Peak nasal inspiratory flow as outcome for provocation studies in allergen exposure chambers: a GA2LEN study

A Modern Approach to Clinical Outcome Assessment in Allergy Management: Advantages of Allergen Exposure Chambers

Allergic diseases triggered by airborne allergens such as allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis are increasingly prevalent, posing significant challenges for both patients and healthcare systems. Assessing the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy and other anti-allergic treatments requires precise and reproducible methods. Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) have emerged as advanced tools for evaluating clinical outcomes, offering controlled conditions that address many limitations of traditional field-based studies. This review explores the advantages of AECs in allergy management, emphasizing their role in providing standardized allergen exposure for both clinical research and routine assessments. AECs deliver consistent and reproducible data comparable to the nasal allergen challenge and natural allergen exposure, making them a valuable addition to the diagnosis and treatment effectiveness of allergic diseases. Although they are well suited to early-stage clinical trials, further standardization and validation are needed to gain broader acceptance in pivotal phase III studies. Future research should focus on refining AEC protocols and integrating them into regulatory frameworks, ensuring their role in the advancement of therapeutic approaches for allergic diseases.

Analyzing phenotypes post-exposure in allergic rhinitis in the environmental exposure unit

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have defined clinical phenotypes of allergic rhinitis (AR) after allergen exposure using the time course of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS).

OBJECTIVE

To validate previously proposed AR phenotypes across different allergens (birch, grass, ragweed, and house dust mite) after exposure in the environmental exposure unit.

METHODS

The Analyzing Phenotypes Post-Exposure in Allergic Rhinitis (APPEAR) database comprises 153 participants from environmental exposure unit studies conducted between 2010 and 2021 by Kingston Allergy Research. TNSS, nasal congestion symptom scores, and percent change in peak nasal inspiratory flow from baseline (%ΔPB) were recorded for each participant. Participants were phenotyped using previously described criteria.

RESULTS

There were 65 participants (42.5%) classified as early-phase responders (EPRs), 58 (37.9%) as protracted EPRs (pEPRs), 13 (8.5%) as dual responders (DRs), and 17 (11.1%) as low responders (LoRs). Significant negative correlations exist between TNSS and %ΔPB (r = -0.99, P < .0001) and nasal congestion symptom score and %ΔPB (r = -0.99, P < .0001). At the beginning of the late-phase AR response (6-7 hours), pEPRs had significantly higher TNSS compared with EPRs, DRs, and LoRs (P < .0001). By the end of the study (up to 12 hours), DRs and pEPRs had significantly higher TNSS compared with EPRs and LoRs (P < .0001). Visible validity and statistical validity between the phenotypes were also confirmed by assessing participants' mean TNSS and mean %ΔPB over time when grouping by phenotype.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that distinct phenotypes exist in the late-phase AR response among different allergens and in a greater sample size than described previously, which could provide clinical benefit.

Birch-induced allergic rhinitis: Results of exposure during nasal allergen challenge, environmental chamber, and pollen season

Background

Pollen variation can affect field study data quality. Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is considered the gold standard for evaluating allergic rhinitis, while environmental exposure chambers (EECs) are mainly used in phase 2 drug development studies. We aimed to study birch-induced allergic rhinitis under 3 different conditions.

Methods

This study included 30 participants allergic to birch pollen, based on birch skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and positive NAC. Participants were exposed to placebo twice, followed by 2 consecutive 4-h birch airborne exposures, repeated on 2 occasions to evaluate reproducibility and priming effect. Nasal response was defined as total corrected nasal symptom score (ΔTNSS) ≥ 5 during NAC and EEC. The primary end-point was to measure TNSS during the last 2 h of first allergen exposure. TNSS was also analyzed during natural exposure.

Results

The dose most commonly yielding positive TNSS during NAC was 175.2 ng/200 μL. Eighteen participants experienced ΔTNSS ≥5 during the last 2 h of the first exposure, whereas 21 had positive responses at all 4 exposures. Mean ΔTNSS was 1 with placebo versus 6 with birch. Exposures were reproducible, with no observed priming effect. Airborne Bet v 1 was 25 ng/m³, while the pollen measurement was 279/m³ during pollen season. TNSS reached 5 in 67.9% of participants during peak pollen season.

Conclusion

EEC outcomes were similar to those obtained with NAC and natural exposure, suggesting the usefulness of EEC in allergic rhinitis studies. The primary end-point was reached, as 60% of participants experienced nasal responses.

Skin Physiology, Mucosal Functions, and Symptoms Are Modulated by Grass Pollen and Ozone Double Exposure in Allergic Patients

INTRODUCTION

Along with climate changes, we see an increase in allergic symptoms and the number of pollen-allergic patients in many countries. Increased allergic symptoms are associated with an elevated ozone exposure which may be linked by impaired epithelial barrier function. This study aimed to quantify the clinical effect of ozone and pollen double exposure (DE). We tested whether ozone impairs barrier-related skin physiology and mucosal functions under DE with pollen in grass pollen-allergic patients versus healthy controls.

METHODS

This case-control study included 8 grass pollen-allergic patients and 8 non-allergic healthy subjects exposed to grass pollen and ozone in the GA2LEN pollen chamber, comparing shorter and longer DE duration. Non-invasive skin physiological parameters were assessed, including stratum corneum hydration, skin redness, surface pH, and basal transepidermal water loss as a parameter for epidermal barrier function. The subjects' general well-being, bronchial, nasal, and ocular symptoms were documented.

RESULTS

Skin physiology tests revealed that DE in allergic patients deteriorates the epidermal barrier function and increases the surface pH and skin redness. DE significantly induced nasal secretion in pollen-allergic versus healthy subjects, which was more pronounced with longer DE. The general well-being was significantly impaired under DE versus pollen or ozone alone, with a negative influence of DE duration. No relevant bronchial symptoms were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Skin physiology and nasal mucosal symptoms are negatively affected by ozone and grass pollen DE in allergic patients. The negative effects showed, in some parameters, a dose (time)-response relationship. The pH can be regarded as a possible modulatory mechanism.

Technical standards in allergen exposure chambers worldwide - an EAACI Task Force Report

Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) can be used for controlled exposure to allergenic and non-allergenic airborne particles in an enclosed environment, in order to (i) characterize the pathological features of respiratory diseases and (ii) contribute to and accelerate the clinical development of pharmacological treatments and allergen immunotherapy for allergic disease of the respiratory tract (such as allergic rhinitis, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and allergic asthma). In the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency for the clinical development of products for allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the role of AECs in determining primary endpoints in dose-finding Phase II trials is emphasized. Although methodologically insulated from the variability of natural pollen exposure, chamber models remain confined to supporting secondary, rather than primary, endpoints in Phase III registration trials. The need for further validation in comparison with field exposure is clearly mandated. On this basis, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) initiated a Task Force in 2015 charged to gain a better understanding of how AECs can generate knowledge about respiratory allergies and can contribute to the clinical development of treatments. Researchers working with AECs worldwide were asked to provide technical information in eight sections: (i) dimensions and structure of the AEC, (ii) AEC staff, (iii) airflow, air processing, and operating conditions, (iv) particle dispersal, (v) pollen/particle counting, (vi) safety and non-contamination measures, (vii) procedures for symptom assessments, (viii) tested allergens/substances and validation procedures. On this basis, a minimal set of technical requirements for AECs applied to the field of allergology is proposed.

Precision Medicine in Mite Allergic Rhinitis

It is well-known that a correct diagnosis is necessary for effective treatment. In the case of allergic rhinitis due to mites, imprecise diagnosis with effective but improvable methods means that in many cases an optimal result is not reached in patients. The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis due to mite sensitization have to require more homogeneously reproducible diagnostic tests that try to encompass many more of the protein antigens contained in them. With the few proteins that the problem has usually focused on, there is no they would cover many of the clinically relevant allergens in a large proportion of patients. In this mini-review we try to highlight the importance of having good allergenic sources and briefly gather information on various allergenic proteins included in mites that could be clinically relevant. All this to try to get closer to a more accurate diagnosis. We are also talking about two diagnostic tools that are clearly out of use and that should be promoted in the consultations to obtain an even greater and better outcome in patients.

Validity of Skin Prick Test to Bermuda Grass in a desert environment

Background and aim:

Skin prick test (SPT) with a wheal diameter of >3 mm, generally accepted as a positive, is most commonly use diagnostic tool for Allergic rhinitis. Aim was to validate wheal size of Skin Prick Test for the Bermuda grass, in desert environment, with positive Bermuda grass Nasal challenge in same environment.

Methods:

In 53 adults, mean age 33.43 ± 9.36 years, both gender (females: 33.96%), SPT positive on Bermuda grass with cut off wheal longest diameter of 3 mm, Bermuda grass nasal challenge test (bgNCT) was carried out. Response was assessed subjectively (scored) and objectively (PNIF). Safety profile was assessed by PEF measurement.

Results:

Mean weal size of SPT (mm) was bigger in bgNCT positive patients (n=47; 88.68%) 8 [4, 15] vs 5 [3, 6] (p<0.0001). ROC analysis showed Bermuda Grass SPT at the threshold of >6.5mm enabled identification of Bermuda challenge with sensitivity of 82.98% and specificity of 100.0% (area under the curve 0.9326, standard error 0.03528; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8635 to 1.002; p=0.0006203).

Conclusions:

A SPT wheal size ≥6.5mm might be considered as an appropriate wheal size for confirming Bermuda grass allergy in adults with SAR, avoiding the demanding, time consuming and often unavailable bgNCT, especially in patients eligible for allergen immunotherapy. In these patients, bgNCT is recommended if SPT wheal size is <6.5 mm. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Comparative nasal airflow with loratadine-pseudoephedrine and fluticasone nasal spray for allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Although it is known that oral antihistamine-pseudoephedrine combination tablets have a faster onset than intranasal corticosteroid sprays in the treatment of allergic rhinitis after the first dose, the magnitude of change has not been measured in a comparative manner. Furthermore, the sensation of sprayed liquid in the nose may lead patients to mistakenly believe that intranasal steroid sprays work instantly.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, numerically, nasal airflow changes provided by a single dose of loratadine-pseudoephedrine tablet (LP) and fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FP) in participants experiencing allergic rhinitis symptoms, including nasal congestion.

METHODS

This single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluated objective nasal airflow changes in patients with a documented sensitivity to ragweed pollen. Participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 treatment sequences, and their peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) was measured in a span of 4 hours after pollen exposure in an environmental exposure unit.

RESULTS

Average change in PNIF was 31% with LP in the course of the study, significantly greater than with placebo and FP (12% and 15%, respectively; P < .001). Nevertheless, FP did not produce a significant change compared with its placebo. At hour one post-dose, LP had a clinically significant 31% increase in PNIF, whereas FP only yielded an 8.6% increase (P < .001). Measurable nasal airflow improvements are associated with the opening of nasal passages, allowing congested patients to breathe more freely.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of LP quickly and significantly (P < .001) improved nasal airflow after ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit. Comparatively, FP did not display this same benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03443843.

Targeted micronutrition via holo-BLG based on the farm effect in house dust mite allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients – first evaluation in a standardized allergen exposure chamber

Purpose

Evaluation of a lozenge for targeted micronutrition (holo-BLG), a new invention based on the farm effect, in house dust mite (HDM) allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) patients in a standardized allergen exposure chamber (AEC).

Methods

Eligible HDM allergic patients were exposed to HDM raw material in an AEC for 120 min before (V1) and after (V3) 3 months of holo-BLG supplementation. Nasal, conjunctival, bronchial and other symptoms were rated by the patients every 10 min and, wellbeing, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and lung function parameters every 30 min. Primary endpoint was the change in median Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) at V3 compared to V1 at 120 min of exposure. Secondary endpoints consisted of the exploratory analysis of the temporal evolution of symptom scores using linear mixed effects models.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in the analysis. A significant improvement of 60% (p = 0.0034) in the primary endpoint TNSS (V1 2.5 [interquartile range, IQR 1–4], V3 1.0 [IQR 1–3]) was observed. 40% improvement was seen for the Total Symptom Score (V1 5.0 [IQR 3–9], V3 3.0 [IQR 2–4]; [Wilcoxon test: confidence interval 1.5–4.0, p < 0.0003]). The analysis of the temporal evolution of all symptom scores and the personal wellbeing revealed clinically meaningful improvement over time, manifested in a lower symptom increase during the final HDM exposure. No relevant differences were observed for PNIF and lung function parameters. Safety and tolerability were rated as excellent.

Conclusions

The effect of holo-BLG resulting in immune resilience might help to fight the allergy epidemic on a new front based on targeted micronutrition of immune cells.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04477382).

Objectification of the nasal patency assessment techniques used in nasal allergen provocation testing

Topical allergen application in nasal provocation testing (NPT) is associated with remarkably rapid changes in nasal patency. Thus, selecting the techniques of assessing the extent of nasal obstruction (as one of the responses to topical allergen application) is an important component of NPT. The study attempted to systematize and evaluate the techniques selected for assessing nasal patency during NPT based on a review of relevant literature. We reviewed the literature on the attempts to standardize the objective techniques for assessing nasal patency and their use in NPT. The best known, well-established technique for assessing nasal patency as part of NPT was rhinomanometry, followed by peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) testing and acoustic rhinometry.

Korean Modification of Nasal Provocation Test with House Dust Mites Antigen following EAACI Guidelines

Objectives

We evaluated the usefulness of the standardized nasal provocation test (NPT) protocol recently published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and compared the utility of several parameters for diagnosing allergic rhinitis (AR) caused by house dust mites (HDM). Subjective parameters were nasal and ocular symptoms measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and objective parameters were peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), minimal cross-sectional area (MCA), and total nasal volume (TNV).

Methods

Before and after spraying Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) allergen (1,000 AU/mL, 100 μL) into both nostrils of 13 patients with AR (AR group) and 22 patients with non-AR (NAR group), we used VAS scores to measure nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching) and ocular symptoms and assessed PNIF, MCA, and TNV.

Results

The AR group had significantly worse symptoms than the NAR group 15 minutes after DP challenge (P<0.001). After 30 minutes, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea remained worse in the AR group (P<0.001); a similar but less marked difference was seen for sneezing (P=0.012) and itching (P=0.039). Ocular symptoms, PNIF, MCA, and TNV differed between groups after both 15 and 30 minutes (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for nasal obstruction (0.977), rhinorrhea (0.906), and TNV (0.979) than for sneezing (0.755), itching (0.673), and MCA (0.836).

Conclusion

NPT performed according to the EAACI guidelines could help diagnose AR caused by HDM. TNV and VAS changes in nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea had higher diagnostic accuracy than other parameters.

Adherence to Prescribed E-Diary Recording by Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: Observational Study

Background

Complete diagnosis and therapy of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis require evidence that exposure to the sensitizing pollen triggers allergic symptoms. Electronic clinical diaries, by recording disease severity scores and pollen exposure, can demonstrate this association. However, patients who spontaneously download an e-diary app show very low adherence to their recording.

Objective

The objective of our study was to assess adherence of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to symptom recording via e-diary explicitly prescribed by an allergist within a blended care approach.

Methods

The @IT-2020 project is investigating the diagnostic synergy of mobile health and molecular allergology in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In the pilot phase of the study, we recruited Italian children (Rome, Italy) and adults (Pordenone, Italy) with seasonal allergic rhinitis and instructed them to record their symptoms, medication intake, and general conditions daily through a mobile app (Allergy.Monitor) during the relevant pollen season.

Results

Overall, we recruited 101 Italian children (Rome) and 93 adults (Pordenone) with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Adherence to device use slowly declined during monitoring in 3 phases: phase A: first week, ≥1267/1358, 90%; phase B: second to sixth week, 4992/5884, 80% to 90%; and phase C: seventh week onward, 2063/2606, 70% to 80%. At the individual level, the adherence assessed in the second and third weeks of recording predicted with enough confidence (Rome: Spearman ρ=0.75; P<.001; Pordenone: ρ=0.81; P<.001) the overall patient adherence to recording and was inversely related to postponed reporting (ρ=–0.55; P<.001; in both centers). Recording adherence was significantly higher during the peak grass pollen season in Rome, but not in Pordenone.

Conclusions

Adherence to daily recording in an e-diary, prescribed and motivated by an allergist in a blended care setting, was very high. This observation supports the use of e-diaries in addition to face-to-face visits for diagnosis and treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and deserves further investigation in real-life contexts.

Highlights and recent developments in airway diseases in EAACI journals (2017)

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) owns three journals: Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and Clinical and Translational Allergy. One of the major goals of EAACI is to support health promotion in which prevention of allergy and asthma plays a critical role and to disseminate the knowledge of allergy to all stakeholders including the EAACI junior members. There was substantial progress in 2017 in the identification of basic mechanisms of allergic and respiratory disease and the translation of these mechanisms into clinics. Better understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms, efforts for the development of biomarkers for disease prediction, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multimorbidies, entrance of new drugs in the clinics as well as recently completed phase three clinical studies and publication of a large number of allergen immunotherapy studies and metaanalyses have been the highlights of the last year.