Results of salvage therapy with mini-hyper-CVD and inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Clinical use of measurable residual disease in adult ALL: recommendations from a panel of US experts

ABSTRACT

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a powerful predictor of clinical outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In addition to its clear prognostic importance, MRD information is increasingly used in clinical decision algorithms to guide therapeutic interventions. Although it is well established that achievement of MRD-negative remission is an important end point of ALL therapy, the prognostic and therapeutic implications of MRD in an individual patient are influenced by both disease-related factors (eg, cytomolecular risk) and assay-related factors (eg, sensitivity, specimen source, and timing of assessment), which add complexity to MRD-guided treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss the data supporting the use of MRD assessment in adult ALL and how this information can rationally inform clinical decisions, including selection of patients for MRD-directed therapies or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We also discuss important interpretative challenges related to novel high sensitivity next-generation sequencing-based MRD assays, which are becoming increasingly used in clinical practice.

Blinatumomab for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a real-world setting: clinical vignettes

Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager; inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), a CD22 antibody drug conjugate; and chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell constructs are novel immune-therapeutic options for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The use of blinatumomab has recently expanded to multiple B-ALL treatment settings. Despite the efficacy of blinatumomab, its use can be challenging in the real-world because of limited experience with its administration and management of toxicities. Optimal use and sequencing of blinatumomab is critical to improve outcomes, reduce undesired toxicities, and decrease discontinuation rates related to such toxicities. Herein, we discuss strategies to address the unique adverse effects of blinatumomab and ways to optimize its administration and integration into the treatment backbone of B-ALL. We outline our approach to combining and sequencing blinatumomab with other immunotherapies, such as INO and CD19 CAR T-cells, and provide recommendations for the management of toxicities and dose-optimization of blinatumomab therapy in clinical practice.

Antibody-Based and Other Novel Agents in Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Despite notable progress in managing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) over recent decades, particularly in pediatric cohorts where the 5-year overall survival (OS) reaches 90%, outcomes for the 10-15% with relapsed and refractory disease remain unfavorable. This disparity is further accentuated in adults, where individuals over the age of 40 years undergoing aggressive multiagent chemotherapy continue to have lower survival rates. While the adoption of pediatric-inspired treatment protocols has enhanced complete remission (CR) rates among younger adults, 20-30% of these patients experience relapse, resulting in a subsequent 5-year OS rate of 40-50%. For relapsed B-ALL in adults, there is no universally accepted standard salvage therapy, and the median OS is short. The cornerstone of B-ALL treatment continues to be the utilization of combined cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens to maximize early and durable disease control. In this manuscript, we go beyond the multiagent chemotherapy medications developed prior to the 1980s and focus on the incorporation of antibody-based therapy for B-ALL with an eye on existing and upcoming approved indications for blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, other monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products in frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. In addition, we discuss emerging investigational therapies that harness the therapeutic vulnerabilities of the disease through targeting apoptosis, modifying epigenetics, and inhibiting the mTOR pathway.

Parental occupational exposure to anticancer drugs and radiation: Risk of fetal loss and physical abnormalities in The Japan Environment and Children's Study

BACKGROUND

Many studies have indicated an association between maternal occupational exposure to hazardous agents, such as anticancer drugs and ionizing radiation, and an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirths or miscarriages and physical abnormalities in offspring. However, the effects of recent advancements in protective measures to reduce these risks have not been clarified. Aim To investigate the current impact of parental occupational exposure to anticancer drugs and ionizing radiation on stillbirths or miscarriages as well as physical abnormalities under the circumstances of the developed safety protocols.

METHODS

This cohort study utilized The Japan Environment and Children's Study dataset, which included 96,606 fetuses born between January 2011 and March 2014. This study focused on the association between occupational exposure to these agents during pregnancy and the incidence of stillbirths or miscarriages and physical abnormalities in offspring, employing Poisson regression models for adjusted relative risk.

RESULTS

From the study population, 471 cases of stillbirths or miscarriages and 4493 infants with physical abnormalities were identified. Fisher's exact tests indicated no significant differences in fetal loss or physical abnormalities between the exposure groups. A multivariable analysis also found no significant association between maternal exposure to anticancer drugs and ionizing radiation and these adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Under improved safety measures, maternal occupational exposure to anticancer drugs and ionizing radiation does not significantly affect the occurrence of stillbirths or miscarriages and physical abnormalities in offspring. These findings highlight the critical role of current safety practices and indicate lower reproductive risks with proper precautions.

Frontline immunotherapeutic combination strategies in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: reducing chemotherapy intensity and toxicity and harnessing efficacy

Using immunotherapeutic agents like inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), blinatumomab, or chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T)-cell therapy in frontline adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) therapy is promising. These agents are mostly well tolerated and have different toxicity profiles than conventional chemotherapy, enabling their combination with chemotherapy. Additionally, they have often been shown to overcome the traditional adverse ALL risk features. Recently blinatumomab was approved as part of consolidation therapy in MRD negative B-ALL; however, a significant proportion of patients had progressed or relapsed before reaching the timepoint of blinatumomab administration. Including InO/blinatumomab from induction onwards could induce earlier and deeper remissions. Modifications of dosing and administration schedules, as with the fractionated InO schedule with low-intensity chemotherapy, and subcutaneous blinatumomab, appear to reduce the toxicity and improve the anti-ALL efficacy. CAR T-cell therapies like brexucabtagene autoleucel as a consolidation approach have shown positive outcomes. The feasibility of using CAR T-cells to reduce the need for long-drawn maintenance and the need for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are questions of ongoing clinical trials. Newer generation CAR T-cell products like obecabtagene autoleucel appear as effective and safer. Better disease monitoring through next generation sequencing based measurable residual disease analysis could identify patients where treatment intensification including HSCT, or deintensification, is suitable.

Transplant in ALL: who, when, and how?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a cornerstone in the treatment of high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet optimal patient selection is challenging in the era of rapidly changing modern therapy. Refined molecular characterization allows for better risk assessment, sparing low-risk patients from allo-HCT toxicity while identifying those who may benefit from intensified approaches. Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a powerful predictor of relapse irrespective of treatment strategy, challenging the necessity of transplant in MRD-negative patients. Further, expanded donor options, particularly haploidentical transplantation coupled with reduced intensity conditioning, have extended the applicability of allo-HCT to a broader range of patients. Finally, immunotherapies and targeted treatments are increasingly integrated into both initial and relapsed treatment protocols yielding deep remission and allowing for successful transplant in patients with a history of advanced disease. In this review, we provide an overview of the contemporary role of transplant in adult patients with ALL, focusing on indications for allo-HCT in first remission, optimal sequencing of transplant with novel therapies, and advancements in donor selection and conditioning regimens.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Novel Agents and the Diminishing Role of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Outcomes of patients with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have improved remarkably in the past decade. This has largely been due to the development and introduction of novel immunotherapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and improved risk stratification, including better understanding of high risk genomic subgroups and better methods of measurable residual disease (MRD) detection. Historically, allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) has been the consolidative treatment of choice in first complete remission for fit adults with B-ALL. However, allo-SCT is associated with significant treatment-related mortality and morbidity. Current research is directed at the incorporation of novel immunotherapies into frontline regimens to improve depth and durability of responses and ultimately increase cure rates. In this review, we will discuss the emerging role of novel immune-based treated strategies in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. We present our approach to newly diagnosed patients with B-ALL and illustrate how the incorporation of novel agents and use of high-sensitivity MRD assays can abrogate the need for allo-SCT in most patients with B-ALL.

Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: ten frequently asked questions

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) constitutes a distinctive cytogenetic entity associated with challenging outcomes, particularly in adult patients. Current upfront chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies include first, second and third-generation TKIs that have revolutionized patient outcomes including molecular remission and overall survival. Chemotherapy-free regimens such as blinatumomab-dasatinib or blinatumomab-ponatinib offer exciting possibilities, yet challenges arise, particularly in preventing central nervous system relapse. Monitoring measurable residual disease is now a cornerstone particularly using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-Clonoseq for accurate assessment. Controversy regarding the ability to omit consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation, specifically for patients achieving early molecular remission, is related to the excellent survival achieved with novel combinations in the upfront setting, however challenged by the lower disease control when transplant is utilized beyond first remission. Post-transplant maintenance introduces new dilemmas: the optimal TKI, dosing, and duration of therapy are open questions. Meanwhile, a myriad of new combinations and cellular therapies are used for relapsed Ph+ ALL, prompting us to unravel the optimal sequencing of these promising regimen. In this review, we delve into the breakthroughs and controversies in Ph+ ALL with ten commonly asked questions.

Dose-Adjusted EPOCH Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell ALL: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial

Importance

Options for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma (B-ALL) are limited, and new approaches are needed. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has been combined with low-intensity chemotherapy, with modest improvements over historical controls, and dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH) treatment is safe and active for newly diagnosed ALL.

Objective

To assess the safety and clinical activity of DA-EPOCH and InO in adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, phase 1 dose-escalation trial included adults with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-ALL and was conducted between September 2019 and November 2022. At least 5% blood or marrow blasts or measurable extramedullary disease (EMD) was required for enrollment.

Interventions

DA-EPOCH was given on days 1 to 5, while InO was given on day 8 and day 15 of a 28-day cycle. Three dose levels were studied using a bayesian optimal interval design.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the maximum tolerated dose of InO when combined with DA-EPOCH, defined as the highest dose level that produced a rate of dose-limiting toxicity below 33%. Secondary objectives included response rates, survival estimates, and descriptions of toxic effects.

Results

A total of 24 participants were screened and enrolled (median age, 46 [range, 28-76] years; 15 [62%] male). The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3 (range, 1-12). Three of 11 participants (27%) treated at the highest dose level (InO, 0.6 mg/m2, on day 8 and day 15) experienced dose-limiting toxicity, making this the maximum tolerated dose. No deaths occurred during the study, and only 1 patient (4%; 95% CI, 0.1%-21%) developed sinusoidal obstructive syndrome after poststudy allograft. The morphologic complete response rate was 84% (95% CI, 60%-97%), 88% (95% CI, 62%-98%) of which was measurable residual disease negative by flow cytometry. Five of 6 participants with EMD experienced treatment response. The overall response rate was 83% (95% CI, 63%-95%). Median overall survival, duration of response, and event-free survival were 17.0 (95% CI, 8.4-not reached), 15.0 (95% CI, 6.7-not reached), and 9.6 (95% CI, 4.5-not reached) months, respectively.

Conclusions

In this study, adding InO to DA-EPOCH in adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL was feasible, with high response rates and sinusoidal obstructive syndrome occurring rarely in a heavily pretreated population. Many patients were able to proceed to poststudy consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Further investigation of this combination is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03991884.

Advances in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

There have been major paradigm shifts in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the last decade with the introduction of new immunotherapies and targeted agents, adoption of pediatric-type chemotherapy protocols in younger adults as well as chemotherapy light approaches in older adults and the incorporation of measurable residual disease (MRD) testing to inform clinical decision making. With this, treatment outcomes in adult Ph- ALL have improved across all age groups. However, a subset of patients will still develop relapsed disease, which can be challenging to treat and associated with poor outcomes. Here we review the treatment of Ph- ALL in both younger and older adults, including the latest advancements and future directions.

Antibody-drug conjugates combinations in cancer treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a promising class of anticancer agents. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to 12 compounds, with 2 later undergoing withdrawal. Moreover, several other compounds are currently under clinical development at different stages. Despite substantial antitumoral activity observed among different tumor types, adverse events and the development of resistance represent significant challenges in their use. Over the last years, an increasing number of clinical trials have been testing these drugs in different combinations with other anticancer agents, such as traditional chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and small targeted agents, reporting promising results based on possible synergistic effects and a potential for improved treatment outcomes among different tumor types. Here we will review combinations of ADCs with other antitumor agents aiming at describing the current state of the art and future directions.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Next Questions: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The integration of immune and targeted therapies into the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved outcomes, reduced the intensity and duration of chemotherapy, and the reliance on allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In younger patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative ALL, treatment with Hyper-CVAD and blinatumomab +/- inotuzumab has improved the 3-year overall survival (OS) to above 85%. In older patients, using less intensive chemotherapy (mini-Hyper-CVD) in combination with inotuzumab and blinatumomab has improved the 5-year OS rate to 50%. In Ph+ ALL, the chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab and ponatinib (or dasatinib) have become a new standard of care resulting in 3-year OS of 85% to 90%. Because the methotrexate-cytarabine courses were omitted in the nonchemotherapy regimens, central nervous system (CNS) relapses were noted, particularly in patients with a WBC count > 70 × 109/L, requiring to consider increasing the number of prophylactic intrathecals (from 12 to 15) and perhaps developing a CNS risk-directed high-dose systemic chemotherapy. In relapsed/refractory ALL, a dose-dense regimen integrating blinatumomab and inotuzumab with low-intensity chemotherapy followed by consolidation with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is being investigated. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) following ALL therapy is predictive of disease relapse. Using next-generation sequencing allows the detection of MRD at 1 × 10-6 which was shown to be superior to multiparameter flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction in predicting relapse, and could be used to decide on the duration of therapy or need to change therapy. Herein, we review the recent updates and areas of unmet need in ALL.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: past progress, current research and future directions

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate that was first evaluated in B-cell lymphomas but was subsequently shown to be highly effective in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). INO improved response rates and survival in a randomized study in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL, leading to its regulatory approval in the United States in 2017. While the formal approval for INO is as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory ALL, subsequent studies with INO administered in combination with chemotherapy and/or blinatumomab both in the frontline and salvage settings have yielded promising results. In this review, we discuss the clinical development of INO in ALL, highlighting lessons learned from the initial clinical trials of INO, as well as the many ongoing studies that are seeking to expand the role of INO in ALL.

Dose-Dense Mini-Hyper-CVD, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Blinatumomab Achieves Rapid MRD-Negativity in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

The combination of low-intensity chemotherapy and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), with sequential blinatumomab, is highly effective in older adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and in relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL. Earlier, "dose-dense" administration of blinatumomab could lead to earlier and deeper measurable residual disease (MRD) responses and better outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of mini-hyper-CVD (mini-hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with mini-methotrexate and cytarabine), INO, and blinatumomab in patients with B-cell ALL.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were treated (frontline, n = 9; MRD consolidation, n = 4; relapsed/refractory, n = 8). In the frontline cohort, all patients achieved CR/CRi and MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. Across the frontline and MRD consolidation cohorts, 10/11 patients (91%) achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10-6, including 6/10 evaluable patients (60%) who achieved next-generation sequencing MRD negativity after cycle 1. The CR/CRi rate in the relapsed/refractory cohort was 63%, and all responders achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry at the end of cycle 1. The 1-year overall survival rate for the combined cohort of the frontline and MRD-positive patients was 83%. No new safety signals were observed with the dose-dense mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab regimen.

CONCLUSION

Dose-dense delivery of mini-hyper-CVD, INO, and blinatumomab was safe and resulted in rapid and deep MRD negativity in patients with B-cell ALL. This regimen is now being prospectively evaluated in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings.

Single agent subcutaneous blinatumomab for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule that redirects CD3+ T-cells to engage and lyse CD19+ target cells. Here we demonstrate that subcutaneous (SC) blinatumomab can provide high efficacy and greater convenience of administration. In the expansion phase of a multi-institutional phase 1b trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04521231), heavily pretreated adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) received SC blinatumomab at two doses: (1) 250 μg once daily (QD) for week 1 and 500 μg three times weekly (TIW) thereafter (250 μg/500 μg) or (2) 500 μg QD for week 1 and 1000 μg TIW thereafter (500 μg/1000 μg). The primary endpoint was complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) within two cycles. At the data cutoff of September 15, 2023, 29 patients were treated: 14 at the 250 μg/500 μg dose and 13 at 500 μg/1000 μg dose. Data from two ineligible patients were excluded. At the end of two cycles, 12 of 14 patients (85.7%) from the 250 μg/500 μg dose achieved CR/CRh of which nine patients (75.0%) were negative for measurable residual disease (MRD; <10-4 leukemic blasts). At the 500 μg/1000 μg dose, 12 of 13 patients (92.3%) achieved CR/CRh; all 12 patients (100.0%) were MRD-negative. No treatment-related grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurologic events (NEs) were reported. SC injections were well tolerated and all treatment-related grade 3 CRS and NEs responded to standard-of-care management, interruption, or discontinuation. Treatment with SC blinatumomab resulted in high efficacy, with high MRD-negativity rates and acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated adults with R/R B-ALL.

Incidence and risk factors of early onset VOD/SOS differ in younger vs older adults after stem cell transplantation

ABSTRACT

Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Although increasing awareness and modern transplant techniques have mitigated risk, the interaction of historic risk factors in the current era with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is unknown. We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of adult patients aged ≥18 years undergoing allo-SCT (N = 1561) using predominately PTCy as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (72%). We found a higher rate of VOD at 16.8% (20 of 119) in those aged ≤25 years compared with 3.8% (55 of 1442) in those aged >25 years, with unique predictors of VOD within each cohort. Multivariate classification and regression tree (CART) analysis confirmed age as the primary independent determinant of the rate of VOD. Among patients aged 18 to 25 years, disease risk index (DRI; 31% with high/very high DRI vs 12% low/intermediate DRI; P = .03) and prior lines of chemotherapy (24% with >1 vs 6% with ≤1; P = .03) were the strongest predictors of VOD. Incidence of VOD in patients aged >25 years of age consistently ranged between 3% and 5% across most risk factors evaluated, with only hepatic factors (baseline elevation of bilirubin, aspartate transferase, alanine aminotransferase) or gemtuzumab exposure associated with increased rates of VOD. There was no significant difference in rates of VOD in those receiving PTCy compared with those receiving alternate GVHD prophylaxis. Our data highlight the differences in incidence and predictors of VOD between younger (≤25) and older (>25) adults undergoing allo-SCT.

A phase 1/2 study of mini-hyper-CVD plus venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

ABSTRACT

Preclinical studies suggest that Bcl-2 inhibition with venetoclax has antileukemic activity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and may synergize with conventional chemotherapy. We designed a phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-intensity chemotherapy in combination with venetoclax in adults with relapsed or refractory ALL. Patients received the mini-hyper-CVD regimen (dose-attenuated hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine) in combination with venetoclax (200 mg or 400 mg daily) on days 1 to 14 in cycle 1 and on days 1 to 7 in consolidation cycles. Twenty-two patients were treated. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-6). Thirteen patients (59%) had undergone prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), and 7 of 18 patients (39%) with B-cell ALL had previously received both inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab. The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax in the combination regimen was 400 mg daily. The composite complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was 57% (CR, 43%; CRi, 14%), and 45% of responders achieved measurable residual disease negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry. Four patients proceeded to allo-SCT. The median duration of response was 6.3 months. The median overall survival was 7.1 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 29%. The most common grade ≥3 nonhematologic adverse events were infection in 17 patients (77%) and febrile neutropenia in 4 patients (18%). Overall, the combination of mini-hyper-CVD plus venetoclax was active in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory ALL. Further development of venetoclax-based combinations in ALL is warranted. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03808610.

Diagnostic and therapeutic advances in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of gene analysis and targeted immunotherapy

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most rapidly changing hematological malignancies with advanced understanding of the genetic landscape, detection methods of minimal residual disease (MRD), and the development of immunotherapeutic agents with good clinical outcomes. The annual incidence of adult ALL in Korea is 300-350 patients per year. The WHO classification of ALL was revised in 2022 to reflect the molecular cytogenetic features and suggest new adverse- risk subgroups, such as Ph-like ALL and ETP-ALL. We continue to use traditional adverse-risk features and cytogenetics, with MRD-directed post-remission therapy including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, with the introduction of novel agents, such as ponatinib, blinatumomab, and inotuzumab ozogamicin incorporated into frontline therapy, good MRD responses have been achieved, and overall survival outcomes are improving. Accordingly, some clinical trials have suggested a possible era of chemotherapy-free or transplantation-free approaches in the near future. Nevertheless, relapse of refractory ALL still occurs, and some poor ALL subtypes, such as Ph-like ALL and ETP-ALL, are unsolved problems for which novel agents and treatment strategies are needed. In this review, we summarize the currently applied diagnostic and therapeutic practices in the era of advanced genetic analysis and targeted immunotherapies in United States and Europe and introduce real-world Korean data.

Targeting CD22 for B-cell hematologic malignancies

CD19-targeted chimeric receptor antigen (CAR)-T cell therapy has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. However, 30%-60% of patients eventually relapsed, with the CD19-negative relapse being an important hurdle to sustained remission. CD22 expression is independent of CD19 expression in malignant B cells. Consequently, CD22 is a potential alternative target for CD19 CAR-T cell-resistant patients. CD22-targeted therapies, mainly including the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and CAR-T cells, have come into wide clinical use with acceptable toxicities and promising efficacy. In this review, we explore the molecular and physiological characteristics of CD22, development of CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cells, and the available clinical data on CD22 ADCs and CAR-T cell therapies. Furthermore, we propose some perspectives for overcoming tumor escape and enhancing the efficacy of CD22-targeted therapies.

Progress of research on PD-1/PD-L1 in leukemia

Leukemia cells prevent immune system from clearing tumor cells by inducing the immunosuppression of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. In recent years, further understanding of the BM microenvironment and immune landscape of leukemia has resulted in the introduction of several immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engager, antibody drug conjugates, and cellular therapies in clinical trials. Among them, the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis is a significant checkpoint for controlling immune responses, the PD-1 receptor on tumor-infiltrating T cells is bound by PD-L1 on leukemia cells. Consequently, the activation of tumor reactive T cells is inhibited and their apoptosis is promoted, preventing the rejection of the tumor by immune system and thus resulting in the occurrence of immune tolerance. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis serves as a significant mechanism by which tumor cells evade immune surveillance, and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of lymphomas and varieties of solid tumors. However, the development of drugs targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in leukemia remains in the clinical-trial stage. In this review, we tally up the basic research and clinical trials on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in leukemia, as well as discuss the relevant toxicity and impacts of PD-1/PD-L1 on other immunotherapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, bi-specific T-cell engager, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy.

Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Sequential Use for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-Life Campus All Study

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab (Blina) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has improved the outcome of relapsed/refractory B-lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, little is known about the outcome after recurrence and re-treatment with immunotherapy.

METHODS

We describe 71 R/R B-ALL patients treated for different relapses with Blina and InO. Blina was the first treatment in 57 patients and InO in 14. Twenty-seven patients had a previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

RESULTS

In the Blina/InO group, after Blina, 36 patients (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), with 42% of negative minimal residual disease (MRD-); after InO, a CR was achieved in 47 patients (82%, 34 MRD-). In the InO/Blina group, after InO, 13 cases (93%) reached a CR (6 MRD-); after Blina, a CR was re-achieved in 6 cases (43%, 3 MRD-). Twenty-six patients proceeded to allo-HSCT. In the Blina/InO group, the median overall survival (OS) was 19 months; the disease-free survival (DFS) after Blina was 7.4 months (11.6 vs. 2.7 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.03) and after InO, 5.4 months. In the InO/Blina group, the median OS was 9.4 months; the median DFS after InO was 5.1 months and 1.5 months after Blina (8.7 vs. 2.5 months in MRD- vs. MRD+, p = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 16.5 months from the start of immunotherapy, 24 patients (34%) are alive and 16 (22%) are alive in CR.

CONCLUSION

In our series of R/R B-ALL, Blina and InO treatment demonstrate efficacy for subsequent relapses in terms of MRD response, OS and DFS, and as a bridge to allo-HSCT.