Comparison of outcome measures and complication rates following three different approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Total hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent literature regarding regional anesthesia (RA) techniques and outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the face of changing surgical techniques and perioperative considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on large meta-analyses, peripheral nerve blocks are indicated for THA. Each block has its own risks and benefits and data for outcomes for particular techniques are limited. New surgical techniques, improved use of multimodal analgesia, and improved ultrasound guided regional anesthetics lead to better pain control for patients undergoing THA with less associated risks. Block selection continues to be influenced by provider comfort, surgical approach, patient anatomy, and postoperative goals. Head-to-head studies of particular nerve blocks are warranted.

A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Supine and Lateral Patient Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Surgical Approach

Background

To determine any differences in clinical outcomes between patients in the supine vs the lateral position during anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 368 patients undergoing THA via the ABMS approach (201 lateral vs 167 supine position) at our institution (2015-2019) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Inclusion criteria were all patients undergoing primary THA. Exclusion criteria were any revision surgeries and patients who did not undergo the ABMS THA. Outcomes assessed were postoperative complication rates, ambulation distance, length of stay, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain, stiffness, and physical function scores at 3 time periods (preoperative, 3 months postoperative, and 1 year postoperative).

Results

The supine group had significantly greater postoperative day 0 ambulation distance (150 vs 60 meters; P < .001), while no difference was observed on postoperative day 1 (210 meters in supine vs 200 in lateral; P = .921). Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the supine group (1; interquartile range 0-1) with respect to the lateral group (1; interquartile range 0-2; P < .001). The in-hospital complication rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), return to operating room rates (2.4% in supine vs 1.5% in lateral; P = .780), and readmission rates (5.4% in supine vs 5.0% in lateral; P = .631) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were observed across any Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores.

Conclusions

Both supine and lateral patient positioning provide acceptable early surgical outcomes, suggesting that satisfactory results can be obtained via both positions in THAs.

Efficacy of direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of the direct anterior approach (DAA) versus the posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and incision infection rate.

METHODS

We systematically searched databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese sci-tech journals, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, and Cochrane Library up to December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DAA with PLA in THA, with a minimum sample size of 80 and a follow-up of at least 6 months. Studies were screened by two independent researchers, following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted using a pre-established feature table, capturing study design, sample size, patient demographics, and outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-value statistical test and I² test. The fixed-effects model was used when heterogeneity was low; otherwise, the random-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The Meta-analysis revealed that DAA was associated with a longer operation time [MD = 5.89, 95%CI(2.26 to 9.51), P = 0.001] but resulted in a smaller incision length [MD = -2.99, 95%CI(-3.76 to -2.22), P < 0.00001], less intraoperative blood loss [MD=-108.36, 95%CI(-131.10 to -85.62), P < 0.00001], lower incidence of postoperative incision infection [OR = 0.39, 95%CI(0.19 to 0.83), P = 0.01], and reduced hip Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores on the 1st and 3rd days postoperatively [MD=-0.85, 95%CI(-0.96 to -0.74), P < 0.00001; MD=-0.60, 95%CI(-1.13 to -0.07), P = 0.03]. No significant difference was observed in VAS scores on the 7th postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

The DAA for THA offers advantages over PLA, including reduced incision size, blood loss, and postoperative pain, albeit with a longer operation time. These findings should guide clinical decision-making, considering the benefits and potential increased complexity of the DAA.

The Subjective Hip Value is a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive Instrument for Assessing Hip Function in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures are essential tools in clinical decision-making and research. Multi-item scores like the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) are time-consuming to collect and evaluate. The subjective hip value (SHV), as a single-item value, assesses hip function with one question: "What is the overall percent value of your hip if a completely normal hip represents 100%?". The aims of our study were to assess the psychometric properties, and thus validity, reliability, and responsiveness; and to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the SHV in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 137 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between June 2020 and August 2021 were prospectively enrolled. A SHV and mHHS were collected preoperatively and at follow-ups (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year). Validity, reliability, responsiveness, MCID, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between SHV and mHHS (P = .001) preoperatively (rs = 0.532), 6 weeks (rs = 0.649), 3 months (rs = 0.765), 6 months (rs = 0.854), and after 1 year (rs = 0.879). Test-retest reliability (rs = 0.74; P = .001) and responsiveness (rs = 0.24; P = .007) showed significant correlations. The MCID for SHV was 10.06%. Floor- and ceiling-effects were comparable to the mHHS.

CONCLUSIONS

The SHV is a valid, reliable, and responsive single-item score for the assessment of hip joint function in arthroplasty patients. It can detect clinically relevant changes in joint function and is easy to collect and interpret, which justifies its implementation in clinical practice.

Comparing direct anterior approach versus posterior approach or lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are several approaches to THA, and each has their respective advantages and disadvantages. Previous meta-analysis included non-randomised studies that introduce further heterogeneity and bias to the evidence presented. This meta-analysis aims to present level I evidence by comparing functional outcomes, peri-operative parameters and complications of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus posterior approach (PA) or lateral approach (LA) in THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive multi-database search (PubMed, OVID Medline, EMBASE) was conducted from date of database inception to 1st December 2020. Data from randomised controlled trials comparing outcomes of DAA versus PA or LA in THA were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies comprising 2010 patients were included in this meta-analysis. DAA has a longer operative time (MD = 17.38 min, 95%CI: 12.28, 22.47 min, P < 0.001) but a shorter length of stay compared to PA (MD = - 0.33 days, 95%CI: - 0.55, - 0.11 days, P = 0.003). There was no difference in operative time or length of stay when comparing DAA versus LA. DAA also had significantly better HHS than PA at 6 weeks (MD = 8.00, 95%CI: 5.85, 10.15, P < 0.001) and LA at 12 weeks (MD = 2.23, 95%CI: 0.31, 4.15, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in risk of neurapraxia for DAA versus LA or in risk of dislocations, periprosthetic fractures or VTE between DAA and PA or DAA and LA.

CONCLUSION

The DAA has better early functional outcomes with shorter mean length of stay but was associated with a longer operative time than PA. There was no difference in risk of dislocations, neurapraxias, periprosthetic fractures or VTE between approaches. Based on our results, choice of THA approach should ultimately be guided by surgeon experience, surgeon preference and patient factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Unusual Arteriovenous Malformation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Report of a Complicated Perioperative Course

It is not common to encounter arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the present case to draw attention to the possibility of an AVM during the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA, which, if not borne in mind, may lead to the myriad of complications related to excessive bleeding. An 81-year-old female presented to the emergency department with a left femoral neck fracture. She elected to undergo a THA via the DAA. Abnormal appearing blood vessels were present near the ascending circumflex branches, which provided difficulty in achieving hemostasis. Excessive blood loss was noted, and the patient received one unit of packed red blood cells during the operation. Hemoglobin and hematocrit dropped in the days following surgery, requiring several additional transfusions of blood products. When the patient complained of progressive left leg swelling on postoperative day 3, a computed tomography revealed large hematomas within the left adductors and the left iliopsoas muscle. Active extravasation was identified arising from a branch of the left profunda femoral artery, as well as an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in this area. Bleeding was controlled by selective endovascular coil embolization. As of current knowledge, this is the first reported intraoperative discovery of congenital arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with subsequent development of postoperative arteriovenous fistula and associated symptomatic hematomas in the setting of THA using the DAA. Early recognition and intervention of vascular malformations is essential in preventing potential limb- or life-threatening surgical complication.

Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: results 6 weeks and 2 years after surgery in a multisurgeon, single-center, and prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was the evaluation of pain, function, and overall satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different standard surgical approaches (DAA (direct anterior approach), lateral, and posterior approach) 2 years postoperatively. Additionally, we compared the results with recently published results of the same study population 6 weeks postoperatively.

METHODS

In a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study, a total of initial 188 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed on pain, function, and satisfaction within the first days, 6 weeks, and 2 years postoperatively according to three different approaches (DAA, lateral, and posterior approach). Our research group recently published results directly and 6 weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the same study collectively 2 years postoperatively and compared the results with the data 6 weeks postoperatively. One hundred twenty-five patients could be included. Outcome parameters for the present study were the pain level according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and an overall satisfaction scale 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean overall satisfaction 2 years postoperatively was 9.7 ± 1 (3-10). Satisfaction was significantly better for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.06) and between the DAA and the posterior approaches (p = 0.11). In total, the mean pain level was 0.4 ± 0.9 (0-5) at 6 weeks and 0.5 ± 1.1 (0-7) at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.3). Regarding the different approach groups, pain levels 6 weeks and 2 years postoperatively were significantly lower for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between DAA and posterior approach (p = 0.05) and the lateral and posterior approach (p = 0.26). The mean mHHS significantly increased from 84.7 + 14.5 (37.4-100) 6 weeks to 95 + 12.5 (23.1-100.1) 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Regarding the different approaches, mHHS was significantly higher for the DAA than for the lateral approach (p = 0.03). Differences between the DAA and the posterior approach (p = 0.11) and between the lateral and posterior approaches (p = 0.24) were insignificant.

CONCLUSION

At 2 years postoperative, DAA showed significantly better overall satisfaction, pain level, and mHHS than the lateral approach. The differences between DAA and the posterior approach and lateral and posterior approaches were insignificant. Whether the superior results of the DAA to the lateral approach persist over a longer period must be clarified by further studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study, level of evidence 2.

Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most reliable surgical interventions that has improved the quality of life in many patients. THA allows patients to have increased mobility, range of motion, and reduced pain in patients with degenerative hip joints. This surgical procedure has become an effective treatment option for several chronic conditions affecting the hip joint. Although this surgery has been shown to give promising results in patients with hip pathology, selecting the approach for THA is a critical step in pre-operative planning. The best approach for this surgical procedure depends on multiple factors and each present with their own challenges, success rates, and limitations. To further elucidate the advantages and disadvantages associated with different surgical approaches, we critically review each surgical approach along with the different causes of failure of the THA procedure.

Comparison of the early clinical efficacy of the SuperPath approach versus the modified Hardinge approach in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the SuperPath approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly population.

METHODS

From February 2018 to March 2019, 120 patients were randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients each: the SuperPath group and the conventional group. The results evaluated included the general operation situation, serum markers, blood loss, pain score, hip function and prosthesis location analysis.

RESULTS

There was no demographic difference between the two groups. Compared with the conventional group, the SuperPath group had a shorter operation time (78.4 vs. 93.0 min, p = 0.000), a smaller incision length (5.8 vs. 12.5 cm, p = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (121.5 vs. 178.8 ml, p = 0.000), a shorter hospitalization time (8.0 vs. 10.8 days, p = 0.000) and less drainage volume (77.8 vs. 141.2 ml, p = 0.000). The creatine kinase level in the SuperPath group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, while there was no difference in the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate level. The visual analog scale score was lower one month postoperatively, and the Harris hip score was higher three months postoperatively in the SuperPath group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the cup abduction angle or anteversion angle of the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We found better clinical efficacy after using the SuperPath approach with less muscle damage, less postoperative pain and better postoperative function than after using the modified Hardinge approach. Trial registration The randomized clinical trial was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 31/12/2020 (ChiCTR-2000041583, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=57008 ).

Time for return to sport following total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is being increasingly undertaken in younger and more active patients, with many of these patients wanting to return to sport (RTS) after surgery. However, the percentage of patients RTS and time at which they are able to get back to sport following surgery remains unknown. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the time patients RTS after THA.

METHODS

A search was performed on PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for trials on THA and RTS, in the English language, published from the inception of the database to October 2020. All clinical trials reporting on to RTS following THA were included. Data relating to patient demographics, methodological quality, RTS, clinical outcomes and complications were recorded. The PRISMA guidelines were used to undertake this study.

RESULTS

The initial literature search identified 1720 studies. Of these, 11 studies with 2297 patients matched the inclusion criteria. 3 studies with 154 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 40.0% (95% CI, 32.5-47.9%) of patients RTS between 2 and 3 months after surgery. 4 studies with 242 patients demonstrated an overall pooled proportion of 76.9% (95% CI, 71.5-82.0) of patients RTS by 6 months after surgery. Pooled proportion analysis from 7 trials with 560 patients demonstrated 93.9% (95% CI, 82.7-99.5%) of patients RTS between 6 and 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled proportion analysis showed increasingly more patients were able to RTS after THA over the first 1 year after surgery. There remains marked inter and intra-study variations in time for RTS but the pooled analysis shows that over 90% of patients were able to RTS at 6-12 months after THA. These finding will enable more informed discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about time for RTS following THA.

Do patient-reported outcome measures improve after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) changes in: (1) pain, function and global health; and (2) predictors of PROMs in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using a multilevel model with patients nested within surgeon.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 216 patients with baseline and 1-year PROMs who underwent aseptic rTHA between January 2016 and December 2017 were analysed. The most common indication for rTHA was aseptic loosening, instability, and implant failure. The PROMs included in this study were HOOS Pain and HOOS Physical Function Short-form (PS), Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (MCS). Multivariable linear regression models were constructed for predicting 1-year PROMs.

RESULTS

Mean 1-year PROMs improvement for aseptic revisions were 30.4 points for HOOS Pain and 22.1 points for HOOS PS. Predictors of better pain relief were patients with higher baseline pain scores. Predictors of better 1-year function were patients with higher baseline function and patients with a posterolateral hip surgical approach during revision. Although VR-12 PCS scores had an overall improvement, nearly 50% of patients saw no improvement or had worse physical component scores. Only 30.7% of patients reported improvements in VR-12 MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients undergoing aseptic rTHA improved in pain and function PROMs at 1 year. Although global health assessment improved overall, nearly half of aseptic rTHA patients reported no change in physical/mental health status. The associations highlighted in this study can help guide the shared decision-making process by setting expectations before aseptic revision THA.

Pain and rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty are approach dependent: a multisurgeon, single-center, prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess perioperative pain and mobilization after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using three different surgical approaches.

METHODS

This was a multisurgeon, prospective, single-center cohort study. A total of 188 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty (THA) between February 2019 and April 2019 were analyzed according to the surgical approach used (direct anterior, lateral, and posterior approach). Outcome parameters were the daily walking distance during the inpatient stay, the pain level according to the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and motion during the inpatient stay and at 6-week follow-up and the modified Harris Hips Score (mHHS) preoperatively and at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The walking distance within the groups increased significantly during the inpatient stay (p < 0.001). The DAA and posterior approach patients had a significantly longer walking distance than the lateral approach patients on the third postoperative day (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.02; posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.03). DAA and posterior approach patients reported significantly less pain during motion on the third postoperative day and at 6-week follow-up than the lateral approach patients (3 postoperative day: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.011; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.04; 6 weeks control: DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.001; Posterior vs. lateral 3, p = 0.005). The mHHS demonstrated significant improvement within each group. However, lateral approach patients reported significantly less improvement than the DAA and posterior approach patients (DAA vs. lateral, p = 0.007; posterior vs. lateral, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

This study analyzed perioperative pain progression and short-term rehabilitation after THA according to the different surgical approaches. Direct anterior and posterior approaches have shown comparable improvements in pain, walking distance, and mHHS. Whether this effect persists over a longer period of time must be clarified in future studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study, level of evidence, 2.

Patients Achieving 90°/45°/0° Intraoperative Stability Do Not Require Hip Precautions Following Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Hip precautions are traditionally employed after posterior total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary purpose was to investigate the necessity of hip precautions after posterior approach THA. We hypothesized that eliminating precautions in patients that achieved appropriate intraoperative stability would not increase the dislocation rate.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial of 346 consecutive eligible patients undergoing primary THA with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (range 11 months to 3.7 years).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

lumbar fusion, scoliosis, abductor insufficiency, inability to achieve intraoperative stability with combined 90° flexion and 45° internal rotation in 0° adduction. Fisher's exact test was used to compare dislocation rates between the hip precaution (HP) control group and no hip precaution (NP) study group. In addition, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in HOOS JR scores at 2, 6, 12 weeks between groups.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was not increased in the NP (0/172: 0%) group compared to the HP group 4/174 (2.29%) (P = .418). All dislocations occurred in the precautions group, two of which required revision. There were no differences in mean HOOS Jr. scores at any 2, 6, or 12 weeks (P > .05 at all timepoints) (secondary outcome).

CONCLUSION

Eliminating hip precautions in patients undergoing posterior approach THA that achieve 90°/45°/0° intraoperative stability does not increase the rate of dislocation. In fact, every dislocation occurred in patients receiving hip precautions. Short-term patient-reported outcome measures were not affected by hip precautions. Surgeons may discontinue the use of hip precautions as the standard of care in patients achieving 90°/45°/0° stability.

Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Realistic Patient Expectations for Patients With Low Baseline Activity

Primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are not often compared in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, surgeons and patients need to better understand the differences in PROMs between primary and revision surgery to set realistic patient expectations and recovery milestones. A matched cohort study of pTHA to rTHA was performed with our arthroplasty database of a single surgeon's experience from 2012 to 2018. There was a significant difference in both pre-operative assessment and change from preoperative to postoperative assessment of the PROMs. Patients undergoing pTHA had higher visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (67.9 vs 57.9, P=.004). Those undergoing rTHA had higher Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (57.1 vs 50.1, P=.008) and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) (33.5 vs 33.1, P=.01) scores. However, a significant change was noted in the difference from preoperative to postoperative scores between the pTHA and rTHA groups: Harris Hip Score (HHS) total score (pTHA 30.7 vs rTHA 4.4, P<.001), WOMAC score (pTHA 29.3 vs rTHA 12.2, P<.001), and VAS pain score (pTHA -48.3 vs rTHA -26.5, P<.001) as well as groin pain (pTHA 1.4% vs rTHA 7.1%, P=.02). Further, PROMs after rTHA were inferior to those after pTHA with several outcome instruments, including HHS, WOMAC score, and VAS pain score. In addition, groin pain was significantly greater in the rTHA cohort compared with the pTHA cohort at the latest follow-up. This study allows surgeons and patients to better understand the differences in PROMs to set realistic patient expectations and recovery milestones. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):251-255.].

Validity of repeated-measures analyses of in vitro arthroplasty kinematics and kinetics

In vitro models of arthroplasty enable pre-clinical testing and inform clinical decision making. Repeated-measures comparisons maximise resource efficiency, but their validity without testing order randomisation is not known. This study aimed to identify if there were any large testing order effects for cadaveric models of knee and hip arthroplasty. First, the effect of testing order on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) biomechanics was assessed. Extension moments for TKAs (N = 3) implanted into the native knee (TKA-only) were compared to a dataset of TKAs (N = 24) tested after different combinations of partial knee arthroplasty (TKA-last). The effect of repeatedly testing the same knee five times over 36 h on patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics was also quantified. Second, the effect of testing order on capsular ligament function after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was assessed. Randomisation was removed from a previously published dataset to create increasing and decreasing head size groups, which were compared with t-tests. All three TKA-only extension moments fell within the 95% CI of the TKA-last knees across the full range of knee flexion/extension. Repeated testing resulted in root-mean-squared kinematics errors within 1 mm, 1°, or < 5% of total range of motion. Following THA, smaller head-size resulted in greater laxity in both the increasing (p = 0.01) and decreasing (p < 0.001) groups. Testing order did not have large effects on either knee or hip arthroplasty biomechanics measured with in vitro cadaveric models.

Hip precautions after primary total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative exploration of clinical reasoning

PURPOSE

Hip precautions are movement restrictions that are often advised following primary total hip arthroplasty (PTHA) for osteoarthritis (OA), but there is limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in preventing dislocation. This study aimed to explore the clinical reasoning behind the continuation and discontinuation of hip precautions following PTHA for OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with therapists and surgeons at six centres using precautions and six centres not using precautions across secondary or tertiary NHS sites in England. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with fourteen surgeons and eighteen therapists. Of these clinicians, eight surgeons and ten therapists routinely advised precautions. Clinicians continued to use precautions to avoid dislocation by creating a boundary to movement, particularly important when dealing with patients who "push" these boundaries. Clinicians discontinued precautions because of a perceived negative impact on patients and the lack of supporting evidence. In the absence of a rise in dislocation rates for these centres, others have now changed practice.

CONCLUSION

This study offers insight into the clinical reasoning behind the continuation and discontinuation of hip precautions following PTHA for OA. The use of precautions remains controversial and further work is required to determine whether or not they should be advised.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRedesign of future rehabilitation pathways for primary total hip arthroplasty should take into account viewpoints from across the multidisciplinary team to aid decision making.Concern for patient behaviours, dislocation and litigation may be barriers to changing practice for rehabilitation after primary total hip arthroplasty.Clinicians may be discontinuing hip precautions because of known surgical advances, a perceived negative impact on patients and a lack of supporting evidence for historical practice.Individualised rehabilitation considerations are necessary for patients with risk factors that predispose them to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty, regardless of whether hip precautions are advised as standard at their given centre.

[Analysis of hemostatic effect and safety of tranexamic acid in primary simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty]

Objective

To explore the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on the transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, and postoperative complications in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA).

Methods

A clinical data of 72 patients who underwent the primary SBTHA between January 2010 and December 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. A single dose of 15 mg/kg TXA was administered intravenously before 5-10 minutes of operation in 48 patients of trial group and 24 patients were not treated with TXA in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in the gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading, comorbidity, and preoperative hospital stay, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation function tests. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, complication, and hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The median operation time of the trial group was 208.0 minutes, and that of the control group was 202.5 minutes, with no significant difference ( Z=-1.046, P=0.295). Postoperative transfusion was performed in 26 patients (54.2%) in the trial group and 21 patients (87.5%) in the control group, and the difference of transfusion rate between the two groups was significant ( χ ² =7.843, P=0.005). However, there was no significant difference in the amount of transfused suspended red blood cells and plasma between the two groups ( P>0.05). The median intraoperative blood loss was 550 mL in the trial group and 600 mL in the control group, with no significant difference ( Z=-1.378, P=0.168). The postoperative drainage volume and median dominant blood loss in the trial group were (542±269) and 1 050 mL, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(710±316) and 1 270 mL] ( P<0.05). There was 1 case of skin tension blisters around the incision, 1 case of lower limb numbness and muscle strength loss, and 1 case of lacunar cerebral infarction in the trial group, while in the control group, there was 1 case of skin ecchymosis around the incision and 1 case of bilateral lower limb numbness and muscle strength loss, which showed no significant difference in the incidences of complications ( P>0.05). No pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis was found in the two groups. The median postoperative hospital stay and median total hospital stay were 9.0 and 13.0 days in the trial group, while 9.0 and 13.0 days in the control group, respectively, with no significant difference ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients who are treated with the primary SBTHA, TXA can reduce transfusion rate and perioperative dominant blood loss, and has a good hemostatic effect without increasing complications of incision, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and hospital stay. Therefore, TXA is relative safe.

The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: Publication trends of Asian countries on PubMed

Background

Total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most successful surgical treatment for advanced hip osteoarthritis. Some surgical approaches for THR have been established, one of it is Direct Anterior Approach (DAA), which is a relatively new and less commonly used, especially in Asian countries. This review aims to consolidate information from PubMed on the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip replacement (THR) in Asian countries.

Purpose

To collect and consolidate information from PubMed on the total hip replacement (THR) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) in Asian countries.

Methods

A search on the PubMed was done for DAA for THR. There were 461 search results about the DAA for THR publications obtained in total, and 51 articles meet the criteria were analyzed for details. The details include top countries publishing the topics, number of publications per year, top 5 journal publishing the DAA for THR topics, top 5 first authors publishing the articles on this topic, and top 5 author on all position published this topic.

Results

The Journal of Arthroplasty was the leading publisher on this topic, with 10 articles published. Author Yasuhiro Homma, Tomonori Baba, and Kazuhiro Oinuma published the most number with 9 articles as one of the authors. Japan is the leading country for the publication on this topic with 34 published journals in total.

Conclusion

The number of published articles in Asian country per year is still inconsistent, with one year without any publication on this topic. Searching the data on the DAA for THR in PubMed bestow useful information about good sources of publication on this topic.

•

Direct anterior approach.

•

Total hip arthroplasty.

•

Publication trends.

•

Asian countries.

Conservative vs Surgical Treatment of Impacted Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients 75 Years and Older

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of conservative treatment (CST), internal fixation (IF), and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in treating patients older than 75 years with impacted femoral neck fracture (IFNF).

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial to compare clinical outcomes of CST, IF, and HA in IFNF patients older than 75 years with a 1:1:1 ratio.

SETTING

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 154 patients with IFNF aged between 75 and 97 years.

INTERVENTION

Patients with IFNF were allocated to CST, IF, and HA. They all received a 36-month follow-up.

MEASUREMENTS

All patients were evaluated by Harris hip score (HHS) (primary outcome) for hip function, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index scores for health-related quality of life, and visual analogue scale score for hip pain. Operation duration, blood loss, mortality, union rate, complications, and reoperation were also recorded. Assessors were blind to the type of treatment.

RESULTS

The baseline parameters of the three groups were similar. IF group had much lower blood loss than HA group (P < .05), while no significant difference in operative duration was found between the two groups (P > .05). HHS in HA group was significantly higher at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < .05), but no significant difference in HHS was found between CST and IF groups at any of the time points during the overall follow-up (P > .05). EQ-5D index score was higher in HA group at each follow-up within 1 year (P < .05), but the difference was not significant at 2- and 3-year follow-up (P > .05). There was no significant difference in mortality among the three groups at each follow-up point (P > .05). The nonunion rate was 11.76% (6/51) in CST group and 9.80% (5/51) in IF group and showed no significant difference (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

CST may be a feasible way for IFNF in the older patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04219943. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2214-2221, 2020.

Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential to affect the immediate postoperative recovery; however, there is limited published data comparing the 3 most common surgical approaches. The purpose of the study was to investigate postoperative pain and subsequent opioid consumption between surgical approaches (anterior-AA, lateral-LA, and posterior-PA) in those undergoing primary elective THA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study assessed patient demographics (age, sex, and body mass index), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, opioid naivety, operative details (anesthetic method, fixation method, and local infiltration analgesia), pain scores, and length of stay. Statistical analysis was performed with a 1-way analysis of variance 3 × 1 table with a P value < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 560 patients were included in the analysis (335 females and 225 males). The cohort consisted of 179 AA, 178 LA, and 203 PA patients. The average postoperative opioid usage was 63.05 (standard deviation [SD] = 42.97), 79.81 (SD = 56.10), and 77.50 (SD = 54.52) oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMEDD) for the AA, LA, and PA, respectively. The mean difference was 16.8 oMEDD lower in the AA compared with the LA (P < .01) and 14.5 oMEDD lower in the AA compared with the PA (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

The direct anterior approach was associated with lower daily opioid usage and pain scores after elective THA in the early postoperative period. This represents a potential 21% reduction in daily opioid dosage when compared with LA patients and 18.7% reduction in PA patients.

A novel single myocapsular sleeve (SMS) repair technique to reduce dislocation in posterior approach to the hip: A clinico-radiographic study

BACKGROUND

To assess a new modification of posterior approach to the hip and its effect on stability and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A comparative retrospective study was done to assess the functional outcome and rate of dislocation among 233 hips (Group A) operated by conventional posterior approach and 567 hips (Group B) by our novel modified posterior approach. In this technique, 2-3 stay sutures are applied in external rotators, then a single conjoint-myocapsular sleeve is raised linearly over the capsule with adherent fibers of gluteus minimus to piriformis tendon, short rotators and part of quadratus for exposure of femoral head. After inserting the definite prosthesis, upper part of sleeve (capsule, piriformis tendon) is sutured at the lower part of tip of greater trochanter & lower part with lateral trochanteric bone. Fifty patients, using randomised tables, in group B underwent MRI to evaluate the efficacy of the repair at 1 and 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Average Harris hip score at minimum 3.9 year follow up was 83.2 in Group A & 88.7 in Group B. Group B had only one dislocation (0.176%) while Group A had 12 dislocations (5.15%). MRI showed intact repair in 47 patients (94%); fibrous continuity in 2 patients (6%) in group B patients.

CONCLUSION

Intermediate results shows that this technique provides enhanced stability and improved functional outcome. But more prospective and randomised controlled studies with long term followup are required to confirm its role in prevention of hip dislocations.

Incidence and risk factors for heterotopic ossification following periprosthetic joint infection of the hip

INTRODUCTION

Heterotopic ossifications (HOs) commonly occur following total hip arthroplasty. Data regarding the appearance of HO after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip are rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and potential risk factors for the development of HO in patients with PJI of the hip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective study including patients treated with a two- or multistage operation and patients undergoing salvage procedure in cases of PJI of the hip with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. A total of 150 patients were included in the analysis. The Brooker-scale was used to classify HO. Patients were divided in three groups: (1) No HO, (2) HO Brooker type 1-4, and (3) high-grade HO (HO Brooker type 3 and 4). In each group, we checked possible risk factors for the development of HO for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Patients included in our study had a mean age of 70.4 ± 12.1 years. Of all patients, 75 were women (50%). HOs could be found in 70 patients (46.7%). Twenty-seven patients showed HO Brooker type 1, 23 type 2, 15 type 3 and 5 type 4. Male gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.14; p = 0.022], smoking (OR 5.75; p = 0.025) were significant risk factors for HO. A chronic infection (OR 3.54; p = 0.029) and a higher number of procedures (p = 0.009) were significant risk factors for the development of high-grade HO.

CONCLUSIONS

HOs often occur following surgical care of PJI. Male gender, smoking, a chronic infection and high number of operations are risk factors for developing HO after PJI.

Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty

The second most common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dislocation. The majority of dislocations occur early in the post-operative period and are due to either patient-associated or surgical factors. The patient-associated factors that have been implicated as causes of post-operative dislocation include previous surgery, lumbar spine fusion surgery and/or neurological impairment. The surgical factors include surgical approach, component orientation and prosthetic and/or bony impingement. In order to delineate the cause of the hip instability a thorough history and physical and a radiographic assessment (possibly including advanced imaging) needs to be performed. Approximately two thirds of cases are successfully treated; one third of cases will require surgical treatment (e.g., revision arthroplasty (including constrained liners, the use of elevated rim liners and dual mobility implants or trochanteric advancement). In this review, we discuss the causes leading to dislocation following THA and evaluate the different treatment options available.