CASSETTE-clindamycin adjunctive therapy for severe Staphylococcus aureus treatment evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Does Adjunctive Clindamycin Have a Role in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia? A Protocol for the Adjunctive Treatment Domain of the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The use of adjunctive antibiotics directed against exotoxin production in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is widespread, and it is recommended in many guidelines, but this is based on limited evidence. Existing guidelines are based on the theoretical premise of toxin suppression, as many strains of S. aureus produce toxins such as leukocidins (eg, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, exfoliative toxins, and various enterotoxins). Many clinicians therefore believe that limiting exotoxin production release by S. aureus could reduce its virulence and improve clinical outcomes. Clindamycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic, is commonly used for this purpose. We report the domain-specific protocol, embedded in a large adaptive, platform trial, seeking to definitively answer this question.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial is a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter adaptive platform trial that aims to compare different SAB therapies, simultaneously, for 90-day mortality rates. The adjunctive treatment domain aims to test the effectiveness of adjunctive antibiotics, initially comparing clindamycin to no adjunctive antibiotic, but future adaptations may include other agents. Individuals will be randomized to receive either 5 days of adjunctive clindamycin (or lincomycin) or no adjunctive antibiotic therapy alongside standard-of-care antibiotics. Most participants with SAB (within 72 hours of index blood culture and with no contraindications) will be eligible to participate in this domain. Prespecified analyses are defined in the statistical appendix to the core protocol, and domain-specific secondary analyses will be adjusted for resistance to clindamycin, disease phenotype (complicated or uncomplicated SAB) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive isolate.

Second-Line Antibiotic Agents in Patient-Reported Penicillin or Cephalosporin Allergy Have No Negative Impact on Antibiotic Resistance After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare causative bacteria and their antibiotic resistance profiles in patients developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimens in primary total hip (THA) and primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA).

METHODS

We reviewed all cases of PJI occurring after primary THA and primary TKA/UKA, between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital. The standard preoperative prophylactic antibiotic for primary joint arthroplasty was cefuroxime and recommended second-line agent was clindamycin. Patients were divided by the replaced joint and analyzed independently.

RESULTS

In the THA group, culture-positive PJI was detected in 61 of 3,123 (2.0%) cefuroxime-administered cases and 6 of 206 (2.9%) noncefuroxime-administered cases. In the TKA/UKA group, culture positive PJI was identified in 21 of 2,455 (0.9%) cefuroxime-administered cases and in 3 of 211 (1.4%) noncefuroxime administered cases. The most commonly isolated bacteria in both groups were coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). There were no statistically significant differences of pathogen spectrum depending on the preoperative antibiotic regimen detected. Antibiotic resistance of isolated bacteria was significantly different in 4 of 27 (14.8%) analyzed antibiotics in THA and in 3 of 22 (13.6%) analyzed antibiotics in TKA/UKA. In all cohorts, a high occurrence of oxacillin-resistant CNS (50.0 to 100.0%) and clindamycin-resistant CNS (56.3 to 100.0%) has been observed.

CONCLUSION

The use of the second-line antibiotic did not influence the pathogen spectrum or antibiotic resistance. However, an alarmingly high proportion of CNS strains was resistant to clindamycin.

Establishment and evaluation of a specific antibiotic-induced inflammatory bowel disease model in rats

Physical and chemical methods for generating rat models of enteritis have been established; however, antibiotic induction has rarely been used for this purpose. The present study aimed to establish and evaluate a rat model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using antibiotics. A total of 84 Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were divided into the following groups, according to the dosage and method of administration of the antibiotics: A, control; B, low-dose clindamycin; C, medium-dose clindamycin; D, high-dose clindamycin; E, low-dose clindamycin, ampicillin and streptomycin; F, medium-dose clindamycin, ampicillin and streptomycin; and G, high-dose clindamycin, ampicillin and streptomycin. Antibiotic administration was stopped on day 7; the modeling period covered days 1-7, and the recovery period covered days 8-15. Half of the animals were dissected on day 11, with the remaining animals dissected on day 15. Food and water intake, body weight and fecal weight were recorded. Intestinal flora was analyzed via microbial culture and quantitative PCR. The content of TNF-α, IL1-β, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) was assessed in abdominal aorta blood. Colonic and rectal tissues were examined pathologically via hematoxylin-eosin staining to assess leukocyte infiltration and intestinal mucosal changes as indicators of inflammation. Rat weight, food intake, water intake and 2-h fecal weight were significantly different across the experimental groups (P = 0.040, P = 0.016, P<0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). Microbial cultures revealed no significant differences between group A and B,C (P = 0.546,0.872) but significant differences betwenn group A and the other experimental groups (all P<0.001). Furthermore, significant differences in the levels of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Dialister invisus on day 4 between groups A, C and F (P = 0.033, P = 0.025 and P = 0.034, respectively). Significant differences were detected in the levels of TNF-α, IL1-β, IL-6 and CRP between the groups (all P<0.001). The colonic and rectal pathological inflammation scores of the experimental groups were significantly different compared with group A (B vs. A, P = 0.002; others, all P<0.001). These findings indicated that an antibiotic-induced IBD model was successfully established in SD rats; this animal model may serve as a useful model for clinical IBD research.

Severe Staphylococcus aureus infections in children: Case reports and management of positive Panton-Valentine leucocidin cases

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known bacterium associated with carriage and responsible for different types of infections. The Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) is a key virulence factor causing tissue necrosis. PVL can, however, be present in both benign and life-threatening infections.

CASE REPORTS AND MANAGEMENT

We present three pediatric severe infections occurring over a period of only three weeks, in February 2021, and caused by genetically unrelated methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus producing PVL in a tertiary children's hospital in Belgium. The first one presented with necrotizing pneumonia, the second one with a neck abscess extended to the mediastinum, and the last one had sacral osteomyelitis complicated by endocarditis. The management of these infections is mostly based on expert opinions. The most appropriate treatment seems to be the combination of early surgical drainage of infected collections with an antibiotic regimen associating two antibiotics; beta-lactams and either clindamycin or linezolid. Human immunoglobulins also appear to be useful as adjunctive therapy.

CONCLUSION

PVL-producing Staphylococcus aureus is associated with life-threatening infections in children. Prompt management is needed including surgery and appropriate antibiotic regimens.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Combination antibiotic therapy with an antitoxin agent, such as clindamycin, is included in some guidelines for severe, toxin-mediated Staphylococcus aureus infections. The evidence to support this practice is currently limited to in vitro, animal and observational human case-series data, with no previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives

This pilot RCT aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial to examine if adjunctive clindamycin with standard therapy has greater efficacy than standard therapy alone for S. aureus infections.

Methods

We performed an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, pilot RCT (ACTRN12617001416381p) in adults and children with severe S. aureus infections, randomized to standard antibiotic therapy with or without clindamycin for 7 days.

Results

Over 28 months, across nine sites, 127 individuals were screened and 34 randomized, including 11 children (32%). The primary outcome—number of days alive and free of systemic inflammatory response syndrome ≤14 days—was similar between groups: clindamycin (3 days [IQR 1–6]) versus standard therapy (4 days [IQR 0–8]). The 90 day mortality was 0% (0/17) in the clindamycin group versus 24% (4/17) in the standard therapy group. Secondary outcomes—microbiological relapse, treatment failure or diarrhoea—were similar between groups.

Conclusions

As the first clinical trial assessing adjunctive clindamycin for S. aureus infections, this study indicates feasibility and that adults and children can be incorporated into one trial using harmonized endpoints, and there were no safety concerns. The CASSETTE trial will inform the definitive S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial, which includes an adjunctive clindamycin domain and participants with non-severe disease.

Select controversies in the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: answers and remaining questions from recent evidence

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical therapy. Vancomycin therapy remains the standard of care for most cases of MRSA bacteremia but has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic limitations, dosing complications, and known toxicity. Welcomed clinical trials have recently addressed some of the controversies that plague this field, including optimization of vancomycin dosing and use of combination therapy. In this review, we discuss these trials and their implications for clinical care and future research.