1
|
Michel AM, Yi H, Amenta J, Collins N, Vaynrub A, Umakanth S, Anderson G, Arnold K, Law C, Pruthi S, Sandoval-Leon A, Shirley R, Perdekamp MG, Colonna S, Krisher S, King T, Yee LD, Ballinger TJ, Braun-Inglis C, Mangino DA, Wisinski K, DeYoung CA, Ross M, Floyd J, Kaster A, VanderWalde L, Saphner TJ, Zarwan C, Lo S, Graham C, Conlin A, Yost K, Agnese D, Jernigan C, Hershman DL, Neuhouser ML, Arun B, Crew KD, Kukafka R. Use of web-based decision support to improve informed choice for chemoprevention: a qualitative analysis of pre-implementation interviews (SWOG S1904). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:272. [PMID: 39334347 PMCID: PMC11430334 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02691-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with high-risk breast lesions, such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), have a 4- to tenfold increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with non-proliferative breast disease. Despite high-quality data supporting chemoprevention, uptake remains low. Interventions are needed to break down barriers. METHODS The parent trial, MiCHOICE, is a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of patient and provider decision support tools to improve informed choice about chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. For this pre-implementation analysis, 25 providers participated in semi-structured interviews prior to accessing decision support tools. Interviews sought to understand attitudes/beliefs and barriers/facilitators to chemoprevention. RESULTS Interviews with 25 providers (18 physicians and 7 advanced practice providers) were included. Providers were predominantly female (84%), white (72%), and non-Hispanic (88%). Nearly all providers (96%) had prescribed chemoprevention for eligible patients. Three themes emerged in qualitative analysis. The first theme describes providers' confidence in chemoprevention and the utility of decision support tools. The second theme elucidates barriers to chemoprevention, including time constraints, risk communication and perceptions of patients' fear of side effects and anxiety. The third theme is the need for early implementation of decision support tools. CONCLUSIONS This qualitative study suggests that providers were interested in the early inclusion of decision aids (DA) in their chemoprevention discussion workflow. The DAs may help overcome certain barriers which were elucidated in these interviews, including patient level concerns about side effects, clinic time constraints and difficulty communicating risk. A multi-faceted intervention with a DA as one active component may be needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the NIH clinical trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04496739.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa M Michel
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Haeseung Yi
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Amenta
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Nicole Collins
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Anna Vaynrub
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Subiksha Umakanth
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Garnet Anderson
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katie Arnold
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cynthia Law
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Ana Sandoval-Leon
- Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Sarah Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute / University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Stacy Krisher
- Holy Redeemer Hospital and Medical Center, Meadowbrook, PA, USA
| | - Tari King
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Tarah J Ballinger
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Kari Wisinski
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Masey Ross
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Justin Floyd
- Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois, Heartland NCORP, Decatur, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Shelly Lo
- Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Cathy Graham
- Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Yost
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Rita Kukafka
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 6-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arslan M, Asim M, Sattar H, Khan A, Thoppil Ali F, Zehra M, Talluri K. Role of Radiology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer in Women: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e70097. [PMID: 39449897 PMCID: PMC11500669 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Early detection and precise diagnosis are critical for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. This review explores the evolving role of radiology in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, highlighting advancements in imaging technologies and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). Traditional imaging modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging have been the cornerstone of breast cancer diagnostics, with each modality offering unique advantages. The advent of radiomics, which involves extracting quantitative data from medical images, has further augmented the diagnostic capabilities of these modalities. AI, particularly deep learning algorithms, has shown potential in improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing observer variability across imaging modalities. AI-driven tools are increasingly being integrated into clinical workflows to assist in image interpretation, lesion classification, and treatment planning. Additionally, radiology plays a crucial role in guiding treatment decisions, particularly in the context of image-guided radiotherapy and monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The review also discusses the emerging field of theranostics, where diagnostic imaging is combined with therapeutic interventions to provide personalized cancer care. Despite these advancements, challenges such as the need for large annotated datasets and the integration of AI into clinical practice remain. The review concludes that while the role of radiology in breast cancer management is rapidly evolving, further research is required to fully realize the potential of these technologies in improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Asim
- Emergency Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, GBR
| | - Hina Sattar
- Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Anita Khan
- Medicine, Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar, PAK
| | | | - Muneeza Zehra
- Internal Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Keerthi Talluri
- General Medicine, GSL (Ganni Subba Lakshmi garu) Medical College, Rajahmundry, IND
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patra P, Upadhyay TK, Alshammari N, Saeed M, Kesari KK. Alginate-Chitosan Biodegradable and Biocompatible Based Hydrogel for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review. ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS 2024; 7:3515-3534. [PMID: 38787337 PMCID: PMC11190989 DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in females. There are many side effects due to chemotherapy and traditional surgery, like fatigue, loss of appetite, skin irritation, and drug resistance to cancer cells. Immunotherapy has become a hopeful approach toward cancer treatment, generating long-lasting immune responses in malignant tumor patients. Recently, hydrogel has received more attention toward cancer therapy due to its specific characteristics, such as decreased toxicity, fewer side effects, and better biocompatibility drug delivery to the particular tumor location. Researchers globally reported various investigations on hydrogel research for tumor diagnosis. The hydrogel-based multilayer platform with controlled nanostructure has received more attention for its antitumor effect. Chitosan and alginate play a leading role in the formation of the cross-link in a hydrogel. Also, they help in the stability of the hydrogel. This review discusses the properties, preparation, biocompatibility, and bioavailability of various research and clinical approaches of the multipolymer hydrogel made of alginate and chitosan for breast cancer treatment. With a focus on cases of breast cancer and the recovery rate, there is a need to find out the role of hydrogel in drug delivery for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratikshya Patra
- Department
of Biotechnology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences and Animal Cell
Culture and Immunobiochemistry Lab, Research and Development Cell, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat 391760, India
| | - Tarun Kumar Upadhyay
- Department
of Biotechnology, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences and Animal Cell
Culture and Immunobiochemistry Lab, Research and Development Cell, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat 391760, India
| | - Nawaf Alshammari
- Department
of Biology, College of Science, University
of Hail, Hail 53962, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohd Saeed
- Department
of Biology, College of Science, University
of Hail, Hail 53962, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kavindra Kumar Kesari
- Department
of Applied Physics, School of Science, Aalto
University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland
- Centre
of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara
University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pegington M, Zhen Tam H, Brentnall A, Sestak I, Adams J, Blake GM, Gareth Evans D, Howell A, Cuzick J, Harvie M. Body composition changes during breast cancer preventive treatment with anastrozole: Findings from the IBIS-II trial. Prev Med Rep 2024; 38:102620. [PMID: 38375161 PMCID: PMC10874867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Uptake to anastrozole for breast cancer prevention is low, partly due to women's concerns about side effects including gains in weight and specifically gains in body fat. Previous evidence does not link anastrozole with gains in weight, but there is a lack of data on any effects on body composition i.e. changes in fat and fat free mass. Here we assess association of anastrozole with body composition changes in a prospective sub-study from the second international breast intervention trial (IBIS-II). Methods Participants had DXA scans at baseline and for five years of anastrozole/placebo and beyond (between March 2004 and September 2017. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight, body fat and fat free mass at 9-18 months. A linear model was used to estimate the size of a differential effect in these outcomes by randomised treatment allocation adjusted for baseline value and time since last scan, age, 10-year breast cancer risk, smoking and HRT status. Results 203 postmenopausal women were recruited (n = 95 anastrozole, n = 108 placebo), mean age 58 years (SD = 5.4), BMI 28.0 kg/m2 (SD = 5.5). There was no evidence of a strong association between anastrozole or placebo and endpoints at 9-18 months; effect size (95 %CI) for anastrozole minus placebo for body weight (per/kg) -0.11 (-1.29-1.08); body fat 0.11 (-0.75-0.96) and fat free mass -0.30 (-0.79-0.19). Conclusions There is unlikely to be a clinically significant change to body composition with anastrozole for breast cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Pegington
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Hui Zhen Tam
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Ivana Sestak
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Judith Adams
- Centre for Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Glen M. Blake
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NW Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Samimi G, Douglas J, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Ford LG, Szabo E, Minasian LM. Report from an NCI Roundtable: Cancer Prevention in Primary Care. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:273-278. [PMID: 35502552 PMCID: PMC9306398 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The Division of Cancer Prevention in the NCI sponsored a Roundtable with primary care providers (PCP) to determine barriers for integrating cancer prevention within primary care and discuss potential opportunities to overcome these barriers. The goals were to: (i) assess the cancer risk assessment tools available to PCPs; (ii) gather information on use of cancer prevention resources; and (iii) understand the needs of PCPs to facilitate the implementation of cancer prevention interventions beyond routine screening and interventions. The Roundtable discussion focused on challenges and potential research opportunities related to: (i) cancer risk assessment and management of high-risk individuals; (ii) cancer prevention interventions for risk reduction; (iii) electronic health records/electronic medical records; and (iv) patient engagement and information dissemination. Time constraints and inconsistent/evolving clinical guidelines are major barriers to effective implementation of cancer prevention within primary care. Social determinants of health are important factors that influence patients' adoption of recommended preventive interventions. Research is needed to determine the best means for implementation of cancer prevention across various communities and clinical settings. Additional studies are needed to develop tools that can help providers collect clinical data that can enable them to assess patients' cancer risk and implement appropriate preventive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.,Corresponding Author: Goli Samimi, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Phone: 240-276-6582; E-mail:
| | | | | | - Leslie G. Ford
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Eva Szabo
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Lori M. Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affect regulation as a moderator of intentions for breast cancer chemoprevention. J Behav Med 2022; 45:490-496. [PMID: 35113300 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00289-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Women at high risk for breast cancer (BC) may consider chemoprevention for risk reduction, but uptake is low. This study examined the role of affect regulation (the attempt to alter or control one's emotions) in decision-making about BC chemoprevention. A cross-sectional, single group design was used. High-risk women (N = 81) were surveyed. Moderation analyses specified cancer-specific distress as the independent variable, affect regulation (cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression) as the moderator, and chemoprevention intentions (yes = 1, unsure = 0, no = -1) as the dependent variable. Cognitive reappraisal significantly moderated the relationship between cancer-specific distress and chemoprevention intentions (p = 0.03), but expressive suppression did not (p = 0.31). For the 44% of participants who were highest on reappraisal, higher cancer-specific distress was associated with greater intentions for chemoprevention. For the remaining 56%, there was no relationship between cancer-specific distress and chemoprevention intentions. Cognitive reappraisal may play an important role in decisions regarding uptake of chemoprevention.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hjorth CF, Damkier P, Ejlertsen B, Lash T, Sørensen HT, Cronin-Fenton D. Socioeconomic position and prognosis in premenopausal breast cancer: a population-based cohort study in Denmark. BMC Med 2021; 19:235. [PMID: 34587961 PMCID: PMC8482675 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02108-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate how socioeconomic position (SEP) influences the effectiveness of cancer-directed treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients in terms of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. METHODS We conducted a cohort study nested in the ProBeCaRe (Predictors of Breast Cancer Recurrence) cohort (n = 5959). We identified all premenopausal women aged 18-55 years diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer and prescribed docetaxel-based chemotherapy in Denmark during 2007-2011. Population-based administrative registries provided data on SEP: marital status (married including registered partnership or single including divorced or widowed), cohabitation (cohabiting or living alone), education (low, intermediate, or high), income (low, medium, or high), and employment status (employed, unemployed, or health-related absenteeism). For each SEP measure, we computed incidence rates, cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs), and used Poisson regression to compute incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of recurrence and death. We stratified on estrogen receptor (ER) status/tamoxifen to evaluate interaction. RESULTS Our study cohort included 2616 women; 286 (CIP 13%) experienced recurrence and 223 (CIP 11%) died during follow-up (median 6.6 and 7.2 years, respectively). Single women had both increased 5-year risks of recurrence (IRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.89) and mortality (IRR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32-2.52). Furthermore, we observed increased 5-year mortality in women with low education (IRR 1.49, 95% CI 0.95-2.33), low income (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 0.83-2.28), unemployment (IRR 1.61, 95% CI 0.83-3.13), or health-related work absenteeism (IRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.14-2.82), but smaller or no increased risk of recurrence. These findings were especially evident among women with ER+ tumors prescribed tamoxifen. Overall analyses (follow-up max. 10 years) provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS Low SEP in premenopausal women with non-metastatic breast cancer was associated with increased mortality, but not always recurrence. This suggests underdetection of recurrences in certain groups. Poor prognosis in women with low SEP, especially single women, may partly be explained by tamoxifen adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Fonnesbech Hjorth
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Per Damkier
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, J.B. Winsløvs vej 4, Odense University Hospital, 5000, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Winsløwparken 19, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Group, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Rigshospitalet, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Timothy Lash
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Henrik Toft Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Macdonald C, Chamberlain JA, Mazza D, Milne RL, Phillips KA. Underutilisation of breast cancer prevention medication in Australia. Breast 2021; 60:35-37. [PMID: 34455228 PMCID: PMC8399345 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased implementation of proven prevention strategies is required to combat rising breast cancer incidence. We assessed use of risk reducing medication (RRMed) by Australian women at elevated breast cancer risk. Only 2.4% had ever used RRMed. Higher breast cancer risk was statistically significantly associated with use of RRMed (OR 1.82, 95%CI: 1.08–3.07, p = 0.02 for ≥30% lifetime risk compared with 16%–29% lifetime risk), but parity, education level and family history of breast cancer were not. Breast cancer prevention medications are underutilised. Efforts are needed to incorporate breast cancer risk assessment and risk management discussions into routine health assessments for women. Risk-reducing medication is infrequently used by Australian women at increased risk of breast cancer. Higher breast cancer risk is associated with greater uptake of risk reducing medication, but not with adherence. Routine breast cancer risk assessment may increase risk reducing medication use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Macdonald
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| | -
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; The Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evaluation of implementation of risk management guidelines for carriers of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes: a nationwide audit of familial cancer clinics. Fam Cancer 2021; 19:337-346. [PMID: 32385704 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00183-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This nationwide study assessed the impact of Lynch syndrome-related risk management guidelines on clinicians' recommendations of risk management strategies to carriers of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes and the extent to which carriers took up strategies in concordance with guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinic files of 464 carriers (with and without colorectal cancer) were audited for carriers who received their genetic testing results in July 2008-July 2009 (i.e. before guideline release), July 2010-July 2011 and July 2012-July 2013 (both after guideline release) at 12 familial cancer clinics (FCCs) to ascertain the extent to which carriers were informed about risk management in accordance with guidelines. All carriers captured by the audit were invited to participate in interviews; 215 were interviewed to assess adherence to recommended risk management guidelines. RESULTS The rates of documentation in clinic files increased significantly from pre- to post-guideline for only two out of eight risk management strategies. The strategies with the highest compliance of carriers post-guidelines were: uptake of one or two-yearly colonoscopy (87%), followed by hysterectomy to prevent endometrial cancer (68%), aspirin as risk-reducing medication (67%) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (63%). Interrater reliability check for all guidelines showed excellent agreement (k statistics = 0.89). CONCLUSION These results indicate that there is scope to further increase provision of advice at FCCs to ensure that all carriers receive recommendations about evidence-based risk management. A multi-pronged behaviour change and implementation science approach tailored to specific barriers is likely to be needed to achieve optimal clinician behaviours and outcomes for carriers.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bhushan A, Gonsalves A, Menon JU. Current State of Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Theranostics. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:723. [PMID: 34069059 PMCID: PMC8156889 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Early diagnosis and effective treatment of all types of cancers are crucial for a positive prognosis. Patients with small tumor sizes at the time of their diagnosis have a significantly higher survival rate and a significantly reduced probability of the cancer being fatal. Therefore, many novel technologies are being developed for early detection of primary tumors, as well as distant metastases and recurrent disease, for effective breast cancer management. Theranostics has emerged as a new paradigm for the simultaneous diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of cancers. It has the potential to provide timely and improved patient care via personalized therapy. In nanotheranostics, cell-specific targeting moieties, imaging agents, and therapeutic agents can be embedded within a single formulation for effective treatment. In this review, we will highlight the different diagnosis techniques and treatment strategies for breast cancer management and explore recent advances in breast cancer theranostics. Our main focus will be to summarize recent trends and technologies in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment as reported in recent research papers and patents and discuss future perspectives for effective breast cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Bhushan
- Ladue Horton Watkins High School, St. Louis, MO 63124, USA;
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA;
| | - Andrea Gonsalves
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA;
| | - Jyothi U. Menon
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Padamsee TJ, Hils M, Muraveva A. Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21:157. [PMID: 33863327 PMCID: PMC8052843 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01279-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoprevention is one of several methods that have been developed to help high-risk women reduce their risk of breast cancer. Reasons for the low uptake of chemoprevention are poorly understood. This paper seeks a deeper understanding of this phenomenon by drawing on women's own narratives about their awareness of chemoprevention and their risk-related experiences. METHODS This research is based on a parent project that included fifty in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of African American and White women at elevated risk of breast cancer. This specific study draws on the forty-seven interviews conducted with women at high or severe risk of breast cancer, all of whom are eligible to use chemoprevention for breast cancer risk-reduction. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory methods. RESULTS Forty-five percent of participants, and only 21% of African American participants, were aware of chemoprevention options. Women who had seen specialists were more likely to be aware, particularly if they had ongoing specialist access. Aware and unaware women relied on different types of sources for prevention-related information. Those whose main source of information was a healthcare provider were more likely to know about chemoprevention. Aware women used more nuanced information gathering strategies and worried more about cancer. Women simultaneously considered all risk-reduction options they knew about. Those who knew about chemoprevention but were reluctant to use it felt this way for multiple reasons, having to do with potential side effects, perceived extreme-ness of the intervention, similarity to chemotherapy, unknown information about chemoprevention, and reluctance to take medications in general. CONCLUSIONS Lack of chemoprevention awareness is a critical gap in women's ability to make health-protective choices. Future research in this field must consider complexities in both women's perspectives on chemoprevention and the reasons they are reluctant to use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J. Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Megan Hils
- Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio, Worthington, OH USA
| | - Anna Muraveva
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Macdonald C, Saunders CM, Keogh LA, Hunter M, Mazza D, McLachlan SA, Jones SC, Nesci S, Friedlander ML, Hopper JL, Emery JD, Hickey M, Milne RL, Phillips KA. Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Use and Views of Australian Women and Their Clinicians. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 14:131-144. [PMID: 33115784 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines endorse the use of chemoprevention for breast cancer risk reduction. This study examined the barriers and facilitators to chemoprevention use for Australian women at increased risk of breast cancer, and their clinicians. Surveys, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, were mailed to 1,113 women at ≥16% lifetime risk of breast cancer who were enrolled in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer cohort study (kConFab), and their 524 treating clinicians. Seven hundred twenty-five women (65%) and 221 (42%) clinicians responded. Only 10 (1.4%) kConFab women had ever taken chemoprevention. Three hundred seventy-eight (52%) kConFab women, two (3%) breast surgeons, and 51 (35%) family physicians were not aware of chemoprevention. For women, the strongest barriers to chemoprevention were side effects (31%) and inadequate information (23%), which operate in the Theoretical Domains Framework domains of "beliefs about consequences" and "knowledge," respectively. Strongest facilitators related to tamoxifen's long-term efficacy (35%, "knowledge," "beliefs about consequences," and "goals" domains), staying healthy for family (13%, "social role" and "goals" domains), and abnormal breast biopsy (13%, "environmental context" domain). The strongest barrier for family physicians was insufficient knowledge (45%, "knowledge" domain) and for breast surgeons was medication side effects (40%, "beliefs about consequences" domain). The strongest facilitators for both clinician groups related to clear guidelines, strong family history, and better tools to select patients ("environmental context and resources" domain). Clinician knowledge and resources, and beliefs about the side-effect consequences of chemoprevention, are key domains that could be targeted to potentially enhance uptake. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Despite its efficacy in reducing breast cancer incidence, chemoprevention is underutilised. This survey study of Australian women and their clinicians used behavioural change theory to identify modifiable barriers to chemoprevention uptake, and to suggest interventions such as policy change, educational resources and public campaigns, that may increase awareness and use.See related Spotlight by Vogel, p. 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Macdonald
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Louise A Keogh
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Morgan Hunter
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Danielle Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue-Anne McLachlan
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra C Jones
- ACU Engagement, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Nesci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne and the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forrest LE, Forbes Shepherd R, Young MA, Keogh LA, James PA. Finding the five-year window: A qualitative study examining young women's decision-making and experience of using tamoxifen to reduce BRCA1/2 breast cancer risk. Psychooncology 2020; 30:159-166. [PMID: 33006205 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tamoxifen has been demonstrated to reduce breast cancer risk in high-risk, premenopausal women. Yet, very few young women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Australia use tamoxifen, despite this being a less-invasive option compared to risk-reducing mastectomy. This study aims to examine young women's decision-making about and experience of taking tamoxifen to reduce their breast cancer risk. METHODS Young women with a BRCA1/2 mutation participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, recruited mainly from a metropolitan clinical genetics service. Data were analysed using an inductive, team-based approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS Forty interviews with women aged 20-40 years with a BRCA1/2 mutation were conducted. Eleven women could not recall discussing tamoxifen with their healthcare provider or were too young to commence cancer risk management. Twenty-three women chose not to use tamoxifen because it is contraindicated for pregnancy or because it did not offer immediate and great enough risk reduction compared to bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Six women who were definite about not wanting to have children during the following 5-year period chose to use tamoxifen, and most experienced none or transient side effects. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making about tamoxifen was nuanced and informed by considerations characteristic of young adulthood, especially childbearing. Therefore, clinical discussions about tamoxifen with young women with a BRCA1/2 mutation must include consideration of their reproductive plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rowan Forbes Shepherd
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee B, Jung EA, Yoo JJ, Kim SG, Lee CB, Kim YS, Jeong SW, Jang JY, Lee SH, Kim HS, Jun BG, Kim YD, Cheon GJ. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of tamoxifen-related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int 2020; 40:1344-1355. [PMID: 32170895 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Tamoxifen is associated with an increased risk of developing fatty liver. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of fatty liver developed after tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, OVID Medline, the Cochrane Library and other databases was performed for this review. The abstracts obtained from the search were reviewed by two investigators who chose manuscripts for full-text review. The event rates were calculated with a random-effects model and quality-effects model. RESULTS The search yielded 165 references. Of these, 24 were included in the quantitative summary. We analysed the data of a total of 6,962 patients treated with tamoxifen and 975 patients not treated with tamoxifen. The prevalence of fatty liver among patients with breast cancer taking tamoxifen was 40.25 per 100 patients and the incidence rate was 12.37 per 100 person-years. The incidence of fatty liver was much higher in the tamoxifen group than in the control group [incidence rate ratio: 3.12, 95% CI (confidence interval): 2.05-4.75, I2 = 61%], regardless of region. The main risk factors were body mass index (BMI) [hazard ratio (HR): 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22] and hypercholesterolaemia (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02). CONCLUSION The use of tamoxifen was associated with increased risks in the incidence and prevalence of fatty liver, especially in patients with high BMI and hypercholesterolaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bora Lee
- Department of Statistics, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Ae Jung
- Medical Library, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Ju Yoo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Sang Gyune Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Cheon-Beom Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Soung Won Jeong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Young Jang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Hwan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Hong Soo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Baek Gyu Jun
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung-si, Korea
| | - Young Don Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung-si, Korea
| | - Gab Jin Cheon
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung-si, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sebaoun P, Frederic M, Weryha G, Hamdaoui SE, Salleron J, Lesur A. Tolérance du Tamoxifène en traitement adjuvant et devenir lointain de 55 femmes non ménopausées suivies à l’Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, pour un cancer du sein. Bull Cancer 2019; 106:S75-S100. [DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(20)30050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
16
|
Guo WY, Zeng SMZ, Deora GS, Li QS, Ruan BF. Estrogen Receptor α (ERα)-targeting Compounds and Derivatives: Recent Advances in Structural Modification and Bioactivity. Curr Top Med Chem 2019; 19:1318-1337. [PMID: 31215379 DOI: 10.2174/1568026619666190619142504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer suffered by female, and the second highest cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. At present, hormone therapy is still the main treatment route and can be divided into three main categories: selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). However, breast cancer is difficult to cure even after several rounds of anti-estrogen therapy and most drugs have serious side-effects. Here, we review the literature published over the past five years regarding the isolation and synthesis of analogs and their derivatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Yun Guo
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Shang-Ming-Zhu Zeng
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Girdhar Singh Deora
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Qing-Shan Li
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Ban-Feng Ruan
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nelson HD, Fu R, Zakher B, Pappas M, McDonagh M. Medication Use for the Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2019; 322:868-886. [PMID: 31479143 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.5780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Medications to reduce risk of breast cancer are effective for women at increased risk but also cause adverse effects. OBJECTIVE To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force systematic review on medications to reduce risk of primary (first diagnosis) invasive breast cancer in women. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (January 1, 2013, to February 1, 2019); manual review of reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Discriminatory accuracy studies of breast cancer risk assessment methods; randomized clinical trials of tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors for primary breast cancer prevention; studies of medication adverse effects. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Investigators abstracted data on methods, participant characteristics, eligibility criteria, outcome ascertainment, and follow-up. Results of individual trials were combined by using a profile likelihood random-effects model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Probability of breast cancer in individuals (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]); incidence of breast cancer, fractures, thromboembolic events, coronary heart disease events, stroke, endometrial cancer, and cataracts; and mortality. RESULTS A total of 46 studies (82 articles [>5 million participants]) were included. Eighteen risk assessment methods in 25 studies reported low accuracy in predicting the probability of breast cancer in individuals (AUC, 0.55-0.65). In placebo-controlled trials, tamoxifen (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]; 4 trials [n = 28 421]), raloxifene (RR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24-0.80]; 2 trials [n = 17 806]), and the aromatase inhibitors exemestane and anastrozole (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.70]; 2 trials [n = 8424]) were associated with a lower incidence of invasive breast cancer. Risk for invasive breast cancer was higher for raloxifene than tamoxifen in 1 trial after long-term follow-up (RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.05-1.47]; n = 19 747). Raloxifene was associated with lower risk for vertebral fractures (RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.53-0.73]; 2 trials [n = 16 929]) and tamoxifen was associated with lower risk for nonvertebral fractures (RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.98]; 1 trial [n = 13 388]) compared with placebo. Tamoxifen and raloxifene were associated with increased thromboembolic events compared with placebo; tamoxifen was associated with more events than raloxifene. Tamoxifen was associated with higher risk of endometrial cancer and cataracts compared with placebo. Symptomatic effects (eg, vasomotor, musculoskeletal) varied by medication. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors were associated with lower risk of primary invasive breast cancer in women but also were associated with adverse effects that differed between medications. Risk stratification methods to identify patients with increased breast cancer risk demonstrated low accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Nelson
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Rongwei Fu
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Bernadette Zakher
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Miranda Pappas
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Marian McDonagh
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kehm RD, Hopper JL, John EM, Phillips KA, MacInnis RJ, Dite GS, Milne RL, Liao Y, Zeinomar N, Knight JA, Southey MC, Vahdat L, Kornhauser N, Cigler T, Chung WK, Giles GG, McLachlan SA, Friedlander ML, Weideman PC, Glendon G, Nesci S, Andrulis IL, Buys SS, Daly MB, Terry MB. Regular use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk for women at familial or genetic risk: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21:52. [PMID: 30999962 PMCID: PMC6471793 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1135-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been associated with reduced breast cancer risk, but it is not known if this association extends to women at familial or genetic risk. We examined the association between regular NSAID use and breast cancer risk using a large cohort of women selected for breast cancer family history, including 1054 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Methods We analyzed a prospective cohort (N = 5606) and a larger combined, retrospective and prospective, cohort (N = 8233) of women who were aged 18 to 79 years, enrolled before June 30, 2011, with follow-up questionnaire data on medication history. The prospective cohort was further restricted to women without breast cancer when medication history was asked by questionnaire. Women were recruited from seven study centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Associations were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographics, lifestyle factors, family history, and other medication use. Women were classified as regular or non-regular users of aspirin, COX-2 inhibitors, ibuprofen and other NSAIDs, and acetaminophen (control) based on self-report at follow-up of ever using the medication for at least twice a week for ≥1 month prior to breast cancer diagnosis. The main outcome was incident invasive breast cancer, based on self- or relative-report (81% confirmed pathologically). Results From fully adjusted analyses, regular aspirin use was associated with a 39% and 37% reduced risk of breast cancer in the prospective (HR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.33–1.14) and combined cohorts (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.57–0.71), respectively. Regular use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with a 61% and 71% reduced risk of breast cancer (prospective HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.15–0.97; combined HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.23–0.38). Other NSAIDs and acetaminophen were not associated with breast cancer risk in either cohort. Associations were not modified by familial risk, and consistent patterns were found by BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier status, estrogen receptor status, and attained age. Conclusion Regular use of aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors might reduce breast cancer risk for women at familial or genetic risk. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1135-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca D Kehm
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, 780 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Yuyan Liao
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Nur Zeinomar
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Julia A Knight
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T3M7, Canada
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Linda Vahdat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.,C Anthony and Jean Whittingham Cancer Center, 34 Maple Street, Norwalk, CT, 06856, USA
| | - Naomi Kornhauser
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tessa Cigler
- Weill Cornell Medicine Breast Center, 428 E 72nd St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, 1150 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Sue-Anne McLachlan
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria St, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker St, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Prue C Weideman
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Gord Glendon
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Stephanie Nesci
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | | | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.,Departments of Molecular Genetics and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G9, Canada
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, 2000 Cir of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, USA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. .,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rainey L, Jervaeus A, Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Hammarström M, Hall P, Wengström Y, Broeders MJM, van der Waal D. Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1056-1062. [PMID: 30848018 PMCID: PMC6593462 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective Increased knowledge of breast cancer risk factors enables a shift from one‐size‐fits‐all breast cancer screening to a risk‐based approach, tailoring screening policy to a woman's individual risk. New opportunities for prevention will arise. However, before this novel screening and prevention program is introduced, its acceptability from a woman's perspective needs to be explored. Methods Women eligible for breast cancer screening in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Sweden were invited to take part in focus groups. A total of 143 women participated. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Analysis identified five themes across the three countries. The first theme “impact of knowledge” describes women's concern of not being able to unlearn their risk, perceiving it as either a motivator for change or a burden which may lead to stigma. The second theme “belief in science” explains women's need to trust the science behind the risk assessment and subsequent care pathways. Theme three “emotional impact” explores, eg, women's perceived anxiety and (false) reassurance, which may result from knowing their risk. Theme four “decision making” highlights cultural differences in shared versus individual decision making. Theme five “attitude to medication” explores the controversial topic of offering preventative medication for breast cancer risk reduction. Conclusions Acceptability of risk‐based screening and prevention is mixed. Women's perceptions are informed by a lack of knowledge, cultural norms, and common emotional concerns, which highlights the importance of tailored educational materials and risk counselling to aid either shared or individual informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Anna Jervaeus
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge
| | - Louise S Donnelly
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester.,Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
| | - Mattias Hammarström
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge.,Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university Medical Center, Nijmegen.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:134. [PMID: 30558581 PMCID: PMC6296071 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer chemoprevention can reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women; however, chemoprevention is underutilized in the primary care setting. We conducted a pilot study of decision support tools among high-risk women and their primary care providers (PCPs). Methods The intervention included a decision aid (DA) for high-risk women, RealRisks, and a provider-centered tool, Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV). Patients completed validated surveys at baseline, after RealRisks and after their PCP clinical encounter or at 6-months. Referral for high-risk consultation and chemoprevention uptake were assessed via the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was accuracy of breast cancer risk perception at 6-months. Results Among 40 evaluable high-risk women, median age was 64.5 years and median 5-year breast cancer risk was 2.19%. After exposure to RealRisks, patients demonstrated an improvement in accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (p = 0.02), an increase in chemoprevention knowledge (p < 0.01), and 24% expressed interest in taking chemoprevention. Three women had a high-risk referral, and no one initiated chemoprevention. Decisional conflict significantly increased from after exposure to RealRisks to after their clinical encounter or at 6-months (p < 0.01). Accurate breast cancer risk perceptions improved and was sustained at 6-months or after clinical encounters. We discuss the side effect profile of chemoprevention and the care pathway when RealRisks was introduced to understand why patients experienced increased decision conflict. Conclusion Future interventions should carefully link the use of a DA more proximally to the clinical encounter, investigate timed measurements of decision conflict and improve risk communication, shared decision making, and chemoprevention education for PCPs. Additional work remains to better understand the impact of decision aids targeting both patients and providers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02954900 November 4, 2016 Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|