1
|
Pöthe B, Conus P, Golay P. Impact of a family history of mental disorders on the characteristics of patients with early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2024. [PMID: 38572759 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM Children of parents with psychiatric illness have a higher risk of developing psychiatric disorders. This is particularly the case for psychoses and the evolution of these disorders could likely differ. The aim of this study was to study the impact of a first-degree and second-degree family history of psychiatric disorders (FHPD) on the characteristics of patients with early psychosis in a specialized programme. METHOD This research is a prospective study based on 408 patients aged 18-35 years enrolled in the Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP) with a three-years follow-up. Various characteristics were compared between patients with first-degree-FHPD and those without, then between patients with 2nd degree-FHPD and those without. The influence of the number of parents with first or second degree FHPD on clinical characteristics was also studied. RESULTS Our results showed an influence of FHPD on the characteristics of patients presenting a first episode of psychosis. Over the 3 years of follow-up, patients with at least one second-degree relative showed more negative and depressive symptoms and poorer general functioning than patient who did not. The number of parents with first or second degree FHPD was also negatively associated with several clinical variables. CONCLUSION The results of this study confirm the existence of a distinct premorbid profile and a different evolution in patients with FHPD, which is not limited to first-degree relatives. This suggests the importance of specific needs that should be addressed during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Pöthe
- General Psychiatry Service, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Conus
- General Psychiatry Service, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Golay
- General Psychiatry Service, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Community Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Political Science, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Furlong M, McGuinness C, Mulligan CM, McGarr SL, McGilloway S. Family Talk versus usual services in improving child and family psychosocial functioning in families with parental mental illness: a randomised controlled trial and cost analysis. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1287378. [PMID: 38606410 PMCID: PMC11007704 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1287378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Parental mental illness (PMI) is common and places children at high risk of developing psychological disorders. Family Talk (FT) is a well-known, whole-family, 7-session intervention designed to reduce the risk of transgenerational psychopathology. However, very few larger-scale evaluations of FT (across only a limited number of settings) have been conducted to date while there have been no cost analyses. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and costs of delivering FT in improving child and family psychosocial functioning in families with PMI within routine mental health settings. Methods A total of 83 families with PMI, with children aged 5-18 years, were randomly assigned on a 2:1 ratio to receive either the FT intervention (n=55 families) or usual services (n=28 families) across 10 adult, child and primary care mental health sites in Ireland. Parental disorders included anxiety/depression (57%), Bipolar Disorder (20%), Borderline Personality Disorder (12%), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (8%) and psychosis (2%). Detailed assessments with parents were conducted at baseline and 6-month follow up. Results FT led to significant improvements in family functioning and child behaviour at 6-month follow up when compared to usual services, with medium effect sizes indicated. Parent participants with lower mental health literacy at baseline also showed significant post-intervention improvements. Those parents with less severe mental illness at baseline, and families with more partner and economic supports, reported additional significant post-intervention improvements in child depression/anxiety and parental mental health symptoms. The cost of FT amounted to €761.50 per family, although this decreased to €415.31 when recurring costs only were included. Conclusion The findings from this study, which was conducted within the context of a national programme to introduce family-focused practice in Ireland, demonstrate that FT is a low-cost intervention that improved child and family psychosocial functioning across different mental health disorders within routine adult, child and primary care mental health services. The findings contribute to the growing evidence base for FT, and provide a robust basis to inform practice and policy development for families with parental mental illness both in Ireland and elsewhere. Clinical trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13365858, identifier ISRCTN13365858.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Furlong
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth, Ireland
| | | | - Christine Marie Mulligan
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Sharon Lisa McGarr
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Sinead McGilloway
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University Department of Psychology and Social Sciences Institute, Maynooth, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van Schoors M, Van Lierde E, Steeman K, Verhofstadt LL, Lemmens GMD. Protective factors enhancing resilience in children of parents with a mental illness: a systematic review. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1243784. [PMID: 38192397 PMCID: PMC10773682 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives A systematic review was conducted to (1) investigate protective factors enhancing resilience in children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI), and (2) examine theoretical and methodological issues in the existing literature. Method Following guidelines for systematic reviews, searches were performed using Web of Science, Pubmed and Embase. After screening 5,073 articles 37 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were extracted for review. Results of the present review indicate that there are several ways to help build resilience in COPMI. More specifically, five protective factors emerged from the reviewed literature: Information, Support, Family functioning and Connectedness, Child coping, and Parenting. Discussion Research on protective factors in children confronted with parental mental illness is still scarce and for some factors no clear conclusions can be drawn based on the available evidence. To further our understanding of the building blocks and underlying mechanisms of resilience in COPMI, additional rigorously designed studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lesley L. Verhofstadt
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gilbert M. D. Lemmens
- Department of Head and Skin – Psychiatry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nielsen SS, Mikkelsen LJ, Quaade N, Gladstone TRG, Beardslee WR, Bonnemose K, Rosenberg NK, Hjorthøj C, Thorup AAE, Nordentoft M, Ranning A. A study protocol for the randomized controlled trial SAFIR FAMILY TALK: a selective primary preventive intervention vs. service as usual for children of parents with mental illness. Trials 2023; 24:291. [PMID: 37087437 PMCID: PMC10122450 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07256-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children of parents with mental illness have an increased risk of developing mental illness themselves throughout their lifespan. This is due to genetic factors but also environmental disadvantages during childhood associated with parental mental illness. Selective primary preventive interventions for the children are recommended to mitigate risk factors and strengthen protective factors, but large-scale, longitudinal studies are needed. This study aims to investigate the effect of the Family Talk Preventive Intervention in a cohort of children and their parents with mental illness. METHODS The study is a randomized controlled trial with 286 planned families with at least one parent with any mental illness and at least one child aged 7 to 17 years. It will be carried out in the mental healthcare system in the Capital Region of Denmark. Families will be referred from hospitals and municipalities. The children and parents will be assessed at baseline and then randomized and allocated to either the Family Talk Preventive Intervention or service as usual. The intervention group will be assigned to Family Talk Preventive Intervention, a manualized programme consisting of ~ seven sessions for the family, including psychoeducation about parental mental illness and resilience in children, stimulating dialogue between family members and creating a common family narrative. The study period for both groups will be 12 months. Follow-up assessments will be conducted after 4 months and 12 months. The primary outcomes are the children's level of functioning, parental sense of competence and family functioning. DISCUSSION Given the prevalence of transgenerational transmission of mental illness, a systematic approach to prevention is needed in the mental healthcare setting. This study provides valuable knowledge on the Family Talk Preventive Intervention with a large sample size, inclusion of any parental mental illness and examination of the primary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05615324. Registered on 26 October 2022. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe S Nielsen
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth J Mikkelsen
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Nikolaj Quaade
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | | | | | - Katrina Bonnemose
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | | | - Carsten Hjorthøj
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne A E Thorup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Merete Nordentoft
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Ranning
- Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Research Unit (CORE), Copenhagen, Capitol Region of Denmark, Denmark.
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Furlong M, Mulligan C, McGarr S, O'Connor S, McGilloway S. A Family-Focused Intervention for Parental Mental Illness: A Practitioner Perspective. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:783161. [PMID: 34887791 PMCID: PMC8649663 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.783161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parental mental illness (PMI) is common and can lead to children developing mental disorders. Family Talk (FT) is a well-known and widely implemented intervention designed to reduce the risk of transgenerational psychopathology. However, given the research to practise "gap," very little qualitative research, to date, has investigated practitioner experiences in implementing FT. This study aimed to explore the practitioner-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation and sustainability of FT within mainstream mental health settings. Methods: This qualitative study was nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Family Talk [N = 86 families (139 parents, 221 children)] within 15 adult (AMHS), child (CAMHS), primary care mental health, and child protection sites in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were undertaken with a purposive sample of clinicians (n = 31) and managers (n = 10), based on their experiences of implementing FT. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, analysed using constructivist grounded theory, and informed by Fixsen's implementation science framework. Results: Service providers highlighted a number of benefits for approximately two thirds of families across different diagnoses and mental health settings (AMHS/CAMHS/primary care). Sites varied in their capacity to embed FT, with key enablers identified as acquiring managerial and organisational support, building clinician skill, and establishing interagency collaboration. Implementation challenges included: recruitment difficulties, stresses in working with multiply-disadvantaged families, disruption in delivery due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, and sustainability concerns (e.g., perceived fit of FT with organisational remit/capacity, systemic and cultural barriers to change). Conclusion: This study is only the second qualitative study ever conducted to explore practitioner experiences in implementing FT, and the first conducted within the context of an RCT and national research programme to introduce family-focused practise (FFP) for families living with PMI. The findings illuminate the successes and complexities of implementing FFP in a country without a "think family" infrastructure, whilst highlighting a number of important generalisable lessons for the implementation of FT, and other similar interventions, elsewhere.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mulligan C, Furlong M, McGarr S, O'Connor S, McGilloway S. The Family Talk Programme in Ireland: A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Families With Parental Mental Illness. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:783189. [PMID: 34867563 PMCID: PMC8634387 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.783189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parental mental illness is common, costly, can lead to children developing mental disorders and impaired lifetime outcomes, and places a substantial burden on caregiving partners. Family Talk (FT) is a widely implemented, 7-session, whole-family programme, with promising evidence of effectiveness in targeting the intergenerational transmission of mental illness. However, to date, very little qualitative research of family experiences of FT has been undertaken. The objectives of this study were to: (1) investigate the experiences of families attending FT; and (2) explore the key facilitators and barriers to engagement in mainstream mental health settings. Methods: This study was nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Family Talk [N = 86 families (139 parents, 221 children)] implemented in 15 adult, child and primary care mental health sites in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 45 participants, including 23 parents with mental illness (PMI), 7 partners and 15 children/young people aged 9 to 18 years. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using constructivist grounded theory. Results: Over two thirds of families across sites reported substantial benefits from participation in FT, including reduced stigma, giving children and partners a voice, increased service-user confidence, and improved family communication/relationships. Key facilitators identified by families included: programme delivery by a competent, non-judgmental clinician; the whole-family approach; and family readiness to engage. Barriers to engagement included stigma, family crises/relapse, service constraints, impact of COVID-19, and a need for further child, family and follow-up sessions/supports. Conclusion: This study is the first qualitative analysis of family experiences of FT to be conducted within the context of an RCT and national programme to introduce family-focused practise for families with PMI. The findings illustrate that FT is beneficial across cultural/policy contexts, different mental disorders and can be implemented across adult and child mental health settings, including children with existing mental health challenges. Key barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified by families, all of which should help to inform the future implementation of FT, and other similar interventions, both in Ireland and elsewhere.
Collapse
|
7
|
Furlong M, McGilloway S, Mulligan C, Killion MG, McGarr S, Grant A, Davidson G, Donaghy M. Covid-19 and Families With Parental Mental Illness: Crisis and Opportunity. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:567447. [PMID: 34385936 PMCID: PMC8353101 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.567447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 emergency has affected us all, but not equally. Families where parents have mental illness (PMI) are potentially at increased risk, but little is known about how they or their support services managed under lockdown/restrictions. We harnessed our existing partnerships with adult and child mental health services in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) and Northern Ireland (NI) to investigate the qualitative experiences of service users and families in coping during the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-May 2020), and how services were supporting them. Semi-structured phone/online interviews were conducted with 22 clinicians/managers (12 from RoI; 10 from NI) who provided information from their caseloads (~155 families with PMI). Sixteen family members (10 from RoI, 6 from NI) were also interviewed. Data were analysed using standard thematic analysis. Sixty percent of families reported improved mental health, primarily due to respite from daily stresses and the "normalisation" of mental distress in the general population. Approximately 30%, typically with more severe/enduring mental illness, reported additional challenges, and mental distress including: unmanageable child behaviours; fear of relapse/hospitalisation; financial difficulties; absence of child care; and a lack of routines. Service provision varied considerably across regions. The experiences within this case study highlight unique opportunities to address the multiple stresses of pre-emergency daily living. We also highlight how mental health services and governments might become more "pandemic ready" to more effectively support vulnerable families, including addressing service overload issues, optimising the use of digital technologies, and providing in-person contact and social supports where required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Furlong
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland
| | - Sinead McGilloway
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland
| | - Christine Mulligan
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland
| | - Mary G Killion
- Health Service Executive Galway, Roscommon Adult Mental Health Services, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sharon McGarr
- Centre for Mental Health and Community Research, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland
| | - Anne Grant
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Gavin Davidson
- Praxis Chair of Social Care, School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Mary Donaghy
- Mental Health & Learning Disability Lead & Think Family NI Lead, HSC Board, Belfast, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radley J, Sivarajah N, Moltrecht B, Klampe ML, Hudson F, Delahay R, Barlow J, Johns LC. A Scoping Review of Interventions Designed to Support Parents With Mental Illness That Would Be Appropriate for Parents With Psychosis. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:787166. [PMID: 35153857 PMCID: PMC8828543 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.787166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The experience of psychosis can present additional difficulties for parents, over and above the normal challenges of parenting. Although there is evidence about parenting interventions specifically targeted at parents with affective disorders, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder, there is currently limited evidence for parents with psychotic disorders. It is not yet known what, if any, interventions exist for this population, or what kinds of evaluations have been conducted. To address this, we conducted a scoping review to determine (1) what parenting interventions have been developed for parents with psychosis (either specifically for, or accessible by, this client group), (2) what components these interventions contain, and (3) what kinds of evaluations have been conducted. The eligibility criteria were broad; we included any report of an intervention for parents with a mental health diagnosis, in which parents with psychosis were eligible to take part, that had been published within the last 20 years. Two reviewers screened reports and extracted the data from the included reports. Thirty-eight studies of 34 interventions were included. The findings show that most interventions have been designed either for parents with any mental illness or parents with severe mental illness, and only two interventions were trialed with a group of parents with psychosis. After noting clusters of intervention components, five groups were formed focused on: (1) talking about parental mental illness, (2) improving parenting skills, (3) long-term tailored support for the whole family, (4) groups for parents with mental illness, and (5) family therapy. Twenty-three quantitative evaluations and 13 qualitative evaluations had been conducted but only eight interventions have or are being evaluated using a randomized controlled trial (RCT). More RCTs of these interventions are needed, in addition to further analysis of the components that are the most effective in changing outcomes for both the parent and their children, in order to support parents with psychosis and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Radley
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bettina Moltrecht
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Louise Klampe
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Felicity Hudson
- School of Psychological Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Delahay
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Barlow
- Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Louise C Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|