1
|
Mitri E, Reynolds G, Hornung CJ, Trubiano JA. Low-risk penicillin allergy delabeling: a scoping review of direct oral challenge practice, implementation, and multi-disciplinary approaches. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2024; 22:59-69. [PMID: 38098185 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2296068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penicillin allergy is common, and there is increased clinician interest in direct oral challenge (DOC) as a testing strategy for low-risk penicillin allergy. To aid wider implementation of DOC, consensus definitions of low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes, and standardized approaches to assessment, DOC procedures, and evaluation, are required. AREAS COVERED This review systematically reviews studies that have utilized penicillin DOC in healthcare settings to identify heterogeneity in implementation approaches and synthesize low-risk definitions, procedures, and evaluation. EXPERT OPINION Opportunity exists to standardize penicillin DOC procedures in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy to optimize antimicrobial prescribing and reduce the burden of penicillin allergy. Standardizing the definitions of 'low-risk' and 'positive challenge,' and improving the evaluation of patient safety, alongside the development of a unified approach to the structure of undertaking an oral challenge, is likely to increase uptake and confidence among non-allergist clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Mitri
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- National Allergy Centre of Excellence (NACE), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gemma Reynolds
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine J Hornung
- National Allergy Centre of Excellence (NACE), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- National Allergy Centre of Excellence (NACE), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Makris M, Papapostolou N, Pasali M, Aggelidis X, Chliva C, Katoulis AC. Patient Adherence to Written Instructions following Complete Allergological Evaluation for Suspected Beta-Lactam Allergy: A Tertiary Hospital Study in Greece. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1719. [PMID: 38138946 PMCID: PMC10745116 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are among the most prescribed groups of drugs worldwide and have been implicated in a variety of allergic reactions. There is a paucity of literature regarding patient adherence to prescribed instructions following comprehensive allergy assessments. OBJECTIVE The objective was to follow up the clinical course of BL allergy in patients who underwent thorough allergological investigation for suspected BL allergy at a tertiary hospital and ascertain patients' compliance with the provided written instructions. MATERIALS An observational study in patients referred for suspected BL allergy who underwent a comprehensive allergy workup (in vivo ± in vitro tests, DPT in culprit and/or alternative BL) and who subsequently received written instructions was conducted. Data on the nature of the reported drug hypersensitivity reaction, the culprit BL drug, the allergological workup, and the detailed instructions provided in a written drug allergy report were collected retrospectively. Patients' compliance with the instructions was recorded by a telephone survey using a pre-defined questionnaire. RESULTS Among the 212 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 87 patients (72.4% women; mean age 50.1 years; age range 6-84 years) responded to the telephone survey and were included in this study. Surprisingly, 45 out of 87 (51.7%) patients did not adhere to the written instructions. The primary factor contributing to non-compliance was the fear of re-occurrence of a drug-induced allergic reaction (personal and/or triggered by their treating physician reluctance), accounting for 77.7% of cases. The analysis demonstrated that the initial reaction's severity and type, as well as the outcomes of skin testing, did not correlate with compliance to instructions (p > 0.05). Surprisingly enough, a drug provocation test (DPT), irrespectively of the result, emerged as a negative predictor for adherence, with only 40.6% of DPT patients complying compared to 77.8% of those who did not undergo DPT (p = 0.005; odds ratio = 0.195; 95% confidence interval: 0.058-0.655). Variables such as performing DPT with alternative or incriminated drugs or the result of the DPT (positive-negative) were not associated with patient compliance. Conversely, the type of instructions provided exhibited a noteworthy correlation with compliance. Patients who were explicitly instructed to entirely avoid all BL antibiotics demonstrated markedly higher adherence rates (83.3%) compared to those who were advised to have a partial or complete release of BLs (31.8% and 58.1%, respectively; p < 0.05). Notably, among compliant patients who received either the original culprit drug or the alternative (32 out of 87, 36.7%), no allergic reactions were reported. In contrast, among the 12 patients with written avoidance of all BLs, subsequent BL intake led to immediate reactions (Grade I and IV) in 2 patients (16.6%). CONCLUSIONS A notable disparity in patient adherence to written instructions prohibiting or releasing beta-lactams was demonstrated. Less than half of the patients ultimately complied with the provided instructions, underscoring the need for tailored patients' education and strategies to improve adherence in the management of suspected BL allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Makris
- Allergy Unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece (X.A.)
- 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Niki Papapostolou
- Allergy Unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece (X.A.)
- 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Maria Pasali
- Allergy Unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece (X.A.)
| | - Xenofon Aggelidis
- Allergy Unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece (X.A.)
- 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Caterina Chliva
- Allergy Unit “D. Kalogeromitros”, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece (X.A.)
- 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Alexander C. Katoulis
- 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baghdady N, Alothmany HN. Describing Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy Using a Penicillin Allergy Risk Tool (PEN-FAST) in an Outpatient Setting at a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2023; 15:e51322. [PMID: 38288241 PMCID: PMC10823762 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Penicillin is a widely used antibiotic and is frequently reported as a cause of allergic reactions. However, many individuals reporting penicillin allergies are later found to be tolerant. This study, conducted in an outpatient setting at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, aimed to assess the prevalence of self-reported penicillin allergy and to evaluate further the risk of a positive penicillin allergy test using the PEN-FAST tool. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted via in-person questionnaires with patients in the waiting area at the outpatient clinics of KAUH in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Results Among 140 participants, 4% reported a penicillin allergy, with most identifying their allergies based on symptoms. None of these allergies resulted in severe reactions. Notably, 50% reported nausea and itching as symptoms. The PEN-FAST tool categorized 33.3% as moderate risk and 50% as low to very low risk for a positive penicillin skin test. One participant was confirmed to be allergic via a skin prick test. Discussion and conclusion The prevalence of reported penicillin allergy was lower in our study than that previously reported. Evaluation of the PEN-FAST score demonstrated that this prevalence is even lower at 2%. While this single-center study offers valuable insights, further research in diverse healthcare settings is required to validate these findings and refine our understanding of penicillin allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour Baghdady
- Pharmacy Practice, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
| | | |
Collapse
|