Low dose clomiphene citrate as a mild stimulation protocol in women with unsuspected poor in vitro fertilization result can generate more oocytes with optimal cumulative pregnancy rate

The cumulative live birth rate and cost-effectiveness of the clomiphene and gonadotropin cotreatment protocol versus the mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol in women over 35 years old

The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].

Low-dose clomiphene citrate does not reduce implantation and live birth rates in otherwise unstimulated modified natural cycle IVF-retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does antioestrogen effect of clomiphene citrate (CC) on the endometrium reduce implantation and thereby decrease pregnancy and live birth rate per transferred embryo?

METHODS

In this cohort, unstimulated IVF cycles modified with clomiphene citrate (CC-NC-IVF) and unstimulated, natural IVF cycles (NC-IVF) conducted between 2011 and 2016 were included. CC was applied in a dosage of 25mcg per day, starting on cycle day 7 until ovulation trigger day. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, defined as amniotic sac visible in ultrasound, and live birth rate per transferred embryo. Miscarriage rate calculated as amniotic sac not ending in a live birth was secondary outcome. A modified mixed-effect Poisson regression model was applied, and adjustments were made for female age, parity, type and cause of infertility. Additionally, stratification by parity and age was performed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety-nine couples underwent a total of 1042 IVF cycles, 453 being NC-IVF and 589 being CC-NC-IVF cycles. Baseline characteristics of both groups did not differ. Addition of CC did neither decrease clinical pregnancy rate (aRR 0.86; 95% CI 0.67-1.12) nor live birth rate per transferred embryo (aRR 0.84; 95% CI 0.62-1.13) in comparison with NC-IVF. Miscarriage rate did not differ between CC-NC-IVF and NC-IVF (aRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.57).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CC does not reduce pregnancy or live birth rate per transferred embryo. It can be used in infertility treatment without negatively affecting the endometrium and implantation.

Inclusion Complex of Clomiphene Citrate with Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for Intravenous Injection: Formulation and Stability Studies

Clomiphene citrate is the first-line treatment for women with abnormal or failed ovulation. Currently, it is available as oral tablets, and the parenteral formulation does not exist. In this study, we prepared clomiphene citrate-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex for its use in intravenous injection. The inclusion complex was characterized in the liquid state (phase solubility) and solid state by differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analyses. The sterile intravenous injection containing 0.5% clomiphene citrate was prepared and characterized for its physical properties, assay, pH, and osmolality. A stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the injection was developed. The HPLC method was validated for the assay, linearity, precision and repeatability, benchtop stability, and forced degradation to elute clomiphene isomers from the degradation products. The injection was packed in sterile 10-ml glass vials with butyl rubber stoppers and stored at 40°C, room temperature, and 4°C. The samples at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months were analyzed for clarity, pH, osmolality, and drug assay. The HPLC method was linear (R² = 0.9999), precise (0.86% relative standard deviation), and stability indicating. The stability data at the accelerated (40°C) storage condition for 6 months showed satisfactory results: the drug assay in the injection was between 90 and 105%, the injection remained clear, pH was between 4.0 and 4.4, and osmolality was between 270 and 350 mOsm. The stability data suggests that the product is stable and meets the given analytical specifications.

ART strategies in Klinefelter syndrome

PURPOSE

Patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) who receive assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment often experience poor pregnancy rates due to decreased fertilization, cleavage, and implantation rates and even an increased miscarriage rate. Mounting evidence from recent studies has shown that various technological advances and approaches could facilitate the success of ART treatment for KS patients. In this review, we summarize the methods for guiding KS patients during ART and for developing optimal strategies for preserving fertility, improving pregnancy rate and live birth rate, and avoiding the birth of KS infants.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar publications related to KS patients on topics of controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, sperm extraction, fertility preservation, gamete artificial activation, round spermatid injection (ROSI), and non-invasive prenatal screening (PGD) methods.

RESULTS

This review outlines the different ovulation-inducing treatments for female partners according to the individual sperm status in the KS patient. We further summarize the methods of retrieving sperm, storing, and freezing rare sperm. We reviewed different methods of gamete artificial activation and discussed the feasibility of ROSI for sterile KS patients who absolutely lack sperm. The activation of eggs in the process of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and non-invasive PGD are urgently needed to prevent the birth of KS infants.

CONCLUSION

The integrated strategies will pave the way for the establishment of ART treatment approaches and improve the clinical outcome for KS patients.

Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of mild ovarian stimulation protocol and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

METHODS

This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2013 to September 2015, including 191 patients who met the Bologna criteria of POR. Ninety-seven patients allocated to the mild ovarian stimulation group (MS group) were stimulated according to the letrozole/antagonist protocol, while 94 patients in the controlled ovarian stimulation group (COS group) were stimulated according to a high dose of gonadotropin (Gn) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) stop protocol. The cumulative live birth rate was the primary outcome. Chinese clinical trial number ChiCTR-TRC-13003454.

RESULTS

Comparing with the COS group, both the stimulation duration and the total gonadotropin dose were significantly shorter and lower in the MS group (P < 0.001). A higher number of retrieved oocytes (P = 0.003) and transferrable embryos (P = 0.029) were obtained in the COS group. The cumulative live birth rates (OR 1.103; 95% CI 0.53 to 2.28; P = 0.791) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase of Gn dose during ovulation stimulation was associated with a higher number of transferrable embryos for POR patients, but this increase did not lead to a concomitant improvement of reproductive outcome, especially in terms of the cumulative live birth rate. Using a mild stimulation protocol was economically preferential while it was as effective as higher doses of Gn stimulation protocol in reproductive outcome for POR patients.

Ovarian Stimulation Increases the Risk of Fetal Cardiac Defects of Pups Exposed to Severe Maternal Hyperglycemia

Objectives

To study the incidence of congenital heart defects (CHD) in offspring born to hyperglycemic mothers with and without ovarian stimulation.

Design

Reproductive biology.

Setting

Mouse model.

Patients

N/A.

Intervention

Hyperglycemia was induced in CD-1 wild type female mice using a single intraperitoneal dose of 150 mg/kg of streptozotocin. Stimulated dams (SD); (n=3) were injected with pregnant mare serum and human chorionic gonadotropin 48 hours apart. Non-stimulated dams (NSD); (n=4) were not injected. Both groups were mated with normal male CD-1 mice for timed pregnancies. Fetal hearts were extracted on embryonic day 16.5 and histological analyses was performed. Student's t-tests were employed to compare the incidence of cardiac defects in the SD and NSD groups. P ≤ 0.05 was significant.

Main Uutcome Measure

The incidence of CHD in progeny of diabetic dams with and without ovarian hyperstimulation.

Results & Conclusions

The average litter size was higher in SD compared to NSD. The average blood glucose for the SD and NSD was similar. Overall, the incidence of cardiac malformations did not differ between the two groups. However, in severe maternal hyperglycemia (>400 mg/dL), there was a higher incidence of fetal cardiac malformations in the pups born to SD vs NSD.