Low-risk penicillin allergy delabeling: a scoping review of direct oral challenge practice, implementation, and multi-disciplinary approaches

INTRODUCTION

Penicillin allergy is common, and there is increased clinician interest in direct oral challenge (DOC) as a testing strategy for low-risk penicillin allergy. To aid wider implementation of DOC, consensus definitions of low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes, and standardized approaches to assessment, DOC procedures, and evaluation, are required.

AREAS COVERED

This review systematically reviews studies that have utilized penicillin DOC in healthcare settings to identify heterogeneity in implementation approaches and synthesize low-risk definitions, procedures, and evaluation.

EXPERT OPINION

Opportunity exists to standardize penicillin DOC procedures in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy to optimize antimicrobial prescribing and reduce the burden of penicillin allergy. Standardizing the definitions of 'low-risk' and 'positive challenge,' and improving the evaluation of patient safety, alongside the development of a unified approach to the structure of undertaking an oral challenge, is likely to increase uptake and confidence among non-allergist clinicians.

Impact of a sustained, collaborative antimicrobial stewardship programme in spinal cord injury patients

Background

In patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), infections continue to be a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and hospital admission.

Objectives

This study evaluated the long-term impact of a weekly, multidisciplinary Spinal/Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) meeting for acute-care SCI inpatients, on antimicrobial prescribing over 3 years.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal, pre-post comparison of antimicrobial prescribing was conducted at our tertiary hospital in Melbourne. Antimicrobial prescribing was audited in 6 month blocks pre- (25 April 2017 to 24 October 2017), immediately post- (27 March 2018 to 25 September 2018) and 3 years post-implementation (2 March 2021 to 31 August 2021). Antimicrobial orders for patients admitted under the spinal unit at the meeting time were included.

Results

The number of SCI patients prescribed an antimicrobial at the time of the weekly meeting decreased by 40% at 3 years post-implementation [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.79; P ≤ 0.001]. The overall number of antimicrobial orders decreased by over 22% at 3 years post-implementation (IRR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-1.00; P = 0.052). A shorter antimicrobial order duration in the 3 year post-implementation period was observed (-28%; 95% CI -39% to -15%; P ≤ 0.001). This was most noticeable in IV orders at 3 years (-36%; 95% CI -51% to -16%; P = 0.001), and was also observed for oral orders at 3 years (-25%; 95% CI -38% to -10%; P = 0.003). Antimicrobial course duration (days) decreased for multiple indications: skin and soft tissue infections (-43%; 95% CI -67% to -1%; P = 0.045), pulmonary infections (-45%; 95% CI -67% to -9%; P = 0.022) and urinary infections (-31%; 95% CI -47% to -9%; P = 0.009). Ninety-day mortality rates were not impacted.

Conclusions

This study showed that consistent, collaborative meetings between the Spinal and AMS teams can reduce antimicrobial exposure for acute-care SCI patients without adversely impacting 90 day mortality.

Assessment of inter-rater reliability of screening tools to identify patients at risk of medication-related problems across the emergency department continuum of care

BACKGROUND

Following a national multicentre study, two emergency department (ED) screening tools were developed to determine risk of medication-related problems; one for use at ED presentation and another at ED discharge to the community. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals when applying these screening tools to a series of case scenarios.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study was undertaken in the ED of a major metropolitan hospital. Twelve case scenarios were developed following ED observation of a range of patients, which were incorporated into a questionnaire and distributed to 50 health professionals. Inter-rater reliabilities of each explanatory variable of the screening tools and overall assessment were calculated using Fleiss' multi-rater kappa.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 15 doctors, 19 nurses and 16 pharmacists. Fleiss' kappa showed an overall inter-rater reliability for the ED presentation tool of 0.83 (95% CI 0.83-0.84), indicating near perfect agreement. Fleiss' kappa for the ED discharge tool was 0.83 (95% CI 0.83-0.85), which also showed near perfect agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening tools produced favourable inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals. These results have important implications for ensuring consistency of ED decision-making in screening patients at risk of developing medication-related problems.

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Fewer than 5% of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy are truly allergic. The standard of care to remove the penicillin allergy label in adults is specialized testing involving prick and intradermal skin testing followed by an oral challenge with penicillin. Skin testing is resource intensive, limits practice to specialist-trained physicians, and restricts the global population who could undergo penicillin allergy delabeling.

Objective

To determine whether a direct oral penicillin challenge is noninferior to the standard of care of penicillin skin testing followed by an oral challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This parallel, 2-arm, noninferiority, open-label, multicenter, international randomized clinical trial occurred in 6 specialized centers, 3 in North America (US and Canada) and 3 in Australia, from June 18, 2021, to December 2, 2022. Eligible adults had a PEN-FAST score lower than 3. PEN-FAST is a prospectively derived and internationally validated clinical decision rule that enables point-of-care risk assessment for adults reporting penicillin allergies.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to either direct oral challenge with penicillin (intervention arm) or a standard-of-care arm of penicillin skin testing followed by oral challenge with penicillin (control arm).

Main Outcome and Measure

The primary outcome was a physician-verified positive immune-mediated oral penicillin challenge within 1 hour postintervention in the intention-to-treat population. Noninferiority was achieved if a 1-sided 95% CI of the risk difference (RD) did not exceed 5 percentage points (pp).

Results

A total of 382 adults were randomized, with 377 patients (median [IQR] age, 51 [35-65] years; 247 [65.5%] female) included in the analysis: 187 in the intervention group and 190 in the control group. Most patients had a PEN-FAST score of 0 or 1. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.5%) in the intervention group and 1 patient (0.5%) in the control group, with an RD of 0.0084 pp (90% CI, -1.22 to 1.24 pp). The 1-sided 95% CI was below the noninferiority margin of 5 pp. In the 5 days following the oral penicillin challenge, 9 immune-mediated adverse events were recorded in the intervention group and 10 in the control group (RD, -0.45 pp; 95% CI, -4.87 to 3.96 pp). No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, direct oral penicillin challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy was noninferior compared with standard-of-care skin testing followed by oral challenge. In patients with a low-risk history, direct oral penicillin challenge is a safe procedure to facilitate the removal of a penicillin allergy label.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04454229.

The Who, What, When, and Where of Inpatient Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge-Implications for Health Services Implementation

Inpatient direct oral challenge programs are increasingly deployed as part of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives to reduce the burden and impacts of penicillin allergy labels on antibiotic prescribing. Using data from a prospective, multicenter cohort inpatient penicillin allergy program, we identify the key targets for delabeling to aid health service implementation.

Improving the safety of anticoagulation initiation in patients discharged from the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To improve the safety of anticoagulation initiation by increasing the proportion of patients reviewed by a pharmacist.

METHODS

An electronic intervention was developed to ensure all patients prescribed anticoagulation on discharge were reviewed by an ED pharmacist. Safe anticoagulation initiation was compared for patients seen and not seen.

RESULTS

The intervention increased the number of patients seen by an ED pharmacist. Pre-intervention (n = 238) 84.5% of patients were reviewed by a pharmacist. Post-intervention (n = 253) 99.6% of patients were reviewed by a pharmacist. Of the 38 patients not reviewed by a pharmacist, 20 (52.6%) had safe anticoagulation initiation and in a sample of 40 patients reviewed by a pharmacist, all 40 (100%) had safe anticoagulation initiation (52.6% vs 100%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The real-time electronic intervention improved the number of patients reviewed by a pharmacist. ED pharmacist reviewed patients were more likely to have safe anticoagulation initiation.

Pharmacist-assisted electronic prescribing at the time of admission to an inpatient orthopaedic unit and its impact on medication errors: a pre- and postintervention study

BACKGROUND

Prescribing and administration errors related to pre-admission medications are common amongst orthopaedic inpatients. Postprescribing medication reconciliation by clinical pharmacists after hospital admission prevents some but not all errors from reaching the patient. Involving pharmacists at the prescribing stage may more effectively prevent errors. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacist-assisted electronic prescribing at the time of hospital admission on medication errors in orthopaedic inpatients.

METHODS

A pre- and postintervention study was conducted in the orthopaedic unit of a major metropolitan Australian hospital. During the 10-week intervention phase, a project pharmacist used electronic prescribing to assist with prescribing admission medications and postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, in consultation with orthopaedic medical officers. The primary endpoint was the number of medication errors per patient within 72 h of admission. Secondary endpoints included the number and consequence of adverse events (AEs) associated with admission medication errors and the time delay in administering VTE prophylaxis after elective surgery (number of hours after recommended postoperative dose-time).

RESULTS

A total of 198 and 210 patients, pre- and postintervention, were evaluated, respectively. The median number of admission medication errors per patient declined from six pre-intervention to one postintervention (p < 0.01). A total of 17 AEs were related to admission medication errors during the pre-intervention period compared with 1 postintervention. There were 54 and 63 elective surgery patients pre- and postintervention, respectively. The median delay in administering VTE prophylaxis for these patients declined from 9 h pre-intervention to 2 h postintervention (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist-assisted electronic prescribing reduced the number of admission medication errors and associated AEs.

The Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Events Related to Preadmission Medications When Patients Are Admitted to an Orthopedic Inpatient Unit: An Observational Study

Background: Medication errors commonly occur when patients move from the community into hospital. Whereas medication reconciliation by pharmacists can detect errors, delays in undertaking this can increase the risk that patients receive incorrect admission medication regimens. Orthopedic patients are an at-risk group because they are often elderly and use multiple medications. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and nature of medication errors when patients are admitted to an orthopedic unit where pharmacists routinely undertake postprescribing medication reconciliation. Methods: A 10-week retrospective observational study was conducted at a major metropolitan hospital in Australia. Medication records of orthopedic inpatients were evaluated to determine the number of prescribing and administration errors associated with patients’ preadmission medications and the number of related adverse events that occurred within 72 hours of admission. Results: Preadmission, 198 patients were taking at least 1 regular medication, of whom 176 (88.9%) experienced at least 1 medication error. The median number of errors per patient was 6 (interquartile range 3-10). Unintended omission of a preadmission medication was the most common prescribing error (87.4%). There were 17 adverse events involving 24 medications in 16 (8.1%) patients that were potentially related to medication errors; 6 events were deemed moderate consequence (moderate injury or harm, increased length of stay, or cancelled/delayed treatment), and the remainder were minor. Conclusion and Relevance: Medication errors were common when orthopedic patients were admitted to hospital, despite postprescribing pharmacist medication reconciliation. Some of these errors led to patient harm. Interventions that ensure that medications are prescribed correctly at admission are required.

15N isotopic labelling for in-cell protein studies by NMR spectroscopy and single-cell IR synchrotron radiation FTIR microscopy: a correlative study

The effect of ¹⁵N-enrichment on human cells analyzed by correlative in-cell NMR and single-cell SR-FTIR experiments.

Slick scripts: impact on patient flow targets of pharmacists preparing discharge prescriptions in a hospital with an electronic prescribing system

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Inpatient bed access decreases when ward discharge is delayed. This contributes to prolonged emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) which has been associated with increased hospital LOS and mortality. Delays in preparation of discharge medication prescriptions by ward doctors may contribute to delayed ward discharge. This project aimed to evaluate the effect on patient flow of having a pharmacist collaborate with ward doctors to prepare discharge prescriptions at a hospital with an electronic prescribing system.

METHOD

Eight-week pre- and post-intervention study on two surgical wards at a major metropolitan Australian hospital. During the intervention, a project pharmacist (PP) electronically prepared discharge prescriptions, in consultation with ward doctors, which were reviewed by the regular ward pharmacist before being dispensed. Outcome measures, based on hospital performance indicators, included: Percentage of patients transferred to wards from ED within four and six hours of presentation; Median time (minutes) past 9 am that patients were discharged from the wards; Percentage of patients discharged from wards by 9 am; Staff satisfaction.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-intervention, there were 259 and 246 patients transferred from ED to the study wards, respectively. The percentage of patients transferred within four and six hours of presentation did not change. There were 320 and 341 patients discharged, pre- and post-intervention, respectively, who required a discharge prescription. The PP prepared 273 (80%) prescriptions during the post-intervention period. Patients were discharged 57 minutes earlier with the intervention (median 211 vs. 154 minutes past 9 am, P = 0.01). The percentage of patients discharged before 9 am increased from 6% to 12% (P = 0.01). All 26 health-professional respondents (79% response rate) were satisfied with the service and recommended its continuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist collaboration with doctors to prepare discharge prescriptions did not impact upon ED access targets, but resulted in patients being discharged earlier.

Treatment of intermittent claudication with antiplatelet agents

In a double-blind study, 296 patients with intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage II) were treated with 250 mg ticlopidine twice daily, 500 mg aspirin every third day plus 75 mg dipyridamole three times daily, or 300 mg xanthinol nicotinate three times daily for 6 months. Ticlopidine and aspirin/dipyridamole, but not xanthinol nicotinate, improved platelet aggregation, reduced beta-thromboglobulin, platelet factor IV and fibrinopeptide A concentrations, and increased antithrombin III concentrations and red blood cell filterability. No changes in lipid profiles, platelet count or fibrinogen were recorded following any treatment. The doppler systolic blood pressure ratio was improved in patients treated with ticlopidine or aspirin/dipyridamole, but not with xanthinol nicotinate. It is concluded that antiplatelet treatment is useful for the treatment of limb arteriopathy.

Hemostasis and mechanism of action of selective antimetastatic drugs in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma

The selective antimetastatic agents p-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)benzoic acid potassium salt (DM-COOK), 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) and (+/-)1,2-di(3,5-dioxopiperazin-1-yl)propane (ICRF-159) have been shown to markedly depress the formation of spontaneous hematogenous metastases in mice bearing s.c. Lewis lung carcinoma, with a mechanism unrelated to cytotoxicity for tumor cells. The effects on hemostasis of DM-COOK, DTIC and ICRF-159 have thus been examined in comparison with those of a purely cytotoxic agent, cyclophosphamide, in mice bearing i.m. Lewis lung carcinoma. The parameters considered are the number of platelets and their aggregability, prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times, plasma fibrinogen concentration and tumor cell procoagulant activity. Slight variations are caused by drug treatment in tumor-bearing mice as compared with untreated tumor-bearing controls; the pattern of effects of the selective antimetastatic agents does not differ from that of the reference cytotoxic compound used, cyclophosphamide. These data thus indicate that the effects on hemostasis of the drugs examined can contribute only marginally to their antimetastatic action, since more pronounced effects on hemostasis have been shown to be required to significantly affect metastasis formation.

[Evaluation of platelet function and coagulation in deafness and sudden vestibular disorders]

Thirty-five patients affected by acute vestibular dysfunction (A.V.D.) and/or sudden deafness (S.D.) were studied. Twenty-seven of them presented, as major component of the clinical disorder, a vestibular dysfunction, eight a sudden deafness. The control group was matched for sex, age, smoking habit and family history of diabetes and myocardial infarction. In all the subjects the following tests were carried out: platelet aggregation (Born's method), PF3 (Spaet and Cintron), PF4 and BTg (RIA), aPTT, AT III, cholesterol and triglycerides. The results indicate in the patients group increase of P.A.: SAV = 27 vs 43% (p = 0.03) at 1.2 X 10(-6) M ADP, a larger availability of PF3 in PPP and PRP, increase of PF4: 7.2 vs 17.2 (p = 0.01) and BTg: 32.4 vs 49.1 (p = 0.009). The data indicate in A.V.D. and S.D. a platelet hyperactivity; if so, an antiplatelet therapy may be reasonable.

[Detection of paraproteinemia in blood donors. Results of systematic analysis of 3800 donors in Trieste]

A systematic analysis of plasma protein pattern performed by agarose gel electrophoresis has detected paraproteinemia in 13 out of 3800 blood donors in the district of Trieste. The variations in the incidence of monoclonal gammopathies in surveys of blood donors could be related not only with geographical origin and the age and sex distribution of the population studied but also with the sensitivity of the screening technique employed. The physiopathological and clinical implications of the detection of paraproteins favour the inclusion of the screening plasma electrophoretic analysis among the laboratory investigations for blood donors.