1
|
Albano D, Mallardi C, Afat S, Agnollitto PM, Caruso D, Cannella R, Carriero S, Chupetlovska K, Clauser P, D'Angelo T, De Santis D, Dioguardi Burgio M, Dumic-Cule I, Fanni SC, Fusco S, Gatti M, Gitto S, Jankovic S, Karagechev T, Klontzas ME, Koltsakis E, Leithner D, Matišić V, Muscogiuri G, Penkova R, Polici M, Serpi F, Sofia C, Snoj Z, Akinci D'Antonoli T, Vernuccio F, Vieira J, Vieira AC, Wielema M, Zerunian M, Messina C. How young radiologists use contrast media and manage adverse reactions: an international survey. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:92. [PMID: 38530547 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01658-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To collect real-world data about the knowledge and self-perception of young radiologists concerning the use of contrast media (CM) and the management of adverse drug reactions (ADR). METHODS A survey (29 questions) was distributed to residents and board-certified radiologists younger than 40 years to investigate the current international situation in young radiology community regarding CM and ADRs. Descriptive statistics analysis was performed. RESULTS Out of 454 respondents from 48 countries (mean age: 31.7 ± 4 years, range 25-39), 271 (59.7%) were radiology residents and 183 (40.3%) were board-certified radiologists. The majority (349, 76.5%) felt they were adequately informed regarding the use of CM. However, only 141 (31.1%) received specific training on the use of CM and 82 (18.1%) about management ADR during their residency. Although 266 (58.6%) knew safety protocols for handling ADR, 69.6% (316) lacked confidence in their ability to manage CM-induced ADRs and 95.8% (435) expressed a desire to enhance their understanding of CM use and handling of CM-induced ADRs. Nearly 300 respondents (297; 65.4%) were aware of the benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, but 249 (54.8%) of participants did not perform it. The preferred CM injection strategy in CT parenchymal examination and CT angiography examination was based on patient's lean body weight in 318 (70.0%) and 160 (35.2%), a predeterminate fixed amount in 79 (17.4%) and 116 (25.6%), iodine delivery rate in 26 (5.7%) and 122 (26.9%), and scan time in 31 (6.8%) and 56 (12.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION Training in CM use and management ADR should be implemented in the training of radiology residents. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT We highlight the need for improvement in the education of young radiologists regarding contrast media; more attention from residency programs and scientific societies should be focused on training about contrast media use and the management of adverse drug reactions. KEY POINTS • This survey investigated training of young radiologists about use of contrast media and management adverse reactions. • Most young radiologists claimed they did not receive dedicated training. • An extreme heterogeneity of responses was observed about contrast media indications/contraindications and injection strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche Ed Odontoiatriche, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carmen Mallardi
- Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Saif Afat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paulo Moraes Agnollitto
- Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Radiology Division of the Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Serena Carriero
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Kalina Chupetlovska
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tommaso D'Angelo
- Diagnostic and Inverventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico De Santis
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Sur L'inflammation, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Ivo Dumic-Cule
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
- University North, 104 Brigade 3, 42000, Varazdin, Croatia
| | | | - Stefano Fusco
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sonja Jankovic
- Center for Radiology, University Clinical Center Nis, Nis, Republic of Serbia
| | | | - Michail E Klontzas
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Koltsakis
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Doris Leithner
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vid Matišić
- St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Ralitsa Penkova
- Radiology Department, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, 51B Nikola Y. Vaptsarov Blvd, Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
| | - Michela Polici
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- PhD School in Traslational Medicine and Oncology, Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Serpi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Sofia
- Diagnostic and Inverventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ziga Snoj
- Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli
- Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - João Vieira
- Radiology, Hospital Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Ana Catarina Vieira
- Radiology Department, Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mirjam Wielema
- Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Zerunian
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albano D, Fusco S, Zappia M, Sconfienza LM, Giovagnoni A, Aliprandi A, Messina C. Musculoskeletal Radiology Education: A National Survey by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:40. [PMID: 38201349 PMCID: PMC10795839 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to understand how musculoskeletal training is structured in Italian residency programmes and the needs of young trainees. METHODS We sent out an online questionnaire (17 questions) to Italian Society of Radiology residents and board-certified radiologists aged up to 39 years. RESULTS A total of 1144 out of 4210 (27.2%) members participated in the survey; 64.7% were residents and 35.3% were board-certified radiologists. Just 26.6% of participants had dedicated rotations for musculoskeletal training during their residency, although this percentage substantially increased in replies from northern Italy. One-fourth of residents had a scheduled period of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Most participants (76.3%) had <20 h per year of musculoskeletal lessons. The majority considered their musculoskeletal education poor (57.7%) or average (21.9%). According to 84.8% of replies, no dedicated training period about interventional musculoskeletal procedures was scheduled. Further, just 12.8% of residents took active part in such interventions. Nearly all participants believed that the musculoskeletal programme during residency needs to be improved, particularly concerning practices in ultrasound (92.8%), MRI cases interpretation/reporting (78.9%), and practice in ultrasound-guided interventional procedures (64.3%). CONCLUSIONS Despite some differences in the structure of musculoskeletal education provided by different regions, there is a shared demand for improvement in musculoskeletal training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.M.S.); (C.M.)
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche e Odontoiatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Fusco
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
- Varelli Institute, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.M.S.); (C.M.)
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60121 Ancona, Italy;
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.M.S.); (C.M.)
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomažin T, Plut D, Snoj Ž. Imaging of Tendinous and Muscular Anatomical Variants Around the Ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2023; 27:206-213. [PMID: 37011621 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Tendinous and muscular anatomical variants around the ankle are usually an unexpected finding on imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging offers the best visualization of the accessory muscles; however, they can also be detected on radiography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. Their accurate identification facilitates appropriate management of the rare symptomatic cases, mostly caused by accessory muscles in the posteromedial compartment. Symptomatic patients present with chronic ankle pain, most commonly as tarsal tunnel syndrome. The most frequently observed accessory muscle around the ankle is the peroneus tertius muscle, an accessory muscle in the anterior compartment. The tibiocalcaneus internus and peroneocalcaneus internus are uncommon; anterior fibulocalcaneus is rarely mentioned. We describe the anatomy of the accessory muscles with their anatomical relations accompanied by schematic drawings and radiologic images from clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjaša Tomažin
- Clinical Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Domen Plut
- Clinical Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Žiga Snoj
- Clinical Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molyneux P, Stewart S, Bowen C, Ellis R, Rome K, Carroll M. A bibliometric analysis of published research employing musculoskeletal imaging modalities to evaluate foot osteoarthritis. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:39. [PMID: 35596206 PMCID: PMC9121542 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00549-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Temporal and global changes in research utilising imaging to assess foot osteoarthritis is currently unknown. This study aimed to undertake a bibliometric analysis of published research to: (1) identify the imaging modalities that have been used to evaluate foot osteoarthritis; (2) explore the temporal changes and global differences in the use of these imaging modalities; and (3) to evaluate performance related to publication- and citation-based metrics. Methods A literature search was conducted using Scopus to identify studies which had used imaging to assess foot osteoarthritis. Extracted data included publication year, imaging modality, citations, affiliations, and author collaboration networks. Temporal trends in the use of each imaging modality were analysed. Performance analysis and science mapping were used to analyse citations and collaboration networks. Results 158 studies were identified between 1980 and 2021. Plain radiography was the most widely used modality, followed by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound imaging (USI), respectively. The number of published studies increased over time for each imaging modality (all P ≥ 0.018). The most productive country was the United States of America (USA), followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. International authorship collaboration was evident in 57 (36.1%) studies. The average citation rate was 23.4 per study, with an average annual citation rate of 2.1. Conclusions Published research employing imaging to assess foot osteoarthritis has increased substantially over the past four decades. Although plain radiography remains the gold standard modality, the emergence of MRI and USI in the past two decades continues to advance knowledge and progress research in this field. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00549-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prue Molyneux
- School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, New Zealand. .,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Sarah Stewart
- School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Bowen
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Versus Arthritis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard Ellis
- School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Keith Rome
- School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Carroll
- School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, 90 Akoranga Drive, Northcote, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|