HOPON (Hyperbaric Oxygen for the Prevention of Osteoradionecrosis): a randomised controlled trial of hyperbaric oxygen to prevent osteoradionecrosis of the irradiated mandible: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue injury

BACKGROUND

This is the third update of the original Cochrane Review published in July 2005 and updated previously in 2012 and 2016. Cancer is a significant global health issue. Radiotherapy is a treatment modality for many malignancies, and about 50% of people having radiotherapy will be long-term survivors. Some will experience late radiation tissue injury (LRTI), developing months or years following radiotherapy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested as a treatment for LRTI based on the ability to improve the blood supply to these tissues. It is postulated that HBOT may result in both healing of tissues and the prevention of complications following surgery and radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating or preventing late radiation tissue injury (LRTI) compared to regimens that excluded HBOT.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 24 January 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of HBOT versus no HBOT on LRTI prevention or healing.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. survival from time of randomisation to death from any cause; 2. complete or substantial resolution of clinical problem; 3. site-specific outcomes; and 4.

ADVERSE EVENTS

Our secondary outcomes were 5. resolution of pain; 6. improvement in quality of life, function, or both; and 7. site-specific outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen studies contributed to this review (1071 participants) with publications ranging from 1985 to 2022. We added four new studies to this updated review and evidence for the treatment of radiation proctitis, radiation cystitis, and the prevention and treatment of osteoradionecrosis (ORN). HBOT may not prevent death at one year (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.83; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 166 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is some evidence that HBOT may result in complete resolution or provide significant improvement of LRTI (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.89; I2 = 64%; 5 RCTs, 468 participants; low-certainty evidence) and HBOT may result in a large reduction in wound dehiscence following head and neck soft tissue surgery (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.94; I2 = 70%; 2 RCTs, 264 participants; low-certainty evidence). In addition, pain scores in ORN improve slightly after HBOT at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -10.72, 95% CI -18.97 to -2.47; I2 = 40%; 2 RCTs, 157 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events, HBOT results in a higher risk of a reduction in visual acuity (RR 4.03, 95% CI 1.65 to 9.84; 5 RCTs, 438 participants; high-certainty evidence). There was a risk of ear barotrauma in people receiving HBOT when no sham pressurisation was used for the control group (RR 9.08, 95% CI 2.21 to 37.26; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 357 participants; high-certainty evidence), but no such increase when a sham pressurisation was employed (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.21; I2 = 74%; 2 RCTs, 158 participants; high-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These small studies suggest that for people with LRTI affecting tissues of the head, neck, bladder and rectum, HBOT may be associated with improved outcomes (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). HBOT may also result in a reduced risk of wound dehiscence and a modest reduction in pain following head and neck irradiation. However, HBOT is unlikely to influence the risk of death in the short term. HBOT also carries a risk of adverse events, including an increased risk of a reduction in visual acuity (usually temporary) and of ear barotrauma on compression. Hence, the application of HBOT to selected participants may be justified. The small number of studies and participants, and the methodological and reporting inadequacies of some of the primary studies included in this review demand a cautious interpretation. More information is required on the subset of disease severity and tissue type affected that is most likely to benefit from this therapy, the time for which we can expect any benefits to persist and the most appropriate oxygen dose. Further research is required to establish the optimum participant selection and timing of any therapy. An economic evaluation should also be undertaken.

The Role of Dental Practitioners in the Management of Oncology Patients: The Head and Neck Radiation Oncology Patient and the Medical Oncology Patient

This narrative review addresses the role of a dentist in the management of oncology patients, highlighting the oral complications that arise in head and neck radiation oncology patients and medical oncology patients. The prevention and management of these complications are discussed.

Advances and Controversies in the Management of Osteoradionecrosis After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a painful and debilitating serious late complication following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) often requiring surgical resection of the jaw and complex multidisciplinary management. An important aggravating factor for mandibular ORN is surgical trauma, commonly dental extractions or implant placement following head and neck radiotherapy. The evidence on the treatment protocols ranges from conservative management to more radical surgical strategies including the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The available evidence on the preventive approaches for ORN includes prophylactic dental care prior to radiotherapy, the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treatment and prophylactic antibiotics for post-radiotherapy extractions. However, the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy has been questioned recently signifying poor understanding of the pathophysiology of the condition and therapies targeting the fibroatrophic process have become a focus of ORN treatment. Implementing recent IMRT radiation techniques has also shown evidence to reduce the incidence of ORN. This review provides an insight into the variations in definition and classification of the ORN, the controversies in its pathophysiology and the advances in the prevention and management.

Genetic variants associated with mandibular osteoradionecrosis following radiotherapy for head and neck malignancy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Utilising radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) often results in long term toxicities. Mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) represents a late toxicity associated with significant morbidity. We aim to identify a panel of common genetic variants which can predict ORN to aid development of personalised radiotherapy protocols.

METHOD

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays were applied to DNA samples from patients who had prior HNC radiotherapy and minimum two years follow-up. A case cohort of mandibular ORN was compared to a control group of participants recruited to CRUK HOPON clinical trial. Relevant clinical parameters influencing ORN risk (e.g. smoking/alcohol) were collected. Significant associations from array data were internally validated using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

Following inclusion of 141 patients in the analysis (52 cases, 89 controls), a model predictive for ORN was developed; after controlling for alcohol consumption, smoking, and age, 4053 SNPs were identified as significant. This was reduced to a representative model of 18 SNPs achieving 92% accuracy. Following internal technical validation, a six SNP model (rs34798038, rs6011731, rs2348569, rs530752, rs7477958, rs1415848) was retained within multivariate regression analysis (ROC AUC 0.859). Of these, four SNPs (rs34798038 (A/G) (p 0.006), rs6011731 (C/T) (p 0.018), rs530752 (A/G) (p 0.046) and rs2348569 (G/G) (p 0.005)) were significantly associated with the absence of ORN.

CONCLUSION

This is the first genome wide association study in HNC using ORN as the endpoint and offers new insight into ORN pathogenesis. Subject to validation, these variants may guide patient selection for personalised radiotherapy strategies.

Clinical study of treatment methods and associated factors in mandibular osteoradionecrosis

This study aimed to determine the appropriate treatment methods and evaluate associated factors by comparing nonoperative treatment alone with a combination of both nonoperative and surgical treatment in 34 patients with mandibular osteoradionecrosis (mORN). The associated cure factors were analyzed by Cox regression. Propensity scores were calculated from factors that were not significant in the univariate analysis and used as covariates in the multivariate analysis. The cure rate among patients who received nonoperative and surgical treatment was higher than that observed with nonoperative treatment alone. Only the treatment method was associated with cure in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

[Predictive factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis after irradiation of head and neck cancers]

The identification of the different risk factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) must be done before and after the management of patients with head and neck cancer. Various clinical criteria for this severe radiation-induced complication are related to the patient (intrinsic radiosensitivity, malnutrition associated with thin weight loss, active smoking intoxication, microcapillary involvement, precarious oral status, hyposalivation) and/or related to the disease (oral cavity, large tumor size, tumor mandibular invasion). Therapeutic risk factors are also associated with a higher risk of ORN (primary tumor surgery, concomitant radio-chemotherapy, post-irradiation dental avulsion, preventive non-observance with the absence of stomatological follow-up and daily installation of gutters fluoride and, non-observance curative healing treatments). Finally, various dosimetric studies have specified the parameters in order to target the dose values distributed in the mandible, which increases the risk of ORN. An mean mandibular dose greater than 48-54Gy and high percentages of mandibular volume receiving 40 to 60Gy appear to be discriminating in the risk of developing an ORN.

External fixation greatly improves outcomes in the surgical treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws without affecting quality of life: a five-year retrospective study

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw can be treated using both conservative treatment and surgery. External fixation may be used to bridge large resection defects after sequestrectomy for stabilisation and before secondary mandibular reconstruction. We designed a retrospective analysis of 70 patients with osteoradionecrosis treated between the years 2014 and 2018, and found that the use of external fixation greatly improves their outcomes. Patients were grouped according to Notani's classification: those who had Notani I disease were treated surgically but without external fixation; and those with Notani II and Notani III disease were eligible for external fixation. In those with Notani II disease, there was a significant reduction in the number of pathological fractures that occurred with external fixation. In those with Notani III disease, the success rate of primary sequestrectomy was only 1:14; however, those treated with external fixation all successfully healed after their first operation. It was hypothesised that although external fixation would improve outcome, it would come at a detriment to their quality of life (QoL). However, in a subset of these patients, we showed that in addition to increasing successful healing, patients' QoL with the external fixator was no worse than when they had an active osteonecrotic lesion. The treatment of osteoradionecrosis is cumbersome and advanced stages are associated with more complications. The use of an external fixator significantly reduces the probability of pathological fractures and increases the rate of successful healing in patients after mandibular resection. It does this without greatly interfering with patients' lives, while improving their condition sufficiently to allow for subsequent mandibular reconstruction.

Research Frontiers in Oral Toxicities of Cancer Therapies: Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaws

The deleterious effects of head and neck radiation on bone, with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) as the major disabling side effect of head and neck cancer treatment, are difficult to prevent and hard to treat. This review focuses on the current state of the science regarding the pathobiology, clinical impact, and management of ORN. With regard to the pathobiology underlying ORN, it is not yet confirmed whether the current radiation schedules by 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity modified radiotherapy result in an unchanged, decreased, or increased risk of developing ORN when compared with conventional radiation treatment, the main risk factor being the total radiation dose delivered on any clinically significant surface of the mandible.

With regard to the prevention of ORN, a thorough, early pre-irradiation dental assessment is still considered the first step to reduce the hazard of developing ORN post-radiotherapy, and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treatment reduces the risk of developing ORN in case of dental surgery in an irradiated field.

With regard to the treatment of ORN, the focus is bidirectional: elimination of the necrotic bone and improving the vascularity of the normal tissues that were included in the radiation portal. The cure rate of limited ORN by conservative therapy is approximately 50%, and the cure rate of surgical approaches when conservative therapy has failed is approximately 40%.

Whether it is effective to support conservative or surgical treatment with HBO as an adjuvant is not set. HBO treatment is shown to increase the vascularity of hard and soft tissues and has been reported to be beneficial in selected cases. However, in randomized clinical trials comparing the preventive effect of HBO on developing ORN with, eg, antibiotic coverage in patients needing dental surgery, the preventive effect of HBO was not shown to surpass that of a more conservative approach.

More recently, pharmacologic management was introduced in the treatment of ORN with success, but its efficacy has to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials. The major problem of performing well-designed randomized clinical trials in ORN is having access to large numbers of patients with well-defined, comparable cases of ORN. Because many institutions will not have large numbers of such ORN cases, national and international scientific societies must be approached to join multicenter trials. Fortunately, the interest of funding organizations and the number researchers with an interest in healthy aging is growing. Research aimed at prevention and reduction of the morbidity of cancer treatment fits well within these programs.