Sedation with propofol during ERCP: is the combination with esketamine more effective and safer than with alfentanil? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

The Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Randomized Controlled Study

Purpose

Anesthesia for metabolic-bariatric surgery is challenging due to the increased risk of opioid-related adverse events. The purpose of the investigation was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of multimodal opioid-free general anesthesia with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in contrast with conventional opioid-based general anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

Eighty patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and eventually 71 patients included in the analysis. They were randomly divided into an opioid-based anesthesia group (control group) with sufentanil or opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) group. Esketamine, dexmedetomidine, and TAP were as part of the OFA. Sevoflurane, dexamethasone, and muscle relaxants were administered intraoperatively to all patients. The primary outcome was antiemetic rescue within 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, analgesic needs, extubation time, complications, the hemodynamic changes, and duration of hospital stay.

Results

In contrast with the control group, the need for antiemetic rescue was significantly reduced (p= 0.035). Furthermore, the visual Analog Scale (VAS) for postoperative pain was considerably lower in the OFA group (p <0.01) than it was in the control group. There was no significant difference in the need for analgesic rescue in both groups (p= 0.155). Extubation time and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay duration were equal between the two groups (p =0.328 and p =0.54). At the end of the surgery and after extubation, hemodynamic changes was more pronounced in the OFA group (p =0.027) than the control group. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter compared with the control group (p =0.002).

Conclusion

OFA with TAP results in a significant decrease in the need for antiemetic rescue, a lower level of pain after the surgery, and a shorter hospital stay in contrast with anesthesia based on opioids.

Balanced opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine and esketamine versus balanced anesthesia with sufentanil for gynecological endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

In this randomized controlled trial, 74 patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II) were enrolled and randomly divided into two study groups: (i) Group C (control), received sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg) and saline, followed by sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg∙h) and saline; and (ii) Group F (OFA), received esketamine (0.15 mg/kg) and lidocaine (2 mg/kg), followed by esketamine (0.1 mg/kg∙h) and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg∙h). The primary outcome was the 48-h time-weighted average (TWA) of postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, adverse effects, and postoperative sedation score, pain scores at different time points, analgesic consumption at 48 h, and gastrointestinal functional recovery. The 48-h TWAs of pain scores were 1.32 (0.78) (95% CI 1.06-1.58) and 1.09 (0.70) (95% CI 0.87-1.33) for Groups F and C, respectively. The estimated difference between Groups F and C was - 0.23 (95% CI - 0.58 - 0.12; P = 0.195). No differences were found in any of the secondary outcomes and no severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Balanced OFA with lidocaine and esketamine achieved similar effects to balanced anesthesia with sufentanil in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, without severe adverse effects.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2300067951, www.chictr.org.cn 01 February, 2023.

Dose-response study of propofol combined with two different doses of esketamine for laryngeal mask airway insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy

Objective

To prospectively determine the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol for inhibiting a response to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion when combined with different doses of esketamine in female patients.

Methods

A total of 58 female patients (aged 20-60 years, ASAⅠ-Ⅱ) scheduled for elective hysteroscopy were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups, one of which was administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine (K1 group, n = 28) and the other 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine (K2 group, n = 30). The 2 groups received the corresponding doses of esketamine intravenously, followed by an intravenous injection of propofol (injection time was 30 s). The initial dose of propofol was 2 mg/kg, and the dose ratio of propofol in the adjacent patients was 0.9. If a positive reaction occurred due to LMA insertion, the dose ratio in the next patient was increased by 1 gradient; if not, the dose ratio was decreased by 1 gradient. The ED50, 95 % effective dose (ED95) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in the 2 esketamine groups were calculated using probit analysis.

Results

The ED50 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 1.95 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.82-2.08 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 1.60 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.18-1.83 mg/kg) in the K2 group. The ED95 of propofol for inhibiting a response to LMA insertion in female patients was 2.22 mg/kg (95 % CI, 2.09-2.86 mg/kg) in the K1 group and 2.15 mg/kg (95 % CI, 1.88-3.09 mg/kg) in the K2 group.

Conclusion

Propofol combined with 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine has low ED50 and ED95 effective doses for inhibiting an LMA insertion response in female patients undergoing hysteroscopy and surgery. There were no significant adverse effects, but the additional dose of propofol and airway pressure were significantly higher than those in the group administered 0.2 mg/kg of esketamine. Based on the results, we recommend the combination of propofol with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine for optimal conditions during LMA insertion in women undergoing hysteroscopy.

Positive effects of low-dose S-ketamine on preventing myocardial injury after thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients aged 70 to 85

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of low-dose S-ketamine on marker of myocardial injury (BNP, hs-cTnT and HFABP) after thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients aged 70 to 85.

METHODS

One hundred patients (four cases excluded) aged 70-85 years, with body mass index 18-24 kg·m-2 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III, scheduled for elective lobectomy from April 2022 to April 2023, were selected. The patients were divided into two groups by a random number table method, namely, the low-dose S-ketamine combined with GDFT group (group S) and the control group (group C), with 48 cases in each group. In group S, a low dose of S-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) was given 1 min before intubation, and the maintenance dose was 0.12 mg·kg-1·h-1. Fluid therapy, guided by cardiac index (CI), changes in stroke volume (△SV), and other dynamic indicators, was used for rehydration during the operation. Group C was given the same amount of normal saline (0.2 mg/kg) 1 min before intubation, and the same rehydration therapy was adopted during the operation. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the two groups were observed and recorded immediately after entering the operating room (T0), immediately after intubation (T1), immediately after the beginning of one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T2), immediately after the beginning of surgery (T3), immediately after the end of OLV (T4), and at the end of surgery (T5). The intraoperative fluid intake and output and the use of vasoactive drugs were recorded. The plasma levels of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (HFABP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were recorded 24 h before operation and 24 and 48 h after operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest were recorded at 2 (V1), 6 (V2), 12 (V3), 24 (V4), and 48 h (V5) after operation, and the occurrence of myocardial ischemia during hospitalization was noted.

RESULTS

Compared with group C, MAP was significantly higher at T1-T5 in group S (P < 0.05), and the plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, BNP, hs-cTnT, and HFABP were significantly lower at 24 and 48 h after operation (P < 0.05). The VAS pain scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, the number of effective patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) compressions, and the total number of PCIA compressions within 48 h after operation were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with group C, The hospitalization days, and the incidence of postoperative myocardial ischemia in group S were lower (P < 0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in urine volume, extubation time, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, bleeding volume, colloid infusion volume, total fluid infusion volume, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose S-ketamine can reduce the levels of hs-cTnT, HFABP, and BNP in older patients after pulmonary lobectomy, which has a positive effect on preventing myocardial injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on CHICTR (registration No. ChiCTR2300074475). Date of registration: 08/08/2023.

Comparison of propofol-esketamine versus propofol for anesthesia in gastroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial

Objective

To compare the effects of propofol-esketamine and propofol in gastroscopy in adults.

Methods

This randomized controlled clinical trial was performed from January 2021 to March 2021. Eighty patients were enrolled and allocated into normal saline group (group N) and esketamine group (group E). The primary outcome was total amount of propofol. Secondary outcomes included incidences of injection pain, involuntary movement, hemodynamic and respiratory adverse events during examination, total examination time, recovery time and postoperative adverse effects.

Results

Total amount of propofol was significantly smaller in group E (101.64 ± 32.64 mg) than in group N (129.55 ± 36.34 mg, p = 0.001). Incidences of injection pain, involuntary movement and hypotension was significantly lower in group E than in group N. Incidences of hypertension and tachycardia was higher in group E than in group N. There was no significant difference in incidences of laryngospasm or hypoxemia, total examination time, recovery time, incidences of postoperative adverse effects between two groups.

Conclusion

Combination of propofol with 0.2 mg/kg esketamine reduced total amount of propofol, provided a more stable hemodynamic status and did not affect recovery time in gastroscopy.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2100042406.

Effect of Intraoperative Infusion of Esketamine on Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esketamine on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Patients (n = 74) scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly divided into two groups: the esketamine group (group E: 0.5 mg/kg/h infusion, i.e., 0.2 mL/kg/h) or the control group (group C: 0.2 mL/kg/h normal saline infusion). The infusions were stopped 20 min before the end of the procedure. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The secondary outcomes included QoR-40 scores on PODs 2 and 7, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on PODs 1, 2, and 7, time to extubation, additional postoperative analgesic use, length of hospital stay, and time to first exhaust. Additonally, the safety indices were also recorded, including hemodynamic profile, perioperative anesthesia index (Ai), utilization of vasoactive drugs or urapidil, and side effects.

RESULTS

All in all, 70 of the 74 patients completed the study, 35 in each group. The difference of QoR-40 scores on POD 1 was both statistically and clinically significant [difference 7.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.17, 9.25, p < 0.001]. The difference of QoR-40 on POD 2 was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (difference 4.81, 95% CI 2.69, 6.92, p < 0.001). The difference of NRS scores on POD 1 was statistically significant (difference -1.23, 95% CI -2.36, -0.10, p = 0.033). Compared with group C, group E had a lower utilization rate of phenylephrine and higher Ai values (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups on other measures.

CONCLUSION

Continuous ketamine infusion seems to be safe and well tolerated in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. It improved the quality of postoperative recovery and reduced pain on POD 1. In spite of the increased Ai value during the surgery, it also provided better hemodynamics with less usage of phenylephrine.

Evaluation of clinical effects of Esketamine on depression in patients with missed miscarriage: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with missed miscarriages are usually accompanied by varying degrees of depression, which is closely related to the patient's prognosis. We investigated whether Esketamine could alleviate postoperative depression symptoms in patients with missed miscarriages who underwent painless curettage.

METHODS

This study was a randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blind, single-center trial. A total of 105 patients with preoperative 1d (EPDS) ≥ 10 were randomly assigned to the Propofol; Dezocine; Esketamine group. Patients record EPDS at 7 and 42 days after the operation. Secondary outcomes included VAS for 1 h postoperation, total propofol usage, adverse reactions, And the expressions of inflammatory factors of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10.

RESULTS

Compared with the P and D group, patients in the S group had lower EPDS scores at 7 day (8.63 ± 3.14, 9.17 ± 3.23 vs. 6.34 ± 2.87 P = 0.0005) and 42 days (9.40 ± 2.67, 8.49 ± 3.05 vs.5.31 ± 2.49 P < 0.0001) after the operation. Respectively, Compared with the P group, the VAS scores (3.51 ± 1.12 vs. 2.80 ± 0.83, 2.40 ± 0.81, P = 0.0035) and the dosage of propofol used during operation (198.7 ± 47.48 vs. 145.5 ± 19.31, 142.9 ± 21.01 P < 0.0001) were lower in the D and S groups, and lower postoperative inflammatory response at 1 day after surgery. Other outcomes among the three groups were not found to the difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Esketamine effectively treated postoperative depressive symptoms of patients with a missed miscarriage, decreasing propofol consumption and inflammatory response.

Esketamine-based opioid-free anaesthesia alleviates postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

Although opioids are commonly prescribed in clinical anaesthesia, the significant side effects attributed to their overuse are raising increasing concerns. One way to reduce perioperative opioid consumption is to apply opioid-reduced anaesthesia (ORA) and even opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA), which involves regional techniques, neuraxial anaesthesia, nonopioid analgesics or combined use. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the application of OFA by using esketamine in intraoperative analgesia could minimize the side effects of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), as well as other short-term side effects related to anaesthesia.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 278 patients were enrolled; participants were nonsmoking female patients aged 18-50 years and scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy, ASA at I-III, with no serious physical or mental diseases. Both groups received usual perioperative care except for the analgesic medication of either esketamine or sufentanil. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included recovery status, pain, sedation level and overall recovery, delirium and cognition, anxiety and depression and total consumption of analgesic agents.

DISCUSSION

This trial may show that the synergy of esketamine and propofol anaesthesia reduces PONV as well as other short-term adverse events, thereby providing a better safety and satisfaction profile of ERAS for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100047169. Registered on June 9, 2021.

Effects of opioid-free propofol or remimazolam balanced anesthesia on hypoxemia incidence in patients with obesity during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

There are presently no consensuses on the optimal sedation strategy for obese patients during gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aim to explore the effects of opioid-free propofol or remimazolam balanced anesthesia on hypoxemia incidence in patients with obesity. A total of 264 patients were randomized to remimazolam + esketamine group (group R) or propofol + esketamine group (group P). Anesthesia in group P was administrated by propofol, esketamine and in group R by remimazolam, esketamine. The primary outcome was incidence of hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes were the time to loss of consciousness (LoC) and to recovery and the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions. We found the incidence of mild hypoxemia in group R was similar to that in group P (14.2% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.396). The incidence of severe hypoxemia in group R was significantly lower than Group P (4.2% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.019). The time to LoC in group R was longer than group P [Median (interquartile range, IQR): 53 s (45 to 61) vs. 50 s (42 to 54), p = 0.001]. The time to recovery from anesthesia in group R was less than group P [Median (IQR): 48 min (41 to 58) vs. 55.5 min (46 to 67), p<0.001]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (p > 0.05 for all). We concluded that compared with propofol combined with esketamine, remimazolam combined with esketamine can reduce the incidence of severe hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy in obese patients. Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, Identifier: ChiCTR2200065575.

Determining the effective dose of esketamine for mitigating pain during propofol injection by Dixon's up-and-down method: a double-blind, prospective clinical study of drug dose response

BACKGROUND

Propofol is an intravenous (IV) anesthetic medication widely used for procedural sedation, operative anesthesia, and in intensive care unit (ICU), but the incidence of pain during IV infusion can reach 28-90%. Ketamine can attenuate pain associated with IV propofol injection through local and central analgesic effects. Ketamine is gradually being transitioned to its S-enantiomer, esketamine, which has a similar mechanism of action. The purpose of our study is to determine the half effective dose (ED₅₀), 95% effective dose (ED₉₅), and 99% effective dose (ED₉₉) of esketamine for attenuating propofol injection pain using Dixon's up-and-down method to provide a reference for optimal dose selection for surgeries and procedures.

METHODS

Thirty gynecological patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery were enrolled in a sequential method to determine the effective dose of esticketamine for analgesic propofol injection in order of operation. This study was based on the sequential allocation up-and-down rule designed by Dixon, and each patient was induced by esticketamine combined with propofol. During induction, the target dose of esketamine was first given via venous access in the left hand of the patient, and 30 s later, a fixed dose of 2 mg/kg (1 ml/s) of propofol was given. Patient perception of pain was scored with the verbal rating scale (VRS) every 5 s after the start of the propofol infusion, and the evaluation was stopped once the patient became unresponsive. The dosage of esketamine was increased or decreased up or down according to the patient's pain response. The initial dose of esketamine was 0.2 mg/kg, and the gradient of adjacent dose was 0.02 mg/kg. If the pain response assessment of the upper patient was positive (+), the dose of esselketamine in the next patient was increased by 0.02 mg/kg; if the pain response assessment of the upper patient was negative (-), the dose of esselketamine in the next patient was decreased by 0.02 mg/kg. The tests were carried out sequentially, with the pain response changing from positive to negative or from negative to positive, and the tests were stopped after at least 6 crossover points, and the effective dose of esticketamine was calculated using probit probability regression analysis.

RESULTS

The ineffective group comprised patients with a positive pain response and the effective group comprised patients with a negative pain response. The 95% CI was set as the confidence interval of effective dose ED value，and we found esketamine's ED₅₀ = 0.143 mg/kg (0.120, 0.162 mg/kg), ED₉₅ = 0.176 mg/kg (0.159, 0.320 mg/kg), and ED₉₉ = 0.189 mg/kg (0.167, 0.394 mg/kg). The esketamine dose and VRS score during propofol injection were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05), whereas surgical duration, emergence time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of postoperative uterine contraction pain, and Riker sedation/anxiety scale (SAS) score were not significantly different. Bradycardia occurred in only one patient during anesthesia induction, while hemodynamics was stable in the rest of the patients without obvious adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

Small doses of esketamine combined with propofol can be safely and effectively used for hysteroscopic surgery. We recommended a dose of 0.2 mg/kg IV esketamine before induction of anesthesia to reduce the pain of propofol injection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100048951. Date of registration: July 19, 2021.

Subanaesthetic dose of esketamine during induction delays anaesthesia recovery a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Esketamine is an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA receptor) that is widely used for multimodal analgesia. In addition to analgesia, sedation is another important effect of esketamine. However, data are limited regarding the sedation effect of esketamine during general anaesthesia. The objective of this study was to determine whether sedation with a subanaesthetic does of esketamine affects anaesthesia recovery.

METHODS

Fifty patients, ASA I to II patient scheduled to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were randomly assigned to receive a single bolus of esketamine 0.2 mg kg-1 (esketamine group) or placebo (control group). Propofol, sufentanil and rocuronium were used during total intravenous anaesthesia. The patients' time of recovery from anaesthesia, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative agitation were analysed.

RESULTS

Data from 47 patients were analysed. The average time of anaesthetic recovery was 22.04 ± 1.48 min in the esketamine group(n = 23) and 17.54 ± 1.46 min in the control group(n = 24). The recovery time was significantly longer in the esketamine group. Postoperative pain in the PACU was lower in the esketamine group (NRS score range 0-2) than in the control group (NRS score range 0-3). There were no differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative agitation.

CONCLUSION

Subanaesthetic doses of esketamine can reduce postoperative pain in the PACU but delay the aesthetic recovery during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, without affecting postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative agitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry http://www.chictr.org.cn/ (Registration date: 20/11/2020; TrialID: ChiCTR2000040077 ).

Neonatal Anesthesia and Oxidative Stress

Neonatal anesthesia, while often essential for surgeries or imaging procedures, is accompanied by significant risks to redox balance in the brain due to the relatively weak antioxidant system in children. Oxidative stress is characterized by concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are elevated beyond what can be accommodated by the antioxidant defense system. In neonatal anesthesia, this has been proposed to be a contributing factor to some of the negative consequences (e.g., learning deficits and behavioral abnormalities) that are associated with early anesthetic exposure. In order to assess the relationship between neonatal anesthesia and oxidative stress, we first review the mechanisms of action of common anesthetic agents, the key pathways that produce the majority of ROS, and the main antioxidants. We then explore the possible immediate, short-term, and long-term pathways of neonatal-anesthesia-induced oxidative stress. We review a large body of literature describing oxidative stress to be evident during and immediately following neonatal anesthesia. Moreover, our review suggests that the short-term pathway has a temporally limited effect on oxidative stress, while the long-term pathway can manifest years later due to the altered development of neurons and neurovascular interactions.

Effectiveness of single loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for deep sedation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients: a prospective randomized study

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic procedure and requires deep sedation. Deep sedation with dexmedetomidine for the respiratory drive preserved has become popular in recent years. However, the use of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients is controversial because its adverse events are more common. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a single loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol for deep sedation of ERCP in elderly patients.

Methods

In this prospective randomized trial, 49 elderly patients undergoing ERCP were randomly allocated to the dexmedetomidine (DEX) or propofol (PRO) groups. The single loading dose of dexmedetomidine was set at 0.5 μg/kg at the start of anesthesia induction and loading for 10 min. The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of propofol. Secondary outcomes included time to awake, the frequency of airway interventions, and hemodynamics.

Results

The intraoperative cumulative dose of propofol was lower in the DEX group (111.0 ± 12.6 μg/kg/min) than the PRO group (143.7 ± 23.4 μg/kg/min) (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to awake between the two groups. The incidence of artificial airway interventions and hypotension in the PRO group (36%, 60%) were significantly higher than those in the DEX group (4.2%, 16.7%) (P = 0.011, P = 0.003, respectively). In addition, the occurrence of bradycardia increased significantly in the DEX group (58.3%) compared with the PRO group (12%) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The single loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol can reduce propofol consumption and artificial airway intervention and provide better hemodynamic stability than propofol for deep sedation in elderly patients during ERCP.

Trial registration

www.chictr.org.cn (Registration number ChiCTR1900028069, Registration date 10/12/2019).

ED50 and ED95 of propofol combined with different doses of esketamine for children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective dose-finding study using up-and-down sequential allocation method

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Propofol and esketamine are routine anaesthetics used in sedation or general anaesthesia for paediatric procedures. Coadministration could reduce the dose of either propofol or esketamine required and lower the incidence of drug-related adverse events. We designed a four-arm randomized controlled trial in children undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to investigate the dose of propofol with different doses of esketamine inducing appropriate depth of anaesthesia in 50% patients (median effective dose, ED₅₀ ).

METHODS

After getting the approval of the research ethics committee and informed consent, 92 paediatric patients planning for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into four groups randomly: esketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg groups (n = 23/group). Propofol doses followed the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method with different starting and interval doses between groups. During the first attempt of endoscope insertion, if patients' reactions prevented the insertion, it would be considered as a failure. The awakening time, total propofol doses, as well as the perioperative and post-procedure adverse events were evaluated and recorded for each patient.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The ED₅₀ (median, 95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly greater in esketamine 0 and 0.25 mg/kg groups in comparison with the esketamine 0.5 and 1 mg/kg groups (4.1 [3.3-4.9]; 3.1 [2.5-3.8] mg/kg vs. 1.8 [1.1-2.4]; 0.8 [0.2-1.3] mg/kg, respectively, p < .05). The total doses of propofol in esketamine 0.5 and 1 mg/kg groups were statistically lower than these in esketamine 0 and 0.25 mg/kg group (p < .01). The mean blood pressure was lower in the esketamine 0 mg/kg group than that in 1 mg/kg group after administration and during the procedure (p < .01). The esketamine 1 mg/kg group showed a higher incidence of vomiting and visual disturbances than the other three groups (p < .001).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In children who accomplished diagnostic paediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation/anaesthesia, the total dosage of propofol needed was reduced significantly in esketamine 0.5 and 1 mg/kg groups with a corresponding reduce in propofol-related hemodynamic changes. However, a higher incidence of esketamine-related adverse effects was found in esketamine 1 mg/kg group.

Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND:

Hypoxemia can occur during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether oxygenation using a nasal mask can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia compared with a traditional nasal cannula.

METHODS:

A total of 574 patients scheduled for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a nasal mask or a traditional nasal cannula for oxygenation. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, the proportion of emergency airway management, length of procedure, recovery time, and the satisfaction of the anesthetist and gastroenterologists as well as other adverse events (including cough, hiccups, nausea and vomiting, reflux, aspiration, and laryngospasm).

RESULTS:

A total of 565 patients were included in the analysis: 282 patients in the nasal cannula group and 283 patients in the nasal mask group. The incidence of hypoxemia was lower in the nasal mask group (18.0%) than in the nasal cannula group (27.7%; relative risk [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–0.89; P = .006), and the hypoxemia lasted a median of 18.0 seconds (interquartile range, 10.0–38.8) in the nasal mask group and 32.5 seconds (20.0–53.5) in the nasal cannula group (median difference –14.50; 95% CI, −22.82 to −1.34; P = .047). The proportion of patients requiring emergency airway management was significantly lower in the nasal mask group (8.8%) than in the nasal cannula group (19.1%; RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30–0.73; P < .001). No difference was found in the overall incidence of other adverse events between the 2 groups (nasal mask 20.8%; nasal cannula 17.0%; RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.87–1.73; P = .25). Satisfaction was higher with the nasal mask than with the nasal cannula from the perspective of anesthetists (96.1% for nasal mask versus 84.4% for nasal cannula; RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08–1.20; P < .001) and gastroenterologists (95.4% for mask versus 81.9% for cannula; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10–1.24; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, length of procedure, or recovery time between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Nasal mask oxygenation reduced the incidence of hypoxemia during anesthesia for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia.

The median effective concentration of propofol with different doses of esketamine during gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Propofol may result in hypotension, bradycardia and loss of protective reflexes, especially in elderly patients, while esketamine, a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has analgesic, anaesthetic and sympathomimetic properties and is known to cause less cardiorespiratory depression. We hypothesized that esketamine may reduce the median effective concentration (EC₅₀ ) of propofol and coadministration is less likely to produce hypotension during gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients.

METHODS

Ninety elderly patients, aged 65-89 years, undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned into 3 groups: SK0 (control) group (0 mg/kg esketamine); SK0.25 group (0.25 mg/kg esketamine); and SK0.5 group (0.5 mg/kg esketamine). Anaesthesia was achieved by plasma target-controlled infusion of propofol with different bolus doses of esketamine. The EC₅₀ of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy was determined by using the up-and-down method of Dixon. The initial plasma target concentration is 2.5 μg/mL and the adjacent concentration gradient is 0.5 μg/mL. Cardiovascular variables were also measured.

RESULTS

Propofol EC₅₀ s and its 95% confidence interval for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients were 3.69 (2.59-4.78), 2.45 (1.85-3.05) and 1.71 (1.15-2.27) μg/mL in the SK0, SK0.25 and SK0.5 groups, respectively (P < .05). The average percent change from baseline mean arterial pressure was -19.7 (7.55), -15.2 (7.14) and -10.1 (6.73), in the SK0, SK0.25 and SK0.5 groups, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Combination medication of propofol with esketamine reduced the propofol EC₅₀ during gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients compared with administration of propofol without esketamine. Increasing doses of SK with propofol are less likely to produce hypotension with shorter recovery time.

Indications, contraindications, and safety aspects of procedural sedation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a steadily increasing demand for procedural sedation outside the operating room, frequently performed in comorbid high-risk adult patients. This review evaluates the feasibility and advantages of sedation vs. general anesthesia for some of these new procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Generally, sedation performed by experienced staff is safe. Although for some endoscopic or transcatheter interventions sedation is feasible, results of the intervention might be improved when performed under general anesthesia. For elected procedures like intra-arterial treatment after acute ischemic stroke, avoiding general anesthesia and sedation at all might be the optimal treatment.

SUMMARY

Anesthesiologists are facing continuously new indications for procedural sedation in sometimes sophisticated diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Timely availability of anesthesia staff will mainly influence who is performing sedation, anesthesia or nonanesthesia personal. While the number of absolute contraindications for sedation decreased to almost zero, relative contraindications are becoming more relevant and should be tailored to the individual procedure and patient.

Comparison of ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) and midazolam-meperidine in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography (ERCP) for oldest old patients

Background and aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires moderate-to-deep conscious sedation. Combinations of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) and of midazolam and meperidine were analyzed using the bispectral index (BIS). There is no research on the use of ketofol on very elderly patients. The aim of this study is to use BIS and offer insight into the use and safety of ketofol sedation for oldest old patients undergoing ERCP.

Materials and methods: For the ERCP procedure, 168 patients aged 85+ years were enrolled in a 2-year retrospective single center study. Seventy-five patients received midazolam-meperidine (MM) sedation in 2016, while 75 patients received ketofol (KP) sedation in 2018.

The two groups were compared for patient data, procedure duration, Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and pulse oximetry (SpO₂), BIS, facial pain score (FPS), time to achieve BIS, recovery time, and complications. The total amount of rescue medication was recorded.

Results: The two groups did not differ by patient data or procedure duration (p>0.05). Group KP had significantly higher systolic and diastolic BP, HR, and SpO₂ values and lower BIS scores than Group MM (p=0.0001). The two groups did not differ by time to achieve BIS scores (p>0.05). Group KP had significantly fewer complications and a shorter recovery time than Group MM (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Ketofol induced sedation results in more stable vital signs and fewer complications than the midazolam-meperidine sedation regimen during ERCP in oldest old patients, indicating that ketofol can be an alternative to midazolam-meperidine.

Comparison of two supplement oxygen methods during gastroscopy with intravenous propofol anesthesia in obese patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hypoxemia is a major complication in obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under intravenous anesthesia or sedation due to altered airway anatomy. We design this randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare efficacy and safety of the Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) and nasal prongs for supplement oxygen during gastroscopy with intravenous propofol anesthesia in obese patients.

METHODS

The study will be a single-center, prospective RCT. A total of 308 obese patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to receive either the WNJT (group A) or nasal prongs (group B). During gastroscopy with intravenous propofol anesthesia, 5 L/min of oxygen will be delivered through the jet port of the WNJT in the group A and via the nasal prongs in the group B. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes are adverse events during the gastroscopy, postoperative complications, and satisfaction of the anesthetist, physician, and patient.

DISCUSSION

This RCT aims to clarify whether the WNJT can result in reduced incidences of hypoxemia and complications and provide improved satisfaction to the anesthetist, physician, and patient. Thus, it can be determined if the WNJT is a useful tool for supplement oxygen in obese patients undergoing gastroscopy with intravenous propofol anesthesia. The results will provide the evidence for anesthesiologists to make a decision regarding the choice of supplementary oxygen methods in this condition.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial, ChiCTR-IOR-17013089 . Registered on 23 October 2017.