1
|
Bertrand D, Joly J, Neerinckx B, Durez P, Lenaerts J, Joos R, Thevissen K, Zwaenepoel T, Vanhoof J, Di Romana S, Taelman V, Van Essche E, Corluy L, Ribbens C, Vanden Berghe M, Devinck M, Ajeganova S, Durnez A, Boutsen Y, Margaux J, Peene I, Van Offel J, Doumen M, Pazmino S, De Meyst E, Kulyk M, Creten N, Westhovens R, Verschueren P. Effectiveness of methotrexate and bridging glucocorticoids with or without early introduction of a 6-month course of etanercept in early RA: results of the 2-year, pragmatic, randomised CareRA2020 trial. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004535. [PMID: 39117445 PMCID: PMC11409310 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if patients with early rheumatoid arthritis responding insufficiently to initial methotrexate (MTX) and bridging glucocorticoids (GCs) could benefit from early but temporary etanercept introduction as a second remission-induction attempt. METHODS CareRA2020 (NCT03649061) was a 2-year, open-label, multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Treatment-naïve patients started MTX and GC bridging (COBRA-Slim: CS). Within a time window from week (W) 8 until W32, early insufficient responders (28-joint Disease Activity Score - C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) >3.2 between W8 and W32 or ≥2.6 at W32) were randomised to a Standard-CS strategy (adding leflunomide first) or Bio-induction-CS strategy (adding etanercept for 24 weeks). Additional treatment adaptations followed the treat-to-target principle. Longitudinal disease activity (DAS28-CRP) over 104 weeks (primary outcome), achievement of DAS28-CRP <2.6 28 weeks after randomisation, and biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) use at W104 were compared between randomisation groups. RESULTS Following CS treatment, 142 patients were early responders; 55 early insufficient responders received Standard-CS and 55 Bio-induction-CS. Superiority of Bio-induction-CS over Standard-CS could not be demonstrated (ß=-0.204, (95% CI -0.486 to 0.078), p=0.157) for the primary outcome. More patients on Bio-induction-CS achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 at 28 weeks after randomisation (59% (95% CI 44% to 72%) vs 44% (95% CI 31% to 59%) in Standard-CS) and they were treated less frequently with b/tsDMARDs at W104 (19/55, 35%) compared with Standard-CS (29/55, 53%). CONCLUSION Half of the patients responded well to initial COBRA-Slim induction therapy. In early insufficient responders, adding etanercept for 6 months did not improve disease control over 104 weeks versus adding leflunomide first. However, temporary introduction of etanercept resulted in improved disease control early after randomisation and less patients on b/tsDMARDs at W104. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03649061. CTR PILOT APPROVAL BELGIUM S59474, EudraCT number: 2017-004054-41.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Bertrand
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Johan Joly
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Barbara Neerinckx
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Patrick Durez
- Department of Rheumatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Jan Lenaerts
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
- Reuma Instituut, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Rik Joos
- Department of Rheumatology, ZNA Jan Palfijn, Merksem, Belgium
| | - Kristof Thevissen
- Reumacentrum, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Limburg, Belgium
| | - Tom Zwaenepoel
- Department of Rheumatology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | | | - Silvana Di Romana
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Veerle Taelman
- Department of Rheumatology, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Els Van Essche
- Department of Rheumatology, Imeldaziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Luk Corluy
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Belgium
| | - Clio Ribbens
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marc Vanden Berghe
- Department of Rheumatology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi Site Saint-Joseph, Gilly, Hainaut, Belgium
| | - Mieke Devinck
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Sofia Ajeganova
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Durnez
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Jan Portaels, Vilvoorde, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Yves Boutsen
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
| | - Joëlle Margaux
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Peene
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV, Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Offel
- Department of Rheumatology, UZA, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michaël Doumen
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Sofia Pazmino
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Elias De Meyst
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Myroslava Kulyk
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Bogomolets National Medical University, Kiiv, Ukraine
| | | | - René Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heutz JW, Looijen AEM, Kuijpers JHSAM, Schreurs MWJ, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, de Jong PHP. The prognostic value of IgA anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor in an early arthritis population with a treat-to-target approach. Immunol Res 2024:10.1007/s12026-024-09500-w. [PMID: 38960995 DOI: 10.1007/s12026-024-09500-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
The mucosal origin hypothesis of rheumatoid arthritis has renewed the interest in IgA autoantibodies, but their added value over IgG anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) for modern treatment outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for treatment outcomes in an early arthritis population. IgA-ACPA/RF isotypes were measured in baseline sera from 480 inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients, who were included in the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort trial (tREACH). The tREACH trial was a multicentre, stratified, single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach. The prognostic value of IgA-ACPA/RF was determined by evaluating differences in (1) quick-attained (< 6 months after diagnosis) and persistent remission rates, (2) DMARD-free remission and (3) biological use between IA patients with and without IgA-ACPA/RF over 3 years of follow-up. IgA-ACPA was present in 23% of patients and overlapped with IgG-ACPA positivity in 94%. Similarly, IgA-RF overlapped with IgM-RF in 90% of patients. IgA-ACPA positivity was associated with lower DFR rates and more biological use, but this effect was largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA, since this effect disappeared after stratification for IgG-ACPA (HR 0.6, 95%CI 0.2-1.6 for DFR). No differences were observed in 'quick-attained and persistent remission' rates and for IgA-RF. Their seems to be no additional value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for modern, long-term clinical outcomes. The effects of IgA-ACPA seen in our study are largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA. Based on these results, there is no rationale for measuring these isotypes in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith W Heutz
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Agnes E M Looijen
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco W J Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heckert SL, Maassen JM, le Cessie S, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, Güler-Yüksel M, Lems W, Huizinga TW, Bergstra SA, Allaart CF. Long-term mortality in treated-to-target RA and UA: results of the BeSt and IMPROVED cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83:161-168. [PMID: 37979961 PMCID: PMC10850649 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study long-term (up to 20-year) mortality of two treat-to-target trial cohorts in undifferentiated arthritis (UA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS The BeSt (BehandelStrategieën) study (n=508, early RA) was performed between 2000 and 2012. For 10 years, patients were treated-to-target disease activity score (DAS)≤2.4.The Induction therapy with Methotrexate and Prednisone in Rheumatoid Or Very Early arthritic Disease (IMPROVED) study (n=610, early RA/UA) was performed between 2007 and 2015. For 5 years, patients were treated-to-target DAS<1.6.Vital status of BeSt/IMPROVED participants was assessed up to and including 31 December 2021. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Stratified analyses for anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and smoking status were performed. Death causes and the potential effect of disease activity during the trial period on late mortality were assessed. RESULTS Excess mortality was found in both BeSt (SMR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.53) and IMPROVED (SMR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.63) and became manifest after 10 years. Excess mortality was statistically significant in ACPA+ patients who smoked (BeSt: SMR 2.80, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.64; IMPROVED: 2.14, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.45). Mean survival time was 10 (95% CI 5 to 16) months shorter than expected in BeSt and 13 (95% CI 11 to 16) months in IMPROVED. The HR for mortality was 1.34 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.86; BeSt)/1.13 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.91; IMPROVED) per 1 point increase in mean DAS during the trial. The main cause of death was malignancy. CONCLUSIONS After long-term treatment-to-target, excess mortality occurred in patients with RA after>10 years since treatment start, with smoking as an important risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Louise Heckert
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna Maria Maassen
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - S le Cessie
- Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Melek Güler-Yüksel
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Lems
- Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Wj Huizinga
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spannenburg L, Reed H. Adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoids: A systematic review of the literature. Steroids 2023; 200:109314. [PMID: 37758053 DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2023.109314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glucocorticoids as a drug class are widely used in the treatment of many conditions including more recently as one of the mainstay treatments for the SARS-CoV-2 infection. The physiological adverse effects are well described. However, less is known and understood about the potentially deleterious neuro-cognitive effects of this class of medication. METHODS We carried out a systematic review of the literature using two separate search strategies. The first focussed on the rates of reporting of adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoid use in randomised controlled trials. The second looked at those studies focussing directly on adverse cognitive effects associated with the use of glucocorticoids. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library was searched for randomised controlled trials utilising glucocorticoids as a part of a treatment regimen. Additionally, these databases were also used to search for articles looking directly at the adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoids. RESULTS Of the forty-three RCTs included as a part of the first search strategy, only one (2.3%) included specific documentation pertaining to cognitive side effects. As a part of the twenty studies included in the second search strategy, eleven of the included studies (55%) were able to demonstrate a correlation between glucocorticoid use and decreased cognition. Most studies within this strategy showed that GCs predominately affected hippocampus-dependent functions such as memory, while sparing executive function and attention. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the data reporting of adverse clinical effects of glucocorticoid use is poor in recent RCTs. Given the demonstrable effect on predominately hippocampal-dependent cognitive functions evident within the literature, more thorough documentation is needed within clinical research to fully appreciate the potentially widespread nature of these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Spannenburg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, School of Clinical Medicine, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; Metro South Hospital & Health Service, Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
| | - Hayley Reed
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, School of Clinical Medicine, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4101, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen SF, Yeh FC, Chen CY, Chang HY. Tailored therapeutic decision of rheumatoid arthritis using proteomic strategies: how to start and when to stop? Clin Proteomics 2023; 20:22. [PMID: 37301840 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-023-09411-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Unpredictable treatment responses have been an obstacle for the successful management of rheumatoid arthritis. Although numerous serum proteins have been proposed, there is a lack of integrative survey to compare their relevance in predicting treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Also, little is known about their applications in various treatment stages, such as dose modification, drug switching or withdrawal. Here we present an in-depth exploration of the potential usefulness of serum proteins in clinical decision-making and unveil the spectrum of immunopathology underlying responders to different drugs. Patients with robust autoimmunity and inflammation are more responsive to biological treatments and prone to relapse during treatment de-escalation. Moreover, the concentration changes of serum proteins at the beginning of the treatments possibly assist early recognition of treatment responders. With a better understanding of the relationship between the serum proteome and treatment responses, personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis will be more achievable in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo-Fu Chen
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chiang Yeh
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yun Chen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Yin Chang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Institute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, No. 300, Zhongda Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan, 320317, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Emery P, Tanaka Y, Bykerk VP, Bingham CO, Huizinga TWJ, Citera G, Huang KHG, Wu C, Connolly SE, Elbez Y, Wong R, Lozenski K, Fleischmann R. The trajectory of clinical responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who achieve sustained remission in response to abatacept: subanalysis of AVERT-2, a randomized phase IIIb study. Arthritis Res Ther 2023; 25:67. [PMID: 37087459 PMCID: PMC10122306 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03038-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AVERT-2 (a phase IIIb, two-stage study) evaluated abatacept + methotrexate versus methotrexate alone, in methotrexate-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive patients with early (≤ 6 months), active RA. This subanalysis investigated whether individual patients who achieved the week 24 Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission primary endpoint could sustain remission to 1 year and then maintain it following changes in therapy. METHODS During the 56-week induction period (IP), patients were randomized to weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg + methotrexate or abatacept placebo + methotrexate. Patients completing the IP who achieved SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at weeks 40 and 52 entered a 48-week de-escalation (DE) period. Patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate were re-randomized to continue weekly abatacept + methotrexate, or de-escalate and then withdraw abatacept (after 24 weeks), or receive abatacept monotherapy. Proportions of patients achieving sustained SDAI and Boolean remission, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28 [CRP]) < 2.6, were assessed. For patients achieving early sustained SDAI remission at weeks 24/40/52, flow between disease activity categories and individual trajectories was evaluated; flow was also evaluated for later remitters (weeks 40/52 but not week 24). RESULTS Among patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate (n/N = 451/752) at IP week 24, 22% achieved SDAI remission, 17% achieved Boolean remission, and 42% achieved DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6; of these, 56%, 58%, and 74%, respectively, sustained a response throughout IP weeks 40/52. Among patients with a sustained response at IP weeks 24/40/52, 82% (14/17) on weekly abatacept + methotrexate, 81% (13/16) on abatacept monotherapy, 63% (12/19) who de-escalated/withdrew abatacept, and 65% (11/17) on abatacept placebo + methotrexate were in SDAI remission at end of the DE period; rates were higher than for later remitters in all arms except abatacept placebo + methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of individual patients achieving clinical endpoints at IP week 24 with abatacept + methotrexate sustained their responses through week 52. Of patients achieving early and sustained SDAI remission through 52 weeks, numerically more maintained remission during the DE period if weekly abatacept treatment continued. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02504268 (ClinicalTrials.gov), registered July 21, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Gustavo Citera
- Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Chun Wu
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Roy Fleischmann
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Emery P, Tanaka Y, Bykerk VP, Huizinga TWJ, Citera G, Bingham CO, Banerjee S, Soule BP, Nys M, Connolly SE, Lozenski KL, Zhuo J, Wong R, Huang KHG, Fleischmann R. Sustained Remission and Outcomes with Abatacept plus Methotrexate Following Stepwise Dose De-escalation in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:707-727. [PMID: 36869251 PMCID: PMC10140217 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00519-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One target of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve early sustained remission; over the long term, patients in sustained remission have less structural joint damage and physical disability. We evaluated Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission with abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate and impact of de-escalation (DE) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients with early RA. METHODS The phase IIIb, randomized, AVERT-2 two-stage study (NCT02504268) evaluated weekly abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate. PRIMARY ENDPOINT SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at week 24. Pre-planned exploratory endpoint: maintenance of remission in patients with sustained remission (weeks 40 and 52) who, from week 56 for 48 weeks (DE period), (1) continued combination abatacept + methotrexate, (2) tapered abatacept to every other week (EOW) + methotrexate for 24 weeks with subsequent abatacept withdrawal (abatacept placebo + methotrexate), or (3) withdrew methotrexate (abatacept monotherapy). RESULTS Primary study endpoint was not met: 21.3% (48/225) of patients in the combination and 16.0% (24/150) in the abatacept placebo + methotrexate arm achieved SDAI remission at week 24 (p = 0.2359). There were numerical differences favoring combination therapy in clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and week 52 radiographic non-progression. After week 56, 147 patients in sustained remission with abatacept + methotrexate were randomized (combination, n = 50; DE/withdrawal, n = 50; abatacept monotherapy, n = 47) and entered DE. At DE week 48, SDAI remission (74%) and PRO improvements were mostly maintained with continued combination therapy; lower remission rates were observed with abatacept placebo + methotrexate (48.0%) and with abatacept monotherapy (57.4%). Before withdrawal, de-escalating to abatacept EOW + methotrexate preserved remission. CONCLUSIONS The stringent primary endpoint was not met. However, in patients achieving sustained SDAI remission, numerically more maintained remission with continued abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept monotherapy or withdrawal. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02504268. Video abstract (MP4 62241 KB).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Thomas W J Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gustavo Citera
- Department of Rheumatology, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Clifton O Bingham
- Divisions of Rheumatology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Subhashis Banerjee
- Immunology and Fibrosis/Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin P Soule
- Fibrosis Business Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marleen Nys
- Global Biometrics and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium
| | - Sean E Connolly
- Immunology and Fibrosis/Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Karissa L Lozenski
- Immunology and Fibrosis/Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Joe Zhuo
- Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Robert Wong
- Immunology and Fibrosis/Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang
- Immunology and Fibrosis/Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Roy Fleischmann
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vitale A, Alivernini S, Caporali R, Cassone G, Bruno D, Cantarini L, Lopalco G, Rossini M, Atzeni F, Favalli EG, Conti F, Gremese E, Iannone F, Ferraccioli GF, Lapadula G, Sebastiani M. From Bench to Bedside in Rheumatoid Arthritis from the "2022 GISEA International Symposium". J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020527. [PMID: 36675455 PMCID: PMC9863451 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
While precision medicine is still a challenge in rheumatic disease, in recent years many advances have been made regarding pathogenesis, the treatment of inflammatory arthropathies, and their interaction. New insight into the role of inflammasome and synovial tissue macrophage subsets as predictors of drug response give hope for future tailored therapeutic strategies and a personalized medicine approach in inflammatory arthropathies. Here, we discuss the main pathogenetic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches towards precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis from the 2022 International GISEA/OEG Symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Vitale
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Research Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet’s Disease Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, SI, Italy
| | - Stefano Alivernini
- Immunology Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, RM, Italy
- Division of Rheumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, 20122 Milano, MI, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Research Center for Pediatric and Adult Rheumatic Diseases (RECAP.RD), University of Milan, 20122 Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Giulia Cassone
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Dario Bruno
- Immunology Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Luca Cantarini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Research Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet’s Disease Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, SI, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lopalco
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantations, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, BA, Italy
| | - Maurizio Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale A. Scuro, 37134 Verona, VR, Italy
| | - Fabiola Atzeni
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Experimental and Internal Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, ME, Italy
| | - Ennio Giulio Favalli
- Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, 20122 Milano, MI, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Research Center for Pediatric and Adult Rheumatic Diseases (RECAP.RD), University of Milan, 20122 Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Conti
- Lupus Clinic, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, RM, Italy
| | - Elisa Gremese
- Immunology Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, RM, Italy
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Florenzo Iannone
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantations, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, BA, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Lapadula
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Emergency Surgery and Organ Transplantations, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, BA, Italy
| | - Marco Sebastiani
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, MO, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alivernini S, Firestein GS, McInnes IB. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunity 2022; 55:2255-2270. [PMID: 36516818 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Significant recent progress in understanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis has led to improved treatment and quality of life. The introduction of targeted-biologic and -synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has also transformed clinical outcomes. Despite this, RA remains a life-long disease without a cure. Unmet needs include partial response and non-response to treatment in many patients, failure to achieve immune homeostasis or drug free remission, and inability to repair damaged tissues. RA is now recognized as the end of a multi-year prodromal phase in which systemic immune dysregulation, likely beginning in mucosal surfaces, is followed by a symptomatic clinical phase. Inflammation and immune reactivity are primarily localized to the synovium leading to pain and articular damage, but is also associated with a broader series of comorbidities. Here, we review recently described immunologic mechanisms that drive breach of tolerance, chronic synovitis, and remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Alivernini
- Immunology Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Division of Rheumatology - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gary S Firestein
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kurowska-Stolarska M, Alivernini S. Synovial tissue macrophages in joint homeostasis, rheumatoid arthritis and disease remission. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2022; 18:384-397. [PMID: 35672464 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00790-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Synovial tissue macrophages (STMs) were principally recognized as having a pro-inflammatory role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), serving as the main producers of pathogenic tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Recent advances in single-cell omics have facilitated the discovery of distinct STM populations, providing an atlas of discrete phenotypic clusters in the context of healthy and inflamed joints. Interrogation of the functions of distinct STM populations, via ex vivo and experimental mouse models, has re-defined our understanding of STM biology, opening up new opportunities to better understand the pathology of the arthritic joint. These works have identified STM subpopulations that form a protective lining barrier within the synovial membrane and actively participate in the remission of RA. We discuss how distinct functions of STM clusters shape the synovial tissue environment in health, during inflammation and in disease remission, as well as how an increased understanding of STM heterogeneity might aid the prediction of clinical outcomes and inform novel treatments for RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariola Kurowska-Stolarska
- Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis (RACE), Glasgow, UK.
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Stefano Alivernini
- Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis (RACE), Glasgow, UK.
- Division of Rheumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Division of Rheumatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
- Immunology Research Core Facility, Gemelli Science and Technology Park (GSTeP), Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Defining the Optimal Strategies for Achieving Drug-Free Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9121726. [PMID: 34946453 PMCID: PMC8701994 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is now accepted that the optimum treatment goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is sustained remission, as this has been shown to be associated with the best patient outcomes. There is little guidance on how to manage patients once remission is achieved; however, it is recommended that patients can taper therapy, with a view to discontinuing and achieving drug-free remission if treatment goals are maintained. This narrative review aims to present the current literature on drug-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis, with a view to identifying which strategies are best for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) tapering and to highlight areas of unmet clinical need. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature, which included research articles, meta-analyses and review papers. The key search terms included were rheumatoid arthritis, remission, drug-free remission, b-DMARDS/biologics, cs-DMARDS and tapering. The databases that were searched included PubMed and Google Scholar. For each article, the reference section of the paper was reviewed to find additional relevant articles. Results: It has been demonstrated that DFR is possible in a proportion of RA patients achieving clinically defined remission (both on cs and b-DMARDS). Immunological, imaging and clinical associations with/predictors of DFR have all been identified, including the presence of autoantibodies, absence of Power Doppler (PD) signal on ultrasound (US), lower disease activity according to composite scores of disease activity and lower patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) at treatment cessation. Conclusions: DFR in RA may be an achievable goal in certain patients. This carries importance in reducing medication-induced side-effects and potential toxicity, the burden of taking treatment if not required and cost effectiveness, specifically for biologic therapy. Prospective studies of objective biomarkers will help facilitate the prediction of successful treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Oliveira Ramos F, Rodrigues A, Magalhaes Martins F, Melo AT, Aguiar F, Brites L, Azevedo S, Duarte AC, Furtado C, Mourão AF, Sequeira G, Cunha I, Figueira R, Melo Gomes JA, Santos MJ, Fonseca JE. Health-related quality of life and disability in adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: comparison with adult-onset rheumatic diseases. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001766. [PMID: 34819385 PMCID: PMC8614144 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare physical disability, mental health, fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) categories in adulthood and between JIA and adult-onset rheumatic diseases. Methods Cross-sectional analysis nested in a cohort of adult patients with JIA registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt). Physical disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire—Disability Index), mental health symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F)) and HRQoL (EuroQol-5D (EQ5D) and Short Form (SF-36)) were compared across JIA categories. Patients with polyarticular JIA and enthesis-related arthritis (ERA) JIA were compared respectively to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA), matched for gender and age, adjusted for disease duration and activity. Results 585 adult patients with JIA were included. Comparison across JIA categories showed that persistent oligoarthritis and patients with ERA reported a higher score in EQ5D and SF-36 physical component when compared with other JIA categories. Polyarticular JIA reported less disability and fatigue than patients with RA (median Health Assessment Questionnaire of 0.25 vs 0.63; p<0.001 and median FACIT-F score 42 vs 40; p=0.041). Polyarticular JIA had also better scores on EQ5D and all domains of SF-36, than patients with RA. Patients with ERA reported less depression and anxiety symptoms (0% vs 14.8%; p=0.003% and 9% vs 21.3%; p=0.002) and less fatigue symptoms (45 vs 41; p=0.01) than patients with SpA. Conclusion Persistent oligoarticular JIA and ERA are the JIA categories in adulthood with better HRQoL. Overall, adult polyarticular and patients with ERA JIA have lower functional impairment and better quality-of-life than patients with RA and SpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Oliveira Ramos
- Rheumatology Department and Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal .,Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Rodrigues
- Centre for Chronic Diseases (CEDOC), CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Teresa Melo
- Rheumatology Department and Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Francisca Aguiar
- Young Adult and Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luisa Brites
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Soraia Azevedo
- Rheumatology, Unidade Local de Saude do Alto Minho EPE, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
| | | | - Carolina Furtado
- Rheumatology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, São Miguel, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Ana Filipa Mourão
- Centre for Chronic Diseases (CEDOC), CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal.,Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Graça Sequeira
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Inês Cunha
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga EPE, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Figueira
- Rheumatology, Hospital Dr. Nélio Mendonça, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Jose Santos
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisboa, Portugal.,Rheumatology, Hospital Garcia de Orta EPE, Almada, Portugal
| | - Joao Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Department and Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal.,Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Luurssen-Masurel N, van Mulligen E, Weel-Koenders AEAM, Hazes JMW, de Jong PHP. The susceptibility of attaining and maintaining DMARD-free remission in different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:keab631. [PMID: 34352094 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare (sustained) DMARD-free remission rates((S)DFR), defined as respectively ≥6 months and >1 year, after 2 and 5 years between three clinical arthritis phenotypes; undifferentiated arthritis(UA), autoantibody-negative(RA-) and positive rheumatoid arthritis(RA+). METHODS All UA(n = 130), RA-(n = 176) and RA + (n = 331) patients from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, were used. (S)DFR comparisons between phenotypes after 2 and 5 years were performed with Logistic regression. Medication use and early and late flares(DAS ≥ 2.4), respectively defined as < 12 and >12 months after reaching DFR, were also compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate potential predictors for (S)DFR. RESULTS Within 2 and 5 years less DFR was seen in RA + (17.2-25.7%), followed by RA-(28.4-42.1%) and UA patients(43.1-58.5%). This also applied for SDFR within 2 and 5 years (respectively 7.6% and 21.4%; 20.5% and 38.1%; and 35.4% and 55.4%). A flare during tapering was seen in 22.7% of patients. Of the patients in DFR 7.5% had an early flare and 3.4% a late flare. Also more treatment intensifications occurred in RA+ compared with RA- and UA. We found that higher baseline DAS, ACPA positivity, BMI and smoking were negatively associated with (S)DFR, while clinical phenotype(reference RA+), short symptom duration(<6 months) and remission within 6 months were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS (Long-term) clinical outcomes differ between undifferentiated arthritis, autoantibody-negative and positive rheumatoid arthritis(RA). These data reconfirm that RA can be subdivided into aforementioned clinical phenotypes and that treatment might be stratified upon these phenotypes, although validation is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, https://www.isrctn.com/, ISRCTN26791028.
Collapse
|
14
|
Luurssen-Masurel N, Weel AEAM, Hazes JMW, de Jong PHP. The impact of different (rheumatoid) arthritis phenotypes on patients' lives. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:3716-3726. [PMID: 33237330 PMCID: PMC8328508 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains between three arthritis phenotypes [undifferentiated arthritis (UA), autoantibody-negative RA (RA−) and autoantibody-positive RA (RA+)] at diagnosis, after 2 years and over time. Methods All UA (n = 130), RA− (n = 176) and RA+ (n = 331) patients from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, were used. PRO comparisons between phenotypes at baseline and after 2 years were performed with analysis of variance, while a linear mixed model compared them over time. Effect sizes were weighted against the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each PRO. Results RA− patients had a higher disease burden compared with RA+ and UA. At baseline and after 2 years, RA− patients had more functional impairment and a poorer Physical Component Summary (PCS) compared with the other phenotypes, while they only scored worse for general health and morning stiffness duration at baseline. The MCIDs were exceeded at baseline, except for functional ability between RA+ and UA, while after 2 years only the MCID of the PCS was exceeded by RA− compared with UA and RA. After 2 years the PROs of all phenotypes improved, but PROs measuring functioning were still worse compared with the general population, even when patients had low disease activity. Conclusion RA− patients had the highest disease burden of all phenotypes. Although most patients have low disease activity after treatment, all clinical phenotypes still have a similar significant impact on patients’ lives, which is mainly physical. Therefore it is important to assess and address PROs in daily practice because of persistent disease burden despite low disease activity. Trial registration ISRCTN26791028.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelique Elisabeth Adriana Maria Weel
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Luurssen-Masurel N, Weel AEAM, Koc GH, Hazes JMW, de Jong PHP. The number of risk factors for persistent disease determines the clinical course of early arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:3617-3627. [PMID: 33484138 PMCID: PMC8328505 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Management of early arthritis is based upon early recognition of individuals at high risk of developing persistent arthritis. Therefore, this study investigates whether the number of risk factors for persistent disease or treatment determines the clinical course of early arthritis by comparing the chance at (sustained) DMARD-free remission ((S)DFR) after 2 years follow-up. Methods Data from the tREACH trial, a stratified single-blinded multicentre strategy trial with a treat-to-target approach were used. We selected all patients with ≥1 swollen joint who did not fulfil 1987 and/or 2010 criteria for RA. The number of risk factors present; autoantibody-positivity, polyarthritis (>4), erosive disease and elevated acute phase reactants, determined risk group stratification. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with (S)DFR as dependent variables and baseline disease activity score (DAS), treatment, symptom duration and number of risk factors present as independent variables. Results In total, 130 early arthritis patients were included and respectively 31, 66 and 33 had 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors present. DFR rates were respectively 74%, 48% and 45% for early arthritis patients with 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors present. In accordance SDFR rates were 61%, 32% and 30%. In our logistic model (S)DFR was not influenced by the initial treatment strategies when stratified for risk groups. Conclusion The chance at (S)DFR in early arthritis diminishes when more risk factors are present, which is irrespective of the given initial treatment. Our data point out to a stratified management approach in early arthritis based on their risk profile, but validation is needed. Trial registration ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN26791028 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN26791028).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A E A M Weel
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G H Koc
- Department of Internal Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - J M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P H P de Jong
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Edington FLB, Gadellha SR, Santiago MB. Safety of treatment with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine: A ten-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med 2021; 88:63-72. [PMID: 33832827 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of adverse events (AE) in chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine users. METHODS We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), using MEDLINE (2010-2020) and EMBASE (2010-2020) databases, reporting AE in chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine users during treatment for lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, malaria and COVID-19. The protocol for this systematic review is registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42020197938). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-Bias tool and relevant data were extracted though a customized data collection form, independently, by two authors. The IRR of AE was estimated using a random-effect model meta-analysis and heterogeneity was evaluated by T2 and I2. Subgroup analysis was performed, and publication bias was assessed by funnel-plot. RESULTS Forty-six RCTs met our eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis (23132 patients). There was not a single death attributed to chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine use in the included RCTs. The IRR of general AE during antimalarial use was 1.15 [CI 95% 1.01-1.31]. COVID-19 patients treated with either antimalarial presented an 83% and 165% higher risk of developing general and gastrointestinal AE, respectively, in comparison with controls. The use of antimalarial increased the risk of developing dermatological AE by 92% in malarial studies and reduced by 65% in lupus studies. We did not find a significatively higher risk of cardiovascular nor ophthalmological AE in antimalarial users. CONCLUSIONS Our data reinforces that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have a good safety profile though caution is advised when using higher than usual doses in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Luiz Barros Edington
- Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Källmark H, Einarsson JT, Nilsson J, Olofsson T, Saxne T, Geborek P, C. Kapetanovic M. Sustained Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Triple Therapy Compared to Biologic Therapy: A Swedish Nationwide Register Study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:1135-1144. [DOI: 10.1002/art.41720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Källmark
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
| | | | | | - Tor Olofsson
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
| | - Tore Saxne
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
| | - Pierre Geborek
- Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amkreutz JAMP, de Moel EC, Theander L, Willim M, Heimans L, Nilsson JÅ, Karlsson MK, Huizinga TWJ, Åkesson KE, Jacobsson LTH, Allaart CF, Turesson C, van der Woude D. Association Between Bone Mineral Density and Autoantibodies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:921-930. [PMID: 33314699 PMCID: PMC8251600 DOI: 10.1002/art.41623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Autoantibodies, such as anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), have been described as inducing bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which can also be reflected by bone mineral density (BMD). We therefore examined the association between osteoporosis and autoantibodies in two independent RA cohorts. Methods Dual x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and left hip was performed in 408 Dutch patients with early RA during 5 years of follow‐up and in 198 Swedish patients with early RA during 10 years of follow‐up. The longitudinal effect of ACPAs and other autoantibodies on several BMD measures was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results In the Dutch cohort, significantly lower BMD at baseline was observed in ACPA‐positive patients compared to ACPA‐negative patients, with an estimated marginal mean BMD in the left hip of 0.92 g/cm2 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.91–0.93) versus 0.95 g/cm2 (95% CI 0.93–0.97) (P = 0.01). In line with this, significantly lower Z scores at baseline were noted in the ACPA‐positive group compared to the ACPA‐negative group (estimated marginal mean Z score in the left hip of 0.18 [95% CI 0.08–0.29] versus 0.48 [95% CI 0.33–0.63]) (P < 0.01). However, despite clear differences at baseline, ACPA positivity was not associated with greater decrease in absolute BMD or Z scores over time. Furthermore, there was no association between BMD and higher levels of ACPAs or other autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor and anti–carbamylated protein antibodies). In the Swedish cohort, ACPA‐positive patients tended to have a higher prevalence of osteopenia at baseline (P = 0.04), but again, ACPA positivity was not associated with an increased prevalence of osteopenia or osteoporosis over time. Conclusion The presence of ACPAs is associated with significantly lower BMD at baseline, but not with greater BMD loss over time in treated RA patients. These results suggest that ACPAs alone do not appear to contribute to bone loss after disease onset when disease activity is well‐managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma C de Moel
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Minna Willim
- Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lotte Heimans
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Åke Nilsson
- Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carl Turesson
- Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baker KF, Sim JPX, Isaacs JD. Biomarkers of tolerance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a new era in clinical management? THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2021; 3:e371-e382. [PMID: 38279392 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00069-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Modern therapeutic agents and treatment regimens have made sustained remission an attainable target for many patients across a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, albeit at the risk of adverse events and the expense of drug prescription and safety monitoring. Clinicians and patients are thus increasingly faced with a novel treatment dilemma: whether and how best to stop immunomodulatory treatment in patients who achieve remission. In this final paper in a Series on therapeutic tolerance induction, we summarise our current knowledge of biomarkers of immune homeostasis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and their application to the prediction and attainment of sustained drug-free remission. We summarise evidence from prospective studies of immunomodulatory drug cessation across a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We also consider current evidence for clinical, serological, proteomic, metabolomic, cellular, and microbiomic biomarkers of immune homeostasis. Finally, we discuss the steps necessary for clinical translation of these biomarkers, as well as the potential transformative effect of these biomarkers on management of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases if clinical translation is successfully achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth F Baker
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jasmine P X Sim
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John D Isaacs
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Narváez J, Otón T, Calvo-Alén J, Escudero-Contreras A, Muñoz-Fernández S, Rodríguez-Heredia JM, Romero-Yuste S, Vela-Casasempere P, Luján S, Baquero JL, Carmona L. Influence of prognosis factors on the prescription of targeted treatments in rheumatoid arthritis: A Delphi survey. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 88:105172. [PMID: 33689842 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore current evidence on the management of poor prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate whether this evidence is taken into account by clinicians when deciding on treatment in daily clinical practice. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to analyse the effects of currently available biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on the classically accepted poor prognostic factors of RA. All randomized controlled trials reporting subgroup analyses about effects on prognostic factors were identified and synthesized. In a second phase, a two-round Delphi survey was carried out to contrast the SLR results with the grade of agreement of a large group of rheumatologists about the effectiveness of each drug class on each prognostic factor. RESULTS According to the Delphi results, the only prognostic factor that significantly influenced the selection of treatment was the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), being the preferred treatment in this scenario abatacept or rituximab. The rest of the poor prognostic factors (including high disease activity at baseline, disability as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire index, seropositivity, elevated acute-phase reactants, and evidence of erosions based on plain radiography or ultrasonography) did not seem to significantly influence rheumatologists when choosing a treatment. The results of the SLR results did not show solid evidence regarding the use of any specific therapy in the management of patients with specific poor factors, except in the case of RA-ILD, although the data in the literature in this regard are not free of bias. CONCLUSIONS The only prognostic factor that seems to significantly influence the selection of treatment is the presence of RA-ILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teresa Otón
- Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (InMusc), Calle Ofelia Nieto, 10, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Escudero-Contreras
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Sara Luján
- Medical Department, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Loreto Carmona
- Instituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (InMusc), Calle Ofelia Nieto, 10, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Verstappen M, Niemantsverdriet E, Matthijssen XME, le Cessie S, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Early DAS response after DMARD-start increases probability of achieving sustained DMARD-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:276. [PMID: 33228814 PMCID: PMC7684730 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02368-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sustained DMARD-free remission (SDFR) is increasingly achievable. The pathogenesis underlying SDFR development is unknown and patient characteristics at diagnosis poorly explain whether SDFR will be achieved. To increase the understanding, we studied the course of disease activity scores (DAS) over time in relation to SDFR development. Subsequently, we explored whether DAS course could be helpful identifying RA patients likely to achieve SDFR. Methods 772 consecutive RA patients, promptly treated with csDMARDs (mostly methotrexate and treat-to-target treatment adjustments), were studied for SDFR development (absence of synovitis, persisting minimally 12 months after DMARD stop). The course of disease activity scores (DAS) was compared between RA patients with and without SDFR development within 7 years, using linear mixed models, stratified for ACPA. The relation between 4-month DAS and the probability of SDFR development was studied with logistic regression. Cumulative incidence of SDFR within DAS categories (< 1.6, 1.6–2.4, 2.4–3.6, ≥ 3.6) at 4 months was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results In ACPA-negative RA patients, those achieving SDFR showed a remarkably stronger DAS decline within the first 4 months, compared to RA patients without SDFR; − 1.73 units (95%CI, 1.28–2.18) versus − 1.07 units (95%CI, 0.90–1.23) (p < 0.001). In APCA-positive RA patients, such an effect was not observed, yet SDFR prevalence in this group was low. In ACPA-negative RA, DAS decline in the first 4 months and absolute DAS levels at 4 months (DAS4 months) were equally predictive for SDFR development. Incidence of SDFR in ACPA-negative RA patients was high (70.2%) when DAS4 months was < 1.6, whilst SDFR was rare (7.1%) when DAS4 months was ≥ 3.6. Conclusions In ACPA-negative RA, an early response to treatment, i.e., a strong DAS decline within the first 4 months, is associated with a higher probability of SDFR development. DAS values at 4 months could be useful for later decisions to stop DMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Verstappen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - E Niemantsverdriet
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - X M E Matthijssen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S le Cessie
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Michielsens CAJ, Boers N, den Broeder N, Wenink MH, van der Maas A, Mahler EAM, Mulder MLM, van der Heijde D, van den Hoogen FHJ, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. Dose reduction and withdrawal strategy for TNF-inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: design of a pragmatic open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Trials 2020; 21:90. [PMID: 31941544 PMCID: PMC6964104 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-4000-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in the treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), including psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, these drugs come with some disadvantages such as adverse events, practical burden for patients and high costs. Dose optimisation of TNFi after patients have reached low disease activity (LDA) has been shown feasible and safe in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on TNFi dose optimisation in PsA and axSpA are scarce, especially pragmatic, randomised strategy studies. METHODS We developed an investigator-driven, pragmatic, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial (DRESS-PS) to compare the effects of a disease activity-guided treat-to-target strategy with or without a tapering attempt in patients with SpA (PsA and axSpA combined), ≥ 16 years of age, who are being treated with TNFi, and have had at least 6 months of low disease activity. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients in LDA after 12 months of follow up. Patients are assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow up. Bayesian power analyses with a weakened prior based on a similar study performed in RA resulted in a sample size of 95 patients in total. DISCUSSION More knowledge on disease activity-guided treatment algorithms would contribute to better treatment choices and cost savings and potentially decrease the risk of side effects. In this article we elucidate some of our design choices on TNFi dose optimisation and its clinical and methodological consequences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register, NL6771. Registered on 27 November 2018 (CMO NL66181.091.18, 23 October 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia A J Michielsens
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nadine Boers
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark H Wenink
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elien A M Mahler
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle L M Mulder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank H J van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Meyer MK, Andersen M, Ring T, Andersen GN, Ehlers LH, Rasmussen C, Stensballe A. Personalized rheumatic medicine through dose reduction reduces the cost of biological treatment – a retrospective intervention analysis. Scand J Rheumatol 2019; 48:398-407. [DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1585940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- MK Meyer
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - M Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - T Ring
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - GN Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
| | - LH Ehlers
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - C Rasmussen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark
- Center for Clinical Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Health Economics and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A Stensballe
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJF, van der Maas A, Vriezekolk JE, Hulscher ME, van den Hoogen FHJ, Jacobs WCH, van Herwaarden N, den Broeder AA. Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD010455. [PMID: 31125448 PMCID: PMC6534285 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010455.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in treating people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but are associated with (dose-dependent) adverse effects and high costs. To prevent overtreatment, several trials have assessed the effectiveness of down-titration compared with continuation of the standard dose. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2014. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, or disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents on disease activity, functioning, costs, safety, and radiographic damage compared with usual care in people with RA and low disease activity. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL (29 March 2018) and four trial registries (11 April 2018) together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We screened conference proceedings (American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism 2005-2017). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) to usual care/no down-titration in people with RA and low disease activity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS One previously included trial was excluded retrospectively in this update because it was not an RCT/CCT. We included eight additional trials, for a total of 14 studies (13 RCTs and one CCT, 3315 participants in total) reporting anti-TNF down-titration. Six studies (1148 participants) reported anti-TNF dose reduction compared with anti-TNF continuation. Eight studies (2111 participants) reported anti-TNF discontinuation compared with anti-TNF continuation (three studies assessed both anti-TNF discontinuation and dose reduction), and three studies assessed disease activity-guided anti-TNF dose tapering (365 participants). These studies included data on all anti-TNF agents, but primarily adalimumab and etanercept. Thirteen studies were available in full text, one was available as abstract. We assessed the included studies generally at low to moderate risk of bias; our main concerns were bias due to open-label treatment and unblinded outcome assessment. Clinical heterogeneity between the trials was high. The included studies were performed at clinical centres around the world and included people with early as well as established RA, the majority of whom were female with mean ages between 47 and 60. Study durations ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years.We found that anti-TNF dose reduction leads to little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 26 to 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, mean difference (MD) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.24, absolute risk difference (ARD) 1%) compared with continuation. Also, anti-TNF dose reduction does not result in an important deterioration in function after 26 to 52 weeks (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) (high-certainty evidence, MD 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.19, ARD 3%). Next to this, anti-TNF dose reduction may slightly reduce the proportion of participants switched to another biologic (low-certainty evidence), but probably slightly increases the proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, risk ratio (RR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.95, ARD 2% higher). Anti-TNF dose reduction may cause little or no difference in serious adverse events, withdrawals due to adverse events and proportion of participants with persistent remission (low-certainty evidence).Results show that anti-TNF discontinuation probably slightly increases the mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 28 to 52 weeks (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.25, ARD 14%), and that the RR of persistent remission lies between 0.16 and 0.77 (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF discontinuation increases the proportion participants with minimal radiographic progression after 52 weeks (high-certainty evidence, RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.59, ARD 7%) and may lead to a slight deterioration in function (HAQ-DI) (low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-TNF discontinuation influences the number of serious adverse events (due to very low-certainty evidence) and the number of withdrawals due to adverse events after 28 to 52 weeks probably increases slightly (moderate-certainty evidence, RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.84, ARD 1% higher).Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may result in little or no difference in mean disease activity score (DAS28) after 72 to 78 weeks (low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering results in little or no difference in the proportion of participants with persistent remission after 18 months (high-certainty evidence, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06, ARD -9%) and may result in little or no difference in switching to another biologic (low-certainty evidence). Anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering may slightly increase proportion of participants with minimal radiographic progression (low-certainty evidence) and probably leads to a slight deterioration of function after 18 months (moderate-certainty evidence, MD 0.2 higher, 0.02 lower to 0.42 higher, ARD 7% higher), It is uncertain whether anti-TNF disease activity-guided dose tapering influences the number of serious adverse events due to very low-certainty evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found that fixed-dose reduction of anti-TNF, after at least three to 12 months of low disease activity, is comparable to continuation of the standard dose regarding disease activity and function, and may be comparable with regards to the proportion of participants with persistent remission. Discontinuation (also without disease activity-guided adaptation) of anti-TNF is probably inferior to continuation of treatment with respect to disease activity, the proportion of participants with persistent remission, function, and minimal radiographic damage. Disease activity-guided dose tapering of anti-TNF is comparable to continuation of treatment with respect to the proportion of participants with persistent remission and may be comparable regarding disease activity.Caveats of this review are that available data are mainly limited to etanercept and adalimumab, the heterogeneity between studies, and the use of superiority instead of non-inferiority designs.Future research should focus on the anti-TNF agents infliximab and golimumab; assessment of disease activity, function, and radiographic outcomes after longer follow-up; and assessment of long-term safety, cost-effectiveness, and predictors for successful down-titration. Also, use of a validated flare criterion, non-inferiority designs, and disease activity-guided tapering instead of fixed-dose reduction or discontinuation would allow researchers to better interpret study findings and generalise to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise M Verhoef
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Bart JF van den Bemt
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of PharmacyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6522JV
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PharmacyNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Marlies E Hulscher
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical CenterIQ healthcarePO Box 9101117 KWAZONijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | - Frank HJ van den Hoogen
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of RheumatologyNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Wilco CH Jacobs
- The Health ScientistFraeylemastraat 13The HagueNetherlands2532 TX
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Sint MaartenskliniekDepartment of RheumatologyHengstdal 3NijmegenGelderlandNetherlands6574 NA
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of RheumatologyNijmegenNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Update of the Mexican College of Rheumatology Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 2018. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 17:215-228. [PMID: 31103432 DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Therapeutic advances in rheumatoid arthritis require periodic review of treatment guidelines. OBJECTIVE To update the Mexican College of Rheumatology guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHOD Board certified rheumatologists from different health institutions and regions of the country participated. Work teams were formed that reviewed the previous guidelines, elaborated new questions, reviewed the literature, and scored the evidence that was presented and discussed in plenary session. The conclusions were presented to infectologists, gynaecologists and patients. Recommendations were based on levels of evidence according to GRADE methodology. RESULTS Updated recommendations on the use of available medications for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in Mexico up to 2017 are presented. The importance of adequate and sustained control of the disease is emphasized and relevant safety aspects are described. Bioethical conflicts are included, and government action is invited to strengthen correct treatment of the disease. CONCLUSIONS The updated recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology on the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis incorporate the best available information to be used in the Mexican health care system.
Collapse
|
26
|
Burgers LE, van der Pol JA, Huizinga TWJ, Allaart CF, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Does treatment strategy influence the ability to achieve and sustain DMARD-free remission in patients with RA? Results of an observational study comparing an intensified DAS-steered treatment strategy with treat to target in routine care. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21:115. [PMID: 31064384 PMCID: PMC6505077 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-019-1893-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the impact of treatment strategy on achieving and sustaining disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-free remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Two hundred seventy-nine RA patients (median follow-up 7.8 years) were studied. Of these, 155 patients participated in a disease activity score (DAS) < 1.6 steered trial aimed at DMARD-free remission. Initial treatment comprised methotrexate with high-dose prednisone (60 mg/day) and a possibility to start biologicals after 4 months. In the same period and hospital, 124 patients were treated according to routine care, comprising DAS < 2.4 steered treatment. Percentages of DMARD-free remission (absence of synovitis for ≥ 1 year after DMARD cessation), late flares (recurrence of clinical synovitis ≥ 1 year after DMARD cessation), and DMARD-free sustained remission (DMARD-free remission sustained during complete follow-up) were compared between both treatment strategies. RESULTS Patients receiving intensive treatment were younger and more often ACPA-positive. On a group level, there was no significant association between intensive treatment and DMARD-free remission (35% vs 29%, corrected hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 95%CI 0.9-2.2), nor in ACPA-negative RA (49% versus 44%). In ACPA-positive RA intensive treatment resulted in more DMARD-free remission (25% vs 6%, corrected HR 4.9, 95%CI 1.4-17). Intensive treatment was associated with more late flares (20% versus 8%, HR 2.3, 95%CI 0.6-8.3). Subsequently, there was no difference in DMARD-free sustained remission on a group level (28% versus 27%), nor in the ACPA-negative (43% versus 42%) or ACPA-positive stratum (17% versus 6%, corrected HR 3.1, 95%CI 0.9-11). CONCLUSIONS Intensive treatment did not result in more DMARD-free sustained remission, compared to routine up-to-date care. The data showed a tendency towards an effect of intensive treatment in ACPA-positive RA; this needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E Burgers
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C-01-046, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - J A van der Pol
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C-01-046, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - T W J Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C-01-046, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C-01-046, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C-01-046, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shahin AA, Moghazy AKA, Hamed WE. Assessment of long-term articular damage and function in rheumatoid arthritis patients. THE EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejr.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Hissink Muller P, Brinkman DMC, Schonenberg-Meinema D, van den Bosch WB, Koopman-Keemink Y, Brederije ICJ, Bekkering PW, Kuijpers TW, Van Rossum M, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, van den Berg JM, Boehringer S, Allaart CF, Ten Cate R. Treat to target (drug-free) inactive disease in DMARD-naive juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 24-month clinical outcomes of a three-armed randomised trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 78:51-59. [PMID: 30309970 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION Which is the best strategy to achieve (drug-free) inactive disease in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)? METHODS In a randomised, single-blinded, study in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with JIA, three treatment-strategies were compared: (1) sequential DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine or methotrexate (MTX)), (2) combination therapy MTX + 6 weeks prednisolone and (3) combination therapy MTX +etanercept. Treatment-to-target entailed 3-monthly DMARD/biological adjustments in case of persistent disease activity, with drug tapering to nil in case of inactive disease.After 24 months, primary outcomes were time-to-inactive-disease and time-to-flare after DMARD discontinuation. Secondary outcomes were adapted ACRPedi30/50/70/90 scores, functional ability and adverse events. RESULTS 94 children (67 % girls) aged median (IQR) 9.1 (4.6-12.9) years were enrolled: 32 in arms 1 and 2, 30 in arm 3. At baseline visual analogue scale (VAS) physician was mean 49 (SD 16) mm, VAS patient 53 (22) mm, erythrocyte sedimentation rate 12.8 (14.7), active joints median 8 (5-12), limited joints 2.5 (1-4.8) and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire score mean 1.0 (0.6).After 24 months, 71% (arm 1), 70% (arm 2) and 72% (arm 3) of patients had inactive disease and 45% (arm 1), 31% (arm 2) and 41% (arm 3) had drug-free inactive disease. Time-to-inactive-disease was median 9.0 (5.3-15.0) months in arm 1, 9.0 (6.0-12.8) months in arm 2 and 9.0 (6.0-12.0) months in arm 3 (p=0.30). Time-to-flare was not significantly different (overall 3.0 (3.0-6.8) months, p=0.7). Adapted ACR pedi-scores were comparably high between arms. Adverse events were similar. CONCLUSION Regardless of initial specific treatments, after 24 months of treatment-to-target aimed at drug-free inactive disease, 71% of recent-onset patients with JIA had inactive disease (median onset 9 months) and 39% were drug free. Tightly controlled treatment-to-target is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 1574.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Hissink Muller
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands .,Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle M C Brinkman
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatrics, Alrijne Hospital Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema
- Department of Paediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Yvonne Koopman-Keemink
- Department of Paediatrics, Hagaziekenhuis Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel C J Brederije
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter W Bekkering
- Princess Máxima Center, Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Taco W Kuijpers
- Department of Paediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Van Rossum
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology, Immunology Center Reade Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Merlijn van den Berg
- Department of Paediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Boehringer
- Department of Biostatistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Ten Cate
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Moel EC, Derksen VFAM, Trouw LA, Bang H, Goekoop-Ruiterman YPM, Steup-Beekman GM, Huizinga TWJ, Allaart CF, Toes REM, van der Woude D. In RA, becoming seronegative over the first year of treatment does not translate to better chances of drug-free remission. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:1836-1838. [PMID: 30045852 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C de Moel
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle F A M Derksen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leendert A Trouw
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gerda M Steup-Beekman
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Tom W J Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - René E M Toes
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diane van der Woude
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chiba M, Tsuji T, Nakane K, Tsuda S, Ishii H, Ohno H, Watanabe K, Ito M, Komatsu M, Sugawara T. Induction with Infliximab and a Plant-Based Diet as First-Line (IPF) Therapy for Crohn Disease: A Single-Group Trial. Perm J 2018; 21:17-009. [PMID: 29035182 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/17-009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 30% of patients with Crohn disease (CD) are unresponsive to biologics. No previous study has focused on a plant-based diet in an induction phase of CD treatment. OBJECTIVE To investigate the remission rate of infliximab combined with a plant-based diet as first-line (IPF) therapy for CD. METHODS This was a prospective single-group trial conducted at tertiary hospitals. Subjects included consecutive adults with a new diagnosis (n = 26), children with a new diagnosis (n = 11), and relapsing adults (n = 9) with CD who were naïve to treatment with biologics. Patients were admitted and administered a standard induction therapy with infliximab (5 mg/kg; 3 infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks). Additionally, they received a lacto-ovo-semivegetarian diet. The primary end point was remission, defined as the disappearance of active CD symptoms at week 6. Secondary end points were Crohn Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, and mucosal healing. RESULTS Two adults with a new diagnosis were withdrawn from the treatment protocol because of intestinal obstruction. The remission rates by the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were 96% (44/46) and 100% (44/44), respectively. Mean CDAI score (314) on admission decreased to 63 at week 6 (p < 0.0001). Mean CRP level on admission (5.3 mg/dL) decreased to 0.2 (p < 0.0001). Mucosal healing was achieved in 46% (19/41) of cases. CONCLUSION IPF therapy can induce remission in most patients with CD who are naïve to biologics regardless of age or whether they have a new diagnosis or relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuro Chiba
- Chief of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Section at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Tsuyotoshi Tsuji
- Chief of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Section at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Kunio Nakane
- Chief of the Gastroenterology Division at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Satoko Tsuda
- Gastroenterologist at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Hajime Ishii
- Gastroenterologist at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Hideo Ohno
- Gastroenterologist at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | | | - Mai Ito
- Gastroenterologist at Akita City Hospital in Japan.
| | - Masafumi Komatsu
- Gastroenterologist and the Director of Akita City Hospital, in Japan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bykerk VP. Rheumatoid arthritis: Moving towards IMPROVED drug-free remission. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018; 14:191-192. [PMID: 29559711 DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian P Bykerk
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,The Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Moel EC, Derksen VFAM, Stoeken G, Trouw LA, Bang H, Goekoop RJ, Speyer I, Huizinga TWJ, Allaart CF, Toes REM, van der Woude D. Baseline autoantibody profile in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with early treatment response but not long-term outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20:33. [PMID: 29482627 PMCID: PMC5828136 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1520-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The autoantibody profile of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is very diverse and consists of various isotypes and antibodies to multiple post-translational modifications. It is yet unknown whether this varying breadth of the autoantibody profile is associated with treatment outcomes. Therefore, we investigated whether the composition of the autoantibody profile in RA, as a marker of the underlying immunopathology, influences initial and long-term treatment outcomes. Methods In serum from 399 seropositive patients with RA in the IMPROVED study, drawn at baseline and at the moment of drug tapering, we measured IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 and anti‐carbamylated protein antibodies, IgM and IgA rheumatoid factor, and reactivity against four citrullinated and two acetylated peptides (anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs)). We investigated the effect of the breadth of the autoantibody profile on (1) change in disease activity score (DAS)44 between 0 and 4 months, (2) initial drug-free remission (DFR, drug-free DAS44 < 1.6) achieved between 1 and 2 years of follow up, and (3) long-term sustained DFR until last follow up. Results Patients with a broad autoantibody profile at baseline had a significantly better early treatment response: ΔDAS 0–4 months of 1–2, 3–4, and 5–6 vs 7–8 isotypes, -1.5 (p < 0.001), -1.7 (p = 0.03), and -1.8 (p = 0.04) vs -2.2. Similar results were observed for AMPA number. However, patients with a broad baseline autoantibody profile achieved less initial DFR. For long-term sustained DFR there was no longer an association with the breadth of the autoantibody response. When assessing autoantibodies at the moment of tapering, similar trends were observed. Conclusions A broad baseline autoantibody profile is associated with a better early treatment response. The breadth of the baseline autoantibody profile, reflecting a break in tolerance against several different autoantigens and extensive isotype switching, may indicate a more active humoral autoimmunity, which could make the underlying disease processes initially more suppressible by medication. The lack of association with long-term sustained DFR suggests that the relevance of the baseline autoantibody profile diminishes over time. Trial registration ISRCTN11916566. Registered on 7 November 2006. EudraCT, 2006- 06186-16. Registered on 16 July 2007. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1520-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C de Moel
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Gerrie Stoeken
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Irene Speyer
- Haaglanden Medical Center, the Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - René E M Toes
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Further Treatment Intensification in Undifferentiated and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Already in Low Disease Activity has Limited Benefit towards Physical Functioning. Arthritis Res Ther 2017; 19:220. [PMID: 28962586 PMCID: PMC5622576 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1425-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is recommended to optimise treatment as long as a predefined treatment target is not met, but should the aim be remission if patients are in low disease activity (LDA)? The aim of this study was to assess if, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) with Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 (LDA), treatment intensification results in better functional ability. METHODS In the IMPROVED study 610 patients with early RA or UA were treated with methotrexate + tapered high-dose prednisone. After 4 months, patients with DAS ≥ 1.6 were randomised to either of two treatment strategies. Patients with DAS < 1.6 tapered treatment. Over 5 years, patients with DAS ≥ 1.6 required treatment intensification, but protocol violations occurred, which allowed us to test the effect of treatment intensification regardless of subsequent DAS. A linear mixed model was used to test, in patients in LDA, the relationship between treatment intensification and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]) over time. RESULTS The number of patients in LDA per visit ranged from 88 to 146. Per visit, 27-74% of the patients in LDA had treatment intensification. We found a statistically significant effect of treatment intensification on ΔHAQ, corrected for baseline HAQ, age, sex and treatment strategy (β = -0.085, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.044). When ΔDAS was added, the effect of treatment intensification was partly explained by ΔDAS, and the association with HAQ was no longer statistically significant (β = -0.022, 95% CI -0.060 to 0.016). When the interaction between treatment intensification and time in follow-up was added, a statistically significant interaction was found (β = 0.0098, 95% CI 0.0010 to 0.019), indicating lesser improvement in HAQ after treatment intensification if follow-up time increased. CONCLUSIONS For patients with early RA and patients with UA already in LDA, further treatment intensification aimed at DAS remission does not result in meaningful functional improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, 11916566 . Registered on 28 December 2006. EudraCT, 2006-006186-16 . Registered on 16 July 2007.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ajeganova S, Huizinga T. Sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2017; 9:249-262. [PMID: 28974987 PMCID: PMC5613855 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x17720366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Sustained remission is an ultimate treatment goal in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Historically the frequency of sustained remission was low but the frequency of achieved sustained remission is increasing over time. The last years’ clinical studies of tight control targeted treatment and intervention trials of early use of intensive strategy suggest that these treatment strategies are associated with higher rates of sustained remission. Achievement of sustained remission, in particular but not limited to early sustained remission, can provide tapering and stopping disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). With new treatment strategies drug-free sustained remission is becoming an achievable goal. Sustained remission is associated with improved outcomes in regard to function, patient-reported outcomes and survival. Drug-free sustained remission is characterized by normalized function ability and survival. Sustained remission and, in particular, drug-free sustained remission offer hope that early identification of patients with arthritis, early improved novel treatments and treatment with target to achieve remission may potentially transform the progressive course of RA disease and disrupt RA chronicity. In this review we summarize the recent evidence on sustained remission in patients with RA, treatment strategies to achieve sustained remission, management of patients in sustained remission and significance of sustained remission from the patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Ajeganova
- Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Huizinga
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
bDMARD Dose Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search. Rheumatol Ther 2017; 4:1-24. [PMID: 28255897 PMCID: PMC5443724 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-017-0055-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although bDMARDs are effective in the treatment of RA, they are associated with dose-dependent side effects, patient burden, and high costs. Recently, many studies have investigated the possibility of discontinuing or tapering bDMARDs when patients have reached their treatment goal. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative overview of the existing evidence on bDMARD dose reduction and to provide answers to specific dose-reduction-related questions that are of interest to clinicians. Methods We systematically searched for relevant studies in four scientific databases. Furthermore, we screened the references of reviews and relevant studies. Results Our searches resulted in 45 original studies of bDMARD dose reduction in RA patients (15 RCTs and 30 observational studies). Current evidence shows that bDMARD dose reduction can be considered in all RA patients who achieve stable (e.g., ≥6 months) low disease activity or remission. The best strategies seem to be disease-activity-guided dose optimization and fixed dose reduction, since direct bDMARD discontinuation (without restarting) results in a high flare rate, worse physical functioning, and more joint damage. When tapering the bDMARD treatment of a patient, disease activity should be monitored closely, and if a flare occurs, the dose should be increased to the lowest effective dose. Current evidence shows that restarting bDMARD treatment is effective and safe. Unfortunately, no clear predictors of successful dose reduction have been identified so far. Conclusion The current evidence and rising healthcare costs urge that dose reduction should be considered for eligible patients. However, the decision to start dose reduction should be made in shared decision-making. Future research should focus not only on a better understanding of the effects of dose reduction on clinical outcomes but also on the perspectives of patients and physicians as well as the implementation of this new treatment principle. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-017-0055-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
36
|
Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, Carter A, Casey DC, Charlson FJ, Chen AZ, Coggeshall M, Cornaby L, Dandona L, Dicker DJ, Dilegge T, Erskine HE, Ferrari AJ, Fitzmaurice C, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Fullman N, Gething PW, Goldberg EM, Graetz N, Haagsma JA, Hay SI, Johnson CO, Kassebaum NJ, Kawashima T, Kemmer L, Khalil IA, Kinfu Y, Kyu HH, Leung J, Liang X, Lim SS, Lopez AD, Lozano R, Marczak L, Mensah GA, Mokdad AH, Naghavi M, Nguyen G, Nsoesie E, Olsen H, Pigott DM, Pinho C, Rankin Z, Reinig N, Salomon JA, Sandar L, Smith A, Stanaway J, Steiner C, Teeple S, Thomas BA, Troeger C, Wagner JA, Wang H, Wanga V, Whiteford HA, Zoeckler L, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, Abraham B, Abubakar I, Abu-Raddad LJ, Abu-Rmeileh NME, Ackerman IN, Adebiyi AO, Ademi Z, Adou AK, Afanvi KA, Agardh EE, Agarwal A, Kiadaliri AA, Ahmadieh H, Ajala ON, Akinyemi RO, Akseer N, Al-Aly Z, Alam K, Alam NKM, Aldhahri SF, Alegretti MA, Alemu ZA, Alexander LT, Alhabib S, Ali R, Alkerwi A, Alla F, Allebeck P, Al-Raddadi R, Alsharif U, Altirkawi KA, Alvis-Guzman N, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amini H, Ammar W, Amrock SM, Andersen HH, Anderson GM, Anderson BO, Antonio CAT, Aregay AF, Ärnlöv J, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Assadi R, Atique S, Avokpaho EFGA, Awasthi A, Quintanilla BPA, Azzopardi P, Bacha U, Badawi A, Balakrishnan K, Banerjee A, Barac A, Barker-Collo SL, Bärnighausen T, Barregard L, Barrero LH, Basu A, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Beghi E, Bell B, Bell ML, Bennett DA, Bensenor IM, Benzian H, Berhane A, Bernabé E, Betsu BD, Beyene AS, Bhala N, Bhatt S, Biadgilign S, Bienhoff K, Bikbov B, Biryukov S, Bisanzio D, Bjertness E, Blore J, Borschmann R, Boufous S, Brainin M, Brazinova A, Breitborde NJK, Brown J, Buchbinder R, Buckle GC, Butt ZA, Calabria B, Campos-Nonato IR, Campuzano JC, Carabin H, Cárdenas R, Carpenter DO, Carrero JJ, Castañeda-Orjuela CA, Rivas JC, Catalá-López F, Chang JC, Chiang PPC, Chibueze CE, Chisumpa VH, Choi JYJ, Chowdhury R, Christensen H, Christopher DJ, Ciobanu LG, Cirillo M, Coates MM, Colquhoun SM, Cooper C, Cortinovis M, Crump JA, Damtew SA, Dandona R, Daoud F, Dargan PI, das Neves J, Davey G, Davis AC, Leo DD, Degenhardt L, Gobbo LCD, Dellavalle RP, Deribe K, Deribew A, Derrett S, Jarlais DCD, Dharmaratne SD, Dhillon PK, Diaz-Torné C, Ding EL, Driscoll TR, Duan L, Dubey M, Duncan BB, Ebrahimi H, Ellenbogen RG, Elyazar I, Endres M, Endries AY, Ermakov SP, Eshrati B, Estep K, Farid TA, Farinha CSES, Faro A, Farvid MS, Farzadfar F, Feigin VL, Felson DT, Fereshtehnejad SM, Fernandes JG, Fernandes JC, Fischer F, Fitchett JRA, Foreman K, Fowkes FGR, Fox J, Franklin RC, Friedman J, Frostad J, Fürst T, Futran ND, Gabbe B, Ganguly P, Gankpé FG, Gebre T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gebremedhin AT, Geleijnse JM, Gessner BD, Gibney KB, Ginawi IAM, Giref AZ, Giroud M, Gishu MD, Giussani G, Glaser E, Godwin WW, Gomez-Dantes H, Gona P, Goodridge A, Gopalani SV, Gotay CC, Goto A, Gouda HN, Grainger R, Greaves F, Guillemin F, Guo Y, Gupta R, Gupta R, Gupta V, Gutiérrez RA, Haile D, Hailu AD, Hailu GB, Halasa YA, Hamadeh RR, Hamidi S, Hammami M, Hancock J, Handal AJ, Hankey GJ, Hao Y, Harb HL, Harikrishnan S, Haro JM, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Heredia-Pi IB, Heydarpour P, Hoek HW, Horino M, Horita N, Hosgood HD, Hoy DG, Htet AS, Huang H, Huang JJ, Huynh C, Iannarone M, Iburg KM, Innos K, Inoue M, Iyer VJ, Jacobsen KH, Jahanmehr N, Jakovljevic MB, Javanbakht M, Jayaraman SP, Jayatilleke AU, Jee SH, Jeemon P, Jensen PN, Jiang Y, Jibat T, Jimenez-Corona A, Jin Y, Jonas JB, Kabir Z, Kalkonde Y, Kamal R, Kan H, Karch A, Karema CK, Karimkhani C, Kasaeian A, Kaul A, Kawakami N, Keiyoro PN, Kemp AH, Keren A, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khan AR, Khan EA, Khang YH, Khera S, Khoja TAM, Khubchandani J, Kieling C, Kim P, Kim CI, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kissoon N, Knibbs LD, Knudsen AK, Kokubo Y, Kolte D, Kopec JA, Kosen S, Kotsakis GA, Koul PA, Koyanagi A, Kravchenko M, Defo BK, Bicer BK, Kudom AA, Kuipers EJ, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Kwan GF, Lal A, Lalloo R, Lallukka T, Lam H, Lam JO, Langan SM, Larsson A, Lavados PM, Leasher JL, Leigh J, Leung R, Levi M, Li Y, Li Y, Liang J, Liu S, Liu Y, Lloyd BK, Lo WD, Logroscino G, Looker KJ, Lotufo PA, Lunevicius R, Lyons RA, Mackay MT, Magdy M, Razek AE, Mahdavi M, Majdan M, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Marcenes W, Margolis DJ, Martinez-Raga J, Masiye F, Massano J, McGarvey ST, McGrath JJ, McKee M, McMahon BJ, Meaney PA, Mehari A, Mejia-Rodriguez F, Mekonnen AB, Melaku YA, Memiah P, Memish ZA, Mendoza W, Meretoja A, Meretoja TJ, Mhimbira FA, Millear A, Miller TR, Mills EJ, Mirarefin M, Mitchell PB, Mock CN, Mohammadi A, Mohammed S, Monasta L, Hernandez JCM, Montico M, Mooney MD, Moradi-Lakeh M, Morawska L, Mueller UO, Mullany E, Mumford JE, Murdoch ME, Nachega JB, Nagel G, Naheed A, Naldi L, Nangia V, Newton JN, Ng M, Ngalesoni FN, Nguyen QL, Nisar MI, Pete PMN, Nolla JM, Norheim OF, Norman RE, Norrving B, Nunes BP, Ogbo FA, Oh IH, Ohkubo T, Olivares PR, Olusanya BO, Olusanya JO, Ortiz A, Osman M, Ota E, PA M, Park EK, Parsaeian M, de Azeredo Passos VM, Caicedo AJP, Patten SB, Patton GC, Pereira DM, Perez-Padilla R, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Petzold M, Phillips MR, Piel FB, Pillay JD, Pishgar F, Plass D, Platts-Mills JA, Polinder S, Pond CD, Popova S, Poulton RG, Pourmalek F, Prabhakaran D, Prasad NM, Qorbani M, Rabiee RHS, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahimi K, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Rahman M, Rahman MHU, Rahman SU, Rai RK, Rajsic S, Ram U, Rao P, Refaat AH, Reitsma MB, Remuzzi G, Resnikoff S, Reynolds A, Ribeiro AL, Blancas MJR, Roba HS, Rojas-Rueda D, Ronfani L, Roshandel G, Roth GA, Rothenbacher D, Roy A, Sagar R, Sahathevan R, Sanabria JR, Sanchez-Niño MD, Santos IS, Santos JV, Sarmiento-Suarez R, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Savic M, Sawhney M, Schaub MP, Schmidt MI, Schneider IJC, Schöttker B, Schwebel DC, Scott JG, Seedat S, Sepanlou SG, Servan-Mori EE, Shackelford KA, Shaheen A, Shaikh MA, Sharma R, Sharma U, Shen J, Shepard DS, Sheth KN, Shibuya K, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Shrime MG, Sigfusdottir ID, Silva DAS, Silveira DGA, Singh A, Singh JA, Singh OP, Singh PK, Sivonda A, Skirbekk V, Skogen JC, Sligar A, Sliwa K, Soljak M, Søreide K, Sorensen RJD, Soriano JB, Sposato LA, Sreeramareddy CT, Stathopoulou V, Steel N, Stein DJ, Steiner TJ, Steinke S, Stovner L, Stroumpoulis K, Sunguya BF, Sur P, Swaminathan S, Sykes BL, Szoeke CEI, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Takala JS, Tandon N, Tanne D, Tavakkoli M, Taye B, Taylor HR, Ao BJT, Tedla BA, Terkawi AS, Thomson AJ, Thorne-Lyman AL, Thrift AG, Thurston GD, Tobe-Gai R, Tonelli M, Topor-Madry R, Topouzis F, Tran BX, Truelsen T, Dimbuene ZT, Tsilimbaris M, Tura AK, Tuzcu EM, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Undurraga EA, Uneke CJ, Uthman OA, van Gool CH, Varakin YY, Vasankari T, Venketasubramanian N, Verma RK, Violante FS, Vladimirov SK, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Wagner GR, Waller SG, Wang L, Watkins DA, Weichenthal S, Weiderpass E, Weintraub RG, Werdecker A, Westerman R, White RA, Williams HC, Wiysonge CS, Wolfe CDA, Won S, Woodbrook R, Wubshet M, Xavier D, Xu G, Yadav AK, Yan LL, Yano Y, Yaseri M, Ye P, Yebyo HG, Yip P, Yonemoto N, Yoon SJ, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zaki MES, Zeeb H, Zhou M, Zodpey S, Zuhlke LJ, Murray CJL. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388:1545-1602. [PMID: 27733282 PMCID: PMC5055577 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31678-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4522] [Impact Index Per Article: 565.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-fatal outcomes of disease and injury increasingly detract from the ability of the world's population to live in full health, a trend largely attributable to an epidemiological transition in many countries from causes affecting children, to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) more common in adults. For the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 (GBD 2015), we estimated the incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for diseases and injuries at the global, regional, and national scale over the period of 1990 to 2015. METHODS We estimated incidence and prevalence by age, sex, cause, year, and geography with a wide range of updated and standardised analytical procedures. Improvements from GBD 2013 included the addition of new data sources, updates to literature reviews for 85 causes, and the identification and inclusion of additional studies published up to November, 2015, to expand the database used for estimation of non-fatal outcomes to 60 900 unique data sources. Prevalence and incidence by cause and sequelae were determined with DisMod-MR 2.1, an improved version of the DisMod-MR Bayesian meta-regression tool first developed for GBD 2010 and GBD 2013. For some causes, we used alternative modelling strategies where the complexity of the disease was not suited to DisMod-MR 2.1 or where incidence and prevalence needed to be determined from other data. For GBD 2015 we created a summary indicator that combines measures of income per capita, educational attainment, and fertility (the Socio-demographic Index [SDI]) and used it to compare observed patterns of health loss to the expected pattern for countries or locations with similar SDI scores. FINDINGS We generated 9·3 billion estimates from the various combinations of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs for causes, sequelae, and impairments by age, sex, geography, and year. In 2015, two causes had acute incidences in excess of 1 billion: upper respiratory infections (17·2 billion, 95% uncertainty interval [UI] 15·4-19·2 billion) and diarrhoeal diseases (2·39 billion, 2·30-2·50 billion). Eight causes of chronic disease and injury each affected more than 10% of the world's population in 2015: permanent caries, tension-type headache, iron-deficiency anaemia, age-related and other hearing loss, migraine, genital herpes, refraction and accommodation disorders, and ascariasis. The impairment that affected the greatest number of people in 2015 was anaemia, with 2·36 billion (2·35-2·37 billion) individuals affected. The second and third leading impairments by number of individuals affected were hearing loss and vision loss, respectively. Between 2005 and 2015, there was little change in the leading causes of years lived with disability (YLDs) on a global basis. NCDs accounted for 18 of the leading 20 causes of age-standardised YLDs on a global scale. Where rates were decreasing, the rate of decrease for YLDs was slower than that of years of life lost (YLLs) for nearly every cause included in our analysis. For low SDI geographies, Group 1 causes typically accounted for 20-30% of total disability, largely attributable to nutritional deficiencies, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis. Lower back and neck pain was the leading global cause of disability in 2015 in most countries. The leading cause was sense organ disorders in 22 countries in Asia and Africa and one in central Latin America; diabetes in four countries in Oceania; HIV/AIDS in three southern sub-Saharan African countries; collective violence and legal intervention in two north African and Middle Eastern countries; iron-deficiency anaemia in Somalia and Venezuela; depression in Uganda; onchoceriasis in Liberia; and other neglected tropical diseases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. INTERPRETATION Ageing of the world's population is increasing the number of people living with sequelae of diseases and injuries. Shifts in the epidemiological profile driven by socioeconomic change also contribute to the continued increase in years lived with disability (YLDs) as well as the rate of increase in YLDs. Despite limitations imposed by gaps in data availability and the variable quality of the data available, the standardised and comprehensive approach of the GBD study provides opportunities to examine broad trends, compare those trends between countries or subnational geographies, benchmark against locations at similar stages of development, and gauge the strength or weakness of the estimates available. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
|
37
|
Oliveira-Ramos F, Eusébio M, M Martins F, Mourão AF, Furtado C, Campanilho-Marques R, Cordeiro I, Ferreira J, Cerqueira M, Figueira R, Brito I, Canhão H, Santos MJ, Melo-Gomes JA, Fonseca JE. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood: fulfilment of classification criteria for adult rheumatic diseases, long-term outcomes and predictors of inactive disease, functional status and damage. RMD Open 2016; 2:e000304. [PMID: 27752356 PMCID: PMC5051503 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine how adult juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients fulfil classification criteria for adult rheumatic diseases, evaluate their outcomes and determine clinical predictors of inactive disease, functional status and damage. Methods Patients with JIA registered on the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) older than 18 years and with more than 5 years of disease duration were included. Data regarding sociodemographic features, fulfilment of adult classification criteria, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index—articular (JADI-A) and Juvenile Arthritis Damage Index—extra-articular (JADI-E) damage index and disease activity were analysed. Results 426 patients were included. Most of patients with systemic JIA fulfilled criteria for Adult Still's disease. 95.6% of the patients with rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive polyarthritis and 57.1% of the patients with RF-negative polyarthritis matched criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 38.9% of the patients with extended oligoarthritis were classified as RA while 34.8% of the patients with persistent oligoarthritis were classified as spondyloarthritis. Patients with enthesitis-related arthritis fulfilled criteria for spondyloarthritis in 94.7%. Patients with psoriatic arthritis maintained this classification. Patients with inactive disease had lower disease duration, lower diagnosis delay and corticosteroids exposure. Longer disease duration was associated with higher HAQ, JADI-A and JADI-E. Higher JADI-A was also associated with biological treatment and retirement due to JIA disability and higher JADI-E with corticosteroids exposure. Younger age at disease onset was predictive of higher HAQ, JADI-A and JADI-E and decreased the chance of inactive disease. Conclusions Most of the included patients fulfilled classification criteria for adult rheumatic diseases, maintain active disease and have functional impairment. Younger age at disease onset was predictive of higher disability and decreased the chance of inactive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Oliveira-Ramos
- Rheumatology Department, Santa Maria Hospital-CHLN, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Ana Filipa Mourão
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Department, Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carolina Furtado
- Rheumatology Department , Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo , Ponta Delgada , Portugal
| | - Raquel Campanilho-Marques
- Rheumatology Department, Santa Maria Hospital-CHLN, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Cordeiro
- Rheumatology Department , Hospital Garcia de Orta , Almada , Portugal
| | - Joana Ferreira
- Rheumatology Department , Centro Universitário Hospitalar de Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal
| | - Marcos Cerqueira
- Rheumatology Department , ULSAM-Hospital Conde de Bertiandos , Ponte de Lima , Portugal
| | - Ricardo Figueira
- Rheumatology Department , Hospital Dr Nélio Mendonça , Funchal , Portugal
| | - Iva Brito
- Rheumatology Department , Hospital de São João and Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto , Porto , Portugal
| | - Helena Canhão
- Rheumatology Department, Santa Maria Hospital-CHLN, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria José Santos
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | | | - João Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Department, Santa Maria Hospital-CHLN, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Detert J, Burmester GR. [Treat to target and personalized medicine (precision medicine)]. Z Rheumatol 2016; 75:624-32. [PMID: 27365026 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-016-0137-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Detert
- Klinik m.S. Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - G R Burmester
- Klinik m.S. Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|