Prednisone for patients with recurrent implantation failure: study protocol for a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Prednisone vs Placebo and Live Birth in Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Implantation failure remains a critical barrier to in vitro fertilization. Prednisone, as an immune-regulatory agent, is widely used to improve the probability of implantation and pregnancy, although the evidence for efficacy is inadequate.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of 10 mg of prednisone compared with placebo on live birth among women with recurrent implantation failure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 fertility centers in China. Eligible women who had a history of 2 or more unsuccessful embryo transfer cycles, were younger than 38 years when oocytes were retrieved, and were planning to undergo frozen-thawed embryo transfer with the availability of good-quality embryos were enrolled from November 2018 to August 2020 (final follow-up August 2021).

Interventions

Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive oral pills containing either 10 mg of prednisone (n = 357) or matching placebo (n = 358) once daily, from the day at which they started endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer through early pregnancy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was live birth, defined as the delivery of any number of neonates born at 28 or more weeks' gestation with signs of life.

Results

Among 715 women randomized (mean age, 32 years), 714 (99.9%) had data available on live birth outcomes and were included in the primary analysis. Live birth occurred among 37.8% of women (135 of 357) in the prednisone group vs 38.8% of women (139 of 358) in the placebo group (absolute difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -8.1% to 6.1%]; relative ratio [RR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.17]; P = .78). The rates of biochemical pregnancy loss were 17.3% in the prednisone group and 9.9% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 7.5% [95% CI, 0.6% to 14.3%]; RR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.99]; P = .04). Of those in the prednisone group, preterm delivery occurred among 11.8% and of those in the placebo group, 5.5% of pregnancies (absolute difference, 6.3% [95% CI, 0.2% to 12.4%]; RR, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.00 to 4.58]; P = .04). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, neonatal complications, congenital anomalies, other adverse events, or mean birthweights.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with recurrent implantation failure, treatment with prednisone did not improve live birth rate compared with placebo. Data suggested that the use of prednisone may increase the risk of preterm delivery and biochemical pregnancy loss. Our results challenge the value of prednisone use in clinical practice for the treatment of recurrent implantation failure.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800018783.

Prednisolone and enoxaparin (clexane) therapy ('the Bondi protocol') for repeated IVF failure

PROBLEM

What is the impact of an empirical immune therapy protocol of prednisolone and enoxaparin (clexane) (the 'Bondi protocol') on women with repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure?

METHOD OF STUDY

This was a retrospective review of live birth outcomes conducted on all transfer cycles performed by a single clinician (GS) at IVFAustralia between February 2016 and April 2020. This study consisted of 1786 transfer cycles, including 460 cycles treated with the Bondi protocol and 1326 without. Women with repeated IVF failure were given the Bondi protocol based on blood NK cell activity. Primary outcome was live birth and statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism software with significance for P-values < .05.

RESULTS

Overall 'Bondi' and 'normal' protocol cycles had similar rates of IVF/ICSI, fresh/frozen transfers and use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Women given the Bondi protocol were older, had more previous cycles and had higher blood NK cell activity. There was no significant difference in live birth rates (Bondi 26%, normal 28%). Bondi protocol live birth rates per transfer cycle were as high as 40% in patients under 38 years old. The Bondi protocol was more effective as NK activity increased from 'normal' to 'borderline' to 'high'. For high NK cell activity levels, live birth rates were over four times higher for women on the Bondi protocol (28%) than those on normal protocols (6%, P = .0007).

CONCLUSION

This study describes a simple and relatively safe immune therapy protocol that may improve IVF success rates in women with evidence of immune dysfunction.

IVF/ICSI outcomes of euthyroid infertile women with thyroid autoimmunity: does treatment with aspirin plus prednisone matter?

Background

Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) has been demonstrated to be associated with adverse pregnancy including recurrent miscarriage, unexplained infertility, and implantation failure. To settle with the fertility problem, prescribing aspirin combined with prednisone (P + A) to women positive for anti-thyroid antibodies is frequent in clinical practice, but the underlying effect remains controversial.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in three reproductive centers from 2017 to 2020. A total of 494 euthyroid infertile women were recruited who were positive for anti-thyroperoxidase and/or thyroglobulin antibodies (TPOAb and TgAb, respectively) with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels ranging 0.35-4.0mIU/L and underwent their first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle. Ultimately, 346 women were included of which 150 women were treated with prednisone (10 mg/d) and aspirin (100 mg/d). The remaining 196 women were untreated (control group). Treatment started on the day of embryo transfer and continued until clinical pregnancy was determined.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate was 57.5% vs. 63.5% in the control and treated groups (P = 0.414) for first fresh embryo transfer cycles and 57.8% vs. 61.8% for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles (P = 0.606). In addition, the live birth rate for the fresh embryo transfer was 49.6% vs. 47.3% in the control and treated groups (P = 0.762). Logistic regression revealed that aspirin plus prednisone did not improve the clinical pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate. Furthermore, it was observed that low free triiodothyronine (FT3) was associated with high miscarriage rates.

Conclusions

Utilizing an adjuvant treatment of P + A after the embryo transfer may not be necessary in euthyroid women with thyroid autoimmunity undergoing their first IVF-ET, regardless of the embryo type (fresh or frozen).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04532-2.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition process during embryo implantation

The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in endometrial epithelial and trophectoderm cells is essential for the progression of embryo implantation and its impairment could cause implantation failure. Therefore, EMT should be tightly regulated in both embryonic and endometrial cells during implantation. Studies reported the involvement of numerous factors in EMT regulation, including hormones, growth factors, transcription factors, microRNAs, aquaporins (AQPs), and ion channels. These factors act through different signaling pathways to affect the expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers as well as the cellular cytoskeleton. Although the mechanisms involved in cancer cell EMT have been well studied, little is known about EMT during embryo implantation. Therefore, we comprehensively reviewed different factors that regulate the EMT, a key event required for the conceptus implantation to the endometrium.Summary sentence: Abnormal epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process within endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) or trophoblast cells can cause implantation failure. This process is regulated by various factors. Thus, the objective of this review was to summarize the effective factors on the EMT process during implantation.

Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of the different therapeutic options for repeated embryo implantation failure (RIF) on a subsequent IVF cycle outcome. Twenty-two RCTs and nineteen observational studies were included. Pooling of results showed a beneficial effect of intrauterine PBMC infusion on both CPR (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.58-3.00; p < 0.00001; OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.22-3.36; p = 0.006) and LBR (RR 2.41; 95% CI 1.40-4.16; p = 0.002; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.13-12.29; p = 0.03), of subcutaneous G-CSF administration on CPR (RR 2.29; 95% CI 1.58-3.31; p < 0.0001) and of intrauterine PRP infusion on CPR (RR 2.45; 95% CI 1.55-3.86; p = 0.0001). Observational studies also demonstrated a positive effect of IVIG and intrauterine hCG infusion on both CPR and LBR and of atosiban on CPR. Studies investigating intrauterine G-CSF infusion, LMWH, intravenous intralipid, hysteroscopy, blastocyst-stage ET, ZIFT, PGT-A and AH failed to observe an impact on IVF outcome. The quality of the evidence that emerged from RCTs focused on intrauterine PBMC infusion and subcutaneous G-CSF administration was moderate. For all other therapies/interventions it varied from low to very low. In conclusion, intrauterine PBMC infusion and subcutaneous G-CSF administration are the most promising therapeutic options for RIF. However, further well conducted RCTs are necessary before their introduction into clinical practice.