Endometriosis does not confer improved prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective study at a single institute

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma: open questions on the management and treatment algorithm

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) accounts for ~10% of all epithelial ovarian cancers and is considered a different entity from the more common high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), with distinct clinical presentations, different risk, and prognostic factors, and specific molecular features. Most OCCCs are diagnosed at an early stage and show favorable outcomes, in contrast to those diagnosed at advanced stages, which exhibit intrinsic resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and a very poor prognosis. The standard treatment of advanced OCCC is currently based on primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy according to recent international guidelines. However, these recommendations are extrapolated from several trials mainly featuring a large cohort of HGSC, with only a small minority of OCCC. Because of its rarity, many questions remain unanswered regarding the surgical and medical treatment. Lymph node staging, fertility-sparing treatment, the use of targeted therapies and radiotherapy as well as the adjuvant treatment for early-stage disease and second or further lines of chemotherapy are still under debate. This review aims to address these unresolved issues, by providing a comprehensive overview of the current data on this disease, and to suggest possible directions for future research.

Validation of Tumor Budding as a Prognostic Factor in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Using an Independent Cohort

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is an endometriosis-related neoplasm, in which traditional histologic grading does not show prognostic significance. Tumor budding was associated with poorer outcomes in OCCC in previous studies. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor budding in OCCC in an independent cohort. Seventy patients diagnosed with OCCC were retrospectively identified. Slides from primary ovarian resections were reviewed by 2 pathologists blinded to outcomes. Tumor budding was defined as single or clusters of <5 tumor cells in peritumoral and/or intratumoral nonhyalinized stroma. Most patients were diagnosed at an early stage (stage I: 69%; II: 20%; III: 10%; IV: 1%). Twenty-one patients experienced recurrences (30%) and 2 progressive disease (3%). At the last follow-up, 52 patients had no evidence of disease, 6 were alive with disease, and 12 died of disease. The median follow-up time was 66.7 mo. Tumor budding was identified in 41 cases (59%) with a kappa coefficient of 0.60. On univariate analysis, tumor budding (P=0.022) and stage (P=0.0005) were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS), but only stage was independently associated with shorter PFS on multivariate analysis (P=0.003). Higher stage was the only variable associated with shorter overall survival (P=0.037). Tumor budding was associated with higher stage (P=0.039), absence of endometriosis (P=0.042) and adenofibroma (P=0.046), tumor-associated inflammation (P=0.002), and higher mitotic activity (P=0.022). There was no association between tumor budding and molecular characteristics in 32 cases with somatic tumor sequencing. Tumor budding was not independently associated with worse outcomes in this cohort of OCCC, although it was significantly associated with specific clinicopathologic features, including higher stage. Stage was the only independent variable predictive of poorer survival, which appears to drive the prognostic significance of tumor budding.

Endometriosis and epithelial ovarian cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Endometriosis, a prevalent condition, has long been recognized as a chronic and debilitating ailment affecting an estimated 1790 million women worldwide. Observational studies have established a correlation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Thus, we endeavored to employ Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization, utilizing summary statistics from a Genome-Wide Association Study of endometriosis and epithelial ovarian cancer, with genetic markers serving as proxies for epithelial ovarian cancer. The analysis revealed a significant correlation between these entities, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.11-1.36). Upon histotype-specific examination, robust evidence emerged for an association of endometriosis with the risk of endometrioid carcinoma (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.81), clear cell carcinoma (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.75-3.73), and low malignant potential tumors (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.53). These findings provide a theoretical framework for prospective investigations aimed at enhancing the potential therapeutic efficacy of managing endometriosis in averting the onset and progression of ovarian cancer.

Correlation of clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between endometriosis-associated and primary ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to establish the clinicopathological and prognostic correlations between endometriosis-associated and non-endometriosis-associated primary ovarian cancer, with a view to providing a reference guide for revision of diagnostic criteria for malignant transformation of endometriosis.

METHODS

Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 174 patients with clear cell and endometrial ovarian cancer were retrospectively extracted. Cases were divided into endometriosis-associated and non-endometriosis-associated primary ovarian cancer for comparative analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.

RESULTS

Average age and post-menopausal rate in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group were lower relative to the primary ovarian cancer group (P < 0.05). Body mass index, age at menopause, operation history, dysmenorrhea, complications, tumor size, tumor side, ascites, CA125, HE4, CA19.9, stage, differentiation, expression of ER, PR, P53, P16, Ki67, MMR, HNF-1β and Napsin A were not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, rates of resistance to platinum chemotherapy, relapse, progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis-associated and primary ovarian cancers of the same pathological type are speculated to be homologous in terms of origin from malignant transformation of endometriosis. It may therefore be necessary to revise the diagnostic criteria for ovarian endometriosis malignancy.

A preoperative nomogram incorporating CT to predict the probability of ovarian clear cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables from preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for their ability to distinguish ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) from non-OCCC and to develop a nomogram to preoperatively predict the probability of OCCC.

METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent surgery for an ovarian tumor from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2016 and CECT of the abdomen and pelvis ≤90 days before primary debulking surgery. Using a standardized form, two experienced oncologic radiologists independently analyzed imaging features and provided a subjective 5-point impression of the probability of the histological diagnosis. Nomogram models incorporating clinical, laboratory, and radiological features were created to predict histological diagnosis of OCCC over non-OCCC.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 533 patients with surgically confirmed OCCC (n = 61) and non-OCCC (n = 472); history of endometriosis was more often found in patients with OCCC (20% versus 3.6%; p < 0.001), while CA-125 was significantly higher in patients with non-OCCC (351 ng/mL versus 70 ng/mL; p < 0.001). A nomogram model incorporating clinical (age, history of endometriosis and adenomyosis), laboratory (CA-125) and imaging findings (peritoneal implant distribution, morphology, laterality, and diameter of ovarian lesion and of the largest solid component) had an AUC of 0.9 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.949), which was comparable to the AUCs of the experienced radiologists' subjective impressions [0.8 (95% CI: 0.822, 0.891) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.865, 0.936)].

CONCLUSIONS

A presurgical nomogram model incorporating readily accessible clinical, laboratory, and CECT variables was a powerful predictor of OCCC, a subtype often requiring a distinctive treatment approach.

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma with or without endometriosis origin in a single institution cohort

BACKGROUND

As ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) has distinct clinical features, biology, genetic characteristics and mechanisms of pathogenesis, and whether the origin of endometriosis or not affects the prognosis of OCCC remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected medical records and follow-up data of patients with OCCC treated at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 2009 to December 2019. Further, we divided patients into 2 groups. Group 1: non-endometriosis origin; Group 2: endometriosis origin. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of one hundred and twenty-five patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma were identified and included. In the overall patients' population, the 5 year overall survival was 84.8%, the mean overall survival was 85.9 months. The results of the stratified analysis showed that early stage (FIGO stage I/II) OCCC had a good prognosis. The results of univariate analyses indicated that a statistically significant relationship between overall survival (OS) and FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, peritoneum metastasis, chemotherapy administration methods, Chinese herbal treatment, molecular target therapy. As for progression-free survival (PFS), a significant relationship between PFS and child-bearing history, largest residual tumor size, FIGO stage, tumor maximum diameter, lymph node metastasis was found, respectively. FIGO stage and lymph node metastasis are common poor prognostic factors affecting OS and PFS. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that FIGO stage (p = 0.028; HR, 1.944; 95% CI 1.073-3.52) and treatment by Chinese herbs (p = 0.018; HR, 0.141; 95% CI 0.028-0.716) were identified as influencing factors with regard to survival. The presence or absence of lymphadenectomy did not affect OS of 125 OCCC patients (p = 0.851; HR, 0.825; 95% CI 0.111-6.153). There was a trend towards a better prognosis for patients with OCCC of endometriosis origin than those with OCCC of non-endometriosis origin (p = 0.062; HR, 0.432; 95% CI 0.179-1.045). The two groups differed with respect to several clinicopathological factors. And the proportion of patients with disease relapse was higher in Group 1 (46.9%) than in Group 2 (25.0%), with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical staging and treatment by Chinese herbs postoperatively are two independent prognostic factors affecting the OS of OCCC, early detection and Chinese herbal medicine combined with chemotherapy postoperatively may be a good choice. Tumor with endometriosis-origin was found less likely to relapse. While the non-necessity of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer has been proven, the need for lymphadenectomy in the early stage ovarian cancer, including early stage OCCC, still deserved to be explored.

Advanced Stage Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma Mimicking Uterine Sarcoma Without Gross Residual Tumor During Primary Surgery: A Case Report

Background:

Clear cell ovarian carcinoma is rare and accounts for 1%-12% of ovarian epithelial carcinomas, depending on ethnicity. The prevalence of clear cell ovarian carcinoma in Asian, White, and Black women is 11.1%%, 4.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows that clear cell ovarian carcinomas are typically unilocular cyst-solid (34.9%) or multilocular-solid (41.4%); only 23.7% are solid with papillary projections. MRI can detect clear cell ovarian carcinoma with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 87%, respectively. Notably, sometimes ovarian masses have a solid feature and should be differentiated from uterine masses. Clear cell ovarian carcinoma has a better prognosis compared to serous carcinoma when diagnosed at an early stage, but it has a poorer prognosis at an advanced stage. The absence of a residual tumor is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with advanced-stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma. Herein, we present a case in which clear cell ovarian carcinoma was misdiagnosed as uterine sarcoma because imaging showed a mass with a solid uterine-like and necrotic area. In the present case, cytoreductive surgery was performed to remove the entire tumor and its infiltration to the sigmoid colon and left ureter. Hence, the patient had a better prognosis.

Case report:

A 57-year-old Indonesian woman presented to our hospital (Dr. Soetomo General Hospital) with post-menopausal bleeding, a large solid pelvic mass, and abdominal discomfort. The patient was diagnosed with uterine sarcoma due to the solid feature observed during ultrasonography and MRI. During the surgery, the mass was observed to originate from the left ovary, and primary debulking surgery with a multidisciplinary team was performed with zero residual tumor tissue. The tumor was histopathologically confirmed as clear cell carcinoma.

Conclusion:

MRI of clear cell ovarian carcinoma can be misdiagnosed as uterine sarcoma due to its solid feature. Additionally, the enlarged mass distorts the anatomical landmarks. Surgery with no residual tumor improves the prognosis for advanced-stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma.

Patients with stage IA ovarian clear cell carcinoma do not require chemotherapy following surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is an infrequent histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The present study aimed to investigate whether chemotherapy is indispensable for patients with stage IA OCCC.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. All subjects were diagnosed with stage IA OCCC, according to their postoperative pathological reports. In the present study, 1038 patients were retrospectively investigated, among whom 692 patients received chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to prevent selection bias. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the correlation between variables and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

An equal number of patients (n = 346) who did or did not undergo chemotherapy after PSM were further enrolled in the study. The results showed that the mortality of OCCC increased for the patients aged ≥50 years. In addition, older age was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (p < 0.05). However, chemotherapy did not extend the 5-year overall survival (p = 0.524) of patients with stage IA OCCC, according to the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy did not affect the overall survival of patients with stage IA OCCC following surgery.

Tumor Size Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value and stratification cutoff point for tumor size in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (version: SEER 8.3.9). Patients diagnosed with stage I OCCC from 1988 to 2018 were included for further analysis. X-Tile software was used to identify the potential cutoff point for tumor size. Stratification analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting analysis were used to balance the potential confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1,000 stage I OCCC patients were included. Of these 1,000 patients, median follow-up was 106 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89-112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, age at diagnosis, and stage IC were significantly associated with stage I OCCC patients. Eight centimeters is a promising cutoff point that can divide stage I OCCC patients into a good or a poor prognosis group. After controlling potential confounding factors with propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting, we demonstrated that stage I OCCC patients with tumor size ≤ 8 cm enjoyed a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS, 89.8% vs. 81%, p < 0.0001). Tumor size ≤ 8 cm was an independent prognostic factor of stage I OCCC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5608, 95% CI: 0.4126-0.7622, p = 0.0002).

Conclusions

Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for stage I OCCC, and 8 cm is a promising cutoff point for tumor size for risk stratification. However, using tumor size in the stratification management of stage I OCCC patients warrants further investigation.

Friend or foe? The prognostic role of endometriosis in women with clear cell ovarian carcinoma. A UK population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

The prognostic role of endometriosis amongst women with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) remains debatable. The aim of this study was to ascertain the effect of endometriosis on the prognosis of OCCC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of 94 women diagnosed and treated for OCCC at a tertiary gynaecological cancer centre in the UK, spanning the period 2010-2019. Women were divided into two groups according to the presence of endometriosis. Clinico-pathological characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were collated between the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-six cases of endometriosis-free OCCC (Ef-OCCC) were collated with 48 cases of endometriosis-related OCCC (Er-OCCC). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding age (p-value = 0.2), FIGO stage (p-value = 0.8), residual disease (RD) (p-value = 0.07), adjuvant chemotherapy agent (p-value = 0.4) or chemo-resistance (p-value = 0.9). The presence of endometriosis did not significantly affect either OS or PFS. The median OS in the Ef-OCCC and Er-OCCC was 55.00 (95% CI 32.00-189.00) and 71.00 (95% CI 47.00-97.00; log rank = 1.35, p-value = 0.2) months. The median PFS in the Ef-OCCC and Er-OCCC group was 39.00 (95% CI 19.00-143.00) and 39.00 (95% CI 19.00-62.00; log rank = 0.7, p-value = 0.4) months. Survival differences between the two groups were not significant after stratification analysis for independent prognosticators.

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis was not independently associated with the prognosis of OCCC either in crude analysis or after stratification for stage and RD. Further larger, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to draw firmer conclusions on the intrinsic link between endometriosis and OCCC.

An Overview of Ovarian Cancer: Molecular Processes Involved and Development of Target-based Chemotherapeutics

Ovarian cancer is one of the leading gynecologic diseases with a high mortality rate worldwide. Current statistical studies on cancer reveal that over the past two decades, the fifth most common cause of death related to cancer in females of the western world is ovarian cancer. In spite of significant strides made in genomics, proteomics and radiomics, there has been little progress in transitioning these research advances into effective clinical administration of ovarian cancer. Consequently, researchers have diverted their attention to finding various molecular processes involved in the development of this cancer and how these processes can be exploited to develop potential chemotherapeutics to treat this cancer. The present review gives an overview of these studies which may update the researchers on where we stand and where to go further. The unfortunate situation with ovarian cancer that still exists is that most patients with it do not show any symptoms until the disease has moved to an advanced stage. Undoubtedly, several targets-based drugs have been developed to treat it, but drug-resistance and the recurrence of this disease are still a problem. For the development of potential chemotherapeutics for ovarian cancer, however, some theoretical approaches have also been applied. A description of such methods and their success in this direction is also covered in this review.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is a rare and distinct histotype of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Women diagnosed with clear cell carcinomas are usually younger and diagnosed at earlier stages than those with the most common high-grade serous histology. Endometriosis is considered a main risk factor for the development of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary, and it can be considered a precursor of of this tumor, as it is identified in more than 50% of patients with clear cell carcinoma. Different molecular pathways and alterations heve been identified in ovarian clear cell carcinoma, including the most common mutations of AT-rich interaction domain 1A [ARID1A] and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase [PIK3] catalytic subunit alpha [PIK3CA]. The prognosis of patients at early stage is favorable, while patients with advanced or recurrent disease experience a poor oncologic outcomes. Despite a lower rate of responses due to an intrinsic chemoresistance, the treatment strategy for advanced disease resembles the treatment of high-grade serous carcinoma, which includes aggressive cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. For this reason, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I disease undergoing complete surgical staging is still under debate. Alternative treatments, including biological agents that target different pathways constitute the most promising treatment strategies, and well-designed, collaborative international trials should be designed in order to improve the oncologic outcomes and the quality of life of patients with this aggressive disease.

Comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients with clear cell ovarian carcinoma associated with and without endometriosis

PURPOSE

To compare clinical characteristics, surgical and oncologic outcomes of clear cell ovarian cancer among patients with cancer arising from endometriosis, cancer coexisting with endometriosis, and cancer without endometriosis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with clear cell ovarian cancer during January 1998-March 2013 was performed. All histopathology specimens were reviewed by a gynecologic pathologist and classified into one of the three following endometriosis status groups: arising group, coexisting group, or without group. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, surgical morbidities, response rate, recurrence rate, and cancer-specific death.

RESULTS

Finally, 249 patients were included. There were 82, 96, and 71 patients in the arising, coexisting, and without groups, respectively. Regarding baseline characteristics among groups, the without group was significantly older and had more advanced diseases. There was a significant difference in progression-free survival between the arising group and the without group (p = 0.003). Five-year progression-free survival rates were 62.8% in the arising group, 50.2% in the coexisting group, and 38.3% in the without group. DSS was not significantly different among groups. Multivariate analysis revealed ovarian surface invasion (HR = 2.76) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR = 0.39) to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival, whereas no remission after primary treatment (HR = 8.03) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR = 0.21) were prognostic factors for DSS. Intraoperative blood loss and residual tumor were significantly higher in the without group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis status was found not to significantly influence surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients with clear cell ovarian cancer.