Prognosis of patients excluded by the definition of septic shock based on their lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation: a prospective multi-center observational study

Development of a prehospital lactic acidosis score for early-mortality. A prospective, multicenter, ambulance-based, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lactic acidosis is a clinical status related to clinical worsening. Actually, higher levels of lactate is a well-established trigger of emergency situations. The aim of this work is to build-up a prehospital early warning score to predict 2-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, constructed with other components of the lactic acidosis besides the lactate.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, observational, derivation-validation cohort study of adults evacuated by ambulance and admitted to emergency department with acute diseases, between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2021. Including six advanced life support, thirty-eight basic life support units, referring to four hospitals (Spain). The primary and secondary outcome of the study were 2-day all-cause mortality and ICU-admission. The prehospital lactic acidosis (PLA) score was derived from the analysis of prehospital blood parameters associated with the outcome using a logistic regression. The calibration, clinical utility, and discrimination of PLA were determined and compared to the performance of each component of the score alone.

RESULTS

A total of 3334 patients were enrolled. The final PLA score included: lactate, pCO2, and pH. For 2-day mortality, the PLA showed an AUC of 0.941 (95%CI: 0.914-0.967), a better performance in calibration, and a higher net benefit as compared to the other score components alone. For the ICU admission, the PLA only showed a better performance for AUC: 0.75 (95%CI: 0.706-0.794).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that PLA predicts 2-day mortality better than other lactic acidosis components alone. Including PLA score in prehospital setting could improve emergency services decision-making.

Development of a Nomogram for Predicting Mortality Risk in Sepsis Patients During Hospitalization: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

We attempted to establish a model for predicting the mortality risk of sepsis patients during hospitalization.

Patients and Methods

Data on patients with sepsis were collected from a clinical record mining database, who were hospitalized at the Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between January 2013 and August 2022. These included patients were divided into modeling and validation groups. In the modeling group, the independent risk factors of death during hospitalization were determined using univariate and multi-variate regression analyses. After stepwise regression analysis (both directions), a nomogram was drawn. The discrimination ability of the model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the GiViTI calibration chart assessed the model calibration. The Decline Curve Analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the prediction model. Among the validation group, the logistic regression model was compared to the models established by the SOFA scoring system, random forest method, and stacking method.

Results

A total of 1740 subjects were included in this study, 1218 in the modeling population and 522 in the validation population. The results revealed that serum cholinesterase, total bilirubin, respiratory failure, lactic acid, creatinine, and pro-brain natriuretic peptide were the independent risk factors of death. The AUC values in the modeling group and validation group were 0.847 and 0.826. The P values of calibration charts in the two population sets were 0.838 and 0.771. The DCA curves were above the two extreme curves. Moreover, the AUC values of the models established by the SOFA scoring system, random forest method, and stacking method in the validation group were 0.777, 0.827, and 0.832, respectively.

Conclusion

The nomogram model established by combining multiple risk factors could effectively predict the mortality risk of sepsis patients during hospitalization.

Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation

BACKGROUND

The Sepsis-3 criteria introduced the system that uses the Sequential Organ-Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to define sepsis. The cardiovascular SOFA (CV SOFA) scoring system needs modification due to the change in guideline-recommended vasopressors. In this study, we aimed to develop and to validate the modified CV SOFA score.

METHODS

We developed, internally validated, and externally validated the modified CV SOFA score using the suspected infection cohort, sepsis cohort, and septic shock cohort. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The modified CV SOFA score system was constructed with consideration of the recently recommended use of the vasopressor norepinephrine with or without lactate level. The predictive validity of the modified SOFA score was evaluated by the discrimination for the primary outcome. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed using the calibration curve. We compared the prognostic performance of the original CV/total SOFA score and the modified CV/total SOFA score to detect mortality in patients with suspected infection, sepsis, or septic shock.

RESULTS

We identified 7,393 patients in the suspected cohort, 4038 patients in the sepsis cohort, and 3,107 patients in the septic shock cohort in seven Korean emergency departments (EDs). The 28-day mortality rates were 7.9%, 21.4%, and 20.5%, respectively, in the suspected infection, sepsis, and septic shock cohorts. The model performance is higher when vasopressor and lactate were used in combination than the vasopressor only used model. The modified CV/total SOFA score was well-developed and internally and externally validated in terms of discrimination and calibration. Predictive validity of the modified CV SOFA was significantly higher than that of the original CV SOFA in the development set (0.682 vs 0.624, p < 0.001), test set (0.716 vs 0.638), and all other cohorts (0.648 vs 0.557, 0.674 vs 0.589). Calibration was modest. In the suspected infection cohort, the modified model classified more patients to sepsis (66.0 vs 62.5%) and identified more patients at risk of septic mortality than the SOFA score (92.6 vs 89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among ED patients with suspected infection, sepsis, and septic shock, the newly-developed modified CV/total SOFA score had higher predictive validity and identified more patients at risk of septic mortality.

Prognostic factors for late death in septic shock survivors: a multi-center, prospective, registry-based observational study

Septic shock patients who survive past the acute period are associated with an increased risk of long-term mortality. However, factors for predicting late death remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors associated with late mortality in septic shock patients with 28-day survival after admission. This retrospective observational study used a prospective, multi-center registry of septic shock patients between October 2015 and December 2019 involving 12 emergency departments (EDs) from the Korean Shock Society. Adult septic shock patients visiting the ED with 28-day survival after admission were included. Among 4624 septic shock patients, 3588 (77.6%) who survived past day 28 were analyzed. The 90-day mortality rate was 14.2%. Non-survivors were older (66.8 vs. 68.9 years; p = 0.032) and had higher lactate levels (3.7 vs. 4.0 mmol/L; p = 0.028) than survivors. Pulmonary and hepatobiliary infections and a history of malignancy (27.7 vs. 57.5%; p < 0.001) were more frequent in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. Independent risk factors for late death on multivariate regression analysis were age; malignancy; and hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and albumin levels. The length of intensive care unit stay and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independently associated with late death. Approximately, one-seventh of septic shock patients who survived past day 28 of admission died by day 90. Physicians must pay attention to survivors with these risk factors during the post-acute period as they have an increased mortality risk.

Prognosis and Risk Factors of Sepsis Patients in Chinese ICUs: A Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort Database

BACKGROUND

Sepsis-3 proposed a new definition of septic shock that excluded patients without hyperlactacidemia. The data from China might help to elucidate the prognosis of this special patient group.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical prognosis and factors affecting patients with sepsis based on data from Chinese intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicentre observational study in a larger Chinese cohort from January 1, 2014 to August 31, 2015. The patients were divided into four groups according to the presence or absence of hypotension/vasopressor delivery and hyperlactacidemia after fluid resuscitation. Descriptive statistics for the clinical characteristics were presented. The differences between groups were assessed. A survival curve was then plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Finally, to better understand the risk factors for the 28-day hospital mortality rates, Cox regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,194 patients with sepsis were included: 282 with hypotension and hyperlactacidemia, 250 with hypotension but without hyperlactacidemia, 161 with hyperlactacidemia but without hypotension, and 501 without hypotension and hyperlactacidemia. The 28-day mortality rates of the four groups were 48.2%, 43.2%, 26.1%, and 24.8%, respectively. Age, the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, hyperlactacidemia, hypotension, intra-abdominal infection, and cancer increased the risk of the 28-day mortality, while soft tissue infection and coming from the operating room were associated with a decreased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hypotension but without hyperlactacidemia in the ICU also show a high 28-day mortality, and some clinical factors may affect their prognosis and must be treated carefully in the future.

Pulse pressure during the initial resuscitative period in patients with septic shock treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Maintaining a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg during septic shock should be based on individual circumstances, but specific target is poorly understood. We investigated associations between time-weighted average (TWA) hemodynamic parameters during the initial resuscitative period and 28-day mortality.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were obtained from a septic shock patient registry, according to the Sepsis-3 definition, between 2016 and 2018. The TWA systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, MAP, shock index, and pulse pressure (PP) during the first 6 hours after shock recognition were compared. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess associations between these parameters and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 340 patients with septic shock, 92 died. Only the median TWA PP differed between the survivors and non-survivors (39.2 mmHg vs. 43.0 mmHg, p = 0.020), whereas the other indexes did not. When PP was divided into quartiles (< 34, 34 to 40, 40 to 48, and > 48 mmHg), the mortality rate was higher in the highest quartile (41.2%). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that PP (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.012 to 1.622; p = 0.039) and PP of > 48 mmHg (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.272 to 3.981; p = 0.005) were independently associated with 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

PP was significantly associated with 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock and MAP maintained at > 65 mmHg during the first 6 hours. Further studies are warranted to optimize strategies for maintaining PP and MAP at > 65 mmHg during the early resuscitative period.

Time for a prehospital-modified sequential organ failure assessment score: An ambulance-Based cohort study

BACKGROUND

To adapt the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to fit the prehospital care needs; to do that, the SOFA was modified by replacing platelets and bilirubin, by lactate, and tested this modified SOFA (mSOFA) score in its prognostic capacity to assess the mortality-risk at 2 days since the first Emergency Medical Service (EMS) contact.

METHODS

Prospective, multicentric, EMS-delivery, ambulance-based, pragmatic cohort study of adults with acute diseases, referred to two tertiary care hospitals (Spain), between January 1st and December 31st, 2020. The discriminative power of the predictive variable was assessed through a prediction model trained using the derivation cohort and evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) on the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 1114 participants comprised two separated cohorts recruited from 15 ambulance stations. The 2-day mortality rate (from any cause) was 5.9% (66 cases). The predictive validity of the mSOFA score was assessed by the calculation of the AUC of ROC in the validation cohort, resulting in an AUC of 0.946 (95% CI, 0.913-0.978, p < .001), with a positive likelihood ratio was 23.3 (95% CI, 0.32-46.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Scoring systems are now a reality in prehospital care, and the mSOFA score assesses multiorgan dysfunction in a simple and agile manner either bedside or en route. Patients with acute disease and an mSOFA score greater than 6 points transferred with high priority by EMS represent a high early mortality group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN48326533, Registered Octuber 312,019, Prospectively registered (doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN48326533).

Independent Risk Factors for Sepsis-Associated Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Septic Shock

The clinical characteristics and laboratory values of patients with septic shock who experience in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of IHCA after admission into the emergency department and to identify the factors that increase the risk of IHCA in septic shock patients. This observational cohort study used a prospective registry of septic shock patients and was conducted at the emergency department of a university-affiliated hospital. The data of 887 adult (age ≥ 18 years) septic shock (defined using the Sepsis-3 criteria) patients who were treated with a protocol-driven resuscitation bundle therapy and were admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2010 and September 2018 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of sepsis-associated cardiac arrest. The patient mean age was 65 years, and 61.8% were men. Sepsis-associated cardiac arrest occurred in 25.3% of patients (n = 224). The 28-day survival rate after cardiac arrest was 6.7%. Multivariate logistic regression identified chronic pulmonary disease (odds ratio (OR) 2.06), hypertension (OR 0.48), unknown infection source (OR 1.82), a hepatobiliary infection source (OR 0.25), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03), and serum lactate level 6 h from shock (OR 1.34). Considering the high mortality rate of sepsis-associated cardiac arrest after cardiopulmonary resuscitation, appropriate monitoring is required in septic shock patients with major risk factors for IHCA.

Impact of 1-Hour Bundle Achievement in Septic Shock

This study aimed to address the impact of 1-hr bundle achievement on outcomes in septic shock patients. Secondary analysis of multicenter prospectively collected data on septic shock patients who had undergone protocolized resuscitation bundle therapy at emergency departments was conducted. In-hospital mortality according to 1-h bundle achievement was compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients were also divided into 3 groups according to the time of bundle achievement and outcomes were compared to examine the difference in outcome for each group over time: group 1 (≤1 h reference), group 2 (1–3 h) and group 3 (3–6 h). In total, 1612 patients with septic shock were included. The 1-h bundle was achieved in 461 (28.6%) patients. The group that achieved the 1-h bundle did not show a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the 1-h bundle on multivariable logistic regression analysis (<1 vs. >1 h) (odds ratio = 0.74, p = 0.091). However, 3- and 6- h bundle achievements showed significantly lower odds ratios of in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the bundle (<3 vs. >3 h, <6 vs. >6 h, odds ratio = 0.604 and 0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality over time for group 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1. One-hour bundle achievement was not associated with improved outcomes in septic shock patients. These data suggest that further investigation into the clinical implications of 1-h bundle achievement in patients with septic shock is warranted.

Accuracy of prehospital point-of-care lactate in early in-hospital mortality

BACKGROUND

Emergency medical services (EMS) routinely face complex scenarios where decisions should be taken with limited clinical information. The development of fast, reliable and easy to perform warning biomarkers could help in such decision-making processes. The present study aims at characterizing the validity of point-of-care lactate (pLA) during prehospital tasks for predicting in-hospital mortality within two days after the EMS assistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective, multicentric, ambulance-based and controlled observational study without intervention, including six advanced life support and five hospitals. The pLA levels were recorded during EMS assistance of adult patients. The validity of pLA to determine the in-hospital mortality was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve (ROC).

RESULTS

A total of 2997 patients were considered in the study, with a median of 69 years (IQR 54-81) and 41.4% of women. The median pLA value was 2.7 mmol/L (1.9-3.8) in survivors and 5.7 mmol/L (4.4-7.6) in nonsurvivors. The global discrimination level of pLA reached an AUC of 0.867, being 1.9 mmol/L and 4 mmol/L the cut-off point for low and high mortality. The discrimination value of pLA was not affected by sex, age or pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the clinical importance of prehospital pLA to determine the in-hospital risk of mortality. The incorporation of pLA into the EMS protocols could improve the early identification of risky patients, leading to a better care of such patients.

Physician and Nurse Research in Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Although clinical care is multidisciplinary, intensive care unit research commonly focuses on single-discipline themes. We sought to characterize intensive care unit research conducted by physicians and nurses.

METHODS

One hundred randomly selected reports of clinical studies published in critical care medical and nursing journals were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 100 articles reviewed, 50 were published in medical journals and 50 were published in nursing journals. Only 1 medical study (2%) used qualitative methods, compared with 9 nursing studies (18%) (P = .02). The distribution of quantitative study designs differed between medical and nursing journals (P < .001), with medical journals having a predominance of cohort studies (29 articles [58%]). Compared with medical journal articles, nursing journal articles had significantly fewer authors (median [interquartile range], 5 [3-6] vs 8 [6-10]; P < .001) and study participants (94 [51-237] vs 375 [86-4183]; P < .001) and a significantly lower proportion of male study participants (55% [26%-65%] vs 60% [51%-65%]; P = .02). Studies published in medical journals were much more likely than those published in nursing journals to exclusively involve patients as participants (47 [94%] vs 25 [50%]; P < .001). Coauthorship between physicians and nurses was evident in 14 articles (14%), with infrequent inclusion of authors from other health care disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician research and nurse research differ in several important aspects and tend to occur within silos. Increased interprofessional collaboration is possible and worthwhile.

Diagnostic accuracy of lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation as a predictor for 28 day mortality in septic shock

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of initial and post-fluid resuscitation lactate levels in predicting 28 day mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multi-center registry of suspected septic shock cases that was prospectively collected between October 2015 and December 2018 from 11 Emergency Departments. The primary outcome was 28 day mortality. The diagnostic performance of the initial and post-fluid resuscitation lactate levels as a predictor for 28 day mortality was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 2568 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall 28 day mortality rate was 23%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of initial lactate for predicting 28 day mortality was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.64-0.69) and that of after fluid administration lactate was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72), and there was a significant difference (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff point of lactate after fluid administration was 4.4 mmol/L. Compared with this, the Sepsis-3 definition with a lactate level of 2 mmol/L or more was relatively more sensitive and less specific for predicting 28 day mortality.

CONCLUSION

The post-fluid resuscitation lactate level was more accurate than the initial lactate level in predicting 28 day mortality in patients with suspected septic shock.

A mortality analysis of septic shock, vasoplegic shock and cryptic shock classified by the third international consensus definitions (Sepsis-3)

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the 28-day mortality of patients with septic shock, defined by Sepsis-3 criteria and patients with vasoplegic or cryptic shock who are excluded from this new definition.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective observational study was performed using a tertiary emergency department's septic shock registry and investigated the records of patients managed between January 2010 and December 2015. In 2,138 total patients, 1004 (47.0%) had septic shock, 476 (22.2%) had vasoplegic shock and 655 (30.6%) had cryptic shock.

RESULTS

There was significant variation in 28-day mortality among the three groups: 23.4% for septic shock, 8.8% for vasoplegic shock and 12.2% for cryptic shock (P < .001). In subgroup analysis of cryptic shock or septic shock according to lactate levels (2-3, 3-4 and >4 mmol/L), the mortality rate increased as lactate increased (cryptic shock: 9.5%, 14.8% and 18.0%; septic shock: 18.6%, 22.6% and 27.0%, respectively; P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed odds ratios for mortality of 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.44; P < .001) for vasoplegic shock and 0.46 (95% CI 0.35-0.61; P < .001) for cryptic shock relative to septic shock. Survival curve analysis showed significant differences among patients with septic shock, vasoplegic shock and cryptic shock (Log rank test: P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The new septic shock definition may be useful for identifying high-risk patients requiring intensive care. However, cryptic shock-associated mortality increased to 18.0% as serum lactate increased, which suggests that some cryptic shock patients may also require intensive management.

Comparison of cardiac output, IVC diameters and lactate levels in prediction of mortality in patients in emergency department; An observational study

Objective:

Fluid overload is an independent marker for mortality in critically ill patients. Assessment of fluid status and fluid responsiveness is crucial for the management of these patients. In this study, we compared the lactate level, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and non-invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring in prediction of mortality in emergency department.

Methods:

This was a cross sectional observational study which comprised of 68 patients and was performed in ED of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from Sept 2016 until Sept 2017. IVC diameter was measured before the P-wave on ECG to avoid interference with a-wave and v-wave on the venous pressure curve, and during maximal inspiration and expiration to avoid Valsalva-like maneuvers. An arterial lactate sample was taken from all patients before performing the initial resuscitation. All patients underwent non-invasive CO monitoring by CO₂ rebreathing technique. Mortality was noted on day 28.

Results:

Deceased patients had a significantly low level of IVC diameters, less CO values and more lactate levels. However, based on ROC curve analysis, the prediction accuracy and validity of both CO values obtained by rebreathing CO₂ and IVC diameter was poor and the highest accuracy was obtained by lactate level assessment.

Conclusion:

Initial lactate value is a reliable parameter for prediction of mortality in non-traumatic critically ill patients. IVC diameter changes during spontaneous ventilation and non-invasive CO monitoring does not possess acceptable accuracy for prediction of mortality in these patients.

Time to Antibiotics and the Outcome of Patients with Septic Shock: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current sepsis guidelines recommend administration of antibiotics within 1 hour of emergency department (ED) triage. However, the quality of the supporting evidence is moderate, and studies have shown mixed results regarding the association between antibiotic administration timing and outcomes in septic shock. We investigated to evaluate the association between antibiotic administration timing and in-hospital mortality in septic shock patients in the ED, using propensity score analysis.

METHODS

An observational study using a prospective, multicenter registry of septic shock, comprising data collected from 10 EDs, was conducted. Septic shock patients were included, and patients were divided into 4 groups by the interval from triage to first antibiotic administration: group 1 (≤1 hour; reference), 2 (1-2 hours), 3 (2-3 hours), and 4 (>3 hours). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the outcomes of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 2250 septic shock patients were included, and the median time to first antibiotic administration was 2.29 hours. The in-hospital mortality of groups 2 and 4 were significantly higher than those of group 1 (odds ratio [OR] 1.248; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.053-1.478; P = .011; OR 1.419; 95% CI, 1.203-1.675; P < .001, respectively), but those of group 3 was not (OR 1.186; 95% CI, 0.999-1.408; P = .052). Subgroup analyses of patients (n = 2043) with appropriate antibiotics presented similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with septic shock, rapid administration of antibiotics was generally associated with a decrease in in-hospital mortality, but no "every hour delay" was seen.

Early Vitamin C and Thiamine Administration to Patients with Septic Shock in Emergency Departments: Propensity Score-Based Analysis of a Before-and-After Cohort Study

Background: Intravenous vitamin C and thiamine administration may be a potential adjuvant therapy for septic shock. We aimed to investigate the impact of early vitamin C and thiamine administration in septic shock patients. Methods: This retrospective before-and-after cohort study used data extracted from the Korean Shock Society’s prospective septic shock registry. We compared 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between patients treated with intravenous vitamin C (3 g/12 h or 1.5 g/6 h) and thiamine (200 mg/12 h) <6 h after shock recognition from July through December 2017 (n = 229) and control patients from October 2015 through June 2017 (n = 915) using propensity score matching. Results: The 28-day (18.3% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.76) and in-hospital (16.6% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.55) mortality rates did not differ between treatment and control groups, nor did 28-day (18.5% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.84) and in-hospital (16.7% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.54) mortality rates after matching. In the subgroup analysis, treatment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with albumin <3.0 mg/dL or a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score >10. Conclusion: Early vitamin C and thiamine administration in patients with septic shock did not improve survival; however, administration could benefit conditions that are more severe, such as hypoalbuminemia or severe organ failure.

A Nationwide Comparison Between Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definition in Japan

BACKGROUND

Currently, it remains controversial whether the Sepsis-3 definition provides the most appropriate criteria for clinical use. The purpose of this study was to compare between the Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions using Japan's nationwide registry.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a multicenter registry conducted at 42 intensive care units (ICUs) throughout Japan, in which patients received treatment for severe sepsis or septic shock between January 2011 and December 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 2797 patients diagnosed using the Sepsis-2 criteria were included in the present study. These patients were categorized into "Severe sepsis" (n = 1154) and "Sepsis-2 shock" (n = 1643) groups. Among the "Sepsis-2 shock" group, patients who did not meet the Sepsis-3 criteria for septic shock were categorized into the "Sepsis-2 shock-only" (n = 448, 27.3%) group, while patients who met the Sepsis-3 criteria for septic shock were categorized into "Sepsis-3 shock (n = 1195, 72.7%)" group. The ICU mortality in the "Sepsis-3 shock" group, "Sepsis-2 shock-only" group, and "Severe sepsis" group was 28.5%, 10.9%, and 14.1%, respectively. We observed no significant difference between the "Severe sepsis" and "Sepsis-2 shock-only" groups in terms of in-hospital survival (P = .098), while the "Sepsis-3 shock" group had the highest in-hospital mortality rate (P < .001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, liver insufficiency and immunocompromised status were independent prognostic factors in the "Sepsis-2 shock-only" group. In contrast, chronic heart disease and chronic hemodialysis were independent prognostic factors in the "Sepsis-3 shock" group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICU mortality of the "Sepsis-2 shock-only" group was significantly low. Besides septic shock diagnosed by the Sepsis-3 definition selects patients with more severe cases of sepsis among the "Sepsis-2 shock" group.