1
|
Morrow A, Steinberg J, Chan P, Tiernan G, Kennedy E, Egoroff N, Hilton D, Sankey L, Venchiarutti R, Hayward A, Pearn A, McKay S, Debono D, Hogden E, Taylor N. In person and virtual process mapping experiences to capture and explore variability in clinical practice: application to genetic referral pathways across seven Australian hospital networks. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:561-570. [PMID: 37036763 PMCID: PMC10415733 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic referral for Lynch syndrome (LS) exemplifies complex clinical pathways. Identifying target behaviours (TBs) for change and associated barriers requires structured group consultation activities with busy clinicians - consolidating implementation activities whilst retaining rigour is crucial. This study aimed to: i) use process mapping to gain in-depth understandings of site-specific LS testing and referral practices in Australian hospitals and support identification of TBs for change, ii) explore if barriers to identified TBs could be identified through process mapping focus-group data, and iii) demonstrate pandemic-induced transition from in-person to virtual group interactive process mapping methods. LS clinical stakeholders attended interactive in-person or virtual focus groups to develop site-specific "process maps" visually representing referral pathways. Content analysis of transcriptions informed site-specific process maps, then clinical audit data was compared to highlight TBs for change. TBs were reviewed in follow-up focus groups. Secondary thematic analysis explored barriers to identified TBs, coded against the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The transition from in-person to pandemic-induced virtual group interactive process mapping methods was documented. Process mapping highlighted six key areas of clinical practice variation across sites and site-specific TBs for change were identified. Key barriers to identified TBs emerged, categorised to seven TDF domains. Process mapping revealed variations in clinical practices surrounding LS referral between sites. Incorporating qualitative perspectives enhances process mapping by facilitating identification of TBs for change and barriers, providing a pathway to developing targeted interventions. Virtual process mapping activities produced detailed data and enabled comprehensive map development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Priscilla Chan
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gabriella Tiernan
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Kennedy
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natasha Egoroff
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Desiree Hilton
- Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rebecca Venchiarutti
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Hayward
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amy Pearn
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Skye McKay
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah Debono
- Centre for Health Services Management, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Hogden
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Implementation to Impact Hub, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor N, McKay S, Long JC, Gaff C, North K, Braithwaite J, Francis JJ, Best S. Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice. Implement Sci 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 37475088 PMCID: PMC10360252 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01284-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disentangling the interplay between experience-based intuition and theory-informed implementation is crucial for identifying the direct contribution theory can make for generating behaviour changes needed for successful evidence translation. In the context of 'clinicogenomics', a complex and rapidly evolving field demanding swift practice change, we aimed to (a) describe a combined clinician intuition- and theory-driven method for identifying determinants of and strategies for implementing clinicogenomics, and (b) articulate a structured approach to standardise hypothesised behavioural pathways and make potential underlying theory explicit. METHODS Interview data from 16 non-genetic medical specialists using genomics in practice identified three target behaviour areas across the testing process: (1) identifying patients, (2) test ordering and reporting, (3) communicating results. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to group barriers and facilitators to performing these actions. Barriers were grouped by distinct TDF domains, with 'overarching' TDF themes identified for overlapping barriers. Clinician intuitively-derived implementation strategies were matched with corresponding barriers, and retrospectively coded against behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Where no intuitive strategies were provided, theory-driven strategies were generated. An algorithm was developed and applied to articulate how implementation strategies address barriers to influence behaviour change. RESULTS Across all target behaviour areas, 32 identified barriers were coded across seven distinct TDF domains and eight overarching TDF themes. Within the 29 intuitive strategies, 21 BCTs were represented and used on 49 occasions to address 23 barriers. On 10 (20%) of these occasions, existing empirical links were found between BCTs and corresponding distinct TDF-coded barriers. Twenty additional theory-driven implementation strategies (using 19 BCTs on 31 occasions) were developed to address nine remaining barriers. CONCLUSION Clinicians naturally generate their own solutions when implementing clinical interventions, and in this clinicogenomics example these intuitive strategies aligned with theoretical recommendations 20% of the time. We have matched intuitive strategies with theory-driven BCTs to make potential underlying theory explicit through proposed structured hypothesised causal pathways. Transparency and efficiency are enhanced, providing a novel method to identify determinants of implementation. Operationalising this approach to support the design of implementation strategies may optimise practice change in response to rapidly evolving scientific advances requiring swift translation into healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, High Street Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Skye McKay
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, High Street Kensington, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kathryn North
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Best S, Long JC, Braithwaite J, Taylor N. Standardizing variation: Scaling up clinical genomics in Australia. Genet Med 2023; 25:100109. [PMID: 35115231 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical genomics demands close interaction of physicians, laboratory scientists, and genetic professionals. Taking genomics to scale requires an understanding of the underlying processes from the perspective of nongenetic physicians who are new to the field. We identified components of the processes amenable to adaptation when scaling up clinical genomics. METHODS Semistructured interviews informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework with nongenetic physicians, who were using clinical genomics in practice, were guided by an annotated process map with 7 steps following the patient's journey. Findings from the individual maps were synthesized into an overview process map and a series of individual maps by common location and specialty. Interviews were analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS In total, 16 nongenetic physicians (eg, nephrologists, immunologists) participated, generating 1 overview and 10 individual process maps. Sixteen common steps were identified across clinical specialties and locations, with variations over 9 steps. We report the potential for standardization across these 9 steps. CONCLUSION When scaling up complex interventions, it is essential to identify steps where variation can be accommodated. With these results we show how process mapping can be used to identify steps where variation is acceptable during scale up to accommodate adaptation to local context, allowing for the inevitable evolution of factors influencing ongoing implementation and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Best
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steinberg J, Chan P, Hogden E, Tiernan G, Morrow A, Kang YJ, He E, Venchiarutti R, Titterton L, Sankey L, Pearn A, Nichols C, McKay S, Hayward A, Egoroff N, Engel A, Gibbs P, Goodwin A, Harris M, Kench JG, Pachter N, Parkinson B, Pockney P, Ragunathan A, Smyth C, Solomon M, Steffens D, Toh JWT, Wallace M, Canfell K, Gill A, Macrae F, Tucker K, Taylor N. Lynch syndrome testing of colorectal cancer patients in a high-income country with universal healthcare: a retrospective study of current practice and gaps in seven australian hospitals. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:18. [PMID: 35509103 PMCID: PMC9066828 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To inform effective genomic medicine strategies, it is important to examine current approaches and gaps in well-established applications. Lynch syndrome (LS) causes 3-5% of colorectal cancers (CRCs). While guidelines commonly recommend LS tumour testing of all CRC patients, implementation in health systems is known to be highly variable. To provide insights on the heterogeneity in practice and current bottlenecks in a high-income country with universal healthcare, we characterise the approaches and gaps in LS testing and referral in seven Australian hospitals across three states. METHODS We obtained surgery, pathology, and genetics services data for 1,624 patients who underwent CRC resections from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018 in the included hospitals. RESULTS Tumour testing approaches differed between hospitals, with 0-19% of patients missing mismatch repair deficiency test results (total 211/1,624 patients). Tumour tests to exclude somatic MLH1 loss were incomplete at five hospitals (42/187 patients). Of 74 patients with tumour tests completed appropriately and indicating high risk of LS, 36 (49%) were missing a record of referral to genetics services for diagnostic testing, with higher missingness for older patients (0% of patients aged ≤ 40 years, 76% of patients aged > 70 years). Of 38 patients with high-risk tumour test results and genetics services referral, diagnostic testing was carried out for 25 (89%) and identified a LS pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant for 11 patients (44% of 25; 0.7% of 1,624 patients). CONCLUSIONS Given the LS testing and referral gaps, further work is needed to identify strategies for successful integration of LS testing into clinical care, and provide a model for hereditary cancers and broader genomic medicine. Standardised reporting may help clinicians interpret tumour test results and initiate further actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia.
| | - Priscilla Chan
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Emily Hogden
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Gabriella Tiernan
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - April Morrow
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Yoon-Jung Kang
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Emily He
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Rebecca Venchiarutti
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Leanna Titterton
- NSW Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Amy Pearn
- Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Skye McKay
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Anne Hayward
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natasha Egoroff
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Engel
- The University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - James G Kench
- Department of Tissue Pathology & Diagnostic Oncology, NSW Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Pockney
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Westmead Familial Cancer Services, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Michael Solomon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - James Wei Tatt Toh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Marina Wallace
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, South Metropolitan Health Service, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Anthony Gill
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, 153 Dowling St, NSW, 2011, Woolloomooloo, Australia
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morrow A, Chan P, Tiernan G, Steinberg J, Debono D, Wolfenden L, Tucker KM, Hogden E, Taylor N. Building capacity from within: qualitative evaluation of a training program aimed at upskilling healthcare workers in delivering an evidence-based implementation approach. Transl Behav Med 2021; 12:6320108. [PMID: 34255088 PMCID: PMC8765000 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Translating evidence into complex health systems is an ongoing challenge. Building the capacity of healthcare workers in behavioral and implementation science methods may facilitate the use of evidence-based implementation approaches, leading to sustainable and effective translation. The aim was to describe the development, contents and evaluation of a training workshop aimed at upskilling hospital-embedded staff to deliver an evidence-based implementation approach. The Hide and Seek Project (HaSP) is a cluster randomized controlled trial testing two implementation approaches for improving hereditary cancer referral at eight Australian hospitals. Healthcare workers were recruited as “Implementation Leads” and trained via a one-day workshop—TRAining in evideNce-baSed ImpLementATion for hEalth (TRANSLATE). The purpose of TRANSLATE was to upskill Implementation Leads in the delivery of HaSP, as well as implementation science methods more broadly. Implementation Leads participated in semi-structured evaluation interviews, which were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Nine Implementation Leads from various professional backgrounds completed the training. Four key themes were identified: (i) training day reactions, (ii) learning, (iii) implementation barriers and facilitators, and (iv) building health system capacity for implementation. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction, and anticipated that the knowledge and skills may be useful in the future. We describe a novel training program focused on the delivery of evidence-based implementation within health systems. Guided by insights from this study, methods to deliver the training on a larger scale and across different contexts are being explored. The prolonged impact of TRANSLATE will be further evaluated at trial completion. Trial registration: ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered on June 27, 2018
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown New South Wales, Australia
| | - Priscilla Chan
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gabriella Tiernan
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julia Steinberg
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown New South Wales, Australia
| | - Deborah Debono
- Centre for Health Services Management, School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Hogden
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aligning intuition and theory: enhancing the replicability of behaviour change interventions in cancer genetics. Implement Sci Commun 2020; 1:90. [PMID: 33073243 PMCID: PMC7557091 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00054-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite considerable encouragement for healthcare professionals to use or be clear about the theory used in their improvement programmes, the uptake of these approaches to design interventions or report their content is lacking. Recommendations suggest healthcare practitioners work with social and/or behavioural scientists to gain expertise in programme theory, ideally before, but even during or after the work is done. We aim to demonstrate the extent to which intuitive intervention strategies designed by healthcare professionals to overcome patient barriers to communicating genetic cancer risk information to family members align with a theoretical framework of behaviour change. Methods As part of a pre-post intervention study, a team of genetic counsellors aimed to understand, and design interventions to overcome, the major barriers a group of familial cancer patients face around communicating hereditary cancer risk information to their relatives. A behavioural change specialist worked with the team to review and recode barriers and interventions according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and 93 behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Resulting BCTs were cross-referenced against the Theory and Techniques Tool to examine whether evidence-based mechanistic links have been established to date. Results Five themes emerged from the genetic counsellor coded barriers, which when recoded according to the TDF represented seven domains of behaviour change. Forty-five experiential and intuitive interventions were used to tackle key barriers. These were represented by 21 BCTs, which were found to be used on 131 occasions. The full mapping exercise is presented, resulting in a suite of intervention strategies explicitly linked to a theoretical framework. Structured, written reflections were provided retrospectively by the core clinical team. Conclusions Although the ideal is to use theory prospectively, or even whilst a project is underway, making links between theory and interventions explicit, even retrospectively, can contribute towards standardising intervention strategies, furthering understanding of intervention effects, and enhancing the opportunities for accurate replicability and generalisability across other settings. Demonstrating to healthcare professionals how their intuition aligns with theory may highlight the additional benefits that theory has to offer and serve to promote its use in improvement.
Collapse
|
7
|
Feletto E, Lew JB, Worthington J, He E, Caruana M, Butler K, Hui H, Taylor N, Banks E, Barclay K, Broun K, Butt A, Carter R, Cuff J, Dessaix A, Ee H, Emery J, Frayling IM, Grogan P, Holden C, Horn C, Jenkins MA, Kench JG, Laaksonen MA, Leggett B, Mitchell G, Morris S, Parkinson B, St John DJ, Taoube L, Tucker K, Wakefield MA, Ward RL, Win AK, Worthley DL, Armstrong BK, Macrae FA, Canfell K. Pathways to a cancer-free future: a protocol for modelled evaluations to minimise the future burden of colorectal cancer in Australia. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036475. [PMID: 32565470 PMCID: PMC7307542 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With almost 50% of cases preventable and the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in place, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prime candidate for investment to reduce the cancer burden. The challenge is determining effective ways to reduce morbidity and mortality and their implementation through policy and practice. Pathways-Bowel is a multistage programme that aims to identify best-value investment in CRC control by integrating expert and end-user engagement; relevant evidence; modelled interventions to guide future investment; and policy-driven implementation of interventions using evidence-based methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pathways-Bowel is an iterative work programme incorporating a calibrated and validated CRC natural history model for Australia (Policy1-Bowel) and assessing the health and cost outcomes and resource use of targeted interventions. Experts help identify and prioritise modelled evaluations of changing trends and interventions and critically assess results to advise on their real-world applicability. Where appropriate the results are used to support public policy change and make the case for optimal investment in specific CRC control interventions. Fourteen high-priority evaluations have been modelled or planned, including evaluations of CRC outcomes from the changing prevalence of modifiable exposures, including smoking and body fatness; potential benefits of daily aspirin intake as chemoprevention; increasing CRC incidence in people aged <50 years; increasing screening participation in the general and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations; alternative screening technologies and modalities; and changes to follow-up surveillance protocols. Pathways-Bowel is a unique, comprehensive approach to evaluating CRC control; no prior body of work has assessed the relative benefits of a variety of interventions across CRC development and progression to produce a list of best-value investments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was not required as human participants were not involved. Findings are reported in a series of papers in peer-reviewed journals and presented at fora to engage the community and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Feletto
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joachim Worthington
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily He
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine Butler
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Harriet Hui
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Karen Barclay
- Northern Clinical School, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Broun
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Butt
- Research Strategy Office, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rob Carter
- Deakin Institute for Health Research, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeff Cuff
- Faculty of Science Biotech and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Research Advocate, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anita Dessaix
- Cancer Prevention and Advocacy, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hooi Ee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- General Practice and Primary Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian M Frayling
- Inherited Tumour Syndromes Research Group, Division of Cancer & Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Paul Grogan
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carol Holden
- No Australians Dying of Bowel Cancer Initiative, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher Horn
- Cancer Institute New South Wales, Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - James G Kench
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology & Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maarit A Laaksonen
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Barbara Leggett
- Conjoint Gastroenterology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Morris
- Research Advocate, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Lynch Syndrome Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D James St John
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Linda Taoube
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie A Wakefield
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Prevention and Early Detection, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel L Worthley
- No Australians Dying of Bowel Cancer Initiative, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bruce K Armstrong
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morrow A, Tucker KM, Shaw TJ, Parkinson B, Abraham C, Wolfenden L, Taylor N. Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033552. [PMID: 32540886 PMCID: PMC7299044 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In multisite intervention trials, implementation success often varies widely across settings. Process evaluations are crucial to interpreting trial outcomes and understanding contextual factors and causal chains necessary for successful implementation. Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition conferring an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Despite systematic screening protocols to identify Lynch syndrome, the condition remains largely underdiagnosed. The Hide and Seek Project ('HaSP') is a cluster randomised controlled trial determining the effectiveness of two approaches to improving Lynch syndrome detection at eight Australian hospital networks. To enhance widespread implementation of optimal Lynch syndrome identification, there is a need to understand not only what works, but also why, in what contexts, and at what costs. Here we describe an in-depth investigation of factors influencing successful implementation of procedures evaluated in the HaSP trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-methods, theory-driven process evaluation will be undertaken in parallel to the HaSP trial. Data will include: interviews of Implementation Leads and Lynch syndrome stakeholders, pre-post implementation questionnaires, audio analysis of meetings and focus groups, observation of multidisciplinary team meetings, fidelity checklists and project log analysis. Results will be triangulated and coded, drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Proctor's implementation outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Use of a theory-based process evaluation will enhance interpretation and generalisability of HaSP trial findings, and contribute to the implementation research field by furthering understanding of the conditions necessary for implementation success. Ethical approval has been granted and results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. At trial completion, key findings will be fed back to sites to enable refinement of intervention strategies, both in the context of Lynch syndrome and for the possible generalisability of intervention components in other genetic and broader clinical specialties. HASP TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Identifier: ACTRN12618001072202). Registered 27 June 2018. http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12618001072202.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim J Shaw
- Research in Implementation Science and eHealth (RISe), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- The Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Abraham
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|