A simple algorithm for differential diagnosis in hemodynamic shock based on left ventricle outflow tract velocity–time integral measurement: a case series

Principles of Doppler Ultrasonography and Basic Applications for the Clinician

Doppler ultrasonography has evolved into a cornerstone of ultrasound imaging. In this article, we delve into the fundamental principles of Doppler ultrasonography, introduce color and spectral Doppler analysis, and highlight common applications relevant to point-of-care (POCUS) practitioners. From enhancing the safety of bedside procedures to estimating cardiac output, to exploring findings of venous congestion, we review the key advantages, disadvantages, and challenges of using Doppler in POCUS.

Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods

Echocardiography is crucial for evaluating patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and velocity time integral (VTI) aid in diagnosing shock, but bedside calculations can be time-consuming and prone to variability. Artificial intelligence technology shows promise in providing assistance to clinicians performing point-of-care echocardiography. We conducted a systematic review, utilizing a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, to evaluate the interchangeability of LVEF and/or VTI measurements obtained through automated mode as compared to the echocardiographic reference methods in non-cardiology settings, e.g., Simpson´s method (LVEF) or manual trace (VTI). Eight studies were included, four studying automated-LVEF, three automated-VTI, and one both. When reported, the feasibility of automated measurements ranged from 78.4 to 93.3%. The automated-LVEF had a mean bias ranging from 0 to 2.9% for experienced operators and from 0% to -10.2% for non-experienced ones, but in both cases, with wide limits of agreement (LoA). For the automated-VTI, the mean bias ranged between - 1.7 cm and - 1.9 cm. The correlation between automated and reference methods for automated-LVEF ranged between 0.63 and 0.86 for experienced and between 0.56 and 0.81 for non-experienced operators. Only one study reported a correlation between automated-VTI and manual VTI (0.86 for experienced and 0.79 for non-experienced operators). We found limited studies reporting the interchangeability of automated LVEF or VTI measurements versus a reference approach. The accuracy and precision of these automated methods should be considered within the clinical context and decision-making. Such variability could be acceptable, especially in the hands of trained operators. PROSPERO number CRD42024564868.

Executive summary of the consensus document on point-of-care ultrasound implementation: recommendations from the Clinical Ultrasound Working Groups of SEMI, SEDAR, SEGG, SEMERGEN, SEMES, SEMFYC, and SEMG

Point-of-Care Ultrasound has significantly evolved, establishing itself as an essential tool in daily medical practice, especially in various clinical contexts. This consensus document, supported by several Spanish medical societies, proposes guidelines for the effective integration of ultrasound in healthcare, promoting its standardization and ensuring the quality and systematic application of this technique. The working groups, composed of experts from different specialties, conducted a comprehensive review of the literature in MEDLINE and extensively discussed recommendations to formulate a coherent and practical set of guidelines for different application areas: hospital and out-of-hospital emergencies and critical care, primary care, and outpatient hospital care, hospitalization. The methodology included virtual meetings and confidential voting to reach a consensus on the relevant recommendations. Ultrasound was highlighted as fundamental in the initial approach to various pathologies, such as abdominal, thoracic, and musculoskeletal issues, facilitating quick and accurate diagnoses, and reducing the need for unnecessary referrals. Furthermore, this technique has proven valuable in emergencies and critical care, guiding procedures and enhancing the safety and efficiency of clinical interventions. These guidelines not only serve as a framework for clinical practice, education, and research but also aim to ensure that professionals are adequately trained and that ultrasound evaluations are performed to a standard of excellence. The purpose of these recommendations is to standardize and facilitate the adoption of this clinical tool in the daily practice of healthcare, thus improving the quality of the services provided in its various possible applications.

Acute kidney injury and point-of-care ultrasound in liver cirrhosis: redefining hepatorenal syndrome

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cirrhosis is a diagnostic challenge due to multiple and sometimes overlapping possible etiologies. Many times, diagnosis cannot be made based on case history, physical examination or laboratory data, especially when the nephrologist is faced with AKI with a hemodynamic basis, such as hepatorenal syndrome. In addition, the guidelines still include generalized recommendations regarding withdrawal of diuretics and plasma volume expansion with albumin for 48 h, which may be ineffective and counterproductive and may have iatrogenic effects, such as fluid overload and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. For this reason, the use of new tools, such as hemodynamic point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS), allows us to phenotype volume status more accurately and ultimately guide medical treatment in a noninvasive, rapid and individualized manner.

Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with high mortality, with diagnosis and treatment remaining a challenge for clinicians. Their management classically encompasses hemodynamic resuscitation, antibiotic treatment, life support, and focus control; however, there are aspects that have changed. This narrative review highlights current and avant-garde methods of handling patients experiencing septic shock based on the experience of its authors and the best available evidence in a context of uncertainty. Following the first recommendation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, it is recommended that specific sepsis care performance improvement programs are implemented in hospitals, i.e., "Sepsis Code" programs, designed ad hoc, to achieve this goal. Regarding hemodynamics, the importance of perfusion and hemodynamic coherence stand out, which allow for the recognition of different phenotypes, determination of the ideal time for commencing vasopressor treatment, and the appropriate fluid therapy dosage. At present, this is not only important for the initial timing, but also for de-resuscitation, which involves the early weaning of support therapies, directed elimination of fluids, and fluid tolerance concept. Finally, regarding blood purification therapies, those aimed at eliminating endotoxins and cytokines are attractive in the early management of patients in septic shock.

Critical Care Echocardiography: Assessing Left and Right Ventricular Function in the Intensive Care Unit

In this review we explore Left Ventricular and Right Ventricular parameters that intensivists can use to evaluate, manage, and monitor the critically ill. Understanding these parameters, their clinical relevance, and potential pitfalls, is crucial for thorough and accurate patient assessment and management. Critical Care Echocardiography encompasses all the advanced cardiac and non-cardiac skillset needed to integrate the findings of Left Ventricular and Right Ventricular size and function. We advocate for a physiologic approach to the critically ill patient, tailoring therapy to reverse the etiology while simultaneously supporting circulation based on a sound understanding of left and right ventricular pressures, volumes, and flow.

Point-of-Care Echocardiography in the Difficult-to-Image Patient in the ICU: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this narrative review was to address common obstacles encountered in the ICU to acquiring quality and interpretable images using point-of-care echocardiography.

DATA SOURCES

Detailed searches were performed using PubMed and Ovid Medline using medical subject headings and keywords on topics related to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography. Articles known to the authors were also selected based on expert opinion.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles specific to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, RVOT hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION

One author screened titles and extracted relevant data while two separate authors independently reviewed selected articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Impediments to acquiring quality and interpretable images in critically ill patients are common. Notably, body habitus, intra-abdominal hypertension, dressings or drainage tubes, postoperative sternotomies, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the presence of subcutaneous emphysema or lung hyperinflation are commonly encountered obstacles in transthoracic image acquisition in the ICU. Despite these obstacles, the bedside clinician may use obstacle-specific maneuvers to enhance image acquisition. These may include altering patient positioning, respiratory cycle timing, expanding the subcostal window to include multilevel short-axis views for use in the assessment of RV systolic function and hemodynamics, coronal transhepatic view of the inferior vena cava, and finally point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite common obstacles to point-of-care echocardiography in critically ill patients, the beside sonographer may take an obstacle-specific stepwise approach to enhance image acquisition in difficult-to-image patients.

Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond-Forrester Classification

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a first-line tool to assess hemodynamically unstable patients, however, there is confusion surrounding intertwined concepts such as: "flow," "congestion," "fluid responsiveness (FR)," and "fluid tolerance." We argue that the Frank-Starling relationship is clarifying because it describes the interplay between "congestion" and "flow" on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Nevertheless, a single, simultaneous assessment of congestion and flow via POCUS remains a static approach. To expand this, we propose a two-step process. The first step is to place the patient on an ultrasonographic Diamond-Forrester plot. The second step is a dynamic assessment for FR (e.g., passive leg raise), which individualizes therapy across the arc of critical illness.

CARDIAC OUTPUT IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS CAN BE ESTIMATED EASILY AND ACCURATELY USING THE MINUTE DISTANCE OBTAINED BY PULSED-WAVE DOPPLER

ABSTRACT

Background: Cardiac output (CO) assessment is essential for management of patients with circulatory failure. Among the different techniques used for their assessment, pulsed-wave Doppler cardiac output (PWD-CO) has proven to be an accurate and useful tool. Despite this, assessment of PWD-CO could have some technical difficulties, especially in the measurement of left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd). The use of a parameter such as minute distance (MD) which avoids LVOTd in the PWD-CO formula could be a simple and useful way to assess the CO in critically ill patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between PWD-CO and MD. Methods: A prospective and observational study was conducted over 2 years in a 30-bed intensive care unit (ICU). Adult patients who required CO monitoring were included. Clinical echocardiographic data were collected within the first 24 h and at least once more during the first week of ICU stay. PWD-CO was calculated using the average value of three LVOTd and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) measurements, and heart rate. Minute distance was obtained from the product of LVOT-VTI × heart rate. Pulsed-wave Doppler cardiac output was correlated with MD using linear regression. Cardiac output was quantified from the MD using the equation defined by linear regression. Bland-Altman analysis was also used to evaluate the level of agreement between CO calculated from MD (MD-CO) and PWD-CO. The percentage error was calculated. Results: A total of 98 patients and 167 CO measurements were analyzed. Sixty-seven (68%) were male, the median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-75 years), and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 22 (IQR, 16-26). The most common cause of admission was shock in 81 patients (82.7%). Sixty-nine patients (70.4%) were mechanically ventilated, and 68 (70%) required vasoactive drugs. The median CO was 5.5 L/min (IQR, 4.8-6.6 L/min), and the median MD was 1,850 cm/min (IQR, 1,520-2,160 cm/min). There was a significant correlation between PWD-CO and MD-CO in the general population ( R2 = 0.7; P < 0.05). This correlation improved when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less than 60% ( R2 = 0.85, P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between PWD-CO and MD-CO in the general population, the median bias was 0.02 L/min, the limits of agreement were -1.92 to +1.92 L/min. The agreement was better in patients with LVEF less than 60% with a median bias of 0.005 L/min and limits of agreement of -1.56 to 1.55 L/min. The percentage error was 17% in both cases. Conclusion: Measurement of MD in critically ill patients provides a simple and accurate estimate of CO, especially in patients with reduced or preserved LVEF. This would allow earlier cardiovascular assessment in patients with circulatory failure, which is of particular interest in difficult clinical or technical conditions.