Preferable outcome of Janus kinase inhibitors for a group of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis patients: from the FIRST Registry

JAK Inhibition as a Potential Treatment Target in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are a group of molecules responsible for signal transduction of multiple cytokines and growth factors in different cell types, involved in the maintenance of immune tolerance. Thus, the dysregulation of this pathway plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune, inflammatory, and allergic diseases and is an attractive treatment target. JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have been approved in the treatment of multiple autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (SPA). In SLE, there is a plethora of ongoing trials evaluating their efficacy, with tofacitinib, baricitinib and deucravacitinib showing promising results, without major safety concerns. In this review, we will discuss the rationale of targeting JAKinibs in SLE and summarize the clinical data of efficacy and safety of JAKinibs in SLE patients.

Clinical and ultrasound features of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter RA ultrasound cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The optimal strategy for difficult-to-treat (D2T) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been identified, and the ultrasound characteristics of D2T RA have not been reported. We investigated the clinical characteristics and factors contributing to the outcome in D2T RA in a multicentre RA ultrasound observational cohort.

METHOD

We reviewed 307 Japanese patients diagnosed with RA who underwent treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). We compared the differences in patient characteristics between the D2T RA and non-D2T RA groups. We examined the factors contributing to a good response [defined as b/tsDMARD continuation and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 10 at 12 months] in the D2T RA patient group.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (14%) were categorized as D2T RA and the remaining 264 (86%) as non-D2T RA at baseline. The grey-scale (GS) score, disease duration, and CDAI at the initiation of treatment were significantly higher in the D2T RA group than in the non-D2T RA group. In contrast, the power Doppler (PD) score was not significantly different between the two groups. Of the 43 D2T RA patients, 20 achieved a good response. The introduction of CTLA4-Ig (n = 5) was significantly associated with a good response in analysis based on inverse probability weighting with propensity score. GS and PD scores at baseline were not significantly associated with therapeutic response at 12 months in D2T RA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with D2T RA had high clinical and ultrasound activity and poor responses to treatment with b/tsDMARDs. CTLA4-Ig was associated with a good response at 12 months in D2T RA patients.

Characteristics of difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis: Results of a real-world multicentric study

OBJECTIVE

The EULAR task force recently published the difficult-to-treat RA (D2T RA) definition, however, a definition of D2T axSpA is still lacking and limitations in this definition exist. The objectives were to study the characteristics of D2T axSpA patients using the EULAR definition and to study a subgroup of patients with a predefined more stringent definition including a temporal criterion.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study was performed. D2T axSpA was defined as failure of≥2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanism of action. Very D2T axSpA was defined as failure of≥2 b/tsDMARDs in less than 2 years of follow-up. D2T and Very D2T axSpA patients were compared to non-D2T (nD2T) axSpA patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eleven axSpA patients were included: 88 D2T axSpA (28.3%) and 223 non-D2T (nD2T) axSpA (71.7%). Peripheral involvement was more prevalent in the D2T group (34.9 vs. 21.4%; P=0.015). BASDAI level at baseline was higher in the D2T group (63.7±16.5 vs. 58.8±14.7; P=0.015). Fibromyalgia was found to be more frequent in the D2T group vs nD2T group (P<0.001). Twelve patients (3.8%) were categorized as very D2T axSpA. Compared to nD2T, Very D2T patients had a higher CRP level at baseline (42.0±31.3 vs. 17.8±23.1; P=0.010). IBD prevalence at baseline was higher in the very D2T group (41.7 vs. 3.1%; P<0.001). None of the very D2T patients presented a fibromyalgia.

CONCLUSION

D2T axSpA was associated with higher disease activity, peripheral involvement, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and fibromyalgia. Very D2T patients represented a minim proportion of patients after applying a more stringent definition including a temporal criterion of 2 years and might be independent from fibromyalgia.

Extracting immunological and clinical heterogeneity across autoimmune rheumatic diseases by cohort-wide immunophenotyping

OBJECTIVE

Extracting immunological and clinical heterogeneity across autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) is essential towards personalised medicine.

METHODS

We conducted large-scale and cohort-wide immunophenotyping of 46 peripheral immune cells using Human Immunology Protocol of comprehensive 8-colour flow cytometric analysis. Dataset consisted of >1000 Japanese patients of 11 AIRDs with deep clinical information registered at the FLOW study, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In-depth clinical and immunological characterisation was conducted for the identified RA patient clusters, including associations of inborn human genetics represented by Polygenic Risk Score (PRS).

RESULTS

Multimodal clustering of immunophenotypes deciphered underlying disease-cell type network in immune cell, disease and patient cluster resolutions. This provided immune cell type specificity shared or distinct across AIRDs, such as close immunological network between mixed connective tissue disease and SLE. Individual patient-level clustering dissected patients with AIRD into several clusters with different immunological features. Of these, RA-like or SLE-like clusters were exclusively dominant, showing immunological differentiation between RA and SLE across AIRDs. In-depth clinical analysis of RA revealed that such patient clusters differentially defined clinical heterogeneity in disease activity and treatment responses, such as treatment resistance in patients with RA with SLE-like immunophenotypes. PRS based on RA case-control and within-case stratified genome-wide association studies were associated with clinical and immunological characteristics. This pointed immune cell type implicated in disease biology such as dendritic cells for RA-interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSION

Cohort-wide and cross-disease immunophenotyping elucidate clinically heterogeneous patient subtypes existing within single disease in immune cell type-specific manner.

Management and treatment outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies: evaluation of 10-year data from the KURAMA cohort

BACKGROUND

Advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, highlighted by biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), have altered the paradigm of RA treatment in the last decade. Therefore, real-world clinical evidence is needed to understand how treatment strategies and outcomes have changed.

METHODS

Using an observational cohort of RA from 2012 to 2021, we collected cross-sectional data of RA patients annually to analyze a trend in RA management. For patients who initiated b/tsDMRDs, we evaluated treatment outcomes between b/tsDMARDs. Mixed-effect models were applied to examine the statistical implications of changes over time in treatment outcomes with a background adjustment.

RESULTS

We analyzed annual cross-sectional data from 5070 patients and longitudinal data from 1816 patients in whom b/tsDMARDs were initiated between 2012 and 2021. b/tsDMARD use increased, whereas glucocorticoid use decreased from 2012 to 2021. Disease activity and functional disability measures improved over time. The percentage of tsDMARD prescriptions considerably increased. All b/tsDMARDs showed clinical improvements in disease activity and functional disability. Statistically, TNFi showed better short-term improvements in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, while IL6Ri demonstrated significant long-term benefits. IL6Ri had better retention rates in switched patients. After adjustment for patient characteristics, the annual change of RA disease activity and functional disability fared significantly better from 2012 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

With the development of new RA therapeutics, overall treatment outcomes advanced in the past decade.

Socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the socioeconomic impact of treatment with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We analysed data retrospectively from the prospective observational CorEvitas RA Japan Registry (March 2016-February 2020). Patients were categorised into paid workers (PWs) and home workers (HWs) and further based on drug classes. We assessed medication persistence, treatment outcomes, health care resource utilisation, and socioeconomic impact over 12 months, including direct (drugs and health care resource utilisation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs.

RESULTS

Overall, 187 PWs and 114 HWs were identified. Over 12 months, medication persistence was high, treatment outcomes improved, and outpatient visits reduced in both groups. Following treatment initiation, direct costs increased, whereas indirect (loss of productivity) costs decreased in both groups. The unadjusted socioeconomic impact [Japanese yen (JPY)] increased across all drug classes in PWs (range: 29,700-151,700) and HWs (range: -28,700 to 83,000). Adjusted change in monthly socioeconomic impact was JPY 29,700-138,900 for PWs and JPY -28,000 to 92,800 for HWs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the socioeconomic burden increased across patient groups and drug classes. The decrease in indirect (loss of productivity) costs partially offset the increase in direct costs.

Characteristics of patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis in a French single-centre hospital

OBJECTIVES

To compare the features of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) patients using two different definitions according to the previous failure of targeted therapies.

METHODS

We stratified consecutive RA patients treated at Cochin Hospital into two groups, a D2TRA group and a non-D2TRA group, according to two definitions of D2TRA. Both definitions defined D2TRA as RAs failing at least two targeted therapies, with a different mechanism of action for the EULAR-D2TRA definition or without prejudging the mechanism of action and for the Alternative D2TRA definition.

RESULTS

We included 320 consecutive RA patients. We identified 76 EULAR-D2TRA and 244 non-DTRA patients, and 120 Alternative D2TRA and 200 non-DTRA patients. Compared with non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients from both definitions were more likely to have lower socioeconomic level, positive rheumatoid factor, interstitial lung disease, higher DAS28-CRP and were more likely to respond to rituximab and Janus kinase inhibitors. Although EULAR and Alternative D2TRA patients displayed similar clinical and biological features, they were characterized by different therapeutic profiles. We observed fewer patients receiving methotrexate in the Alternative D2TRA group (53% vs 64%, P = 0.046). Patients with Alternative D2TRA not fulfilling the EULAR definition (n = 44) had all received two successive first-line TNF inhibitors, a monoclonal antibody and a soluble receptor, and were comparable to EULAR-D2TRA patients with regards to all other characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Low socioeconomic status, diabetes, interstitial lung disease and absence of combination with methotrexate allow identification of D2TRA. In addition, the inclusion as 'early-D2TRA' of patients failing two TNF inhibitors in the EULAR definition of D2TRA would facilitate the rapid identification of D2TRA patients.

A Review of Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail multiple biologic therapies are deemed to have "difficult-to-treat" (D2T) RA. In 2021, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force proposed a clinical definition of D2T RA. Here we review RA phenotypes and clinical assessment of RA, propose a different definition of D2T RA, discuss possible D2T RA risk factors, and summarize existing literature on the management of D2T RA.

RECENT FINDINGS

High disease activity at the time of diagnosis or prior to treatment with a biologic is associated with the development of D2T RA. Prolonged time from diagnosis to beginning treatment has been consistently associated with the development of D2T RA. Other clinical factors such as burden of disease, extraarticular disease, obesity, smoking, pain, fatigue, and psychological conditions have inconsistent associations with D2T RA according to current literature. D2T RA is a relatively new concept that represents an area of great need for research regarding the characterization of those with the disease as well as how best to treat the disease. With this gained knowledge, rheumatologists will be able to better identify patients at the time of diagnosis that are likely to develop D2T RA to help guide management.

Characteristics Of Difficult-To-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis: A Comparative Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The EULAR task force recently published the difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) criteria, however, a definition of D2T patients in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still lacking. To date, we have little data concerning D2T PsA, especially in real-world. One of the limitations of the D2T RA EULAR definition is the absence of a temporal criterion. The primary endpoint of this work was to study the characteristics of D2T PsA patients using the EULAR definition. The second objective was to study a sub-group of patients with a predefined more stringent definition including a temporal criterion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary center. D2T PsA was defined as failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanism of action. Very D2T PsA was defined as failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs in less than 2 years of follow-up. D2T and Very D2T PsA patients were compared to nD2T PsA patients using statistical tests.

RESULTS

150 PsA patients were included (from 2004 to 2015): 49 D2T PsA and 101 nD2T PsA. D2T PsA was associated with a higher prevalence of axial involvement (p=0.030), axial and/or peripheral structural damage (p=0.007) at baseline and more bDMARDs discontinuation due to poor dermatological control (p=0.005). There was no significant difference regarding comorbidities such as obesity, smoking status, fibromyalgia or depression. In multivariate analysis, peripheral structural damage at baseline was found to be a predictive factor for D2T PsA with an OR of 2.57 (1.16 to 5.69; p=0.020). 17 PsA (11.3%) patients were categorized as Very D2T PsA. When compared to nD2T group, proportion of obesity was higher (p=0.015) and axial involvement was more prevalent in the Very D2T group (p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

D2T PsA patients had a higher prevalence of axial involvement, peripheral structural damage and therapeutic discontinuation due to poor dermatological control whereas Very D2T PsA patients were more likely obese with axial involvement. Very D2T PsA represent a minim proportion among patients when applying a more stringent definition. Pending the PsA D2T definition by the European and American societies, this study highlights some characteristics that may help practitioners better identify D2T patients.

Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Characteristics and Treatment Options

Elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) is a distinct clinical entity defined as the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in individuals aged over 60 years. EORA presents unique clinical features, including a more equitable distribution of sexes, a potential predilection for male involvement, a higher incidence of acute onset characterized by constitutional symptoms, a propensity for systemic manifestations, elevated sedimentation rates at disease onset, a reduced occurrence of rheumatoid factor positivity, increased titers of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, a preference for involvement of large joints, elevated disease activity, the presence of bone erosions, and heightened patient disability. RA is recognized to consist of three partially overlapping subsets. One subset mirrors the classical RA clinical presentation, while the remaining subsets exhibit either a polymyalgia rheumatica-like phenotype or present with remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis accompanied by pitting edema syndrome. In the initial stages of EORA management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not typically the first-line treatment choice, because seniors are much more prone to develop side effects due to NSAIDs, and the use of NSAIDs is in reality contraindicated to the majority of seniors due to comorbidities. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), frequently methotrexate, are introduced immediately after the diagnosis is made. In cases where elderly patients demonstrate resistance to conventional DMARD therapy, the introduction of biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs becomes a viable treatment option. EORA presents a unique clinical profile, necessitating tailored treatment strategies. Our study emphasizes the challenges of NSAID use in seniors, highlighting the imperative shift toward DMARDs such as methotrexate. Future research should explore personalized DMARD approaches based on disease activity, comorbidities, and safety considerations, aiming to optimize treatment outcomes and minimize glucocorticoid reliance, thereby enhancing the quality of care for EORA patients.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update on the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are the most recent new drug class to arrive to the market for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. While they have proven to be a very effective treatment option, there remains significant concern regarding the risk of cardiovascular events, thrombosis and malignancy, particularly given the findings of the post-marketing ORAL Surveillance study and FDA black box warnings. This article reviews the key findings of the most impactful cohort of studies and registry data since ORAL Surveillance. It also evaluates the role of JAKis in practice and offers guidance on risk stratifying patients and determining their suitability for a JAKi.

Computed tomography for malignancy screening in patients with rheumatoid arthritis before initiation of disease modifying antirheumatic drug

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of screening for malignancies using CT before the initiation of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with active RA.

METHODS

We examined 2192 patients with RA who underwent plain CT scans prior to the initiation of b/tsDMARDs. The sensitivity for detecting malignancy was measured and compared with that of regular screening (physical examination and X-ray). We then evaluated the clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of patients with RA with concomitant malignancies. Additionally, we determined the incidence rate of malignancy in patients with RA who were initiated on b/tsDMARDs after CT screening.

RESULTS

Of the 2192 patients, 33 (1.5%) were diagnosed with malignancy after CT screening. Whereas regular screening detected only seven malignancies, CT screening further detected 26 (including 19 at the early stage). On the other hand, 86% of the malignancies detectable by regular screening were at an advanced stage. Patients diagnosed with early-stage malignancies received RA treatments that included b/tsDMARDs after curative resection; 80% of these patients achieved low disease activity after 1 year. This rate was comparable to the patients without malignancy detection after screening (70%). The 5 year incidence of malignancy after the initiation of b/tsDMARDs after CT screening was lower than that of the RA cohort without CT screening (standardized incidence ratio: 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Screening in patients with RA using CT before the initiation of b/tsDMARDs allows for the early detection and treatment of malignancy, resulting in safer and more stable b/tsDMARD treatments.

Difficult to treat rheumatoid arthritis in a comprehensive evaluation program: frequency according to different objective evaluations

Difficult-to-treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-D2T) is a condition in which patients do not achieve the treatment target despite multiple advanced therapies, more others features. Aims: to estimate the frequency of RA-D2T in a cohort comprehensively evaluated (clinical, serology, imaging), and to analyze the associated characteristics. In a second part, the frequency of RA-D2T after 1 year of follow-up, analyzing the predictive variables at baseline and therapeutic behavior. Cross-sectional and prospective study, consecutive RA were included, then those who completed the one-year follow-up were evaluated. RA-D2T frequency was estimated (DAS28-CDAI-SDAI-Ultrasonography (US)-HAQ) at baseline and 1 year. The variables associated and those baseline predictive characteristics of D2T at 1 year, and their independent association by logistic regression were analyzed. The treatment approach was described. Two hundred seventy-six patients completed the evaluation, frequency of RA-D2T (all scores): 27.5%. Anemia, RF high titers and higher HAQ score were independent associated. At year, 125 competed follow-up. RA-D2T (all scores): 33%, D2T-US and D2T-HAQ were 14 and 18.4% (p 0.001). Predictive baseline characteristics D2T (all score): ACPA + (OR: 13.7) and X-ray erosion (OR: 2.9). D2T-US: X-ray erosion (OR: 19.7). Conventional DMARDs, corticosteroids and TNF-blockers were the drugs most used by D2T patients, Jaki were the most used in the switch. We showed different frequencies of RA-D2T according to different objective parameters (scores, images) and their association with patient characteristics. In turn, predictive variables (erosions-ACPA) for RA-D2T at 1 year were analyzed. It was shown that the Jaki were the most used drug in these patients.

Inappropriate treatment response to DMARDs: A pathway to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis

In recent years, difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) has attracted significant attention from rheumatologists due to its poor treatment response and the persistent symptoms or signs experienced by patients. The therapeutic demands of patients with D2T RA are not properly met due to unclear pathogenic causes and a lack of high-quality data for current treatment options, creating considerable management difficulties with this patient population. This review describes the clinical challenges associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and explores contributing factors associated with inappropriate response to DMARDs that may lead to D2T RA and related immunological dysregulation. It is now understood that D2T RA is a highly heterogeneous pathological status that involves multiple factors. These factors include but are not limited to genetics, environment, immunogenicity, comorbidities, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate drug application, poor adherence, and socioeconomic status. Besides, these factors may manifest in the selection and utilization of specific DMARDs, either individually or in combination, thereby contributing to inadequate treatment response. Finding these variables may offer hints for enhancing DMARD therapy plans and bettering the condition of D2T RA patients.

Making a prescribing choice for rheumatoid arthritis: a focus on small molecule drugs vs. biologics for the most favourable patient outcome

INTRODUCTION

The molecular targeted therapies available for rheumatoid arthritis include 10 types of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and five types of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. This article reviews the differential and proper use of bDMARDs and JAK inhibitors, focusing on their efficacy and safety, based mainly on phase III clinical trials.

AREA COVERED

The JAK inhibitors approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis are compared with bDMARDs based on the evidence derived from global phase III trials.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with inadequate responses to bDMARDs and JAK inhibitors, switching between these drugs is comparable in efficacy in both directions. Head-to-head comparison demonstrated that baricitinib and upadacitinib are more efficacious than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, the ORAL Surveillance study demonstrated that JAK inhibitors are associated with higher incidences of death, major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancies and thrombosis than TNF inhibitors in at-risk patients. The need for risk assessment by pre-treatment screening, regular monitoring during treatment, and appropriate systemic management in adverse events should be recognized. Meanwhile, some JAK-inhibitors were efficacious even for difficult-to-treat disease. These results suggest the need for establishing therapeutic strategies considering the balance between safety and efficacy in individual patients.

Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: results from an international consensus meeting

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have persistent symptoms and disease activity despite the best available medical or surgical treatments. These patients are commonly referred to as having difficult-to-treat IBD and need additional therapeutic strategies. However, the absence of standard definitions has impeded clinical research efforts and comparisons of data. Under the guidance of the endpoints cluster of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, we held a consensus meeting to propose a common operative definition for difficult-to-treat IBD. 16 participants from 12 countries voted on 20 statements covering various elements of difficult-to-treat IBD, such as failure of medical and surgical treatments, disease phenotypes, and specific complaints from patients. "Agreement" was defined as at least 75% consensus. The group agreed that difficult-to-treat IBD is defined by the failure of biologics and advanced small molecules with at least two different mechanisms of action, or postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease after two surgical resections in adults, or one in children. In addition, chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, complex perianal disease, and comorbid psychosocial complications that impair disease management also qualified as difficult-to-treat IBD. Adoption of these criteria could serve to standardise reporting, guide enrolment in clinical trials, and help identify candidates for enhanced treatment strategies.

The impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life use of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: the Expanded Risk Score in RA as a tool to quantify the risk of cardiovascular events

Objective

To evaluate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life prescription of JAK inhibitors (JAKis) and the use of the Expanded Risk Score in RA (ERS-RA) to quantify the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-life RA patients treated with JAKis. Patients were classified as ineligible for JAKis if they fulfilled EMA criteria (>65 years-old, history of malignancy, or increased risk of venous thromboembolic events [VTE] or MACE including smoking). Risk of MACE was defined according to ORAL Surveillance trial inclusion criteria (ORALSURV) or by using the ERS-RA.

Results

Of 194 patients enrolled, 57.9% were classified as ineligible according to EMA definition (ORALSURV criteria). The most frequent reason for ineligibility was increased MACE risk (70.2%), followed by age>65 (34.2%), smoking (30.7%), and increased risk of VTE (20.2%) or malignancy (7%). The use of the ERS-RA reduced the rate of patients carrying an increased CV risk to 18.6% (p<0.001 versus ORALSURV), leading to 46.4% overall ineligible patients. Over a drug-exposure of 337 patient/years, we observed 2 VTE, one MACE (non-fatal stroke), and one solid malignancy (all in the group of patients classified as ineligible according to both the definitions).

Conclusions

Rigorous application of EMA indications in clinical practice could result in the exclusion of a large proportion of RA patients from treatment with JAKis. A proper quantification of the risk for MACE by dedicated tools as ERS-RA is advocated to better tailor the management of RA.

ReLiFiRa (Real Life Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis): Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety in Common Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Filgotinib (FIL) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor with an affinity 30-fold higher than JAK2, approved to treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in adults with inadequate response or intolerance to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL 200 mg daily therapy, after 3 and 6 months, in 120 patients affected by RA, managed in Tuscany and Umbria rheumatological centers. The following clinical records were analyzed: demographical data, smoking status, previous presence of comorbidities (Herpes zoster -HZ- infection, venous thromboembolism -VTE-, major adverse cardiovascular events -MACE-, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension), disease duration, presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), number of biological failures, and prior csDMARDs utilized. At baseline, and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months of FIL therapy, we evaluated mean steroid dosage, csDMARDs intake, clinimetric indexes (DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, patient and doctor PGA, VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 7.5 years; the prevalence of previous HZ infection, VTE, MACE, and cancer was respectively 4.12%, 0%, 7.21%, and 0.83%, respectively. In total, 76.3% of patients failed one or more biologics (one biological failure, 20.6%; two biological failures, 27.8%; three biological failures, 16.5%; four biological failures, 10.3%; five biological failures, 1.1%). After 3 months of FIL therapy, all clinimetric index results significantly improved from baseline, as well as after 6 months. Also, ESR and CRP significatively decreased at T3 and T6. Two cases of HZ were recorded, while no new MACE, VTE, or cancer were recorded during the observation time.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of the retrospective study and of the observational period of only 6 months, real-life data on the treatment of RA patients with FIL demonstrate that this Jak inhibitor therapy is safe in terms of CV, VTE events, and occurrence of cancer, and is also effective in a population identified as "difficult to treat" due to failure of previous b-DMARD therapy.

Are the Goals of Therapy Achievable in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Upadacitinib in Real Clinical Practice?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of UPA in RA patients in real clinical practice after 3 and 6 months of therapy. The study included 63 RA patients with high activity of the disease. Activity was assessed according to the DAS28(ESR), DAS28(CRP), SDAI, CDAI; functional ability to HAQ; quality of life to the EQ-5D; disease activity according to the patient's RAPID-3 index; the level of depression and anxiety to the HADS scale. The effectiveness of therapy was evaluated after 3 (n = 45) and 6 (n = 31) months of UPA therapy. Remission or low activity of the disease by 3 months of therapy was achieved by most patients: remission of 69.8% of patients, low activity of the disease-16.3% of patients. Moderate or high activity persisted in 13.9% of patients. By the 6th month of UPA therapy, the number of remissions reached 90%, low activity 3.3%, moderate activity persisted in 6.7% of patients, high activity of the disease was not in any patient. 20% improvement in function was achieved in 71.8% of patients by the 3rd month of therapy and in 77.8% by the 6th month of treatment; the difference in average HAQ values by the 3rd month of therapy was 0.38 points, by the 6th month-0.58 points. After 3 months of follow-up, 31.1% of patients continued taking GC, by 6 months-24.2%. The dose of GC was reduced from an average of 7.23 to 5.6 mg/s. The percentage of patients requiring NSAIDs decreased from 95.2 to 35.6% and 33.3%, respectively. DMARDs continued to be received by 75.6% of patients by 3 months and 69.7% by 6 months of follow-up. Achieving remission or low activity of the disease in patients with RA receiving UPA in real clinical practice is possible in most patients. A rapid decrease in inflammatory activity is accompanied by a significant improvement in the functional state and quality of life of patients. UPA therapy reduces the need for the use of NSAIDs and reduces the dose of GC in a third of patients.

A JAK Inhibitor for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Baricitinib Experience

Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate for treating adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provides improvements in clinical signs, symptoms and patient-reported outcomes. Currently, baricitinib is approved for treating RA in more than 75 countries. In several pivotal Phase II and III RA trials (RA-BALANCE, RA-BEGIN, RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, RA-BEACON, RA-BEYOND), up to seven years of baricitinib treatment was well tolerated and provided rapid and sustained efficacy, which was confirmed in real-world settings. Safety signals for another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, have emerged, as observed in the post-marketing Phase IIIb/IV trial Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance; safety signals were subsequently highlighted in a retrospective study of baricitinib and consequently new recommendations and warnings and precautions for all JAK inhibitors have been issued. Ongoing studies to further characterise and clarify the benefit:risk of JAK inhibitors include registries and controlled trials. This capstone review summarises clinical and real-world data outlining the benefit:risk profile of baricitinib, confirming that the improved disease activity and physical function of patients with RA treated with this JAK inhibitor observed in clinical trials is translated into effectiveness in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations.

Tight control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with targeted therapies across the COVID-19 pandemic era

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the impact of different patterns of healthcare delivery on remission of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with targeted therapies during the first wave (2020) and second/third waves (2021) of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (2019).

METHODS

In this observational real-life study, data from RA patients treated with biologic or targeted synthetic drugs were extracted from a longitudinal registry. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was analyzed in the same period from the 22nd of February to the 18th of May for three consecutive years. These three periods were characterized by different patterns of healthcare delivery: (1) before the pandemic (2019) only in-person visits, (2) during the first wave (2020) both in-person visits and telehealth, and (3) during the second/third waves (2021) only in-person visits. A generalized linear model with the binomial error was fitted to evaluate the difference in the proportion of patients in CDAI remission. Quantile regression was used to compare the median of CDAI in difficult-to-treat (D2T) patients.

RESULTS

In the three periods, we included 407, 450, and 540 RA patients respectively. The percentages of patients in CDAI remission were similar in the three periods (prevalence ratio 1.07, p value 0.423 between 2020 and 2019, and 1.01, p-value 0.934 between 2021 and 2019). The CDAI remission rate was 40.55% (N = 163), 43.18% (N = 155) and 40.82% (N = 220) in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Among our cohort of D2T patients, CDAI remission was similar across the three periods (N = 30, 22.22%; N = 27, 23.68%; and N = 34, 21.52% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although the pandemic has imposed changes in our healthcare delivery, these different strategies seem to be effective in ensuring satisfactory management of RA treated with targeted therapies. The approaches modulated in the context of the different periods have been a feasible compensation for ensuring disease control even in D2T patients.

JAK inhibition in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases

The most common immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis and have reached significant advances in recent years with the introduction of biological therapies against cytokines and immune cells, but also against intracellular enzymes, specifically Janus kinases (JAKs). Intracellular JAK signalling is activated by binding of various cytokines or growth factors to the respective cellular receptors, allowing the activation of STAT (Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription) transcription factors and ultimately the transcription of genes with important roles during the innate and adaptive immune response. Four Janus kinases have been described: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase-2 (TYK2). Four JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) are currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and some for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. JAK inhibitors have varying selectivity against individual kinases. Some JAK inhibitors are being tested in other rarer systemic connective tissue diseases. The general advantages of JAK inhibitors are oral administration, rapid onset of action, and efficacy in monotherapy. The safety profile of JAK inhibitors compared with biologic therapy appears to be comparable, with a higher incidence of herpes zoster, and an increased incidence of major cardiovascular disease, thromboembolic complications, and cancer in at-risk patients is discussed. The aim of this paper will be to summarize the latest findings on JAK inhibitors in approved indications for the most common rheumatic diseases.

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: Current concept and unsolved problems

Over the past several decades, the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has advanced significantly, and clinical, structural, and functional remission are achievable therapeutic goals. However, a substantial number of patients show resistance to multiple drugs. In particular, patients whose disease activity cannot be controlled despite the use of two or more biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) with different mechanisms of action (MOA) have recently been referred to as having difficult-to-treat RA (D2T RA). D2T RA is a heterogeneous and multifactorial disease state, and the major problems are uncontrolled disease activity and decreased quality of life, as well as the economic burden due to frequent healthcare utilization and multiple admissions. Since the concept of D2T RA is relatively new and publication regarding D2T RA is limited, the mechanism underlying DMARD inefficacy and which factors form a "difficult-to-treat" state in such patients are not yet fully understood. It is also possible that factors contributing to D2T RA may differ by patient, sex, country, and race. The present Mini Review introduces the current concept and unsolved problems of D2T RA, including the definition, prevalence, and factors contributing to D2T RA. We then discuss the management and therapeutic strategies for D2T RA. Finally, we explore a clinical approach to prevent patients from developing D2T RA.

Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Older Adults: Implications of Ageing for Managing Patients

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous term in which patients may present with difficulties in their management for different reasons. This can ultimately lead to patients being exposed to multiple treatments because of inefficacy (resulting from mechanisms intrinsic to rheumatoid arthritis or from non-inflammatory causes such as chronic pain syndrome or structural damage, among others), toxicity or adverse effects that may be linked to comorbidities. One particular group in which such characteristics may be more patent is older patients. Increasing life expectancy, an ageing population and the late onset of rheumatoid arthritis have led to an increased interest in the particularities of treating older patients. This may pose a challenge for physicians, as ageing has implications for optimal patient treatment owing to the potential presence of comorbidities, the risk of adverse events and perceptions of disease status by both physicians and patients. All of these factors may have implications for classifying and managing patients aged > 65 years as difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, as these patients could be misclassified. This can occur when a significant proportion may still exhibit signs of active disease but not necessarily be difficult to treat because the treatment criterion has not been fulfilled. Alternatively, patients may be exposed to multiple biologic/targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs because of contraindications and/or comorbid conditions. Treatment-to-target strategies and an adequate assessment of inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis activity in older patients should be undertaken, taking special care with associated comorbidities, polypharmacy and risk profiles. Such an approach can help to ensure appropriate treatment for older adults and avoid the misclassification of difficult-to-treat patients.