Clinical features of central nervous system infections and experience in differential diagnosis from neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus in a cohort of 8491 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Epstein-Barr Virus encephalitis associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-based review

BACKGROUND

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is characterized by immune dysregulation that results in an uncontrolled hyperinflammatory state. HLH is classified into two main categories: primary (familial) HLH and secondary (acquired) HLH. Secondary HLH can result from various underlying, including infection-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IAHS) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) associated with rheumatologic disorders, among others. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) often causes IAHS, but central nervous system (CNS) involvement is rare among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We report a case of EBV encephalitis associated with HLH in a patient with childhood-onset SLE.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 12-year-old girl had received a diagnosis of SLE 2 months before presentation. After a period of inactive disease on treatment, fever and seizures, with altered mental status and hallucinations, developed over several weeks. A complete blood cell count (CBC) revealed pancytopenia, accompanied by elevated levels of inflammatory markers: 86 mm/hr erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 8.9 mg/dl c-reactive protein, and 3,966 ng/mL of ferritin. The differential diagnosis included active neuropsychiatric SLE, CNS infection and neurological manifestations in secondary HLH, which could have represented either IAHS or MAS. Meropenem and acyclovir were initially administered for clinical acute encephalitis, followed by pulse methylprednisolone; however, the fever persisted, and another CBC revealed progressive cytopenia. A bone marrow study showed hypocellularity and active hemophagocytic activity, and intravenous immunoglobulin was additionally given due to the diagnosis of HLH. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed 60/mm3 white blood cells (N 55%, L 45%), 141 mg/dL glucose (0.7 blood-CSF glucose ratio), < 4 mg/dL protein; results of Gram stain and bacterial culture were negative. The viral encephalitis panel from the CSF confirmed EBV infection. Bone marrow immunohistochemistry examination revealed increasing levels of CD8 + T-cell and equivocal positive results for EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization; therefore, HLH potentially associated with EBV was diagnosed. After treatment with IVIg, cyclosporin A, and prednisolone, the patient's symptoms gradually improved and she was eventually able to return to school.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case highlights the importance of a thorough differential diagnosis, including EBV encephalitis associated with HLH, in patients with childhood SLE, particularly in cases of clinical deterioration occurs after initial treatment.

Topological structural characteristics in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without neuropsychiatric symptoms

PURPOSE

This study investigated the topological structural characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with and without neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSLE and non-NPSLE), and explore their clinical implications.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 50 patients with SLE (21 non-NPSLE and 29 NPSLE) and 32 age-matched healthy controls (HCs), using MRI diffusion tensor imaging. Individual structural networks were constructed using fibre numbers between brain areas as edge weights. Global metrics (eg, small-worldness, global efficiency) and local network properties (eg, degree centrality, nodal efficiency) were computed. Group comparisons of network characteristics were conducted. Clinical correlations were assessed using partial correlation, and differentiation between non-NPSLE and NPSLE was performed using support vector classification.

RESULTS

Patients with oth non-NPSLE and NPSLE exhibited significant global and local topological alterations compared with HCs. These changes were more pronounced in NPSLE, particularly affecting the default mode and sensorimotor networks. Topological changes in patients with SLE correlated with lesion burdens and clinical parameters such as disease duration and the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics damage index. The identified topological features enabled accurate differentiation between non-NPSLE and NPSLE with 87% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Structural networks in patients SLE may be altered at both global and local levels, with more pronounced changes observed in NPSLE, notably affecting the default mode and sensorimotor networks. These alterations show promise as biomarkers for clinical diagnosis.

Neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus: Focusing on autoantibodies

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently suffer from nervous system complications, termed neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPLE). NPLE accounts for the poor prognosis of SLE. Correct attribution of NP events to SLE is the primary principle in managing NPLE. The vascular injuries and neuroinflammation are the fundamental neuropathologic changes in NPLE. Specific autoantibody-mediated central nerve system (CNS) damages distinguish NPLE from other CNS disorders. Though the central antibodies in NPLE are generally thought to be raised from the periphery immune system, they may be produced in the meninges and choroid plexus. On this basis, abnormal activation of microglia and disease-associated microglia (DAM) should be the common mechanisms of NPLE and other CNS disturbances. Improved understanding of both characteristic and sharing features of NPLE might yield further options for managing this disease.

Emerging Molecular Markers Towards Potential Diagnostic Panels for Lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease which can affect various tissues and organs, posing significant challenges for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The etiology of SLE is highly complex with contributions from environmental factors, stochastic factors as well as genetic susceptibility. The current criteria for diagnosing SLE is based primarily on a combination of clinical presentations and traditional lab testing. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. They are unable to indicate disease cause or guide physicians in decision-making for treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a more accurate and robust tool for effective clinical management and drug development in lupus patients. It is fortunate that the emerging Omics have empowered scientists in the discovery and identification of potential novel biomarkers of SLE, especially the markers from blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluids (CSF), and other bodily fluids. However, many of these markers have not been carefully validated for clinical use. In addition, it is apparent that individual biomarkers lack sensitivity or specificity. This review summarizes the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic value of emerging biomarkers from recent studies, and discusses the potential of these markers in the development of biomarker panel based diagnostics or disease monitoring system in SLE.

Central nervous system infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on central nervous system (CNS) infections in patients with SLE, in order to describe their clinical and microbiological characteristics, and outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed/Medline and Embase electronic databases was performed (March 2021) to identify all published studies on CNS infections and their characteristics in patients with SLE. A random-effects model was adopted and findings were reported with 95% CI. Overall, 6 studies involving 17 751 patients with SLE and 209 SLE cases with CNS infection were included in our meta-analysis. The frequency rate of CNS infections in patients with SLE was 0.012 (95% CI: 0.008 to 0.018). Meningitis was the most common clinical syndrome (93.5%, n=109/114, 95% CI: 82.6% to 97.8%) and Cryptococcus neoformans (35.9%, n=55, 95% CI: 27.2% to 45.7%) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (27.1%, n=43, 95% CI: 14.6% to 44.8%) were the most common causative pathogens. Our patient-pool showed a mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score of 7.9 (95% CI: 6.1 to 9.6), while 92.4% (n=72/76, 95% CI: 83.0% to 96.8%) of cases were on oral systemic corticosteroids, with a prednisone equivalent mean daily dose of 30.9 mg/day (95% CI: 18.0 to 43.7). Our meta-analysis revealed a mortality rate of 29.0% (95% CI: 15.0% to 48.6%). Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for cryptococcal and tuberculosis (TB) meningitis in patients with SLE with suspected CNS infection, particularly in those with higher SLEDAI and on higher doses of systemic corticosteroids. In conclusion, initiation of empiric antituberculous treatment for patients with SLE who are highly suspected to have CNS TB is warranted while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. Antifungals might also be potentially useful empirically in patients with SLE who are suspected to have fungal CNS infections. However, with respect to side effects such as toxicity and high cost of antifungals, decision regarding early antifungal therapy should be guided by early and less time-consuming fungal diagnostic tests.

The prevalence and mortality of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Growing evidence suggests that autoimmune diseases (AIDs) are risk factors for cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Therefore, understanding the epidemiological and clinical profile of CM in patients with AIDs is important. This meta-analysis assessed the prevalence, clinical profiles, and clinical outcomes of CM in AIDs. Studies on CM in patients with AIDs were searched for in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and meta-analyses were performed using the statistical program of R. Nineteen studies with 36,631 patients with AIDs were analyzed. The overall pooled CM prevalence was 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.6%), 90.7% of which occurred in female patients. Thirteen studies with 77 patients with AIDs diagnosed with CM were analyzed, and the mortality rate was 26.7% (95% CI, 9.5-47.2%). Of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 30.1% of CM cases were initially misdiagnosed (95% CI, 0-65.6%). The primary symptom of CM with AIDs was headache (99.4%; 95% CI, 92.1-100%), followed by fever (93.7%; 95% CI, 82.8-100%) and vomiting (37.2%; 95% CI, 13.2-61.2%). The prevalence of CM infections among patients with AIDs should not be underestimated despite non-specific clinical presentations as there were fatal outcomes. Our results suggest that more research is needed to understand the relationship between AIDs and CM, and clinical trials are necessary to improve treatment strategies.

Management of Severe Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Real-World Experience and Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a highly heterogeneous disease affecting multiple organs and is characterized by an aberrant immune response. Although the mortality of SLE has decreased significantly since the application of glucocorticoids, severe or refractory SLE can potentially cause irreversible organ damage and contribute to the disease morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of severe SLE or life-threatening conditions is of great challenge to clinicians since the onset symptoms can be rapid and aggressive, involving the visceral organs of the neuropsychiatric, gastrointestinal, hematologic, renal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular systems, etc. Additionally, SLE patients with specific comorbidities and detrimental complications could lead to a clinical dilemma and contribute to poor prognosis. Prompt and adequate treatment for severe refractory SLE is crucial for a better prognosis. However, as evidence from well-designed randomized controlled trials is limited, this review aims to provide real-world evidence based on cohort studies from Peking Union Medical College Hospital, the national tertiary referral center in China, together with the literature, on clinical characteristics, risks and prognostic factors, and treatment strategies for severe and/or refractory SLE.

Serological comparison of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric lupus using synthetic nucleic acid antigens

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disorder characterized by an irregular exchange between the central nervous system and the immune system, leading to the outbreak of neurological conditions with possible disabling effects. Although neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus is the most common expression of lupus condition, it is still poorly understood. In this study, we focus on the development of an advantageous method based on the application of synthetic nucleic acids and protein-based antigen arrays in order to characterize autoreactive antibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. We confirmed the benefits of using synthetic oligonucleotides such as assay reproducibility, elevated affinity and specificity to autoreactive antibodies. We also demonstrated presence of autoantibodies towards three particular synthetic double stranded antigens and verify similarity of antinuclear antibody patterns in ordinary lupus and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: year in review 2019

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with extreme heterogeneity and potentially involvement of any organ or system. Numerous unanswered questions and challenges in SLE always prompt further exploration. In 2019, great progress in various aspects of SLE emerged. Both the classification criteria and management recommendation for SLE were updated. New promising medications have been widely developed and tested, although subsequent clinical studies are warranted. As an emerging number of most notable studies in SLE were published in both clinical area and basic research in 2019, we aim to summarize the highest quality data on SLE regarding novel insights of pathogenesis, updated recommendations, hot-spot issues on clinical manifestations, new understanding of disease prognosis, and most importantly, the therapeutic advances in SLE in this review.