The clinical use of the prognostic model, according to decision curve analysis, could benefit HF patients. The BLIPS model in our study can serve to identify HF patients at higher risk for mortality early, which might aid designing timely targeted therapies and eventually improving patients' survival and prognosis.

Homoharringtonine-Based Induction Therapy Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Pediatric patients with AML who relapse after HSCT have an extremely poor prognosis. We performed a retrospective study of pediatric patients diagnosed with AML from August 2015 to October 2019 who were treated with HSCT. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between the baseline characteristics and relapse. A total of 37 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients survived, and 9 (24.3%) patients died. The OS rates of AML patients treated with HSCT were 89.2% ± 5.1%, 75.7% ± 7.1%, and 75.7% ± 7.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, and the CRRs were 11.4% ± 5.4%, 24.7% ± 7.7%, and 33.1% ± 10.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years after HSCT, respectively; four of nine children who relapsed after transplantation died. Induction with etoposide rather than homoharringtonine and fungal infections could be high-risk factors for recurrence after transplantation. The association between homoharringtonine-based induction therapy and a low recurrence rate persisted after adjusting for age, sex, risk stratification, fusion genes, and fungal infections. This study clarifies the clinical features and poor prognosis of post-transplant relapse in pediatric AML and indicates the urgent need for effective therapy for patients who relapse after HSCT.

Decitabine-Intensified Modified Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen Improves Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

To identify the benefit of decitabine (Dec)-intensified myeloablative conditioning on the outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we performed a retrospective matched-pair study from a pool of 156 patients to evaluate Dec [20 mg/m²/day intravenously (i.v.) on days -11 to -7]-intensified modified busulfan/cyclophosphamide (mBuCy) conditioning regimen vs. mBuCy regimen in 92 AML patients, with 46 patients in each cohort. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was lower in the Dec group (15.2% ± 0.3% vs. 32.6% ± 0.5%, P = 0.033). Compared with mBuCy group (15.5% ± 0.3%), a significantly higher proportion of limited chronic GVHD (cGVHD) in Dec group (35% ± 0.6%) was observed (P = 0.025). Dec-intensified mBuCy conditioning was associated with better 2-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (81% ± 6.2% vs. 59.4% ± 7.5%, P = 0.03; 58.7% ± 8.1% vs. 40.9% ± 7.3%, P = 0.042; respectively). Our results also elucidated that the Dec group had better 2-year OS and lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in patients acquiring haploidentical HSCT than that of the mBuCy group (84.8% ± 7.1% vs. 58.2% ± 10.3%, P = 0.047; 17.9% ± 0.8% vs. 40.0% ± 1.0%, P = 0.036; respectively), which did not increase the treatment-related mortality and regimen-associated toxicities. Dec-intensified myeloablative regimen and high-risk stratification were the variables associated with OS, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and GRFS in multivariate analysis. In high-risk patients, no differences were found in CIR, OS, LFS, and GRFS between the two groups. These data indicated that Dec-intensified mBuCy conditioning regimen was associated with better survival than mBuCy regimen in AML patients, especially in patients undergoing haploidentical HSCT.

Optimization of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for AML Relapse After Allo-HCT in the Era of New Drugs and Cell Engineering

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a key strategy for the treatment of AML relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and has been used for either prophylactic, pre-emptive, or therapeutic purposes. However, the prognosis of these patients remains dismal even after DLI infusion (2-year overall survival, ~25%), and the efficacy is achieved at the cost of toxicities such as graft-versus-host (GVH) disease. Attempts to optimize DLI efficacy and safety, such as dose/timing modification and the use of cytoreduction, before DLI have been performed previously. Recently, a great number of novel targeted and immunomodulatory agents have emerged. Some of them, such as hypomethylating agents, FLT3 and Bcl-2 inhibitors, have been used in combination with DLI, aiming to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Moreover, manipulation of the DLI graft through cell selection (e.g., donor NK cells) or cell engineering (donor CAR-T cells) has shown potentially superior anti-tumor effects but less GVH effect than conventional DLI in clinical trials. This review summarizes the recent advances on the use of DLI for the prophylaxis/treatment of AML relapse and discusses future strategies which may further improve the treatment efficacy.

Second unmanipulated allogeneic transplantation could be used as a salvage option for patients with relapsed acute leukemia post-chemotherapy plus modified donor lymphocyte infusion

Relapse is the main problem after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The outcome of a second allo-HSCT (HSCT2) for relapse post-HSCT has shown promising results in some previous studies. However, little is known about the efficacy of HSCT2 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia (AL) post-chemotherapy plus modified donor lymphocyte infusion (post-Chemo + m-DLI) after the first allo-HSCT (HSCT1). Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of HSCT2 in 28 patients with relapsed/refractory AL post-Chemo + m-DLI in our center. With a median follow-up of 918 (457-1732) days, 26 patients (92.9%) achieved complete remission, and 2 patients exhibited persistent disease. The probabilities of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) 1 year after HSCT2 were 25.0% and 21.4%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality on day 100 and at 1 year post-HSCT2 were 7.1% ± 4.9% and 25.0% ± 8.4%. The cumulative incidences of relapse were 50.0% ± 9.8% and 53.5% ± 9.9% at 1 and 2 years post-HSCT2, respectively. Risk stratification prior to HSCT1 and percentage of blasts before HSCT2 were independent risk factors for OS post-HSCT2, and relapse within 6 months post-HSCT1 was an independent risk factor for DFS and relapse post-HSCT2. Our findings suggest that HSCT2 could be a salvage option for patients with relapsed AL post-Chemo + m-DLI.

A risk score system for stratifying the risk of relapse in B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients after allogenic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

For patients with B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), many variables have been demonstrated to be associated with leukemia relapse. In this study, we attempted to establish a risk score system to predict transplant outcomes more precisely in patients with B-ALL after allo-SCT.

METHODS

A total of 477 patients with B-ALL who underwent allo-SCT at Peking University People's Hospital from December 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with transplant outcomes after allo-SCT, and establish a risk score to identify patients with different probabilities of relapse. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and 95.4% of patients achieved platelet engraftment. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and non-relapse mortality were 20.7%, 70.4%, 65.6%, and 13.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with positive post-transplantation minimal residual disease (MRD), transplanted beyond the first complete remission (≥CR2), and without chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) had higher CIR (P  < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P  < 0.001, respectively) and worse LFS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.017, and P  < 0.001, respectively), and OS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.009, and P  < 0.001, respectively) than patients without MRD after transplantation, transplanted in CR1, and with cGVHD. A risk score for predicting relapse was formulated with the three above variables. The 5-year relapse rates were 6.3%, 16.6%, 55.9%, and 81.8% for patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 (P  < 0.001), respectively, while the 5-year LFS and OS values decreased with increasing risk score.

CONCLUSION

This new risk score system might stratify patients with different risks of relapse, which could guide treatment.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myeloid sarcoma: a single center retrospective study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been regarded as a potential strategy for myeloid sarcoma (MS). The previous reports focused mainly on matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation. There are no reports on haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) in MS. We retrospectively reviewed 14 MS patients who underwent haplo-HSCT. All patients achieved complete donor engraftment. The median time for neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 10 (12-21) days and 18 (8-31) days. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD were 37.7% (95%CI, 23.2-52.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.2-49.2%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation was documented in 86% patients, and only one patient developed CMV pneumonia. Treatment-related mortality occurred in one (7%) patient. The 1- and 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 21.4% (95%CI, 11.8-31.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.4-49.0%). The probability of overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 64.3% (95%CI, 43.5-95.0%), respectively. The probability of disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 57.1% (95%CI, 36.3-89.9%), respectively. In conclusion, haplo-HSCT is a feasible method for patients with MS who have no MSD or MUD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in the first remission: outcomes using haploidentical donors are similar to those using matched siblings

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective and curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We explored the outcome of haploidentical donor (HID) transplantation for intermediate-risk AML and compared to that of matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants. One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients with intermediate-risk AML in the first complete remission (CR1) who underwent allo-HSCT between January 1, 2015, and August 1, 2016, were enrolled. Thirty-seven patients received MSD grafts, and 90 received HID grafts. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) of the HID group was comparable to that of the MSD group: 82.0% ± 4.1% versus 82.7% ± 6.4%, P = 0.457. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) were comparable between the HID and MSD groups (relapse, 4.5% ± 0.1%, versus 11.5% ± 0.3%, P = 0.550; TRM, 13.4% ± 0.1% vs. 5.8% ± 0.2%, P = 0.154). The HID recipients had a trend of a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of positive posttransplant flow cytometry (FCM+) and relapse than the MSD recipients (5.6% ± 0.1% vs. 19.9% ± 0.5%, P = 0.092). These results suggest that the outcomes of allo-HSCT with HIDs are comparable to those with MSDs in terms of LFS, TRM, and relapse for intermediate-risk AML in CR1. HIDs could be an alternative to MSDs for intermediate-risk AML.

Prognosis and risk factors for central nervous system relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

We performed a nested case-control study to investigate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and compared the outcomes of patients with CNS relapse following haploidentical donor (HID) HSCT versus identical sibling donor (ISD) HSCT. A total of 37 patients (HID-HSCT, 24; ISD-HSCT, 13) developed CNS relapse after transplantation between January 2009 and January 2019, with an incidence of 1.81%. The median time from transplantation to CNS relapse was 239 days. Pre-HSCT CNS involvement (HR 6.940, 95% CI 3.146-15.306, p < .001) was an independent risk factor for CNS relapse after allo-HSCT for AML. The 3-year overall survival (OS) for patients with CNS relapse was 60.3 ± 8.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the controls (81.5 ± 4.5%, p = .003). The incidence of CNS relapse was 1.64% for patients who received HID-HSCT and 2.55% for those who received ISD-HSCT (p = .193). There was no significant difference in OS between the HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT subgroups among the patients with CNS relapse. In conclusion, CNS relapse is a rare but serious complication after allo-HSCT for AML, and the incidence and outcomes of patients with CNS relapse are comparable following HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT.

The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute graft-vs-host disease in pediatric T-cell-replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The specific description, risk factors, and outcomes of aGVHD in pediatric haplo-HSCT using TCR protocols without PT-Cy have not been well described previously. We evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of aGVHD in 350 consecutive pediatric patients receiving TCR haplo-HSCT without PT-Cy according to the Glucksberg and NIH aGVHD classifications between January 2015 and December 2017 at Peking University Institute of Hematology. The cumulative incidences of grade I, II, III, and IV aGVHD were 28%, 29.7%, 8.3%, and 5.1%, respectively. The type of aGVHD onset was classic in 243 patients (97.2%), and persistent/recurrent/late-onset aGVHD was in seven patients (2.8%). None of the considered variables significantly influenced the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD. The 3-year OS, DFS, cumulative incidence of NRM, and relapse in malignant disease between severe aGVHD (III-IV) group and grade 0-II aGVHD group were 61.5% vs 77.2% (P = .027), 58.6% vs 75.1% (P = .014), 19.8% vs 5.3% (P = .002), and 21.6% vs 19.6% (P = .59), respectively; in non-malignant diseases, the 3-year OS, DFS, and NRM were 81.8% vs 97.4% (P = .05), 81.8% vs 97.4% (P = .05), and 18.2% vs 2.6% (P = .05), respectively. Under the protocol of pediatric TCR haplo-HSCT without PT-Cy, the persistent/recurrent/late-onset aGVHD was rare, and the incidence of severe aGVHD was acceptable and significantly contributed to NRM and lower survival in both malignant disease and non-malignant diseases.

Effect of Salvage Chemotherapy Before Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients With Relapse After Allogeneic Hematologic Stem Cell Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an important treatment option in hematologic malignancies. Relapse after AHSCT is an indicator of poor prognosis. These patients may be treated with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The chemotherapy given before DLI increases the success of the treatment by reducing the burden of disease. The aim of this study is to investigate post-DLI graft vs host disease (GvHD) and survival based on the course of chemotherapy given before DLI.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients who received DLI because of relapsed disease after AHSCT were enrolled. All of the patients received 1 or more courses of cytoreductive chemotherapy before DLI.

RESULTS

Complete remission (CR) after DLI remained in 78.2% of all patients. There is no difference between 1 or multiple courses of chemotherapy in terms of CR (55.6% vs 44.4%; P = .21). During follow-up after DLI, although it did not reach statistical significance (P = .09), the patients receiving single-course chemotherapy tended to have longer survival (36.1 vs 4.3 months, respectively). Four patients who received multiple courses of chemotherapy were lost because of infection-related disease (pneumonia, sepsis) while they were in CR. GvHD development was more frequent in patients receiving multiple courses of chemotherapies (60% of all GvHD patients).

CONCLUSION

It has been demonstrated that reducing the tumor burden by multiple-cycle chemotherapy does not have any advantage in terms of CR and does not improve the overall survival.

Different Effects of Pre-transplantation Measurable Residual Disease on Outcomes According to Transplant Modality in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive ALL

Background: This study compared the effects of pre-transplantation measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) on outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL patients who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) or who received unmanipulated haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT). Methods: A retrospective study (n = 202) was performed. MRD was detected by RT-PCR and multiparameter flow cytometry. Results: In the total patient group, patients with positive pre-MRD had a higher 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than that in patients with negative pre-MRD (26.1% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.009); however, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7.4% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.148), probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (66.3% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.480), and overall survival (OS) (68.8% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.322) were comparable. In the MSDT group, patients with positive pre-MRD had increased 4-year CIR (56.4% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.001) and decreased 4-year LFS (35.9% vs. 71.0%, P = 0.024) and OS (35.9% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.011) compared with those with negative pre-MRD. In haplo-SCT settings, the 4-year CIR (14.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.297), NRM (7.3% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.187) and the 4-year probability of OS (77.7% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.804) and LFS (80.5% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.660) were comparable between pre-MRD positive and negative groups. In subgroup patients with positive pre-MRD, haplo-SCT had a lower 4-year CIR (14.8% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.021) and a higher 4-year LFS (77.7% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.036) and OS (80.5% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.027) than those of MSDT. Multivariate analysis showed that haplo-SCT was associated with lower CIR (HR, 0.288; P = 0.031), superior LFS (HR, 0.283; P = 0.019) and OS (HR, 0.252; P = 0.013) in cases with a positive pre-MRD subgroup. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the effects of positive pre-MRD on the outcomes of patients with Ph-positive ALL are different according to transplant modality. For Ph-positive cases with positive pre-MRD, haplo-SCT might have strong graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effects.

Clinical applications of donor lymphocyte infusion from an HLA-haploidentical donor: consensus recommendations from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Donor lymphocyte infusion has been used in the management of relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. It can eradicate minimal residual disease or be used to rescue a hematologic relapse, being able to induce durable remissions in a subset of patients. With the increased use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, there is renewed interest in the use of donor lymphocytes to either treat or prevent disease relapse post transplant. Published retrospective and small prospective studies have shown encouraging results with therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusion in different haploidentical transplantation platforms. In this consensus paper, finalized on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize the available evidence on the use of donor lymphocyte infusion from haploidentical donor, and provide recommendations on its therapeutic, pre-emptive and prophylactic use in clinical practice.

Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and anti-thymocyte globulin as an effective strategy for GVHD prevention in haploidentical patients

BACKGROUND

Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in conjunction with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) appears as a potentially effective graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention strategy in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (haplo-HCT). Our study aims to assess the efficacy of this regimen.

METHODS

We extended our prospective study in patients treated with low-dose PTCy (14.5 mg/kg on days 3 and 4) in ATG/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based regimen and compared the results to the contemporary cohort of patients without low-dose PTCy (ATG cohort). Both study cohort and control are transplanted from maternal donor or collateral relatives.

RESULTS

We identified 239 consecutive patients (ATG-PTCy cohort = 114; ATG cohort = 125). All patients but one in ATG cohort achieved myeloid engraftment by day 30 post-HCT. We found that both the cumulative incidence of 100-day grade III-IV aGvHD and non-relapse-mortality (NRM) in the ATG-PTCy cohort was significantly reduced than that in the ATG group (5% vs 18%; P = 0.003; and 6% vs 15%; P= 0.045); the 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse and overall survival were comparable between the two cohorts (13% vs 14%; P = 0.62; and 83% vs 77%; P = 0.18, respectively). Furthermore, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was significantly improved in the ATG-PTCy arm (63% vs 48%; P = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, the joint treatment resulted in lower grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR 0.58; P = 0.036), grade III-IV aGvHD (HR 0.28; P = 0.006), chronic GVHD (HR 0.60; P = 0.047), NRM (HR 0.26; P = 0.014), and higher GRFS (HR 0.59; P = 0.021) but slower myeloid and platelet recovery (HR 0.29 and 0.30; both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that ATG/PTCy (low-dose) can reduce both acute and chronic GVHD as compared with standard ATG-based prophylaxis using maternal donor or collateral relatives at particular high GVHD risk.

Prophylaxis and treatment of relapse after haploidentical stem cell transplantation: What is known vs unknown?

In recent years, the human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) approach is an attractive option for patients who require transplantation, but relapse is still the main reason that affects the curative effect of transplantation. Some studies have shown that haplo-SCT is superior to sibling or unrelated matching donor transplantation in preventing leukemia relapse after transplantation. In this review, we discussed the known and unknown aspects of relapse post haplo-SCT. Encouragingly, haplo-SCT experienced lower or similar incidence of relapse. But there is currently a lack of multicenter prospective studies evaluating the outcomes of different haplo-SCT strategies. The combination of common prophylactic strategies and pre-emptive interventions might help prevent relapse after transplantation. Novel methods such as target drugs therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy may be useful in treatment of relapse.

Sorafenib Therapy Is Associated with Improved Outcomes for FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapsing after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The optimal therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. In this study we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of sorafenib combined with other therapeutic strategies as salvage therapy for these patients. Eighty-three AML patients with FLT3-ITD relapsing after allo-HSCT were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients received salvage therapy containing sorafenib and 30 patients did not. Salvage therapy containing sorafenib was superior to that without sorafenib with respect to complete remission rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) (66.0% versus 30.0%, 46.8% versus 20.0%, and 44.9% versus 16.7%, respectively; P = .002, P = .003, and P = .001). Further subgroup analysis revealed that the OS and PFS of patients who received sorafenib combined with chemotherapy followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were superior to those receiving other therapeutic regimens, including sorafenib combined with chemotherapy, chemotherapy followed by DLI, and monochemotherapy (P = .003, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that salvage therapy including sorafenib was the only protective factor for longer OS (P = .035; hazard ratio [HR], .526); salvage therapy including sorafenib and DLI were the protective factors for longer PFS (P = .011, HR, .423; P = .019, HR, .508). Our data suggest that sorafenib therapy is associated with improved outcomes for FLT3-ITD AML relapsing after allo-HSCT, and whether sorafenib combined with chemotherapy followed by DLI reveals an optimal efficacy merits further study.

[The comparison of predicting clinical outcomes between immunolophenotype and hematological complete remission before human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia]

目的

比较移植前免疫表型缓解（ICR）和血液形态学缓解对急性髓系白血病（AML）患者同胞HLA相合造血干细胞移植（MSDT）疗效的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析182例接受MSDT的AML患者（除外急性早幼粒细胞白血病），将移植前血液形态学缓解分为血细胞恢复的完全缓解（CR）、血小板未恢复的CR（CRp）、血小板和中性粒细胞均未恢复的CR（CRi），将多参数流式细胞术检测微小残留病阴性定义为ICR。

结果

①全部182例AML患者中，男97例，女85例，中位年龄41（4~62）岁。②移植前CR、CRp+CRi率分别为80.8%（147/182）、19.2%（35/182）；移植前CRp+CRi组、CR组的预期4年累积复发率（CIR）[（11.0±4.3）%对（16.0±7.1）%，χ²=0.274，P=0.600]、非复发死亡率（NRM）[（14.0±4.3）%对（9.0±6.3）%，χ²=0.913，P=0.339]、无白血病生存（LFS）率[（75.0±5.1）%对（75.0±8.3）%，χ²=0.256，P=0.613]、总生存（OS）率[（77.0±5.2）%对（80.0±8.1）%，χ²=0.140，P=0.708]差异均无统计学意义。③移植前ICR组（147例）与非ICR组（35例）比较，4年CIR较低[（11.3±3.4）%对（55.2±8.8）%，χ²=32.687，P<0.001]，LFS率[（76.2±4.7）%对（32.8±8.7）%，χ²=26.234，P<0.001]和OS率[（79.0±4.7）%对（39.0±9.1）%，χ²=25.253，P<0.001]较高，NRM差异无统计学意义[（12.5±4.1）%对（12.0±7.1）%，χ²=1.002，P=0.656]。④多因素分析显示，移植前非ICR是影响AML患者MSDT后复发[HR=11.026（95% CI 4.685~25.949），P<0.001]、LFS[HR=5.785（95% CI 2.974~11.254），P< 0.001]和OS[HR=5.578（95%CI 2.575~27.565），P<0.001]的独立危险因素。

结论

移植前ICR对AML患者MSDT的疗效预测价值优于HCR。

Chemotherapy plus DLI for relapse after haploidentical HSCT: the biological characteristics of relapse influences clinical outcomes of acute leukemia patients

This study investigated the prognostic factors in patients (n = 89) who experienced relapse and received chemotherapy plus donor leukocyte infusion (Chemo-DLI) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Patients with early relapse (< 6 vs. > 6 months after haplo-HSCT), higher bone marrow blast count before chemo-DLI (> 20% vs. 5-19%), and without chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after chemo-DLI had a higher rate of progressive disease (PD) and worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis, non-cGVHD after Chemo-DLI and high blast count predicted a higher risk of PD and poorer PFS, and non-cGVHD after Chemo-DLI and early relapse predicted poorer OS. The patients were stratified into three groups according to these three risk factors. Patients with all three risk factors (n = 14) had the highest PD rate and poorest survival compared with those with one or two risk factors (n = 63) or no risk factors (n = 12). Thus, early relapse, high leukemia burden before Chemo-DLI, and non-cGVHD after Chemo-DLI can predict outcomes in patients who have experienced relapse and received Chemo-DLI after haplo-HSCT. New therapeutic strategies should be identified for these patients.

Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplantation Is Superior to Chemotherapy for Patients with Intermediate-risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in First Complete Remission

PURPOSE

Although myeloablative HLA haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) following pretransplant anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulated grafts (ATG+G-CSF) has been confirmed as an alternative to HSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD), the effect of haplo-HSCT on postremission treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intermediate risk (int-risk AML) who achieved first complete remission (CR1) has not been defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective trial, among 443 consecutive patients ages 16-60 years with newly diagnosed de novo AML with int-risk cytogenetics, 147 patients with molecular int-risk AML who achieved CR1 within two courses of induction and remained in CR1 at 4 months postremission either received chemotherapy (n = 69) or underwent haplo-HSCT (n = 78).

RESULTS

The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the haplo-HSCT group than in the chemotherapy group (74.3% vs. 47.3%; P = 0.0004 and 80.8% vs. 53.5%; P = 0.0001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis with propensity score adjustment, postremission treatment (haplo-HSCT vs. chemotherapy) was an independent risk factor affecting the LFS [HR 0.360; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.163-0.793; P = 0.011], OS (HR 0.361; 95% CI, 0.156-0.832; P = 0.017), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR 0.161; 95% CI, 0.057-0.459; P = 0.001) either in entire cohort or stratified by minimal residual disease after the second consolidation.

CONCLUSIONS

Myeloablative haplo-HSCT with ATG+G-CSF is superior to chemotherapy as a postremission treatment in patients with int-risk AML during CR1. Haplo-HSCT might be a first-line postremission therapy for int-risk AML in the absence of HLA-MSDs. Haplo-HSCT might be superior to chemotherapy as a first-line postremission treatment of intermediate-risk AML in CR1.

The consensus on the monitoring, treatment, and prevention of leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an important curative therapy for patients with leukemia. However, relapse remains the leading cause of death after transplantation. In recent years, substantial progress has been made by Chinese physicians in the field of establishment of novel transplant modality, patient selection, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, and immunological therapies, such as modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells, as well as MRD-directed intervention for relapse. Most of these unique systems are distinct from those in the Western world. In this consensus, we reviewed the efficacy of post-HSCT relapse management practice from available Chinese studies on behalf of the HSCT workgroup of the Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association, and compared these studies withthe consensus or guidelines outside China. We summarized the consensus on routine practices of post-HSCT relapse management in China and focused on the recommendations of MRD monitoring, risk stratification directed strategies, and modified DLI system. This consensus will likely contribute to the standardization of post-HSCT relapse management in China and become an inspiration for further international cooperation to refine global practices.

The significance of peri-transplantation minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry on outcomes for adult AML patients receiving haploidentical allografts

A retrospective study (n = 460) was performed to assess the relationship between minimal residual disease (MRD) and transplant outcomes in a haplo-stem cell transplantation (SCT) setting. Patients from the pre-MRDneg group and the pre-MRDpos group had comparable outcomes. Compared to post-MRDneg patients, post-MRDpos patients had a higher incidence of relapse (100.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), lower incidences of overall survival (OS) (16.9% vs. 78.2%, p < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (0% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001), and comparable probability of NRM (13.4% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.560). In a second set of analyses, all adult AML patients undergoing haplo-SCT were classified into the MRD^neg/MRD^neg group, the MRD decreasing group, and the MRD increasing group according to MRD dynamics by flow cytometry peri-SCT. Compared to the other two groups, patients from the MRD increasing group had higher cumulative incidences of relapse (MRD increasing, 100.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 9.6%; MRD decreasing, 19.2%; p < 0.001) and worse probabilities of OS (MRD increasing, 28.5%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 76.3%; MRD decreasing, 76.0%; p < 0.001) and LFS (MRD increasing, 0.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 73.9%; MRD decreasing, 74.0%; p < 0.001). The results indicated that haploidentical allografts might have a beneficial anti-leukemia effect in eradicating pretransplantation MRD, and MRD assessment peri-SCT is useful for risk stratification from a practical perspective.

Reversal of T Cell Exhaustion by the First Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Is Associated with the Persistently Effective Antileukemic Responses in Patients with Relapsed AML after Allo-HSCT

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an effective approach to treat acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) that significantly improves the survival of relapsed patients. However, the mechanism of an effective antileukemic response following DLI in AML relapse remains elusive. Here, we investigated the role of T cell exhaustion in AML relapse after allo-HSCT in prospective cohorts of 41 patients with the first AML relapse and 41 nonrelapsed AML control subjects after allo-HSCT and determined whether DLI exerts effective antileukemic effects by reversing T cell exhaustion in the relapsed cohorts by detecting the phenotypes and functions of T cells using flow cytometry. We found that both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells experienced exhaustion with upregulated coexpression of PD-1 and Tim-3, and functional impairments in cytokine production, proliferation, and cytotoxic potentials. The reversal of T cell exhaustion by the first DLI is associated with persistent complete remission in relapsed AML patients. In addition, the reversal of T cell-exhausted status after successful DLI in bone marrow was concurrent with the mitigated inversion of CD4/CD8 T cell ratio. In conclusion, our study shows a clinical correlation between T cell exhaustion and AML relapse after allo-HSCT, and uncovers the role of reversing T cell exhaustion in the antileukemic response by DLI and identifies possible immunological markers to evaluate and predict the graft-versus-leukemia effects induced by DLI.

T cell exhaustion characterized by compromised MHC class I and II restricted cytotoxic activity associates with acute B lymphoblastic leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) relapse contributes predominantly to the mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the mechanism of B-ALL relapse after allo-HSCT remains unknown. The eradication of leukemia after allo-HSCT largely relies on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects mediated by donor T cells. T cell exhaustion, characterized by the increased expression of inhibitory receptors and impaired function, may suppress GVL effects. In this study, we evaluated whether T cell exhaustion was involved in B-ALL relapse after allo-HSCT. The results showed that CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells exhibited increased coexpression of PD-1 and Tim-3, and compromised proliferative capacity, cytokine production and cytotoxic potentials in relapsed patients. Additionally, T cells at the tumor site were more easily exhausted than T cells in the peripheral blood. Moreover, the reversal of T cell exhaustion might correlate with effective anti-leukemic responses after reinduction. These results suggested that T cell exhaustion was associated with B-ALL relapse after allo-HSCT as well as its treatment outcome.

Update on current research into haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) is currently a suitable alternative worldwide for patients with hematological diseases, who lack human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings or unrelated donors. Areas covered: This review summarizes the advancements in Haplo-SCT in recent years, primarily focusing on the global trends of haploidentical allograft, the comparison of outcomes between Haplo-SCT and other transplantation modalities, strategies for improving clinical outcomes, including donor selection, hematopoietic reconstitution promotion, and graft-versus-host disease, and relapse prevention/management, as well as the expanded indications of Haplo-SCT, such as severe aplastic anemia, myeloma and lymphoma. Expert commentary: Haploidentical allografts, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-based protocol and a post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based protocol, have been the mainstream strategy for Haplo-SCT. However, there are many unanswered questions in this field.

Salvaged allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric chemotherapy refractory acute leukemia

There is an ongoing debate concerning the performance of salvaged allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute refractory leukemia, in whom the prognosis is quite dismal. Few studies have ever been conducted on this subject. This may be partly due to missed opportunities by majority of the patients in such situations. To investigate the feasibility, evaluate the efficiency, and identify the prognostic factors of allo-HSCT in this sub-setting, the authors performed a single institution-based retrospective analysis. A total of 44 patients, of whom 28 had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 13 had acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 3 had mixed phenotype leukemia (MPL), were enrolled in this study. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 34.3% (95% CI, 17.9–51.4%) and 33.6% (95% CI, 18.0–50.1%), respectively. The estimated 2-year incidence rates of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 43.8% (95% CI 26.4–60.0%) and 19.6% (95% CI 9.1–32.9%), respectively. The estimated 100-day cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) was 43.6% (95% CI 28.7–57.5%), and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 45.5% (95% CI 30.5–59.3%). Compared with the previous studies, the multivariate analysis in this study additionally identified that female donors and cGvHD were associated with lower relapse and better PFS and OS. Male recipients, age younger than 10 years, a diagnosis of ALL, and the intermediate-adverse cytogenetic risk group were associated with increased relapse. On the contrary, extramedullary disease (EMD) and aGvHD were only linked to worse PFS. These data suggested that although only one-third of the patients would obtain PFS over 2 years, salvaged allo-HSCT is still the most reliable and best therapeutic strategy for refractory pediatric acute leukemia. If probable, choosing a female donor, better management of aGvHD, and induction of cGvHD promotes patient survival.

Developing T-cell therapies for lymphoma without receptor engineering

T-cell therapy has emerged from the bench for the treatment of patients with lymphoma. Responses to T-cell therapeutics are regulated by multiple factors, including the patient's immune system status and disease stage. Outside of engineering of chimeric antigen receptors and artificial T-cell receptors, T-cell therapy can be mediated by ex vivo expansion of antigen-specific T cells targeting viral and/or nonviral tumor-associated antigens. These approaches are contributing to enhanced clinical responses and overall survival. In this review, we summarize the available T-cell therapeutics beyond receptor engineering for the treatment of patients with lymphoma.

Developing T-cell therapies for lymphoma without receptor engineering

T-cell therapy has emerged from the bench for the treatment of patients with lymphoma. Responses to T-cell therapeutics are regulated by multiple factors, including the patient's immune system status and disease stage. Outside of engineering of chimeric antigen receptors and artificial T-cell receptors, T-cell therapy can be mediated by ex vivo expansion of antigen-specific T cells targeting viral and/or nonviral tumor-associated antigens. These approaches are contributing to enhanced clinical responses and overall survival. In this review, we summarize the available T-cell therapeutics beyond receptor engineering for the treatment of patients with lymphoma.

Cell therapies for hematological malignancies: don't forget non-gene-modified t cells!

Cell therapy currently performs an important role in the treatment of patients with various hematological malignancies. The response to the cell therapy is regulated by multiple factors including the patient's immune system status, genetic profile, stage at diagnosis, age, and underlying disease. Cell therapy that does not require genetic manipulation can be mediated by donor lymphocyte infusion strategies, selective depletion in the post-transplant setting and the ex vivo expansion of antigen-specific T cells. For hematologic malignancies, cell therapy is contributing to enhanced clinical responses and overall survival and the immune response to cell therapy is predictive of response in multiple cancer types. In this review we summarize the available T cell therapeutics that do not rely on gene engineering for the treatment of patients with blood cancers.

Specific Adoptive Cellular Immunotherapy in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents a treatment option for a diversity of advanced hematopoietic malignancies providing hope for long-term responses especially due to immunogenic effects associated with the treatment modality. Despite respectable progress in the field, relapses and/or opportunistic infections are major reasons for the high treatment-related mortality. However, a number of novel immunotherapeutic approaches using defined cell populations have been developed to directly target residual malignant cells as well as defined infectious diseases. We here provide an overview of current adoptive cellular immunotherapies in the context of allo-HSCT and close with an outlook on new directions within the field.

Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide can mitigate GVHD and enhance the G-CSF/ATG induced GVHD protective activity and improve haploidentical transplant outcomes

Use of high-dose, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) results in low rates of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and favorable immune reconstitution, although with higher rates of relapse and somewhat high rates of graft failure. We hypothesized that permissible dose reduction of PTCy might be feasible. The current study attempts to establish a murine model and focus on regulatory T cells (Tregs) to clarify the immunological mechanisms for GVHD prevention by low-dose PTCy. In addition, a prospective, clinical cohort study in haploidentical, T-cell replete transplantation is initiated to support the rational. We found that acute GVHD could be alleviated by low-dose PTCy and could be further mitigated after the combined use of low-dose PTCy and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in mice. Flow-cytometric analyses in mice showed that low-dose PTCy could increase the number of Tregs and the effect on Tregs is significantly prominent with the combined use of low-dose PTCy and ATG. In the clinical cohort study, the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD in combined treatment cohort with low-dose PTCy and ATG/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (17%; 95% CI, 5-29%) was significantly lower than both that in matched-pair cohort (33%; 95% CI, 25-41%; P = 0.04) and that in historical cohort (56%; 95% CI, 42-70%; P < 0.001). In-vivo immune reconstitution analysis showed that low-dose PTCy could facilitate suppressive Tregs reconstitution. In conclusion, low-dose PTCy is sufficient for GVHD abrogation under lymphopenic situation and can enhance the protective effect of ATG/G-CSF on GVHD. Intensified conditioning followed by low-dose PTCy might be a feasible option for patients undergoing haploidentical transplantation.

Haploidentical transplantation compared with matched sibling and unrelated donor transplantation for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission

We retrospectively investigated outcomes of haploidentical donor (HID) transplant for adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) compared with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) and HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants. A total of 348 adult patients were enrolled, including 127 HID, 144 MSD and 77 MUD recipients. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 39·5%, 24·0% and 40·3% for HID, MSD and MUD, respectively (P = 0·020). However, there was no difference in grade III-IV aGVHD (11·4%, 7·7%, 13·5%, respectively, P = 0·468). The 5-year cumulative transplant-related mortality was 16·4%, 11·6% and 19·6% (P = 0·162), the 5-year relapse rate post-transplantation was 14·8%, 21·1% and 16·7% (P = 0·231), the 5-year overall survival was 70·1%, 73·7% and 69·8% (P = 0·525), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68·7%, 67·3% and 63·7%, respectively (P = 0·606). Furthermore, the 3-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was not different (50·8%, 54·9% and 52·2%, respectively, P = 0·847). Our results indicate that the outcomes of HID transplants are equivalent to those of MSD and MUD, and that HID transplantation is a valid alternative for standard-risk adults with ALL in CR1 who lack matched donors.

Haploidentical allograft is superior to matched sibling donor allograft in eradicating pre-transplantation minimal residual disease of AML patients as determined by multiparameter flow cytometry: a retrospective and prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effects of pre-transplantation minimal residual disease (pre-MRD) on outcomes in AML patients who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) or who received unmanipulated haploidentical allografts.

METHODS

A retrospective study (n = 339) and a prospective study (n = 340) were performed. MRD was determined using multiparameter flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Either after retrospective or prospective analysis, patients with negative pre-MRD (pre-MRDneg) had a lower incidence of relapse than those with positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) in MSDT settings (P < 0.001 for all), but relapse was comparable in Haplo-SCT settings for patients with pre-MRDneg versus pre-MRDpos (P = 0.866 and 0.161, respectively). In either the retrospective (n = 65) or the prospective study (n = 76), pre-MRDpos subjects receiving Haplo-SCT experienced a lower incidence of relapse than those who underwent MSDT (P < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Of the patients with pre-MRDpos in either the total (n = 141) or the subgroup excluding cases which received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; n = 105), those who underwent MSDT had a higher incidence of relapse than those receiving haplo-SCT (P < 0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis showed that, for pre-MRDpos cases, haplo-SCT was associated with a low incidence of relapse and with better LFS and OS in either retrospective group, prospective group, combination groups, or subgroup not including cases which received DLI.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that, for pre-MRD-positive AML patients, haplo-SCT was associated with lower incidence of relapse and better survival, suggesting a stronger anti-leukemia effect.

Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Followed by Minimal Residual Disease and Graft-versus-Host Disease-Guided Multiple DLIs Could Improve Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Acute Leukemia

Patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are still at a high risk for relapse post-transplant. To investigate the impact of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) followed by minimal residual disease (MRD) test and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-guided multiple DLIs to prevent relapse and improve survival in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who received allo-HSCT. A multicenter prospective study was designed. In total, 100 patients who achieved complete remission at 30 days post-transplant and had no uncontrolled infection, organ failure, or active GVHD were eligible First, prophylactic DLI was administered at 30 days after HLA-matched related HSCT or 45 to 60 days after HLA-matched unrelated HSCT or haploidentical HSCT. Subsequently, multiple DLIs were administered based on the results of MRD test and whether they developed GVHD. In addition to DLI, chemotherapy was also given to patients who had a positive MRD test. Three-year cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and survival post-transplant were 32.4% (95% confidence interval, 22.4% to 42.4%), 50.3% (95% confidence interval, 40.3% to 60.3%), and 51.4% (95% confidence interval, 41.2% to 61.6%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, a positive MRD test (HR, 3.840; 95% confidence interval, 1.678 to 5.784; P= .001) and receiving 1 course of DLI (HR, 4.346; 95% confidence interval, 1.223 to 9.450, P= .023) were associated with an increased relapse risks. These data suggest that prophylactic DLI followed by MRD test and GVHD-guided multiple DLIs reduced relapse and increased survival post-transplant in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia who received allo-HSCT. The study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01455272.

Allogeneic CD19-CAR-T cell infusion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in B cell malignancies

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered the cornerstone in treatment of hematological malignancies. However, relapse of the hematological disease after allo-HSCT remains a challenge and is associated with poor long-term survival. Chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells (CAR-T cells) can lead to disease remission in patients with relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies. However, the therapeutic window for infusion of CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT and its efficacy are debatable.

Main body

In this review, we first discuss the use of CAR-T cells for relapsed cases after allo-HSCT. We then review the toxicities and the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease in relapsed patients who received CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT. Finally, we review clinical trial registrations and the therapeutic time window for infusion of CAR-T cells post allo-HSCT.

Conclusions

The treatment of allogeneic CAR-T cells is beneficial for patients with relapsed B cell malignancies after allo-HSCT with low toxicities and complications. However, multicenter clinical trials with larger sample sizes should be performed to select the optimal therapeutic window and confirm its efficacy.