Label extension, single-arm, phase III study shows efficacy and safety of stempeucel® in patients with critical limb ischemia due to atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in atherosclerosis: A bibliometric and visual analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are capable of self-renewal and differentiation, and extensive studies have demonstrated their therapeutic potential in atherosclerosis (AS).

AIM

To conduct a bibliometric analysis of studies on the use of MSC therapy for AS over the past two decades, assess key trends and provide insights for future research directions.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Web of Science Core Collection database for articles published between 1999 and 2023, yielding a total of 556 articles. Visual representation and bibliometric analysis of information and trends were facilitated using CiteSpace, the R package 'bibliometrix' and VOSviewer.

RESULTS

The analyzed articles were predominantly from 52 countries/regions, with prominent contributions from China and the United States. A cohort of 3057 authors contributed to these publications, with the works of Libby P distinguished by their influence and citation count. Int J Mol Sci has emerged as the journal with the highest publication volume, prominently disseminating influential papers and identifying citation outbreaks. Furthermore, our analysis identified current research hotspots within the field, focusing on vascular progenitor cells, inflammatory mechanisms, and extracellular vesicles. Emerging research frontiers, such as extracellular vesicles and oxidative stress, have been highlighted as areas of burgeoning interest. Finally, we offer perspectives on the status of research and future directions of MSC therapy in AS.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights for advancing scientific research on MSC therapy for AS. By elucidating pivotal trends and research directions, this study aimed to foster innovation and promote the progress of disciplines in this field, thereby contributing to advancing scientific knowledge and clinical practice.

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy (REGENACIP®), a promising treatment option in chronic limb threatening ischemia - a narrative review

Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) is a challenging clinical problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular interventions have been the cornerstone of treatment whenever possible. It is estimated that CLTI represents < 10% of all Peripheral Artery Disease patients, yet 50% of the patients end up either with a major amputation of the lower limbs or die of cardiovascular causes within one year period, especially in those with unsuccessful revascularization or "no-option" CLTI. Cell-based therapeutics, especially bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells have emerged as a potential, promising, and novel alternate therapeutic modality in the management of CLTI, bolstered with positive results in numerous research, including randomized and nonrandomized trials. REGENACIP® is one such BM-MSC therapy approved by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization in India for the management of "no-option" Atherosclerotic Peripheral Arterial disease / Buerger's disease patients with established critical limb ischemia in Rutherford Grade III-5 or III-6, not eligible for or have failed traditional revascularization treatment, with rest pain and / or ulcers in the affected limb. The current review aims to deliberate upon the various aspects of CLTI and clinical benefits of REGENACIP® therein.

[The application of cell products for the treatment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature]

The number of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) has been progressively increasing worldwide over the past decades, and many international organizations consider DM as a public health emergency of the 21st century.Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe stage of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in DM and is characterized by a high risk of limb loss without revascularization. Traditional treatment tactics include open and endovascular revascularization surgical techniques. However, in patients not eligible for revascularization and in cases where performed surgical treatment performed has been ineffective, there are almost no therapeutic alternatives, often leading to amputations and death. As of today, one of the newest non-surgical treatment options is cell therapy. Among different cells, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are potentially one of the most prospective for use in this patient population.This article provides an overview of clinical trials using cell therapy in patients with CLI.To analyze publications, electronic databases PubMed, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials, and ScienceDirect were searched to identify published data from clinical trials, research studies, and review articles on cell therapy for critical lower extremity ischemia. After the search, 489 results were received.As a result of systematic selection, 22 clinical trials were analyzed.According to the analyzed literature data, the use of cell products in this category of patients is effective and safe. Cell therapy can stimulate the formation of new vessels and enhances collateral circulation; it is also reported improved distal perfusion, increased pain-free walking distance, decreased amputation rates, and increased survival rates.Nevertheless, further study of the potential use of this category of drugs is needed.

Arterial Leg Ulcers in the Octogenarian

Arterial leg ulcers are a debilitating sequela of chronic ischemia, and their management, particularly in the octogenarian, is an immense challenge. ALUs are frequently a manifestation of end-stage peripheral arterial disease, and their presence portends a high morbidity and mortality. Management primarily relies on restoration of flow, but in the geriatric population, interventions may carry undue risk and pathologies may not be amenable. Adjunctive therapies that improve quality of life and decrease morbidity and mortality are therefore essential, and understanding their benefits and limitations is crucial in developing a multimodal treatment algorithm of care for the uniquely challenging octogenarian population.

Unraveling the differential mechanisms of revascularization promoted by MSCs & ECFCs from adipose tissue or umbilical cord in a murine model of critical limb-threatening ischemia

BACKGROUND

Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) constitutes the most severe manifestation of peripheral artery disease, usually induced by atherosclerosis. CLTI patients suffer from high risk of amputation of the lower extremities and elevated mortality rates, while they have low options for surgical revascularization due to associated comorbidities. Alternatively, cell-based therapeutic strategies represent an effective and safe approach to promote revascularization. However, the variability seen in several factors such as cell combinations or doses applied, have limited their success in clinical trials, being necessary to reach a consensus regarding the optimal "cellular-cocktail" prior further application into the clinic. To achieve so, it is essential to understand the mechanisms by which these cells exert their regenerative properties. Herein, we have evaluated, for the first time, the regenerative and vasculogenic potential of a combination of endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from adipose-tissue (AT), compared with ECFCs from umbilical cord blood (CB-ECFCs) and AT-MSCs, in a murine model of CLTI.

METHODS

Balb-c nude mice (n:32) were distributed in four different groups (n:8/group): control shams, and ischemic mice (after femoral ligation) that received 50 µl of physiological serum alone or a cellular combination of AT-MSCs with either CB-ECFCs or AT-ECFCs. Follow-up of blood flow reperfusion and ischemic symptoms was carried out for 21 days, when mice were sacrificed to evaluate vascular density formation. Moreover, the long-term molecular changes in response to CLTI and both cell combinations were analyzed in a proteomic quantitative approach.

RESULTS

AT-MSCs with either AT- or CB-ECFCs, promoted a significant recovery of blood flow in CLTI mice 21 days post-ischemia. Besides, they modulated the inflammatory and necrotic related processes, although the CB group presented the slowest ischemic progression along the assay. Moreover, many proteins involved in the repairing mechanisms promoted by cell treatments were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of AT-MSCs with AT-ECFCs or with CB-ECFCs promoted similar revascularization in CLTI mice, by restoring blood flow levels, together with the modulation of the inflammatory and necrotic processes, and reduction of muscle damage. The protein changes identified are representative of the molecular mechanisms involved in ECFCs and MSCs-induced revascularization (immune response, vascular repair, muscle regeneration, etc.).

Advantages of pooling of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells from different donors versus single-donor MSCs

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) from adult bone marrow are the most commonly used cells in clinical trials. MSCs from single donors are the preferred starting material but suffer from a major setback of being heterogeneous that results in unpredictable and inconsistent clinical outcomes. To overcome this, we developed a method of pooling MSCs from different donors and created cell banks to cater clinical needs. Initially, the master cell banks (MCBs) were created at passage 1 (P1) from the bone marrow MSCs isolated from of nine different donors. At this stage, MCBs from three different donors were mixed in equal proportion and expanded till P3 to create working cell banks. Further, the pooled cells and individual donor MSCs were expanded till P5 and cryopreserved and extensively characterised. There was a large heterogeneity among the individual donor MSCs in terms of growth kinetics (90% Coefficient of variation (CV) for cell yield and 44% CV for population doubling time at P5), immunosuppressive ability (30% CV at 1:1 and 300% CV at 1:10 ratio), and the angiogenic factor secretion potential (20% CV for VEGF and71% CV for SDF-1). Comparatively, the pooled cells have more stable profiles (60% CV for cell yield and 7% CV for population doubling time at P5) and exhibit better immunosuppressive ability (15% CV at 1:1 and 32% CV at 1:10 ratio ) and consistent secretion of angiogenic factors (16% CV for VEGF and 51% CV for SDF-1). Further pooling does not compromise the trilineage differentiation capacity or phenotypic marker expression of the MSCs. The senescence and in vitro tumourigenicity characteristics of the pooled cells are also similar to those of individual donor MSCs. We conclude that pooling of MSCs from three different donors reduces heterogeneity among individual donors and produces MSCs with a consistent secretion and higher immunosuppressive profile.

[National expert consensus on the diagnosis and surgical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy (2024 version)]

Diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy possess the characteristics of high incidence, slow healing, and poor prognosis, which may eventually lead to amputation or even life-threatening if not treated properly. The treatment of complicated lower extremity vasculopathy is vital to improve the healing process of diabetic foot ulcers, which has gradually received attention in clinical practice. Recently, a number of clinical trials on diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy were reported. In order to further standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy, an expert group headed by Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, Chinese Burn Association, and Wound Repair Professional Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association deliberated and compiled the National expert consensus on the diagnosis and surgical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy (2024 version) together. This consensus is based on evidences from the literature, covers the disease characteristics, evidence-based evidence of clinical diagnosis and treatment, as well as the application of new technologies and new treatment approaches of diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy. The goal of this consensus is to provide clear guidance to practitioners on the best approaches for screening, diagnosing, and treating diabetic foot ulcers complicated with lower extremity vasculopathy in individuals, hoping to provide a normative clinical practice basis for medical staff engaged in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.

Cell Therapy of Vascular and Neuropathic Complications of Diabetes: Can We Avoid Limb Amputation?

Globally, a leg is amputated approximately every 30 seconds, with an estimated 85 percent of these amputations being attributed to complications arising from diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), as stated by the American Diabetes Association. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a risk factor resulting in DFU and can, either independently or in conjunction with diabetes, lead to recurring, slow-healing ulcers and amputations. According to guidelines amputation is the recommended treatment for patients with no-option critical ischemia of the limb (CTLI). In this article we propose cell therapy as an alternative strategy for those patients. We also suggest the optimal time-frame for an effective therapy, such as implanting autologous mononuclear cells (MNCs), autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) as these treatments induce neuropathy relief, regeneration of the blood vessels and tissues, with accelerated ulcer healing, with no serious side effects, proving that advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMPs) application is safe and effective and, hence, can significantly prevent limb amputation.