1
|
Curran JA, Somerville M, Boulos L, Caudarella A, Crowther D, Johnson C, Wozney L, MacPhee S, Sinclair D, Elliott Rose A, Jose C, Joudrey M. Identifying harm reduction strategies for alcohol and drug-use in inpatient care settings and emergency departments: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055654. [PMID: 34711603 PMCID: PMC8557290 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People who use alcohol and/or drugs (PWUAD) are at high risk of medical complications, frequent hospitalisation and drug-related death following discharge from inpatient settings and emergency departments (EDs). Harm reduction strategies implemented in these settings may mitigate negative health outcomes for PWUAD. However, the scope of harm reduction strategies used globally within inpatient settings and EDs is unknown. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesise reported harm reduction strategies that have been implemented across inpatient settings and EDs for PWUAD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will include studies from any country and health service reporting on harm reduction strategies implemented in inpatient settings or EDs. The population of interest includes people of any race, gender and age identifying as PWUAD, or individuals who provided care to PWUAD. Studies which describe implementation strategies and barriers and enablers to implementation will be included. Studies published in English, or those available for English translation will be included. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE All (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier Embase.com), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) and SCOPUS (Elsevier Scopus.com). A grey literature search will be conducted. There will be no date restrictions on the search. Titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened in duplicate. Data will be extracted using a standardised form. The results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Scoping reviews do not require ethical approval. Patient partners with lived experience and relevant knowledge users will be engaged as research team members throughout all phases of the research process. A report detailing context, methodology and findings from this review will be disseminated to knowledge users and relevant community stakeholders. This review will be submitted for publication to a relevant peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mari Somerville
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Leah Boulos
- Maritime SPOR Support Unit, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Alexander Caudarella
- Mental Health and Addictions Service, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Crowther
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Catie Johnson
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lori Wozney
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Shannon MacPhee
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Douglas Sinclair
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Jose
- Maritime SPOR Support Unit, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Morgan Joudrey
- Quality and Patient Safety, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burner E, Zhang M, Terp S, Ford Bench K, Lee J, Lam CN, Torres JR, Menchine M, Arora S. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Text Message-Based Intervention to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in Emergency Department Patients: Controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e17557. [PMID: 32496203 PMCID: PMC7303828 DOI: 10.2196/17557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Emergency department (ED) patients have high rates of risky alcohol use, and an ED visit offers an opportunity to intervene. ED-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) reduces alcohol use and health care costs. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may expand the impact of SBIRTs but are understudied in low-resource ED populations. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of and patient satisfaction with a text-based mHealth extension of an ED screening program to reduce risky alcohol use in low-income, urban patients. Methods Research assistants screened a convenience sample of ED patients in person for risky alcohol use via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Patients who reported AUDIT scores ≥8 and <20 were informed of their AUDIT score and risk. RAs invited patients with SMS text message–capable phones to receive mROAD (mobilizing to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in the ED), an SMS text message–based extension of the ED screening program. mROAD is a 7-day program of twice-daily SMS text messages based on the National Institutes of Health’s Rethinking Drinking campaign. Participants were allocated to a control group (daily sham text messages without specific guidance on behaviors, such as “Thanks for taking part!”) or to the mROAD intervention group. Patients were interviewed at 30 days to assess acceptability, satisfaction, and changes in drinking behavior. Satisfaction was examined descriptively. Pre and post measurements of drinking behaviors and motivation were compared, as were differences in change scores between the intervention arms. Results Of 1028 patients screened, 95 (9.2%) exhibited risky alcohol use based on AUDIT, and 23/95 (24%) of those patients did not own an SMS text messaging–capable phone; this left 72/95 (76%) eligible patients. Among eligible participants, 48/72 (67%) agreed to enroll; 31/48 (65%) achieved follow-up (18/24 (75%) in the intervention group and 13/24 (55%) in the control group). Participants who completed follow-up reported high satisfaction. Changes in behavior were similar between the arms. Overall, the number of drinking days reported in the prior 30 days decreased by 5.0 (95% CI 1.7-8.3; P=.004), and the number of heavy drinking days decreased by 4.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 7.15, P=.01). Patients reported an 11-point increase (95% CI 2.6-20, P=.01, 10% overall increase) in motivation to change alcohol use via the Change Questionnaire. The were no statistical differences in drinking days, heavy drinking days, or motivation to change between the arms. Conclusions The mROAD trial was feasible. Over three-quarters of ED patients with risky alcohol use owned a text message–capable phone, and two-thirds of these patients were willing to participate; only 1 patient opted out of the intervention. Although 35% of patients were lost to follow-up at 30 days, those patients who did follow up had favorable impressions of the program; more than 90% reported that SMS text messages were a “good way to teach,” and 89% of intervention arm participants enjoyed the program and found that the messages were motivating. Both the mROAD and sham message groups showed promising changes in alcohol use and motivation to change. mROAD is a feasible intervention that may reduce rates of risky alcohol use in ED patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02158949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158949
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Burner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mark Zhang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sophie Terp
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Kelsey Ford Bench
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Joshua Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Chun Nok Lam
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jesus R Torres
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Michael Menchine
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sanjay Arora
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|