The difficult conversation: a qualitative evaluation of the 'Eat Well Move More' family weight management service

A Systematic Review Looking at the Current Best Practices as well as Primary Care Practitioner's Views on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Obesity

Childhood obesity is a significant and growing issue, with the WHO recognising worldwide childhood obesity rates as an epidemic. Primary care is often the first point for monitoring a child's development over time, hence could play an integral part in recognising and addressing childhood obesity. As a result, our systematic review has two objectives. The primary objective is to review the current evidence on best practices in diagnosing and treating childhood obesity. The secondary objective is to review recent qualitative studies looking into the view of primary care practitioners on the treatment and diagnosis of childhood obesity. The rationale for this is to help determine what opportunities there are in primary care in the NHS to tackle childhood obesity. Using searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCHINFO, HMIC and NHS evidence over a five-year period from March 2014 to March 2019, a total of 37 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Out of these, 25 studies identified exploring the diagnosis and treatment of childhood obesity. A few key themes in these studies were identified, including motivational interviewing, m-health, tools and resources used in consultations, the use of dieticians in the primary care team and factors concerned with the identification of obesity in children. The rest of the 12 qualitative studies involved eliciting the views of direct stakeholders about the diagnosis and treatment of obesity in children. Eight of the studies investigated providers' views towards the role of primary care practitioners in treating childhood obesity, two investigated the parents of obese children's perspectives and the other two investigated general practitioners' (GPs) views towards specific tools and resources. Regarding our primary objective, our findings showed many studies looking at interventions to reduce the BMI in obese children fail to do so in a statistically significant way. However, a few interventions have been more consistent in reducing BMI and obesogenic behaviours. Those interventions include ones utilising the motivational interviewing technique and those targeting families, rather than children. Another key finding was that tools and resources available to primary care providers can significantly impact their ability to diagnose and treat obesity, particularly when looking at the detection. Finally, evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of e-health is limited, with views on their use also mixed. Regarding our secondary objective, the qualitative research identified demonstrated many common views from GPs across different countries. It showed healthcare providers (HCPs) perceiving the parents as lacking in motivation to address the issue, HCPs not wanting to damage the relationship with their patients due to it being a sensitive topic to bring up, and a lack of time, training and confidence. However, some of these views may not be generalisable to the UK due to cultural and system differences.

The Use of Effective Language and Communication in the Management of Obesity: the Challenge for Healthcare Professionals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Initial conversations about weight with patients are important to set the tone for future dialogue and management of obesity. There is often reluctance in raising the topic of overweight or obesity in consultations. We aimed to evaluate literature to discover the perceived barriers to optimal discussion about weight status and preferred weight-based terminology for adults, adolescents and parents of younger children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fear of offending patients, insufficient training and lack of knowledge of referral pathways were identified as factors hindering healthcare professionals' ability to discuss weight with patients. Neutral terms, such as 'weight', were preferred by patients, with 'fat' and 'obese' viewed as undesirable and stigmatising words. There is a need for greater support and provision of specific training, including education on communicating weight status, for those involved in the management of obesity. More research is necessary to assess the impact of interventions to improve initial discussions with patients about weight.

Health professionals' views and experiences of discussing weight with children and their families: A systematic review of qualitative research

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals are ideally placed to discuss weight management with children and families to treat and prevent childhood obesity. The aim of this review was to collect and synthesize primary research evidence relating to health professional's views and experiences of discussing weight with children and their families.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE (OVID), PsycINFO (OVID) and Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC). Twenty-six full text qualitative studies published in English Language journals since inception to October 2019 were included. Papers were quality assessed and synthesized using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Data analysis generated five themes: sensitivity of the issue, family-professional relationships, whole systems approach, professional competency and sociocultural context.

CONCLUSION

Supporting behaviour change through discussion of healthy weight with children and families is an important part of the health professional's role. Tailored information for professionals, including resources and training, facilitates them to confidently talk to children and families about weight prioritized within interventions. The success of such interventions requires commitment from a range of professionals to ensure healthy weight is tackled through a whole system approach.

Public health nurse referrals for paediatric weight management: A nested mixed-methods study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To (a) characterise and determine proportions of referred and enrolled children and (b) explore public health nurses' (PHNs) experiences, perspectives and recommendations regarding a new nurse-led referral pathway for paediatric weight management.

BACKGROUND

Children with obesity and their families in Canada access specialised services for obesity management through physician referral. Since this requirement can prevent timely access to health services, we established and tested a referral pathway whereby PHNs directly refer children to specialised care for obesity management.

DESIGN

Nested mixed-methods study reported using GRAMMS.

METHOD

Our research study included children (2-17 years of age; body mass index ≥85th percentile) referred by a PHN to the Pediatric Centre for Weight and Health (PCWH; Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) from April 2017-September 2018. We summarised referral and enrolment data using descriptive statistics and conducted one-on-one, semi-structured telephone interviews with PHNs; interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, managed using NVivo 12 and analysed by two independent reviewers using content analysis.

RESULTS

Our sample included 79 referred children (4.4 ± 1.8 years old; 3.4 ± 1.3 BMI z-score; 52.7% male), of which 47 (59.5%) enrolled in care. PHNs' (n = 11) experiences, perspectives and recommendations regarding the new referral pathway were grouped into four categories: (a) practicality of the referral pathway (e.g., simple and straightforward), (b) utility of the referral pathway (e.g., economic and timesaving), (c) uptake of the referral pathway (e.g., physician's influence) and (d) recommendations to improve the referral pathway (e.g., having electronic access to the referral form).

CONCLUSIONS

A PHN-specific referral pathway led most children and families to enrol in paediatric weight management and overall was perceived as acceptable and appropriate among PHNs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our results highlight the valuable role that PHNs can play in directly referring children to specialised services for weight management. This pathway has the potential to reduce wait times and enhance treatment enrolment.

Understanding local ethnic inequalities in childhood BMI through cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected local data

BACKGROUND

Local-level analysis of ethnic inequalities in health is lacking, prohibiting a comprehensive understanding of the health needs of local populations and the design of effective health services. Knowledge of ethnic disparities in child weight status is particularly limited by overlooking both the heterogeneity within ethnic groupings; and the complex ecological contexts in which obesity arises. This study aimed to establish whether there was variation in childhood BMI across ethnic groups in Coventry, and the influence of individual, school and neighbourhood contexts, using routinely collected local data.

METHODS

National Child Measurement Programme data were compiled for the period 2007/8-2014/15 and combined with routinely collected local data reflecting school performance and demographics, and school and neighbourhood physical environments. Multi-level modelling using Monte Carlo Markov Chain methods was used to account for the clustering of children within schools and neighbourhoods. Ethnic group differences in BMI z-score (zBMI) were explored at 4-5 years and 10-11 years for girls and boys alongside individual, school and neighbourhood covariates.

RESULTS

At age 4-5 years (n = 28,407), ethnic group differences were similar for boys and girls, with children from South Asian, White other, Chinese and 'any other' ethnic groups having a significantly lower zBMI, and Black African children having a higher zBMI, versus White British (WB) children. Patterns differed considerably at age 10-11 years (n = 25,763) with marked sex differences. Boys from White other, Bangladeshi and Black African groups had a significantly higher zBMI than WB boys. For girls, only children from Black ethnic groups showed a significantly higher zBMI. Area-level deprivation was the only important school or neighbourhood covariate, but its inclusion did not explain ethnic group differences in child zBMI.

CONCLUSION

This analysis contributes to the existing literature by identifying nuanced patterns of ethnic disparities in childhood adiposity in Coventry, supporting the targeting of early obesity prevention for children from Black African groups, as well as girls from Black Caribbean and Black other ethnic backgrounds; and boys from Bangladeshi and White other ethnic backgrounds. It also demonstrates the utility of exploring routinely collected local data sets in building a comprehensive understanding of local population needs.