Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review

Six-Degree-of-Freedom Freehand 3D Ultrasound: A Low-Cost Computer Vision-Based Approach for Orthopedic Applications

In orthopedics, X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans play pivotal roles in diagnosing and treating bone pathologies. Machine bulkiness and the emission of ionizing radiation remain the main problems associated with these techniques. The accessibility and low risks related to ultrasound handling make it a popular 2D imaging method. Indeed, 3D ultrasound assembles 2D slices into a 3D volume. This study aimed to implement a probe-tracking method for 6 DoF 3D ultrasound. The proposed method involves a dodecahedron with ArUco markers attached, enabling computer vision tracking of the ultrasound probe's position and orientation. The algorithm focuses on the data acquisition phase but covers the basic reconstruction required for data generation and analysis. In the best case, the analysis revealed an average error norm of 2.858 mm with a standard deviation norm of 5.534 mm compared to an infrared optical tracking system used as a reference. This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing volumetric imaging without ionizing radiation or bulky systems. This marker-based approach shows promise for enhancing orthopedic imaging, providing a more accessible imaging modality for helping clinicians to diagnose pathologies regarding complex joints, such as the shoulder, replacing standard infrared tracking systems known to suffer from marker occlusion problems.

Imaging in shoulder arthroplasty: Current applications and future perspectives

Shoulder arthroplasty has become a standard surgical procedure for treating a variety of complex shoulder disorders, including those with degenerative and traumatic aetiologies. The ever-improving success rates of shoulder arthroplasty could be attributed to advancements in endoprosthesis design, improvements in the biomechanics of endoprosthetic components, and improvements in surgical techniques. It improves patient outcomes and helps restore shoulder joint function and mobility. Imaging plays a vital role by enabling surgeons to plan arthroplasty procedures, help guide endoprosthesis placement, and monitor postoperative outcomes. In addition, imaging plays a role in assessing the residual bone stock and status of rotator cuff integrity and in correcting the placement of prosthetic components to restore shoulder mobility. CT-guided navigation aids surgeons by helping them choose appropriate components for implants and ensuring that implants are placed optimally during surgery. It can lead to better surgical results with reduced patient morbidity and a longer duration of prosthetic stability. After surgery, it is crucial to use imaging techniques to detect issues such as periprosthetic loosening, infections, or fractures to start effective management strategies to enhance patient recovery. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists with knowledge on the imaging methods used in shoulder arthroplasty and their role in presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance and postoperative assessment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the rationale behind utilising various types of shoulder replacements: total shoulder replacement (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and hemiarthroplasty; methods, their respective advantages and limitations; and outcomes. Our objective is to comprehensively analyse the procedures mentioned above and highlight their unique features and benefits to facilitate a better understanding of these approaches. Additionally, we will discuss how these imaging techniques help identify issues such as loose components, fractures around the implant site, joint instability and infections.

Can we separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) can be measured on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs using 2 previously described angles: lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA). However, these 2 angles measure global lateralization and distalization but do not allow to differentiate how much lateralization or distalization are attributable to the glenoid and the humerus. We hypothesized that new angles could allow us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. A more precise understanding of independent glenoid and humeral contributions to lateralization and distalization may be beneficial in subsequent clinical research.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of postoperative AP radiographs of 100 patients who underwent primary RSA for cuff-tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or glenohumeral osteoarthritis were analyzed. The new angles that we proposed use well-known bony landmarks (the acromion, glenoid, and humerus) and the most lateral point of the glenosphere, which we termed the "glenoid pivot point" (GPP). For lateralization, we used the GPP to split LSA into 2 new angles: glenoid lateralization angle (GLA) and humeral lateralization angle (HLA). For distalization, we introduced the modified distalization shoulder angle (mDSA) that can also be split into 2 new angles: glenoid distalization angle (GDA) and humeral distalization angle (HDA). Three orthopedic surgeons measured the new angles, using the online tool Tyche. Mean values with overall and individual standard deviations as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Because the angles form a triangle, the following equations can be made: LSA = GLA + HLA, and mDSA = GDA + HDA. All angles showed excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.92-0.97) with low means of individual standard deviations that indicate a precision of 2° for each angle.

CONCLUSION

Use of the most lateral part of the glenosphere (termed glenoid pivot point) allows us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. The 4 new angles (HLA, GLA, GDA, HDA) described in the present study can be used on true AP radiographs, routinely obtained after shoulder replacement, and the measured angles may be used with all types of reverse prostheses available.

Utility of Recovery Room vs Post-Operative Day 1 Radiographs Following Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

Postoperative radiographs may be performed on different timelines after shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographs obtained in the post-operative recovery unit (PACU) are often of poorer quality. The purpose of the current study was to explore and compare the quality of PACU radiographs and radiographs performed in the radiology suite on post-operative Day 1 (POD1), as well as determine their impact on changes in post-operative management.

Methods

Our series included 50 consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the PACU and 50 consecutive TSA for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the radiology suite on POD 1. TSA radiographs were blinded and reviewed by 3 authors and graded on their quality using criteria described using previously published methods. The weighted kappa was used to describe the intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement between two raters.

Results

There was no difference in age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities between cohorts. Intra-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.65±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.58±0.09 (p<0.001), and 0.67±0.07 (p<0.001). Inter-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.605±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.66±0.07 (p<0.001), and 0.65±0.08 (p<0.001). When assessing quality of radiographs, 30% of radiographs obtained in PACU were deemed quality while 57% of radiographs obtained in the radiology suite were deemed quality (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Post-operative radiographs in the PACU do not alter patient management and are often inadequate to serve as baseline radiographs. Conversely, radiographs obtained in the radiology suite are of higher quality and can serve as a superior baseline radiograph. Level of Evidence: IV.

Arthroplasty-Related Pseudotumor of the Scapula: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Arthroplasty-related pseudotumors are nonneoplastic and noninfectious inflammatory masses that are typically associated with adverse reaction to metal debris. Pseudotumors most commonly occur in the setting of metal-on-metal joint replacements at the hip. However, the presentation of pseudotumor at the shoulder is exceedingly rare. In this article, we reported a case of arthroplasty-related pseudotumor of the scapula. Clinical history, radiologic signs, and tissue analysis are described. Knowledge of this rare diagnosis will support clinical decision making for teams of radiologists, pathologists, oncologists, and orthopaedic surgeons who provide care for patients presenting with suspicious shoulder masses.

Identifying the patient harms to include in an in silico clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials represent a crucial step in the development and approval of medical devices. These trials involve evaluating the safety and efficacy of the device in a controlled setting with human subjects. However, traditional clinical trials can be expensive, time-consuming, and ethically challenging. Augmenting clinical trials with data from computer simulations, so called in silico clinical trials (ISCT), has the potential to address these challenges while satisfying regulatory requirements. However, determination of the patient harms in scope of an ISCT is necessary to ensure all harms are sufficiently addressed while maximizing the utility of the ISCT. This topic is currently lacking guidance. The objective of this work is to propose a general method to determine which patient harms should be included in an ISCT for a regulatory submission.

METHODS

The proposed method considers the risk associated with the harm, the impact of the device on the likelihood of occurrence of the harm and the technical feasibility of evaluating the harm via ISCT. Consideration of the risk associated with the harm provides maximum clinical impact of the ISCT, in terms of focusing on those failure modes which are most relevant to the patient population. Consideration of the impact of the device on a particular harm, and the technical feasibility of modeling a particular harm supports that the technical effort is devoted to a problem that (1) is relevant to the device in question, and (2) can be solved with contemporary modeling techniques.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

As a case study, the proposed method is applied to a total shoulder replacement humeral system. With this framework, it is hoped that a consistent approach to scoping an ISCT can be adopted, supporting investment in ISCT by the industry, enabling consistent review of the ISCT approach across device disciplines by regulators, and providing maximum impact of modeling technologies in support of devices to improve patient outcomes.

Reliability and validity of a new deltoid muscle area measurement method after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Accurate deltoid muscle assessment after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is difficult using magnetic resonance imaging due to metal artifacts. We hypothesized that measuring the deltoid muscle area (DA) in the middle part of the deltoid's total length postoperatively would reduce metal artifacts and allow for an accurate assessment. This study aimed to assess the reliability and reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging and evaluate its impact on postoperative outcomes.

Methods

The DA in the middle part of the muscle's total length was measured twice by four examiners using pre and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in 60 patients who underwent RSA (22 men, 38 women; mean age: 77.4 years). The DA at the greater tuberosity was measured preoperatively, and its correlation with the middle part of the deltoid's total length was evaluated. The Constant-Murley Score was measured at 2 years postoperatively, and its correlation with the DA in the middle part of the deltoid's total length pre- and postoperatively was assessed.

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver measurements of preoperative and postoperative DA in the middle part of the deltoid's total length were almost perfect, with mean values of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver reliability regarding the first and second DA measurements in the middle part of the deltoid's total length were 0.95 and 0.95 (preoperatively) and 0.89 and 0.90 (postoperatively). The Constant-Murley Score was assessed at 2 years postoperatively in 51 patients. Muscle strength was weakly and moderately correlated with preoperative DA (r = 0.33, P = .02) and postoperative DA (r = 0.49, P < .01), respectively.

Conclusion

DA measurement in the middle part of the deltoid's total length after RSA was not affected by metal artifacts and had excellent reproducibility. This measurement method positively correlated with postoperative muscle strength, suggesting its usefulness for predicting postoperative muscle strength.

Role of ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of postoperative rotator cuff

Rotator cuff tears are common shoulder injuries in patients above 40 years of age, causing pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Most recurrent rotator cuff tears happen within three months. Surgical repair is often necessary in patients with large or symptomatic tears to restore shoulder function and relieve symptoms. However, 25% of patients experience pain and dysfunction even after successful surgery. Imaging plays an essential role in evaluating patients with postoperative rotator cuff pain. The ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the most commonly used imaging modalities for evaluating rotator cuff. The ultrasound is sometimes the preferred first-line imaging modality, given its easy availability, lower cost, ability to perform dynamic tendon evaluation, and reduced post-surgical artifacts compared to magnetic resonance imaging. It may also be superior in terms of earlier diagnosis of smaller re-tears. Magnetic resonance imaging is better for assessing the extent of larger tears and for detecting other complications of rotator cuff surgery, such as hardware failure and infection. However, postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff can be challenging due to the presence of hardware and variable appearance of the repaired tendon, which can be confused with a re-tear. This review aims to provide an overview of the current practice and findings of postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each modality and the normal and abnormal imaging appearance of repaired rotator cuff tendon.

Incidence of complications related to shoulder arthroplasties identified on computed tomography

PURPOSE

Determine incidence of shoulder arthroplasty complications identified on computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective institutional database review of patients with shoulder arthroplasties who underwent CT between 01/2006-11/2021 at a tertiary academic referral center with subspecialized orthopedic shoulder surgeons. CT reports were reviewed for arthroplasty type and complication. Data were stratified and summarized. Associations between complications and arthroplasty types were determined with Chi-squared goodness of fit test.

RESULTS

Eight hundred twelve CTs in 797 unique patients were included (438 (53.9%) females and 374 (46.1%) males; mean age 67 ± 11 years). There were 403 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), 317 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA), and 92 hemiarthroplasties (HA). Complications were present in 527/812 (64.9%) and incidences were: loosening/aseptic osteolysis 36.9%, periprosthetic failure 21.6%, periprosthetic fracture 12.3%, periprosthetic dislocation 6.8%, joint/pseudocapsule effusion 5.9%, prosthetic failure 4.8%, infection 3.8%, and periprosthetic collection 2.1%. Complications per arthroplasty were: 305/403 (75.7%) TSAs, 176/317 (55.5%) rTSAs, and 46/92 (50%) HAs (p < 0.001). Periprosthetic fracture (20.8%), prosthetic dislocation (9.8%), and prosthetic failure (7.9%) were highest in rTSAs (p < 0.001, p < 0.013, p < 0.001, respectively). Loosening/aseptic osteolysis most frequent in TSAs (54.1%) (p < 0.001). Periprosthetic failure most frequent in HA (32.6%) (p < 0.001). Significant associations were identified with joint/pseudocapsule effusion and loosening/aseptic osteolysis (p = 0.04) and prosthetic dislocation (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this single tertiary academic referral center cohort, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty complication identified on CT was 64.9% and the most commonly occurring complication was loosening/aseptic osteolysis (36.9%). TSA had the highest incidence of complication (75.7%).

Evaluation of the Painful Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Despite the overall success of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (aTSA and rTSA), some patients continue to have or develop pain postoperatively. As the number of shoulder arthroplasties continues to increase in the United States, it is important that surgeons are able to recognize, diagnose, and treat the various pathologies. Some painful etiologies are specific to either aTSA or rTSA, and others can occur with both implant types. Infections, stiffness, neurologic syndromes, polyethylene wear, aseptic implant loosening, and metal allergies occur, regardless of implant choice. However, after an aTSA, subscapularis repair failure, superior rotator cuff tear, and joint overstuffing can result in shoulder pain. After a rTSA, specific causes of postoperative pain include instability, scapular notching, acromial or scapular spine fractures, subcoracoid pain, and neurologic injury. Regardless of the diagnosis, the surgeon must be methodical in the evaluation and, when appropriate, use blood work, advanced imaging studies, joint aspirations, shoulder arthroscopy, and nerve studies. Once diagnosed, appropriate treatment should be undertaken to resolve the cause of the pain or at least minimize the effect of the pain on the patient's outcome.

Ultrasound of the symptomatic shoulder arthroplasty: Spectrum and prevalence of periarticular soft tissue pathology

PURPOSE

To describe our experience using ultrasound (US) to evaluate postoperative complications in the presence of in situ shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Review of patients who underwent US evaluation following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) or hemiarthroplasty from 2007 to 2020. All studies were reviewed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists to assess for joint effusion, periarticular collection, and characterization of associated rotator cuff tears. Tendon tears were assessed with respect to (1) thickness: low grade (<50% thickness), high grade (>50% thickness), full thickness; (2) morphology (focal vs. diffuse) and location (insertion vs. critical zone). Inter-reader agreements were determined using Cohen's kappa test.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies were performed in 72 patients following TSA, RTSA, or hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-seven exams were solely for diagnostic purposes, and 59 were for guiding joint or periarticular collection aspiration. Twenty-eight studies assessed the cuff tendons post TSA. The mean time between surgery and US examination was 29.2 months. Complete or high-grade tears were identified in 8/28 (28.6%) diagnostic exams. The most commonly torn tendon among TSA patients was the subscapularis, with 13/28 (46.4%) demonstrating at least partial tearing. Inter-reader agreement was excellent for presence of effusion (k = 0.79, p < .001) and periarticular collection (k = 0.87, p < .001), and excellent agreement for presence of subscapularis tear (k = 0.78, p < .001), with fair agreement for assessment of supraspinatus (k = 0.66, p < .001) and infraspinatus (k = 0.60, p < .001) tears.

CONCLUSION

The most commonly torn tendon following anatomic TSA identified by US was the subscapularis, which was torn or deficient in 46.4% of cases. The majority of studies were performed for the guidance of percutaneous aspiration.

Imaging update in arthroplasty

Imaging of metal implants has historically been difficult, regardless of the applied modality. The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing over the years. With it, we expect the number of symptomatic complications to increase as well. Acquiring accurate imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning for these cases is of paramount importance. Significant advancements have been made to reduce artifacts, leading to better imaging representation of arthroplasty. This review article would give a background on the current ways of imaging arthroplasty and metal implants, covering recent advances in imaging techniques.

Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Expanded indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have raised awareness of associated complications, including periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive update on how, when, and why RSA-related periprosthetic fractures occur, as well as to describe the current treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Periprosthetic acromial and scapular spine fractures occur in up to 4.3% of cases and periprosthetic humeral fractures occur in approximately 3.5% of RSA procedures. Fractures of the coracoid process and clavicle have also been reported. Current literature has identified several risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative fracture, including underlying osteoporosis, revision arthroplasty, use of a superiorly placed screw during metaglene fixation, and disruption of the scapular ring by transection of the coracoacromial ligament. Periprosthetic fracture associated with RSA is a clinically significant event that warrants prolonged postoperative vigilance, timely diagnosis, and shared patient decision-making regarding treatment. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies and characterize long-term clinical outcomes following RSA-related periprosthetic fracture.